hodler

10 Mar 2026, 16:55

Clarity Act Crisis: Why Ric Edelman Demands Crypto Compromise Now

BitcoinWorld Clarity Act Crisis: Why Ric Edelman Demands Crypto Compromise Now WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 2025 – The cryptocurrency industry faces a critical legislative crossroads as prominent investor Ric Edelman issues a stark warning about the pending Clarity Act. The Digital Asset Council Chairman argues that industry stakeholders must compromise on key provisions, particularly regarding stablecoin interest payments, or risk losing the entire market structure bill. This development comes amid increasing regulatory scrutiny and could significantly shape the future of digital asset markets in the United States. The Clarity Act Compromise Imperative Ric Edelman, a respected voice in financial circles, recently highlighted the precarious position of the Clarity Act. He specifically identified the debate over interest payments on stablecoins as a major stumbling block. Furthermore, Edelman projected that traditional banking institutions would likely prevail in this particular dispute. Consequently, he urged the crypto industry to adopt a pragmatic approach. The legislative timeline adds urgency to his warning. The bill could become deadlocked if Congress fails to pass it before the upcoming midterm elections. Political analysts note that election cycles typically disrupt legislative progress. Therefore, the window for action is narrowing rapidly. Edelman’s central argument emphasizes that some regulatory clarity is better than none at all. Understanding the Stablecoin Interest Debate The controversy centers on whether stablecoin issuers should pay interest to holders. Traditional banks argue this constitutes banking activity requiring existing financial licenses. Conversely, crypto firms view it as a fundamental feature of decentralized finance. Regulatory bodies have expressed concerns about consumer protection and financial stability. Key aspects of the debate include: Banking Charter Requirements: Should stablecoin lending require a banking charter? Consumer Protection: How should regulators ensure investor safety? Market Competition: Will new rules create unfair advantages? International Standards: How does this align with global frameworks? Stablecoin Regulation Positions Stakeholder Position on Interest Primary Concern Traditional Banks Oppose unless chartered Level playing field Crypto Industry Support as innovation Regulatory overreach Regulators (SEC/CFTC) Cautious, seeking clarity Investor protection Consumer Advocates Mixed, with safeguards Transparency and risk Historical Context of Crypto Legislation The Clarity Act represents years of legislative effort. Previous attempts at comprehensive crypto regulation have repeatedly stalled in Congress. Notably, the 2023 Digital Asset Market Structure Discussion Draft faced similar challenges. Industry observers point to increasing bipartisan interest in establishing clear rules. However, technical details continue to create significant disagreements among stakeholders. Quantum Computing Threats Dismissed Separately, Edelman addressed growing concerns about quantum computing’s potential impact on Bitcoin. He suggested these fears are largely overblown. Specifically, he argued that quantum computers would likely target larger financial systems first. Major banking infrastructure and government systems present more attractive targets for potential attackers. Cryptography experts generally support this assessment. Current quantum computers remain in early developmental stages. Moreover, the Bitcoin network could implement quantum-resistant upgrades if necessary. The cryptocurrency community has already begun researching post-quantum cryptographic solutions. Therefore, immediate threats appear minimal despite long-term considerations. Portfolio Allocation Recommendations Edelman also provided updated investment guidance during his remarks. He advised investors to consider allocating up to 40% of their portfolios to cryptocurrencies. However, he emphasized concentration on major, established assets. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana received specific mention as core holdings. This recommendation reflects several important factors: Market Maturation: Increased institutional adoption Regulatory Progress: Clearer frameworks emerging Technological Development: More robust infrastructure Historical Performance: Strong long-term returns Financial advisors note that such allocations remain aggressive. Traditional portfolios typically contain much smaller crypto exposures. Nevertheless, Edelman’s position highlights growing mainstream acceptance. Diversification across multiple major cryptocurrencies can potentially reduce risk while maintaining growth exposure. The Role of Major Cryptocurrencies Bitcoin continues to function as digital gold and a store of value. Ethereum’s smart contract platform enables decentralized applications. Solana has gained attention for its high transaction speeds. Together, these assets represent different aspects of the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Investors should understand each asset’s unique characteristics and risk profile. Legislative Process and Timeline The Clarity Act must navigate multiple congressional committees. Both the House Financial Services Committee and Senate Banking Committee hold jurisdiction. Committee members have expressed varying levels of support for different provisions. Stakeholder lobbying has intensified as the legislative session progresses. Key upcoming milestones include: Committee markups and amendments Floor debates in both chambers Potential conference committee reconciliation Presidential signature or veto Industry representatives continue meeting with legislative staff. They seek compromises that preserve innovation while addressing regulatory concerns. The stablecoin interest provision remains the most contentious issue. However, other sections covering exchange regulations and token classification also require resolution. Global Regulatory Implications United States legislation often influences international standards. The European Union recently implemented its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. Asian financial centers like Singapore and Hong Kong have established their own regulatory approaches. American clarity could help harmonize global digital asset rules. International coordination presents both challenges and opportunities. Divergent regulations create compliance complexities for global firms. However, coordinated standards could enhance market stability. The Financial Stability Board and International Organization of Securities Commissions monitor these developments closely. Conclusion The Clarity Act represents a pivotal moment for cryptocurrency regulation in the United States. Ric Edelman’s warning highlights the practical realities of legislative compromise. The stablecoin interest debate exemplifies difficult choices facing industry participants. Meanwhile, quantum computing threats appear manageable within existing technological roadmaps. Investment allocations continue evolving as markets mature. Ultimately, regulatory clarity benefits all market participants through established rules and reduced uncertainty. The coming months will determine whether compromise prevails or political deadlock continues. FAQs Q1: What is the Clarity Act? The Clarity Act is proposed legislation establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States, covering exchanges, token classification, and stablecoin operations. Q2: Why does Ric Edelman think the crypto industry should compromise? Edelman believes compromise on issues like stablecoin interest payments is necessary to pass any legislation, as political realities make perfect solutions unlikely before the midterm elections. Q3: Are quantum computers really a threat to Bitcoin? While theoretically possible, practical quantum attacks remain distant, and Bitcoin could implement quantum-resistant cryptography long before such threats materialize. Q4: Is 40% portfolio allocation to cryptocurrency advisable for most investors? This represents an aggressive allocation suitable only for investors with high risk tolerance; most financial advisors recommend smaller allocations based on individual circumstances. Q5: What happens if the Clarity Act doesn’t pass before the midterm elections? Legislative progress typically slows during election periods, potentially delaying comprehensive crypto regulation for another congressional session or longer. This post Clarity Act Crisis: Why Ric Edelman Demands Crypto Compromise Now first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

10 Mar 2026, 16:45

Gold Price Soars: Bullion Breaks $5,200 Barrier as Dollar Weakens and Yields Retreat

BitcoinWorld Gold Price Soars: Bullion Breaks $5,200 Barrier as Dollar Weakens and Yields Retreat Global financial markets witnessed a historic surge on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, as the spot price of gold decisively broke through the $5,200 per ounce barrier. This remarkable rally finds its primary drivers in a concurrent softening of the US dollar and a notable retreat in US Treasury yields, offering robust support to the precious metal’s value. Gold Price Rally: Analyzing the $5,200 Breakthrough The ascent past $5,200 marks a significant technical and psychological milestone for gold markets. Consequently, analysts are scrutinizing the underlying macroeconomic forces. Historically, gold exhibits an inverse relationship with the US dollar’s strength. Furthermore, lower interest rates reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold. This dual dynamic is currently providing a powerful tailwind. Market data from the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) confirms the sustained buying pressure. Trading volumes for gold futures on the COMEX also spiked significantly during the session. This activity suggests participation from both institutional investors and algorithmic trading systems. The Dual Drivers: US Dollar Weakness and Yield Dynamics The US Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the greenback against a basket of major currencies, has declined for three consecutive sessions. This decline follows recent economic data indicating moderating inflation and softer retail sales figures. A weaker dollar makes dollar-denominated gold cheaper for holders of other currencies, thereby boosting international demand. Simultaneously, the yield on the benchmark 10-year US Treasury note has fallen below 3.8%. This movement reflects shifting expectations regarding the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy trajectory. Lower yields enhance gold’s appeal as they diminish the relative attractiveness of interest-bearing government bonds. Expert Analysis on Market Sentiment and Structure Dr. Anya Sharma, Chief Commodities Strategist at Global Macro Insights, provided context. “The market is pricing in a more dovish Fed pivot,” she stated. “Investors are increasingly seeking hedges against potential currency depreciation and financial market volatility. Gold’s role as a traditional safe haven is being reaffirmed.” Data from the World Gold Council supports this view. Central bank purchases, particularly from emerging market institutions, have remained a consistent source of demand throughout the first quarter of 2025. This institutional buying creates a solid floor for prices. Historical Context and Comparative Performance To understand the scale of the current move, a brief historical comparison is instructive. The following table outlines key gold price milestones over the past decade: Year Key Price Level (USD/oz) Primary Market Catalyst 2020 ~$2,070 Pandemic-induced global stimulus 2023 ~$2,100 Banking sector stress and inflation fears 2024 ~$2,500 Geopolitical tensions and sustained central bank buying 2025 (Current) >$5,200 Monetary policy shift, dollar weakness, and structural demand The current price represents a doubling from levels seen just two years prior. This acceleration highlights the changing macro-financial landscape. Moreover, gold has significantly outperformed major equity indices year-to-date, reinforcing its diversification benefits. Broader Market Impacts and Sector Correlation The surge in gold has produced ripple effects across related financial sectors. Notably, mining equities, as tracked by the NYSE Arca Gold BUGS Index, have experienced substantial gains. Additionally, flows into physically-backed gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have turned positive after a period of outflows. Other precious metals have also moved, though not uniformly. Silver, often called ‘poor man’s gold,’ has rallied but with higher volatility. Platinum and palladium prices have shown more muted responses, remaining tied to industrial demand outlooks. This divergence underscores gold’s unique status as a monetary metal. The Inflation and Real Rates Framework A critical analytical lens involves real interest rates—nominal yields adjusted for inflation. When real rates fall or turn negative, gold typically performs well. Current forecasts suggest inflation may prove stickier than expected, even as nominal yields drop. This scenario could create a prolonged period of negative real rates, a fundamentally bullish environment for gold. Market participants are closely monitoring upcoming Consumer Price Index (CPI) releases and Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) communications. Any deviation from the expected dovish path could introduce short-term volatility. However, the structural demand drivers appear firmly in place. Technical Outlook and Key Resistance Levels From a chartist perspective, breaking $5,200 opens the path toward higher technical targets. The next significant resistance zone is projected around the $5,400-$5,500 area. On the downside, the previous resistance near $5,000 is now expected to act as a major support level. The moving average configuration is strongly bullish, with the 50-day and 200-day averages trending upward. Momentum indicators like the Relative Strength Index (RSI) are in elevated territory, suggesting the rally may be extended in the near term. However, they do not yet signal a definitive reversal. Key factors for sustained upward momentum include: Continued Dollar Softness: Sustained DXY weakness is crucial. Yield Containment: 10-year yields remaining below 4.0%. Central Bank Demand: Ongoing official sector purchases. Geopolitical Stability: Absence of a sharp de-escalation that reduces safe-haven flows. Conclusion The gold price surge above $5,200 is a multifaceted event driven by tangible macroeconomic shifts. The combination of a softer US dollar and retreating Treasury yields has provided potent fundamental support. While technical indicators suggest the move may be mature in the short term, the underlying drivers of monetary policy uncertainty and strategic asset allocation appear durable. This milestone underscores gold’s enduring relevance within the global financial system as both a hedge and a barometer of broader economic sentiment. FAQs Q1: Why does a weaker US dollar cause gold prices to rise? A weaker US dollar makes gold cheaper for investors using other currencies. This increased affordability typically boosts international demand, pushing the dollar-denominated price higher. Q2: What is the relationship between Treasury yields and gold? Gold pays no interest. When Treasury yields fall, the opportunity cost of holding gold decreases, making it more attractive relative to interest-bearing assets like government bonds. Q3: Are central banks still buying gold? Yes. According to the World Gold Council, central banks, particularly in emerging markets, have been consistent net buyers of gold for several years, adding to their reserves for diversification and security. Q4: What does ‘real interest rate’ mean for gold? A real interest rate is the nominal yield minus inflation. Negative real rates (when inflation is higher than the yield) are historically very bullish for gold, as it preserves purchasing power better than cash or low-yielding bonds. Q5: Could this gold price rally reverse quickly? While any asset can experience corrections, a sharp reversal would likely require a significant shift in the core drivers—such as a sudden surge in the US dollar or a hawkish pivot from the Federal Reserve that sends yields sharply higher. This post Gold Price Soars: Bullion Breaks $5,200 Barrier as Dollar Weakens and Yields Retreat first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

10 Mar 2026, 16:32

South Korean prosecutors sell seized Bitcoin for $21.5M

South Korean prosecutors have converted a cache of seized Bitcoin into cash for the state treasury after the cryptocurrency was unexpectedly returned following a phishing-related security breach. According to multiple local media reports , the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office sold 320.8 BTC at prevailing market prices and transferred about 31.6 billion Korean won, roughly $21.5 million, to the national treasury. The liquidation took place gradually over eleven days between February 24 and March 6, with authorities reportedly splitting the sales into smaller batches to avoid disrupting the market. The Bitcoin were originally confiscated during an investigation into an illegal online gambling platform that operated between 2018 and 2021. In August 2025, officials responsible for managing the confiscated assets were reportedly tricked by a phishing website that mimicked a legitimate service. During what was believed to be a routine audit, an officer inadvertently entered the wallet’s private recovery credentials into the fraudulent site, which allowed the attacker to drain the entire balance of 320.8 BTC. Authorities did not immediately detect the breach, and the disappearance of the funds was only discovered months later during an internal review of seized financial holdings. Investigators traced the stolen cryptocurrency to a hacker-controlled address and asked domestic and overseas exchanges to freeze the wallet, limiting the attacker’s ability to liquidate the funds. In an unexpected turn, the hacker sent back the full amount of Bitcoin in February. Prosecutors then moved the assets to a secure exchange wallet and began selling them shortly afterwards. Although the liquidation has now returned more than $21 million to the state, the hacker responsible for the breach remains unidentified, and the investigation continues. The episode has intensified scrutiny of how South Korean authorities manage confiscated digital assets, particularly as similar incidents have surfaced across other agencies. A nationwide audit following the Gwangju breach revealed that Seoul’s Gangnam Police Station had also lost 22 BTC seized in 2021. Unlike the phishing attack in Gwangju, that case involved a breakdown in evidence handling procedures. Officers had left the cryptocurrency in a cold wallet originally provided by the suspects without changing the access credentials. The wallet itself was never stolen, and investigators are examining the possibility of internal involvement. Another incident drew public criticism after the National Tax Service inadvertently exposed a cryptocurrency wallet recovery phrase during a press report. Security lapses trigger review Repeated lapses have raised concerns about the technical readiness of law enforcement agencies tasked with safeguarding large cryptocurrency holdings. South Korea’s finance minister has since pledged reforms aimed at tightening oversight of digital assets held by government agencies. In a statement posted on social media, the minister said authorities will work with the Financial Services Commission and the Financial Supervisory Service to conduct a comprehensive inspection of cryptocurrency holdings acquired through legal enforcement actions such as tax seizures. The review will examine how confiscated digital assets are stored, who has access to private keys, and how different agencies coordinate custody procedures. Officials said the process will also introduce stronger security controls to prevent similar incidents in the future. The post South Korean prosecutors sell seized Bitcoin for $21.5M appeared first on Invezz

10 Mar 2026, 16:29

Dogecoin ETFs Finally See Inflows Again — Is DOGE Ready to Wake Up After a Quiet Stretch?

Dogecoin exchange-traded funds are attracting investments once more, signaling potential market movements. After a period of stillness, could Dogecoin be on the brink of a resurgence? This article explores whether Dogecoin is poised for growth and examines which other cryptocurrencies are showing signs of waking up. Dogecoin Poised for Breakout with Potential Gains Ahead Source: tradingview Dogecoin is currently trading within the narrow range of eighty-three cents to just shy of a dollar. The price has been stable, with a slight increase of over 4% in the last week. However, Dogecoin has dropped significantly by sixty percent over the past six months. Right now, it's approaching a resistance level near eleven cents. If it breaks past this, the next target is almost thirteen cents, marking a possible gain of over thirty percent from current levels. The current momentum, supported by indicators like the RSI and Stochastic, suggests Dogecoin might gear up for an upward movement if the buying pressure continues. However, the recent past month's figures show a nearly even performance. Conclusion DOGE inflows suggest renewed interest might be on the horizon. With the market showing signs of support, DOGE may experience upward momentum soon. Any shifts in the broader market could further influence its price action. A closer look at trading volumes and investor sentiment will provide more clarity. Monitoring these factors closely will be key in understanding DOGE's next move. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

10 Mar 2026, 16:25

Crypto commentators question judge’s differing stance in Uniswap and Tornado Cash cases

Commentators in the crypto sector have drawn attention to a disturbing difference in the rhetoric of District Judge Hon. Katherine Failla, the presiding judge in the Uniswap and Tornado Cash cases, as prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) motioned for the retrial of Roman Storm, one of the developers behind the now unsanctioned crypto money mixer service. In an X post responding to criticism of the DOJ’s decision to retry Roman Storm in October, Brian Nistler, Uniswap Labs’ Associate General Counsel and Head of Policy, recalled a sentiment shared by Judge Failla when she passed her judgment in the lawsuit filed in April 2022, when investors accused Uniswap Labs of aiding fraud schemes. In Judge Fallia’s words : It “‘defies logic’ that a drafter of a smart contract, a computer code, could be held liable … for a third-party user’s misuse of the platform.” However, it appears that “logic” is not being applied to Roman Storm, who is seeking financial support again, as he is back to appealing for funds for what is expected to be a fresh round with the hardcore prosecutors from the South District of New York. South District judge draws line between Uniswaps and Tornado Cash According to an observation by the host of the Crypto in America podcast, Eleanor Terrett, there is a palpable difference in Judge Failla’s tone, despite the apparent overlaps between Uniswap Labs’ defense and the case against Tornado Cash. Roman Storm has many crypto stakeholders sympathetic to his cause, raising over $5.4 million from donors like the Ethereum Foundation and Vitalik Buterin. However, one thing that many have struggled to understand is why it appears the SDNY and DOJ continue to aggressively pursue legal action against the Tornado Cash developer despite mounting arguments against it. Some have gone as far as calling the apparent double standards “ judicial prejudice ” on the part of the judge, as the push to resurrect the case comes after a jury had abstained from delivering a verdict on money laundering and sanctions violations charges against Storm. Amanda Tuminelli, executive director and CLO at DeFi Education Fund, called out “multiple legal and logical fallacies” and “obvious mistakes” by the SDNY prosecutors the first time, including “calling irrelevant witnesses and not understanding the forensic analysis of their own blockchain evidence.” Jennifer Rosenthal Maimon from the same outfit struggled to describe how icky the “beyond disappointing outcome” felt. Comments made by Judge Failla during her ruling in the Uniswap Labs case from last week aside, Dean Eigenmann asked if the March 2026 document by the US Treasury Department helped Storm’s case in any way. In the report to Congress, the Treasury Department made the argument for why regular people need crypto mixers like Tornado Cash to keep their financial data private, while admitting the concern that criminals may also misuse the service. Jay Clayton and SDNY prosecutors extend mean streak Grok, xAI’s chatbot, specifically namedropped United States Attorney Jay Clayton in its response to a query by Alex Shapiro, founder and CEO of MetaLeX and former general counsel at Delphi Labs, about “who makes the prosecutorial decisions for the US DOJ SDNY.” It added that Clayton and the Assistant U.S. Attorneys assigned to it in the relevant division expressed their “substantial autonomy” with this March 9 filing requesting Roman Storm’s retrial date, even though high-profile matters may involve coordination with the Main Justice in D.C. Jay Clayton is infamous in crypto circles for knocking down every Bitcoin ETF attempt while in office and initiating many of the lawsuits that were subsequently dropped by the pro-crypto Trump administration, including the XRP lawsuit that he filed on his last day in office in December 2020. Former SEC Chair Gary Gensler also cited Clayton’s 2018 “ every ICO I have seen is a security” comment as legal precedent for the heavy-handed approach his administration took with the crypto sector. The SDNY, where Clayton now serves as a US Attorney , has also had its target trained on crypto offenders. The office led the prosecution of Samourai Wallet devs, with William Hill getting a four-year sentence while his partner, Keonne Rodriguez, got hit with five years for running a crypto mixer that hid over $200 million in illegal money. Cryptopolitan reported last month that SDNY prosecutors, including Letitia James and Alvin Bragg, wrote to Congress to complain about how the GENIUS Act allows stablecoin companies like Tether and Circle to earn billions in interest on stolen funds instead of turning over the assets to the authorities or returning them to the victims. Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

10 Mar 2026, 16:05

Dark Defender to XRP Holders: You Will Be Late When the Clarity Act Is In

Cryptocurrency markets are often shaped as much by regulatory developments as by price movements. For investors, the anticipation of new legislation can create both opportunities and pressure, particularly when a bill promises to clarify long-standing uncertainties. In the case of XRP, the Clarity Act has emerged as a focal point , sparking debates about timing, impact, and strategic positioning within the crypto community. XRP commentator Dark Defender recently addressed this issue in a post on X, cautioning holders that they risk being “late” if they wait too long for the Clarity Act to take effect. His statement immediately provoked discussion among traders and enthusiasts, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the bill’s timeline and its potential consequences for XRP adoption and integration. What the Clarity Act Means for XRP The Clarity Act seeks to provide a more precise regulatory framework for digital assets, clarifying classifications and compliance requirements. Proponents argue that such legislation could reduce uncertainty, encourage institutional participation, and enable broader adoption of blockchain-based payment systems. You will be late when the Clarity Act is in. — Dark Defender (@DefendDark) March 9, 2026 For XRP, clearer rules could accelerate integration with banks and financial institutions, positioning the asset for long-term growth. However, passing legislation of this nature requires navigating complex political, legal, and industry dynamics. Lawmakers must balance investor protections with the need to support innovation, while also addressing potential resistance from established financial institutions. These factors often extend the timeline from proposal to enactment, creating gaps between market expectations and regulatory reality. Community Debate on Timing Dark Defender’s warning prompted responses from other members of the XRP community. Notably, user Xeowolf challenged the timeline, suggesting that the Clarity Act may face delays until at least mid-year and that banks could push back against certain provisions . This exchange illustrates the tension between optimism for regulatory clarity and the practical hurdles that often slow legislative progress. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 For investors, understanding these dynamics is crucial. Anticipating a favorable regulatory environment too early can lead to mistimed market positions, while ignoring legislative developments can cause missed opportunities. Strategic Considerations for Holders XRP holders may benefit from balancing awareness of regulatory developments with a focus on market fundamentals and technical trends. Tracking price action, ecosystem developments, and broader institutional interest can provide context for positioning decisions while maintaining patience during extended periods of legislative uncertainty. The discussion also underscores the value of informed decision-making. Investors who monitor the evolving regulatory landscape, along with adoption trends in the XRP ecosystem, can adjust their strategies proactively rather than reactively. Balancing Optimism with Realism Dark Defender’s post serves as a reminder that XRP’s trajectory depends on the interplay between technology, market dynamics, and regulation. While the Clarity Act could create meaningful opportunities for adoption and growth , the timing and impact remain uncertain. XRP holders who combine cautious optimism with strategic awareness are best positioned to respond effectively as the regulatory landscape unfolds. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Dark Defender to XRP Holders: You Will Be Late When the Clarity Act Is In appeared first on Times Tabloid .