hodler

29 Apr 2026, 17:14

Solana Ventures Leads $18 Million Round in Squads to Expand Stablecoin Platform Altitude

Solana Ventures has led an $18 million strategic funding round for Squads as the company pushes deeper into stablecoin payments. The new capital lifts Squads’ total funding to $42.9 million and strengthens its Altitude platform. Coinbase Ventures, Haun, L1D, Collab+Currency, Electric Capital, Placeholder, Jump Crypto, and Robot Ventures also joined the round. Significantly, the investment comes as more firms move toward blockchain-based financial systems. Altitude aims to replace many traditional banking functions with a stablecoin-driven platform that gives businesses faster global access to payments, treasury tools, and multi-currency accounts. Altitude Expands Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Squads designed Altitude as a financial operating system instead of a traditional banking service. The platform lets businesses hold treasury funds in stablecoins instead of standard bank accounts. Additionally, it connects companies to payment providers that handle fiat conversions across multiple regions. The company said Altitude now supports payment coverage in more than 150 countries. It routes transactions through providers such as Bridge, MoonPay, Infinite, and Due. Consequently, businesses can send ACH, SEPA, wire, SWIFT, and stablecoin payments from one balance. Altitude also removes repeated onboarding for each payment provider. Customers complete compliance verification once through Altitude. The platform then manages sanctions checks, AML screening, transaction monitoring, and KYB verification. Hence, businesses can access new payment rails without restarting the approval process. Squads said Altitude has already processed more than $200 million in payments since its public launch in the fourth quarter of 2025. Moreover, the system has served businesses operating across more than 50 countries. Security Model Supports Onchain Treasury Squads has also focused heavily on account security as more firms move funds onchain. Every Altitude account operates as a programmable smart account on the Solana blockchain. The protocol already protects more than $10 billion in digital assets. Each user account relies on several independent security keys. These include a passkey and two email-based keys through Privy and Turnkey. Additionally, account administrators can require hardware devices such as Ledger or YubiKey for larger transfers. That structure gives businesses direct control over treasury assets. Besides, every transaction remains visible on the public blockchain. Squads believes this model offers stronger transparency than conventional banking systems. SOL Price Remains in a Tight Range While the funding highlights ecosystem growth, Solana’s market performance remains weak. SOL trades at $83.15 with a 24-hour volume of $2.9 million . The token has fallen 0.29% over 24 hours and 6.36% during the past week. Its market capitalization stands at $47,926,691,404 with 580 million tokens in circulation. CRYPTOKRALI noted that Solana still trades inside a narrow range near $84. The analyst identified $82 to $85 as the key support zone. Losing that range could send SOL toward $78 to $80. However, buyers still need a move above $90 to change the current market structure.

29 Apr 2026, 17:00

FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Loses Bid For Retrial

Sam Bankman-Fried’s attempt to get a new trial collapsed Tuesday when a federal judge called his legal arguments baseless — and suggested the whole effort was less about justice than about fixing his public image. Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over Bankman-Fried’s 2023 fraud trial and later sentenced him to 25 years in prison, rejected the motion in a written order. He said the filing appeared to be “one part of a plan to rescue his reputation” — a plan Bankman-Fried reportedly put to paper after FTX’s bankruptcy but before he was ever charged. Witnesses Were Never A Secret At the center of Bankman-Fried’s argument were three former FTX insiders he claimed could have challenged the government’s case that the exchange was insolvent. He named Ryan Salame, FTX’s former Bahamian CEO, Daniel Chapsky, the exchange’s former head of data science, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s onetime engineering lead. The argument didn’t land. Kaplan wrote that none of the three qualified as newly discovered witnesses. Bankman-Fried had known all of them well before trial and already knew what he wanted them to say. The judge pointed out that he could have sought to compel their testimony but chose not to. Singh had actually testified — against Bankman-Fried. He cut a plea deal with prosecutors and avoided prison time in exchange for his cooperation. Bankman-Fried argued Singh had changed his testimony under pressure from the government. Kaplan dismissed that claim outright, calling it “wildly conspiratorial and entirely contradicted by the record.” Salame, for his part, was not available as a friendly witness. He had pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations and running an illegal money-transmitting business, and was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison in May 2024. A Motion Filed Without Lawyers The bid for a new trial was unusual from the start. Bankman-Fried filed the motion in February without consulting his legal team — a rare move that raised eyebrows on its own. He also asked that a different judge oversee any new proceedings, citing doubts about getting a fair hearing from Kaplan. Then he tried to pull the motion entirely. In a message to the court, he told Kaplan he didn’t believe he would get a fair hearing “on this topic in front of you.” That request to withdraw was denied too. Bankman-Fried is currently serving his sentence at a federal prison in Lompoc, California. A separate appeal of his conviction and sentence remains before an appellate court. The jury that convicted him found he had illegally moved billions of dollars in FTX customer funds to Alameda Research, the trading firm he also controlled. Those funds were used for risky trades that helped bring down one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. Featured image from MetaAI, chart from TradingView

29 Apr 2026, 16:35

Kazakh authorities move against top crypto platforms in legality probe

Kazakhstan’s main financial regulator has accused several global crypto exchanges of conducting illegal operations in the country. Obtaining a license is mandatory for all coin trading platforms in the Central Asian nation and international popularity is not accepted as excuse. Leading crypto exchanges banned from trading in Kazakhstan The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued a warning about unlicensed crypto trading, specifically mentioning some of the world’s top players in the sector. Organizing the exchange of digital assets without the appropriate permit, issued in accordance with existing law, is prohibited, the watchdog said in a notice. Under Kazakhstan’s current legislation, such licenses are issued within the legal regime governing the Astana International Financial Center ( AIFC ). The financial hub in the capital city hosts the country’s authorized cryptocurrency exchanges, although Kazakh authorities intend to expand licensing beyond its jurisdiction. A number of unlicensed crypto platforms advertise and promote their services in the Republic of Kazakhstan, the regulator stated Tuesday. These include HTX, Bitget, OKX, and MEXC, the government agency detailed in a press release and reminded: “Only entities licensed by the AFSA are legally authorized to conduct regulated activities in or from the AIFC, including activities linked to digital assets and related services.” The regulatory body then warned that using unlicensed exchanges brings a lot of risks, such as loss of investment, leak of personal data and hacks , lack of protection for consumer rights and potential involvement in fraudulent schemes. The AFSA also noted that just because a crypto exchange is widely known and convenient, that doesn’t mean it has the right to work in Kazakhstan. Quoted by RBC and Bits.media, it insisted: “Even if a platform is considered a global leader, it must be authorized to operate within the jurisdiction of the republic.” The authority admitted it does not maintain a dedicated blacklist of illegal crypto service providers and urged users to check the status of each individual company through its official public register. The latter currently lists 30 companies offering services related to digital assets. Among them are some other prominent names in the industry, like Bybit and Binance, through its local subsidiary, which hold AFSA licenses. Kazakhstan is cracking down on illegal crypto exchange services Already a mining hotspot in Central Asia, Kazakhstan has been making efforts lately to establish itself as a crypto hub in the wider Eurasian region. While the government in Astana is trying to liberalize the market, it is also taking measures to clamp down on illegal activities, including in trading. According to Kazakhstan’s Financial Monitoring Agency (AFM), nearly two dozen illegal crypto exchanges were closed down over the past year. Hundreds of such businesses have been dismantled in previous periods. On Wednesday, the body shared details about its investigation into what has been described as “the largest shadow crypto service in the Commonwealth of Independent States,” the RAKS Exchange . The financial intelligence unit said the platform facilitated transactions worth over $224 million for more than 200 drug shops operating in Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, and Moldova. Quoted by Tengrinews.kz, the AFM revealed its specialists analyzed over 4,000 crypto wallets linked to drug trafficking and activities on darknet marketplaces. When Kazakhstan’s financial and law enforcement authorities busted the exchange in September 2025, they froze 9.7 million USDT of its assets, as reported by Cryptopolitan. The watchdog now announced, 3.2 million Tether have been already confiscated. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

29 Apr 2026, 16:30

Brent Crude Climbs Above $115 as Trump Signals Longer Iran Naval Blockade

President Donald Trump directed aides to prepare for an extended naval blockade of Iranian ports, pushing Brent crude above $115 per barrel on April 29 and widening what the International Energy Agency called the largest supply shock on record. Key Takeaways: Brent crude climbed above $115 per barrel on April 29 as Trump ordered preparations

29 Apr 2026, 16:10

Trump Naval Blockade on Iran Remains Until Nuclear Deal Reached, Administration Confirms

BitcoinWorld Trump Naval Blockade on Iran Remains Until Nuclear Deal Reached, Administration Confirms President Donald Trump has made a decisive statement regarding the ongoing naval blockade on Iran, asserting that the maritime restriction will remain in full effect unless a comprehensive nuclear deal is finalized. This announcement, first reported by Solid Intel, signals a hardening of the US position in the ongoing Middle East tensions. The blockade, a key tool of economic and military pressure, directly impacts Iran’s ability to export oil and import essential goods. Trump Naval Blockade on Iran: A Non-Negotiable Stance The Trump administration’s position is clear: the naval blockade on Iran will not be lifted until Tehran agrees to a new agreement that explicitly addresses its nuclear program. This stance escalates the diplomatic standoff, as previous negotiations had focused on broader sanctions relief. The blockade, enforced by the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, restricts maritime traffic in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. Consequently, Iran faces severe constraints on its primary revenue source—oil exports. According to experts, this approach represents a shift from the previous administration’s strategy. Instead of offering incremental sanctions relief, the current policy demands a complete capitulation on nuclear ambitions before any economic concessions. This creates a high-stakes scenario for both nations. Furthermore, the international community watches closely, as any miscalculation could lead to a broader conflict. Background: The Evolution of US-Iran Tensions Relations between the United States and Iran have deteriorated sharply since the US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018. Following that withdrawal, the Trump administration reimposed crippling economic sanctions. The naval blockade emerged as a further measure to prevent Iranian oil smuggling. Now, the president links the blockade’s removal directly to nuclear negotiations. This timeline highlights key events: 2015: JCPOA signed between Iran and world powers. 2018: US withdraws from the deal, reimposes sanctions. 2020: US kills Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, tensions peak. 2024: Solid Intel reports Trump’s new blockade stance. This sequence of events demonstrates a pattern of escalating pressure. Each step reduces Iran’s economic breathing room. Moreover, the blockade prevents Iran from using maritime routes to circumvent sanctions. Impact on Iran’s Economy and Global Oil Markets The naval blockade on Iran has immediate and profound economic consequences. Iran’s oil exports, which once averaged 2.5 million barrels per day, have plummeted. The blockade effectively closes the Strait of Hormuz to Iranian tankers. As a result, global oil markets face supply uncertainty. Analysts predict that sustained pressure could drive crude prices higher, affecting consumers worldwide. Key economic impacts include: Oil revenue loss: Iran loses billions annually. Inflation: Rial currency devaluation accelerates. Humanitarian goods: Imports of medicine and food face delays. These factors create internal pressure on the Iranian government. Consequently, the regime may face increased public discontent. However, hardliners may use the blockade to rally nationalist sentiment. International Reactions and Diplomatic Fallout Global reactions to Trump’s naval blockade on Iran have been mixed. European allies, including France and Germany, have expressed concern. They argue that the blockade undermines diplomatic channels. Conversely, Israel and Saudi Arabia have privately supported the tough stance. Russia and China have condemned the move, calling it a violation of international maritime law. This division complicates any potential negotiations. Without a unified international front, Iran may exploit differences among world powers. Furthermore, the blockade tests the limits of US naval power in a region where multiple nations have strategic interests. The United Nations has called for restraint, but no binding resolution has been passed. Expert Analysis: What This Means for Nuclear Negotiations Geopolitical analysts view this announcement as a deliberate negotiating tactic. By linking the naval blockade on Iran to nuclear talks, the US creates a binary choice for Tehran: accept a deal or face continued economic strangulation. This approach, known as ‘maximum pressure 2.0,’ aims to force concessions that the previous JCPOA did not secure. Dr. Emily Carter, a Middle East security expert, notes: ‘This strategy removes ambiguity. Iran knows exactly what it must do to relieve pressure. However, it also removes any face-saving exit for Iranian leaders.’ The risk is that Iran may double down on its nuclear program as a bargaining chip. Indeed, recent IAEA reports show increased uranium enrichment levels. Potential Scenarios and Outcomes Several scenarios could unfold from this standoff: Scenario A: Iran agrees to new nuclear restrictions, blockade lifts. Scenario B: Talks collapse, blockade continues indefinitely. Scenario C: Iran attempts to break the blockade militarily, risking conflict. Each outcome carries significant risks. Scenario A would require Iran to accept limits on enrichment, which hardliners oppose. Scenario B could lead to a nuclear-armed Iran. Scenario C could trigger a war. The coming weeks will be critical. Conclusion The Trump administration’s decision to maintain the naval blockade on Iran until a nuclear deal is reached marks a pivotal moment in US-Iran relations. This hardline stance reshapes the diplomatic landscape, forcing a direct link between maritime security and nuclear non-proliferation. As the world watches, the outcome will determine not only Iran’s economic future but also the stability of the entire Middle East region. The blockade remains a powerful lever, but its long-term effectiveness depends on sustained international pressure and Iran’s willingness to negotiate. FAQs Q1: What is the purpose of the naval blockade on Iran? A1: The blockade aims to prevent Iran from exporting oil and importing goods, pressuring the regime to negotiate over its nuclear program. Q2: How does the blockade affect global oil prices? A2: By restricting Iranian oil exports, the blockade reduces global supply, which can lead to higher crude oil prices and increased fuel costs. Q3: Has the blockade been enforced by other countries? A3: Primarily, the US Navy enforces the blockade. Some allies provide logistical support, but most European nations have not directly participated. Q4: What is Iran’s response to the blockade? A4: Iran has condemned the blockade as illegal and has threatened to disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation. Q5: Could the blockade lead to a military conflict? A5: Yes, there is a risk of escalation if Iran attempts to break the blockade or if a naval incident occurs, potentially triggering a broader conflict. This post Trump Naval Blockade on Iran Remains Until Nuclear Deal Reached, Administration Confirms first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

29 Apr 2026, 15:49

Czech Central Bank: BTC Reserve Test Increases Returns

Czech CB President Michl announced that the BTC reserve test increased the yield. In the 1M$ test, BTC outperformed gold, but volatility is high. Technical: Support $73K, Resistance $77K. Central b...