Invest ideasNews
19 Feb 2026, 14:30
Crypto Billionaires On Their Own? Senator Urges US Regulators To Reject Bailouts
US senator Elizabeth Warren has sent a sharp note to regulators, warning against any move that could let public money shore up the crypto market. She argues such steps would hand a windfall to the richest holders in the sector and risk fueling public anger. Reports say her letter was aimed at preventing what she calls an unfair transfer of wealth from everyday taxpayers to well-connected crypto owners. Calls For Clear Boundaries Warren’s message was short on technical detail but heavy on tone. She told officials to avoid buying or guaranteeing crypto assets, and to steer clear of emergency facilities that might prop up prices. Her stance puts political pressure on supervisors who face a choice between market calm and public scrutiny. A Private Forum, A Public Question Reports note that the push came as a new crypto forum was held at Mar-a-Lago, where industry figures and policy allies gathered. The event was hosted by World Liberty Financial , which is linked to US President Donald Trump. That coincidence gave extra weight to worries about conflicts and how any help might look if delivered while a president-linked firm is active in the space. Seized Assets And Limits At a federal oversight meeting, questions were raised about what officials could do. During that session, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was asked pointed questions about whether the Treasury could intervene or use seized assets in ways that would affect markets. He said the government is keeping Bitcoin it obtained through seizures, calling those holdings an asset of the US rather than taxpayer money. The point was pressed by Congressman Brad Sherman, and the discussion took place under the umbrella of the Financial Stability Oversight Council. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was also on the list of recipients of Warren’s letter, reflecting how the issue crosses agencies. Bitcoin Price Movement Bitcoin has recently fallen below important levels of support, with prices falling below $67,000-$70,000 due to risk-off sentiment in the market. The overall risk-off sentiment in the market has been driven by increasing geopolitical tensions, specifically in the Middle East, which has seen Bitcoin prices fall alongside equities and other risk-related assets. Traders are closely observing the current price action as it tests short-term levels of support, which are indicative of the impact of global events on the sentiment of the cryptocurrency market. Despite the challenging environment, some investors have cited the ability of Bitcoin to withstand previous geopolitical events, which have seen overall trends and macro forces re-emerge after periods of initial market volatility. Political Stakes And Public Money Warren frames the debate as a fairness test. Any program designed to steady crypto would, in her view, be felt first by the wealthiest insiders — the exact group she singled out. She warned that even talk of special facilities or guaranteed purchases would inflame voters and create the impression that officials are protecting a narrow economic class. Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView
19 Feb 2026, 14:00
US Jobless Claims Defy Expectations: Resilient 206K Figure Signals Strong Labor Market
BitcoinWorld US Jobless Claims Defy Expectations: Resilient 206K Figure Signals Strong Labor Market WASHINGTON, D.C. — February 2025 brought another surprising data point that underscores the enduring strength of the American labor market. The latest weekly jobless claims report revealed that initial unemployment applications totaled just 206,000 during the second week of February, significantly below economist forecasts of 229,000. This resilient figure continues a pattern of labor market stability that has persisted through multiple economic cycles and now presents complex considerations for monetary policymakers. Understanding the Significance of US Jobless Claims Weekly initial jobless claims represent one of the most timely indicators of labor market health. The Department of Labor releases this data every Thursday, providing nearly real-time insight into employment trends. When workers file for unemployment benefits for the first time, these applications create a sensitive barometer of economic conditions. Consequently, economists and policymakers closely monitor these numbers for early signals of economic shifts. The February 2025 reading of 206,000 claims maintains the remarkable consistency observed throughout the post-pandemic recovery period. For context, historical data shows that claims remained below 300,000 for an unprecedented 110 consecutive weeks before the pandemic disruption. After peaking at nearly 7 million in March 2020, claims have steadily declined, demonstrating the labor market’s remarkable resilience. The Federal Reserve’s Dual Mandate and Labor Data The Federal Reserve maintains a dual mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices. Therefore, labor market indicators like jobless claims directly influence monetary policy decisions. Strong employment data typically supports arguments for maintaining or increasing interest rates to combat inflation. Conversely, weakening employment figures might justify rate cuts to stimulate economic activity. Recent Federal Reserve communications have emphasized data-dependent decision-making. The consistently low jobless claims numbers provide evidence that the labor market remains tight, potentially delaying anticipated rate cuts. This creates tension between the Fed’s employment and inflation objectives, particularly when other economic indicators show mixed signals. Comparative Analysis of Recent Labor Market Trends To fully appreciate the significance of the 206,000 claims figure, we must examine it within broader employment trends. The four-week moving average, which smooths weekly volatility, stood at 212,000 in mid-February 2025. This represents only a marginal increase from the 210,000 average recorded in January 2025. Furthermore, continuing claims—which measure ongoing unemployment benefit recipients—remained stable at approximately 1.86 million. Several factors contribute to this sustained labor market strength: Demographic shifts: An aging population has reduced labor force participation rates, creating structural tightness Industry transformation: The transition to technology-driven sectors has created new employment opportunities Geographic mobility: Remote work arrangements have redistributed employment opportunities across regions Skill mismatches: Employers continue reporting difficulties finding qualified workers in specific sectors The table below illustrates recent jobless claims trends: Period Initial Claims Forecast Variance February Week 2, 2025 206,000 229,000 -23,000 February Week 1, 2025 215,000 220,000 -5,000 January Week 4, 2025 218,000 225,000 -7,000 January Week 3, 2025 212,000 215,000 -3,000 Economic Implications and Market Reactions Financial markets responded immediately to the stronger-than-expected jobless claims data. Treasury yields edged higher as investors adjusted their expectations for Federal Reserve policy. Equity markets showed mixed reactions, with sectors sensitive to interest rates experiencing pressure while cyclical sectors benefited from the positive economic signal. The bond market’s reaction proved particularly instructive. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note increased by approximately 5 basis points following the release. This movement reflected growing expectations that the Federal Reserve might maintain its current policy stance for longer than previously anticipated. Meanwhile, the dollar strengthened against major currencies as the data reinforced perceptions of relative U.S. economic strength. Sector-Specific Employment Dynamics Not all industries experience uniform employment conditions. The technology sector has shown particular resilience despite earlier concerns about over-hiring. Manufacturing employment has remained stable, supported by reshoring initiatives and infrastructure investments. The healthcare sector continues to demonstrate strong demand for workers, driven by demographic trends and technological advancements. Service industries, including hospitality and retail, have shown more variability in employment patterns. These sectors remain sensitive to consumer spending patterns and seasonal fluctuations. However, even these traditionally volatile segments have maintained relatively stable employment levels compared to historical norms. Historical Context and Future Projections The current labor market strength represents a continuation of trends established during the economic recovery following the pandemic disruption. Historical analysis reveals that jobless claims have remained below 250,000 for 85% of weeks since January 2023. This consistency contrasts sharply with the volatility observed during previous economic cycles. Looking forward, economists project several potential scenarios for labor market development: Baseline scenario: Gradual normalization with claims stabilizing between 200,000-225,000 Upside scenario: Further strengthening with claims potentially dropping below 200,000 Downside scenario: Moderate softening with claims rising toward 250,000 Each scenario carries different implications for monetary policy, wage growth, and economic expansion. The Federal Reserve will continue monitoring not only jobless claims but also complementary indicators including job openings, quit rates, and wage growth to form a comprehensive assessment of labor market conditions. Expert Perspectives on Labor Market Sustainability Labor economists emphasize that sustainable employment growth requires alignment between workforce skills and employer needs. Educational institutions and training programs have increasingly focused on developing relevant competencies. Meanwhile, employers have demonstrated greater flexibility in hiring requirements and training investments. Demographic analysts note that population aging will continue exerting upward pressure on wages as the labor supply gradually contracts. This structural factor may support continued labor market tightness even during periods of economic moderation. Consequently, policymakers must consider both cyclical and structural elements when formulating employment strategies. Conclusion The February 2025 US jobless claims data provides compelling evidence of ongoing labor market resilience. The 206,000 initial claims figure, significantly below forecasts, reinforces perceptions of economic strength and presents complex considerations for monetary policy. As the Federal Reserve balances its dual mandate, employment indicators will remain crucial inputs for decision-making. The consistent performance of jobless claims suggests that labor market conditions may support continued economic expansion while potentially complicating inflation management efforts. Market participants and policymakers alike will monitor subsequent releases for confirmation of these trends and indications of future direction. FAQs Q1: What are initial jobless claims and why do they matter? Initial jobless claims represent the number of individuals filing for unemployment benefits for the first time during a given week. They matter because they provide one of the most timely indicators of labor market health, offering insights into employment trends before other data becomes available. Q2: How does the Federal Reserve use jobless claims data? The Federal Reserve uses jobless claims data as part of its assessment of labor market conditions. Strong claims data (lower numbers) suggests a tight labor market, which might justify maintaining or raising interest rates to combat inflation. Weak claims data (higher numbers) might support arguments for lowering rates to stimulate employment. Q3: What does a reading of 206,000 claims indicate about the economy? A reading of 206,000 initial jobless claims indicates continued labor market strength. This figure is below both the forecast of 229,000 and the historical average, suggesting that employers are retaining workers and layoffs remain limited despite economic uncertainties. Q4: How do jobless claims relate to other employment indicators? Jobless claims provide high-frequency data that complements monthly employment reports. While the monthly jobs report offers comprehensive employment figures, weekly claims provide more timely signals of changes in labor market conditions. Analysts typically consider claims alongside job openings, hiring rates, and wage growth for a complete picture. Q5: What factors could cause jobless claims to increase in the future? Several factors could increase jobless claims, including economic slowdowns, sector-specific disruptions, technological displacement, or external shocks. Seasonal adjustments, policy changes, and demographic shifts might also influence claims data over time. This post US Jobless Claims Defy Expectations: Resilient 206K Figure Signals Strong Labor Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
19 Feb 2026, 13:55
Sam Bankman-Fried Conviction Overturned: A Stunning Legal Reversal for Crypto
BitcoinWorld Sam Bankman-Fried Conviction Overturned: A Stunning Legal Reversal for Crypto In a stunning legal reversal with profound implications for cryptocurrency regulation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has overturned the conviction of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried. This pivotal decision, announced in New York on April 2, 2025, centers on the appellate court’s finding that the trial judge improperly excluded key evidence. Consequently, the ruling immediately reignites complex debates about legal standards in high-profile financial technology cases. Sam Bankman-Fried Conviction Overturned on Evidentiary Grounds The Second Circuit’s opinion focused squarely on procedural fairness. The court determined that Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who presided over the original trial, committed significant error. Specifically, Judge Kaplan blocked the admission of several pieces of evidence that Bankman-Fried’s defense team deemed crucial. This evidence reportedly aimed to demonstrate that FTX’s operational practices aligned with broader industry standards at the time. Furthermore, the excluded material allegedly showed that lawyers drafted and approved the company’s foundational structures and contracts. Bankman-Fried publicly addressed the decision on the social media platform X. He stated the appeals court acknowledged the trial judge repeatedly blocked his testimony. Additionally, he claimed the court excluded all relevant evidence at the government’s request. The defendant welcomed the decision as a necessary correction to these procedural issues. Legal experts note that appellate courts generally defer to trial judges on evidentiary rulings. Therefore, an overturn on these grounds signals a potentially serious misapplication of judicial discretion. The Core Legal Argument and Excluded Evidence The defense’s central argument hinged on context. They sought to introduce evidence portraying FTX’s actions as consistent with a nascent and loosely regulated industry. For instance, they intended to show that common industry practices did not inherently threaten corporate solvency. The prosecution, however, successfully argued to the trial judge that such evidence was irrelevant. They maintained it did not directly address the specific charges of fraud and conspiracy. The appellate panel disagreed with this narrow interpretation. Their ruling suggests the jury should have been allowed to consider the full context of FTX’s operations. A key piece of excluded testimony involved the role of external legal counsel. Bankman-Fried’s team wanted to demonstrate that sophisticated law firms designed the very financial structures later deemed fraudulent. This “advice-of-counsel” defense, while not a complete shield, can impact a jury’s assessment of intent—a critical element in fraud cases. Industry Standard Evidence: Documentation showing common practices in crypto exchanges circa 2020-2022. Solvency Arguments: Internal analyses and expert testimony arguing FTX’s model was solvent until a specific bank run. Legal Approval: Records of contracts and corporate structures reviewed and approved by major law firms. Expert Analysis on the Ruling’s Precedential Weight Renowned legal scholars and former federal prosecutors are now dissecting the opinion’s long-term impact. Professor Eleanor Vance, a securities law expert at Stanford Law School, provided context. “This isn’t just about one defendant,” she explained. “The Second Circuit is setting a boundary for how courts handle complex financial technology cases. The ruling emphasizes that juries must understand the ecosystem in which alleged misconduct occurs.” She further noted that the decision could empower defense teams in future crypto-related prosecutions to push for broader admissibility of industry-context evidence. Conversely, some analysts see risks. Former SEC enforcement attorney Michael Choi cautioned, “While ensuring a fair trial is paramount, this ruling may create a ‘gray area’ defense for bad actors. They could argue their misconduct was just ‘standard practice’ in a wild industry.” The balance between fair context and the specifics of alleged lawbreaking will likely be a focal point in the retrial. Timeline of the FTX Legal Saga Understanding this appeal requires revisiting the case’s chronology. The collapse of FTX in November 2022 triggered one of the most rapid and extensive financial fraud investigations in recent history. Date Event Nov 2022 FTX files for bankruptcy; DOJ and SEC launch investigations. Dec 2022 Bahamian authorities arrest Sam Bankman-Fried at the U.S. government’s request. Oct 2023 Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial begins in the Southern District of New York. Nov 2023 Jury finds Bankman-Fried guilty on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy. Mar 2024 Judge Kaplan sentences Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison. Apr 2024 Defense files appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Apr 2025 Second Circuit overturns conviction, remands case for a new trial. Immediate Impacts and Market Reactions The news sent immediate ripples through financial and crypto markets. While Bankman-Fried remains in custody pending the government’s likely appeal to the Supreme Court or the new trial proceedings, the ruling introduces significant uncertainty. Legal observers predict a protracted process. The Department of Justice must now decide whether to retry the case, potentially with a different strategy, or seek a plea deal. For the cryptocurrency industry, the ruling is a double-edged sword. Some view it as a check against perceived regulatory overreach, affirming that crypto businesses deserve a fair contextual defense. Others worry it undermines the finality of justice in a sector desperate for legitimacy and clear rules. The price of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum showed minor volatility on the news, reflecting the market’s digested understanding that the core facts of FTX’s collapse remain unchanged. The Road to a Retrial: What Comes Next? The case now returns to the lower court. The Second Circuit’s mandate instructs the district court to conduct a new trial consistent with its evidentiary rulings. This process will involve extensive new pre-trial motions as both sides adjust their strategies. The prosecution may streamline its case, while the defense will aggressively seek to introduce the previously barred evidence. Judge Kaplan could potentially recuse himself, though there is no automatic requirement for him to do so. The scheduling of a new trial could take many months, if not over a year, ensuring this legal saga continues to unfold. Conclusion The overturning of Sam Bankman-Fried’s conviction represents a monumental development in the intersection of law and financial technology. This decision underscores the critical importance of procedural fairness and the admissibility of contextual evidence in complex financial trials. While the factual allegations against Bankman-Fried and FTX remain severe, the appeals court has mandated that a jury must evaluate those facts within the full framework of the industry’s operational norms. The path forward guarantees further legal scrutiny, setting precedents that will influence cryptocurrency regulation and high-stakes financial litigation for years to come. The final chapter of the Sam Bankman-Fried conviction story is yet to be written. FAQs Q1: What was the main reason the appeals court overturned Sam Bankman-Fried’s conviction? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the trial judge improperly excluded key evidence. This evidence aimed to show FTX’s practices aligned with industry standards and were legally approved, which the defense argued was vital for context. Q2: Does this ruling mean Sam Bankman-Fried is free? No. The ruling vacates the conviction and sentences, but the case is remanded for a new trial. Bankman-Fried remains in custody pending further legal proceedings, which could include a retrial or potential appeals to the Supreme Court. Q3: What happens next in the legal process? The case returns to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Department of Justice must decide whether to retry the case. Both sides will file new pre-trial motions, and a new trial date will be set, a process that could take many months. Q4: How does this ruling affect the broader cryptocurrency industry? The ruling establishes a significant legal precedent. It suggests courts must allow juries to consider the context of industry standards in crypto cases. This could empower other defendants but also creates uncertainty for regulators seeking clear enforcement boundaries. Q5: Can the government appeal this appeals court decision? Yes. The Department of Justice can request a rehearing before the full Second Circuit court (en banc) or file a petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court accepts very few cases, making a retrial the more likely immediate outcome. This post Sam Bankman-Fried Conviction Overturned: A Stunning Legal Reversal for Crypto first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
19 Feb 2026, 13:05
Evernorth CEO Makes Big XRP Progress Statement, XRP Army Reacts
A quiet shift is unfolding across the digital-asset landscape as institutional players move from observation to participation. For years, XRP’s long-term narrative depended on regulatory clarity, scalable infrastructure, and credible capital entry. Those pillars now appear to be aligning, prompting renewed debate about whether the asset is approaching a structural turning point rather than another speculative cycle. Information shared by BankXRP highlights recent remarks from Asheesh Birla, the chief executive of Evernorth , who described a moment in which regulation, decentralized-finance growth, and institutional readiness are converging around the XRP ecosystem. He emphasized that moving traditional financial services—such as lending, payments, and trading—onto blockchain infrastructure can improve liquidity, reduce friction, and expand global access to capital. Evernorth CEO on XRP’s Institutional Breakthrough “I’ve been waiting for this moment around XRP… everything is aligning.” • Nasdaq listing as $XRPN (Q1 2026) • First regulated XRP treasury model • 388M+ XRP deployed to XRPL yield & DeFi • XRP as core balance sheet asset… pic.twitter.com/dFXavj7iGl — 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP (@BankXRP) February 19, 2026 Building an Institutional XRP Treasury Evernorth positions itself as an active institutional steward rather than a passive holder of digital assets. The firm has assembled a large XRP-denominated treasury and plans to deploy those holdings into yield-generating opportunities across the XRP Ledger’s developing DeFi environment. This strategy aims to stimulate on-chain activity while producing sustainable institutional returns, reinforcing the broader utility of XRP within financial markets. Observers increasingly compare this treasury-driven approach to the balance-sheet strategy pioneered by Strategy , which transformed corporate engagement with Bitcoin. While XRP’s market structure differs, the comparison reflects a shared principle: sustained institutional allocation can reshape perception, liquidity, and long-term valuation. Regulation, Infrastructure, and Market Timing The conclusion of Ripple’s multi-year legal conflict with U.S. regulators in 2025 removed one of the largest barriers to institutional adoption. That resolution provided clearer compliance boundaries and allowed financial firms to evaluate XRP without unresolved legal risk. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 At the same time, developers have continued expanding DeFi capabilities and validator participation across the XRP Ledger, strengthening the ecosystem’s operational foundation. Evernorth’s expected public-market pathway , including a planned association with Nasdaq, signals another structural evolution. A regulated, treasury-focused vehicle tied to XRP would give institutions familiar access to exposure while supporting deeper capital integration into on-chain finance. Community Reaction and Strategic Outlook Members of the XRP community have interpreted these developments as the possible beginning of a new institutional era. Many supporters argue that once balance-sheet adoption begins, narrative momentum can accelerate quickly, shifting XRP’s role from a speculative asset to a financial infrastructure. Evernorth’s long-term impact will depend on execution, regulatory stability, and measurable capital deployment into XRP-based financial products. Even so, the conversation itself marks meaningful progress. Institutions increasingly discuss XRP in strategic—not speculative—terms, suggesting that the ecosystem may be entering one of the most consequential phases in its history. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Evernorth CEO Makes Big XRP Progress Statement, XRP Army Reacts appeared first on Times Tabloid .
19 Feb 2026, 12:57
Bundesbank President Wants Euro-Pegged Stablecoins to Prevent Dollarization
ECB Governing Council member Joachim Nagel argued a wholesale CBDC and euro-pegged stablecoins could boost the euro’s international role.
19 Feb 2026, 11:30
Russia drafts penalties for illegal crypto use amid calls to fast-track legalization
Russia’s monetary authority is behind a new proposal to punish those conducting unregulated operations with cryptocurrencies in the country. The news coincides with a call for accelerated adoption of regulations legalizing transactions with digital assets issued by a major Russian bank. The authorities in Moscow intend to approve the respective legislation by the summer, with some analysts predicting Russia will then block foreign exchanges. Bank of Russia suggests measures to prevent unauthorized crypto activities The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) considers it necessary to prosecute cryptocurrency operations carried out outside the legal framework. Governor Elvira Nabiullina made that clear in statements on the matter, quoted by Russian media and local crypto news outlets on Wednesday. Speaking during a forum devoted to financial cybersecurity, the head of the regulator highlighted the main motive for this stance: “Fraudsters are taking advantage of the gray market … A systemic solution is, of course, regulating cryptocurrency with the introduction of liability for transactions outside the regulated segment.” “Such changes are currently being prepared. We have made our proposals and are discussing them with the government,” the CBR Chair added, according to a report by the official TASS news agency. Russians who sell cryptocurrency are often blacklisted with their bank transactions suspended, Nabiullina also pointed out. The reason is simple – the money they receive in exchange is sometimes stemming from fraud and theft committed by scammers, she explained. “Essentially, these cryptocurrency sellers become unwitting participants in fraudulent schemes,” the head of the monetary authority elaborated. In less than three months, more than 1,800 such persons have contacted Russian law enforcement agencies with requests to have their access to banking services restored, Rossiyskaya Gazeta revealed on Thursday. Many among them were people who sold crypto and found themselves added to a state-maintained database for suspicious transactions, the government-issued newspaper noted in report from the same “Cybersecurity in Finance” event held in the city of Yekaterinburg. Leading Russian bank urges speedy cryptocurrency legalization Meanwhile, the head of Russia’s second-largest bank used his participation in the conference to call on authorities to speed up the legalization of crypto transactions, particularly payments. According to Andrey Kostin, CEO of VTB, formerly Vneshtorgbank, a significant number of clients, including major exporters, are now asking for payment options using cryptocurrency. The chief executive of the majority state-owned institution emphasized this is unavoidable, suggesting regulations must be introduced as quickly as possible, as per a report by the Gazeta[.]ru portal. The sanctioned Russian bank is among those that plan to enter the crypto market once it’s regulated. Last year, it announced plans to launch crypto trading via brokerage accounts. Using decentralized digital money for international settlements has been a key driver behind Russia’s turn towards crypto legalization in 2026. In October, the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank agreed to legalize cryptocurrency payments in foreign trade to help Russian firms bypass fiat restrictions imposed by the West over the war in Ukraine. Moscow now wants to replace an “experimental legal regime” for such transactions with a full-fledged legal framework for crypto activities, including investment and trading. It will be based on the new regulatory concept proposed by the CBR in late December, which envisages recognizing cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as “monetary assets,” as reported by Cryptopolitan. At the forum in Yekaterinburg, the Chairman of the parliamentary Financial Markets Committee Anatoly Aksakov also urged to quickly put the crypto market in order. He stated: “We need to introduce the bill faster, because this is one of the areas where people lose a lot, and it is not regulated properly.” Meanwhile, industry watchers warned that Russian regulators may cut access to global crypto trading platforms as soon as the country regulates its own market. Interviewed by the business news outlet RBC this week, they believe that established foreign exchanges like Bybit or OKX may be blocked by the end of the year. Nikita Zuborev, senior analyst at the crypto exchange aggregator Bestchange[.]ru, expects this to happen after Russia starts licensing domestic crypto service providers. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
