hodler

13 Feb 2026, 11:00

HSBC To Power Pilot Issuance Of UK Digital Bonds – Details

The UK government has tapped HSBC’s blockchain platform to run a pilot for issuing digital government bonds, called the Digital Gilt Instrument, or DIGIT. The move marks a concrete step toward testing whether blockchain technology can improve efficiency in sovereign debt markets. Reports say legal support for the program will be provided by Ashurst LLP, underlining the complexity of putting a regulated tokenised issuance into practice. Pilot Program Aims To Explore On-Chain Settlement According to reports, the pilot will issue short-dated digital gilts within a sandbox environment supervised by the UK’s financial regulators. That setup allows officials to test issuance, transfer, and settlement processes on a distributed ledger while keeping the main debt system unchanged. HSBC’s Orion platform has previously supported tokenized bond projects abroad and was chosen because it can handle transactions at scale. The government describes the pilot as a means for it to test what works, spot areas for potential savings, and clear up the legality of a fresh type of bond issue. Today we’ve taken an important step towards issuing ’s 1st Digital Gilt Instrument DIGIT will: Enable faster & more efficient transactions Reduce costs for firms Enhance security across our financial system https://t.co/xu5MhnIKtC — Lucy Rigby KC MP (@LucyRigby) February 12, 2026 According to UK Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Lucy Rigby, “Today we’ve taken an important step towards issuing GB’s 1st Digital Gilt Instrument.” Rigby pointed out that she looks forward to “working with HSBC and other parties to deliver DIGIT.” Timing And Procurement Process There has been talk of having a digital gilt for months, and that has put the pilot back from the original expectations. According to sources , the extra time has given the Treasury an opportunity to assess various proposals from different companies: HSBC, the London Stock Exchange, and fintech companies. The decision appears to be a reflection of the conservative approach the regulators would like to take, as well as the government’s intent of avoiding surprises in tokenized debt trialing. According to reports, the pilot bonds used in this process have to replicate realistic issuance circumstances without jeopardizing market stability. Goals And Metrics Of The Pilot The program will focus on several practical measures: settlement speed, custody arrangements, secondary market accessibility, and reconciliation of on-chain records with central books. Reports have disclosed that authorities will closely monitor how automated processes handle bond lifecycles and any taxable events that arise. The results will determine whether the technology is robust enough for wider adoption and whether operational or legal frameworks need adjustment before scaling. Banks and investors are watching the pilot carefully. They want systems that plug into existing Treasury and clearing operations without adding unnecessary risk. Reports say the pilot could set the stage for broader use of tokenized debt in the UK, though uptake will depend on measurable efficiency gains rather than novelty. The government sees this as part of a broader effort to maintain the UK’s competitiveness in capital markets and to attract both domestic and international investment. Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

13 Feb 2026, 10:34

Michael Burry explains why he’s betting against Palantir in 10,000 words

Michael Burry is betting against Palantir again, and he wrote more than 10,000 words explaining why. He published the essay on Substack on Thursday. In November, Michael disclosed put options against Palantir and Nvidia. That means he makes money if those stocks fall. He believes Palantir is overpriced right now. Michael did not start with numbers. He started with Alex Karp. Alex is the chief executive of Palantir . In The Philosopher in the Valley, written by Michael Steinberger, Alex is quoted saying, “You think it is helpful having a fluorescent green praying mantis coming into their offices telling them about German philosophy? Do you think that’s helpful? I can tell you it’s not helpful.” Peter said, “My riff on Alex is that he’s working out some psychological issues where he has to do things in this really, really hard way versus the straightforward, easy way.” Michael wrote that his criticism is not personal. He made it clear that:- “I have spent some time with Peter. I like him a lot. He’s a great guy. I have not met Alex, but the book made me appreciate him.” Burry digs out Palantir’s history of losses and heavy spending to make his case Before going public in late 2020, Palantir had a strong reputation in Washington and Silicon Valley. It worked with government agencies and powerful partners. At the same time, it was losing serious money. When Palantir filed its S-1 in the summer of 2020, the numbers became public. As of June 30, 2020, Palantir had lost $3.96 billion in total. In 2018 and 2019 combined, it lost $1.2 billion. Funding rounds were large. The biggest was Series K in 2019. It raised $899 million at $11.38 per share. Between financings, the company used revolving lines of credit to support cash flow. In August 2020, just before the direct listing, the board awarded Alex $1.1 billion in stock options. Michael wrote, “If you have not realized it by now, the company really knows how to throw money around.” Burry challenges the AI platform and the $300 billion valuation Palantir was founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel and other Silicon Valley entrepreneurs with a mission to build software that helps governments, militaries, and corporations process large data sets. In 2023, Palantir launched its Artificial Intelligence Platform, a system that allegedly connects large language models from OpenAI and Anthropic to customer data. Since then, revenue growth has been steady for Palantir. Last year, the Thiel-backed company reported $4.5 billion in annual sales. That was up 56% from the year before. The stock surged about 450% over the past two years. The company now has a market value near $300 billion. Wall Street analysts rate it overweight on average, based on MarketWatch data. When Michael revealed his short position last year, Alex responded publicly. He called betting against AI companies “making all the money” “super-weird” and “batshit crazy.” Michael disagrees with the optimism. He argues that Palantir relies on third-party language models that are “systematically unreliable.” He cited a Stanford University paper that described reasoning failures in large language models. He wrote that this matters for “legal reasoning, scientific reasoning, medical decision support, military targeting, and other truly mission critical tasks requiring 100 per cent precision and confidence grounded in real data.” Burry points to uneven growth and predicts a lower valuation Michael also wrote that many chief executives feel pressure to show they are using AI. That pressure drives demand for Palantir software today. He warned that over time, AI tools could make data integration cheap enough for companies to handle on their own. He named Salesforce and Microsoft as well-funded competitors. He wrote, “They may pounce before or after savvy customers realise Emperor Palantir has no clothes.” Michael examined regional growth numbers. U.S. commercial revenue rose 137% last year. International commercial revenue increased only 2%. He argued this suggests the business depends on engineers and close relationships on the ground. He said that looks more like consulting than pure SaaS. Michael ended with a direct forecast. He wrote that the recent winning streak will not endure. He predicted the company will prove to be worth less than $100 billion. For now, the market prices Palantir far above that level. Michael is positioned for the opposite outcome. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

13 Feb 2026, 10:05

USD CPI Analysis: Navigating the Critical Inflation Crossroads for 2025 Markets

BitcoinWorld USD CPI Analysis: Navigating the Critical Inflation Crossroads for 2025 Markets Global currency markets exhibited cautious positioning on Wednesday, March 12, 2025, as the U.S. dollar demonstrated a slight bid tone ahead of the crucial Consumer Price Index (CPI) release. Market participants globally are scrutinizing inflation data for signals about Federal Reserve monetary policy direction. This movement reflects broader concerns about persistent price pressures and their implications for interest rates. USD CPI Analysis: Understanding Pre-Release Market Dynamics Traders typically adjust positions before major economic announcements. Consequently, the dollar’s modest strength suggests expectations for potentially firm inflation readings. Market analysts note this pattern often precedes data that could influence Federal Reserve decisions. Historical data shows similar movements before previous CPI releases throughout 2024. Several factors contribute to this cautious dollar positioning. First, recent labor market data showed continued resilience. Second, commodity prices have displayed volatility in early 2025. Third, geopolitical developments continue affecting global supply chains. Therefore, market participants are preparing for multiple potential outcomes from the inflation report. The Inflation Measurement Framework The Bureau of Labor Statistics calculates CPI by tracking price changes for a basket of consumer goods and services. This basket includes categories like housing, transportation, food, and medical care. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy components, receives particular attention from policymakers. Federal Reserve officials consistently reference this metric in their communications. Federal Reserve Policy and Inflation Targets The Federal Reserve maintains a dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Since 2020, the central bank has employed a flexible average inflation targeting framework. This approach allows inflation to run moderately above 2% for some time following periods of undershooting. However, sustained elevated readings prompt policy adjustments. Recent Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statements emphasize data dependence. Officials require convincing evidence of inflation returning sustainably to 2% before considering rate cuts. Therefore, each CPI report carries significant weight for monetary policy expectations. Market pricing for future rate moves fluctuates with each data release. Recent CPI Trends and Market Reactions Release Date Headline CPI Core CPI USD Reaction February 2025 3.1% 3.7% +0.4% January 2025 3.2% 3.9% +0.8% December 2024 3.4% 3.8% +0.6% Expert Perspectives on Current Conditions ING Bank analysts note specific factors influencing current market positioning. Their research highlights shelter costs and services inflation as persistent components. Additionally, they point to wage growth trends affecting service sector pricing. These elements contribute to expectations for gradual disinflation rather than rapid declines. Other institutions echo similar cautious outlooks. For instance, Goldman Sachs economists project a bumpy path toward 2% inflation. Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley analysts emphasize the importance of monthly sequential changes. These细微 differences in methodology lead to varied market interpretations. Global Currency Market Implications The dollar’s role as the world’s primary reserve currency magnifies CPI impacts. Major currency pairs like EUR/USD and USD/JPY typically show heightened volatility around releases. Emerging market currencies often experience amplified movements due to dollar strength effects. Consequently, global traders monitor U.S. inflation data closely. Several transmission channels exist for these effects. First, interest rate differentials influence capital flows between countries. Second, risk sentiment affects carry trade dynamics. Third, commodity prices respond to dollar valuation changes. Thus, the dollar’s pre-CPI movement signals broader market positioning. Interest Rate Expectations: Market-implied probabilities for Fed moves adjust with inflation data Risk Appetite: Higher inflation readings typically dampen risk sentiment temporarily Carry Trades: Dollar funding costs impact popular currency strategies Hedging Activity: Corporations adjust currency hedges based on volatility expectations Historical Context and Pattern Recognition Analysis of the past decade reveals consistent patterns around CPI releases. The dollar tends to strengthen before releases when consensus expects firm data. Conversely, it often weakens when analysts anticipate soft readings. This pattern reflects positioning adjustments rather than fundamental shifts initially. The 2023-2024 period demonstrated particular sensitivity to inflation surprises. Notably, the dollar surged 1.5% following the April 2024 CPI surprise. Similarly, it declined 0.9% after the July 2024 cooler-than-expected reading. These movements substantially impacted global currency valuations. Economic Indicators and Intermarket Relationships CPI data doesn’t exist in isolation within economic analysis. Several related indicators provide context for inflation trends. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index serves as the Fed’s preferred gauge. Producer Price Index (PPI) data offers insights into pipeline pressures. Employment cost indices reveal wage inflation components. Furthermore, inflation expectations metrics influence actual price dynamics. The University of Michigan survey tracks consumer inflation expectations. Meanwhile, market-based measures like breakeven rates derive from Treasury securities. These indicators collectively shape the inflation narrative that drives policy. Intermarket relationships demonstrate CPI’s broad influence. Treasury yields typically rise with higher inflation readings. Equity markets often react negatively to surprises that suggest prolonged tightening. Commodity prices show complex relationships depending on dollar effects versus demand implications. Technical Analysis Perspectives Chart analysts identify key levels for dollar index (DXY) movements. The 105.50 level represents recent resistance, while 104.20 provides support. Breakouts from these levels often follow significant data surprises. Momentum indicators like RSI and MACD show positioning extremes before events. Currency-specific charts reveal similar patterns. EUR/USD maintains a 1.0750-1.0950 range ahead of major data. USD/JPY shows sensitivity to both U.S. data and Bank of Japan policy expectations. These technical frameworks help traders manage risk around volatile events. Long-Term Structural Factors Influencing Inflation Beyond monthly fluctuations, structural elements shape inflation’s trajectory. Demographic shifts affect labor market dynamics and consumption patterns. Technological advancements create disinflationary pressures in some sectors. Globalization trends continue evolving amid geopolitical realignments. Climate change considerations increasingly influence price dynamics. Transition policies affect energy costs and agricultural production. Supply chain reconfiguration creates both inflationary and disinflationary effects. These structural factors complicate short-term inflation forecasting. Monetary policy frameworks themselves continue evolving. Central bank communication strategies affect how markets interpret data. Forward guidance mechanisms shape expectations formation. These institutional factors create feedback loops between data releases and market reactions. Regional Comparisons and Divergences Global inflation trends show significant regional variation. Eurozone inflation has followed different timing than U.S. patterns. Japanese price dynamics reflect unique domestic circumstances. Emerging markets face distinct inflationary challenges and policy responses. These divergences create trading opportunities based on relative central bank policies. The Federal Reserve often leads other major banks in policy cycles. However, synchronization has decreased in recent years. Consequently, currency movements reflect both absolute and relative policy expectations. Risk Management Strategies for Market Participants Professional traders employ specific approaches around high-impact events. Position sizing adjustments reduce exposure to volatility spikes. Option strategies like straddles capture movement regardless of direction. Stop-loss orders protect against adverse price gaps following releases. Fundamental investors focus on longer-term implications rather than immediate reactions. They analyze whether data changes the broader inflation narrative. Policy path adjustments matter more than single data points for this group. Their reactions often differ from short-term trader responses. Corporate treasury departments implement hedging programs around known events. They balance transaction cost considerations with protection needs. Natural hedging through operational adjustments complements financial instruments. These practical considerations affect aggregate market flows. Conclusion The dollar’s slight bid ahead of CPI data reflects nuanced market positioning amid uncertain inflation trends. This USD CPI analysis highlights the complex interplay between data releases, policy expectations, and currency valuations. Market participants continue navigating evolving inflation dynamics while assessing Federal Reserve responses. Ultimately, sustained inflation moderation remains crucial for policy normalization and currency stability. The March 2025 release adds another data point to this ongoing assessment of price pressures in the U.S. economy. FAQs Q1: Why does the dollar often move before CPI data releases? Market participants position based on expectations and consensus forecasts. They adjust exposures to manage risk from potential surprises, creating price movements before official releases. Q2: What components of CPI matter most for currency markets? Core CPI (excluding food and energy) receives primary attention because it better reflects underlying inflation trends. Services inflation and shelter costs particularly influence policy expectations. Q3: How quickly do markets react to CPI surprises? Reactions typically occur within seconds through algorithmic trading. However, full absorption of implications takes hours as analysts interpret details and assess policy implications. Q4: Do other economic indicators affect dollar movements around CPI? Yes, recent labor data, retail sales, and manufacturing surveys provide context. Federal Reserve communications before releases also influence positioning and interpretations. Q5: How long do CPI-driven currency movements typically last? Initial volatility often lasts 2-4 hours. Sustained trends develop if data meaningfully changes the policy outlook. Otherwise, markets frequently revert to previous ranges within days. This post USD CPI Analysis: Navigating the Critical Inflation Crossroads for 2025 Markets first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

13 Feb 2026, 09:40

Russia says it has no immediate plans to block Google

Russian authorities are not currently considering blocking Google in the country, officials in Moscow indicated amid measures to restrict its video-sharing platform YouTube. The statements also come against the backdrop of the full blocking of Meta’s WhatsApp in Russia and attempts to slow down the popular messenger Telegram, used by millions of Russians. Google ban to affect majority of Russian smartphones running on Android Russia has no immediate plans to block the world’s leading search engine, Google, announced Anton Gorelkin, first deputy chairman of the Committee on Information Policy at the State Duma, the lower house of Russian parliament. “As for big statements about bans, there are in fact no such plans. I specifically asked the regulators about it,” Gorelkin wrote in a post on Russia’s “national” messenger Max. Quoted by the official Russian news agency TASS on Thursday, the lawmaker explained: “A ban would clearly entail an entire set of negative consequences, primarily affecting the performance of the Android operating system, on which 60% of Russians’ smartphones run.” The lawmaker then acknowledged that a move like that is unlikely to make Google pay the fines imposed in lawsuits filed by Russian firms against the American company. “Especially because the story is not over yet as hearings continue in foreign courts and various legal mechanisms are being employed,” the deputy elaborated. Even if the fines cannot be collected in full, if Google is spared a Russian blockade, the parties in these cases would still be able to reach an agreement on reasonable terms, Gorelkin pointed out. If Russia ever moves to abandon Google services, it should do that gradually, he suggested, adding that, in his view, “legislative conditions need to be created for a smooth transition to domestic solutions.” Cutting access to Google deemed feasible but inappropriate Blocking Google in Russia is currently inappropriate, according to Andrey Svintsov, another deputy chairman of the same committee at the Duma. Speaking to the Govorit Moskva radio, he noted that while this is possible in terms of technology, there’s no reason to do that at the present time, elaborating: “In my opinion, it is quite technically feasible. I’m not sure it’s necessary right now.” He reminded that Russia’s telecom watchdog, Roskomnadzor (RKN), is also counting on Google’s return to Russia to collect money from the company for the fines it has imposed. YouTube bears full brunt of Russian restrictions Meanwhile, Google’s sister company YouTube was among those affected by the latest punitive measures taken by the regulator against foreign-based internet platforms. Earlier this week, its domain was removed from Roskomnadzor’s DNS servers, effectively cutting access to the leading video-sharing platform, traffic to which had been already throttled down. Both Google and YouTube, which is the planet’s second-largest search engine, are owned by the U.S. tech giant Alphabet Inc. The same happened with WhatsApp , the messaging service of the owner of the social media networks Facebook and Instagram, Meta. The latter has been designated as an “extremist” organization in Russia. Meanwhile, the Telegram messenger, which is used by millions in Russia, including institutions and officials, was slowed down. RKN limited voice calls through both apps in August. In all recent cases, incompliance with Russian law was cited as the main reason for the measures. In a broad interview with TASS, the Kremlin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov insisted that the full services of the messengers may be restored only after they start complying with Moscow’s terms, while he also pitched the state-approved Max as an alternative. At the same time, a report by the business news portal RBC, quoting experts in the field, revealed that Russia’s firewall simply doesn’t have the capacity to block all these major platforms at once. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

13 Feb 2026, 09:30

XRP Ledger Activates Token Escrow: Here’s What XLS-85 Unlocks

The XRP Ledger has activated Token Escrow (XLS-85) on mainnet on Feb.12, extending the network’s native escrow mechanics beyond XRP to Trustline-based tokens (IOUs) and Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs). The amendment was enabled today with 88% consensus (30/34 validators) and was introduced in rippled v2.5.0 under the XLS-85 specification. Escrow, But For Every Asset On XRP Ledger RippleX framed the change as a broadening of XRPL’s settlement primitives from one native asset to the wider token stack via X: “Token Escrow (XLS-85) is now live on XRPL Mainnet! This feature extends native escrow functionality beyond XRP to all Trustline-based tokens (IOUs) and Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs) . From stablecoins like RLUSD to Real World Assets, the XRPL now supports secure, conditional, onchain settlement for all assets.” It added: “The toolbox for Institutional DeFi just got bigger.” Token Escrow (XLS-85) is now live on XRPL Mainnet! This feature extends native escrow functionality beyond XRP to all Trustline-based tokens (IOUs) and Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs). From stablecoins like RLUSD to Real World Assets, the XRPL now supports secure, conditional,… pic.twitter.com/DNCJxZsoK2 — RippleX (@RippleXDev) February 12, 2026 XRPL.org describes escrow in familiar terms , then emphasizes what the ledger automates: “Traditionally, an escrow is a contract between two parties to facilitate financial transactions… The XRP Ledger takes escrow a step further, replacing the third party with an automated system built into the ledger.” With the TokenEscrow amendment, that same approach now applies to fungible tokens, not just XRP. For Trust Line Tokens, the issuing account must enable the Allow Trust Line Locking flag so the issued token can be escrowed. For MPTs, the issuer must set Can Escrow and Can Transfer flags at issuance so those tokens can both be held in escrow and transferred when released. One notable constraint: issuers cannot create escrows using their own issued tokens, though they can receive escrowed tokens as recipients. Authorization gating also matters. If a token requires authorization, the sender must be pre-authorized by the issuer before creating an escrow, and must be authorized to receive the tokens back if an expired escrow is canceled—regardless of who submits the cancellation. Separately, the recipient must be pre-authorized before an escrow can be finished. XRPL supports time-based, conditional, and combination escrows. The flow is anchored around EscrowCreate to lock funds, EscrowFinish to release them when conditions are met, and EscrowCancel to return funds once an escrow expires. For token escrows specifically, an expiration time is mandatory. The feature is not free. XRPL.org flags that escrow “requires two transactions” and that Crypto-Conditions increase fees. While the ledger supports Crypto-Conditions, it currently only supports PREIMAGE-SHA-256, and fulfillment verification raises EscrowFinish costs. The documentation gives a concrete minimum: an EscrowFinish with a fulfillment requires at least 330 drops of XRP plus an additional amount based on fulfillment size, with the formula scaling if fee settings change. RippleX highlighted use cases spanning vesting and grants, conditional payments and OTC-style swaps, treasury workflows like legal holds and collateral, and tokenized rights and RWA-style unlocks. The common thread is a native, on-ledger “lock until X” mechanism now available to the token layer, useful for structured settlement, compliance-shaped flows, and predictable release conditions without relying on a third-party custodian or purely off-chain coordination. At press time, XRP traded at $1.35.

13 Feb 2026, 08:55

HIVE unit BUZZ lands $30M in AI cloud contracts

HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. said its high-performance computing arm, BUZZ, has signed customer agreements worth about $30 million to boost its AI cloud ambitions. According to a press statement shared with Cryptopolitan on Friday, the Canadian company announced that BUZZ, its Tier-III data center platform, secured two-year fixed-term contracts subject to performance obligations. The contracts are expected to expedite the expansion of HIVE’s Tier-III operations, which support advanced high-performance computing workloads. Buzz signs infrastructure deal to deploy AI-GPUs Per HIVE’s statement , the new deals anchor the first phase of BUZZ’s AI-optimized GPU deployment at its Canada West facility in Manitoba. Compute capacity from this phase is scheduled to come online during the quarter ending March 31, 2026. The initial build-out consists of 504 liquid-cooled GPUs built on Dell servers, all meant for high-performance AI and HPC workloads. Executives stated that, based on executed contracts, current pricing, and deployment schedules, this first phase should generate about $15 million in annual recurring revenue upon full operationalization. HIVE expects total annualized revenue from its HPC segment to increase from about $20 million to $35 million upon full deployment, subject to capital expenditures, operating costs, and customer utilization. The technology company also expects to incur capital expenditures for electrical systems, cooling infrastructure, and working capital needs. Other operating expenses will include power, hosting, maintenance, staffing, and network costs, the firm’s higher-ups said. According to HIVE’s President Aydin Kilic, the company could scale its HPC GPU AI cloud business toward approximately $140 million in annual recurring revenue over the next year. In a prior earnings webcast, the tech firm revealed it aimed to deploy 2,000 AI-optimized GPUs at its Canada West facility this year. “This is just the beginning. Demand for long-term access to high-performance, power-efficient AI compute continues to expand globally, and we are excited to further scale our GPU cloud business throughout 2026,” Kilic told reporters earlier today. Craig Tavares, President and Chief Operating Officer of BUZZ HPC, said Canada needs more sovereign AI compute capacity and domestic infrastructure to serve local workloads and global AI companies from a secure base. BUZZ to execute Tier-III strategy with capital discipline Executive Chairman of HIVE, Frank Holmes, believes the company is doing well in 2026, supported by the strong momentum in its HPC and GPU cloud business. “HIVE has built a track record as one of the longest-standing publicly traded crypto Tier-I data center operators, performing through market cycles while protecting cash flow and balance sheet strength. Now, with BUZZ, we are leveraging that foundation to build a high-growth AI cloud platform spanning Canada, Sweden, and Paraguay,” the executive boasted. Speaking on capital requirements of data centres, Holmes propounded that Tier-I systems for hashrate services need about $1 million per megawatt of infrastructure. In comparison with more advanced systems, he explained that Tier-III facilities have materially higher capital demands because they include premium GPU hardware, power architecture, and advanced cooling systems. Constructing and equipping a comparable fully self-funded Tier-III facility with similar GPU capacity could require around $70 million in capital expenditures. HIVE has already purchased properties and buildings for its Tier-I facilities, but the chief executive said the firm is still assessing selective Tier-III conversions and colocation strategies for HPC. Bitcoin mining to continue with AI on the horizon On February 5, HIVE released operational results for January 2026, which showed a 290% year-over-year increase in hashrate. The average hashrate reached 22.2 exahash per second and peaked at 23.7 EH/s. HIVE produced 297 Bitcoin in January, a 191% increase from the total recorded 12 months earlier. The company’s average daily production reached 9.6 bitcoin per day in January, while maintaining more than 2% of the global Bitcoin network hashrate throughout the month. Moreover, the fleet efficiency averaged 17.5 joules per terahash, while mining rigs produced approximately 13.4 Bitcoin per exahash. HIVE will release financial results for the nine months ended December 31, 2025, on February 17, during an earnings call scheduled for 8:00 AM Eastern Time. Get 8% CASHBACK when you spend crypto with COCA Visa card. Order your FREE card.