hodler

4 Jun 2026, 11:09

CLARITY Act News: Senator Lummis Says Final Senate Vote Could Take Longer

Senator Cynthia Lummis says the Senate may need more time to complete work on the CLARITY Act. Her latest comments point to a possible vote before the August recess, rather than before the July 4 break. Lawmakers still need to combine several proposals before the crypto market structure bill reaches final form. The update adds a longer timeline to one of the most closely watched digital asset bills in Congress. Crypto News: Senator Lummis Points to August Timeline Senator Lummis said a Senate floor vote could still happen before the July 4 congressional recess. However, a vote before the August recess is the more likely outcome. Her comments show that lawmakers continue to work through the final structure of the CLARITY Act before it reaches the full Senate. The bill recently moved onto the Senate Legislative Calendar, which allows Senate leaders to bring it forward for consideration. Even so, no debate date or floor vote has been announced. That leaves the timing open as committees continue to align their versions of the legislation. Lummis said several pieces must still come together before the bill can move ahead. Those include the Senate Banking Committee’s proposal, the Agriculture Committee’s work, ethics provisions, and changes linked to the GENIUS Act. Each part affects how the final market structure framework will treat digital assets, platforms, and related services. The Senate also needs enough support to clear procedural hurdles. Lummis noted that cloture requires 60 votes, which makes final agreement important before leaders move the bill to the floor. While Congress can move quickly when there is broad agreement, she said the July recess may arrive too soon for the full process. Lawmakers Work on Final Crypto Market Rules The CLARITY Act aims to set clearer rules for digital asset markets in the United States. A central part of the bill focuses on the roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. For years, crypto firms have faced uncertainty over which agency oversees different tokens and trading platforms. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has backed the bill and urged Congress to pass crypto market structure rules this summer. He described legal clarity as important for digital asset markets in the United States. His support adds weight to the push from lawmakers who want a federal framework instead of case-by-case enforcement. Bessent has also linked the broader crypto policy debate to the administration’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The reserve will grow at a “deliberate speed,” signaling a slower approach to sovereign Bitcoin accumulation. At the same time, his support for the CLARITY Act shows that legislation remains a near-term policy priority. The bill still faces disputes over stablecoin rewards, developer protections, and compliance standards. Critics have raised concerns over whether the proposal treats crypto companies differently from banks. Supporters argue that the bill keeps anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act requirements within the digital asset framework. Banking Debate Adds Pressure to Senate Talks The CLARITY Act has also drawn scrutiny from major banking figures. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon recently criticized the proposal during a CNBC interview. He argued that the bill could let crypto firms offer rewards tied to deposits or stablecoins without bank-level protections. Lummis rejected that reading and said existing anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act rules already apply to digital assets. She also said the legislation includes those obligations. Her response placed the dispute within the wider debate over how banks and crypto firms should compete under federal law. The banking debate adds another layer to Senate negotiations. Lawmakers must balance market structure rules, consumer protections, enforcement authority, and innovation policy. They also face pressure from crypto firms, banks, developers, and national security voices seeking changes to the final text.

4 Jun 2026, 10:31

USAT’s Growth Test: Can Tether Win Regulated Dollar Liquidity in the U.S.?

On a brisk May morning, a handful of U.S. market makers quietly lit up new USAT pairs, testing whether Tether’s U.S.-facing dollar token could clear compliance teams as easily as it clears blocks. Spreads tightened, then widened—an early tell that liquidity was still thin. Hours later, Washington sent a stronger signal. The Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act by a 15–9 vote, a procedural step that could redefine the perimeter for U.S. stablecoins and the banks and fintechs that move them ( ABA Banking Journal ). Between new policy momentum and fresh on-chain tickers, Tether has a narrow but real opening. The question is whether USAT can translate offshore dominance into domestic, regulated dollar liquidity. The Big Picture Stablecoins are the de facto settlement rail of crypto, and they increasingly touch real-world payments and treasury operations. By mid-May 2026, the market sat in the low-$300 billions, with USDT in the lead and USDC second, a duopoly that sets the tone for liquidity everywhere from centralized exchanges to on-chain money markets ( DeFiLlama ). In a market where two tokens account for more than four-fifths of supply, any new entrant must solve distribution, compliance, and conversion at scale—not just launch a contract. USAT, positioned as a U.S.-compliant sibling to USDT, is Tether’s answer to that distribution and compliance riddle. Early issuance is small, but growth is brisk, and the policy window is opening . What Exactly Is USAT—and Why Tether Built It USDT’s offshore gravity vs. a domestic mandate USDT has long anchored crypto’s liquidity stack, and as of May 10, 2026, stood around $189.63 billion—about 58.8% of global stablecoin supply, with USDC at roughly $78.96 billion (24.5%). Together they comprised ~83.3% of the market, per aggregated data ( Analysis Atlas ). But U.S. banks, brokers, and public companies need domestically compliant rails and clear rules for custody, reporting, and redemptions. USAT appears designed to fit that bill, aiming for U.S.-oriented distribution while leaving USDT’s global footprint intact. Its thesis: meet institutional risk committees where they are—onshore, controlled, and auditable. What USAT is—and isn’t—right now By mid-May 2026, USAT’s circulating supply hovered near 37.75 million, with a 30-day growth rate of about 88.74%, according to tracker Pharos ( Pharos ). That’s meaningful acceleration from a small base, not yet a liquidity standard. The specifics of licensing, reserve composition disclosures, and compliance workflows will ultimately determine how many regulated counterparties will hold USAT on balance sheet. The Policy Window: CLARITY Act and the Shape of Rules Why the Senate committee vote matters The U.S. Senate Banking Committee’s 15–9 vote to advance the CLARITY Act on May 14, 2026, is not final law—but it is a credible signal that stablecoin oversight is rising to the top tier of market-structure priorities ( ABA Banking Journal ). What regulated liquidity could look like While final provisions remain to be seen, regulated stablecoin liquidity in the U.S. typically entails: Clear issuer obligations on reserves, audits/attestations, and disclosures. Defined supervision—state, federal, or a hybrid—for issuance and redemption flows. Blacklisting/sanctions tooling to satisfy compliance programs and law enforcement requests. Bank-grade segregation of assets and bankruptcy remoteness for end users. Standardized reporting so public companies can hold and report balances with confidence. If the CLARITY Act (or successor policy) codifies these pillars, it could lower the political and operational friction for U.S. treasurers to adopt on-chain dollars. That’s the prize USAT is targeting. Early Traction by the Numbers Where USAT stands against incumbents Market share frames the scale of the challenge. Multiple snapshots in mid-May place the total stablecoin market in the low-$300 billions (e.g., ~$318.35B on DeFiLlama, with USDT dominance ~58.8%; DeFiLlama ). Aggregated figures on May 10 show total supply at ~$322.74B, with USDT at $189.63B and USDC at $78.96B ( Analysis Atlas ). TokenIssuer/OrientationMarket cap (date)Approx. shareNotesUSDTTether; global/offshore~$189.63B (May 10, 2026)~58.8%Primary liquidity rail across CEX/DeFiUSDCCircle; U.S.-oriented~$78.96B (May 10, 2026)~24.5%Entrenched with U.S. fintechs and payment firmsUSATTether; U.S.-facing~$37.76M (May 15, 2026)—30-day growth ~+88.74% from small base ( Pharos ) USAT’s footprint is tiny compared to incumbents, but the slope matters. If issuance continues to grow and regulated on/off-ramps list the asset, market makers can begin consolidating depth. Until then, slippage and basis risk will keep many institutions on the sidelines. The Go-To-Market Gauntlet in the U.S. Distribution beats design—every time Winning regulated dollar liquidity is a sales and integrations exercise long before it’s a tokenomics one. The most credible path for USAT looks like this: Secure listings with top U.S.-accessible exchanges and brokers that have robust compliance programs. Integrate with enterprise on/off-ramps and custodians to enable fiat settlement, W-9/KYC, and reporting. Build bank partnerships for redemptions, sweeps, and cash management products that interact with USAT balances. Onboard payment processors and fintechs so merchants and apps can settle in USAT without bespoke builds. Support major L1s/L2s and programmable controls (allow/block lists, travel rule support) for institutional DeFi tooling. Who has to say yes It’s not enough for crypto exchanges to list USAT. Corporate treasurers need custodians and auditors aligned; brokers need clearing firms aligned; and funds need LP agreements that explicitly allow exposure. Each “yes” compounds distribution—and each “no” traps liquidity on islands. Architecture Choices That Could Make or Break Adoption Chains, compliance, and programmability Technical decisions ripple into risk committees. Key design levers include: Multi-chain deployment with native mints vs. bridges, to reduce custody and bridge risk. Standardized sanctions tooling and emergency controls, communicated clearly in documentation. Transparent reserve reporting cadence and auditor credibility. API-first issuance/redemption for enterprise platforms and treasury systems. Interoperability with payment messaging and accounting systems for automated reconciliation. Price stability mechanics and secondary markets Even with perfect reserves, on-exchange spreads can deviate if market makers lack access to instant creation/redemption or bank rails. Early on, USAT will likely see episodic premiums/discounts until liquidity providers, redemptions, and arbitrage loops mature. Scenarios for 2026–2027 Base case: Gradual institutional testing Assuming the policy process stays on track and large custodians add support, USAT could become a niche settlement option for U.S.-connected exchanges and selected fintechs by late 2026. Growth would be steady but still far from USDT/USDC scale. Upside case: Rule clarity plus flagship integrations If the CLARITY Act (or equivalent) locks in reserve and supervision standards, and USAT secures two or three flagship enterprise integrations (custody, payments, and a major broker), liquidity could inflect. The prize: a credible “regulated Tether” lane that complements, rather than cannibalizes, USDT’s offshore base. Downside case: Policy limbo and fragmented rails Delays in legislation, uneven state-federal guidance, or adverse enforcement could keep U.S. institutions anchored to USDC or bank deposits, leaving USAT as a thinly traded asset with sporadic liquidity. In that world, the offshore/onshore divide persists—and distribution never compounds. Risks & What Could Go Wrong Regulatory uncertainty: Legislative timelines can slip; final rules may impose costly or restrictive requirements. Bank partner dependency: Without strong banking relationships, creation/redemption friction can widen spreads. Liquidity fragmentation: Thin depth across chains/exchanges can trap capital and increase basis risk. Operational clarity: Insufficient disclosures on reserves, attestations, or emergency controls can deter institutions. Reputational overhangs: Market narratives—fair or not—can influence compliance teams and auditors. Competition response: Incumbents may cut fees, expand features, or launch U.S.-specific products to crowd out USAT. Stablecoins don’t fail on code; they fail on trust, banking access, and the speed of redemption when markets stress. For market context, multiple trackers show just how much ground any U.S.-oriented entrant must cover. DeFiLlama’s dashboard placed total stablecoin value around ~$318B in mid-May with USDT dominance near 58.8% ( DeFiLlama ), while an aggregated reading five days earlier tallied ~$322.74B overall supply ( Analysis Atlas ). Against that backdrop, USAT’s ~37.75M float and rapid 30-day expansion, as recorded by Pharos, highlights a fast start from a small base ( Pharos ). Ongoing coverage and data-driven explainers on stablecoin policy, liquidity, and adoption can be found at Crypto Daily, which tracks market microstructure and regulatory shifts across assets and geographies ( Crypto Daily ). Frequently Asked Questions What is USAT and how is it different from USDT? USAT is positioned as a U.S.-facing dollar token from Tether, intended to operate within domestic compliance expectations. USDT remains the global, offshore-oriented stablecoin that leads crypto liquidity. The core distinction is target jurisdiction and regulatory posture, not the brand. How big is USAT right now? As of May 15, 2026, Pharos estimated USAT’s circulating supply near 37.75 million tokens with a 30-day growth rate around +88.74%, indicating rapid early uptake from a small base ( Pharos ). Why does the CLARITY Act matter for USAT? The Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act on May 14, 2026, signaling momentum toward clearer U.S. rules. Such clarity could reduce institutional friction for holding and settling with on-chain dollars, directly affecting USAT’s addressable market ( ABA Banking Journal ). How does USAT compare with USDT and USDC in market share? The stablecoin market sat in the low-$300 billions in mid-May 2026. USDT was roughly 58.8% of supply and USDC about 24.5%; together around 83.3%. USAT is far smaller by comparison but growing quickly from its early base ( Analysis Atlas ; DeFiLlama ). What will determine whether USAT wins regulated liquidity? Distribution and compliance: listings on U.S.-accessible venues, integrations with top custodians and payment processors, robust banking relationships for redemptions, and transparent reserve reporting. Policy stability will also be critical. Is USAT meant to replace USDT? Not necessarily. A plausible strategy is segmentation: USDT continues to serve global crypto markets, while USAT targets institutions that prefer or require U.S.-aligned compliance and reporting standards. What risks should institutions consider? Policy uncertainty, bank partner dependencies, liquidity fragmentation, and disclosure sufficiency. As with any stablecoin, evaluate reserve transparency, redemption mechanics, and legal structure before allocating. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

4 Jun 2026, 10:00

UK House Of Lords Urges BoE To Ease Stablecoin Rules Over Competitiveness Concerns

The House of Lords, the upper chamber of the UK parliament, has urged financial regulators to reconsider some of their controversial stablecoin proposals, warning that the country risks falling behind global leaders if regulation is not done right. House Of Lords Outlines Concerns Over Stablecoin Rules On Wednesday, the House of Lords’ Financial Services Regulation Committee published a report on the regulation of stablecoins, urging the Bank of England (BoE) to review some areas of its proposed rules “where the desired balance between supporting innovation and risk mitigation appears less appropriately calibrated.” The committee affirmed its support for many of the central bank’s proposals, including the requirement that issuers back stablecoins 1:1 and the backstop lending facility. However, it noted that aspects of the proposals “need further consideration.” Last year, the central bank proposed that systemic stablecoin issuers hold at least 40% of the reserves backing the token as unremunerated bank deposits to ensure “robust redemption” and “public confidence.” It also suggested a temporary cap on stablecoin ownership, setting holding limits of £10,000 to £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses. The measure resembled the BoE’s proposed approach to the digital pound, aiming to mitigate financial stability risks “stemming from large and rapid outflows of deposits from the banking sector.” The policymakers consider that regulators should reevaluate the asset allocation and redemption requirements, citing the “considerable operational burdens this would create” and potential negative impact on the sustainability of stablecoin issuers and the UK’s global market competitiveness. In addition, the report suggested that the holding limits should be reconsidered, arguing that they could unnecessarily hinder the expansion of pound-based stablecoins and prove impractical to implement. It also shared concerns about the lack of clarity on the transition from the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) regime to joint regulation alongside the BoE, and the uncertainty surrounding HM Treasury’s plans to determine whether stablecoins are systemic and to bring them into the payments regulatory perimeter. UK At Risk Of Falling Behind The Committee affirmed that the shape of the pound-denominated stablecoin market will be “strongly influenced by the direction of the regulatory regime,” and authorities must “create a level playing field so that stablecoins can compete with other forms of payment in the UK.” Therefore, the regime must be flexible, responsive, and clear to accommodate future innovations, or the UK will risk “lagging behind global counterparts, where regulatory regimes are more established and provide clarity for market participants.” The House of Lords’ report follows pressure from industry participants and other lawmakers to fight the controversial proposals. In December, members of the House of Lords, the House of Commons, and peers sent a letter to Chancellor Rachel Reeves asking her to oppose the BoE’s stablecoin rules, arguing that they could undermine the government’s efforts to position the UK as an industry leader. Last month, BoE’s Deputy Governor for financial stability, Sarah Breeden, stated that the central bank was preparing to ease its regulatory plans. As reported by Bitcoinist, Breeden admitted that the proposals may have been “overly conservative.” She also shared that the financial regulator was “genuinely open” to revisiting the rules and establishing a better regime in which stablecoins can thrive. Ultimately, the committee urged regulators to adhere to current timelines and ensure that the final regulatory regime is not delayed. A BoE spokesperson told Reuters that the central bank will publish its final policy and draft rules later this month.

4 Jun 2026, 09:50

BTC Tests Critical 200-Week SMA Support: More Downside Ahead or Reversal Loading? (June 2026)

Heavily oversold now in the shorter time frames, has the $BTC price just made a bottom with a quick dip down to $61K, or is the extremely poor market sentiment going to push the price down to the previous bottom at $60K? Bull market trendline is retested Source: TradingView Since plummeting down through the bottom trendline of the large bear flag, the $BTC price has fallen 15.8%, or $11,500 in US dollar terms. After a candle tail quickly came down to tag $61,300, the price rose back up again and has settled at just under $64,000. That tail also tagged a major line in the form of the bull market trendline. With this last major trendline coming into play, the $BTC price really must be coming to a bottom. If the price is able to bounce from here , and that is debatable considering the awful market sentiment , $66K will be the major barrier to cross now that it has become resistance. The small trendline that has developed since the price fell out of the bear flag would be the key to any short-term trend change back to the upside. To the downside, a revisit of the bull market trendline could be a next move. If this didn’t hold, a drop to the $60K support, a possible lower low, and a confirmation of the bull market trendline as resistance could all strike terror into the hearts of the bulls. A relief bounce the more probable outcome? Source: TradingView In normal circumstances, with an asset as mainstream as Bitcoin, the daily chart above would probably suggest a strong buy, even if this was only for a relief rally. The long tail underneath the current candle, the dip down to test the bull market trendline, the potential for a double bottom, the RSI indicator at a very oversold level - all would appear to be signalling a reversal back to the upside. Nevertheless, with such a filthy market sentiment, even such an obvious setup must be approached with caution. But yes, a bounce is the more probable outcome from here. Be that as it may, this bounce might only succeed in getting back to test and confirm $66,000 as resistance, while getting all the way back to test the underside of the bear flag is doable, but a real outside bet. The final leg of the bear market Source: TradingView The weekly chart puts a great perfect perspective onto the overall picture. Firstly, it can be seen that the bull market and bear market trendlines are converging. While the $BTC price has come down to retest the bull market trendline, and incidentally the 200-week SMA, it is also quite near to what would be a very important retest of the bear market trendline. If the bear market trendline did get a retest, that would be a very convincing sign that the bottom was either in, or very near. If a retest took place this week, it would be at a price of around $57,000. At the bottom of the chart, the Stochastic RSI indicators are heading down fast. Another 4 or 5 weeks could see them at their lower limit again. The MACD is also posturing to the downside . A double dip of the indicator lines is what could be next. Many investors will be fearful of the current price action for $BTC , and things could get even worse. However, this is possibly the final down leg of this bear market, and it only remains to be seen where the bottom will eventually be . It may not be as low as many think. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

4 Jun 2026, 09:32

Scott Bessent Pushes CLARITY Act This Summer: Bitcoin Reserve Will Grow at “Deliberate Speed”

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is pushing hard for the Crypto CLARITY Act to clear Congress by summer 2026, and simultaneously urging patience on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. That combination of urgency on legislation and caution on sovereign BTC accumulation tells you exactly where the administration’s priorities sit right now. Bessent has described the Bitcoin Reserve as moving at “deliberate speed,” a phrase that signals intent without committing to a timeline. Bitcoin (BTC) 24h 7d 30d 1y All time The tension is real: the same administration that wants to position America as a crypto superpower is also the one pumping the brakes on its most headline-grabbing crypto policy. Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio CLARITY Act by Summer 2026: What Bessent’s Backing Actually Means for SEC vs. CFTC The core problem the CLARITY Act solves is jurisdictional. For years, the SEC and CFTC have operated overlapping and often contradictory mandates over digital assets, leaving exchanges, developers, and institutional desks in a permanent state of legal ambiguity. Bessent and the Department of the Treasury want that resolved, and they want it done through legislation rather than continued regulation by enforcement. Bessent has framed the bill as “essential to the future viability of bitcoin and digital asset markets in the U.S.” and has publicly argued that even just progress toward passage would “greatly reassure the market” during periods of volatility. 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗜𝗡: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says he is looking forward to the Clarity Act being passed this summer. pic.twitter.com/HW3zcGMRqm — DustyBC Crypto (@DustyBC) June 3, 2026 The legislative path isn’t clean. Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill in January 2026, citing disputes over the treatment of stablecoin rewards, and that pullback contributed to committee delays that are still playing out. Closed-door negotiations are ongoing in both chambers, and the stablecoin impasse remains the central sticking point heading into markup deadlines. If the bill does pass, the structural impact on Crypto Regulation is significant. A clear SEC vs. CFTC boundary eliminates the ambiguity that has kept institutional players on the sidelines and inflated compliance costs across the industry. Polymarket Prediction market Polymarket is currently pricing in roughly a 59% probability that the CLARITY Act gets enacted by end of 2026, meaningful odds, but hardly a lock. That’s a long-term bullish structural shift, not a near-term price catalyst, but the kind of framework change that underpins a sustained institutional accumulation cycle. The Bitcoin Strategic Reserve: ‘Deliberate Speed’ Is Doing a Lot of Heavy Lifting The Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, established under Executive Order 14233 signed in March 2025, currently holds an estimated $15–20 billion in BTC and other digital assets seized by U.S. law enforcement. The order bars the government from selling any bitcoin once it enters the reserve, ending the longstanding practice of U.S. Marshals Service auctions of forfeited BTC. Bessent confirmed on Fox Business that the U.S. will not purchase bitcoin on the open market. The reserve grows only through future confiscations, and the Treasury is exploring what Bessent called “budget-neutral pathways” to acquire more, think asset swaps or reallocation of existing digital-asset portfolios rather than net new taxpayer outlays. JUST IN: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says he's looking forward to working with lawmakers on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve "We are proceeding with all deliberate speed. And we are making sure…we use best practices and things will be durable for the future" pic.twitter.com/wMuttlfTlc — Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 3, 2026 For traders expecting a sovereign buy-wall, that’s a cold shower. Given how quickly leveraged markets can destabilize around large BTC flows , Bessent’s caution on open-market purchases is probably the right call for systemic stability. White House digital-asset adviser Patrick Witt has flagged a “significant announcement” on next steps for the reserve, including governance and custody frameworks, due “in the coming weeks.” That announcement will tell us whether “deliberate speed” means methodical or stalled. The strategic framing matters too. At Davos, Bessent tied the reserve explicitly to Trump’s goal of making the U.S. a frontrunner in crypto innovation, calling it a strategic resource closely watched by foreign governments. Washington is no longer treating bitcoin as contraband. That shift in posture, regardless of the reserve’s current size, carries weight and is likely to shape Bitcoin’s long-term price trajectory as sovereign interest deepens globally. Two policies, two speeds. The CLARITY Act gets the urgency; the Bitcoin Reserve gets the caution. Bessent’s framing is disciplined, but the market will eventually demand more than deliberate. Discover: The Best Token Presales The post Scott Bessent Pushes CLARITY Act This Summer: Bitcoin Reserve Will Grow at “Deliberate Speed” appeared first on Cryptonews .

4 Jun 2026, 09:28

Kraken Flexline is now available to ECP-qualified US users

TL;DR Kraken Flexline , a fixed-rate, crypto-secured loan , is now available to ECP-qualified 1 Kraken Pro users across 40 US states and Washington, DC. The APR is fixed for the full term and visible before you confirm, so the cost of borrowing can be modeled with real numbers before you commit. 48 crypto assets and 6 fiat currencies are accepted as collateral, with loan terms from 2 days to 2 years and a 75,000 USDC equivalent minimum (100,000 USDC equivalent in Delaware and Minnesota). Collateral stays on Kraken throughout the term; capital can withdraw off-platform to a linked bank account or stay on-platform to trade, stake, or manage positions. A third path, beyond sell or hold Flexline is a fixed-rate loan secured by crypto you already hold on Kraken, available to ECP-qualified users in 40 US states and Washington, DC. 2 The core value proposition is simple. Keep your position. Access the capital you need. Your crypto stays on Kraken. How Flexline actually works The structure is built so the decision can be evaluated with real numbers, not estimates. You select the assets you want to use as collateral, see the fixed APR and the liquidation threshold 3 before you confirm, and either keep the proceeds on Kraken or withdraw them to a linked bank account. When you settle the loan, the collateral returns in full. A few specifics worth knowing up front: Fixed APRs range from 7% to 25% for the full term, with BTC and ETH short-term borrows available under 10% Loan terms run from 2 days to 2 years 48 crypto assets and 6 fiat currencies are accepted as collateral Minimum loan size is $75,000 USDC equivalent ($100,000 USDC equivalent in Delaware and Minnesota) A 0.50% origination fee applies at loan open A loan monitoring dashboard surfaces collateral value and liquidation threshold throughout the term When borrowing fits the situation better than selling When might Flexline be a good fit for you? When you need: Working capital against a long-held position A founder holds a meaningful ETH position built up over several years. A short-term capital need arises, such as a bridge before a funding round closes or a real estate transaction with a defined timeline. The default instinct is to sell. With Flexline, the position stays intact on Kraken, the founder draws against it at a known fixed rate, and the capital withdraws to a bank account. When the loan settles, the collateral returns. Balance sheet deployment without unwinding a treasury position An entity treasury holds BTC as part of its reserve thesis. A separate opportunity appears, perhaps a private investment, an external capital commitment, or a DeFi position elsewhere, and capital is needed to act on it. Selling the BTC means restructuring the treasury and exiting a position the entity has been intentional about. Flexline offers a structured alternative: borrow against the BTC at a fixed APR, deploy the proceeds off-platform, and settle the loan when the time comes. On-platform flexibility while keeping a long-term position intact A Kraken Pro user holds a long-standing BTC position they intend to keep in place. They want capital available to stake, hold in stablecoins, or manage other positions on Kraken without closing the BTC position to do it. Flexline lets the BTC position stay where it is while capital becomes available at a known fixed cost. Getting started The decision to sell a position you’ve built conviction in shouldn’t be forced by a capital need or a passing opportunity. Flexline gives serious holders a structured third option, with the cost known upfront, the collateral kept on Kraken, and the capital free to go where it needs to go. See what your holdings can do without leaving your portfolio. Check your Flexline borrowing power 1 Eligible Contract Participant (ECP) is a classification defined under the US Commodity Exchange Act. It generally includes corporations, partnerships, and similar entities with more than $10 million in total assets; regulated financial institutions and broker-dealers; certain governmental entities; and individuals with more than $10 million invested on a discretionary basis (or $5 million when entering into a transaction to manage risk). ECP qualification is required to access Kraken Flexline in the US. Full eligibility criteria are available at kraken.com/legal . 2 Flexline is currently unavailable in CA, CT, MA, MS, MT, ND, NV, NY, PR, SD, and VT. 3 If collateral value falls below the threshold it may be liquidated. Using Kraken Flexline involves risk, may have tax implications, and may result in the loss of capital. Borrowed assets subject to withdrawal limits. Availability of Kraken Flexline is subject to certain limitations and eligibility criteria. This content is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to use Kraken Flexline. See Kraken Flexline terms at kraken.com/legal . The post Kraken Flexline is now available to ECP-qualified US users appeared first on Kraken Blog .