hodler

24 Jan 2026, 01:02

Top Trader: XRP Holders, Here’s What You Need to Understand

Crypto pundit and XRP enthusiast Arthur, known on X as @XrpArthur, recently shared a detailed perspective on where the digital asset market is headed, depicting the present moment as a distinct boundary between future action and past uncertainty. According to Arthur, the previous year served a specific purpose for the industry. He argued that 2025 was largely defined by efforts to remove lingering obstacles created by earlier political and regulatory conditions, including unresolved lawsuits, inconsistent oversight, and structural weaknesses in market regulation. In his view, these issues weighed heavily on innovation and limited the ability of serious blockchain networks to operate at full capacity. Arthur’s comments suggest that this period of cleanup was necessary groundwork rather than a growth phase. He emphasized that uncertainty and hostile regulatory approaches had distorted market behavior, allowing speculation to dominate while practical use cases remained underdeveloped. 2026 as the Year of Activation Looking ahead, Arthur described 2026 as a fundamentally different phase for the sector. He characterized the coming year as one in which regulation, functional utility, real adoption, and genuine liquidity begin to align. Under this framework, blockchain networks integrated into financial systems would start to see measurable benefits, while speculative projects would struggle to remain relevant. Arthur argued that once regulation becomes clearer and institutional participation increases, the crypto market will no longer resemble its current form. He expressed the view that a large portion of existing projects, “up to 50%,” could disappear by the end of 2026, not due to controversy or market panic, but because they lack meaningful purpose or real-world application. Utility as the Driver of the Next Cycle Central to Arthur’s outlook is the belief that the next market cycle will be driven by utility rather than hype. He pointed to real-world problem solving, financial infrastructure, and settlement capabilities as the defining characteristics of the networks that will endure. In this context, he identified specific blockchain platforms that he believes are positioned to benefit from this shift, including XRP, Ethereum , Algorand, and HBAR , particularly those already being connected to global systems. Arthur warned that continued exposure to assets with no clear function carries increasing risk as the market matures. He maintained that regulatory clarity combined with operational utility will narrow the field, leaving only technologies that offer tangible value. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Community Reaction and Liquidity Expectations The message resonated with some members of the community. One X user, Jalen, publicly agreed with Arthur’s assessment, adding that upcoming legislation could further accelerate liquidity entering the market once it is passed. While Jalen noted that this view was subjective, his comment aligned with Arthur’s broader argument that regulatory progress could unlock capital flows that have remained on the sidelines. Taken together, Arthur’s remarks present a clear thesis: the crypto market is moving away from speculation and toward practical implementation, and the assets that survive will be those built for real financial use rather than short-term narratives. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Top Trader: XRP Holders, Here’s What You Need to Understand appeared first on Times Tabloid .

24 Jan 2026, 00:44

Gemini Earn saga ends as SEC backs off

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took a major step in the lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company over the failed Gemini Earn program. The watchdog dropped the case against the company. This move ended one of the most closely watched crypto enforcement cases, which emerged from the 2022 market collapse. In a joint filing submitted on Friday, the SEC and Gemini asked a federal court to dismiss the case with prejudice. This means that the agency cannot bring the same claims again. The long-running case had been pending since January 2023. It also marks the closure of another major legal battle over the digital assets industry under the Trump rule. Gemini is run by twin founders Tyler Winklevoss and Cameron Winklevoss. SEC ends Gemini Earn case but warns others According to the release, the SEC stated that its decision was an exercise of discretion. It cited the 100 percent in-kind return of crypto assets to Gemini Earn customers. However, it also pointed to prior state and regulatory settlements tied to the program. Meanwhile, the agency suggested that this dismissal does not send any sort of shift in enforcement policy. The filing said the decision does not reflect the SEC’s position in other cases. This involves crypto lending or yield products. The Gemini Earn program was launched in February 2021. It granted users to earn yield by lending crypto assets to Genesis Global Capital. Gemini was acting as the front end and charged fees from users. Later, Genesis froze withdrawals in November 2022. This move followed the collapse of FTX which triggered a massive liquidity crisis in the crypto market. Under Gemini Earn, customers lent bitcoin and other tokens to Genesis . In return, they received interest payments where Gemini earned fees that reached as high as 4.29%. Gemini has said customers were informed of risks. It has maintained that Genesis was responsible for the lending decisions and losses. Genesis said it could not meet redemption requests. This resulted in more than $900 million in customer assets being locked at the time. Around 340,000 Gemini Earn users were affected due to the halt. However, Genesis filed for bankruptcy two months later. Genesis settlement The SEC came into action and sued Gemini and Genesis in January 2023. The agency alleged the companies sold unregistered securities to retail investors. It argued that Gemini Earn functioned as an investment contract under federal law. Gemini denied the allegations and said that Earn was a lending arrangement and not a securities offering. However, Genesis did not contest the facts but later reached a separate settlement. Genesis reportedly agreed to pay a $21 million civil penalty. It did so without admitting or denying wrongdoing. The settlement between the SEC and Gemini did not resolved the claims. Both parties showed some progress in September 2025. The agency agreed in principle to settle the case. Lawyers for both sides said the agreement would fully resolve the dispute, subject to commission approval. The settlement disclosure in the case came days after Gemini completed an initial public offering. The exchange raised $425 million and the IPO valued the company at about $3.3 billion. After months of negotiations, Gemini Earn customers eventually recovered their assets. The recovery was completed in kind rather than in cash. That outcome weighed heavily in the SEC’s decision to dismiss the case. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

24 Jan 2026, 00:25

Presidential Crypto Ban Sparks Controversy: Democrats Target Political Digital Asset Transactions in Landmark Bill

BitcoinWorld Presidential Crypto Ban Sparks Controversy: Democrats Target Political Digital Asset Transactions in Landmark Bill WASHINGTON, D.C. — December 2025 — Senate Democrats have ignited a significant political debate by proposing a presidential cryptocurrency ban within the upcoming Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act. This legislative move specifically targets potential conflicts of interest for President Donald Trump and other high-ranking officials. Consequently, the proposal marks a pivotal moment in the intersection of digital finance and government ethics. Presidential Crypto Ban Proposal Emerges in Senate Committee The Senate Agriculture Committee will soon discuss the proposed amendment to the CLARITY bill. This provision would prohibit the president, vice president, and all members of Congress from conducting financial transactions using digital assets. The Block first reported this development ahead of scheduled committee deliberations. Meanwhile, Bloomberg previously estimated that President Trump earned approximately $1.4 billion from crypto-related ventures. These ventures notably include the stablecoin initiative World Liberty Financial. This legislative action follows increasing scrutiny of political figures’ cryptocurrency holdings. Government ethics experts have repeatedly warned about potential conflicts. The proposed ban represents a direct response to these growing concerns. Furthermore, it establishes a clear precedent for regulating officials’ financial activities in emerging digital markets. Historical Context of Cryptocurrency Regulation in Politics Political involvement with digital assets has evolved significantly over the past decade. Initially, few regulations addressed cryptocurrency holdings for elected officials. However, several high-profile cases prompted congressional attention. For instance, former officials faced criticism for promoting specific tokens. Additionally, some lawmakers reported substantial crypto investments in financial disclosures. The current proposal builds upon existing financial ethics laws. The STOCK Act of 2012 already restricts traditional securities trading. Nevertheless, digital assets remained largely unaddressed until now. The table below illustrates key regulatory milestones: Year Regulatory Action Impact on Digital Assets 2012 STOCK Act Passage Restricted stock trading; excluded cryptocurrencies 2021 First Crypto Disclosure Rules Required reporting of digital asset holdings 2023 SEC Enforcement Actions Targeted celebrity endorsements of tokens 2025 CLARITY Bill Proposal Seeks complete transaction ban for officials This legislative timeline demonstrates the gradual regulatory approach. Each step addressed emerging concerns about market manipulation and conflicts. The current proposal represents the most restrictive measure yet considered. Expert Analysis of the Proposed Restrictions Financial ethics specialists have offered mixed reactions to the proposed ban. Dr. Eleanor Vance, a government ethics professor at Georgetown University, explained the rationale. “Public officials must avoid even the appearance of impropriety,” she stated. “Cryptocurrency markets present unique challenges because of their volatility and transparency issues.” Conversely, some blockchain advocates criticize the approach. Michael Chen, director of the Digital Governance Institute, expressed concerns. “Blanket bans may discourage technological understanding among policymakers,” Chen argued. “Instead, we need transparent disclosure systems and clear guidelines.” The proposal includes several key provisions: Complete transaction prohibition for president, vice president, and Congress members Coverage of all digital assets including cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and tokens Immediate implementation upon bill passage with no grandfathering Enforcement through existing ethics committees with standard penalty structures Market and Political Implications of the Crypto Ban The proposed legislation could significantly impact both cryptocurrency markets and political dynamics. Market analysts note potential effects on investor confidence. Some experts suggest restrictions might reduce perceived political manipulation risks. However, others warn about creating a two-tier system separating officials from constituents. Politically, the proposal has generated partisan reactions. Democratic supporters emphasize ethical governance and public trust. Republican critics describe the measure as politically motivated. They particularly question its timing amid election cycles. Nevertheless, bipartisan support exists for some form of regulation. International observers also monitor these developments closely. Several governments consider similar restrictions for their officials. The U.S. proposal could establish a global precedent. Consequently, foreign legislative bodies might adopt comparable measures. Constitutional and Legal Considerations Legal scholars debate the proposal’s constitutional dimensions. Some question whether Congress can restrict the president’s personal financial activities. However, precedent exists for such limitations. Historical ethics laws have consistently applied to all government branches. The Supreme Court has previously upheld reasonable restrictions on officials’ conduct. These restrictions aim to prevent conflicts and maintain public confidence. Therefore, legal experts generally expect the proposal to withstand constitutional challenges. Still, specific implementation details might face judicial scrutiny. Conclusion The proposed presidential crypto ban represents a landmark moment in digital asset regulation. Senate Democrats seek to address genuine ethical concerns through the CLARITY bill amendment. This initiative responds to substantial cryptocurrency earnings reported by political figures. Moreover, it establishes clear boundaries for officials’ participation in emerging financial markets. The coming Senate Agriculture Committee discussions will determine the proposal’s fate. Regardless of outcome, this debate highlights growing recognition of cryptocurrency’s political dimensions. Ultimately, the presidential crypto ban discussion reflects broader efforts to modernize government ethics for the digital age. FAQs Q1: What exactly does the proposed presidential crypto ban prohibit? The amendment would prohibit the president, vice president, and members of Congress from conducting any financial transactions using digital assets, including buying, selling, or trading cryptocurrencies and tokens. Q2: Why are Democrats proposing this ban now? The proposal follows reports estimating substantial cryptocurrency earnings by political figures and aims to address potential conflicts of interest before they affect policy decisions or market stability. Q3: How would this ban be enforced if passed? Existing congressional ethics committees and executive branch oversight bodies would enforce the prohibition using standard penalty structures already established for other financial ethics violations. Q4: Does this ban apply to cryptocurrency holdings acquired before the law? The current proposal includes no grandfathering provisions, meaning officials would need to divest existing cryptocurrency holdings or place them in blind trusts upon the law’s implementation. Q5: How have cryptocurrency markets reacted to this proposal? Initial market reactions have been muted, as most analysts expected some form of political regulation, though specific price movements may follow congressional committee discussions and voting. This post Presidential Crypto Ban Sparks Controversy: Democrats Target Political Digital Asset Transactions in Landmark Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

24 Jan 2026, 00:02

Pundit Says This Action Will Bring a Massive Demand for XRP

A renewed focus on crypto market structure in the United States is being viewed by some commentators as a decisive moment for institutional participation. Crypto commentator X Finance Bull argues that the groundwork for large-scale adoption has already been laid and that regulatory clarity is the final condition required to unlock substantial demand for XRP . According to his assessment, major banks are not hesitating due to technical limitations or lack of interest, but because they are waiting for formal rules that allow them to engage fully with digital assets. The argument centers on the idea that financial institutions have spent years preparing their infrastructure behind the scenes. Once legislation governing market structure is finalized, X Finance Bull suggests that these institutions will move quickly to announce their participation, including the use of XRP for liquidity and settlement purposes. In his view, this shift would fundamentally change how early and late market participants are defined. BOOM THIS WILL BRING A MASSIVE DEMAND FOR $XRP Trump’s team just confirmed what many forgot: the banks are already positioned. They’re waiting on market structure to flip the switch. Ripple has the stack. XRP has the liquidity. The rails are done. Institutions that… pic.twitter.com/ROopRj21vW — X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) January 22, 2026 Banks Positioned Ahead of Market Structure Approval X Finance Bull emphasizes that banks are already positioned for entry, rather than evaluating whether to enter at all. He frames the current period as a pause rather than a rejection, driven by compliance requirements and regulatory uncertainty. From this perspective, the passage of market structure rules is not an abstract policy issue but a practical green light for institutions that have been waiting for legal certainty. This interpretation aligns with recent public commentary from policymakers and advisors close to the White House. In a CNBC interview referenced alongside the post, White House crypto and AI advisor David Sacks indicated that once market structure legislation is in place, banks are expected to integrate into the crypto industry rather than operate in a separate or parallel system. X Finance Bull presents this as confirmation that institutional entry is anticipated at the highest levels of policy discussion. Ripple Infrastructure and XRP Liquidity Highlighted Another central point in the commentary is the distinction between infrastructure readiness and market participation. X Finance Bull states that Ripple already has the necessary technology stack in place, while XRP provides the liquidity component needed for institutional-scale transactions. From his perspective, the payment rails are complete, removing operational barriers that might otherwise delay adoption once regulatory approval is secured. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 He further argues that this readiness places XRP in a unique position compared to other digital assets that may still be developing or testing their institutional use cases. The expectation is that once rules are finalized, institutions that have remained quiet over the past several years will publicly confirm both purchases and active usage of XRP. Long-Term Conviction Over Short-Term Volatility X Finance Bull also contrasts long-term research-driven conviction with short-term market reactions. He presents the recent selling pressure as inconsistent with the broader institutional narrative he describes, questioning the rationale behind investors’ decision to abandon positions when banks are preparing to increase their exposure. According to his evaluation, the upcoming regulatory decisions will reset market perception, redefining who can be deemed an early adopter of the asset. In general, the commentary asserts that the regulatory market structure is the critical action that could transform years of preparation into tangible demand for XRP. Banks are well-positioned to make a decisive move once the legal structure is established. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Pundit Says This Action Will Bring a Massive Demand for XRP appeared first on Times Tabloid .

23 Jan 2026, 23:50

Coinbase Listing Roadmap Unveils Strategic Pivot with Doodles and Moonbirds Integration

BitcoinWorld Coinbase Listing Roadmap Unveils Strategic Pivot with Doodles and Moonbirds Integration In a significant move for the digital asset ecosystem, leading cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase has formally added the native tokens for two premier NFT collections—Doodles (DOOD) and Moonbirds (BIRB)—to its official listing roadmap. This announcement, made public on April 2, 2025, from the company’s San Francisco headquarters, represents a pivotal validation for the evolving concept of tokenized digital collectibles. Consequently, it marks a strategic expansion beyond traditional cryptocurrencies for one of the world’s most regulated trading platforms. Coinbase Listing Roadmap Signals New Era for Tokenized Assets The Coinbase listing roadmap functions as a public, forward-looking indicator of assets under consideration for potential trading support. Importantly, inclusion on this roadmap does not guarantee a final listing. However, it initiates a rigorous technical and compliance integration process. The addition of DOOD and BIRB follows a clear trend of the exchange embracing assets from established cultural brands within Web3. Previously, the roadmap featured tokens like ApeCoin (APE) for the Bored Ape Yacht Club, which subsequently received full trading support. This pattern suggests a deliberate strategy by Coinbase to bridge the worlds of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and fungible, liquid cryptocurrency markets. Deep Dive: The Doodles and Moonbirds Ecosystem To understand the impact, one must examine the projects involved. Doodles is a vibrant, community-driven NFT collection launched in October 2021 by artists Scott Martin, Evan Keast, and Jordan Castro. The project rapidly gained fame for its cheerful aesthetic and strong brand partnerships. Subsequently, it expanded into music, events, and physical products. The DOOD token serves as the ecosystem’s governance and utility currency, empowering holders to vote on project direction and access exclusive experiences. Conversely, Moonbirds, created by Proof Collective, debuted in April 2022 as a collection of 10,000 pixelated owl NFTs. They quickly became notable for their “nesting” mechanism, which rewards long-term holders. The project emphasizes digital ownership and community building. The BIRB token, similarly, is designed for governance, allowing the community to steer the future of the Proof ecosystem, which includes a metaverse project and a conference. Expert Analysis on Market Structure Impact Market analysts view this development as a logical next step in asset maturation. “The tokenization of NFT community equity was an inevitable evolution,” notes Dr. Lena Chen, a blockchain economist at the Stanford Digital Asset Research Initiative. “Platforms like Coinbase providing a regulated on-ramp for these tokens significantly reduces friction for institutional and retail investors alike. It legitimizes the underlying IP and business models. Historically, similar roadmap announcements have correlated with increased trading volume and visibility for the associated projects across decentralized exchanges.” Data from DEX aggregators shows a 15% increase in trading pairs for DOOD and BIRB following the Coinbase announcement. The Regulatory and Compliance Landscape in 2025 The path to listing is fraught with regulatory scrutiny. Coinbase, as a publicly-traded US company, operates under intense oversight from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other financial authorities. The classification of these tokens—whether as securities, commodities, or something else—remains a core question. The exchange’s decision to advance them on the roadmap indicates its compliance teams have conducted preliminary analysis. Presumably, they believe the assets can meet the necessary legal standards. This process involves evaluating the token’s distribution, decentralization, and utility to assess its regulatory standing under current 2025 frameworks. Comparison of Doodles (DOOD) and Moonbirds (BIRB) Tokenomics Feature Doodles (DOOD) Moonbirds (BIRB) Primary Use Case Governance, ecosystem access Governance, Proof ecosystem utility Initial Distribution Airdrop to NFT holders & community treasury Airdrop to NFT holders & treasury Key Utility Voting on Doodles initiatives, event access Voting on Moonbirds/Proof direction, nesting rewards Parent Collection Size 10,000 NFTs 10,000 NFTs Potential Impacts on Liquidity and Valuation The immediate effect of the roadmap announcement was a positive price reaction for both tokens on secondary markets. More importantly, a full Coinbase listing typically unlocks substantial liquidity. It provides a trusted, insured, and user-friendly venue for millions of users. This access can dramatically increase an asset’s investor base. For the NFT collections themselves, liquid token markets create new dynamics. They allow fractional exposure to the brand’s value without purchasing a full NFT. Consequently, this could lead to increased overall valuation for the entire ecosystem. However, it also introduces higher volatility and correlation with broader crypto market movements. The Broader Trend of Cultural Asset Tokenization This event is not isolated. It reflects a macro-trend where intellectual property (IP) and cultural value are being fractionalized and traded on open markets. Other examples include tokenized music royalties, fan engagement tokens for sports teams, and digital fashion assets. Coinbase’s actions signal its belief in the longevity of this trend. By onboarding blue-chip NFT community tokens first, the exchange mitigates risk by choosing projects with proven track records, dedicated communities, and clear roadmaps. This strategy builds a foundation for potentially adding more niche tokenized assets in the future. Conclusion The addition of Doodles (DOOD) and Moonbirds (BIRB) to the Coinbase listing roadmap is a landmark event with multifaceted implications. It validates the tokenization model for top-tier NFT projects and provides a potential regulated gateway for mainstream capital. Furthermore, it underscores the continuing convergence of the fungible and non-fungible digital asset worlds. The move strengthens the position of both Coinbase and the featured projects within the evolving Web3 landscape. Ultimately, the successful navigation of the subsequent compliance and technical integration phases will set a critical precedent for the future of cultural asset liquidity on major exchanges. FAQs Q1: What does it mean to be on the Coinbase listing roadmap? A1: It means the asset is under official review for potential future listing. Coinbase is beginning the technical and legal compliance work required to support trading. It is a significant step, but not a guarantee of a final listing. Q2: Can I buy DOOD or BIRB on Coinbase today? A2: No. As of April 2025, these tokens are only on the listing roadmap. They are not yet available for trading on Coinbase. They can be traded on various decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and some other centralized platforms. Q3: Why would an NFT project create a separate token? A3: Creating a separate fungible token allows for community governance, easier distribution of rewards, and fractional ownership of the ecosystem’s value. It provides a liquid asset tied to the project’s success without requiring someone to buy a whole, expensive NFT. Q4: What are the risks associated with these tokens? A4: Risks include high volatility, regulatory uncertainty, market manipulation on less liquid venues, and the potential for the underlying NFT project to fail or lose cultural relevance. They are highly speculative assets. Q5: How does this affect current holders of Doodles or Moonbirds NFTs? A5: For existing NFT holders, this development could increase the visibility and perceived value of the overall brand. It may also provide more utility for any tokens they received via airdrop. However, it also means the project’s value becomes more tied to the volatile crypto token market. This post Coinbase Listing Roadmap Unveils Strategic Pivot with Doodles and Moonbirds Integration first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

23 Jan 2026, 23:28

Trump’s memecoin fails to rebound after a year from launch

The price of the Trump coin has dropped 93.4% over the past year. The interest in the president’s controversial cryptocurrency has diminished. Investors who bought at the highest prices face large losses due to the steep price drops, increasing criticism of the president’s crypto businesses. Trump’s inauguration hype turns into a 93.4% collapse The Trump coin went live on January 18, 2025. A year later, it’s trading at $4.84, down 93.4% from the highest point. The token dropped steeply after reaching its peak near the US president’s January 2025 inauguration. Before Trump’s January inauguration, the $TRUMP memecoin rose sharply from $1.20 to $73.43, per data from CoinGecko. In late 2023 and early 2024, investors showed intense excitement for memecoins . Anyone online can launch volatile crypto tokens. These tokens lack fundamental value, a business model, or cash flow. They depend on popularity and ties to viral events or famous people to attract speculative interest. A few days following the launch of the $TRUMP coin, Melania Trump introduced her own memecoin. According to aggregated data , the price soared to $13.05 but has since dropped to just under $0.15, a 99% decline from its highest point. The $MELANIA memecoin represents the classic pump and dump cycle of a memecoin. Even with its price drop, $TRUMP is still the sixth largest memecoin by market cap, per CoinGecko data. Official Trump (TRUMP) price chart. Source: CoinGecko . The Trumps made over $1 billion from crypto The Trumps made over $1 billion in pre-tax profits from crypto activities. “In the last couple of weeks alone, the Trump family added $1.3 BILLION to their wealth through their crypto schemes,” wrote the U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren on X. On-chain data shows TRUMP and MELANIA meme coins earned about $427 million from trading fees. The World Liberty Financial tokens (WLFI) made $550 million in profits. And the USD1 stablecoin had $2.7 billion in sales. Crypto experts, governance specialists, and Democrats have strongly condemned the president and his wife’s memecoins as a fast cash scheme and misuse of authority. After coming back to the White House, Trump supported the industry by naming pro-crypto regulators. The president granted pardons to high-profile crypto figures, including Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, and former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao. Trump and his family started multiple crypto companies including World Liberty Financial, and American Bitcoin. Governance experts want new US crypto rules in Washington to have strict safeguards against government conflicts of interest. Last week, Democracy Defenders Action and the Project on Government Oversight asked the Senate to ban the president and top officials from owning or trading cryptocurrencies. They warned that those in power could exploit the system, putting everyday investors at risk of fraud, manipulation, and abuse. The Trump companies have moved their focus to new ventures. According to Cryptopolitan, Trump Media will airdrop a new crypto token to DJT shareholders on February 2. The token distribution event will take place on the Cronos blockchain. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.