Invest ideasNews
3 Jun 2026, 10:02
Bitcoin Crash Hits $66K Support: Relief Bounce Incoming But More Pain Ahead
Tuesday saw a continuation of Bitcoin’s crash out of its 4-month bear flag. The price continued to plummet following Monday’s breakdown out of the bear flag and it was only the important $66K horizontal level that stopped the fall. A relief bounce has already begun, but more pain could be on the way once this has played out. Relief bounce into very negative market sentiment Source: TradingView The descent so far from the top of the bear flag to the recent local bottom is around 20.6%, or in dollar terms $17,000. Quite some correction already. Although there is possibly a lot more to come. As can be seen in the 4-hour chart above, once the $BTC price fell out of the bear flag, it was more or less straight down to the main horizontal support at $66,000 . Now heavily oversold, a relief rally would be expected, and which has already begun. The price has come back to the new resistance at $67,200, and besides having to break this, there are also two descending trendlines to be dealt with by the bulls. The first and shorter one is the recent downtrend from the bear flag break. Until this is broken we can expect the price to continue to trend down. The other much longer trendline guides the price down through the bear flag. Here it might be expected that the price at least comes back up to confirm the breakdown. As can be seen with the Stochastic RSI, the indicator lines are at the bottom and angled up. This is the same for the other shorter-term time frames, so potential upside momentum is going to be battling against dreadful market sentiment . Could this encourage the price to go sideways for a while? Could yet another bear flag form? Oversold vs. negative sentiment = bear flag? Source: TradingView The added bear flag in this daily time frame chart is pure speculation. It should probably be a lot shorter, but what it does do is explain how the $BTC price could react in the scenario of a very bearish market opposed to very oversold conditions. Of course, the bounce could go higher or the drop could resume as market forces do their thing. As it stands, the bears are very much in control. The bulls did have their day in the sun when the price hit the top of the bear flag, but it was still a bear flag, and once the rejection came in, it’s been downward ever since. Bitcoin is in a bear market - it’s pure and simple. Until a bottom has been painfully carved out, and real capitulation has taken place, the next bull market will remain in abeyance. 200-week SMA could help to predict bear market bottom Source: TradingView The weekly chart for the $BTC price provides a thought-provoking picture. The bull market trendline is not far below the price now. What is very interesting is how the 200-week SMA has followed this trendline almost exactly. These are potentially going to provide a major barrier to a further fall in the price. Nevertheless, if we look left at the last bear market, it can be noted that the $BTC price did fall below the 200-week moving average. It might also be interesting to know that the furthest the price got from the bottom of the 200-week SMA was a pretty hefty 33%. If we transplanted that situation to the current one, 33% below the 200-week SMA would take the price down to the low $40K area. $44,700 is already earmarked as the full measured move out of the bear flag. Could a bottom materialise in this vicinity? Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
3 Jun 2026, 09:31
XLM’s Stablecoin Settlement Angle: Can Stellar Benefit From the Yen and Sterling Race?
FX settlement is splitting in two directions at once: regulated stablecoins are moving closer to production in major currencies, while payments and remittance networks keep searching for cheaper, always-on rails. If yen and sterling stablecoins are next to scale, which blockchain is positioned to catch the flows? Stellar is suddenly back in the conversation. In early June, MoneyGram unveiled an on-Stellar USD stablecoin, MGUSD, with a roadmap into its global cash-in/cash-out footprint, while DTCC selected Stellar as the first public chain to connect to its tokenized securities settlement initiative. A growing payments stack is forming around the network. The question for builders and treasury teams : can Stellar, and by extension XLM’s utility, benefit from a yen–sterling sprint? This article breaks down the mechanics, trade-offs, and a hands-on plan to test corridors without stepping on regulatory landmines. AspectWhat to KnowWhat changed in 2026MoneyGram launched MGUSD natively on Stellar with a planned global rollout ( CoinDesk ); DTCC chose Stellar as the first public chain for its tokenized-securities connection ( CoinDesk ); Mesh added Stellar as a core settlement layer ( PR Newswire (Mesh) ).Yen momentumJapan Blockchain Foundation plans a trust-type, yen-pegged EJPY on JOC and Ethereum to avoid transaction caps on other issuer models ( The Block ).Sterling outlookThe Bank of England is rethinking parts of its stablecoin regime, including holding caps and non-interest reserve requirements, after industry feedback ( GN Crypto News ).Stellar’s anglePurpose-built for fiat settlement with anchors, a built-in orderbook DEX, and low-fee, fast-finality transfers—plus fresh institutional links (MGUSD issuance partners and DTCC connectivity reports).Main risksRegulatory shifts in the UK/Japan, issuer concentration and reserve quality, liquidity fragmentation across chains, smart-contract and bridge risks, FX slippage in off-peak hours.Who should actRemitters, PSPs, neobanks, exporters, market makers, and crypto treasuries looking to cut cross-border costs and test yen/sterling corridors before full-scale launches. Core Concepts: How Stablecoin Settlement Actually Moves Stablecoin settlement is not just “sending a token.” A complete flow spans on-ramps, currency conversion, on-chain transfers, and off-ramps—plus compliance checks throughout. If you are moving USD to JPY or GBP, there are two broad models today: convert on-chain using orderbooks/AMMs, or pre-arrange FX with a liquidity provider and settle delivery-versus-payment across wallets. Stellar’s design is pragmatic for that second model. The network supports issued assets (including fiat tokens) via anchors and features built-in path payments to route through intermediate assets if needed. While XLM is the native token for fees and can act as a bridge asset, most institutional users aim for stablecoin-to-stablecoin legs to reduce market risk; XLM’s role becomes a lubricant for fees and, at times, a liquidity hop. The new 2026 developments matter because they thicken the rails. MoneyGram’s MGUSD launched natively on Stellar with issuance by Bridge (Stripe) and smart-contract and wallet partners including M0 and Fireblocks, with a planned global rollout across tens of millions of customers and hundreds of thousands of agent locations ( CoinDesk ). DTCC’s reported selection of Stellar as its first public-chain connection for tokenized securities settlement signals institutional seriousness about using the network as plumbing ( CoinDesk ). And Mesh said it will establish Stellar as a core settlement layer for its crypto payments ecosystem ( PR Newswire (Mesh) ). Glossary for this discussion Anchor: A regulated entity that issues fiat tokens on Stellar and provides on/off-ramps between bank accounts/cash and on-chain assets. Path payment: A Stellar feature that routes payments through multiple assets to achieve a desired destination currency at a quoted rate. Trust-type stablecoin: A structure (e.g., in Japan) where reserves are held in a trust, which may qualify for different treatment versus other e-money/issuer models. Systemic stablecoin: A stablecoin considered systemically important by a regulator; often subject to stricter caps, reserve, and operational requirements. On-/off-ramp: Services that convert between fiat and on-chain assets (and vice versa), including cash agent networks and bank integrations. Liquidity provider: A market maker or OTC desk that quotes FX/stablecoin pairs and stands ready to buy/sell to keep spreads tight. Step-by-Step Playbook Define the target corridor and counterparties. Pick one lane (e.g., US–JP or UK–JP) and align legal entities, KYC policies, and settlement cutoffs with partners on both ends. Choose the asset mix. For the USD leg, evaluate MGUSD on Stellar ( CoinDesk ). For JPY, track EJPY timelines on JOC/Ethereum ( The Block ). For GBP, follow pending UK rules that could shape issuer design ( GN Crypto News ). Pick custody and wallet infrastructure. If you need institution-grade controls, shortlist providers that already support Stellar assets (e.g., Fireblocks is cited in the MGUSD stack) and enforce policy-based approvals. Secure on-/off-ramps. Where cash is involved, assess MoneyGram’s planned global MGUSD rollout to leverage agent locations for last‑mile delivery ( CoinDesk ) and identify bank partners for GBP/JPY redemption. Arrange liquidity. Negotiate quotes with market makers for USD/JPY/GBP pairs and test Stellar’s orderbook depth. Pre-fund buffers to avoid failed settlements during local bank holidays. Automate compliance. Map Travel Rule and local AML requirements; implement screening and proof-of-funds checks before authorizing payouts. Document how you’ll respond to recalls or sanctions updates. Pilot and measure. Run a 2–4 week controlled pilot with tight limits. Track total cost (FX + spreads + on/off fees + chain fees), speed from initiation to cash-out, and failure/error rates. Harden operations. Add monitoring, key management drills, and incident runbooks. Define fallbacks (e.g., switch to bank rails) if chain congestion or issuer downtime occurs. Yen vs. Sterling: Different Roads to a Regulated Stablecoin Japan’s stablecoin path is technical and structural. The Japan Blockchain Foundation’s plan for EJPY adopts a trust-type model and will launch on Japan Open Chain (JOC) and Ethereum; the trust design aims to avoid a 1 million‑yen per‑transaction cap tied to other issuer types ( The Block ). That setup could fast-track higher-value B2B flows once live. The immediate catch is fragmentation: EJPY starts on JOC and Ethereum, not Stellar, so any use on Stellar would require a native issuance, a designated anchor, or a robust bridge/wrapping model—and each comes with operational and regulatory overhead. The UK story is regulatory calibration. The Bank of England signaled it is reconsidering elements of its regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins—specifically caps and the proposal for 40% of reserves to sit as non‑interest‑bearing Bank deposits—after pushback from industry ( GN Crypto News ). This rethink may determine who issues GBP tokens (banks vs. non-banks), reserve composition, and how attractive a GBP stablecoin becomes for treasurers. Where does Stellar fit in this two-speed world? As a settlement layer connecting USD liquidity to non‑USD corridors. MoneyGram’s MGUSD provides a native USD leg with a roadmap to broad distribution across its user base and agent network ( CoinDesk ). If a credible GBP stablecoin emerges under a refined UK regime, and if yen liquidity becomes available via an anchor or wrapped model, Stellar’s path payments and anchors can stitch these legs together at low network cost. The orchestration work—liquidity, custody, and compliance—remains off-chain, but the hop between trusted endpoints can be more efficient. Where Stellar Could Fit: Gateways, On/Off-Ramps, and Institutional Rails Three 2026 signals expand Stellar’s institutional story. First, MGUSD’s launch—issued by Bridge (Stripe) with M0 and Fireblocks in the stack—anchors a regulated USD token directly on the network ( CoinDesk ). Second, DTCC’s choice of Stellar as the first public chain connected to its forthcoming tokenized-securities settlement platform suggests operational comfort with the protocol for high-stakes workflows ( CoinDesk ). Third, Mesh’s integration naming Stellar a core settlement layer implies broader payments interoperability in wallets and apps ( PR Newswire (Mesh) ). Combined, these could make Stellar a natural hub for USD‑to‑GBP/JPY triangles: USD liquidity in via MGUSD, conversion via market makers or orderbooks, and payouts via bank partners or cash agents. For operators who already manage multi-chain liquidity, Stellar becomes one more low‑friction venue—especially when cash-out optionality matters. Pro tip: When testing corridors, benchmark spreads using both on-chain orderbooks and pre-agreed OTC quotes during Asia open, London open, and the crossover. FX slippage often spikes in thin windows; your routing should be time-aware. RailSettlement highlightsInstitutional hooks (examples)Fit for JPY/GBP corridorsKey trade-offsStellarIssued assets via anchors; built-in orderbook; low fees and fast finalityMGUSD launch; DTCC connectivity report; Mesh integration ( CoinDesk , CoinDesk , PR Newswire (Mesh) )Strong if GBP/JPY tokens or wrapped forms are available; excellent for USD legNeeds reliable GBP/JPY issuance or bridging; liquidity depth varies by pairEthereumDeepest issuer ecosystem; mature custody and compliance toolingEJPY planned on Ethereum alongside JOC ( The Block )High; especially for institutional JPY pilots and GBP if regulated issuers launchFees/throughput vary; may require L2s; fragmented liquidity across L2sTRONLarge stablecoin transfer volumes; low-cost, fast confirmationPopular for USDT flows in emerging-market remittancesUseful for USD leg; JPY/GBP availability depends on future issuersPerception/regulatory scrutiny in some jurisdictions; issuer concentrationXRPLDesigned for remittance and issued currencies; DEX and payment channelsStrong financial-institution focus historicallyPlausible for GBP/JPY if compliant issuers appearIssuer availability and liquidity depth are the swing factors Scenarios to Plan For (2026–2027) Base case: USD‑anchored corridors grow first. MGUSD adoption expands through MoneyGram’s channels, improving USD cash-in/cash-out. Market makers quote tighter USD/JPY/GBP pairs on Stellar, but yen and sterling tokens arrive via wrapping or limited direct issuance. Outcome: Stellar handles more USD legs; XLM utility rises primarily as fee and routing grease. Upside case: GBP and JPY issuance align with low-friction rules. The Bank of England finalizes a commercially viable framework; a bank or well-capitalized issuer launches GBP on one or more chains. EJPY scales beyond pilots with clear redemption. Liquidity providers support deep books on Stellar or provide efficient bridging. Outcome: Full FX triangles (USD–GBP–JPY) settle across anchors with competitive spreads; Stellar captures material settlement share. Downside case: Regulatory drag and fragmented liquidity. UK rules impose caps or costly reserve mandates; EJPY remains limited to walled-garden use cases. USD legs thrive, but non‑USD tokens stay siloed. Outcome: Multi-chain hopping adds cost; Stellar still adds value for USD remittance but sees muted GBP/JPY volumes. Pitfalls & Red Flags Issuer opacity: Demand attestation cadence and asset composition for any GBP/JPY token you rely on; treasury guidelines should limit concentration to one issuer. Regulatory whiplash: The BoE’s ongoing rethink means parameters can change late in the game; Japan’s framework differences by issuer type require careful scoping ( GN Crypto News , The Block ). Bridging risk: If yen or sterling live on other chains, a bridge/wrapper becomes a critical dependency; assess security assumptions and emergency procedures. FX thin-liquidity windows: Spreads widen around regional holidays and rollovers; automate time-aware routing and use multiple liquidity sources. Operational single points of failure: Over-reliance on one custodian, one RPC provider, or one off-ramp can halt payouts; build redundancy. Compliance gaps: Ensure Travel Rule coverage and sanctions screening across all participants, including agents in cash-out networks. If you want ongoing, sober coverage of stablecoin policy and market structure, Crypto Daily tracks the intersection of payments, regulation, and on-chain rails. Visit Crypto Daily for weekly updates and interviews. Frequently Asked Questions Does XLM have to be used if most settlement is stablecoin-to-stablecoin? No. XLM is required for network fees and may serve as a path asset, but many institutional flows aim for stablecoin-to-stablecoin conversion to minimize market risk. XLM’s role is largely transactional utility rather than mandatory exposure. How would a yen or sterling stablecoin reach Stellar if it’s launched on other chains? Three routes: a native issuer (anchor) mints the asset on Stellar; a trusted bridge wraps the token; or an off-chain provider runs synchronized ledgers and redeems 1:1 across networks. Each path involves different security, legal, and operational trade-offs. What exactly was reported about DTCC and Stellar, and why does it matter? DTCC chose Stellar as the first public blockchain to connect to its upcoming tokenized-securities settlement platform, according to reporting in late May 2026. This signals comfort with Stellar’s reliability for institutional workflows, even if retail access is indirect ( CoinDesk ). Is MoneyGram’s MGUSD the same as USDC or USDT? No. It’s a separate USD-backed stablecoin issued by Bridge (Stripe) on Stellar, with M0 and Fireblocks named among partners and a planned global rollout via MoneyGram’s channels ( CoinDesk ). Each USD token has its own issuer, reserves policy, and risk profile. How soon could GBP or JPY stablecoins impact remittances? Timelines depend on regulation and issuer readiness. Japan’s EJPY is planned on JOC and Ethereum ( The Block ), while the BoE is revisiting key rules that affect GBP viability ( GN Crypto News ). Expect phased pilots before meaningful retail availability. What should builders track week to week to judge Stellar’s advantage? Watch: (1) on-/off-ramp coverage (e.g., MGUSD rollout cadence), (2) GBP/JPY issuer announcements and redemption terms, (3) DEX/OTC spreads for USD/JPY/GBP pairs on Stellar, and (4) new institutional integrations such as custody, wallets, or payment networks like Mesh ( PR Newswire (Mesh) ). Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
3 Jun 2026, 08:50
'Happy Birthday, XRP': Ripple CTO Emeritus Schwartz Reminds What Core Idea Was Amid Washington Expansion
Ripple's legend turns back the clock to XRP's 2012 roots just as the company deploys a massive D.C. lobbying push for the Senate's CLARITY vote.
3 Jun 2026, 08:50
CLARITY Act Reaches Senate Legislative Calendar — Is XRP About to Get a Fresh Tailwind?
CLARITY Act Lands on Senate Calendar, Bringing XRP Closer to Long-Awaited Regulatory Certainty The Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act has moved another step forward in Washington after being placed on the U.S. Senate Legislative Calendar, signaling that a full floor vote could be on the horizon in the coming months. The move follows a 15–9 approval from the Senate Banking Committee last month, reflecting growing bipartisan momentum behind efforts to build a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States. For the crypto industry, the development adds fresh optimism to the weighty issue of regulatory uncertainty. The CLARITY Act aims to define how digital assets are classified and clarify which federal agencies oversee them, a foundational step that supporters say could unlock innovation, draw institutional capital, and give market participants the confidence to scale operations in a regulated environment. The implications are particularly significant for XRP. Ripple has been previously involved in a fierce battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) where XRP’s non-security status was ultimately cemented. CLARITY Act Momentum Could Mark a Turning Point for XRP and U.S. Crypto Regulation With the CLARITY Act, a formal market structure framework could help ease concerns among banks, payment providers, exchanges, and investors with the SEC already affirming that XRP is a digital commodity. What’s next? Well, if the Senate passes the bill, it will still need to be reconciled with the House version before reaching the President for final approval. Therefore, its placement on the Senate calendar is a welcome procedural advancement in a process the crypto industry has been watching closely. Lawmakers, including Senator Cynthia Lummis, have emphasized the urgency of establishing clear rules for digital assets, warning that failure to act in this legislative cycle could delay comprehensive crypto regulation until 2030. For XRP and the wider digital asset market, the CLARITY Act is increasingly viewed as more than routine legislation. It represents a potential turning point toward regulatory certainty, one that could reshape institutional participation and accelerate long-term adoption in one of the world’s most influential financial markets.
3 Jun 2026, 08:40
Qingdao Prosecutors Rule Bitcoin Qualifies as Property Under Chinese Criminal Law in Landmark Theft Case
BitcoinWorld Qingdao Prosecutors Rule Bitcoin Qualifies as Property Under Chinese Criminal Law in Landmark Theft Case Prosecutors in Qingdao, China, have formally determined that Bitcoin qualifies as property under the country’s criminal law, marking a significant legal clarification in a case involving the theft of 107 Bitcoin. The ruling, reported by local Chinese media, sets a precedent for how digital assets may be treated in criminal proceedings within China’s strict regulatory environment. Case Details and Sentencing The defendant, identified by the surname Zhang, was sentenced to 10 years and nine months in prison and fined 100,000 yuan (approximately $13,800). According to court documents, Zhang obtained the victim’s cryptocurrency wallet recovery phrase and used it to transfer and sell the stolen Bitcoin. The prosecution successfully argued that Bitcoin meets the legal definition of property because it holds economic value and can be exclusively controlled by an owner. The value of the theft was calculated based on the more than 660,000 yuan (over $91,000) that Zhang received from selling the stolen Bitcoin, rather than the market value at the time of the crime. This distinction is important for future cases, as it establishes a method for valuing stolen cryptocurrency in Chinese courts. Legal Implications for Cryptocurrency in China China has maintained a broad ban on cryptocurrency trading and mining since 2021, but this ruling clarifies that digital assets are not beyond the reach of criminal law. The Qingdao prosecutors’ decision aligns with earlier civil court rulings that recognized Bitcoin as property protected by law, even while the government restricts its use in financial markets. Legal experts note that this distinction allows authorities to prosecute theft, fraud, and other crimes involving cryptocurrency without legitimizing it as a financial instrument. The ruling could encourage more victims of crypto-related crimes to report incidents to police, knowing that prosecutors have a framework to pursue charges. Broader Context and Market Impact This case arrives amid growing global debate over the legal classification of digital assets. While countries like the United States and Japan have established regulatory frameworks, China’s approach remains uniquely restrictive yet pragmatic. The Qingdao ruling suggests that Chinese authorities are developing nuanced legal tools to address cryptocurrency-related crime without altering the overall ban on trading. For cryptocurrency holders in China, the ruling provides a measure of legal protection against theft, though it does not signal any relaxation of trading restrictions. The case also highlights the risks associated with storing recovery phrases insecurely, as a single compromised phrase can lead to total loss of funds. Conclusion The Qingdao prosecutors’ ruling that Bitcoin constitutes property under criminal law represents a practical evolution in China’s legal treatment of digital assets. While the government maintains its prohibition on cryptocurrency trading, this decision ensures that victims of theft have legal recourse and that criminals cannot exploit regulatory ambiguity to evade justice. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of secure storage practices and the growing intersection between traditional criminal law and emerging digital asset technologies. FAQs Q1: Does this ruling mean Bitcoin is legal in China? No. China maintains a ban on cryptocurrency trading and mining. This ruling only recognizes Bitcoin as property for the purpose of criminal law, allowing prosecution of theft and fraud cases. It does not legalize trading or ownership for investment purposes. Q2: How was the value of the stolen Bitcoin calculated? The court used the actual amount the defendant received from selling the stolen Bitcoin — more than 660,000 yuan (about $91,000) — rather than the market price at the time of the theft. This approach provides a clear valuation method for future cases. Q3: What is a recovery phrase and why is it important? A recovery phrase, also known as a seed phrase, is a set of words that can restore access to a cryptocurrency wallet. Anyone who obtains this phrase can control the wallet and transfer its funds. Keeping it secure is critical to preventing theft. This post Qingdao Prosecutors Rule Bitcoin Qualifies as Property Under Chinese Criminal Law in Landmark Theft Case first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
3 Jun 2026, 08:13
What XRP Expects As Clarity Act Is Officially Added to the Senate Legislative Calendar
Crypto researcher SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) shared an update that XRP holders have been waiting on. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R.3633) now sits on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders, Calendar No. 423, as of June 1, 2026. SMQKE’s post was direct: “The Clarity Act has officially been added to the Senate Legislative Calendar.” The bill has already passed the House. One step remains before it reaches the President’s desk: the Senate must vote, and the XRP army is waiting for a date. The Clarity Act has officially been added to the Senate Legislative Calendar. https://t.co/rbsRK7wvsd pic.twitter.com/H1lKzNneyi — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) June 2, 2026 Where the Bill Stands H.R.3633 was introduced in 2025 and moved through the House Financial Services and Agriculture Committees before clearing the full House. On May 14, 2026, the Senate Banking Committee advanced it in a 15-9 bipartisan vote . Now it awaits a full Senate floor vote. The bill needs 60 votes to clear the filibuster threshold. That means at least 7 Senate Democrats must cross over. Lawmakers face pressure to move before the August recess, as time on the legislative calendar is limited. What Does This Mean for XRP? The SEC sued Ripple in December 2020, creating years of regulatory uncertainty that kept institutional money on the sidelines. A 2023 court ruling cleared secondary-market XRP transactions from securities classification. Then, in March 2026, the SEC and CFTC jointly classified XRP as a digital commodity alongside Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, and other select digital assets. While XRP has full legal clarity, the problem is that both of those determinations can be reversed. A new administration or a policy shift at either agency could change XRP’s status overnight. The CLARITY Act fixes that, locking XRP’s commodity classification into permanent federal law. That matters for institutional adoption. Large allocators require legislative certainty, not court rulings or agency guidance, before building products around an asset. XRP has already received significant institutional attention , and many experts believe the CLARITY Act could accelerate this adoption. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 The Case for XRP Is Building There is a second catalyst running in parallel. On May 19, President Trump signed an executive order directing the Federal Reserve to review crypto firms’ access to its payment infrastructure. Ripple is among the firms named. A Federal Reserve master account would let Ripple settle transactions directly through Fedwire and FedNow. If both the Clarity Act passes and Ripple secures that account, analysts project massive growth for XRP. The bill is now on the calendar. Senate leadership must still announce the floor debate and voting dates. All eyes are on Washington to see when that happens. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post What XRP Expects As Clarity Act Is Officially Added to the Senate Legislative Calendar appeared first on Times Tabloid .
