hodler

2 Jun 2026, 13:05

Strive Bolsters Bitcoin Treasury with 2,500 BTC Acquisition, Total Holdings Reach 19,000

BitcoinWorld Strive Bolsters Bitcoin Treasury with 2,500 BTC Acquisition, Total Holdings Reach 19,000 Strive, an asset manager pursuing a deliberate Bitcoin accumulation strategy, has added another 2,500 BTC to its corporate treasury, according to a report from CoinDesk. The firm acquired the latest tranche at an average price of $74,092 per Bitcoin, bringing its total holdings to 19,000 BTC. Institutional Accumulation Continues This latest purchase underscores Strive’s continued commitment to building a significant Bitcoin reserve as part of its broader asset management approach. The acquisition at a price point above $74,000 signals confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition despite market volatility. With 19,000 BTC now under management, Strive ranks among the more prominent institutional holders of the digital asset, though its position remains smaller than that of major corporate treasuries like MicroStrategy. Market Context and Implications The purchase comes during a period of relatively stable Bitcoin prices, with the asset trading in a range between $70,000 and $78,000 over recent weeks. Institutional accumulation patterns have drawn attention from market analysts who view such steady buying as a potential indicator of sustained demand from professional investors. Strive’s strategy reflects a broader trend among asset managers and corporations treating Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset rather than a speculative trade. Why This Matters to Investors For market participants, Strive’s continued accumulation provides a data point on institutional sentiment. The firm’s willingness to add to its position at current price levels suggests internal conviction that Bitcoin’s risk-reward profile remains favorable. Investors monitoring corporate Bitcoin strategies often view such moves as signals of confidence in the asset’s long-term trajectory, though each firm’s specific investment thesis and risk tolerance may vary. Conclusion Strive’s latest Bitcoin acquisition reinforces the narrative of growing institutional adoption of digital assets as part of diversified treasury management. With total holdings now at 19,000 BTC, the firm continues to execute its stated accumulation strategy, providing another example of how traditional asset managers are integrating cryptocurrency into their portfolios. FAQs Q1: How much Bitcoin does Strive now hold? Strive’s total Bitcoin holdings have reached 19,000 BTC following the latest purchase of 2,500 BTC. Q2: What was the average purchase price for Strive’s latest Bitcoin acquisition? The firm acquired the 2,500 BTC at an average price of $74,092 per Bitcoin. Q3: Why is Strive buying Bitcoin? Strive is pursuing a deliberate Bitcoin accumulation strategy as part of its asset management approach, treating Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset for long-term value preservation. This post Strive Bolsters Bitcoin Treasury with 2,500 BTC Acquisition, Total Holdings Reach 19,000 first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

2 Jun 2026, 12:48

Kevin O’Leary reveals ‘the next big thing in crypto’

Kevin O’Leary declared that the next big crypto opportunity could be the blockchain that secures adoption by at least one S&P 500 company in each of the 11 sectors. In an X post on June 1, O’Leary stated that the next big thing in crypto is the blockchain that standardizes the real-world utility for the S&P 500 companies. As such, Mr Wonderful concluded that the crypto asset whose blockchain gets integrated with S&P 500 companies may experience parabolic growth. “So I think the next big thing in crypto is which of these chains is going to get at least one company in all 11 sectors of the S&P. Because the minute that occurs, you wanna go long that token,” O’Leary stated . Currently, the investor remains bullish on Bitcoin ( BTC ) and Ethereum ( ETH ) despite their significant drawdowns from their respective all-time highs (ATH). Furthermore, O’Leary believes that most of the crypto assets are ‘dead’, especially after the October 2025 capitulation event. Consequently, he argued that any blockchain that assists any S&P 500 company in managing inventory, providing logistics, and handling contracts could recover fast. Why are S&P 500 companies not using crypto yet? While the desire for S&P 500 companies to use blockchain to streamline their operations remains high, O’Leary said the legal issues remain a major headwind. Furthermore, the blockchain industry in the United States continues to operate in a grey area without the passage of the Clarity Act – a proposed federal regulation aimed at legalizing crypto assets. Additionally, O’Leary highlighted that major Wall Street firms continue to watch the Web3 space from the sidelines due to a lack of security standards. Moreover, most of the top blockchains have not yet implemented tested, reliable privacy-centric smart contracts that can help onboard S&P 500 companies at scale. As a result, major blockchains that introduce enhanced security standards amid the passage of the Clarity Act could be among the top of the list of the next big thing in crypto. The post Kevin O’Leary reveals ‘the next big thing in crypto’ appeared first on Finbold .

2 Jun 2026, 12:35

Capital B seeks $122B funding mandate to buy more Bitcoin

Capital B is asking shareholders to approve up to $122 billion in capital-raising authority to accelerate its Bitcoin treasury strategy.

2 Jun 2026, 11:07

Crypto treasury inflows fall to lowest level since 2024

Bitcoin treasury firms made up nearly all May inflows, but BTC-linked capital formation also dropped sharply from April.

2 Jun 2026, 11:00

Ethereum Foundation President Breaks Silence On New Mandate And Internal Tensions

Ethereum Foundation President Aya Miyaguchi has laid out her view of the organization’s new mandate, framing the shift as a necessary reset after internal debates became increasingly strained and the Foundation faced pressure to be too many things at once. Her comments, posted on X after Vitalik Buterin shared his own view of the Foundation’s direction, arrive during a sensitive period for Ethereum’s core nonprofit. The EF is moving toward a smaller, more focused structure while the broader ecosystem debates its governance role, technical priorities and a wave of high-profile departures. Ethereum Foundation Enters New Power Era Miyaguchi said the mandate came from the board, but that she proposed it late last year. The trigger, in her telling, was not a single dispute but a structural problem: EF had become a focal point for competing expectations. “First, debates that were meant to be technical had started to become political and personal, and at times shaped by quieter incentives,” she wrote. “Second, as EF grew, more and more versions of ‘what EF should be’ began pulling at the core of the organization from every direction at once. I became convinced that trying to satisfy all of them would leave us achieving nothing at all.” That line goes to the center of the Foundation’s dilemma. Ethereum has long relied on EF for research funding, coordination and stewardship, but its culture has also resisted the idea that any single entity should become Ethereum’s command center. Miyaguchi leaned heavily into that tension, arguing that EF’s reduced centrality is not a retreat from responsibility but proof that Ethereum has matured beyond its first institution. “We have said it many times: EF is one of many nodes in Ethereum,” she wrote. “I know that is hard to hear for some, because EF was the first group, and in the early years it was essential for making things happen. But it was never meant to stay that way.” Miyaguchi connected that philosophy to her own history in crypto, noting that she has been in the sector since 2012 and joined Kraken in 2013 shortly before the collapse of Mt. Gox , which she said she helped clean up. That experience, she argued, shaped her understanding of both growth and centralization risk. When she became executive director in 2018, her goal was to help Ethereum grow beyond EF. The Foundation, she said, made deliberate choices to distribute power rather than retain control. Miyaguchi pointed to EF’s role in incubating and releasing projects such as Uniswap and ENS, supporting ETHGlobal and hackathons, and “funding the funders” through groups such as Gitcoin and Moloch. The guiding question, she said, was always: “how does this stand on its own, without us?” That strategy, according to Miyaguchi, has left EF with less than 0.2% of all ETH and a role that is now narrower by design. The mandate, she said, is to preserve and accelerate the properties and goals that make Ethereum “uniquely valuable, competitive, and worth building on,” centered on what she called CROPS and “inalienable user self-sovereignty and self-sovereign coordination.” “We cannot do it alone, and we do not intend to,” she wrote. “But defining this as the north star for the mission, and coordinating with the allies who share it, is the responsibility we are keeping.” Miyaguchi also pushed back against the idea that a sharper EF means less concern for adoption. She said the opposite is true, arguing that everyday users and institutions both depend on Ethereum’s underlying value proposition. Adoption, including institutional adoption, remains part of EF’s work, she said, but only in ways that fit the mission. The comments come as EF has seen a notable exodus of senior and high-profile contributors in 2026, including researchers and ecosystem figures such as Carl Beekhuizen, Julian Ma, Barnabé Monnot, Tim Beiko, Trent Van Epps, Josh Stark and former co-executive director Tomasz Stańczak. That turnover has intensified scrutiny over whether the Foundation’s restructuring is a sign of healthy decentralization, internal strain, or both. Miyaguchi acknowledged the personnel implications directly. “As EF becomes more focused and more opinionated, the team naturally becomes smaller and more concentrated. That is part of the choice,” she wrote, adding that new leaders are already stepping into the mission and that management will provide more details on the new structure and strategy in the coming weeks. Buterin’s May 24 post set the stage for Miyaguchi’s remarks. He described the EF as still being in transition, emphasized that he does not hold special power over the board, and said another leader is executing much of the current transition. He also framed the Foundation’s future as leaner and more focused, with less emphasis on being the center of Ethereum and more emphasis on preserving the network’s long-term properties. At press time, ETH traded at $1,986.

2 Jun 2026, 10:35

Kalshi Files to Launch XRP Perpetual Futures in US

Kalshi issues new proposal to the SEC to officially bring perpetual futures for XRP and other major crypto assets to the U.S. market.