hodler

14 May 2026, 12:12

How Is the World’s Largest Solana Treasury Firm Down $1B in SOL Crash?

Forward Industries is facing a large unrealized loss on its Solana treasury after building one of the biggest listed corporate SOL positions near much higher market prices. The company holds nearly 6.98 million SOL, acquired at an average cost of about $232 per token. With Solana trading near $91 in mid-May, the position is worth roughly $637 million, compared with a purchase cost near $1.59 billion. That leaves Forward Industries with an estimated paper loss close to $983 million. The loss remains unrealized because the company has not sold the full position. However, the lower market value has already affected reported financial results through digital asset impairment charges. Forward reported a Q1 2026 loss of $585.6 million, with $560.2 million tied to digital asset markdowns. Source: X Forward became the largest listed Solana-focused treasury after raising capital through a $1.65 billion private investment in public equity. The PIPE was backed by major crypto investors including Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto and Multicoin Capital. The company used that financing to build a large Solana reserve during a period of stronger market sentiment. Solana Price Drop Drives Treasury Loss Forward’s Solana treasury has been hit mainly by the decline in SOL’s market price. The company accumulated its holdings at an average level far above current trading prices. At about $232 per SOL, Forward’s cost basis reflects purchases made when investor interest in Solana treasury strategies was higher. As SOL fell toward $91, the market value of the position dropped by more than 50%. The accounting damage appears in quarterly earnings through impairment charges. These are non-cash charges linked to lower asset values, but they still reduce reported earnings and shareholder equity. Forward has also seen pressure in its stock price. FWDI traded above $39 during the earlier phase of enthusiasm around its Solana strategy. The stock has since fallen toward the $5 range, reflecting weaker sentiment toward SOL treasury companies and concerns over balance sheet exposure. The company continues to stake nearly all of its Solana holdings. Staking may generate yield, but it does not erase the unrealized loss created by the difference between purchase price and current market value. Solana Treasury Firms Face Wider Pressure Forward is not alone. Several public companies that adopted Solana treasury strategies are also holding positions below cost. Sharps Technology reportedly invested about $389 million to $403 million in SOL near higher market levels. Its 2.07 million SOL position has fallen to an estimated value of roughly $167 million to $196 million. Upexi holds more than 2.17 million SOL and has reported losses tied to the decline in its Solana treasury. DeFi Development Corp. holds about 2.29 million SOL and SOL equivalents, while other listed firms such as Solana Company also recorded digital asset impairment charges. Source: Treasuries Together, public companies holding Solana as treasury reserves are facing more than $1.5 billion in combined unrealized paper losses. These losses are concentrated among firms that accumulated SOL aggressively near market peaks. The situation shows how treasury strategies linked to volatile crypto assets can create sharp swings in reported results. When token prices rise, balance sheets can appear stronger. When prices fall, the same holdings can create large non-cash losses. Staking Revenue Offers Partial Offset Forward and other Solana treasury firms use staking to generate income from their SOL holdings. Forward’s staked SOL has reportedly produced a gross annual yield near 6.73%. Staking income can support operating revenue and help treasury firms increase token exposure over time. However, staking yield is small compared with the decline from a $232 average purchase price to current levels near $91. DeFi Development Corp. reported a 108% increase in SOL per share over the past year, reaching 0.0670 SOL per share as of May 13. The firm said it uses internal staking, validator operations and on-chain deployment strategies to grow SOL per share. At the same time, DeFi Development posted a Q1 net loss of $83.4 million, compared with a $778,000 loss a year earlier. The company said the loss reflected lower market values for digital asset holdings, even as revenue rose sharply to $2.66 million. Forward’s position depends heavily on Solana’s future price direction. A recovery in SOL would reduce the paper loss and improve treasury value. Continued weakness would keep pressure on earnings, equity value and investor confidence.

14 May 2026, 11:30

Trump Extends White House Invitation to Chinese President Xi Jinping for September 24

BitcoinWorld Trump Extends White House Invitation to Chinese President Xi Jinping for September 24 President Donald Trump has formally invited Chinese President Xi Jinping to the White House for a visit on September 24, according to an announcement made by the US leader. The invitation signals a potential step toward renewed high-level dialogue between the world’s two largest economies, amid ongoing trade tensions and geopolitical competition. Background and Context The proposed meeting comes at a critical juncture in US-China relations. Trade disputes, technology restrictions, and strategic rivalries have dominated the bilateral agenda in recent years. A face-to-face summit could provide an opportunity for both leaders to address key issues, including tariff policies, supply chain realignments, and regional security concerns. Trump’s announcement was made without immediate confirmation from Beijing. Chinese officials have not yet publicly responded to the invitation. Historically, such invitations are carefully negotiated, and the final date may be subject to change based on mutual scheduling and preparatory talks. Implications for Trade and Diplomacy A White House meeting would mark one of the most significant diplomatic engagements between the two countries in recent years. Analysts suggest that a summit could lead to progress on stalled trade negotiations, though expectations remain tempered. The US has maintained a firm stance on issues such as intellectual property protection, forced technology transfer, and market access for American companies. For markets and global investors, any sign of de-escalation in US-China tensions is often viewed positively. A successful summit could reduce uncertainty and support economic stability, particularly in sectors sensitive to trade policy such as semiconductors, agriculture, and manufacturing. What This Means for Readers This development is important for anyone following international trade, geopolitical risk, or global financial markets. The outcome of a potential Trump-Xi meeting could influence tariffs, supply chains, and investment flows that directly affect businesses and consumers worldwide. Readers should watch for official responses from Beijing and any announcements regarding preparatory meetings between senior officials. Conclusion President Trump’s invitation to President Xi for a September 24 White House visit represents a notable diplomatic overture. Whether the meeting materializes and what it yields remains uncertain, but it underscores the ongoing importance of US-China dialogue in shaping global economic and political dynamics. Further updates will follow as both governments respond. FAQs Q1: Has China accepted the invitation? As of now, there has been no official confirmation from Beijing. The invitation is a unilateral announcement by President Trump, and discussions are likely ongoing. Q2: Why is a Trump-Xi meeting significant? Direct talks between the US and Chinese leaders can address major bilateral issues such as trade, technology, and security, potentially reducing tensions and fostering cooperation. Q3: Could the date change? Yes, high-level diplomatic visits are often subject to scheduling adjustments. The September 24 date may be confirmed or revised based on mutual agreement. This post Trump Extends White House Invitation to Chinese President Xi Jinping for September 24 first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

14 May 2026, 11:20

Bessent: Trump Told Xi He Wants to Open Up China, Signaling Shift in Trade Strategy

BitcoinWorld Bessent: Trump Told Xi He Wants to Open Up China, Signaling Shift in Trade Strategy United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has disclosed that President Donald Trump directly communicated to Chinese President Xi Jinping his desire to open up China economically, marking a notable rhetorical shift in the administration’s trade posture. The remarks, delivered during a recent economic forum, provide a rare glimpse into high-level diplomatic exchanges between the world’s two largest economies. Context of the Statement Bessent’s comments come amid ongoing tensions over tariffs, technology restrictions, and market access. The Treasury Secretary framed Trump’s message as an effort to rebalance the bilateral economic relationship rather than escalate confrontation. “The President told President Xi that he wants to open up China, not isolate it,” Bessent said, according to attendees. The statement suggests a nuanced approach that seeks greater access for American businesses while maintaining pressure on issues like intellectual property and state subsidies. Implications for Trade Policy The revelation adds a layer of complexity to the administration’s trade strategy. While Trump has imposed tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars in Chinese goods, the reported private message indicates a willingness to negotiate market liberalization. Analysts view this as a potential precursor to a broader deal that could lower barriers for US financial services, agriculture, and technology firms. However, critics argue that without concrete commitments from Beijing, such statements risk being perceived as diplomatic overtures without structural change. Market and Diplomatic Reactions Financial markets responded cautiously, with the S&P 500 and Shanghai Composite both showing modest gains following Bessent’s remarks. Chinese state media did not immediately confirm the exchange, but trade experts note that Xi has previously expressed interest in incremental reforms. The timing is critical: the US faces renewed pressure to address a trade deficit that exceeded $300 billion in 2025, while China seeks to stabilize its slowing economy amid a property sector crisis. What This Means for Readers For investors and businesses, Bessent’s disclosure signals that the US administration is exploring a dual-track approach: maintaining public tariff pressure while privately advocating for structural openings. This could create opportunities in sectors like finance, energy, and agriculture if negotiations advance. However, the lack of a formal framework means volatility remains high. Consumers may see limited short-term impact, but a successful opening could eventually lower prices on imported goods and expand market access for US exporters. Conclusion Bessent’s revelation underscores the intricate dance between public posturing and private diplomacy in US-China relations. While the promise to “open up China” aligns with long-standing American demands, its realization depends on Beijing’s willingness to enact verifiable reforms. For now, the statement adds a layer of diplomatic nuance that could either pave the way for a new trade framework or remain a rhetorical footnote if concrete steps do not follow. FAQs Q1: Did Trump directly tell Xi he wants to open up China? Yes, according to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Trump conveyed this message during direct communications with President Xi Jinping. The exact timing and context of the conversation were not specified. Q2: What does ‘open up China’ mean in this context? It refers to reducing trade barriers, increasing market access for foreign companies, and implementing structural reforms in areas like intellectual property, state-owned enterprises, and financial services. Q3: How does this affect current tariffs on Chinese goods? The statement does not directly change tariff policy. It suggests a potential shift toward negotiation, but tariffs remain in place unless a formal agreement is reached and implemented. This post Bessent: Trump Told Xi He Wants to Open Up China, Signaling Shift in Trade Strategy first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

14 May 2026, 11:15

FTX victims sue law firm Fenwick & West for $525M over alleged fraud concealment

BitcoinWorld FTX victims sue law firm Fenwick & West for $525M over alleged fraud concealment A group of 20 former FTX customers has filed a $525 million lawsuit against Fenwick & West, the law firm that provided legal counsel to the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange. The plaintiffs allege that the firm did not merely represent FTX but actively participated in concealing the fraud that led to the loss of billions in customer funds. The case, reported by Cointelegraph, centers on claims that Fenwick & West helped build the legal and corporate infrastructure that enabled the misuse of client assets. Nishad Singh’s testimony and the warning that went unheeded The lawsuit draws heavily on testimony from Nishad Singh, FTX’s former Director of Engineering. According to court documents, Singh informed Fenwick lawyers about the misuse of customer funds. Rather than reporting the matter to regulators or taking corrective action, the plaintiffs argue that the law firm advised on methods to conceal the activity. This allegation, if proven, would represent a significant breach of legal ethics and professional responsibility. Singh’s cooperation with prosecutors has already been a key element in the criminal case against FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried. Allegations of shell companies and deeper involvement The complaint goes further, alleging that Fenwick & West had deep involvement in the FTX Group’s operations beyond standard legal counsel. The plaintiffs claim the firm assisted in establishing shell companies and complex corporate structures designed to obscure the flow of funds between Alameda Research and FTX. These structures, the lawsuit asserts, were not merely negligent but were deliberately crafted to hide fraudulent transactions from auditors, regulators, and the public. The $525 million figure represents the estimated losses incurred by the 20 plaintiffs, though the total amount of customer funds lost in the FTX collapse is estimated to be in the billions. Broader implications for the legal profession This case raises serious questions about the liability of professional service firms in the cryptocurrency sector. If successful, it could set a precedent holding law firms accountable for the actions of their clients, particularly when they are alleged to have been active participants in the misconduct. The legal community is watching closely, as the outcome could reshape the boundaries of attorney-client privilege and the duty of lawyers to report financial crimes. The lawsuit also underscores the growing scrutiny of the role that lawyers, accountants, and consultants played in the FTX saga. Conclusion The lawsuit against Fenwick & West adds a new dimension to the ongoing legal fallout from the FTX collapse. While the exchange’s former executives face criminal charges, this civil action targets the professional enablers who are alleged to have facilitated the fraud. The case is in its early stages, and Fenwick & West has not yet filed a formal response. The outcome will likely have lasting implications for the standards of legal practice in the cryptocurrency industry and beyond. FAQs Q1: What is the basis of the $525 million lawsuit against Fenwick & West? The lawsuit alleges that Fenwick & West, as FTX’s law firm, not only failed to report fraud but actively helped conceal it. The plaintiffs cite testimony from former FTX engineer Nishad Singh, who claims he informed the firm about the misuse of customer funds. Q2: Who are the plaintiffs in this case? The plaintiffs are a group of 20 former FTX customers who lost funds in the exchange’s collapse. They are seeking $525 million in damages for the losses they incurred. Q3: What role did Fenwick & West allegedly play in the FTX fraud? According to the lawsuit, Fenwick & West helped establish shell companies and corporate structures that were used to hide the flow of funds between FTX and Alameda Research. The plaintiffs claim the firm’s involvement went beyond standard legal advice. This post FTX victims sue law firm Fenwick & West for $525M over alleged fraud concealment first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

14 May 2026, 11:02

Massive Win for Ripple and XRP Hidden In the CLARITY Act

Crypto investor Pumpius has highlighted a section of the proposed Clarity Act that he believes could significantly strengthen legal protections for blockchain developers and companies connected to the digital asset industry, including Ripple and XRP. In a tweet, Pumpius argued that Section 604 of the bill, titled the “Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act,” contains language that could reshape how open-source blockchain software developers are treated under U.S. law. The post focused on provisions of the lengthy legislation that address whether developers and infrastructure providers should be classified as money transmitters. According to Pumpius, the bill delivers what he described as the clearest legal protections yet for blockchain developers who do not take custody of user funds. MASSIVE WIN FOR RIPPLE XRP HIDDEN IN THE CLARITY ACT! Buried on page 230 of the 309-page bill is pure rocket fuel: Section 604 – The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act If you build open-source blockchain software and don’t control users’ funds… You are NOT a money… pic.twitter.com/Uj1bjO1VXl — Pumpius (@pumpius) May 12, 2026 Section 604 Could Protect Blockchain Developers Pumpius emphasized that Section 604 appears to create a legal distinction between developers who control customer assets and those who merely create or maintain blockchain software and infrastructure. The attached images from the legislation show language defining a “non-controlling developer or provider” as an entity that does not have the legal right or unilateral ability to control or execute transactions involving user assets. The bill further states that these non-controlling developers or providers should not be treated as money transmitting businesses under federal law. It also specifies that they should not face registration requirements simply for publishing software, maintaining distributed ledger systems, supporting infrastructure, or offering self-custody tools. In his post, Pumpius argued that the language directly addresses concerns that have existed within the cryptocurrency sector for years. He stated that many software developers feared that simply publishing blockchain-related code or running network infrastructure could expose them to regulatory penalties or criminal liability. According to Pumpius, the proposed legislation removes much of that uncertainty. Ripple and XRP Mentioned as Potential Beneficiaries Pumpius linked the legislation directly to Ripple and XRP , describing the proposal as a major victory for the ecosystem. While the bill does not specifically mention Ripple or XRP in the sections shown, he argued that clearer protections for blockchain infrastructure providers could benefit companies operating within the digital asset sector. His comments arrive at a time when regulatory clarity remains one of the most closely watched issues in the cryptocurrency industry. Ripple has spent years dealing with legal and regulatory scrutiny in the United States, and supporters of XRP have frequently argued that clearer legislation could accelerate adoption and institutional participation. The screenshots attached to the post also show that the legislation excludes developers from money transmission treatment when they are merely creating software, providing maintenance services for distributed ledgers, offering self-custody technology, or supplying infrastructure support for blockchain networks. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Senate Banking Committee Markup Approaches Pumpius also pointed followers to the upcoming Senate Banking Committee markup scheduled for Thursday, presenting the event as an important moment for the future of digital asset regulation in the United States. He encouraged readers to review the legislation themselves and share awareness of the proposal. The Clarity Act has become an important topic among cryptocurrency supporters because many in the industry believe the legislation could establish boundaries between software development, blockchain infrastructure activity, and regulated financial services. For XRP supporters, the sections highlighted by Pumpius are viewed as a sign that U.S. lawmakers may be moving toward a more defined regulatory structure for blockchain technology and digital assets. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Massive Win for Ripple and XRP Hidden In the CLARITY Act appeared first on Times Tabloid .

14 May 2026, 10:39

Belarus cryptobanks prepare to support Bitcoin, Toncoin, Tether, and 23 other coins

Belarusian cryptobanks will be allowed to process transactions with 26 leading cryptocurrencies preapproved by financial authorities in Minsk. The initial list, which has just been published, features the coins with the largest market cap, major stablecoins and some of the most popular altcoins. Belarus approves digital assets for crypto banks “Cryptobanks,” a Belarusian invention combining the functions of a traditional bank with those of a cryptocurrency exchange, will be permitted to operate with more than two dozen “digital tokens.” That’s according to a document released by the Belarus Hi-Tech Park ( HTP ), the country’s hub for software business which also offers preferential treatment to companies in the crypto space. A total of 26 digital currencies has been greenlighted with the regulation recently adopted by the Supervisory Board of the IT cluster, one of the largest in Central and Eastern Europe. These include the biggest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), Ripple’s XRP and Binance’s BNB, local media unveiled. Fiat-pegged stablecoins like Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, widely used by crypto investors and traders around the world, have been added as well. Some of the most popular meme coins, of the likes of Dogecoin (DOGE) and Shiba Inu (SHIB), are also among those chosen by the financial authorities in Minsk. Toncoin (TON), the price of which saw a significant increase since the announcement that Telegram is replacing the TON Foundation as the largest validator of its network, is on the list, too. The latter appears after earlier the Deputy Chairman of the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus (NBRB), Alexander Egorov, revealed the draft features 25 cryptocurrencies, Office Life remarked in a report on Wednesday. However, he made it clear the list was not final, emphasizing the monetary authority intends to expand or shorten it, depending on the volatility and capitalization of the assets on it. The deputy governor pointed out that new coins emerge almost daily, often quickly building market share. If the regulator finds that a token attracts significant investor attention and is backed by real assets, it may add it. It’s worth noting that some of the top 20 cryptos by market cap have been omitted. Among them, Zcash (ZEC), Monero (XMR), Canton (CC), and Stellar (XLM). Belarus to develop crypto banking services The list with the approved cryptocurrencies comes out after President Alexander Lukashenko authorized the establishment of institutions that will be able to process both fiat and crypto transactions. The Belarusian leader did that by signing Decree No. 19 “On Cryptobanks and Certain Issues of Control in the Sphere of Digital Tokens” in January. The document is meant to strengthen Belarus’s status as a regional leader in the field of information and financial technologies. It also lays the legal ground for the launch and operation of platforms focused on providing crypto banking services, as reported by Cryptopolitan. Under the new regulatory act, the NBRB and the Supervisory Board of the HTP will oversee this sector of the republic’s financial market. To be licensed as cryptobanks, applying entities must be residents of the High-Tech Park and added to a special register maintained by the central bank. The HTP, which is often called the Belarusian Silicon Valley, offers a special legal and tax regime for companies operating out of the hub. These benefits were extended to crypto firms with another presidential decree, No. 8 “On the Development of the Digital Economy,” which was signed in 2017 and entered into force in 2018. That document legalized cryptocurrencies, recognizing them as “digital tokens,” including those issued as part of initial coin offerings (ICOs). It also regulated crypto-related activities such as mining and trading, making Belarus the first among nations in the post-Soviet space to open towards decentralized virtual assets. The latest set of rules will allow cryptobanks to work with tokens created and placed by HTP-registered crypto firms as part of ICOs. The regulation will also permit them to carry out almost a dozen specific transactions with digital currencies, including depositing, transferring, borrowing, and staking as well as providing custodial services and helping clients issue their own tokens. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .