hodler

29 May 2026, 14:42

Dexsport vs Cloudbet vs Stake for Crypto Sports Betting in 2026

Crypto sports betting has matured far beyond niche Bitcoin casinos. In 2026, the market is split between three dominant models: privacy-first Web3 sportsbooks, veteran crypto betting operators, and entertainment-heavy casino ecosystems with sportsbook integration. Dexsport, Cloudbet, and Stake represent these three approaches better than almost anyone else in the industry. Cloudbet focuses on sportsbook depth and long-term operational stability. Stake dominates through brand scale, casino traffic, and aggressive VIP systems. Dexsport targets bettors who want blockchain-native betting without mandatory identity verification, while still maintaining licensing and public transparency. The differences matter because crypto betting in 2026 is no longer just about “accepting Bitcoin.” Bettors now compare: KYC enforcement, withdrawal speed, sportsbook quality, live betting tools, crypto network support, bonus usability, and transparency around settlements. This guide breaks down where each platform excels, where each one falls short, and which sportsbook fits different betting styles. Dexsport vs Cloudbet vs Stake Feature Dexsport Cloudbet Stake Core Focus Web3 sportsbook + privacy Veteran crypto sportsbook Massive crypto casino ecosystem KYC Policy No-KYC onboarding Conditional KYC KYC often required for withdrawals Supported Cryptos 38–40+ coins 30–40+ coins 20+ coins Sports Coverage Major sports + esports Extremely deep sportsbook Broad sportsbook + esports Live Betting Yes Yes Yes Cash Out Yes Yes Yes Public Bet Tracking Yes No No Audits CertiK + Pessimistic Traditional security stack Internal systems + licensing Welcome Bonus 480% + free spins Rakeback-style rewards Match bonuses + VIP Best For Privacy-focused bettors Serious sportsbook users High-volume entertainment bettors Dexsport: Best for Privacy and Web3 Betting Dexsport built its identity around low-friction crypto betting. The platform allows users to register via email, Telegram, MetaMask, Trust Wallet, or WalletConnect without mandatory identity verification during onboarding. Unlike many “anonymous” sportsbooks that later enforce verification at withdrawal, Dexsport markets itself around a crypto-native infrastructure from the beginning. The platform also combines sportsbook betting with a casino library exceeding 10,000 games. Dexsport includes public on-chain style bet tracking and a live betting desk where wagers can be viewed in real time. The platform also completed audits through CertiK and Pessimistic. Strengths Full crypto-native onboarding WalletConnect and Telegram registration Transparent public betting desk Strong bonus structure 38–40+ supported cryptocurrencies Weekly cashback and Sports Club rewards Weaknesses Smaller global brand recognition than Stake Sportsbook depth is narrower than Cloudbet for niche markets Best For Dexsport works best for bettors who prioritize: privacy, fast onboarding, multi-chain payments, and reduced friction between deposits and wagering. It is especially attractive for bettors outside tightly regulated regions who want sportsbook access without traditional banking systems. Cloudbet: Best for Serious Sports Bettors Cloudbet is one of the oldest crypto sportsbooks still operating at scale. Founded in 2013, it built its reputation around sportsbook functionality rather than casino marketing hype. That longevity matters in crypto gambling, where many operators disappear within a few years. Cloudbet’s sportsbook remains one of the deepest in the crypto sector. It covers dozens of sports, major esports titles, advanced betting markets, high betting limits, and extensive live betting functionality. The platform strongly targets experienced bettors rather than casual casino users. Its reward structure reflects that philosophy. Instead of oversized deposit multipliers, Cloudbet focuses on: rakeback, activity rewards, loyalty incentives, and long-term bettor retention. Reviews consistently highlight Cloudbet’s fast automated withdrawals and strong operational reliability. Strengths Long operational history since 2013 High betting limits Deep sportsbook markets Excellent esports coverage Strong live betting infrastructure Fast crypto withdrawals Weaknesses Less aggressive welcome bonuses Interface feels more functional than entertaining Conditional KYC for higher-volume accounts Fewer “community” or social betting elements Best For Cloudbet is ideal for: serious sports bettors, high-volume players, live betting specialists, and users who care more about sportsbook quality than casino gamification. If your primary activity is sports betting rather than slots or casino play, Cloudbet remains one of the strongest pure sportsbook options in crypto gambling. Stake: Best for Scale, Entertainment, and VIP Rewards Stake became the biggest recognizable brand in crypto gambling through aggressive expansion, sponsorships, creator partnerships, and a casino-heavy ecosystem. The sportsbook itself is strong. Stake covers 40+ sports, 1,000+ leagues, esports, racing, live betting, and same-game combinations. Its interface is among the smoothest in the industry, especially for mobile users. Where Stake dominates is ecosystem scale: massive liquidity, extremely active VIP systems, constant promotions, and integrated casino traffic. The downside is that Stake operates more like a centralized entertainment platform than a privacy-focused Web3 sportsbook. KYC requests remain common for withdrawals or account reviews. Multiple reviews note that verification can happen at any stage depending on account activity. Strengths Huge sportsbook and casino ecosystem Excellent live betting UI Strong esports coverage Large VIP and rakeback programs High liquidity and fast settlements Well-developed mobile experience Weaknesses KYC can be enforced unpredictably Promotions often carry heavier wagering requirements Less focused on transparency or provable structures Privacy is weaker than Dexsport Best For Stake is best suited for: high-frequency users, casino-first bettors, esports bettors, and users who value ecosystem scale over anonymity. It also works well for players who enjoy ongoing VIP engagement and promotional campaigns. Which Platform Has the Best Bonuses? Dexsport Dexsport offers one of the largest headline packages: 480% across first deposits, free bets, cashback, and 300 free spins. Cloudbet Cloudbet focuses more on sustainable sportsbook rewards: rakeback, reloads, cashback, and activity-based bonuses. Stake Stake’s value comes mostly through: VIP progression, rakeback, recurring promos, and ecosystem rewards. Final Verdict All three sportsbooks occupy different parts of the crypto betting market in 2026. Choose Dexsport if you want: no-KYC onboarding, wallet-native betting, transparent wagering systems, and reduced friction. Choose Cloudbet if you want: the deepest sportsbook, high betting limits, and a long-established crypto betting operator. Choose Stake if you want: the biggest ecosystem, strong esports coverage, and constant VIP-style engagement. For pure sportsbook functionality, Cloudbet still leads. For entertainment scale and liquidity, Stake remains dominant. For privacy-focused crypto betting combined with licensing, audits, and transparent betting infrastructure, Dexsport currently offers one of the most balanced Web3 sportsbook experiences available in 2026. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

29 May 2026, 14:30

Ripple Makes New Demands From SEC, What Are They Asking For?

Crypto firm Ripple has sent a letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) demanding clarity on the treatment of payment stablecoins and tokenized securities. This follows a meeting that the firm held with the Commission’s Crypto Task Force a couple of months ago. Ripple Requests SEC To Provide Clarity On Stablecoins and Tokenized Securities In a letter addressed to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, Ripple requested clarity on stablecoins and tokenized deposits and offered suggestions on how the Commission could proceed. Firstly, the crypto firm cited the need for clarity on the treatment of stablecoins as collateral and suggested that the Commission amend Rule 15c3-1 to clarify how stablecoins can be properly applied on balance sheets. Furthermore, Ripple demanded clarity on the requirements for custodying clients’ stablecoins and suggested that the SEC amend Rule 15c3-3 to define the category of “Qualified Payment Stablecoins.” The firm also asked the Crypto Task Force to clarify that crypto asset non-securities, aside from Bitcoin and Ethereum, can receive equivalent treatment. Ripple alluded to the SEC’s recent guidance , which classified other major cryptos as commodities alongside BTC and ETH. To achieve this, Ripple suggested that the SEC revise Question 4 in the FAQ relating to crypto asset activities to account for any non-securities that meet the readily marketable definition. The firm further asked the Commission to provide an analysis that illustrates how a 2% haircut for stablecoins remains punitive. They suggested that stablecoins should have 0% haircut, provided there is a mint-burn relationship between the broker-dealer and issuer. Lastly, Ripple asked the SEC Crypto Task Force to clarify which registry of ownership, whether off-chain or on-chain, takes precedence to determine ownership and legally enforceable rights. The firm urged the Task Force to designate the on-chain registry as the single authoritative legal register, thereby eliminating the dual-registry ambiguity that arises in digital twin structures. Ripple mentioned in the letter that the response was a follow-up to their March 20 meeting with the SEC Crypto Task Force. The firm further revealed that they had discussed the treatment of payment stablecoins and tokenized securities under the net capital and consumer protection rules, as well as potential next steps toward broader guidance. Ripple CEO Says Anti-Crypto Army Has Been Defeated In an X post , Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said that the anti-crypto army was defeated by the courts, the voters, and U.S. President Donald Trump . He noted how the crypto witch hunt never made “policy, legal, or political sense.” He added that combating financial innovation only helped protect those who wanted to keep the old, often broken, system in place. Garlinghouse was reacting to a post by President Trump in which he called out former SEC Chair Gary Gensler and the anti-crypto army for nearly destroying the American crypto industry. The president also vowed that his administration will codify the CLARITY Act , which cannot be undone by the “crypto haters.”

29 May 2026, 14:26

How FinchTrade Is Quietly Reshaping Institutional Crypto-Fiat Settlement for Emerging Markets

Institutional crypto in 2026 is usually described in terms of capital markets: prime brokers onboarding hedge funds, custodians expanding their books, trading desks reporting record volumes. That activity is real, but it sits alongside a second, less visible shift that is now growing faster – the adoption of stablecoins as operational settlement infrastructure by the businesses that move money for a living. At FinchTrade , a Swiss-licensed OTC desk serving payment service providers, EMIs, and exchanges across emerging markets, that shift is visible directly in client volumes. Treasury teams, EMIs, and exchange operators around the world (São Paulo, Dubai, Singapore, Lagos, and others) are running operational crypto exposure at a scale that rarely reaches mainstream coverage. To understand why, it helps to start with what these businesses are actually using stablecoins for. What "Institutional" means today In crypto markets, "institutional" has historically meant hedge funds and family offices allocating to crypto as an asset class. The growth accelerating in 2026 is different in kind: it is payment infrastructure adopting crypto as operational rails. A Nigerian processor is not allocating to crypto; it is using crypto to move money. A Brazilian B2B company is not speculating on stablecoins; it is settling supplier invoices through them. The two kinds of institutions require fundamentally different infrastructure. Asset-management flow needs deep liquidity and prime brokerage relationships. Payment-infrastructure flow needs reliable settlement, capital-efficient collateral, regional banking partnerships, and local-currency support across non-major pairs: naira, real, peso, dirham, rupiah, not only EUR and USD. The providers built for one market are rarely the providers built for the other, and it is the second market that is expanding fastest. The scale of stablecoin payment growth That expansion is now substantial. Stablecoin payment volume reached an estimated $390 billion on an annualised basis in 2025, and business-to-business payments were the fastest-growing component within it, expanding several times over year-on-year. Stablecoins are no longer principally a trading or speculative asset on institutional balance sheets; they have become a settlement medium that reduces cross-border transaction costs . The growth is concentrated in emerging-market corridors: intra-APAC treasury flows, Latin American processors settling supplier payments in USDC, Middle Eastern and African exchanges providing crypto-fiat conversion at volumes that did not exist some time ago. These are precisely the corridors where the traditional banking alternative performs worst. Why payment businesses need a different infrastructure Consider a Brazilian payment processor running cross-border B2B flows. Clients deposit reais, the processor converts to USDC, the USDC moves to a counterpart processor in the destination country, converts to local currency, and funds arrive in the recipient's account. Transit time: hours. Cost: fractions of a percent. The same flow through correspondent banking takes two to five business days, costs three to seven percent in cumulative fees, and carries FX risk throughout. For a processor running tens of millions monthly, that is a treasury-level decision rather than a technology experiment. Capturing that efficiency in full, however, depends on the OTC desk a business settles through. The conventional institutional model requires full pre-funding before execution and works against a payment processor whose business depends on capital efficiency. FinchTrade, an OTC desk built for payment businesses, removes that constraint. Its defining feature is margin-based settlement: the client posts a fraction of its trading limit rather than the full amount, trades clear in under an hour, and working capital stays in the client's own accounts rather than frozen on a counterparty's balance sheet. This is the model that lets a payment business scale its volume without scaling the capital it has to leave idle. Why settlement time matters Speed is the other problem. For asset managers, T+1 settlement is acceptable; the capital is illiquid by design. For payment businesses , settlement time is the product. A processor routing merchant payouts cannot wait six hours when the underlying transaction settles same-day. An EMI managing float across time zones needs settlement completed before the destination bank closes. A desk settling in approximately 30 minutes, around the clock, including weekends, removes the reconciliation overhead and FX exposure that accumulate when settlement is delayed. The regulatory landscape is maturing Capital efficiency and speed explain the demand. In turn, regulation determines where that demand can be served. Frameworks in several jurisdictions have matured into clear operational paths for institutional crypto-fiat infrastructure: the UAE's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority, Singapore's MAS Payment Services Act, and Switzerland's VASP regime – the framework FinchTrade operates under, administered through VQF – each give payment businesses documented requirements they can build against. When a Mexican processor or a Filipino exchange selects where to anchor its crypto operations, it is choosing the framework that best satisfies its compliance obligations while serving its actual market. What this means for buyers – and where FinchTrade fits This is the lens through which a treasury lead actually evaluates providers, and it bears little resemblance to a prime-broker selection checklist. The questions are operational: can the desk settle in under an hour? Does it support the regional fiat pairs we require? Can its compliance documentation satisfy our local regulator? FinchTrade is built around those questions. Swiss VASP regulation provides the regulatory foundation. Banking partnerships across European, African, and Latin American rails handle the fiat side. The firm is developing dedicated cross-border corridor infrastructure for flows between Europe and Africa, LATAM, and the UAE, designed to settle in naira, cedi, peso, real, dirham, and other currencies that legacy correspondents handle slowly and at high cost. As business-to-business stablecoin settlement scales toward the trillion-dollar mark in the coming years, the infrastructure supporting it will increasingly come from providers built specifically for that purpose. FinchTrade's position is straightforward: the right provider is defined by operational fit – regulation, settlement, and currency coverage – not by market profile. That is the standard FinchTrade has built toward, and the direction in which the next phase of institutional crypto-fiat settlement is expected to head. Disclaimer: This is a sponsored article and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Crypto Daily, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

29 May 2026, 13:20

Are SoFi Technologies bulls here? 2 factors say near-term looks bullish

More on Sofi SoFi Is Down 50% - I'm Buying More SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) Presents at J.P. Morgan 54th Annual Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference Transcript SoFi: Lackluster Fundamentals And Tough Valuations Vs Oversold Stock SoFi's bank-issued US dollar stablecoin available to trade on app The surge in Treasury yields puts these stocks in the spotlight

29 May 2026, 12:10

France sets June 30 MiCA deadline for all crypto platforms

🚨 French regulators set June 30 as the last date for $BTC platforms to get a MiCA license or leave the market. Operating without a MiCA license means blacklisting and legal action will follow. 🛑 Key point: Only licensed crypto companies can serve customers in France after July 1. Continue Reading: France sets June 30 MiCA deadline for all crypto platforms The post France sets June 30 MiCA deadline for all crypto platforms appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

29 May 2026, 12:00

BlackRock and JPMorgan File Tokenised Treasury Funds for Stablecoin

J.P. Morgan Asset Management launched a tokenised Treasury fund on Ethereum on 13 May 2026, investing $100 million at launch. BlackRock separately filed to add blockchain-based records to its $7 billion Treasury fund using BNY Mellon infrastructure.