hodler

28 May 2026, 09:43

XRP Price Falls Below $1.30, But Expert Says Something “Is Happening, The SEC is Doing it”

XRP price is falling, with more than 3% drop in a day as it is trading at $1.29. The $1.30 support zone, long treated as the floor of this corrective cycle, has cracked under sustained selling pressure. But at least one analyst thinks the real story isn’t on the XRP chart at all, it’s in Washington. Finance expert Levi Rietveld went viral this week after posting on X: “I TOLD YOU XRP FAM!!!! ITS HAPPENING!!!! THE SEC IS DOING IT!!!,” attaching a video in which he argued the Federal Reserve is preparing to inject an initial $7 billion into the economy next week as the opening move of a quantitative easing cycle. I TOLD YOU $XRP FAM!!!! ITS HAPPENING!!!! THE SEC IS DOING IT!!! pic.twitter.com/Pe8dwhUo4o — Levi | Crypto Crusaders (@LeviRietveld) May 26, 2026 Rietveld contends that coordinated liquidity expansion across the U.S., China, and Europe would dramatically expand global M2 money supply, pushing capital into risk assets, including crypto. When more dollars circulate, investors chase yield further out on the risk curve. Whether or not the Fed delivers, XRP’s price structure has deteriorated meaningfully over the past 48 hours. Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio Can XRP Price Reclaim $1.35? The 89% bearish sentiment reading, paired with an Extreme Fear score of 25 on the Fear & Greed Index, captures the mood precisely. XRP has shed 10% over the last 2 weeks and sits a long way from its $3.65 peak. Trading volume has jumped to above $2 billion, but mostly coming from sellers dumping the coin. Technically, XRP has broken down from a triangle/pennant formation, lost the $1.35 pivot, and is now falling from the $1.30–$1.32 demand zone that previously launched a strong upside impulse. The 50-day moving average is declining, and the price is printing lower lows in a classic bearish market structure. Xrp (XRP) 24h 7d 30d 1y All time $1.30 is the neckline of a head-and-shoulders pattern, a close below that level could trigger an 18% measured move toward the $1.12–$1.20 area, and it’s now happening. If today closes below $1.30, this would likely confirm a prolonged breakdown, opening downside targets at $1.20 and potentially $1.10 if selling accelerates. Discover: The Best Token Presales Bitcoin Hyper Attracts Rotation Capital Watching a position bleed 10% in a month has a way of clarifying priorities. For traders reassessing exposure at current XRP levels, where upside to meaningful resistance at $1.60 is roughly 20% and downside risk to $1.10 is just as wide, the risk-reward calculus looks uncomfortably symmetrical. That’s the moment early-stage infrastructure players start attracting attention. As XRP struggles to recover, capital is visibly rotating into higher-beta opportunities. Bitcoin Hyper ($HY PER) is one presale drawing that flows. It positions itself as the first-ever Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, delivering sub-second finality and low-cost smart contract execution on top of Bitcoin’s security layer, targeting performance metrics that exceed Solana. The presale has raised $32 million at a current token price of $0.0136 , with a huge 36% APY staking rewards active for early participants. The Decentralized Canonical Bridge enables native BTC transfers into the ecosystem without wrapped-token counterparty risk. Research Bitcoin Hyper before the current presale stage closes. The post XRP Price Falls Below $1.30, But Expert Says Something “Is Happening, The SEC is Doing it” appeared first on Cryptonews .

28 May 2026, 08:31

Trump vows to ‘never let crypto down’ as market loses $1 trillion since he took office

Shortly before the Department of Defense – or War – delivered the latest blow to the price of Bitcoin ( BTC ) and the total valuation of cryptocurrencies by exchanging fire with Iran , President Donald Trump published a lengthy Truth Social post pledging his support for digital assets. Bitcoin price one-week chart. Source: Finbold Specifically, the commander-in-chief began his message by accusing former SEC Chair Gary Gensler and an ‘Anti-Crypto Army’ of nearly destroying cryptocurrencies in the U.S. before declaring he ‘saved’ the industry. Additionally, President Trump shared that ‘Builders and Entrepreneurs are coming BACK to the United States where they belong,’ and declared that America is the ‘crypto capital of the world.’ Lastly, he also promised to fully codify favorable legislation that cannot be undone by subsequent administrations, before declaring: The new Frontier of Finance is being Built in America, and “TRUMP” will NEVER let Crypto down! President DONALD J. TRUMP Cryptocurrencies wipe $1 trillion since President Trump’s second inauguration Elsewhere, while cryptocurrencies have been an important narrative during the election campaign and a recurring theme during President Donald Trump’s second term, his actual track record has been patchy. To begin with, the overall digital assets market capitalization crashed by slightly more than $1 trillion from $3.45 trillion to $2.44 trillion between January 20, 2025 – the inauguration – and press time on May 28, 2026. Total cryptocurrencies market capitalization 5-year chart. Source: TradingView Bitcoin, the world’s premier cryptocurrency, is also ultimately down 28.53% from $102,573 to $73,307 within the same timeframe. Still, it must also be said that BTC reached its new all-time high (ATH) near $125,000 and that the total market capitalization of digital assets hit $4.15 trillion during the billionaire’s first year back in office. Notably, the previous multi-year highs – at $68,742 and roughly $3 trillion, respectively – were reached in 2021, while both President Joe Biden and SEC Chair Gary Gensler were in office, and the most recent bull market – either ended or paused late in 2025 – likewise began during the previous administration . President Donald Trump ushers in an era of crypto-friendly regulators and legislature Examining the actual policy, President Donald Trump’s administration has been pushing for extensive and industry-friendly legislation, with the Senate Banking Committee passing the Clarity Act earlier in May, and with the SEC walking back on multiple investigations and actions targeting the sector . However, it is worth noting that the legal framework for cryptocurrencies in the U.S. is far from complete and has, in fact, seen multiple delays with the version unveiled early in 2026 leading to sharp disagreements among prominent voices in the space, such as Cardano’s ( ADA ) Charles Hoskinson, Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong, and Ripple’s Brad Garlinghouse. Additionally, despite the progress, President Trump has also been courting controversy regarding digital assets. President Trump shadowed by cryptocurrency controversy since inauguration The first sign of the arguably mixed disposition came already with the inauguration, as the presidential family launched a series of personality-linked meme coins – a poor investment by most measures other than for traders who purchased with the sole aim of owning a digital commemorative coin, and for the issuers themselves. Official Trump price all-time chart by late May 2026. Source: Finbold Possibly the bigger controversy came with the extensive proliferation – and the deep integration of the Trump family – with prediction markets, which, on the one hand, extensively rely on cryptocurrencies and, on the other, are widely seen as a form of gambling despite the platforms making attempts to draw a sharp distinction. Critics would argue that, between the rapidly depreciating meme coins and companies like Polymarket, President Donald Trump’s administration has done as much to harm the reputation of cryptocurrencies as amicable regulators and institutional adoption have done to help it. Featured image via Shutterstock The post Trump vows to ‘never let crypto down’ as market loses $1 trillion since he took office appeared first on Finbold .

28 May 2026, 08:28

Litecoin’s Payment Narrative: Can LTC Stay Relevant as Stablecoins Take Over?

Litecoin has long been pitched as “digital silver” for everyday spending—faster than Bitcoin, cheaper than credit cards, and simple to use. Yet a new reality is reshaping crypto payments: stablecoins, whose prices track fiat currencies, are grabbing most of the transactional spotlight. If stablecoins keep dominating checkouts and remittances, what room is left for LTC? This guide cuts through narratives to examine where Litecoin still adds value, where stablecoins clearly win, and how users and merchants can choose the right rail for each job. No hype here—just practical trade-offs, risk notes, and a framework you can apply today. Point Details Stablecoins lead for price certainty Dollar-pegged assets remove volatility at checkout, easing accounting and tax complexity for merchants and payers. Litecoin still excels on simplicity LTC offers low fees, reliable uptime, and straightforward on-chain UX—useful for crypto-native transfers and quick settlements. Privacy and censorship resistance differ LTC’s MWEB adds optional privacy; stablecoins can be frozen by issuers on some networks, which helps compliance but reduces neutrality. Network choice matters for stablecoins Fees and speed depend on the chain (e.g., Tron, Solana, Ethereum). Selecting the wrong network can increase costs. Bridges and custody introduce extra risk Wrapped LTC and cross-chain stablecoin moves add smart-contract or counterparty risk. Staying native reduces attack surface. How Litecoin became the cash of crypto Launched in 2011, Litecoin pursued a simple payment-first design: faster blocks (about 2.5 minutes), inexpensive transactions, and a widely supported, Bitcoin-like toolchain. Its Scrypt-based proof-of-work made consumer-grade mining feasible in early years, while today miners often benefit from merged mining with Dogecoin—supporting network security and miner revenue diversity. Litecoin’s appeal to payers and merchants has been practical rather than flashy: Predictably low on-chain fees relative to congested smart-contract chains. Wide wallet support across hardware, mobile, and desktop ecosystems. Reliable uptime and a conservative upgrade culture, limiting breaking changes. In 2022, the network activated MimbleWimble Extension Blocks (MWEB), offering optional confidentiality for amounts and improved fungibility within the extension block design. Adoption is opt-in and depends on wallet and exchange support, but it gave Litecoin a distinct privacy angle for users comfortable with the trade-offs. See the project’s overview for technical context at the official site: litecoin.org . Merchant acceptance of LTC has historically moved in cycles, typically flowing through payment gateways that add or remove assets based on demand and risk policy. Meanwhile, retail-facing fintechs periodically list LTC for buy/sell or pay-with-crypto features. Exact adoption counts vary by region and over time, but the pattern is consistent: when crypto spending ticks up, LTC rides the wave thanks to its reliability and existing integrations. Bottom line: Litecoin’s pitch has been low-friction, neutral, and fast enough for day-to-day crypto transfers—without the moving parts and central actors behind fiat-pegged coins. Stablecoins are winning checkout mindshare Over the past few years, dollar-pegged stablecoins have become the go-to medium for crypto payments and remittances. The reason is straightforward: price stability. A payer and a merchant can both denominate the invoice in dollars and settle in a dollar-pegged asset, avoiding intraday swings that complicate accounting or lead to slippage. Three structural shifts reinforced this trend: Network diversification: Stablecoins now circulate on multiple chains with very low fees and fast finality. Usage on low-cost networks has surged because the experience often feels instant and near-free for small transfers. Processor and platform support: Many gateways, exchanges, and wallets prioritize stablecoins, simplifying invoicing, settlement, and treasury management for merchants. Compliance tooling: Issuers can freeze assets at sanctioned addresses on some networks. While this is a drawback for censorship resistance, it makes compliance controls more flexible for regulated participants. As a result, everyday payments, B2B settlements, and cross-border payroll increasingly default to stablecoins. Even crypto-native users often use them as a “resting balance” between trades or transfers. That doesn’t make LTC obsolete, but it changes expectations. In stablecoin-first workflows, a volatile asset like Litecoin must justify its role—on price, speed, privacy, neutrality, or tooling. LTC vs stablecoins: what matters at the point of sale When a user pays an invoice or a business settles a bill, the decisive factors tend to be cost, certainty, and control. Here is a practical comparison you can apply to your own flows: Payment factor Litecoin (LTC) Stablecoins Price stability Volatile; amount can swing between quote and confirmation if markets move. Typically pegged to fiat (e.g., USD) for predictable invoicing and settlement. Fees and speed Low fees, fast blocks, predictable confirmations. Varies by chain: some networks are extremely cheap and fast; others can be costly during congestion. Compliance levers No issuer; hard to freeze funds at protocol level. Issuers can freeze assets on supported networks, aiding compliance but adding censorship risk. Privacy Base layer is transparent; MWEB offers optional confidentiality if supported by your tools. Transfer graphs vary by chain; stablecoins are typically straightforward to trace; no built-in confidentiality. Operational simplicity One native rail; minimal smart-contract risk; broad wallet support. Multiple chains and token contracts to choose from; picking the wrong network can cause failed deposits. Counterparty risk No issuer reserve risk; only protocol and wallet risks. Exposure to issuer reserves, blacklisting, and smart-contract risk on the chosen network. Pro tip: For volatile assets like LTC, reduce slippage by using quotes with short timers, or payment processors that auto-convert to fiat or stablecoins at receipt. Where Litecoin still makes sense Even in a stablecoin-heavy landscape, practical niches remain for LTC. Consider these situations: Crypto-native transfers where both sides hold LTC: If payer and recipient already use Litecoin, native settlement avoids FX into and out of stablecoins and reduces bridge or exchange fees. Low-friction P2P and tipping: When UX demands a simple, consistent address format and widely supported wallets, LTC delivers with minimal overhead. Optional privacy via MWEB: For users who have MWEB-capable wallets and understand the compliance considerations, the extension block can add confidentiality that most stablecoin rails do not provide. Minimized third-party dependence: LTC’s neutrality (no issuer) removes reserve and blacklisting risk. For some treasuries, avoiding a centralized issuer is a feature. Exchange-to-exchange rebalancing: When both venues offer efficient LTC deposits/withdrawals, transfers can be cheaper or faster than moving stablecoins on busier networks. Litecoin doesn’t have to beat stablecoins at everything to be useful—it just needs to be the right tool for specific jobs where neutrality, simplicity, or optional privacy are priorities. A practical playbook for users and merchants For payers deciding between LTC and stablecoins Check invoice currency and time limits: If the bill is in USD and must settle within minutes, stablecoins usually reduce slippage risk. If it’s crypto-denominated or the recipient prefers LTC, native LTC can be cleaner. Match the network to the recipient: For stablecoins, confirm the exact chain and token contract your counterparty accepts before sending. With LTC, confirm whether the recipient supports MWEB if you intend to use it. Estimate all-in cost: Include on-chain fees, spreads for buying/selling, and any processor charges. The “cheapest” rail changes once exchange costs are added. Consider custody and policy: If your treasury policy avoids centralized issuer exposure, LTC may align better. If your policy prioritizes dollar stability, stablecoins may be preferred. Document the transfer: Save the transaction ID and invoice or quote. For MWEB, ensure your wallet can export necessary proofs if your auditor or compliance team requests them. For merchants and freelancers Offer both when possible: Supporting one stablecoin network plus LTC captures most demand without complex overhead. Automate conversion and risk limits: If you accept LTC, consider automatic conversion thresholds so only a portion remains as LTC exposure. Standardize network choices: Pick a stablecoin chain with consistently low fees and set it as default. Make the network explicit on invoices and payment pages. Clarify refund rules: Define how you handle refunds across assets and networks to avoid disputes (e.g., refund in the original asset and chain, minus fees). Train support teams: Most payment issues stem from wrong networks or token contracts. Provide a plain-english guide and screenshots for customers. Pro tip: If you rely on MWEB for sensitive payments, vet your accounting flow in advance. Not all exchanges treat MWEB deposits the same, and some may not support them. Risks and constraints to keep front of mind Litecoin-specific considerations Market volatility: Price can move during checkout. Use short-lived quotes or auto-conversion where possible. MWEB support variance: Not all wallets and exchanges support MWEB. If you use it, ensure your counterparties and back-office tools are compatible. Network effects: In periods when payment processors downplay non-stable assets, user demand for paying in LTC can ebb. Stablecoin-specific considerations Issuer and peg risk: Stablecoins depend on reserve quality and operational controls. Peg deviations have occurred historically during market stress. Blacklisting and freezes: Some issuers can freeze assets at specific addresses. This helps compliance but introduces censorship and counterparty risks. Chain selection risk: Sending stablecoins on the wrong network or to an incompatible deposit address is a common, costly error. Smart-contract risk: On programmable chains, bugs or malicious approvals can drain funds. Use trusted wallets and minimal permissions. Shared risks Custody security: Hardware wallets, multisig, and well-audited key management reduce theft risks across assets. Regulatory change: Rules for stablecoins and crypto payments continue to evolve. Monitor local guidance, especially for business invoicing and tax treatment. Scams and fake tokens: When dealing with stablecoins on smart-contract chains, verify contract addresses; with LTC, beware of address poisoning and impostor domains. What could keep LTC relevant in the next cycle Litecoin’s continued role in payments will rest on comparative advantages that stablecoins can’t easily replicate. Several avenues are worth watching: Privacy-optional flow with MWEB: If wallet and exchange support broadens, LTC could occupy a pragmatic middle ground—transparent by default, confidential when needed. Native, low-friction rails: LTC’s single-rail simplicity (no chain selection maze) can be a feature for mass-market wallets and tipping apps that want minimal user error. Developer tooling and L2 experiments: While Litecoin is not a smart-contract platform, improvements in payment channels, cross-chain swaps, or lightweight L2 utilities could sharpen its P2P edge over time. Merchant playbooks: If processors package “instant-quote + auto-convert” for LTC as cleanly as for stablecoins, volatility becomes less of a blocker without sacrificing neutrality. Regulatory divergence: In jurisdictions where fiat-pegged tokens face tighter constraints, neutral L1 assets may look comparatively simpler for small-value payments. It’s unlikely that a single asset “wins” payments. More realistic is a toolkit outcome: stablecoins for fiat-denominated certainty, LTC for neutral low-friction transfers and optional privacy, and other rails for programmable escrow or on-chain financing. In that multi-rail world, Litecoin can remain useful if it stays focused on reliability, wallet UX, and the features only it can credibly offer. For ongoing coverage and practical explainers on crypto payments and infrastructure, explore features at Crypto Daily . Frequently Asked Questions Does Litecoin actually have lower fees than stablecoins? It depends on the stablecoin’s network. Some stablecoin chains routinely offer very low fees, while others can spike with demand. Litecoin’s fees are generally low and predictable on the base layer. Your all-in cost should also factor in exchange spreads and processor fees. How can I avoid volatility when paying with LTC? Use payment quotes with short timers, or services that auto-convert incoming LTC to your chosen currency at receipt. For direct P2P, coordinate timing with the recipient and confirm the target amount after network confirmation. Is MWEB legal to use for business payments? Legality varies by jurisdiction and your compliance obligations. MWEB is opt-in and may not be supported by all exchanges or accounting tools. If you need to use it, consult local guidance and ensure you can retain adequate records for audits. Can stablecoin issuers freeze my funds? On some networks, major issuers have technical controls that allow freezing of specific addresses to comply with legal orders or sanctions. This can aid compliance for institutions, but it reduces censorship resistance compared to neutral assets like LTC. Which stablecoin network should a merchant pick by default? Choose one that your customers already use, with consistently low fees and strong wallet support. Publish the exact chain and token standard you accept to prevent mis-sends. Consider offering LTC alongside it to capture crypto-native demand. Is Litecoin supported by popular payment processors? Support has existed through various gateways over time and can change with demand and policy updates. Before advertising LTC acceptance, verify current support with your provider and test end-to-end settlement, including refunds. Is wrapped LTC on other chains a good idea for payments? Wrapped assets add bridge or custodian risk and can complicate support and refunds. For routine payments, native LTC is simpler. If you must use a wrapped version, ensure the bridge or custodian is reputable and that your counterparty can receive the exact token. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

28 May 2026, 08:22

Bet on the Champions League Final 2026: PSG vs Arsenal Through Traditional Books or Web3?

Budapest. Saturday evening. Two teams who took very different roads to get here. PSG are the defending champions, chasing a feat only Real Madrid has managed in the Champions League era: back‑to‑back titles . Arsenal are the nearly‑men who finally stopped being nearly. A first Premier League title in 22 years. A first Champions League final in 20 years. And a genuine shot at the double . The numbers say PSG are favorites. Opta's supercomputer gives them a 55.78% chance, Arsenal 44.22% . The betting markets echo that: PSG at -145 to lift the trophy, Arsenal at +210 . But here's what the models don't fully capture. Arsenal won the league last week. The monkey is off their back. As one analyst put it, "this final is now an opportunity rather than an obligation" . That makes them dangerous. Traditional Bookmakers vs Web3: Two Very Different Models Before placing a bet, there's a quieter decision to make: who you trust to handle your money. Traditional sportsbooks offer familiarity, massive liquidity, and regulation. But they also come with KYC — passport uploads, selfies, the occasional "we need additional verification" right after you win. During peak traffic, withdrawal delays aren't rare. Web3 betting platforms work differently. You connect a wallet instead of creating an account. Funds remain in your wallet until settlement — no middleman holding them. What to Look for in a Web3 Bookmaker Not all Web3 platforms are built the same. A few things actually matter: Real no‑KYC policies – some platforms advertise anonymity but quietly request verification at withdrawal. Read recent user experiences before depositing . Licensing & audits – licenses and audits aren't guarantees, but they signal the platform isn't a fly‑by‑night operation . Network choice – for live betting, speed matters. Ethereum gets congested and expensive. BNB Chain, Polygon, or TRC20 settle in minutes with negligible fees . Clean interface – you don't want to hunt for markets while the match is running. Three Betting Angles for the Final (Not Advice, Just Ideas) No one should tell you how to bet. But here's what analysts are watching. 1. Bukayo Saka Fouls Saka's duel with Nuno Mendes has history. Mendes draws fouls easily (1.7 per 90). Saka is physical in big games (1.4 fouls per 90). In their two Champions League meetings last season, Saka committed two fouls in both matches . Market: Over 1.5 fouls by Bukayo Saka. Odds around 11/10. 2. Gabriel from a Corner Arsenal have scored more set‑piece goals than anyone in the Premier League — 24, with 18 coming from corners . Gabriel is their primary aerial target. Declan Rice and Saka are the usual suppliers. Market: Gabriel to score anytime. The direct line is around 15/2, but the combo (Gabriel goal + Rice assist, or + Saka assist) sits at 25/1. 3. Both Teams to Score PSG have scored 44 goals in this Champions League campaign — the most ever in a single season . Arsenal's defense is elite (only six conceded), but they've kept clean sheets mostly against teams that didn't have Dembélé, Kvaratskhelia, and Doué running at them. Market: Both teams to score. Widely available around 1.8. Dexsport as a Crypto Option If after reading the comparison above you're leaning toward Web3, Dexsport is one example of how these platforms work in practice. It's been running since 2022 — long enough for its operational strengths and limitations to become visible. Both Teams to Score market for the UEFA Champions League Final. Source: Dexsport.io What that means for this final: Onboarding: Connect MetaMask or Trust Wallet. No passports. No selfies . Market depth: 100–200 markets on a match of this size — not just winner, but corners, cards, player props . Speed: On BNB Chain or Polygon, deposits and withdrawals settle in minutes. Not hours . Cashback: Up to 15% weekly cashback on net losses, with no wagering requirements — a relatively uncommon feature in this segment . No platform is perfect. Dexsport has trade‑offs (lighter license, no native mobile app). But for users who already hold crypto and value control over hand‑holding, it's a trusted functional alternative. Quick Pre‑Match Checklist Whichever route you choose — traditional or Web3 — do this before Saturday: Test withdrawals with a small amount. Don't learn about delays after you win. Pick a fast network if using crypto. BNB Chain, Polygon, TRC20. Not Ethereum. Keep a separate wallet for betting. Limit your exposure. Finals rarely follow probability models. That's part of what makes them worth watching. For bettors, infrastructure matters most when traffic peaks — and the right infrastructure doesn't fail because too many people won at once. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

28 May 2026, 08:02

XRP Is Positioned to Benefit the Most from CLARITY Act. Here’s the Proof

Crypto researcher SMQKE has argued that XRP is positioned to benefit more than any other digital asset if the proposed CLARITY Act becomes law in the United States. SMQKE shared excerpts from a detailed analysis of the bill’s potential impact on the digital asset industry, while emphasizing that the implications extend far beyond short-term market reactions. The post stated that assets classified as digital commodities under the legislation would likely see the removal of what it described as the “regulatory overhang” tied to enforcement actions from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the document shared by SMQKE, altcoins with a history of SEC litigation could experience the strongest response if the bill advances further through Congress. The attached analysis specifically referenced XRP’s recent market reaction following a committee vote connected to the legislation. It noted that XRP briefly climbed above $1.54 before retracing. The passage argued that XRP’s previous legal battle with the SEC places it in a favorable position if the CLARITY Act establishes a clearer legal framework for digital assets in the United States. Yes, XRP is positioned to benefit the most from the CLARITY Act. This is documented. https://t.co/hPNWVMgKre pic.twitter.com/jhKYeX5Bmk — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) May 26, 2026 Focus on DeFi, Exchanges, and Institutional Access Beyond XRP’s market performance, SMQKE’s document focused heavily on the structural changes the bill could introduce for the wider crypto industry. The analysis claimed that explicit protections for non-custodial decentralized finance activities would reduce legal uncertainty for developers and investors operating in the sector. The post also discussed the impact on cryptocurrency exchanges. According to the shared text, the legislation could create a federal registration pathway under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, reducing dependence on the current state-by-state regulatory structure. The analysis argued that this shift could encourage trading activity and liquidity to return to the United States after many firms moved operations offshore during years of regulatory enforcement actions. Another point highlighted in the post involved the banking sector. The document stated that banks would gain a clearer pathway for custody, settlement, and tokenized asset services if the legislation passes. The analysis suggested that such clarity could encourage greater institutional participation in blockchain-based financial products. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Community Reactions Emphasize Long-Term Positioning The post attracted responses from several members of the crypto community who viewed the legislation as particularly beneficial for XRP . Crypto commentator Tyler, known as Crypto Whale, stated that while the CLARITY Act could help the market, it should not be viewed as an immediate catalyst for dramatic price increases. He added that major investors are already positioning themselves ahead of possible regulatory developments. Another user argued that the legislation closely aligns with the long-term vision associated with XRP’s role in financial infrastructure. The comment claimed that the regulatory developments currently moving through the U.S. political system were not designed with the broader crypto market as the primary focus. SMQKE’s post reflects growing attention around the CLARITY Act and its potential consequences for the crypto sector. While the legislation remains under consideration, supporters believe it could significantly reshape how digital assets, exchanges, banks, and institutional investors operate within the United States regulatory framework. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post XRP Is Positioned to Benefit the Most from CLARITY Act. Here’s the Proof appeared first on Times Tabloid .

28 May 2026, 07:00

CFTC seeks to vacate $5M Gemini penalty under revised crypto policy

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission on Wednesday asked a judge to vacate a $5 million penalty imposed on cryptocurrency exchange Gemini Trust Company, saying the agency should never have brought the case. The CFTC said Gemini, founded by twin brothers Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, was wrongly accused of making false statements tied to its bitcoin futures business. Gemini settled the case in January 2025 during the final weeks of former President Joe Biden’s administration. Under the settlement, the company paid a $5 million penalty and agreed to an injunction barring it from making false or misleading statements to the CFTC. However, the CFTC and Gemini have now jointly asked the court to rescind the settlement, citing a shift in the agency’s crypto enforcement policy under President Donald Trump. Joint filing criticises prior enforcement approach In court papers filed jointly, Gemini and the CFTC said the agency had resorted to inappropriate tactics to bring the lawsuit and “extract a settlement from Gemini.” The filing stated that regulators under the Biden administration relied on a whistleblower account that was not credible. According to the filing, Gemini was instead the victim of fraud involving the company’s former chief operating officer and two customers who allegedly received fraudulent rebates from the exchange. The CFTC and Gemini said regulators investigated Gemini for allegedly making misleading statements regarding the integrity of its bitcoin futures trading business instead of investigating the fraud claims against the company. The filing further alleged that regulators used their authority improperly while the case was pending. According to the court filing, the CFTC told Gemini that it would not receive approval for a new prediction market platform while the enforcement action remained active. Gemini later received approval for its prediction market product, Gemini Titan, in December 2025. Questions remain over the refund of the penalty It was not immediately clear from the filing whether Gemini would receive a refund of the $5 million penalty it already paid as part of the settlement. The Winklevoss brothers each donated $1 million in bitcoin to Trump’s 2024 election campaign. Political backdrop adds attention to the case The latest development comes amid broader changes in crypto regulation under the Trump administration. Trump’s initial nominee to lead the CFTC, Brian Quintenz, had accused Tyler Winklevoss last year of lobbying the White House to stall his nomination because of the ongoing CFTC lawsuit against Gemini. Trump later withdrew Quintenz’s nomination and instead selected Michael Selig to chair the agency. Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss first gained public attention after suing Mark Zuckerberg, alleging he stole their idea for Facebook. The twins settled the dispute with Zuckerberg in 2008 for cash and stock. The latest court filing marks a significant reversal by the CFTC and reflects the agency’s changing approach toward cryptocurrency enforcement under the Trump administration. The post CFTC seeks to vacate $5M Gemini penalty under revised crypto policy appeared first on Invezz