Invest ideasNews
25 May 2026, 16:02
XRP At Crossroad? Egrag Crypto Lays Out Two Critical Paths
XRP sits at $1.3571 on the 3-day chart. Crypto analyst EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) is watching the same thesis he has held since April 1. The structure has not changed, and the question now is which direction the price commits to next. EGRAG CRYPTO posted a dual-scenario chart showing two distinct trajectories for XRP. While both eventually end in an upward rally, one first suggests a major decline. Both scenarios hinge on a critical price zone between roughly $1.20 and $1.62, where the chart currently shows consolidation inside a blue support band. #XRP – Green or Red ? Choose your side… and state your reasoning. Since the 1st of April, I have NOT changed my Green or Red trajectory thesis , only tracking how structure develops over time. The noise changes daily… The structure does not. Key levels… pic.twitter.com/3CTu8dAKgm — EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) May 24, 2026 The Green Path: Reclaim $1.65 The bullish scenario targets $1.65 as the first major level to reclaim . On the chart, a green arrow traces upward from the current price, breaking above the blue zone and trending toward the target. The chart shows converging trendlines originating from XRP’s surge in late 2024 , creating a compression zone. XRP has been trading inside that structure for months. A breakout above $1.65 opens the path toward $2.30 and higher on the longer-term projection shown on the chart. The Red Path: A Deep Pullback The bearish scenario is more extended. The red arrow on the chart traces a drop to $1.27, then $1.16, then $1.05, before a potential recovery. The lowest target marked on the chart is $0.777, aligned with a long-term horizontal support level near $0.7746. EGRAG CRYPTO ties the bearish case to a rejection at current levels. While many analysts are bullish about its immediate trajectory , it needs to hold the current level to prevent a decline. The yellow-shaded area on the chart shows a potential accumulation or distribution zone between roughly $1 and $1.30, suggesting XRP could consolidate at lower levels before any recovery. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 The Analysis Has Not Shifted EGRAG CRYPTO has tracked both paths since April 1 without revising the core thesis. His focus is on probabilities rather than predictions. Both scenarios remain active, as price action has not negated either one. The $1.3571 price level is sitting at the dotted midline of the blue support zone on the chart. That zone runs from approximately $1.20 to $1.62. Holding above $1.20 keeps the bullish scenario intact . A close below that level shifts the probability toward the deeper red targets. EGRAG CRYPTO’s final question to his audience is: “Which path is XRP preparing for next?” Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post XRP At Crossroad? Egrag Crypto Lays Out Two Critical Paths appeared first on Times Tabloid .
25 May 2026, 14:03
New research reveals the number of quantum-exposed Bitcoins
A new on-chain analysis has quantified the portion of Bitcoin ( BTC ) currently exposed to potential quantum computing risks while sitting at rest on the blockchain. In this case, approximately 6.04 million BTC, or 30.2% of Bitcoin’s issued supply, has publicly visible keys on-chain, making those coins theoretically vulnerable to future quantum attacks. The remaining 13.99 million BTC, or 69.8%, has no public-key exposure at rest, according to data published by Glassnode on May 20. The study identified two exposure categories, including structural and operational. Structural exposure accounts for 1.92 million BTC, or 9.6% of supply, covering coins inherently exposed by design, including early Pay-to-Public-Key outputs, bare multisig structures, and Taproot outputs. Bitcoin supply by quantum safety chart. Source: Glassnode Operational exposure totals 4.12 million BTC, or 20.6% of supply, stemming from practices such as address reuse, partial UTXO spending, and certain custody setups that unnecessarily reveal public keys. At the same time, cryptocurrency exchanges account for a large share of this exposure, holding roughly 1.63 million to 1.66 million BTC of the operationally exposed supply. Bitcoin quantum operational exposure Exposure levels vary across custodians, with some sovereign holdings, including those of the United States, the United Kingdom, and El Salvador, showing near-zero exposure. Operationally unsafe Bitcoin by entity. Source: Glassnode Glassnode also noted that the risk applies only to coins with publicly visible keys. While current cryptography remains secure, a sufficiently advanced quantum computer using Shor’s algorithm could theoretically derive private keys from known public keys. Coins without visible public keys are not considered exposed under the at-rest model. This distinction matters because at-rest exposure reflects Bitcoin that could be targeted without waiting for a transaction, while on-spend exposure occurs only when coins are moved. Glassnode said operational exposure can be reduced through better wallet practices, including avoiding address reuse, rotating change addresses, and improving custodial reserve management. However, structural exposure tied to older inactive coins may persist. Meanwhile, the research did not predict when quantum attacks on Bitcoin could become practical or assess the security of any exchange or custodian. Instead, it provided a data-driven snapshot of current public-key exposure across Bitcoin’s supply and highlights how improved wallet hygiene and future protocol upgrades could reduce risks. The post New research reveals the number of quantum-exposed Bitcoins appeared first on Finbold .
25 May 2026, 13:06
Buterin says Ethereum Foundation controls just 0.16 percent of ETH
🚨 Buterin reveals the Ethereum Foundation holds just 0.16 percent of all $ETH. The Foundation focuses on research and decentralization, not ETH price jumps. Continue Reading: Buterin says Ethereum Foundation controls just 0.16 percent of ETH The post Buterin says Ethereum Foundation controls just 0.16 percent of ETH appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
25 May 2026, 12:56
Cryptopolitan Report: 37% Of Our Readers Say “Nope” To Consulting AI On Life Decisions. So Who Actually Is?
A little over a year ago, Sam Altman highlighted that Gen Z do not tend to make major life calls without consulting them over ChatGPT. He went onto say that while the older generation treat the tool as a “google replacement”, the younger populace in their 20’s and 30’s use it like a “life advisor”. That comment has aged almost like a cultural diagnosis rather than a prediction. Our newsletter poll, conducted last week as the conversation picked up again, suggests our audience is far less convinced with what was said. The Comment That Set This Off OpenAI CEO Sam Altman made a comment at Sequoia Capital’s AI Ascent event last year that made the rounds across newsrooms and social media. His assertion was that different age groups and generations used ChatGPT for various purposes. This did not come as a warning but rather as what he saw in the data. Older people, he said, use ChatGPT like a smarter version of Google. Meanwhile, people in their 20s and 30s used it more as a tool akin to a life advisor. College students, in his words, use it like an operating system, embedded into how they study, plan, write and make calls about their day. The initial reaction to these comments were not even to say the least. Some people saw it as evidence that this tool is finding its native users. Others on the other hand read it as a subtle warning or danger that an entire cohort or generation was using a machine for judgement even though it runs the risk of sounding confident even when it’s wrong. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle, and our poll suggests that even among readers who follow this space closely, the jury is still out. How Big Has This Behaviour Actually Become? A report published by OpenAI in September 2025 showed that nearly half of ChatGPT messages now come from users below the age of 26, making younger adults the dominant demographic. Younger users are pulling in even quicker. A Pew Research Center survey of 1,391 U.S. teens, conducted between September and October 2024, found that 26% of teens aged 13 to 17 had used ChatGPT for schoolwork, double the 13% recorded the year before. The pattern is even more pronounced among older students: 31% of 11th and 12th graders reported using it. Pew’s more recent 2026 follow-up survey shows the shift has moved beyond homework. According to that survey, 57% of teens now use chatbots for information searches, 54% for schoolwork, and 16% for casual conversation. Around 12% say they use these tools for emotional support or advice. That last number is the one worth sitting with. It is small, but it suggests that the line between “tool” and “confidant” is already being crossed in measurable ways. What The Poll Actually Tells Us As mentioned in our previous poll , these are readers who track AI developments closely and many of them follow OpenAI and Anthropic releases the day they drop. The average age of our newsletter audience sits at around 30, which places this cohort squarely within the “life advisor” group Altman described in his Sequoia talk. If anyone in a general audience would be expected to lean on AI for personal decisions, it would be this group. The fact that the leading response is “Nope” is therefore the most interesting part of the result. Note: The 30-year-old average is based on internal Cryptopolitan estimates and is provided as directional context. It has not been formally surveyed and individual respondents will fall on either side of that figure. Nope (36.76%): Around a third of responses in the poll do not ask AI for any sort of life decisions. It provides a clear view on how this cohort views the utility of AI, perhaps for more technical and productive tasks for work, code research or even thinking out loud. That said, certainly not for the kind of decision that has personal weight behind it. The line being drawn is not anti-AI. It is anti-outsourcing. Yes (~36%): Almost identical in size to the “Nope” cohort. Just over one in three respondents say they do consult AI before life decisions. This is the group most aligned with the behaviour Altman described back in 2025, and it is sizeable. The split between this group and the “Nope” cohort is essentially even, which is itself the story. Even in a tech-forward audience that demographically maps onto the cohort he was talking about, there is no consensus on whether AI belongs in the room when something important is being decided. Occasionally (~27.2%): Roughly one in four respondents sit in the middle. They will use it when it helps, but they are not running every choice through the chatbot. This is probably the most honest answer for most people, and it is a group worth watching. As AI tools improve, this cohort is the one most likely to drift toward the “Yes” column. Combine the “Yes” and “Occasionally” responses and you get just under 63% of readers using AI for personal decisions at least some of the time. That number lines up reasonably well with the broader behavioural trend Altman pointed to. What the poll adds is the texture underneath it, a clear segment of people who have looked at this technology, understood what it can do and then decided that some calls don’t require AI intervention and it’s theirs to make. The Quieter Trend Under The Headline The discussion about AI and decision-making usually splits into two camps. One worries about cognitive atrophy and the slow erosion of judgement. The other points to all the small, useful ways AI already helps people think more clearly. Both are right, depending on the type of decision. What our poll suggests is that the question may already be sorting itself out at the user level. Roughly equal portions of the audience are landing in three different places, and the largest of the three is the one drawing a line. That is not what you would expect to see if AI advice was simply replacing human judgement across the board. It looks more like people are learning where it helps and where it does not, and that calibration is happening in real time. The cohort to watch is still the one Altman described, the students who arrived on campus in 2022 with ChatGPT already in their pocket and never knew an academic environment without it. They are graduating now. The data on what happens when an entire working generation makes decisions with an AI assistant in the loop does not exist yet, because they are the first ones generating it. The next few years will tell us whether this is the smartphone moment for cognition, or something more complicated. Our poll suggests that even among people who follow this space for a living, the answer is still being worked out. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
25 May 2026, 12:55
Singapore’s Economy Shows Resilience, AI Demand Provides Tailwinds: DBS
BitcoinWorld Singapore’s Economy Shows Resilience, AI Demand Provides Tailwinds: DBS Singapore’s economy is demonstrating notable resilience amid global headwinds, with artificial intelligence-related demand emerging as a significant growth driver, according to a recent analysis from DBS Group Research. The report underscores how the city-state is leveraging its strategic position in the global semiconductor and electronics supply chain to capture opportunities from the AI boom. Growth Forecast and Key Drivers DBS economists project Singapore’s gross domestic product to expand by a steady pace in 2025, supported by a recovery in manufacturing and sustained strength in services. The report highlights that the electronics cluster, particularly semiconductor production and advanced packaging, is benefiting from surging demand for AI chips and data center infrastructure. This aligns with the broader regional trend where Southeast Asian economies are seeing increased foreign investment in tech-related manufacturing. The analysis also points to a robust labor market and moderating inflation as supporting domestic consumption. While external demand remains a variable, Singapore’s diversified trade links and pro-business environment provide a buffer against global economic fluctuations. AI Tailwinds and Semiconductor Demand A central theme of the DBS report is the structural uplift from artificial intelligence. Singapore is home to several major semiconductor fabrication plants and has attracted significant investments in AI research and development. The government’s National AI Strategy and initiatives like the AI Verify Foundation are positioning the country as a regional hub for AI governance and innovation. The report notes that global demand for AI-related hardware, including high-bandwidth memory and advanced logic chips, is creating spillover effects for Singapore’s manufacturing sector. This is expected to partially offset weakness in other export segments, such as chemicals and precision engineering, which face softer demand from China and Europe. Implications for Investors and Policymakers For investors, the DBS analysis suggests that Singapore-listed companies with exposure to the semiconductor and AI supply chain could see sustained earnings growth. The report also flags potential upside from the recovery in the non-oil domestic exports segment, which has been under pressure for several quarters. From a policy perspective, the resilience narrative supports the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s current stance of maintaining a modest appreciation path for the Singapore dollar. The central bank is expected to keep its exchange rate policy unchanged in the near term, given that inflation is moderating and growth remains on track. Conclusion DBS’s assessment reinforces the view that Singapore is well-positioned to navigate global economic uncertainties, thanks to its strategic focus on high-value manufacturing and digital economy growth. The AI tailwinds, in particular, provide a meaningful buffer against external headwinds. While risks remain—including geopolitical tensions and a potential slowdown in global tech spending—the outlook for Singapore’s economy remains cautiously optimistic. FAQs Q1: What is the main driver of Singapore’s economic resilience according to DBS? DBS highlights AI-related demand, particularly in semiconductors and advanced electronics, as a key growth driver alongside a strong labor market and moderating inflation. Q2: How is Singapore benefiting from the global AI boom? Singapore’s semiconductor manufacturing sector, including advanced packaging and chip production, is experiencing increased demand from AI hardware needs. Government initiatives in AI governance also attract investment. Q3: What risks does the DBS report identify for Singapore’s economy? The report notes risks from global geopolitical tensions, weaker demand from China and Europe, and potential slowdowns in global tech spending that could affect export segments. This post Singapore’s Economy Shows Resilience, AI Demand Provides Tailwinds: DBS first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
25 May 2026, 11:05
Virtus Investment’s $154B ETF Boosts Stake in Strategy (STRC) to $40 Million
BitcoinWorld Virtus Investment’s $154B ETF Boosts Stake in Strategy (STRC) to $40 Million The InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF, managed by the $154 billion asset manager Virtus Investment Partners, has increased its holdings in Strategy (STRC) to 402,880 shares. The position is currently valued at approximately $40 million, according to recent filings. Details of the Increased Stake The move signals a notable vote of confidence from a major institutional player in a company that has been actively restructuring its business. The InfraCap ETF, which focuses on preferred securities, typically seeks income-generating investments with a focus on capital preservation. The increased allocation to STRC suggests the fund’s managers see a favorable risk-reward profile in the company’s preferred shares. Implications for Investors For market observers, this adjustment provides a data point on how professional money managers are positioning themselves within the preferred stock space. Virtus’s decision to increase its exposure to Strategy (STRC) comes at a time when the broader market is navigating interest rate uncertainty and sector rotation. The $40 million position, while a fraction of Virtus’s total assets under management, represents a meaningful bet on the specific security. Why This Matters Preferred stock ETFs like the InfraCap fund offer investors a hybrid between bonds and common equity. The increase in the STRC holding suggests that the fund’s analysis points to sustainable dividends or potential price appreciation in the preferred shares. This move can also be seen as a signal to retail investors about the perceived stability of Strategy’s capital structure. Conclusion The increased stake by Virtus Investment’s InfraCap Preferred Stock ETF in Strategy (STRC) underscores the ongoing institutional interest in the company’s preferred securities. As market conditions evolve, such portfolio adjustments offer valuable insight into the strategies of large asset managers. Investors will be watching for further moves from Virtus and other institutional players in the coming quarters. FAQs Q1: What is the InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF? A: It is an exchange-traded fund managed by Virtus Investment Partners that invests primarily in U.S. preferred stocks, aiming to provide income and capital preservation. Q2: Why is Virtus increasing its stake in Strategy (STRC)? A: While the exact reasoning is proprietary, the increase suggests the fund’s managers see value in STRC’s preferred shares, likely due to attractive yield or favorable risk characteristics. Q3: How does this affect individual investors? A: This move provides a signal from a large institutional investor about the potential of STRC. However, individual investors should conduct their own research and consider their own risk tolerance before making investment decisions. This post Virtus Investment’s $154B ETF Boosts Stake in Strategy (STRC) to $40 Million first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
