News
10 Apr 2026, 16:05
Analyst Says XRP Secretly Handed Us the Breakout of the Decade. Here’s What Happened

Financial markets often transition through long periods of compression before sudden expansions redefine price trajectories. Traders watch for these moments closely, as they frequently signal momentum shifts that can persist for years. In the XRP market, a growing technical narrative suggests that such a transition may already be unfolding, with price action now testing whether a major structural breakout can sustain itself. Chart analysis shared by ChartNerd outlines a multi-year formation that he describes as a symmetrical triangle breakout, followed by a strong upward continuation into a new all-time high in July 2025. According to his interpretation, XRP has now entered a critical retest phase that could determine whether the broader breakout structure remains valid. Multi-Year Compression and Structural Breakout The analysis identifies a long-term symmetrical triangle that developed over several years, reflecting steadily tightening price ranges and reduced volatility. This type of formation typically signals accumulation and indecision before a directional resolution. ChartNerd argues that XRP resolved this structure in Q4 2024 with a decisive breakout. He links this move to a broader historical pattern observed in earlier XRP cycles, where similar compression phases preceded aggressive upward expansions once resistance levels flipped into support. $XRP SECRETLY HANDED US THE BREAKOUT OF THE DECADE The multi-year symmetrical triangle was finally broken in Q4 2024, and after placing a new ATh in July 2025, we're now searching for a CRITICAL retest. This is the exact setup as the smaller triangle in earlier cycles… https://t.co/cvpSERLUbP pic.twitter.com/WvkkCC276S — ChartNerd (@ChartNerdTA) April 9, 2026 Retest Phase and Market Validation Following the breakout, XRP entered what the analyst describes as a retest phase . In technical analysis, a retest occurs when the price revisits a breakout level to confirm its strength as support. This stage often determines whether a breakout continues or fails. The current price action centers around a key support region near $1.30. XRP trades close to this level in early April 2026, with volatility reflecting an ongoing battle between buyers defending the breakout zone and sellers testing its durability. ChartNerd’s framework suggests that maintaining this support zone would validate the breakout structure and strengthen the case for continued upward movement. Historical Cycle Comparisons The analysis draws parallels between the current structure and earlier XRP cycles in 2013 and 2017. In both instances, XRP formed smaller symmetrical triangles, broke upward, retested key levels, and then entered extended bullish phases. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 ChartNerd emphasizes that the present formation mirrors those earlier cycles but on a larger time scale. He describes the pattern sequence as compression, breakout, retest, and expansion—an iterative structure that has historically preceded strong directional trends in XRP. Market Implications of the Current Structure If XRP successfully holds its retest zone, the analysis suggests that the market could enter a sustained expansion phase lasting multiple years. This outcome depends on continued buyer strength, stable liquidity conditions, and favorable macro sentiment across digital asset markets. However, technical analysts also recognize that breakout structures fail when support levels break down. In that scenario, price action could re-enter a broader consolidation phase instead of continuing upward. A Defining Moment for XRP Price Structure XRP now sits at a critical technical juncture where confirmation or rejection of the breakout will likely shape medium-term market direction. Traders closely monitor the $1.30 region as the decisive threshold in this structure. As the retest unfolds, the market continues to evaluate whether XRP has truly entered a new structural phase—or whether the breakout still requires further validation before the next major trend emerges. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Analyst Says XRP Secretly Handed Us the Breakout of the Decade. Here’s What Happened appeared first on Times Tabloid .
10 Apr 2026, 15:05
BitMEX research identifies Amy Jade Winehouse as Satoshi Nakamoto

Too soon to move on from Adam Back as Satoshi Nakamoto? 17 years later, BitMEX research identified Amy Jade Winehouse as the anonymous creator of Bitcoin. After the New York Times publication, this research appears to be a mockery or a theatre to anyone who has been in the Bitcoin space for a while. Who is Amy Jade Winehouse? Born on September 14, 1983, and died on July 23, 2011, Amy was a British singer, songwriter, and musician known for her powerful contralto voice, raw autobiographical lyrics, and a unique blend of soul, jazz, R&B, and retro influences. In the last couple of years, many people have been publicly speculated upon, accused, or named as possible Satoshis in media reports, documentaries, books, forum discussions, and investigations. What makes Amy Jade Winehouse the one? BitMEX makes it clear, “The case is finally closed. I have removed any lingering doubt in my mind that I have found the right woman.” British enough to be Satoshi Nakamoto? According to BitMEX’s research , their first piece of evidence is a British connection. Per on-chain data, Bitcoin’s first block had an embedded text from a newspaper headline: “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.” The specific headline under discussion was published in the British edition of The Times of London, not its international or web edition, since it mentioned the name of the chancellor, “Alistair Darling.” According to BitMEX, anyone of British origin meets the first criterion to be Satoshi Nakamoto – that’s around 68 million Satoshi’s. Adam Back gets behind BitMEX’s Satoshi joke The second Brit clue is that Amy Jade Winehouse was also a British national living in London, Camden. Her death is of great concern. Three months prior to her death, on 26 April 2011, Satoshi sent the last on-chain communication. I wish you wouldn’t keep talking about me as a mysterious, shadowy figure; the press just turns it into a pirate-currency angle. Satoshi Nakamoto According to the exposee, this explains why Satoshi never spent any of the coins mined in 2009. Amy Jade Winehouse tied to Adam Back According to BitMEX, Amy released her last studio album, “Back to Black,” on 27 October 2006 as a tribute to Adam Back, who developed the Proof of Work concept used in Bitcoin through HashCash. It is also interesting to note that, just slightly less than two years later, Satoshi published the Bitcoin whitepaper, once more referring to Adam Back, just as Amy did in naming her album. It took Satoshi 18 months to develop Bitcoin. This is an exact match for BitMEX, considering that the period elapsed between Amy’s final album and the launch of the Bitcoin White Paper. Satoshi Nakamoto’s 24th email while developing Bitcoin . And then the UK Spectator Magazine ran an article claiming that Satoshi was none other than “Adam Black,” whereas Adam’s last name is actually “Back” and not “Black”. Now, was it a coincidence? The Spectator Magazine is owned by the billionaire hedge fund manager Sir Paul Marshal of Marshall Wace, who knows his onions. There is simply no way that Sir Paul would allow such a thing to slip into the magazine. Celebrity album timelines have also made it to identifying Satoshi Nakamoto. Mixing “Back” with “Black” so we would think of “Back to Black,” Amy’s final album. BitMEX stands by their Satoshi This is not the first time BitMEX has pinned Amy Winehouse as Satoshi Nakamoto. Their ‘exposee’ comes on the back of many years of satirical data and small clues. Amy Jade Winehouse was a smart Libertarian According to Juliette Ashby, who had been Amy’s lifelong friend since she was four years old, speaking in an interview in 2025, Winehouse was considered to be “highly intelligent.” Winehouse had used drugs illegally for her enjoyment. In this sense, it would be quite logical to deduce that Winehouse disagreed with laws that prohibited the use of drugs and that she had been violating those laws. The legalization of drugs is a typical stance for libertarians. Libertarians usually believe that everyone is entitled to do what he or she wants, provided it harms no one else. Satoshi was also a libertarian, and she even knew that the Bitcoin system would appeal to people who had a “libertarian perspective”. To that end, all liberals are marked as Satoshi Nakamoto. In the end, we are all Satoshi. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
10 Apr 2026, 14:00
Bitcoin May Avoid Immediate Quantum Upgrade With New Workaround: Study

A Bitcoin transaction that costs $75 to $150 in GPU compute is not built for daily use, but it may still matter. StarkWare chief product officer Avihu Levy has put forward a scheme called Quantum Safe Bitcoin , or QSB, that he says could make new BTC transfers resistant to quantum attacks without changing the Bitcoin protocol. The proposal is designed to work even against a large quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm. A Workaround Inside Bitcoin’s Existing Rules Levy’s plan stays within the crypto’s current legacy script limits and does not require a soft fork. Instead of relying on elliptic curve math, QSB swaps in a hash-to-signature puzzle. In simple terms, the sender must find an input whose hash output happens to look like a valid ECDSA signature, a process that depends on brute-force work rather than the kind of math quantum computers are expected to break. That makes the scheme unusual. It does not try to rebuild Bitcoin from the ground up. It tries to bolt on a narrow shield using rules that already exist. The researchers describe it as a temporary answer while the bigger question of its long-term quantum defense remains unsettled. Praise, Pushback And A Narrow Use Case StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson called the work “huge” and said it essentially makes Bitcoin quantum-safe today . But not everyone agrees with that framing. Bitcoin ESG specialist Daniel Batten said the claim goes too far because the paper does not address exposed public keys or dormant wallets. He pointed to an estimated 1.7 million BTC sitting in early P2PK addresses that could be vulnerable if a quantum computer becomes powerful enough to crack them. The new scheme also comes with a sharp limit on who might use it. According to the proposal, it is more complex than a standard BTC transaction and only makes sense for large transfers. The reported compute cost makes it a poor fit for routine payments. THIS IS HUGE. Bitcoin is Quantum-Safe TODAY. Even if a quantum computer appeared, one that breaks the conventional Bitcion signatures, it shows a practical way to create safe Bitcoin transactions. WITH NO CHANGE TO BITCOIN PROTOCOL!!! https://t.co/ireGc3ai7W — Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io (@EliBenSasson) April 9, 2026 A Temporary Fix, Not The Final Answer The debate around quantum risk has already split the Bitcoin community. Some argue for leaving Bitcoin unchanged to preserve its original design. Others want vulnerable coins frozen or burned. A separate group wants the protocol upgraded to support quantum-safe signatures. Levy’s proposal lands in the middle of that fight, giving users a last-resort option while skipping the need for network-wide consensus. The researchers still say protocol-level changes are the better long-term path. They also acknowledged that the QSB approach is non-standard, does not scale to all users, and does not cover use cases such as the Lightning Network. The timing of the paper matters too. Google published research in March that added fresh pressure to the debate, and Lightning Labs chief technology officer Olaoluwa Osuntokun followed with a quantum fallback prototype on Wednesday. Featured image from Pixabay, chart from TradingView
10 Apr 2026, 09:40
US War Spending Burden: UBS Reveals Alarming Impact on National Spending Power

BitcoinWorld US War Spending Burden: UBS Reveals Alarming Impact on National Spending Power NEW YORK, March 2025 – A comprehensive new analysis from global financial giant UBS presents a stark examination of the United States’ escalating war burden and its direct, measurable impact on national spending power. This report, drawing on decades of fiscal and geopolitical data, arrives at a critical juncture for US economic policy. Consequently, it provides essential context for understanding the complex trade-offs between national security commitments and domestic fiscal health. The findings illuminate a challenging path forward for policymakers. US War Spending: A Historical and Fiscal Analysis UBS analysts have meticulously tracked US defense expenditures across multiple administrations and conflict periods. Their data reveals a persistent and growing fiscal commitment. For instance, the post-9/11 era triggered a significant and sustained increase in military outlays. These funds have supported prolonged engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq, among other global operations. Furthermore, recent geopolitical tensions in Eastern Europe and the Indo-Pacific have prompted additional budgetary allocations. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) consistently flags defense spending as a primary driver of long-term federal debt. UBS corroborates this view, highlighting how these expenditures compete directly with investments in infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Modern warfare involves staggering costs beyond simple troop deployments. The integration of advanced technologies like cyber capabilities, space-based assets, and next-generation aircraft creates immense financial pressure. A 2024 report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) noted the US accounted for nearly 40% of global military spending. This dominance comes with a substantial opportunity cost for the domestic economy. UBS economists point to a clear correlation: as defense budgets swell, discretionary spending on non-defense priorities often faces constraints or reductions. The Direct Mechanism: From Treasury to Battlefield UBS outlines the direct fiscal mechanism. Congressional appropriations for the Department of Defense translate into immediate treasury outflows. These funds purchase equipment, sustain personnel, and finance ongoing operations. Over time, this creates a structural element within the federal budget. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has repeatedly warned about cost overruns and accountability gaps in major defense acquisition programs. These inefficiencies, as UBS notes, exacerbate the overall burden. Every dollar allocated to these areas is a dollar not available for alternative public investments or deficit reduction. The Impact on US Spending Power and Economic Stability The term ‘spending power’ in the UBS context refers to the government’s fiscal flexibility and the broader economy’s resilience. High levels of defense spending can influence this power in several key ways. Firstly, it contributes to larger annual budget deficits and a growing national debt. Elevated debt levels can crowd out private investment and place upward pressure on interest rates. Secondly, it can lead to a distortion in the industrial base, with talent and capital flowing toward defense contracting at the expense of other innovative sectors. Finally, it limits the federal government’s capacity to respond to domestic crises, such as economic recessions or public health emergencies, with robust fiscal stimulus. UBS provides comparative data to ground its analysis. The table below illustrates the trade-off in recent fiscal years: Fiscal Year Defense Spending (Approx.) Potential Alternative (Equivalent Funding) 2023 $800 Billion Nationwide High-Speed Rail Network Seed Funding 2024 $850 Billion Universal Pre-K Education for 5 Years 2025 (Projected) $900+ Billion Major Green Energy Infrastructure Initiative This perspective does not argue against necessary defense. Instead, it frames the expenditure as a conscious choice with significant economic consequences. The UBS report emphasizes that without strategic reform, the compounding cost of legacy systems and new threats will continue to strain US fiscal resources. Expert Perspectives and Strategic Implications Financial strategists at UBS are not alone in their assessment. Former Pentagon comptroller officials and academic economists from institutions like Harvard’s Kennedy School echo similar concerns. They argue for a more rigorous cost-benefit analysis of military engagements and procurement. The concept of ‘strategic prioritization’ becomes paramount. Experts suggest the US must clearly define its core security interests and align spending accordingly, rather than maintaining a global posture without periodic, critical reassessment. The implications extend beyond borders. The US’s fiscal health is a cornerstone of global economic stability. A nation grappling with debt sustainability concerns may find its diplomatic and strategic leverage subtly diminished. Allies and adversaries alike monitor US fiscal capacity as an indicator of long-term staying power. Therefore, managing the war burden is not merely a domestic budget issue but a core component of grand strategy. UBS concludes that a sustainable approach requires: Enhanced Acquisition Oversight: Implementing stricter controls to curb waste in defense contracting. Alliance Burden-Sharing: Encouraging NATO and Pacific allies to increase their defense contributions. Technology-Driven Efficiency: Leveraging AI and data analytics for more cost-effective logistics and readiness. Regular Strategic Reviews: Instituting mandatory, bipartisan assessments of global force posture and associated costs. Conclusion The UBS analysis on US war spending and national spending power delivers a crucial, evidence-based warning. It demonstrates that sustained high levels of defense expenditure create tangible fiscal trade-offs that impact economic flexibility and long-term stability. Navigating this challenge demands informed debate, strategic clarity, and a commitment to fiscal responsibility alongside robust national security. The path forward, as outlined by financial and policy experts, requires balancing immediate threats with the enduring need for a strong, resilient, and fiscally sound American economy. FAQs Q1: What does UBS mean by ‘war burden’ in this context? UBS defines the ‘war burden’ as the total financial cost incurred by the United States to fund ongoing military operations, maintain global force posture, modernize equipment, and support veterans’ care. This includes both direct appropriations and long-term liabilities. Q2: How does military spending directly reduce ‘spending power’? It reduces spending power by consuming a large portion of the federal budget, limiting funds for other public investments, contributing to higher national debt, and potentially raising borrowing costs for the government and private sector, which can slow economic growth. Q3: Is UBS suggesting the US should cut its defense budget? UBS does not prescribe specific policy cuts. Instead, the analysis highlights the economic consequences of current spending levels and advocates for strategic reforms, greater efficiency, and burden-sharing with allies to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability alongside security. Q4: What are the biggest drivers of cost in modern US defense spending? Major cost drivers include personnel salaries and benefits, research and development for next-generation technologies (like hypersonic weapons and AI), procurement of complex systems (fighter jets, ships), and the sustainment costs of maintaining a global network of bases and ongoing operations. Q5: How does US military spending compare to other global powers? The US spends more on its military than the next ten highest-spending countries combined, according to most international assessments. This unparalleled scale is central to the UBS analysis of its unique fiscal impact on the US economy compared to other nations. This post US War Spending Burden: UBS Reveals Alarming Impact on National Spending Power first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
10 Apr 2026, 09:07
Analyst: The Bounce Is Over on XRP. The Real Move Hasn’t Happened Yet

A fresh technical outlook suggests XRP may be approaching a decisive phase. Market momentum has shifted after a brief recovery, positioning the asset for a potential downward move. According to crypto analyst CasiTrades (@CasiTrades), the recent price action aligns with a classic Elliott Wave setup that could define XRP’s near-term trajectory. Her outlook identifies a completed corrective phase and anticipates an accelerated decline as the next major move unfolds. The Bounce Is Over on XRP. Now Watching for W3 Down That ceasefire push over the last several hours sent XRP perfectly into the .618 retracement and finally gave us a clean W2. It knocked out the one of the smaller subwave counts but the bigger structure hasn't changed.… pic.twitter.com/2CwGro30jK — CasiTrades (@CasiTrades) April 8, 2026 Fibonacci Resistance Confirms Wave 2 Completion The chart shows XRP retracing to the 0.618 Fibonacci level near $1.39. This retracement marked a key resistance zone and validated the completion of Wave 2 within the broader Elliott Wave structure . The rejection from this level reinforces the bearish outlook and signals the start of Wave 3. CasiTrades emphasized the precision of this move, noting that “that ceasefire push over the last several hours sent XRP perfectly into the .618 retracement and finally gave us a clean W2.” This reaction highlights the importance of Fibonacci levels in identifying turning points and guiding technical projections. The chart also indicates that smaller subwave counts have been invalidated, while the dominant structure remains intact. This strengthens confidence in the overarching Elliott Wave count and supports expectations of continued downside momentum . Wave 3 Targets $1.09 With Accelerated Momentum Wave 3 typically represents the strongest and most decisive phase in an Elliott Wave sequence. In this case, the projected decline points toward the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement level near $1.09. The analysis suggests that XRP could move to this zone speedily. CasiTrades outlined this expectation clearly, stating, “I’m still expecting a W3 down toward ~$1.09, and this should accelerate fast!” The projection aligns with the descending channel illustrated on the chart, which continues to guide XRP’s price structure. Supporting this outlook, trendlines indicate sustained downward pressure. A broader descending formation intersects with key Fibonacci levels, reinforcing the likelihood of continued movement toward the projected target. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 The RSI also shows an upward trend in recent sessions, reflecting temporary strength that often precedes decisive directional moves in structured corrections. Key Levels to Watch in the Coming Sessions The analysis identifies critical price zones that could shape XRP’s next phase. Immediate resistance remains near $1.37-$1.4, corresponding with the 0.5 and 0.65 Fibonacci retracement levels. A sustained move below $1.3 would confirm bearish momentum and strengthen the case for Wave 3. The projected support area near $1.09 stands as the primary downside target. This level serves as a pivotal zone for potential stabilization before the next market cycle develops. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Analyst: The Bounce Is Over on XRP. The Real Move Hasn’t Happened Yet appeared first on Times Tabloid .
10 Apr 2026, 08:52
Dark Defender Says XRP Broke Our Orange Resistance, Predicts Next Price Target

A decisive move on the 3-day chart has positioned XRP for a potential historic rally. The digital asset has confirmed a breakout above a key resistance level while maintaining strong structural integrity. This development aligns with a bullish technical outlook supported by multiple indicators and wave formations. Crypto analyst Dark Defender shared his latest analysis , highlighting XRP’s progress toward higher price levels. His chart shows a clear breakout above the orange resistance trendline following repeated support at the Fibonacci retracement level near $1.31. This technical validation strengthens the bullish case and signals growing market confidence. In his statement, the analyst noted that the C Wave is complete, confirming the conclusion of a corrective phase. This milestone often marks the beginning of a renewed upward trend, reinforcing expectations of continued price expansion . Hi all. $XRP broke our orange resistance on the 3-Day chart after respecting our structure and support $1.31 white Fibonacci line multiple times. C Wave Complete Resistance-Support Triangle Break RSI Bullish Cross A new all-time high is in sight. pic.twitter.com/5xlXBj4aAn — Dark Defender (@DefendDark) April 8, 2026 Triangle Breakout Confirms Bullish Momentum The chart outlines a Resistance-Support Triangle that XRP has successfully breached. This breakout reflects a continuation pattern that often precedes strong upward movements. According to the analyst, the asset has broken out of this Resistance-Support Triangle, further validating the bullish structure. The price action shows consistent respect for the $1.31 Fibonacci level, identified as the 50.00% retracement zone. Multiple rebounds from this support indicate strong buying interest and reinforce its importance as a foundation for future gains. Dark Defender’s projection also highlights Fibonacci extension targets at 123.60% near $1.66, 161.80% around $1.88, and 261.80% extending toward $5.85 , a new all-time high for the asset. These technical markers outline a clear trajectory for XRP’s next phase. The breakout above the descending resistance line suggests strengthening momentum as the asset advances toward these targets. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 RSI Bullish Cross Strengthens Outlook Momentum indicators support the bullish narrative. The Relative Strength Index on the 3-day chart has formed a bullish crossover , signaling improving strength and sustained buying pressure. This crossover typically signals a shift in sentiment and aligns with the broader technical structure presented in the chart. Rising RSI levels indicate strengthening demand and reinforce expectations of continued upside movement. Together with the completed wave structure and confirmed breakout, the momentum indicator adds further credibility to the forecast. Dark Defender summarized the outlook, stating that “A new all-time high is in sight.” This shows confidence in XRP’s trajectory as it approaches critical extension levels outlined in the analysis. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Dark Defender Says XRP Broke Our Orange Resistance, Predicts Next Price Target appeared first on Times Tabloid .



































