News
2 Apr 2026, 17:40
Indonesia’s Inflation Crisis: Navigating Energy Policy Risks and Economic Stability in 2025

BitcoinWorld Indonesia’s Inflation Crisis: Navigating Energy Policy Risks and Economic Stability in 2025 JAKARTA, March 2025 – Indonesia faces mounting economic pressure as inflation concerns intersect with critical energy policy decisions, according to recent analysis from DBS Group Research. The Southeast Asian nation’s economic trajectory now hinges on balancing price stability with sustainable energy transitions. Indonesia’s Inflation Landscape in 2025 Consumer prices in Indonesia have shown persistent elevation throughout early 2025. The country’s inflation rate currently exceeds regional averages, presenting challenges for monetary policymakers. Several factors contribute to this sustained pressure on prices. Food inflation remains particularly stubborn, driven by supply chain disruptions and climate-related agricultural impacts. Transportation costs continue rising due to global energy market volatility. Additionally, administered price adjustments for electricity and fuel have transmitted directly to consumer baskets. The central bank, Bank Indonesia, maintains a cautious stance on interest rates. Consequently, monetary policy faces difficult trade-offs between controlling inflation and supporting economic growth. Recent data indicates core inflation remains above the target band of 2-4%. Indonesia Inflation Indicators – Q1 2025 Indicator Current Rate Target Range Trend Headline Inflation 4.8% 2-4% Upward Core Inflation 3.9% 2-4% Stable Food Inflation 7.2% N/A Volatile Transportation 5.1% N/A Rising Energy Policy Crossroads and Economic Implications Indonesia’s energy sector stands at a critical juncture, according to DBS analysis. The nation must navigate complex policy decisions that will significantly impact both inflation and long-term economic stability. Energy represents approximately 15% of the consumer price index basket. The government continues implementing its energy transition roadmap. However, this transition creates immediate inflationary pressures through several channels. Renewable energy investments require substantial upfront capital expenditure. These costs often translate to higher electricity tariffs for consumers and businesses. Simultaneously, fossil fuel subsidy reforms remain politically sensitive. Gradual subsidy reductions aim to improve fiscal sustainability. Nevertheless, they directly increase transportation and production costs throughout the economy. This creates a challenging policy environment for inflation management. Key energy policy risks identified include: Subsidy reform timing – Accelerated reductions could spike inflation Renewable integration costs – Infrastructure investments pressure prices Global energy volatility – External shocks transmit quickly domestically Industrial competitiveness – Energy costs affect manufacturing exports DBS Research Perspective on Policy Coordination DBS economists emphasize the need for coordinated policy responses. Monetary and fiscal authorities must align their approaches to address inflation-energy interactions. The research highlights several critical considerations for policymakers. First, energy policy decisions require careful sequencing to minimize inflationary impacts. Second, social protection measures must cushion vulnerable households from energy price adjustments. Third, investment in energy efficiency can reduce long-term inflationary pressures. The analysis suggests Indonesia’s inflation outlook remains highly dependent on energy policy trajectories. Successful navigation of these challenges could position the country for sustainable growth. However, missteps risk entrenching inflationary expectations and undermining economic stability. Comparative Regional Analysis and Global Context Indonesia’s situation reflects broader regional trends in Southeast Asia. Many emerging economies face similar inflation-energy policy dilemmas. However, Indonesia’s circumstances present unique characteristics worth examining. The country’s status as a major commodity exporter creates different transmission mechanisms. Energy price changes affect both domestic consumption and export revenues. This dual impact complicates policy responses compared to net energy importers. Furthermore, Indonesia’s geographic fragmentation increases energy distribution costs. Infrastructure development across thousands of islands presents logistical challenges. These structural factors contribute to persistent energy-related inflation pressures. Globally, energy transition commitments under the Paris Agreement create additional considerations. Indonesia must balance domestic price stability with international climate obligations. This multidimensional challenge requires sophisticated policy frameworks. Sectoral Impacts and Business Environment Different economic sectors experience varying impacts from inflation and energy policy changes. Manufacturing faces particular challenges due to energy-intensive production processes. Transportation and logistics sectors respond directly to fuel price adjustments. Consumer-facing businesses confront demand pressures as household purchasing power erodes. Meanwhile, renewable energy companies see growth opportunities despite transitional challenges. This creates a complex business environment requiring adaptive strategies. Foreign investors monitor these developments closely. Inflation stability and predictable energy policies represent key considerations for investment decisions. Consequently, policy clarity becomes crucial for maintaining Indonesia’s investment attractiveness. Conclusion Indonesia’s economic outlook in 2025 remains closely tied to inflation management and energy policy decisions. The intersection of these challenges requires careful navigation by policymakers. DBS analysis highlights both risks and opportunities in this complex landscape. Successful outcomes depend on coordinated policy responses across monetary, fiscal, and energy domains. Furthermore, social protection measures must accompany necessary adjustments. Indonesia’s experience offers valuable lessons for other emerging economies facing similar transitions. The nation’s large domestic market and resource endowment provide important buffers. However, effective policy implementation remains essential for economic stability. Monitoring inflation trends and energy policy developments will continue as critical priorities throughout 2025. FAQs Q1: What is driving Indonesia’s current inflation? Multiple factors contribute including food supply disruptions, transportation cost increases, and administered price adjustments for energy. Climate impacts on agriculture and global commodity volatility also play significant roles. Q2: How does energy policy affect inflation in Indonesia? Energy represents about 15% of the consumer price basket. Policy decisions on subsidies, renewable transitions, and infrastructure investments directly impact electricity and fuel prices, which transmit throughout the economy. Q3: What are the main risks identified by DBS analysis? Key risks include poorly timed subsidy reforms, high renewable integration costs, vulnerability to global energy shocks, and potential erosion of industrial competitiveness due to energy price increases. Q4: How does Indonesia’s situation compare to regional neighbors? While facing similar inflation-energy dilemmas, Indonesia’s circumstances differ as a major commodity exporter. This creates unique policy challenges compared to net energy importing neighbors in Southeast Asia. Q5: What sectors are most affected by these economic conditions? Manufacturing, transportation, and consumer-facing businesses experience significant impacts. Energy-intensive industries face particular challenges, while renewable energy companies see growth opportunities despite transitional pressures. This post Indonesia’s Inflation Crisis: Navigating Energy Policy Risks and Economic Stability in 2025 first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
2 Apr 2026, 13:31
Quantum Will Soon Be Able to Crack Bitcoin In Under 9 Minutes

EasyA Co-Founder Dom Kwok has published a post on X highlighting newly released research from Google’s quantum computing team, emphasizing its implications for Bitcoin ‘s future security. In the post, Dom Kwok stated that quantum computers could soon break Bitcoin’s cryptographic protections in under nine minutes, with a reported 41 percent success rate under certain conditions. The commentary centers on a recently published paper that examines the potential impact of cryptographically relevant quantum computers on elliptic curve cryptography, which underpins Bitcoin’s security model. Dom Kwok referenced the paper’s findings as a shift from previous assumptions, emphasizing that the resources required to carry out such an attack may be significantly lower than earlier estimates. quantum will soon be able to crack bitcoin in under 9 minutes, with a 41% success rate. new research from google's quantum team suggests cracking bitcoin requires less than 500k qubits (much less than the “millions” previously assumed). pic.twitter.com/NN1RYqu2CK — Dom Kwok | EasyA (@dom_kwok) March 31, 2026 Lower Qubit Requirement Signals Shift in Assumptions According to the post, earlier projections suggested that millions of qubits would be necessary to compromise Bitcoin’s encryption. However, Dom Kwok noted that the new research indicates that fewer than 500,000 qubits could be sufficient. This figure represents a substantial reduction and suggests that the technical barrier to executing such an attack may be lower than previously believed. The research paper outlines resource estimates for breaking the 256-bit elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem, which is central to Bitcoin’s cryptographic framework. The authors describe how advances in quantum architecture and error correction could make it possible to execute Shor’s algorithm more efficiently than earlier projections suggested. Dom Kwok presented these findings as evidence that the timeline for quantum-related vulnerabilities may be shorter than expected. The post does not claim that such an attack is currently feasible but frames the research as an indication of rapid progress in quantum computing capabilities. Focus on Execution Time and Success Probability A key element of the post is the reference to execution time. Dom Kwok stated that under the conditions described in the research, a quantum system could complete the necessary computations in under nine minutes. Dom Kwok also cited a 41 percent success rate, suggesting that such an attack would not be guaranteed but could still pose a meaningful risk if repeated or optimized. The underlying paper explains that these estimates depend on specific assumptions about hardware performance, including logical qubit stability and gate efficiency. It also distinguishes between different types of quantum architectures, noting that faster “clock speeds” in certain systems could enable more practical attack scenarios. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Implications for Cryptographic Transition Dom Kwok’s post aligns with the broader conclusion of the research paper, which encourages a transition toward post-quantum cryptographic standards. The paper highlights that blockchain systems, including Bitcoin, may face vulnerabilities if quantum computing reaches the required scale and efficiency. By presenting these findings, Dom Kwok emphasizes the importance of monitoring developments in quantum computing and their implications for digital asset security. Separately, the XRP Ledger is already positioning itself for a post-quantum future , marking a strategic shift that places it ahead of most blockchains still reliant on cryptographic standards vulnerable to future quantum attacks. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Quantum Will Soon Be Able to Crack Bitcoin In Under 9 Minutes appeared first on Times Tabloid .
2 Apr 2026, 11:10
Vitalik Buterin wants to move your AI off the cloud and onto your desktop

Vitalik Buterin says that the only secure way to move forward is to keep artificial intelligence on your personal devices. He points out new “agent” systems that present considerable security threats. The Ethereum founder has stopped using cloud-based artificial intelligence. He runs everything on his own machines now. And he wants other people to do the same. He put out a long post on April 2, 2026. In it, he said he has been building an AI setup that he calls “self-sovereign, local, private, and secure.” He says his worry is real. “I come from a position of deep fear of feeding our entire personal lives to cloud AI,” he wrote. “Just when end-to-end encryption and local-first software are finally becoming mainstream… we may be taking ten steps back.” Since the beginning of 2026, he has been advising people to switch to this. He sees it as a means of resisting the longstanding move toward centralized tech services. Why AI agents worry Vitalik Buterin A significant factor in his change of heart is that AI is no longer what it once was. It is more than just a chatbot that provides answers. AI systems can now act as “agents,” which means they use hundreds of tools to finish tasks on their own. However, Buterin believes people aren’t taking the security risks of this shift seriously enough. To support this, he pointed to research on tools like OpenClaw . These studies found that AI agents can change important computer settings or messaging channels without asking you first. For example, a hacked website could trick an AI agent into downloading and running a harmful script, giving a stranger complete control over your computer. The research also showed that about 15% of the “skills” these agents use contain hidden commands. Those commands quietly send user data to outside servers. Shahaf Bar-Geffen runs a crypto company called COTI. He put the privacy problem this way: “Without privacy, Web3 is doomed to be a kind of castle in the sky that sounds great in theory, but in practice simply doesn’t work.” How he built his local setup Buterin’s solution is to keep everything local for better privacy and security. He tested different hardware setups using a model called Qwen3.5:35B. These tests showed that anything under 50 tokens per second is too slow to be useful and just “too annoying.” For his own work, he found that 90 tokens per second is the ideal speed. Of the machines he tested, the NVIDIA 5090 Laptop was the top performer, reaching 90 tokens per second. On the other hand, the DGX Spark, which is marketed as a personal supercomputer, only managed 60 tokens per second. Buterin called it “lame,” pointing out that a high-end laptop offered a superior experience. A comparison of processing speeds across different hardware setups for running local AI models. Source: Vitalik Buterin He uses NixOS for software and runs llama-server in the background. He also employed a tool named bubblewrap, which generates isolated environments to restrict the AI’s access to specific files. He said he sees artificial intelligence as something useful, but not fully trustworthy, similar to how Ethereum developers treat smart contracts. As the local models are not as good as the cloud ones when it comes to harder reasoning tasks, he has built in some practical workarounds. One is a 2-of-2 confirmation approach where the AI drafts something, for example, an email or a transaction, but nothing goes out until a person signs off on it. He also keeps a 1 TB folder of Wikipedia data locally so he can look things up without sending queries out to the internet. When he needs to use a remote model, he passes the request through a local model so that it can filter out any sensitive information. Some people cannot afford their own setup. For them, Buterin suggested that they work together with a small group to buy a shared computer with a stable internet and access it remotely. Since artificial intelligence is everywhere now, he thinks being cautious is just common sense. He believes that keeping things local, using sandboxes, and not trusting the system are just practical ways to stay in control of your own digital life. If you want a calmer entry point into DeFi crypto without the usual hype, start with this free video.
2 Apr 2026, 09:18
Google Research Paper Makes Notable Confirmation About XRP

The XRP Ledger has made a significant advancement in blockchain security. Recent research from Google confirms that the ledger deployed post-quantum ML-DSA signatures on its AlphaNet test instance. This step highlights XRP’s proactive approach to future-proofing its technology against emerging quantum threats. Crypto influencer Xaif (@Xaif_Crypto) highlighted this milestone on X, noting the research and sharing an image from the paper. While Bitcoin and Ethereum remain quantum-vulnerable, XRP stands out as a blockchain actively implementing quantum-resistant measures . The development confirms that years of work to strengthen the ledger’s security are producing tangible results. BREAKING: Google research paper confirms $XRP ledger has deployed post-quantum ml-dsa signatures on its alphanet test instance. while bitcoin & ethereum remain quantum-vulnerable, xrpl is already being cited in academic research as a blockchain actively implementing… pic.twitter.com/i9BtehVZfu — Xaif Crypto | (@Xaif_Crypto) March 31, 2026 Quantum-Safe Architecture The XRP Ledger’s design enables the integration of post-quantum cryptography. By adopting ML-DSA signatures, the network can protect transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers. These signatures provide a high level of security while maintaining the ledger’s efficiency and speed. Other blockchains, like Solana and Algorand, are also exploring post-quantum technologies. Solana deployed an experimental feature called Winternitz Vault that uses WOTS to protect digital assets. Algorand implemented post-quantum Falcon signatures for smart contracts and state proofs. However, XRP is the only blockchain cited in academic research as currently implementing quantum-proof signatures on a test network. Strengthening Financial Infrastructure The XRP Ledger also supports RWA tokenization , compliance controls, issuer permissions, and asset metadata. The system is already in use by financial institutions and currently holds about two-thirds of all short-dated U.S. Treasury bill tokens. These capabilities highlight XRP’s readiness to support regulated digital assets and to implement advanced security measures. The ledger’s post-quantum updates ensure that institutions can rely on it for high-value transactions with reduced risk of future attacks. Users can change private keys linked to their accounts, allowing migration to quantum-safe protocols over time. While this mechanism does not fully guarantee quantum security today, it establishes a clear path for future-proofing the network. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Confirmed Research and Industry Recognition The confirmation from Google’s research validates XRP’s multi-year effort to incorporate quantum-resistant cryptography. By deploying these measures on AlphaNet, developers can test and refine security protocols before broader network adoption. Xaif emphasized the importance of this step in demonstrating XRP’s commitment to innovation and long-term resilience. This advancement positions XRP ahead of other major digital assets, which are still threatened by quantum computing . Having a blockchain network that actively integrates post-quantum measures strengthens its reliability and appeal for global financial applications. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Google Research Paper Makes Notable Confirmation About XRP appeared first on Times Tabloid .
2 Apr 2026, 04:59
Adrian Wall of Digital Sovereignty Alliance Speaks on Tokenization at Penn Blockchain Conference 2026

Washington, D.C., April 1, 2026 — The Digital Sovereignty Alliance (DSA) , a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing clear and ethical public policy, research and education surrounding emerging technologies, today announced the successful conclusion of its participation in the 6th Penn Blockchain Conference as a Platinum Sponsor, held on March 27–28 at the Penn Museum in Philadelphia. The conference and hackathon, organized by the University of Pennsylvania’s Blockchain Club, brought together students, developers, and industry leaders to explore the evolving role of decentralized technologies. Designed to bridge academia and industry, the event fosters interdisciplinary collaboration and supports the development of research-driven, real-world applications of blockchain systems. On the second day of the conference, Adrian Wall, Managing Director of DSA, participated in a panel titled “Where Tokenization Actually Makes Sense,” moderated by Hannah Fang, President of the Penn Blockchain Club. He was joined by speakers Yuki Yuminaga, CEO of Tenbin Labs; Franklin Bi, General Partner at Pantera Capital; George Calle, Research Partner at Inversion; and Orest Gavryliak, Chief Legal Officer at 1inch. The discussion focused on examining how global economies are adapting to digital assets and where real-world applications are beginning to take hold. Panelists explored practical use cases, regulatory considerations, and the conditions required for tokenized systems to move beyond experimentation and achieve meaningful adoption. “Anyone can digitize an asset, but tokenization only works when it’s backed by liquidity, distribution, collateral utility, and real settlement. Otherwise, it’s just a wrapper,” said Adrian Wall. “In the near term, tokenized Treasuries are leading, but the market will ultimately decide what scales.” DSA’s presence at the Penn Blockchain Conference underscores its commitment to engaging with emerging talent and supporting informed dialogue at the intersection of technology and public policy. The organization continues to collaborate with students, researchers, and industry stakeholders to advance education and policy frameworks that promote responsible innovation and digital sovereignty. About Digital Sovereignty Alliance The Digital Sovereignty Alliance (DSA) is a nonprofit social welfare organization committed to advocating for public policies that support ethical innovation in decentralized technologies, blockchain, cryptocurrency, Web3, and artificial intelligence. DSA conducts research, organizes educational events, and promotes policies that prioritize public welfare and digital sovereignty. Media contact Maghan Lusk [email protected]
1 Apr 2026, 23:25
South Korea’s Economic Outlook: Robust Growth Fueled by Chip Boom and Fiscal Support – ING Analysis

BitcoinWorld South Korea’s Economic Outlook: Robust Growth Fueled by Chip Boom and Fiscal Support – ING Analysis SEOUL, South Korea – The nation’s economic trajectory for 2025 appears increasingly resilient, bolstered by a potent combination of rebounding semiconductor exports and proactive government fiscal measures, according to a recent analysis by ING Bank. This dual-engine support system is crucial for navigating global economic uncertainties and sustaining momentum. South Korea’s Growth Outlook: A Semiconductor Resurgence South Korea’s export-driven economy is witnessing a significant tailwind from the global semiconductor sector. After a cyclical downturn, demand for memory chips and advanced logic semiconductors is recovering robustly. Consequently, major Korean chipmakers like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are reporting improved earnings and ramping up capital expenditure. This upturn directly translates into higher export volumes, a critical component of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Moreover, the semiconductor supply chain stimulates domestic investment and supports high-value employment. The Bank of Korea’s recent data confirms this trend, showing a marked increase in export values month-over-month. The Role of Fiscal Policy in Economic Support Parallel to the private sector’s strength, the South Korean government is deploying fiscal tools to underpin economic stability. Specifically, authorities have announced supplementary budgets and targeted spending initiatives aimed at stimulating domestic consumption and supporting vulnerable economic segments. These measures are designed to counterbalance external headwinds and ensure balanced growth. Furthermore, fiscal support extends to research and development incentives for future technologies, including artificial intelligence and next-generation chips. This strategic spending not only provides immediate economic stimulus but also invests in long-term competitive advantages. ING’s Analytical Perspective on Key Drivers Economists at ING highlight the synchronized nature of these growth drivers. Their analysis points to inventory cycles in the tech sector normalizing, which subsequently fuels orders for Korean components. Simultaneously, they note that government fiscal policy is effectively mitigating downside risks from softer global demand in other sectors. The firm’s models suggest that without this fiscal boost, growth projections would be notably lower. Therefore, the current policy mix is seen as both timely and essential. Global Context and Comparative Performance South Korea’s position is unique among major advanced economies. While many nations grapple with slowing manufacturing, Korea’s deep integration into the high-tech supply chain provides a distinct advantage. For instance, the global push for digital transformation and AI infrastructure relies heavily on the memory chips Korea produces efficiently. Compared to regional peers, Korea’s export basket is more concentrated in high-value, in-demand electronics, which offers both higher margins and greater cyclical volatility. The following table outlines key comparative indicators: Indicator South Korea Regional Average GDP Growth Forecast (2025) 2.3% – 2.6% 1.8% – 2.1% Export Growth (YTD) +8.5% +5.2% Semiconductor Share of Exports ~18% ~7% Fiscal Stimulus (% of GDP) ~1.2% ~0.8% This data underscores the outsized role of chips and state support in the national economic profile. Potential Risks and Market Considerations Despite the positive outlook, analysts identify several risk factors. Primarily, the growth narrative remains highly dependent on the continuation of the global tech cycle. Any unexpected slowdown in major markets like China or the United States could dampen export momentum. Additionally, geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains present an ongoing concern. Domestically, household debt levels and an aging demographic structure pose longer-term challenges to sustainable growth. However, the current fiscal buffer provides policymakers with room to maneuver should these risks materialize. Conclusion South Korea’s economic growth outlook for the coming year is firmly supported by a powerful synergy between a cyclical recovery in semiconductor exports and deliberate fiscal expansion. Analysis from institutions like ING confirms that this dual support system enhances economic resilience. While external risks persist, the foundational strengths in advanced manufacturing and proactive policy responses position the South Korean economy for stable, albeit moderate, growth. The performance of the chip sector will undoubtedly remain a critical barometer for the nation’s overall economic health. FAQs Q1: What is the main reason for South Korea’s improved economic outlook? The primary drivers are a strong recovery in global semiconductor demand, boosting exports, and supplementary fiscal spending from the government to stimulate the domestic economy. Q2: Which South Korean companies benefit most from the chip boom? Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, the world’s leading memory chip manufacturers, are the primary beneficiaries, driving export figures and domestic investment. Q3: How does fiscal policy support economic growth in this context? The government uses supplementary budgets and targeted spending to boost domestic consumption, support R&D, and cushion the economy against potential external shocks, creating a more balanced growth environment. Q4: What are the biggest risks to this positive growth forecast? Key risks include a sharper-than-expected global economic slowdown, a downturn in the tech cycle, geopolitical disruptions to supply chains, and domestic challenges like high household debt. Q5: How does South Korea’s growth outlook compare to other advanced economies? Due to its dominance in semiconductors, South Korea’s growth outlook is often more volatile but currently stronger than many peers, as it capitalizes on specific global demand for high-tech components. This post South Korea’s Economic Outlook: Robust Growth Fueled by Chip Boom and Fiscal Support – ING Analysis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .





































