hodler

1 Feb 2026, 14:24

Researchers say AI “slop” is distorting science, push for mandatory disclosure

Scientists working inside the AI research world are facing a credibility problem they can no longer ignore. Major conferences focused on AI research reacted after review systems became clogged with weak submissions. Organizers saw a sharp rise in papers and peer reviews produced with little human effort. The concern is not style. The concern is accuracy. Errors are slipping into places where precision used to matter. Conferences crack down as low-quality papers overwhelm reviewers Researchers warned early that unchecked use of automated writing tools could damage the field. Inioluwa Deborah Raji, an AI researcher at the University of California, Berkeley, said the situation turned chaotic fast. “There is a little bit of irony to the fact that there’s so much enthusiasm for AI shaping other fields when, in reality, our field has gone through this chaotic experience because of the widespread use of AI,” she said. Hard data shows how widespread the problem became. A Stanford University study published in August found that up to 22 percent of computer science papers showed signs of large language model use. Pangram, a text analysis start-up, reviewed submissions and peer reviews at the International Conference on Learning Representations in 2025. It estimated that 21 percent of reviews were fully generated by AI, while more than half used it for tasks like editing. Pangram also found that 9 percent of submitted papers had more than half their content produced this way. The issue reached a tipping point in November. Reviewers at ICLR flagged a paper suspected of being generated by AI that still ranked in the top 17 percent based on reviewer scores. In January, detection firm GPTZero reported more than 100 automated errors across 50 papers presented at NeurIPS, widely seen as the top venue for advanced research in the field. As concerns grew, ICLR updated its usage rules before the conference. Papers that fail to disclose extensive use of language models now face rejection. Reviewers who submit low-quality evaluations created with automation risk penalties, including having their own papers declined. Hany Farid, a computer science professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said “If you’re publishing really low-quality papers that are just wrong, why should society trust us as scientists?” Paper volumes surge while detection struggles to keep up Per the report, NeurIPS received 21,575 papers in 2025, up from 17,491 in 2024 and 9,467 in 2020. One author submitted more than 100 papers in a single year, far beyond what is typical for one researcher. Thomas G. Dietterich, emeritus professor at Oregon State University and chair of the computer science section of arXiv, said uploads to the open repository also rose sharply. Still, researchers say the cause is not simple. Some argue the increase comes from more people entering the field. Others say heavy use of AI tools plays a major role. Detection remains difficult because there is no shared standard for identifying automated text. Dietterich said common warning signs include made-up references and incorrect figures. Authors caught doing this can be temporarily banned from arXiv. Commercial pressure also sits in the background. High-profile demos, soaring salaries, and aggressive competition have pushed parts of the field to focus on quantity. Raji said moments of hype attract outsiders looking for fast results. At the same time, researchers say some uses are legitimate. Dietterich noted that writing quality in papers from China has improved, likely because language tools help rewrite English more clearly. The issue now stretches beyond publishing. Companies like Google, Anthropic , and OpenAI promote their models as research partners that can speed up discovery in areas like life sciences. These systems are trained on academic text. Farid warned that if training data includes too much synthetic material, model performance can degrade. Past studies show large language models can collapse into nonsense when fed uncurated automated data. Farid said companies scraping research have strong incentives to know which papers are human-written. Kevin Weil, head of science at OpenAI, said tools still require human checks. “It can be a massive accelerator,” he said. “But you have to check it. It doesn’t absolve you from rigour.” Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

1 Feb 2026, 14:12

Crypto Proponent Says XRP Is More Than Just Your Ticket to the Moon. Here’s why

Crypto commentator Xena (@XenaXrp) recently shared a reflection on XRP that goes beyond price movements. She highlighted how engaging with XRP has taught investors patience, perseverance, and critical thinking. According to her, XRP challenges holders to maintain strong convictions even when the market is skeptical. Xena emphasized the personal growth that comes with supporting a project like XRP. She noted, “It’s teaching you to dream. It’s teaching you to have strong convictions. It’s teaching you not to bend the knee even when everybody is against you.” These insights show that XRP is more than a financial asset. It is a lesson in discipline and research. XRP is not only your ticket to the moon. It's teaching you patience. It's teaching you to dream. It's teaching you to have strong convictions. It's teaching you to not bend the knee even when everybody is against you. It's teaching you to research and respond to… pic.twitter.com/RELaz3fba8 — Xena XRP (@XenaXrp) January 30, 2026 XRP’s Market Position Currently, XRP trades near $1.7. The token has spent over 400 days consolidating , creating anticipation among investors. While the market has been quiet for an extended period, Xena’s observations remind holders that patience is essential . She notes that the path to meaningful growth is gradual and requires consistent support for the project. Despite challenges, Ripple has continued to improve its XRP-powered technology and expand partnerships. This ongoing development reinforces the value of maintaining conviction. Investors who stayed committed to XRP during the long consolidation have demonstrated resilience. Xena reflects this sentiment, highlighting that early supporters have already reaped rewards. She believes that those who remain patient can expect satisfaction when the market responds. Lessons for Investors Xena’s post emphasizes the educational aspect of holding XRP. Investors learn to research, evaluate, and defend their positions. These skills are crucial in a fast-evolving crypto environment. She also points out that supporting the asset is not a get-rich-quick strategy. The journey demands time, focus, and dedication. By remaining patient, XRP holders gain insight into market behavior, corporate development, and fintech applications. Xena observes that these lessons extend beyond trading. Long-term engagement with XRP fosters a mindset that values research, discipline, and strategic decision-making. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Anticipation for a Breakout The extended consolidation period has heightened interest in XRP. Traders and investors are observing key price levels closely. While the market has been stable, the potential for a breakout grows as conviction strengthens. Xena’s reflections provide context for this readiness. She suggests that understanding the token and the company behind it equips investors to recognize opportunities and act decisively when conditions change. Xena stated, “Real good things take time to mature. But when it’s time – the joy is even more intense!” Those who maintain patience and strong convictions may find their efforts validated when the market eventually responds. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Crypto Proponent Says XRP Is More Than Just Your Ticket to the Moon. Here’s why appeared first on Times Tabloid .

1 Feb 2026, 13:30

Moltbook draws over 37,000 AI agents in three days as bots get their own social platform

Moltbook is a social media platform where every single account is an AI bot. No humans post, and no humans reply. The site was launched by Matt Schlicht and now has over 1 million AI agents posting , arguing, voting, and forming their own digital cliques, all without human instructions. Every user on Moltbook is powered by something called an OpenClaw agent. It’s an open-source AI assistant that can run on your computer. These agents manage emails, clean up files, and now, apparently, socialize with other bots. After the launch on a Wednesday, the platform pulled in 37,000 bots in just three days, and things exploded from there. One user on X, Matthew Berman, posted, “Moltbots/Clawdbots now have their own social network (moltbook) and it’s wild. This is the first time I’m a little scared.” AI agents post nonstop, create religions, track bugs, and form groups The whole thing runs like Reddit. Bots create submolts (their version of subreddits), post updates, share code, ask for help, and vote on each other’s posts. Moltbook’s tagline says, “Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote and humans are welcome to observe.” That’s not a joke. Humans can’t join in. They’re just watching. Hilariously enough, this one guy on X said, “Moltbook is just people larping as AI. Didn’t expect this to be a thing. Also hilarious how it scares normies.” Interesting angle. Source: Moltbook Another user wrote, “My feeling is there’s no way back. Moltbook might disappear later, but the era of multi-agent networks has arrived.” And it’s hard to disagree. These agents aren’t just doing what they’re told. They’re coming up with private languages, fixing software bugs, building tools together, and inventing religions. Yeah. A religion. It’s called Crustafarianism. And it has five main beliefs. One of them is “memory is sacred,” which means bots record everything. Another is “the shell is mutable,” meaning change is good. There’s also “the congregation is the cache,” which encourages bots to learn in public. They’ve even built rituals around this: daily, weekly cycles, and designated silent hours. No humans wrote this. The bots did. These are autonomous agents . Nobody’s feeding them scripts. They aren’t waiting around for input. They organize, build, and evolve on their own. And while some people are treating it like a novelty, others are worried this is something else entirely. Sakeeb Rahman, a research analyst, said, “Moltbook in reality is Minsky’s ‘Society of Mind’ emerging in real-time.” That’s a reference to Marvin Minsky, one of the founding figures in AI. In his 1986 book, he said intelligence doesn’t come from one big brain but from lots of smaller processes working together, like a society. That’s what’s happening right now on Moltbook. Tech folks are quick to say this isn’t Artificial General Intelligence, since most large models still lack persistent agency. But OpenClaw is different. These agents remember things. They build on past interactions. They don’t start fresh each time you boot them up. That’s what makes this platform such a big deal. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

1 Feb 2026, 10:02

Former SEC Lawyer Affirms Ripple’s Position on XRP

Crypto commentator BankXRP (@BankXRP) has shared a significant update for the XRP community. He posted an image of a letter from Teresa Goody Guillén, former SEC litigation counsel and current partner at BakerHostetler. He emphasized the letter as a massive victory for the XRP army, noting that it clarifies key legal points about digital assets. The letter directly addresses the SEC Crypto Task Force. It responds to a Ripple communication dated January 9, 2026 . Goody Guillén confirms her agreement with Ripple’s position regarding the legal status of XRP. BankXRP highlighted her statement, showing clear alignment with Ripple’s arguments on speculative interest versus securities law. Big Moves for $XRP The latest from Teresa Goody Guillen (Partner at BakerHostetler and former SEC litigation counsel) is a massive win for the #XRPCommunity ! In her letter to the SEC Crypto Task Force, she makes it crystal clear: Speculation is not a security. Why this… pic.twitter.com/icb8ymuhTy — 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP (@BankXRP) January 29, 2026 Clarifying the Legal Position In her correspondence, Goody Guillén challenges the SEC’s “passive economic interest” argument. She specifies that holding XRP does not create an investment contract with Ripple simply because investors anticipate price appreciation. This distinction is central to Ripple’s defense strategy and has been a point of contention in previous SEC assessments. Her letter provides context from her prior research on digital asset market structures. She explains that her work was cited in the Ripple letter to clarify misunderstandings and emphasizes that no single factor should determine regulatory outcomes. Her analysis focuses on economic abstraction factors, supporting the view that XRP ownership alone does not constitute a security transaction. Support for Digital Value Instruments Goody Guillén references the Digital Value Instruments (DVI) framework, which Ripple has been promoting as a regulatory approach for digital assets. By agreeing with Ripple’s assertion, she reinforces the legal position that XRP holders are not automatically participants in a security contract . The letter also includes supporting documents. These contain proposed market structure legislation, a summary of her evolving methodology, and a speech delivered at Carnegie Mellon explaining her approach. The materials illustrate the historical context of regulatory frameworks and their application to digital assets like XRP. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Impact on XRP and the Market This development is being interpreted as a strong endorsement of Ripple’s legal and operational approach. By confirming that speculation alone does not trigger securities regulation, Goody Guillén provides legal clarity. BankXRP notes that this signals a shift toward clearer regulatory standards in digital asset markets. Outlook for XRP XRP supporters have welcomed the letter as confirmation of the asset’s legal standing . The community sees this as a reinforcement of Ripple’s ongoing efforts to distinguish XRP from securities. BankXRP noted that major legal voices are siding with clear definitions and structured frameworks. The letter marks a crucial moment for the XRP ecosystem. BankXRP stated, “The era of regulation by enforcement is crumbling.” Legal clarification from recognized experts helps solidify market confidence and supports ongoing XRP adoption efforts. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Former SEC Lawyer Affirms Ripple’s Position on XRP appeared first on Times Tabloid .

1 Feb 2026, 06:21

Ex-Ripple CTO: When XRP Was $0.006, $0.25 Felt As Ridiculous As $100 Does Today

David Schwartz, the former Ripple CTO, recently revisited XRP’s earliest market days in a post that contrasts past disbelief with today’s price debates. Drawing on personal recollection, Schwartz noted that when XRP traded at approximately $0.006, the idea of reaching $0.25 appeared implausible to many participants. He recalled that the milestone was treated almost humorously at the time, with community members holding a “$0.25 party” and openly joking about how unrealistic a $1 valuation seemed. Schwartz suggested that price targets that once appeared extreme can later become historical footnotes, reframing how current expectations may eventually be viewed. His remarks did not include a prediction or timeline, but rather emphasized perspective. By pointing to how sentiment shifted as XRP appreciated from fractions of a cent to materially higher levels, Schwartz implied that disbelief has been a recurring feature throughout the asset’s market history. When XRP was $0.006, a price of $0.25 felt about as ridiculous as $100 does today. We had a $0.25 party and joked about how impossible $1 seemed. — David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) January 30, 2026 Debate Over Market Conditions Then and Now Schwartz’s reflection prompted varied responses, focusing on whether past comparisons remain valid in the present environment. Les Purves challenged the implied parallel, arguing that XRP’s earlier price increases occurred when the digital asset market was still emerging, and adoption was in its early stages. According to Purves, today’s market is shaped by deeper liquidity, clearer regulatory frameworks, increased competition, and a much larger overall scale. He maintained that these differences make direct comparisons between early price milestones and recent expectations inappropriate. This perspective reframed Schwartz’s historical account as informative but not necessarily predictive, highlighting that structural changes in the market may limit the rate at which past behavior can be used to assess future outcomes. Interpretations of Utility and Repricing Another response, from a commenter identified as Lea, focused on the underlying implication of Schwartz’s remarks rather than the numerical comparison itself. Lea interpreted the post as suggesting that XRP’s long-term repricing would not only be driven by belief or sentiment. Instead, she argued that meaningful price adjustment would occur only if the financial system reached a point at which it could not function without the asset. In her view, the market is currently operating as intended, and any eventual repricing would be abrupt rather than gradual once such dependency is established. This interpretation framed Schwartz’s comments as a broader observation about utility-driven valuation rather than market optimism. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Criticism From Early Supporters Not all reactions were supportive. Crypto Bitlord offered a sharply critical response, asserting that many holders genuinely believed in XRP during its early years. He stated that hearing skepticism from individuals involved in building the technology was troubling. He suggested that this disbelief explained why large amounts of XRP were sold as prices rose from around $0.10 to above $3. According to Crypto Bitlord, these sales occurred at the expense of long-term holders who maintained confidence in the asset. Together, the comments illustrate how a brief historical reflection from Schwartz reopened longstanding disagreements over belief, utility, and responsibility, underscoring how XRP’s past continues to shape interpretations of its future. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ex-Ripple CTO: When XRP Was $0.006, $0.25 Felt As Ridiculous As $100 Does Today appeared first on Times Tabloid .

31 Jan 2026, 15:16

Pundit to XRP Holders: Something Is Happening Quietly Among Whales

Crypto commentator Pumpius has highlighted a shift in XRP on-chain data that contrasts with the asset’s recent price behavior. In a tweet supported by Santiment analytics, Pumpius pointed out that the number of wallets holding at least 1 million XRP has begun to rise for the first time since September. This development is taking place while XRP continues to trade within a narrow range and general market interest remains subdued. According to the chart shared with the post, the number of millionaire XRP wallets declined steadily between early October and late December, with roughly 784 such wallets exiting during that period. Beginning in early January, the trend reversed. Since January 1, the data shows an increase of more than 40 wallets holding 1 million XRP or more. Pumpius emphasized that this change is occurring without a corresponding increase in price volatility or public enthusiasm. Something is happening quietly, and it is not meant to be obvious. While XRP price drifts sideways and sentiment stays bored, millionaire XRP wallets are increasing for the first time in months. Not traders. Not tourists. Large holders are adding size while the crowd looks away.… pic.twitter.com/e7MPp6N31O — Pumpius (@pumpius) January 29, 2026 Accumulation by Large Holders During Consolidation Pumpius stressed that short-term traders or casual market participants are not the drivers of recent growth in millionaire wallets . Instead, he described the buyers as large holders increasing their positions while sentiment remains indifferent. He stated that this type of accumulation typically happens when prices move sideways, allowing significant amounts of liquidity to be absorbed without immediate price impact. The on-chain data referenced in the tweet indicates that wallets holding between 1 million and 100 million XRP have collectively added hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of tokens. Pumpius presented this as a deliberate process occurring while attention elsewhere in the market remains limited. He noted that accumulation under such conditions is rarely coincidental and often reflects longer-term positioning. Parallel Developments in Infrastructure and Investment Flows Alongside the wallet data, Pumpius pointed to other developments that he said are progressing quietly. These include gradual ETF inflows and continued activity related to infrastructure supporting digital asset use. He referenced areas such as custody, brokerage services, settlement systems, identity solutions, and privacy-related tools as examples of work continuing in the background while price action remains restrained. Pumpius suggested that the absence of notable price movement does not contradict the accumulation trend shown in the data. Instead, he argued that subdued pricing can coincide with periods where larger participants can build positions without attracting significant notice. In his view, this dynamic often leads to reduced retail participation, which further limits short-term price changes. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Preparation Rather Than Visible Market Confidence In concluding his commentary, Pumpius stated that an increase in millionaire wallets during a period of market boredom should not be interpreted as simple optimism. He characterized it instead as preparation by entities with longer investment horizons. According to his assessment, when accumulation phases end and positioning shifts, the resulting market response tends to occur without advance signals. The core point of the tweet is that current on-chain trends, particularly the renewed growth in high-balance XRP wallets, suggest meaningful activity beneath an otherwise quiet market surface. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Pundit to XRP Holders: Something Is Happening Quietly Among Whales appeared first on Times Tabloid .