Invest ideasNews
21 Mar 2026, 01:00
Cardano (ADA) Eyes Reversal: Weekly Chart Signals Upturn
Cardano (ADA), currently ranked among the largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, has experienced a prolonged downward trajectory over recent months. The asset’s current position shows a sustained period of selling pressure that began in September, shortly after a brief phase of strength recorded in July and August. Even though September initially showed signs of continued upward movement, the month closed slightly lower. This was the beginning of a consistent decline that extended through February, with each successive month ending in negative territory. Over these six months, ADA steadily moved lower, losing a significant portion of its value. From its peak near $0.95 in September , the asset has dropped approximately 71%, at one point revisiting levels close to $0.22, which align with previous cycle lows. This zone attracted buying interest, preventing further downside and establishing a critical support region. Emergence of a Technical Signal Recent technical analysis suggests that this prolonged bearish phase may be approaching a turning point. Crypto analyst Ali Martinez highlighted that a TD Sequential indicator has completed a “9” count on the weekly chart. This formation is commonly interpreted as an early indication of trend exhaustion, often preceding a shift in price direction. The appearance of this signal on a higher timeframe strengthens its relevance, as weekly indicators generally carry more weight than those observed on shorter intervals. According to Martinez, such setups are typically followed by a period of upward price movement, which could occur within the next four weeks, depending on broader market conditions. Although shorter-term charts may still show uncertainty or weakness, signals from higher timeframes often guide the broader market structure. This suggests that any near-term fluctuations could eventually align with a more constructive outlook if the signal holds. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Conditions for Confirmation Despite the emergence of a bullish indicator, confirmation remains dependent on key price levels. For the projected recovery to materialize, ADA must maintain a weekly close above the $0.23 support level. A breakdown below this threshold would invalidate the current setup and weaken the case for a reversal. At present, Cardano is trading around $0.26, positioning it above this critical level. This supports the possibility that the market may attempt a recovery, provided that buying pressure remains consistent. If the support level continues to hold, analysts anticipate an initial move toward $0.32, followed by a potential extension to $0.37. These targets represent moderate gains from current levels and would signal a meaningful shift in momentum after months of decline. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Cardano (ADA) Eyes Reversal: Weekly Chart Signals Upturn appeared first on Times Tabloid .
20 Mar 2026, 21:00
XRP Faces Make-Or-Break Moment — $1.55 Holds The Key
XRP is approaching a critical turning point as price action tightens near a key resistance zone. The $1.55 level now stands as the defining barrier, with a breakout potentially signaling a stronger recovery, while continued rejection could reinforce downside pressure. The $1.54 Level Comes Back Into Focus XRP has managed to climb back into a key short-term range, bringing the $1.54 area back into focus. From a broader perspective, MakroVision Research noted that the overall chart structure still appears weak despite the recent recovery, as XRP continues to trade below major resistance zones. However, in the short term, the price action suggests an attempt to build a base following the sharp and impulsive pullback. Related Reading: XRP Nears Breakout: Analyst Maps Path Back To All-Time High The range between $1.32 and $1.55 has now become the defining structure to watch. This zone is acting as a battleground between buyers and sellers, with price consolidating as it seeks to establish a clearer trend. Support remains firm around the $1.32 level, and holding above it keeps the current stabilization intact. On the upside, $1.55 represents the first major hurdle, and a sustained breakout above this level could significantly improve the outlook, opening the path toward $1.82. A move beyond that would be needed to ease the medium-term pressure and confirm a stronger recovery trend. XRP Faces Critical Test At Resistance Level The analyst revealed that XRP could navigate a high-stakes structural test as it approaches a decisive pivot point. While the asset is attempting to stabilize, it stands directly before a critical area that has already rejected the price multiple times. Without a clear breakout, the current upward movement remains categorized as a mere technical counter-move rather than a true trend reversal. Related Reading: XRP Price Bullish Momentum Expands — Market Eyes Next Surge A clean breakout above the $1.55 resistance level is the primary catalyst required to shift the narrative, as mentioned earlier. Until this barrier is convincingly breached, the market picture remains clouded by the recent impulsive pullback and the proximity of overhead supply. The downside risks are equally defined, centered on the $1.32 support zone. If XRP fails to maintain its footing and records two consecutive daily closes below this mark, the current stabilization effort would effectively tip. Such a breakdown would significantly increase the risk of retesting lower price territories. Ultimately, the situation is coming to a head as XRP struggles against these well-defined boundaries. If the current rejection at the $1.55 zone continues, the bearish momentum may quickly regain control. The market’s near-term direction hinges entirely on whether bulls can flip $1.55 into support or bears will force a retreat through the foundational support at $1.32. Featured image from Freepik, chart from Tradingview.com
20 Mar 2026, 15:30
Bitcoin Is Rising To The Quantum Challenge, Galaxy Report Says
Bitcoin’s quantum risk is real, but the network is not sleepwalking into it. That is the core conclusion of a March 19 research note from Galaxy Digital, which argues that while a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could one day threaten exposed Bitcoin wallets, developers are already doing substantial work on mitigation and migration. Will Owens, a research analyst at Galaxy, frames the current debate as more polarized than the underlying facts justify. On one side are those who argue quantum computing is still decades away. On the other are those warning that the window may be far shorter and that Bitcoin needs to move now. Galaxy’s position sits between those camps: urgency is warranted, but so is perspective. Bitcoin Is Getting Ready For The Quantum Threat The report makes one point repeatedly. Not all bitcoin is equally exposed. Funds are only vulnerable when public keys are visible on-chain, which means the biggest long-term risk sits with legacy wallet formats, reused addresses, some exchange or custodian setups, and older outputs including coins believed to be tied to Satoshi Nakamoto. Citing analysis from Project Eleven , Galaxy says roughly 7 million BTC, worth about $470 billion at recent prices, may be vulnerable under a broad “long exposure” definition, though it notes other estimates come in lower depending on methodology. That distinction matters because Bitcoin’s UTXO model still gives it structural protection that account-based chains do not. As Galaxy puts it, “In Bitcoin, public keys are typically revealed only when coins are spent, meaning a large share of the supply remains protected behind hashed addresses until transaction time.” The report adds: “This distinction does not eliminate risk for Bitcoin, but it does materially affect the scope and sequencing of exposure in a potential Q-day event .” In other words, Bitcoin has a narrower attack surface than many casual discussions imply. Galaxy also pushes back hard on the idea that Bitcoin developers are ignoring the issue. Owens writes that recent social media criticism has overstated the gap between public perception and actual technical work. Ethan Heilman, one of the co-authors of BIP 360, said the proposal has received “more comments than any other BIP so far in history of BIPs,” according to the report. It also cites two blunt remarks from active contributors: “Yes, developers are working on [quantum resistance]. I can point to many people working on this,” said Matt Corallo. Hunter Beast struck a similar tone: “We are working very hard on this very serious problem, and we think that it is the most serious concern that people have raised about Bitcoin.” The technical path forward is beginning to take shape. Galaxy highlights BIP 360, or Pay-to-Merkle-Root , as the leading protective proposal. The design would remove Taproot’s always-visible key-path spend and create a more quantum-resilient output structure via soft fork, reducing long-exposure risk without forcing Bitcoin to immediately choose a final post-quantum signature standard. From there, the conversation branches into harder territory. One layer is protection for future outputs. Another is mitigation for coins that are already exposed and may never migrate. That is where proposals like Hourglass enter the discussion. Rather than freezing vulnerable coins outright or allowing quantum-capable actors to sweep and dump them freely, Galaxy describes Hourglass as a “harm reduction” approach designed to limit the rate at which exposed coins could be extracted and sold during a quantum event. The report also surveys fallback and emergency ideas, including hash-based signatures such as SLH-DSA, Tadge Dryja’s commit/reveal design for a worst-case early CRQC scenario, and seed phrase zero-knowledge proofs for recovery and authentication. None solves the entire problem alone. Together, though, they suggest Bitcoin’s response is becoming broader and more concrete. Galaxy is careful not to understate the governance problem. Bitcoin upgrades remain slow by design, and the report points to the long timelines around SegWit and Taproot as reminders that even well-supported changes can take years. Still, Owens argues this threat is different. “There is no constituency,” he writes, “that benefits from Bitcoin being vulnerable to quantum attack.” That alignment of incentives may prove decisive if the risk becomes more immediate. Overall, Galaxy’s message is straightforward: the threat is serious, the debate is no longer theoretical, and the work to prepare for it is already underway. At press time, BTC traded at $70,360.
20 Mar 2026, 15:00
Dollar Strength Surges as Geopolitical Tensions Escalate – Scotiabank Warns of Market Volatility
BitcoinWorld Dollar Strength Surges as Geopolitical Tensions Escalate – Scotiabank Warns of Market Volatility TORONTO, March 2025 – The US dollar has demonstrated remarkable resilience in recent weeks, with Scotiabank’s latest analysis revealing a significant resurgence driven by escalating geopolitical tensions across multiple regions. This development marks a pivotal shift in global currency dynamics, potentially signaling broader economic implications for international trade and financial stability throughout 2025. Dollar Strength Returns Amid Global Uncertainty Scotiabank’s currency strategists have documented a clear pattern of dollar appreciation against major counterparts. The Dollar Index (DXY) has climbed approximately 3.2% over the past month, reaching levels not seen since late 2024. This movement represents a notable reversal from earlier predictions of dollar weakness. Market participants are increasingly seeking safe-haven assets, consequently driving demand for US Treasury securities and strengthening the greenback. Several key factors contribute to this trend. Firstly, renewed tensions in Eastern Europe have prompted capital flight from regional currencies. Secondly, Middle Eastern conflicts continue to disrupt energy markets, creating uncertainty that benefits traditional reserve currencies. Thirdly, trade disputes between major economies have intensified, further supporting dollar demand. Scotiabank’s research team emphasizes that these developments collectively create a perfect storm for dollar strength. Technical Analysis and Market Indicators Scotiabank’s technical charts reveal compelling patterns. The USD/JPY pair has broken through critical resistance at ¥152, while EUR/USD has tested support near 1.0650. These movements align with broader risk-off sentiment across global markets. Additionally, the bank’s proprietary models show increased correlation between geopolitical risk indices and dollar performance. This relationship has strengthened significantly since January 2025. Geopolitical Drivers of Currency Movements Current geopolitical developments provide crucial context for understanding currency fluctuations. Regional conflicts have escalated in several areas simultaneously, creating unprecedented uncertainty. Energy supply disruptions have particularly affected European currencies, while Asian currencies face pressure from regional security concerns. These conditions naturally favor the US dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency. Key geopolitical factors include: Renewed Eastern European tensions affecting EUR and regional currencies Middle Eastern conflicts impacting oil prices and petrocurrencies Asian territorial disputes influencing regional currency stability Global trade policy uncertainties affecting emerging market currencies Scotiabank’s geopolitical risk assessment framework indicates elevated levels across multiple regions. This framework analyzes political stability, conflict probability, and economic disruption risks. Current readings suggest sustained pressure on non-dollar currencies may continue through Q2 2025. Scotiabank’s Analytical Framework and Methodology The bank employs a comprehensive approach to currency analysis, combining quantitative models with qualitative assessment. Their methodology integrates real-time data from multiple sources, including government reports, market transactions, and geopolitical intelligence. This multi-faceted approach allows Scotiabank to identify trends before they become apparent in broader market data. Scotiabank’s currency research team, led by experienced analysts with decades of combined market experience, utilizes advanced statistical models. These models process vast amounts of data to identify correlations between geopolitical events and currency movements. The team’s findings consistently demonstrate that geopolitical tensions precede dollar strength by approximately 7-10 trading days. Historical Context and Comparative Analysis Historical data reveals similar patterns during previous periods of geopolitical uncertainty. For instance, the dollar strengthened significantly during the 2014 Crimea crisis and the 2022 Ukraine conflict. Current movements show comparable characteristics but with greater magnitude. This suggests markets may be pricing in prolonged geopolitical instability. A comparative analysis of major geopolitical events since 2000 reveals consistent patterns: Event Dollar Index Change Duration 9/11 Attacks (2001) +8.2% 3 months Global Financial Crisis (2008) +22.4% 6 months COVID-19 Pandemic (2020) +6.8% 2 months Current Period (2025) +3.2% (ongoing) 1 month Global Economic Implications and Market Impact Dollar strength carries significant implications for global economics. Emerging markets face particular challenges as dollar-denominated debt becomes more expensive to service. Additionally, commodity prices typically move inversely to the dollar, affecting resource-dependent economies. Global trade patterns may also shift as currency values change relative purchasing power. Central banks worldwide monitor these developments closely. Many have already adjusted monetary policy in response to currency movements. The Federal Reserve faces complex decisions balancing domestic inflation concerns against global financial stability. Scotiabank analysts suggest coordinated central bank interventions may become necessary if volatility escalates further. Sector-Specific Consequences Different economic sectors experience varying impacts from dollar strength. Export-oriented industries in non-dollar countries gain competitive advantages, while import-dependent sectors face cost pressures. Technology companies with global operations must manage currency translation risks. Energy markets experience complex interactions between dollar strength and commodity pricing. Conclusion Scotiabank’s analysis confirms that dollar strength has returned as a dominant market theme, primarily driven by escalating geopolitical tensions. This development carries profound implications for global currency markets, international trade, and economic policy. Market participants should prepare for continued volatility as geopolitical uncertainties persist. The dollar’s resurgence underscores its enduring role as the world’s primary safe-haven currency during periods of global uncertainty. FAQs Q1: What specific geopolitical events are driving current dollar strength? Multiple simultaneous developments contribute, including renewed Eastern European tensions, Middle Eastern conflicts affecting energy markets, Asian territorial disputes, and global trade policy uncertainties. Scotiabank’s analysis indicates these factors collectively create risk-off sentiment benefiting the dollar. Q2: How does Scotiabank measure the relationship between geopolitics and currency movements? The bank employs a proprietary geopolitical risk assessment framework that analyzes political stability, conflict probability, and economic disruption risks. This framework integrates with quantitative currency models to identify correlations and predictive patterns. Q3: What historical precedents exist for current dollar strength patterns? Similar patterns occurred during the 2014 Crimea crisis, 2022 Ukraine conflict, and other geopolitical events. Historical analysis shows geopolitical tensions typically precede dollar strength by 7-10 trading days, though current movements show greater magnitude. Q4: How does dollar strength affect emerging market economies? Emerging markets face challenges including more expensive dollar-denominated debt servicing, capital outflows, and imported inflation. Commodity-dependent economies experience additional pressure as dollar strength typically lowers commodity prices in dollar terms. Q5: What should investors monitor regarding future dollar movements? Key indicators include geopolitical developments, Federal Reserve policy decisions, global risk sentiment measures, and technical chart levels. Scotiabank recommends watching the Dollar Index (DXY) resistance at 106.50 and support at 103.80 for near-term direction. This post Dollar Strength Surges as Geopolitical Tensions Escalate – Scotiabank Warns of Market Volatility first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
20 Mar 2026, 12:45
Oil Supply Response Defuses Geopolitical Price Spike – OCBC’s Critical Analysis
BitcoinWorld Oil Supply Response Defuses Geopolitical Price Spike – OCBC’s Critical Analysis Global oil markets demonstrate remarkable resilience as coordinated supply responses effectively counterbalance recent geopolitical tensions, according to a comprehensive analysis from OCBC Bank. The Singapore-based financial institution’s latest research, published this week, provides crucial insights into how production adjustments and strategic reserves are preventing sustained price volatility. Consequently, traders and analysts are closely monitoring these developments for signs of long-term market stabilization. Oil Supply Response Mechanisms in Focus OCBC’s analysis highlights several key mechanisms currently tempering oil price spikes. Firstly, the United States continues its strategic petroleum reserve releases, adding substantial volumes to global markets. Additionally, OPEC+ members maintain their agreed-upon production increases, which they implemented earlier this quarter. Furthermore, non-OPEC producers like Brazil and Guyana are accelerating their output, contributing to overall supply growth. The International Energy Agency (IEA) recently confirmed these trends in its monthly report. Specifically, global oil supply increased by 1.4 million barrels per day in the last reporting period. This growth primarily came from non-OPEC+ countries. Meanwhile, commercial inventories in OECD nations rose for the third consecutive month. Therefore, the physical market shows clear signs of adequate supply. Key supply response factors include: Strategic petroleum reserve releases from major consuming nations Accelerated production from non-OPEC+ producers Increased OPEC+ output following quota adjustments Improved logistics and shipping efficiency Geopolitical Tensions and Market Reactions Recent geopolitical developments initially triggered concerns about supply disruptions. Notably, tensions in key shipping channels and production regions created anxiety among market participants. However, the actual impact on physical supply remained limited. OCBC’s research team meticulously tracked shipment data and production reports. They found that alternative routes and increased production elsewhere compensated for any localized disruptions. Historical data provides important context for current market behavior. For instance, similar geopolitical events in 2019 and 2022 caused more pronounced price reactions. During those periods, spare production capacity was significantly lower. Currently, several major producers maintain substantial spare capacity. This buffer allows them to respond quickly to unexpected supply shortfalls. Consequently, the market’s fundamental balance remains relatively stable despite headline risks. Expert Analysis from OCBC’s Energy Team OCBC’s senior energy analyst, Ms. Selena Ling, leads the research team behind this analysis. With fifteen years of commodity market experience, she emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between physical and paper markets. “The futures market often reacts more dramatically to geopolitical news,” Ling explains. “However, the physical market tells a different story. Our data shows actual cargo movements and inventory builds continuing uninterrupted.” The bank’s research incorporates real-time shipping data, official production statistics, and inventory reports from multiple jurisdictions. This comprehensive approach ensures high accuracy in their assessments. Moreover, OCBC maintains direct communication with industry participants across the supply chain. These connections provide valuable ground-level insights that complement statistical analysis. Market Dynamics and Price Formation Current oil price formation reflects complex interactions between multiple factors. While geopolitical risks contribute to volatility, fundamental supply and demand factors exert stronger influence. The forward price curve structure provides important clues about market expectations. Currently, the curve shows backwardation easing compared to previous months. This suggests traders anticipate improving supply conditions in coming quarters. Regional price differentials also offer insights into market dynamics. For example, Brent-WTI spreads have narrowed significantly. This indicates improved transatlantic arbitrage opportunities and better global supply distribution. Similarly, Dubai crude benchmarks show stable pricing relative to other markers. These technical indicators collectively support OCBC’s assessment of a well-supplied market. Recent Oil Market Indicators (Source: OCBC Research, IEA) Indicator Current Level Change vs. Last Month Global Oil Supply 102.4 mb/d +1.4 mb/d OECD Commercial Inventories 2,812 million barrels +18 million barrels OPEC+ Spare Capacity 3.2 mb/d Unchanged Brent-WTI Spread $2.10/barrel -$0.80/barrel Future Outlook and Risk Factors The medium-term outlook for oil markets depends on several evolving factors. Demand growth projections remain moderate, particularly given economic uncertainties in major economies. Meanwhile, supply growth continues from both conventional and non-conventional sources. Technological advancements in drilling efficiency contribute to this trend. However, several risk factors warrant careful monitoring. Potential supply disruptions remain the primary upside risk to prices. While current responses are effective, simultaneous disruptions in multiple regions could test the system’s resilience. Additionally, logistical bottlenecks could emerge if demand accelerates unexpectedly. On the demand side, economic slowdowns represent the main downside risk. Weaker-than-expected growth would reduce consumption projections and ease supply requirements. Policy developments also influence market dynamics. Climate policies and energy transition initiatives affect long-term investment decisions. However, their immediate impact on supply responses remains limited. Most analysts agree that conventional oil will remain crucial during the transition period. Therefore, supply responsiveness will continue to play a vital role in market stability. Conclusion OCBC’s analysis confirms that coordinated oil supply responses are successfully tempering geopolitical price spikes. The market demonstrates impressive resilience through strategic reserves, production adjustments, and improved logistics. While geopolitical risks persist, fundamental factors currently dominate price formation. Consequently, participants should focus on physical market indicators alongside geopolitical developments. This balanced approach provides the clearest understanding of actual market conditions and future price trajectories. FAQs Q1: What does “supply response” mean in oil markets? Supply response refers to actions taken by producers, governments, and market participants to increase available oil volumes. These actions include releasing strategic reserves, accelerating production, and improving distribution logistics to counter potential shortages. Q2: How do geopolitical events typically affect oil prices? Geopolitical events create uncertainty about future supply availability, often causing price spikes in futures markets. However, actual price impacts depend on whether physical supply is disrupted and how quickly alternative sources can compensate. Q3: What role does OPEC+ play in supply responses? OPEC+ coordinates production policies among major oil-exporting nations. The group can adjust output quotas to stabilize markets, and its members hold most of the world’s spare production capacity for emergency responses. Q4: How effective are strategic petroleum reserves in calming markets? Strategic reserves provide immediate additional supply during disruptions, typically calming markets within weeks. Their effectiveness depends on release timing, volume, and coordination among consuming nations. Q5: What indicators should traders watch for supply response effectiveness? Traders should monitor commercial inventory levels, shipping traffic data, production reports from key regions, and time spreads in futures markets. These indicators provide real-time evidence of physical market conditions. This post Oil Supply Response Defuses Geopolitical Price Spike – OCBC’s Critical Analysis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
20 Mar 2026, 11:05
Dark Defender Says XRP Is Compressing Into a Decision Point, States the Key Level to Watch
The cryptocurrency market often moves in cycles of chaos and calm, but the quiet phases tend to matter the most. XRP now sits in one of those moments. Price action has tightened, volatility has dropped, and the market appears to be holding its breath. These conditions rarely last. Instead, they usually precede a decisive move that defines the next phase of the trend. In a recent post on X, analyst Dark Defender drew attention to this exact setup. He explained that XRP is compressing within a descending triangle pattern on the 3-day chart, with a critical support level at $1.4047. This level now acts as the defining boundary between a potential breakout and a deeper continuation to the downside. Price Compression Signals Imminent Movement XRP’s current structure reflects a classic case of price compression. The asset continues to form lower highs while maintaining a relatively stable support base. This tightening range indicates that buyers and sellers are reaching equilibrium, but not for long. Hi all! #XRP is compressing into a decision point! Key level: $1.4047! If this holds, we likely see expansion. If it breaks, continuation opens below. This range won’t last long. I’ve mapped the full scenarios and probabilities in today’s analysis. pic.twitter.com/McXve9vQOd — Dark Defender (@DefendDark) March 19, 2026 Markets do not remain compressed indefinitely. As liquidity builds within a confined range, the eventual breakout often arrives with force. XRP’s position near $1.45 places it directly at the heart of this structure, making the current setup both timely and highly sensitive to any shift in momentum. The Importance of the $1.4047 Support The $1.4047 level serves as the most critical point in the current analysis. If XRP holds above this support, it strengthens the case for bullish expansion. Dark Defender’s projections suggest that a successful defense could push the price toward the $1.60–$1.62 region, where previous resistance zones exist. However, the structure remains fragile. If XRP breaks below this level with confirmation, the market could quickly shift direction. In that case, price may seek lower demand zones, with $1.21 emerging as a likely downside target based on recent technical formations. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Probabilities Favor a Breakout—But Not Without Risk The analysis assigns a higher probability—around 70%—to a bullish outcome. This outlook stems from XRP’s recent ability to defend key support levels despite broader market uncertainty. Still, the descending triangle pattern reflects persistent selling pressure, which keeps the downside scenario firmly in play. Price action from November 2025 through March 2026 supports this view. XRP has steadily tightened its range while volatility declined, a pattern that often precedes a breakout phase. A Defining Moment for XRP XRP no longer trends in a clear direction; it compresses into a decision point. That distinction matters. The market has reached a stage where indecision will soon give way to conviction. A strong hold above support could trigger a meaningful upward expansion . A breakdown could accelerate losses. Either way, the current range will not last long, and the next move will likely set the tone for XRP’s trajectory in the weeks ahead. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Dark Defender Says XRP Is Compressing Into a Decision Point, States the Key Level to Watch appeared first on Times Tabloid .
