News
31 May 2026, 09:02
Finance Expert Reveals the Biggest XRP Storm

A recent post on X by crypto enthusiast Sidney M Brewer has highlighted growing excitement among XRP supporters following comments associated with Morgan Stanley and the increasing involvement of major financial institutions in blockchain technology. Brewer argued that some of the world’s largest banks are already moving toward digital finance solutions, even as regulatory debates continue in the United States. In his post, Brewer referenced comments from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who stated that leading banks are integrating stablecoin payment rails, exploring tokenized assets, and expanding crypto-related services for clients. According to Brewer, these developments suggest that financial institutions are not waiting for every regulatory issue to be resolved before exploring blockchain-based infrastructure. The message resonated strongly with many XRP supporters, who view institutional adoption as a key factor in Ripple’s long-term strategy. The Biggest XRP Storm . THE SMARTEST BANKS ARE ALREADY ALL-IN ON CRYPTO As the market structure bill faces pushback, Brian Armstrong says leading banks aren’t waiting. They’re integrating stablecoin rails to move money faster and cheaper than SWIFT, tokenizing funds and… pic.twitter.com/d0k0rhIGTD — Sidney M Brewer (@Sidneybrewer_1) May 29, 2026 Morgan Stanley Discussions Capture Attention In the video attached to the post, Brewer explained that recent discussions connected to Morgan Stanley attracted significant interest because of the firm’s position as one of the world’s largest investment institutions. He said investors tend to pay close attention whenever a major financial company discusses topics such as blockchain technology, digital finance, tokenization, and financial modernization. Although XRP was not specifically mentioned in every discussion, Brewer noted that many members of the XRP community immediately linked the conversations to Ripple’s long-standing focus on improving cross-border payments and financial infrastructure. According to Brewer, XRP supporters believe that many of the ideas now being discussed by major financial institutions closely resemble concepts Ripple has promoted for years. These include faster settlement systems, lower transaction costs, reduced reliance on intermediaries, and more efficient international payments. Ripple’s Long-Term Institutional Focus Brewer emphasized that Ripple has consistently focused on utility-driven use cases rather than short-term market trends. He argued that while many cryptocurrency projects focus on retail speculation, Ripple dedicated substantial effort to building payment solutions and forming relationships with financial institutions. He said this distinction is one reason many XRP holders view the recent institutional interest in blockchain technology as significant. Supporters believe Ripple positioned itself early for a financial environment where tokenization, blockchain settlements, and digital asset infrastructure become increasingly common. Brewer also pointed to the growing conversation around tokenization . Financial institutions are exploring ways to represent traditional assets such as stocks, bonds, and real estate on blockchain networks. Many investors believe tokenization could improve efficiency and settlement speed across financial markets, creating new demand for liquidity solutions and cross-border payment technology. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Supporters Remain Optimistic Despite Challenges While expressing optimism, Brewer acknowledged that challenges remain. He noted that regulatory uncertainty, industry competition, and the slow pace of institutional change continue to create obstacles for widespread blockchain adoption. He also recognized that some analysts believe banks may ultimately prefer private blockchain systems over public digital assets. Others argue that evolving regulations could delay adoption timelines. Despite these concerns, Brewer maintained that the overall direction of the financial industry appears to be changing. He argued that the increasing willingness of major institutions to discuss blockchain infrastructure, digital settlements, and tokenized finance reflects a notable shift from the skepticism that existed only a few years ago. For many XRP supporters, the significance of the Morgan Stanley discussions extends beyond short-term market movements. Brewer concluded that investors are closely watching whether institutional adoption of blockchain technology continues to expand, believing that the long-term evolution of global finance could create opportunities for technologies focused on payments, liquidity, and financial efficiency. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Finance Expert Reveals the Biggest XRP Storm appeared first on Times Tabloid .
31 May 2026, 03:30
Google Engineer Makes $1.2M on Polymarket Using Confidential Search Data

A Google engineer is facing federal charges after prosecutors said he used confidential search data to make more than $1.2 million on Polymarket. The case puts new scrutiny on prediction-market rules and insider trading tied to private company information. Google Search Data Case Tests Polymarket’s Market-Integrity Rules Google software engineer Michele Spagnuolo was charged with
30 May 2026, 15:02
Software Engineer Reveals What Actually Sets XRP Price

Software engineer Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) posted an intriguing statement recently. He wrote, “The price of XRP is set by its VELOCITY.” He noted that understanding this requires research and admitted it took him some time. What Velocity Means in This Context Building on his analysis of how XRP can reach $300 , computer engineer CharuSan XRP (@CharuSan83) expanded on the idea. He addressed what he called “one of the biggest misconceptions in the XRP ecosystem right now.” The misconception centers on speed and circulation. Velocity, in this context, does not mean a single XRP token changes hands hundreds of times per day. The actual process involves a bank converting local fiat currency into XRP, the transaction validating on the XRP Ledger within 3-5 seconds , then converting back into local fiat on the receiving end to settle into the final account. CharuSan notes this cycle is “not instantaneous as commonly assumed.” Banking windows and correspondent bank approval processes add time to each cycle. Actually the price of XRP is set by its VELOCITY. Took me a minute to understand that, but the journey is well worth it. I can only tell you the destination, your research will uncover what this truly means. https://t.co/JuLtayZiB9 — Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) May 29, 2026 The Physical Ceiling on Velocity Global payment volume surges at specific hours, particularly when major financial markets overlap. The New York and London windows running concurrently produce peak transaction demand. The constraint here is physical, and the same token cannot occupy two different payment corridors simultaneously. CharuSan notes that this limits the realistic velocity coefficient to a maximum of 10 on a macro scale. That ceiling matters when calculating how much value XRP must carry to settle global transaction volume . If the token moves more slowly than theoretical models suggest, each token must carry more value per cycle. The price, therefore, reflects that load. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Why a Low Price Breaks the System CharuSan explained that $10-$20 would “trigger massive slippage, making the entire system completely unworkable.” Slippage occurs when transaction volume exceeds the available liquidity at a given price point. At low price levels, the token cannot absorb the settlement demand placed on it during high-volume windows without significant value loss. This connects velocity to the price in a functional way. The system requires sufficient per-token value to process simultaneous global settlements without degradation. As a result, XRP cannot remain cheap . In this system, XRP’s velocity is not a secondary metric. It is the mechanism through which price is determined. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Software Engineer Reveals What Actually Sets XRP Price appeared first on Times Tabloid .
30 May 2026, 13:42
Corporate blockchain payments face privacy risk as ZK tech grows

🚨 Blockchain payments are exposing corporate data, sparking privacy concerns. Zero-knowledge proof (ZK) technology can help shield sensitive details in $ETH transactions. 🕵️♂️ Critical data: AI-driven payments will boost on-chain privacy needs even further. Continue Reading: Corporate blockchain payments face privacy risk as ZK tech grows The post Corporate blockchain payments face privacy risk as ZK tech grows appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
30 May 2026, 05:31
Sui mainnet suffers two outages in two days as gas logic bug stalls transactions

The mainnet of Sui faced two interruptions in the span of just 48 hours due to a software issue with its v1.72 version, causing a problem in transactional activities and epoch transitions. According to the Sui Network’s official status update on X, the disruptions were traced to a gas accounting issue introduced in the v1.72 upgrade involving the interaction between the new Address Balances feature and existing gas fee logic. The failure affected validator consensus during epoch transitions, temporarily preventing transaction finality across the network. Sui stalls twice after v1.72 upgrade Sui first experienced a full mainnet stall on May 28, 2026, when a bug in the v1.72 release caused validators to stop processing user transactions. According to Sui’s status page, the outage lasted 5 hours and 55 minutes before service was restored after a coordinated validator upgrade exceeded the threshold required for recovery. The network resumed operations before stalling again on May 29 during an epoch transition process. Validators were unable to finalize a consistent network state, resulting in another interruption to transaction processing. Later on, Sui admitted that the second outage was as a result of the same core problem of how Address Balances works together with the gas fee structure. The team mentioned that the first solution was only temporary and failed to solve the clash. The outages occurred as a result of changes introduced by the v1.72 update. According to Sui, the new Address Balances feature unexpectedly interacted with existing gas accounting logic during epoch transitions, creating a consensus-level failure that prevented validators from agreeing on the next network state. Although validators remained online and continued internal system activity, they were unable to finalize user transactions until emergency fixes were deployed. During the first outage, the network remained stalled until more than two-thirds of staked validators upgraded their software and restored consensus. SUI price falls as users face delayed transactions Market data collected from large exchanges indicated that SUI was trading at around $0.91-$0.92 on May 29th, which translates to about a 7%-8% drop in price for the day. SUI price chart | Source: TradingView Trading activity increased during the outage as users reacted to halted network operations and delayed transaction confirmations. Though user balances stayed intact on the blockchain network, operations were interrupted, such as slow token transfers, paused DeFi transactions, and inability to transact NFTs and trade. The incidents highlighted execution risks for traders and DeFi users who rely on timely transaction settlement. Sui faces its second major disruption of 2026 The outages in May were the second time in the year Sui experienced a major network failure. During January 2026, there was a different kind of issue with the consensus that caused an outage lasting about five to six hours due to validators failing to validate new checkpoints. While the January and May incidents had different technical causes, both required coordinated validator intervention to restore normal operations. Sui confirmed on May 30 that the network had returned to normal operations after validators applied an emergency fix. According to the team, a full post-incident review will be published soon, outlining the interaction between the Address Balances feature and gas accounting during epoch transitions. Now, developers are observing if there is a need to redesign the feature, if gas accounting needs more separation from the consensus process, and what other measures are required to avoid such epoch transition issues in the future. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .
30 May 2026, 01:52
Bailey says UK banks still cannot access Mythos, blames US political hold-up

British banks still cannot access Anthropic’s Mythos model to test their systems against cyber threats, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said Friday, six weeks after the model first drew regulatory concern. Bailey said Anthropic was willing to share Mythos on a trial basis, but the rollout had stalled. “It hasn’t happened yet, and I think this has been somewhat caught up in the process with the U.S. administration,” Bailey said on the sidelines of the central banking conference in Reykjavik. Anthropic promised UK banks access in April, but it has not arrived As Cryptopolitan reported in April, the Bank of England, the Financial Conduct Authority, HM Treasury, and the National Cyber Security Centre convened to assess the risks Mythos posed to British financial institutions. At the time, Anthropic’s head of UK, Ireland, and Northern Europe, Pip White, said that UK banks would receive access to Mythos within the week. That was six weeks ago. Bailey named Mythos explicitly in an April 15 speech at Columbia University, describing it as a major cybersecurity concern and saying cyber had climbed regulators’ risk rankings faster than any other category in recent years. Mythos is currently limited to a select few companies through Anthropic’s Project Glasswing for cybersecurity applications. Early access was given to Goldman Sachs and a few other US companies. Cryptocurrency firms and UK banks have been left out of the first release. Bailey pushes for coordinated global response Bailey, who also chairs the international Financial Stability Board, said cyber threats cannot be contained within national boundaries. “Spillovers from this sort of cyber risk are so big that we can’t just have a single sort of national approach,” he said. Banks are deeply interconnected across borders, he added, meaning that one country securing its own institutions would not be enough if others remain exposed. Anthropic has said the model can find and exploit software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled human experts. When Anthropic released Mythos to select customers, the company said it had already found thousands of high-severity vulnerabilities across open- and closed-source software, more than 99% of which remained unpatched. In the hands of defenders, Mythos could let banks find and fix flaws before attackers reach them. Outside that circle, the same capability becomes a threat. The banks still waiting for access are exposed to a tool that their potential attackers may eventually obtain. Why the US administration sit in the middle Bailey’s comments come while Anthropic is also at odds with the Trump administration over military access to its AI tools. The dispute is about where to draw the line on how the U.S. military can use the company’s technology. President Donald Trump recently postponed signing an executive order on artificial intelligence that would have created a voluntary process in which developers could seek input from the federal government before making their advanced models public. That postponement adds another layer of uncertainty for companies and regulators seeking clearer rules around frontier AI systems. And for British banks, despite being flagged as exposed by their own central bank, remain on the outside of a tool that the Bank of England considers important enough to raise at an international conference. Anthropic has not publicly detailed the specific hold-up. The company said in April it was prepared to begin offering Mythos to British banks, with White citing “significant” engagement with UK bank chief executives since the model’s release. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .








































