News
8 May 2026, 11:50
Senator Warren Presses Meta on Stablecoin Plans, Cites Financial Stability Risks

BitcoinWorld Senator Warren Presses Meta on Stablecoin Plans, Cites Financial Stability Risks U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a prominent critic of the cryptocurrency industry, has escalated her scrutiny of Meta by demanding detailed answers from CEO Mark Zuckerberg regarding the company’s stablecoin initiatives. In a letter sent this week, Warren requested a response by May 20, outlining seven key areas of concern that range from the technical specifications of the stablecoin to its potential impact on the broader financial system. Warren’s Seven-Point Inquiry The letter, addressed directly to Zuckerberg, seeks clarification on the type of stablecoin Meta is piloting, the timeline for its public launch, and any modifications to the Meta Pay platform. Warren also requested details on contractual agreements with third-party issuers, as well as the company’s plans for user privacy protection and measures to prevent illicit financial activity. The senator’s office confirmed the letter was sent after Meta’s earlier announcement that it would offer a stablecoin option for paying some of its creators on its platforms. Financial Stability Concerns Warren warned that Meta’s adoption of a specific stablecoin, given its platform’s reach of approximately 3.5 billion users, could have significant implications for financial stability. This is not the first time Meta’s cryptocurrency ambitions have drawn regulatory attention. The company’s earlier Diem project (formerly Libra) was abandoned in 2022 after facing intense global regulatory pushback. The current initiative, while more limited in scope, has revived concerns about systemic risk and consumer protection. Broader Regulatory Context Warren’s letter arrives amid a broader U.S. regulatory push to oversee the rapidly growing stablecoin market. Lawmakers are currently debating the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act and other bills aimed at creating a federal framework for stablecoin issuers. Warren has previously called for stablecoin issuers to be treated as systemically important financial institutions, subjecting them to stricter oversight. Her latest move signals that she views Meta’s renewed stablecoin efforts as a potential test case for that approach. Conclusion Meta has not publicly responded to Warren’s letter, but the company’s past experiences with cryptocurrency projects suggest it will tread carefully. The outcome of this exchange could influence not only Meta’s stablecoin roadmap but also the broader regulatory landscape for digital currencies in the United States. For now, the cryptocurrency market and policymakers alike are watching closely to see how one of the world’s largest social media companies navigates the intersection of technology, finance, and regulation. FAQs Q1: What specific information is Senator Warren requesting from Meta? Warren’s letter asks for details on the type of stablecoin being piloted, the launch schedule, changes to Meta Pay, third-party issuer contracts, privacy protections, and measures to prevent money laundering and other illicit finance. Q2: Why is Senator Warren concerned about Meta’s stablecoin plans? Warren has warned that Meta’s vast user base of 3.5 billion people could amplify systemic risks if a stablecoin is widely adopted, potentially impacting financial stability if not properly regulated. Q3: What happened to Meta’s previous cryptocurrency project, Diem? Meta’s earlier Diem project (formerly Libra) was abandoned in 2022 after facing intense regulatory opposition from U.S. and European authorities over concerns related to monetary sovereignty, financial stability, and data privacy. This post Senator Warren Presses Meta on Stablecoin Plans, Cites Financial Stability Risks first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
8 May 2026, 11:40
IMF raises alert as advanced AI tools threaten global financial stability

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a warning regarding the danger being posed by the sophisticated nature of AI. In the IMF’s 7 May 2026 blog, newer AI models offer a pathway to bypass any financial guardrails put in place. To them, this would be disastrous to financial markets. The IMF has made clear that although the technology provides defense mechanisms to counter such attacks, its offensive capabilities outweigh its defensive strengths. The IMF highlights escalating AI cyber threats to financial stability This warning comes against the backdrop of growing dependence on technology such as shared infrastructure, including software and networks, that power payments and information transfer across the globe. In its report, the IMF warned that these risks cannot be viewed in isolation but are systemic and can spread from finance into other industries, such as energy and telecom. An important example cited is Claude Mythos Preview by Anthropic, a powerful AI model introduced in a carefully monitored environment. IMF further explained that Mythos can detect and use weaknesses in all major operating systems and web browsers, regardless of whether its operators possess any specific expertise. Such technology is a prelude to a future in which “zero-day” exploits—which have been difficult to create and exploit in the past—are common. The blog also mentioned OpenAI’s unique GPT-5.5 cyber model. Potential for systemic contagion and global market disruptions As the IMF states, the interconnection of global finance creates an exponential multiplier effect for global financial threats. As per the IMF, “Cyber risks are increasingly about correlated failures that could threaten financial intermediation, payments, and confidence at the systemic level.” This is because a few key platforms are used in cloud computing, software development, and machine learning. The report argues that AI can create further concentration and failure through a vulnerability affecting many institutions. Developing nations are vulnerable to cyberattacks due to limited resources and inadequate cyber protection measures. Though the IMF did not provide specific loss figures in its latest update, it cited earlier studies that highlighted the possibility of such events escalating into solvency issues and broader impacts. Urgent calls for global cooperation on AI financial risks As a countermeasure, the IMF is now promoting a “resilience-first policy framework” that views cybersecurity as an integral component of financial stability. “Defenses will always be penetrated at some point, and therefore resilience is important too, especially to prevent the spread of damage and ensure recovery,” the blog explained. IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva reinforced the message last month, stating in an interview: “We are very keen to see more attention to the guardrails that are necessary to protect financial stability in a world of AI.” White House scrambles all-of-government response to advanced AI risks The Trump Administration is making efforts to ensure that American companies and government institutions are shielded from cybersecurity risks arising from new artificial intelligence programs, according to National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, in an interview with Fox Business on Wednesday, May 6, 2026. Hassett appeared on Maria Bartiromo’s Mornings with Maria and stated that the White House is working with private firms to conduct extensive testing of new AI models before deployment. These statements follow concerns about the capabilities of Mythos , a top-notch AI model developed by Anthropic. “But we have scrambled an all-of-government effort and all the private sector to coordinate and to make sure that before this model is released out into the wild, that it’s been tested left and right to make sure that it doesn’t cause any harm to the American businesses or the American government,” Hassett stated. “We’re studying possibly an executive order to give a clear roadmap to everybody about how this is going to go and how future AIs that also potentially create vulnerabilities should go through a process so that, you know, they’re released in the wild after they’ve been proven safe, just like an FDA drug,” he explained. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
8 May 2026, 09:32
ASIC pushes brokers to boost cyber defenses against frontier AI risks

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) warns financial firms and market participants to step up cybersecurity protections as artificial intelligence continues to amplify cyber threats globally. It maintained that, while cyber threats have always been a concern, sophisticated AI tools like Claude Mythos could dramatically accelerate the discovery and exploitation of vulnerabilities. In an open letter, the regulator advised companies to secure their systems against AI-accelerated risks now rather than depend on future AI tools. Primarily, it advocated a technology-neutral, principles-driven approach to the urgently needed cyber upgrades. What does the ASIC expect from licensees across the country? Frontier AI has pushed cyber risk into a “new era,” cautioned ASIC Commissioner Simone Constant. She noted that, despite the potential perks of advanced AI models, they can still exploit vulnerabilities much faster than most anticipate. That means isolated gaps can now cause a total system collapse, with average attackers gaining access to high-level hacking techniques. This communication follows evidence from Connective that brokers are integrating AI tools without the necessary defensive frameworks. Connective chief executive Glenn Lees contended that the broker industry is currently buzzing with AI excitement but lacks the structure needed for secure, steady deployment. Nonetheless, he urged brokers to build a solid foundation of strategy, systems, and governance, asserting that this is probably the only way to make AI adoption work. ASIC’s open letter also asked licensees to address their security gaps now, rather than waiting to see how AI threats evolve. Constant explained that a ready-to-go response plan is essential, since the basic rules of cyber safety don’t change just because the technology does. She added that top-level management must take ownership, ensuring that rigorous testing and early remediation happen well before a threat becomes a crisis. She further commented, “The clock is at a minute to midnight – if you aren’t on top of your cyber resilience already, the time to act and prepare is right now.” Additionally, aside from the ASIC, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) cautioned banks that their governance and control measures for artificial intelligence are lagging behind the rapid expansion of AI tools . APRA member Therese McCarthy Hockey stated: “The AI revolution presents tremendous opportunities for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees to deliver improved efficiency and enhanced customer services. But we cannot be blind to the risks of such powerful technology.” ASIC took action against FIIG Securities The ASIC recently moved against Australian fixed-income specialist FIIG Securities Limited (FIIG) for failing to implement proper cyber safeguards for its massive client base for years. Consequently, the firm was directed to pay pecuniary penalties totaling $2.5 million and about $500,000 towards ASIC’s costs. Reportedly, FIIG’s security weaknesses played a role in the scale of a 2023 cyber breach that exposed confidential data, including tax file numbers, bank account details, and identification documents. About 18,000 clients received notice that their sensitive personal details may have been leaked. At the time, the FIIG even conceded that its cybersecurity arrangements were inadequate under its Australian Financial Services (AFS) license requirements and that better safeguards may have reduced the impact of the breach. By their own admission, the company also failed to follow its own policies designed to prevent exactly this kind of data leak. The Federal Court also mandated an independent audit to bring its cyber resilience up to a professional standard. Following the case’s outcome, ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court even commented, saying, “ASIC expects financial services licensees to be on the front foot every day to protect their clients. FIIG wasn’t – and they put thousands of clients at risk. In this case, the consequences far exceeded what it would have cost FIIG to implement adequate controls in the first place.” Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank .
8 May 2026, 09:13
Coinbase users locked out as outage stretches past five hours

Coinbase has been inaccessible for over five hours, citing cloud service problems. The trading and brokerage platform announced an unexpected outage, leading to liquidations and losses for users with open positions. Coinbase reported degraded performance, with its main site also going out at one point. According to the platform, the problems were due to overheating in one of its AWS cloud facilities. Coinbase experienced service disruptions due to increased temperatures in the affected Availability Zone (use1-az4) in the AWS US-EAST-1 Region. We will begin the process to re-enable trading on our markets shortly. All markets would be placed in “Cancel Only” mode before we… — Coinbase Support (@CoinbaseSupport) May 8, 2026 Users reported some orders were partially filled, or positions were liquidated without access to closing or selling. Later, the exchange managed to allow limited usage mode with ‘Cancel Only’ orders. Coinbase trading for BTC resumed after around six hours of total outages. | Source: Coinbase . As an immediate response, BTC fell to $79,333.53, following $366.83K in liquidations for the past hour, and $823.78K in the past four hours. Later, BTC resumed its rally as other markets took over during their most active hours. Coinbase lost over 35% of its trading volume in the past day, with $1.2B in total activity. BTC is heavily affected, as it makes up over a third of volumes on Coinbase . When will Coinbase reopen? Coinbase went through a period of degraded performance for over five hours. The latest update suggested trading may come back soon, with limited features at first. “ We will begin the process to re-enable trading on our markets shortly. All markets would be placed in “Cancel Only” mode before we move to re-enable trading,” announced Coinbase on its status page . During the outage, BTC trading stalled and users reported price disparities compared to other centralized exchanges. The recovery may take longer, as it depends on external factors. The delays also happened during a relatively volatile day for BTC, when the leading coin dipped below $80,000 once again. Coinbase is still the biggest US exchange, but has shown the risks of centralization and relying on external infrastructure. For now, AWS has not reported outages, but the problem revealed Coinbase may be reliant on a single physical destination for servers. The hard dependence of Coinbase on Amazon’s cloud service is seen as a major fault point, undermining the decentralized nature of crypto. Coinbase pressured by lowered crypto sentiment BTC trading on Coinbase has shown a lowered sentiment from US-based users. Since the end of April, BTC has mostly traded at a discount, with rare days of the typical Coinbase premium. As Cryptopolitan reported , the lowered sentiment coincided with a $394M net loss and missed earnings targets. Coinbase premiums weakened since the end of April, and most days saw BTC trading at a discount to other exchanges. | Source: CoinGlass . The generally slower crypto market may also be a factor behind the recent Coinbase layoffs. The co-founder and CEO of Coinbase sent out a message explaining the rationale behind the 14% layoffs. According to Armstrong, the layoffs were the results of a restructuring where fewer managers and higher AI usage made teams more agile. Armstrong also suggested some of the latest Coinbase code has been shipped by non-technical teams. Coinbase has turned into a hub for multiple activities, including institutional custody. However, previous data leak problems, frozen accounts, and lost access to funds have undermined trust in the platform. Your bank is using your money. You’re getting the scraps. Watch our free video on becoming your own bank
8 May 2026, 05:50
AI Restaurant Revolution: Marc Lore Reveals How Anyone Can Open a Virtual Restaurant in Under a Minute

BitcoinWorld AI Restaurant Revolution: Marc Lore Reveals How Anyone Can Open a Virtual Restaurant in Under a Minute Marc Lore, the veteran e-commerce entrepreneur who sold his previous startups to Amazon and Walmart, has unveiled a bold vision for the future of dining. His current venture, Wonder, plans to use artificial intelligence to let anyone open a restaurant in under a minute. This initiative, called Wonder Create, aims to democratize the restaurant industry by combining AI-powered design with a network of tech-enabled kitchens. How AI Restaurant Creation Works Wonder Create allows users to design and launch a virtual restaurant brand using an AI prompt. According to Lore, speaking at The Wall Street Journal’s “Future of Everything” conference, the process is simple. Users type in what kind of restaurant they want to build. The AI then generates the name, branding, description, pictures, pricing, health information, and all recipes in under a minute. This system operates like a “Shopify front-end with an AI prompt,” Lore explained. Users can refine their prompts if changes are needed. Once ready, the restaurant goes live across Wonder’s network of programmable cooking platforms. These are not traditional restaurants. They are all-electric kitchens that can operate as 25 different types of restaurants based on cuisine. Currently, Wonder has 120 such locations. The company expects to grow this number to 400 next year. Each kitchen has a 700-ingredient library and a staff of up to 12 people. Cooking tech, including conveyors and robotic arms, assists in the process. The company also just acquired Spice Robotics, a maker of an automatic bowl-making machine previously used by Sweetgreen. The Role of Robotics in AI Restaurants Wonder’s kitchens are becoming increasingly robotic. The company plans to introduce an “infinite sauce machine” next year. This machine can make about 80% of all sauces found in recipes on the internet today. Lore emphasized that adding robotics does not necessarily reduce headcount. Instead, it increases the number of meals a kitchen can produce. “We have about 7 million throughput capacity with 12 people,” Lore said. “We see a path to getting to 20 million throughput out of 2,500 square feet with just 12 people.” The long-term goal is to have 1,000 unique restaurants operating out of a single 2,500-square-foot location by 2035. Target Audience for AI-Powered Ghost Kitchens Wonder Create targets a wide range of users. Food entrepreneurs can test recipes and gauge customer reaction before opening brick-and-mortar locations. Social media influencers can connect with their audience through their own restaurant brands without launching physical chains. Lore mentioned that even private trainers, non-profits, or Disney for marketing a new movie could use the platform. “It could be a mega-influencer, a micro-influencer — anyone that wants to monetize their following,” Lore said. “Or it could be a private trainer that wants to make specific bowls. It could be a not-for-profit. Anybody can make a restaurant.” Challenges of Ghost Kitchens Whether that many people actually want to is an open question. Ghost kitchens had a rocky run in the early 2020s. Several high-profile operators scaled back or shut down after struggling to build customer loyalty. MrBeast Burger vividly illustrated the challenge. The brand faced widespread complaints over inconsistent food quality, a consequence of relying on dozens of different contracted kitchens and staff. Wonder’s added layer of automation and AI may address some of those pitfalls. Its programmable, increasingly automated kitchens are designed to solve exactly that problem. However, the model is still unproven at scale. There are still limits to this idea, Lore admitted. Wonder’s team and robots cannot do things like toss and stretch pizza dough or slice and roll sushi. Instead, the focus is on simpler basics like burgers, chicken wings, fried chicken, and bowls. Wonder’s Business Model and Acquisitions The whole plan comes together with Lore’s other acquisitions. Wonder acquired Grubhub for its 250 million deliveries per year business. It also bought Blue Apron for its meal kit business. Now, Wonder is focused on buying restaurant brands, like New York City-based Blue Ribbon Fried Chicken, which it snapped up for $6.5 million in February. “When you buy a brand — and you can buy a brand that has 10 locations, or even 50 locations — and then overnight put it in 1,000, there’s just an incredible arbitrage there,” Lore noted. This strategy allows Wonder to scale popular brands rapidly across its network. Comparison with Traditional Restaurant Models Feature Traditional Restaurant Wonder Create AI Restaurant Setup Time Months to years Under a minute Initial Investment High (rent, equipment, staff) Low (software subscription) Kitchen Type Brick-and-mortar Programmable cooking platform Scalability Slow, location-dependent Instant across network Menu Flexibility Limited by kitchen equipment 700-ingredient library Impact on the Food Industry This development could reshape the food industry. It lowers the barrier to entry for aspiring restaurateurs. It also allows established brands to test new concepts without risk. The AI handles all the operational details, from menu creation to pricing. This could lead to a surge in niche and experimental cuisines. However, experts caution that quality control remains a challenge. The success of these AI-powered ghost kitchens will depend on consistency. Wonder’s robotic kitchens aim to solve this by standardizing the cooking process. The company’s investment in automation suggests a long-term commitment to this vision. Future of AI in Cooking Lore’s vision extends beyond just restaurants. He sees AI and robotics transforming how we think about food preparation. The infinite sauce machine is just one example. Future innovations could include fully automated cooking systems that handle complex dishes. The goal is to increase efficiency while maintaining quality. “By 2035, to have 1,000 unique restaurants operating out of the 2,500 square feet,” Lore added. This level of density would be impossible without AI and robotics. It represents a fundamental shift in the economics of the restaurant industry. Conclusion Marc Lore’s Wonder Create platform represents a significant leap in the use of AI in the restaurant industry. By allowing anyone to open an AI restaurant in under a minute, it democratizes access to the food business. The combination of AI-driven design, robotic cooking platforms, and a vast ingredient library offers a scalable solution to the challenges faced by traditional ghost kitchens. While the model is still unproven at scale, Wonder’s strategic acquisitions and focus on automation position it as a potential game-changer. The future of dining may well be powered by AI, and Wonder is leading the charge. FAQs Q1: How does Wonder Create use AI to open a restaurant? Users type a description of their desired restaurant into an AI prompt. The AI generates the name, branding, menu, pricing, and recipes in under a minute. The virtual restaurant then launches across Wonder’s network of kitchens. Q2: Who can use Wonder Create to start an AI restaurant? Anyone can use it, including food entrepreneurs, social media influencers, private trainers, non-profits, and even movie studios for marketing campaigns. The platform is designed to be accessible to all. Q3: What are the limitations of Wonder’s robotic kitchens? The kitchens cannot perform complex tasks like tossing pizza dough or slicing sushi. They focus on simpler items like burgers, chicken wings, fried chicken, and bowls. The ingredient library includes 700 items. Q4: How does Wonder ensure food quality across its network? Wonder uses programmable, increasingly automated kitchens with robotic arms and conveyors. This standardizes the cooking process, reducing the inconsistency that plagued earlier ghost kitchen models like MrBeast Burger. Q5: What is Wonder’s long-term goal for its AI restaurant network? Wonder aims to have 1,000 unique restaurant brands operating out of a single 2,500-square-foot kitchen by 2035. The company plans to expand its network to 400 locations next year, up from 120 currently. This post AI Restaurant Revolution: Marc Lore Reveals How Anyone Can Open a Virtual Restaurant in Under a Minute first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
8 May 2026, 03:24
Stablecoins evolve from crypto trading tools into global payment infrastructure

Stablecoins are emerging as one of the most closely watched developments in global finance, as banks, payment firms, and technology companies explore blockchain-based alternatives to traditional payment rails. Once mainly used by traders moving funds between cryptocurrency exchanges, stablecoins are now expanding into cross-border remittances, merchant settlements, treasury management, and machine-to-machine payments. The shift is happening as businesses seek cheaper alternatives to conventional banking infrastructure, where international transfers can take days to settle and involve multiple intermediaries. According to a16z crypto’s April 24 report , stablecoin transfer volume reached $4.5 trillion in the first quarter of 2026, with usage increasingly tied to payments rather than speculative trading. Why payment firms are leaning in Industry executives say the appeal lies in continuous settlement and lower operational costs. Financial infrastructure provider Finzly notes that stablecoins can streamline cross-border payments by settling continuously on blockchain networks instead of depending on banking hours and correspondent chains. Retail Banker International reports that stablecoins are slowly entering real-world commerce as merchants test blockchain-based settlement. Large payment and technology firms are positioning themselves around the trend. Reuters reported in January that Visa continues exploring stablecoin settlement infrastructure. “You still have to come back and connect to the existing merchant acceptance ecosystem,” Visa’s head of crypto Cuy Sheffield told Reuters. AI agents are the new use case Technology companies are also testing stablecoins for AI-powered commerce. The Block reported that Amazon Web Services is working with Coinbase and Stripe to support USDC payments for AI agents, allowing autonomous software systems to transact without relying on conventional banking rails. As Cryptopolitan reported , AWS AgentCore Payments uses the x402 open payment protocol with settlement times of about 200 milliseconds on Base at less than a fraction of a cent per transaction. Warner Bros. Discovery, Cox Automotive, Thomson Reuters, and PGA TOUR are among enterprises exploring or already using AgentCore. The International Monetary Fund’s 2026 working paper “Stablecoins and the Future of Payments” said stablecoins could improve payment efficiency, particularly in countries with underdeveloped financial infrastructure. Regulators warn about monetary sovereignty The Bank for International Settlements said international coordination on stablecoin oversight remains “critically important,” warning fragmented regulation may create opportunities for regulatory arbitrage. The BIS has cautioned that widespread use of dollar-backed stablecoins could weaken monetary sovereignty where citizens may prefer digital dollars over local currencies. Gita Gopinath, a Deputy Managing Director at the IMF, warned in a 2025 Financial Times interview that emerging markets face rising risks from “disintermediation of their financial institutions” and “currency substitution.” Governments respond with frameworks Governments are responding through regulation rather than restrictions. The U.S. GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, established a framework for dollar-backed stablecoins with reserve and compliance requirements. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Reuters in April there was a “tremendous opportunity for a yuan stablecoin,” predicting China could roll one out within three to five years. Researchers say stablecoins still face hurdles around fraud protection, transaction reversibility, and consumer safeguards. Still, analysts view them as a developing layer of internet-native financial infrastructure that could reshape how money moves globally. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

















































