hodler

6 May 2026, 19:12

Nvidia'S stock rose ~5.39% to $207.09, bringing the market cap back to $5 trillion

Shares of Nvidia jumped around 5.39% to close at $207.09, bringing the chip company’s total worth back near the $5 trillion mark for the first time since geopolitical tensions sent markets tumbling earlier this year. The graphics processor manufacturer last touched this valuation level before stock prices fell during market turbulence tied to the Iran conflict in early 2026. Wednesday’s rally puts Nvidia back among a small group of companies worth $5 trillion. Nasdaq futures gained more than 1% as news emerged of progress on a peace agreement with Iran, while oil prices dropped sharply. Nvidia shares climbed over 5% on Wednesday This combination of events tends to benefit fast-growing technology companies like Nvidia that trade at high price-to-earnings multiples. Nvidia’s current market value stands at $5.05 trillion, keeping it as the world’s most valuable company. Corning partnership secures optical infrastructure To strengthen its position, Nvidia announced a $500 million investment in Corning, the company that makes fiber-optic cables. The deal includes two types of warrants that give Nvidia the right to buy Corning stock. A filing with securities regulators shows Nvidia received a warrant to purchase up to 15 million Corning shares at $180.00 each, plus another warrant for 3 million more shares at just $0.0001 per share. Corning’s stock jumped roughly 14% after the news broke. Beyond the financial arrangement, Corning committed to a major expansion of its American production facilities. The glassmaker will increase its U.S. optical-connectivity manufacturing by ten times its current size, construct three new factories in North Carolina and Texas, and hire more than 3,000 workers for well-paying positions. Jensen Huang said in a statement: “AI is driving the largest infrastructure buildout of our time, and a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reinvigorate American manufacturing and supply chains. Together with Corning, we are inventing the future of computing with advanced optical technologies, building the foundation for AI infrastructure where intelligence moves at the speed of light.” The Corning deal represents the third piece of a supply chain strategy Nvidia started in March. That month, the company put $4 billion into Coherent and Lumentum, two businesses that make laser components for Nvidia’s Spectrum-X co-packaged optics system. Competition heats up in AI processor market While Nvidia works to secure its suppliers, rivals are gaining ground in the chip market. As Cryptopolitan reported earlier , AMD saw its shares rise about 5% after reporting better-than-expected results. The company earned $1.37 per share on an adjusted basis and told investors to expect stronger sales ahead. AMD also said it anticipates growing demand for central processing units as these chips take on more work in artificial intelligence applications. At the same time, major technology companies are developing their own processors to reduce reliance on Nvidia. Anthropic PBC plans to spend roughly $200 billion with Alphabet over five years, following Alphabet’s decision to sell its tensor processing unit chips to certain clients. Amazon.com Inc. said its Trainium custom AI chips have secured more than $225 billion in future revenue agreements. Meta is also getting ready to use chips it designed in-house. Bill Stone, who oversees investments at Glenview Trust Company, pointed out the risk Nvidia faces: “The problem with having basically 100% market share is that there’s only one direction for it to go, and it certainly seems like these companies could be credible competitors.” Still, Nvidia hasn’t lost much market position yet. The company controlled 86% of the AI accelerator market in 2025, the same percentage it held in 2024. Supporters of the stock argue that AI demand remains so high that multiple companies can succeed. Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft together expect to spend up to $725 billion this year on data centers and equipment, and these four customers make up about 45% of Nvidia’s total sales. Nvidia will report its first-quarter earnings on May 20 , which investors see as an important test of whether the company can maintain its lead. The May earnings report will offer a clearer look at how these massive infrastructure investments are impacting the company’s bottom line. Investors will likely monitor how shifting geopolitical tensions continue to affect market stability. If you want a calmer entry point into DeFi crypto without the usual hype, start with this free video.

6 May 2026, 19:10

Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026: 3 Days Left for 50% Off Second Ticket – What to Know

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026: 3 Days Left for 50% Off Second Ticket – What to Know Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026, one of the year’s largest gatherings for startup founders, investors, and technology leaders, is set to take place October 13–15 at San Francisco’s Moscone West. Organizers are offering a limited-time promotion: buy one full-price pass and receive 50% off a second ticket of the same type. The offer expires May 8 at 11:59 p.m. PT. What the event offers Now in its annual iteration, Disrupt brings together more than 10,000 attendees for three days of sessions, roundtables, and startup showcases. The event features six dedicated stages covering topics such as artificial intelligence, fintech, climate tech, biotech, and hardware. More than 250 tactical sessions are scheduled, along with 300+ startups exhibiting their products. The main stage, known as the Disrupt Stage, hosts top founders, investors, and operators discussing market trends and strategic insights. Other stages include the Builders Stage, focused on scaling companies; the AI Stage, examining practical AI applications; and stages dedicated to smart money, smart systems, and real-world AI applications in robotics and biotech. Why the BOGO offer matters The buy-one-get-one-50%-off promotion is designed to encourage attendees to bring a co-founder, partner, or colleague. Organizers note that having a second person at the event can amplify networking opportunities and reinforce a company’s presence across multiple conversations and contexts. The discount applies to the same ticket type for both passes. After May 8, standard pricing resumes. The offer is available only for a limited window, and organizers emphasize that the cost of attending without a companion increases not only financially but also in terms of missed opportunities for visibility and credibility building. What attendees can expect Beyond sessions, Disrupt provides structured networking environments. Investors, venture capitalists, and media representatives attend specifically to discover new startups and evaluate emerging technologies. The event has historically served as a launchpad for companies seeking funding, partnerships, or media coverage. San Francisco’s Moscone West, a central venue for major tech conferences, offers ample space for both formal presentations and informal meetings. The event runs from morning to evening each day, with multiple tracks running simultaneously. Context and background Bitcoin World Disrupt has been a recurring event in the tech calendar, drawing participation from early-stage startups to established companies. Previous editions have featured keynotes from prominent figures in venture capital, AI research, and fintech. The 2026 edition comes amid a period of increased investor interest in AI applications, climate technology, and decentralized finance. The event also includes a startup competition, where selected companies pitch to a panel of judges for prizes and potential investment. Registration for the competition typically closes weeks before the main event. Conclusion For founders and operators considering attendance at Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026, the current promotion offers a financial incentive to bring a second team member. With the May 8 deadline approaching, the decision hinges on whether attending with a companion can meaningfully increase the return on investment in terms of networking, credibility, and business development. The event itself remains a significant fixture in the startup ecosystem, providing concentrated access to decision-makers across technology sectors. FAQs Q1: How does the 50% off second ticket offer work? A: When you purchase one full-price pass, you can add a second ticket of the same type at 50% off. The discount is applied at checkout. The offer ends May 8, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Q2: What ticket types are eligible for the BOGO discount? A: The promotion applies to the same ticket type for both passes. Specific eligibility details are available on the registration page. The discount does not apply to VIP or add-on packages unless explicitly stated. Q3: Can I transfer my ticket if I cannot attend? A: Ticket transfer policies vary by ticket type. Generally, passes can be transferred to another individual up to a certain date before the event. Check the terms and conditions at the time of purchase for exact rules. This post Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026: 3 Days Left for 50% Off Second Ticket – What to Know first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

6 May 2026, 18:45

Inside the 2017 meeting that drove Elon Musk out of OpenAI, according to Greg Brockman’s testimony

BitcoinWorld Inside the 2017 meeting that drove Elon Musk out of OpenAI, according to Greg Brockman’s testimony In late August 2017, a small group of OpenAI cofounders gathered to decide the future of the nonprofit research lab. The meeting, described in detail by OpenAI president Greg Brockman during recent trial testimony, marked the beginning of a rift that would ultimately lead to Elon Musk’s departure from the organization and a bitter legal battle that continues today. Musk’s demand for control According to Brockman, Musk arrived at the meeting demanding “unequivocal” control of the company. The SpaceX and Tesla founder had just given each of his cofounders a Tesla Model 3, which Brockman interpreted as an attempt to win their support at a time when Musk and Sam Altman were competing for control over the company’s direction. OpenAI’s head of research, Ilya Sutskever, had commissioned a painting of a Tesla as a friendly gesture for Musk. The conversation quickly soured. When Musk was told the others would not accede to his demand for control, Brockman testified that Musk became angry and upset. After sitting in silence for several minutes, Musk said, “I decline,” then stood up and stormed around the table. Brockman said he thought Musk was going to hit him. Musk grabbed the painting and began to leave, turning back to ask, “When will you be departing OpenAI?” The for-profit dilemma The inciting incident for the dispute was a milestone: an OpenAI model had defeated the top human player in the video game DOTA II. Brockman said this convinced everyone that computing power was the key to creating powerful AI tools, but that fundraising purely as a nonprofit would be insufficient. That realization led to discussions about creating a for-profit subsidiary. Musk wanted full control of the for-profit entity, at least initially. The other founders proposed equal shares, with additional equity for cash investments. Another idea involved connecting OpenAI to Tesla’s AI work. Shivon Zillis, an OpenAI advisor who acted as a go-between, said there were more than 20 variations on the plan. But when the other founders refused to give Musk control, the partnership unraveled. “It should not be the case that there exists one person with full and absolute control over OpenAI,” Brockman testified. Brockman’s journal entries revealed During his two days of testimony, Brockman frequently referenced a personal journal that offered rare insight into the internal dynamics. Musk’s lawyers seized on entries where Brockman discussed whether to remove Musk from the board. In one November 2017 entry, Brockman wrote: “Can’t see us turning this into a for-profit without a very nasty fight… [I’m] just thinking about the office and we’re in the office. and his story will correctly be that we weren’t honest with him in the end about still wanting to do the for profit just without him… btw another realization from this is that it’d be wrong to steal the non-profit from him. to convert to a b-corp without him. that’d be pretty morally bankrupt. and he’s really not an idiot.” Brockman explained that the entry reflected whether to try to remove Musk from the board—something they ultimately did not do. Musk left voluntarily in February 2018, concluding that “OpenAI is on a path of certain failure” and saying he planned to focus more on AI at Tesla. The legal battle escalates Musk stopped his regular donations to OpenAI’s operating budget after the meeting, though he continued paying for office space the company shared with Neuralink until 2020. In 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit entity and raised $1 billion from Microsoft, followed by an additional $13 billion over the next four years. Those deals fueled Musk’s suspicions that Altman and Brockman had gotten one over on him, leading him to file his lawsuit in 2024. OpenAI’s lawyers have argued that Musk had the same for-profit plan in mind, while Musk’s legal team claims Altman and Brockman “stole a charity.” The trial, which began in May 2026, has included dramatic moments, including a text message Musk sent Brockman two days before the trial began: “By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America. If you insist, so it will be.” The jury won’t see that message, but Musk’s lawyers have worked to realize its spirit. Brockman’s wealth questioned During cross-examination, Steve Molo, Musk’s lead trial attorney, questioned Brockman about his personal wealth. Brockman acknowledged that his current stake in the company is worth nearly $30 billion. Molo demanded: “Why you didn’t take the $29 billion more than the billion you said you would be good with, and donate that to the charity?” Brockman responded: “Look at what we accomplished. The OpenAI non-profit has over $150 billion of OpenAI equity value. That is something we have built through hard work, blood, sweat and tears, all this time since Elon has left.” Molo also focused on emails where Brockman said he would donate $100,000 to OpenAI—a donation he never made. Brockman, ironically, is best known to the public for making the largest donation of the 2025 political cycle: $25 million to MAGA Inc., a SuperPAC supporting President Donald Trump, though that did not come up in the trial. Why this matters The trial offers an unprecedented look at the internal dynamics of one of the most important technology companies in the world. The outcome could determine not only the financial future of OpenAI but also the governance model for AI development. The case has broader implications for how nonprofit research organizations transition to for-profit entities, a question that will become increasingly important as AI development requires massive capital investment. The trial is expected to continue through next week, with Sam Altman yet to testify. Whatever the outcome, the 2017 meeting that Brockman described has already become a defining moment in the history of artificial intelligence. FAQs Q1: What was the main reason Elon Musk left OpenAI? According to Greg Brockman’s testimony, Musk left because the other cofounders refused his demand for “unequivocal” control of the for-profit entity they were planning to create. Musk wanted full control, while the others proposed equal shares and equity proportional to cash investments. Q2: What did Greg Brockman’s journal entries reveal about the dispute? Brockman’s journal entries showed his internal conflict about whether to remove Musk from the board to move forward with the for-profit plan. He ultimately decided against it, and Musk left voluntarily in February 2018. Musk’s lawyers have used the entries to argue that Brockman and Altman acted deceptively. Q3: What is the current status of the lawsuit? The trial began in May 2026 and is expected to continue through the following week. Musk’s legal team claims Altman and Brockman “stole a charity,” while OpenAI’s lawyers argue that Musk had the same for-profit plan in mind. The jury will decide whether OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit entity was legitimate or constituted a breach of fiduciary duty. This post Inside the 2017 meeting that drove Elon Musk out of OpenAI, according to Greg Brockman’s testimony first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

6 May 2026, 17:40

SpaceX and xAI consider up to $119 billion ‘Terafab’ chip factory in Texas with Intel’s help

BitcoinWorld SpaceX and xAI consider up to $119 billion ‘Terafab’ chip factory in Texas with Intel’s help SpaceX, Elon Musk’s aerospace company that now houses his artificial intelligence venture xAI, is evaluating a massive investment of up to $119 billion to build a semiconductor manufacturing facility in Grimes County, Texas. The project, internally referred to as ‘Terafab,’ would be a vertically integrated chip fabrication plant designed to produce advanced semiconductors for AI servers, satellites, autonomous vehicles, and robotics. According to a proposal filed on the Grimes County website, the initial phase of construction could cost approximately $55 billion. The document describes a ‘multi-phase, next-generation, vertically integrated semiconductor manufacturing and advanced computing fabrication facility.’ What is the Terafab project? Musk has publicly outlined the Terafab as a response to what he describes as a critical shortage of advanced chips needed for his companies’ expanding AI and robotics ambitions. The facility is expected to produce enough chips to deliver one terawatt of power per year — a figure that underscores the enormous scale of the planned operation. ‘We either build the Terafab or we don’t have the chips, and we need the chips, so we build the Terafab,’ Musk wrote in a social media post, emphasizing the urgency behind the project. The initiative brings together several Musk-led companies, including SpaceX, xAI, and Tesla, with chipmaking giant Intel contributing technical expertise and manufacturing know-how. The collaboration aims to develop chips tailored for a range of applications: AI servers powering xAI’s Grok model series Satellite communications for SpaceX’s Starlink network Space-based data centers proposed by SpaceX Autonomous driving systems for Tesla vehicles Humanoid robots under development at Tesla Texas location not yet final Despite the filing in Grimes County, Musk clarified in a post on Wednesday that Texas is only one of several locations under consideration. The final site selection remains open, though the state has become a growing hub for semiconductor manufacturing, partly due to incentives from the federal CHIPS and Science Act. Grimes County, located northwest of Houston, offers significant land availability and a business-friendly regulatory environment, factors that likely influenced its inclusion in the proposal. Why this matters for the AI and chip industries The Terafab project reflects a broader trend among major technology companies to secure their own chip supply chains, reducing dependence on external foundries such as TSMC and Samsung. For Musk, the investment is a strategic move to ensure xAI has sufficient computing power to train and deploy its Grok AI models, which require massive amounts of data center capacity. Musk has also cited the potential of space-based data centers as a key reason for merging xAI with SpaceX. The combined entity, reportedly valued at $1.25 trillion, is expected to go public in June, providing additional capital for ambitious projects like the Terafab. Industry analysts note that the $119 billion figure, while enormous, reflects the escalating costs of leading-edge semiconductor fabrication. Building a single advanced chip plant can cost upwards of $20 billion, and the Terafab’s multi-phase approach could span years or even decades. Conclusion SpaceX and xAI’s proposed Terafab represents one of the largest industrial investments ever contemplated in the United States. If realized, it would reshape the domestic semiconductor landscape and provide Musk’s companies with a dedicated chip supply for AI, space, and automotive applications. However, the project remains in the proposal stage, with location and final investment levels still subject to change. The coming months, particularly around the planned IPO of the combined SpaceX-xAI entity, will offer clearer signals on whether this ambitious vision moves from paper to production. FAQs Q1: What is the Terafab? The Terafab is a proposed vertically integrated semiconductor manufacturing facility that would produce advanced chips for AI, satellites, autonomous vehicles, and robotics. It is a joint effort between SpaceX, xAI, Tesla, and Intel. Q2: How much will the Terafab cost? The initial phase is estimated at $55 billion, with total spending potentially reaching $119 billion over multiple phases, according to a filing on the Grimes County, Texas website. Q3: Is the Terafab location confirmed? No. While a proposal was filed in Grimes County, Texas, Elon Musk has stated that Texas is only one of several locations under consideration. A final decision has not been announced. This post SpaceX and xAI consider up to $119 billion ‘Terafab’ chip factory in Texas with Intel’s help first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

6 May 2026, 15:50

Match Group Slows Hiring to Fund AI Tool Expansion as Tinder Shows Signs of Recovery

BitcoinWorld Match Group Slows Hiring to Fund AI Tool Expansion as Tinder Shows Signs of Recovery Match Group, the parent company of dating apps including Tinder, reported a slight uptick in Tinder’s revenue in its first-quarter earnings, marking a potential turnaround after several quarters of decline. However, a more significant narrative emerged from the earnings call: the company is deliberately slowing its hiring to reallocate funds toward expanding internal use of artificial intelligence tools. Why Match Group Is Slowing Hiring During the call, Match Group CFO Steven Bailey explained that the company is making a major push to become what he called an “AI-native company.” This involves giving every employee access to cutting-edge AI tools and providing training to integrate them into daily workflows. Bailey acknowledged that these tools come with significant costs, and to offset them, the company is reducing its hiring plans for the remainder of the year. He assured investors the move would be cost-neutral, with lower headcount expenses balancing the increased software spending. The company also expects that improved employee productivity from AI use will eventually drive revenue growth. This strategy is not unique to Match Group. Across the tech industry, companies are increasingly weighing the costs of AI adoption against traditional hiring. However, Match Group’s explicit linking of hiring freezes to AI spending provides a clear case study of how corporate priorities are shifting. Tinder’s Modest Recovery Amid Broader Challenges Tinder’s performance offered a glimmer of hope. Monthly active users declined by 7% in March, an improvement from the 10% drop a year earlier. Registrations grew for the first time since 2024, albeit by only 1%. While these numbers suggest the decline may be slowing, analysts caution that the uptick could be driven by temporary curiosity around new features, such as in-real-life (IRL) events, rather than a sustained recovery. Match Group’s overall revenue for the first quarter reached $864 million, up 4% year-over-year. However, the company’s guidance for the next quarter is weaker, projecting revenue between $850 million and $860 million, which would represent a decline of up to 2% year-over-year. This mixed outlook underscores the persistent headwinds the dating app industry faces. The Generational Shift Away from Dating Apps A key factor behind these struggles is a growing disinterest among younger users, particularly Gen Z, in traditional dating apps. This generation is increasingly seeking lower-pressure ways to connect, such as through shared hobbies, running clubs, book groups, or other in-person activities. This trend aligns with a broader cultural shift toward analog experiences, including the resurgence of film cameras, flip phones, and other nostalgic technology. Match Group’s CFO, Rascoff, acknowledged this shift during the earnings call, stating that Gen Z wants to connect but finds traditional dating apps “intimidating” and “highly structured.” In response, the company is adapting its roadmap by expanding its own IRL events, aiming to create lower-stakes environments for meeting new people. What This Means for the Industry and Workers The decision to slow hiring in favor of AI investment raises broader questions about the future of work in tech. While Match Group frames this as a productivity-enhancing move, it also reflects a reality where companies are prioritizing software over headcount. For workers, this trend could mean fewer job openings, even as companies claim AI will create new roles. The situation at Match Group is a microcosm of a larger debate about whether AI will ultimately replace jobs or augment them. For investors, the key takeaway is that Match Group is betting on AI to drive efficiency and revenue growth, but the near-term outlook remains uncertain. The company’s ability to balance cost savings from hiring freezes with the need for innovation will be critical in determining whether Tinder’s turnaround is genuine or fleeting. Conclusion Match Group’s decision to slow hiring to fund AI tools is a strategic move that reflects both the opportunities and costs of technological adoption. While Tinder shows early signs of recovery, the broader challenges of declining user engagement and generational shifts remain. The company’s focus on AI and IRL events suggests a recognition that the dating app market is evolving, but whether these investments will pay off is yet to be seen. FAQs Q1: Why is Match Group slowing hiring? Match Group is slowing hiring to reallocate funds toward expanding internal use of AI tools for employees. The company expects the cost savings from lower headcount to offset the increased software expenses. Q2: Is Tinder recovering? Tinder’s revenue slightly increased in the first quarter, and the decline in monthly active users slowed compared to a year ago. However, the company’s next-quarter guidance suggests revenue could decline, indicating the recovery is fragile. Q3: How is Gen Z changing dating app usage? Gen Z is increasingly seeking lower-pressure ways to connect, such as through in-person hobbies and events, rather than traditional dating apps. Match Group is responding by expanding its own IRL events to adapt to this trend. This post Match Group Slows Hiring to Fund AI Tool Expansion as Tinder Shows Signs of Recovery first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

6 May 2026, 15:45

Microsoft could abandon 2030 clean energy for AI data centers target

Microsoft is reconsidering its 2030 goal of ensuring all its data centers are powered via renewable, clean energy, as the financial and energy costs of building AI infrastructure strain climate commitments made before the current arms race began. The company’s internal discussions center on whether to delay or abandon its “100/100/0” target, an initiative announced in 2021 that pledged to match 100% of its electricity consumption, 100% of the time, with zero-carbon energy in a bid to fully rely on renewable energy for its data centers.No final decision has been made by the company; however, it is no surprise that this is being considered, as the costs of AI services have continued to ramp up in the last year. Why Microsoft could abandon its pledge The tension is straightforward: Microsoft , Amazon, and Alphabet are collectively spending hundreds of billions of dollars to build more data center capacity for AI services. Some of those facilities are expected to consume multiple gigawatts of power, with a single gigawatt sufficient to power approximately 750,000 U.S. homes .Microsoft has been adding approximately one gigawatt of data center capacity every three months. That pace makes the proposed hour-by-hour renewable matching far more expensive and logistically difficult than the annual matching target the company already meets. The hourly commitment was always considered a stretch internally, according to people familiar with the program.Carbon emissions across the sector are moving in the wrong direction. In their most recent sustainability reports, Meta, Alphabet’s Google, Amazon, and Microsoft disclosed emissions increases of 64%, 51%, and similarly steep figures .“In the race to get data centres up and running as soon as possible, clean energy targets are out of the window,” said Alexia Kelly, former director of net zero and nature at Netflix and now managing director of the carbon policy and markets initiative at High Tide Foundation, “Gas seems to be the fuel of choice.” Why natural gas reigns supreme The growing reliance on natural gas to power AI infrastructure represents a direct trade-off against climate targets. Industry executives have argued that gas is faster and easier to deploy than renewables .Microsoft has pursued nuclear energy as one alternative, agreeing in 2024 to a power deal with Constellation Energy to help restart a unit of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. But nuclear projects operate on long timelines, and the demand for AI compute is accelerating significantly in the present.Microsoft continues to invest in data center expansion globally. In April, the company announced a set-aside $329 million for cloud infrastructure and AI capabilities in South Africa, including improvements in energy and water readiness. The contrast between these ongoing investments and the potential backsliding on commitments to clean, renewable energy points to a priority shift across the tech sector: ensuring power supply first, before worrying about its source. Kenya Microsoft project suspension signals real-world limits The energy strain from AI services is not theoretical. Kenya suspended a $1 billion data center project backed by Microsoft and UAE-based G42 after President William Ruto determined the country lacked sufficient power capacity to support it .Kenya’s installed electricity capacity sits at roughly 3,000 megawatts. The proposed facility, planned for a site about 100 kilometers northwest of Nairobi, would have required approximately a third of that supply. “To switch on that one data centre, we would need to shut off power for half the country. That’s when I knew there was a problem,” Ruto said.The project, first announced during Ruto’s state visit to Washington in May 2024, was intended to run largely on geothermal energy and deliver Azure cloud services to businesses and government institutions. A concept note prepared by Kenya’s technology ministry failed to receive funding clearance from the National Treasury, effectively halting progress. By August 2025, more unfruitful meetings between Kenyan officials and Microsoft executives signaled the project would miss its original May 2026 completion date. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .