hodler

29 Apr 2026, 11:31

Ripple CEO Drops Fresh Bombshell Statement That Stuns XRP Army

Brad Garlinghouse, the chief executive of Ripple, has reiterated the company’s strategic direction in a brief response on X. His comment came as a direct reply to a leadership-focused post by Alexis Ohanian, who emphasized that CEOs should communicate their organization’s guiding vision. Ohanian’s original statement stressed that a chief executive must continuously define and reinforce a “North Star” for their company. In his words, this responsibility is not occasional but constant, requiring repetition and clarity over time. Garlinghouse responded concisely, expressing full agreement before linking Ripple’s guiding principle directly to XRP. He wrote, “100% All roads lead back to Ripple’s North Star, XRP.” 100% All roads lead back to Ripple’s North Star, $XRP . https://t.co/z7cWxoQN1H — Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) April 28, 2026 Context From Ohanian’s Leadership Perspective In the video accompanying his post, Ohanian elaborated on the challenges of maintaining consistent communication within growing organizations. He explained that one of the most difficult aspects of leadership is repeatedly conveying a company’s broader vision to both existing and new team members. According to him, founders and CEOs must restate their narrative, even as it evolves, to maintain alignment across the organization. He noted that each new hire adds additional complexity, making communication more difficult to maintain at scale. Ohanian described this process as similar to a “telephone” effect, where messages can shift as they pass through layers of a team. He added that advances in software and artificial intelligence are enabling companies to build smaller, more efficient teams, which in turn increases the importance of precise and consistent communication. Ohanian also highlighted that organizations with tighter communication structures tend to operate more cohesively. He suggested that clearer messaging contributes to stronger coordination and more unified execution across teams. Garlinghouse’s Position on Ripple’s Direction Garlinghouse’s response reflects a direct application of Ohanian’s principle. By identifying XRP as Ripple’s “North Star,” he framed the digital asset as the focal point of the company’s mission. In an earlier Times Tabloid report , Garlinghouse emphasized XRP’s role as the “North Star” for the company’s operations. Garlinghouse explained that every decision, from acquisitions to product development, ultimately aligns with advancing the XRP ecosystem and demonstrating its utility to financial institutions worldwide. Garlinghouse’s recent statement doubles down on the narrative that connects Ripple’s activities, including its payment solutions and partnerships, back to XRP . We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Community Reaction and Broader Interpretation Following the exchange, at least one user on X echoed Garlinghouse’s sentiment, stating that Ripple’s vision has consistently centered on utility, adoption, and real-world value, while expressing optimism about XRP’s future trajectory. This reaction reflects a segment of the community that interprets Ripple’s messaging as aligned with long-term growth and practical use cases. Overall, the interaction highlights how executive communication, even in brief formats, can reinforce strategic priorities. Garlinghouse’s response aligns with the idea that effective leadership requires consistent and focused communication, particularly in industries where clarity of purpose shapes perception and direction. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ripple CEO Drops Fresh Bombshell Statement That Stuns XRP Army appeared first on Times Tabloid .

29 Apr 2026, 10:33

EMURGO Expands Cardano Ecosystem by Acquiring Ctrl Wallet, ADA Rises

EMURGO announced today, April 29, 2026, that it has acquired Ctrl Wallet for multichain access. Cardano users can now interact across blockchains. ADA price shows slight upward movement. EMURGO, one of the founding organizations behind the Cardano blockchain, announced today, April 29, 2026, on social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) that it has officially taken over Ctrl Wallet, a well-known multichain crypto wallet. This move indicates that the current focus of founding organizations is towards making crypto easier and more connected for its users. This deal has not come up overnight but it has been a result of a partnership that began somewhere in mid-2025, when EMURGO started working with Ctrl Wallet so that it could improve how Cardano connects with other blockchains. Now, by bringing Ctrl wallet under its control, EMURGO wants to build stronger tools for users who deal with multiple cryptocurrencies across different networks. From Partnership to Full Integration Originally, Ctrl Wallet (which was previously known as XDEFI) has made a name for itself as a flexible and user-friendly wallet. It allowed people to store, send, and manage crypto assets across more than 2,300 different blockchain networks. That’s a big deal because most wallets are limited to just one or a few blockchains. EMURGO saw this as an opportunity. Cardano has always aimed to go above and beyond its own ecosystem and connect with other networks such as Ethereum and Bitcoin . However, doing this requires a strong infrastructure, and that’s where Ctrl Wallet came into picture. When these two first partnered in 2025 (EMURGO and Ctrl Wallet), the goal was to make it easier for Cardano users to interact with assets and apps outside the Cardano network. Over time, the partnership deepened. Developers worked on the technical integrations, and users were slowly introduced to multichain features. Now, with this full acquisition, EMURGO is taking over the control of that entire technology. Instead of relying on an external partner, it can now build and improve everything in-house. What This Means for Users? If the users are already using Ctrl Wallet, then they will observe that most of the core features have been kept as they are. The users will be able to manage assets across multiple blockchains, and the wallet’s technology is not going anywhere. However, there will be a shift in branding and direction. Over time, Ctrl Wallet’s features are expected to be integrated into EMURGO’s broader ecosystem. One major part of this is the future evolution of the Yoroi Wallet into something called the “SecondFi” applications. SecondFi is EMURGO’s vision for a next-generation finance app. The main idea is to create a single platform where users can manage all their crypto assets, perform transactions, and access decentralized finance (DeFi) tools, without needing multiple apps. Another important point to note is that the acquisition does not include the $CTRL token. EMURGO has made it very clear that it is only interested in the wallet technology and not the token that is tied to it. This means that the token will continue to exist separately and it will not be directly managed by EMURGO. Why Multichain Matters? To understand why this move is important, we will have to look at the bigger picture. The world of crypto is currently divided into n number of blockchains and each one of them has its own set of rules, tokens and applications. For users, this can be confusing, if they want to use apps on different blockchains, they usually need separate wallets, tools and processes. Moving assets from one network to the other is also at times complicated and risky. This is where the “multichain” solution comes into the picture. A multichain wallet such as Ctrl allows the user to manage everything in one place. The user does not have to switch between apps or worry about technical details as much. By acquiring Ctrl Wallet, EMURGO is betting on a future where users expect seamless movement between blockchains, just like switching between apps on your phone today. Faster Development and Better Tools Another big benefit of this acquisition is speed. When companies rely on external partners, there are chances that the development slows down as there are a lot of things that are to be coordinated. By bringing Ctrl Wallet in-house, EMURGO can move faster. This means quicker updates, better features and tighter integration with Cardano-based apps. Features like cross-chain swaps (exchanging one crypto for another across different networks) and smoother asset transfers could become easier and more reliable. For developers building on Cardano, this also opens new possibilities. They can create apps that interact with assets from multiple blockchains, making their products more useful and appealing. Cardano’s Bigger Vision This move fits into Cardano’s long-term plan where it is focuses on building a strong foundation first and then chasing the short-term hype. While this approach has sometimes made it seem slower compared to other projects, it has also helped Cardano build a solid and secure system. One key part of it is the Voltaire era, which aims to introduce community-led governance, which means more control is given to the users and the stakeholders in deciding how the network evolves. Market Context As this acquisition news was announced, Cardano (ADA) showed small gains. As press time, the price of ADA 2.61% token stands at $0.2499 with an uptick of 1.29% in the last 24-hours as per CoinMarketCap. ADA 24-hours chart It is important to understand that this acquisition is something that is not likely to cause an immediate price jump. Instead, it is a long-term development aimed at improving the ecosystem. Cardano has faced pressure like much of the crypto market in the recent past. But it has also shown signs of stability, partly due to steady buying from large investors (usually known as ‘whales’). This suggests that while short-term price movements may remain uncertain, but the underlying development activity is still strong. Also Read: Cardano Names Foundation as Catalyst Manager, ADA Holds $0.24

29 Apr 2026, 08:22

Ripple’s Patent Ensures SWIFT Cannot Replicate XRP. Here’s What You Need to Know

Crypto researcher SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) posted about Ripple’s intellectual property position, sharing documents that support a direct conclusion. Ripple’s XRPL patent blocks rivals from developing comparable blockchain software. As a result, SWIFT cannot replicate the XRP Ledger. The only viable option, according to SMQKE, is integration with Ripple’s technology. The document shared alongside the post gives that conclusion real support. RIPPLE’S XRPL PATENT BLOCKS RIVALS FROM DEVELOPING COMPARABLE BLOCKCHAIN SOFTWARE Swift cannot replicate the XRP Ledger. The only viable option is to integrate Ripple’s technology. Documented. https://t.co/jCp5HyEfB3 pic.twitter.com/iJVAtBcyc9 — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) April 27, 2026 What the Document Shows The excerpts appear to come from an analysis of blockchain patents in the payments sector. They cover Ripple’s patented RippleNet system, a blockchain-based cross-border payment network. RippleNet allows banks and financial institutions to conduct international transactions faster and at lower cost than traditional methods. The contrast with conventional SWIFT payments is significant. Ripple’s system cuts transaction times from days to seconds . That performance gap draws serious attention from institutions seeking efficiency. The document addresses the patent question directly. By securing a patent for its technology, Ripple guarantees exclusive rights to its payment system, prohibiting rivals from using comparable blockchain networks without authorization. The Importance of Ripple’s Patent Patents in financial technology carry real competitive weight. A patent does not just protect a product. It forces competitors to navigate legal barriers before building anything similar. In Ripple’s case, that barrier applies directly to cross-border blockchain payment infrastructure. This protection is important for XRP. The digital asset powers Ripple’s payment system , and no competitor can legally replicate RippleNet’s architecture, which keeps the network’s utility tied to Ripple’s ecosystem and XRP. Institutions that want blockchain-based international settlement have a narrow path, and that path runs through XRP. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 The Integration Argument SMQKE makes clear that SWIFT cannot simply build what Ripple has built. The patent makes it legally complex. The alternative SMQKE identifies is integration. This shifts the conversation from whether Ripple replaces legacy systems with XRP , or whether those systems adopt its technology to stay relevant. XRP is no longer a challenger waiting for adoption. It is the infrastructure that financial networks will need to access. The patent protection locks that position in place. Ripple controls the technology, and others must engage with its ecosystem to use it. For XRP holders and institutional observers, this is worth paying attention to. Ripple’s patent is a structural advantage that actively shapes how the cross-border payments space develops, and it ensures that XRP will play a prominent role in the global financial system . Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ripple’s Patent Ensures SWIFT Cannot Replicate XRP. Here’s What You Need to Know appeared first on Times Tabloid .

29 Apr 2026, 08:03

Hedera Africa Hackathon crowns winners in record global showdown

The Hashgraph Association, a Swiss based non profit advancing digital enablement, innovation, and education across the Hedera ecosystem, and Exponential Science, an organization focused on supporting emerging technologies to advance human progress, have announced the winners of its Hedera Africa Hackathon, which has officially become the largest hackathon globally. More than 13,000 developers, 1,300 project submissions, and 45,000 certification participants across 20+ African hubs participated in the Hedera Africa Hackathon. The winning projects focused on building real infrastructure projects on top of Hedera Technology. These solutions included route payments across incompatible networks, verified renewable energy certificates, and secure medical records against silent or unauthorized alteration. The $1 million prize pool, among the largest ever awarded at a Web3 hackathon, co funded by The Hashgraph Association, and Exponential Science, was distributed across four thematic tracks, alongside a cross-track championship recognizing the strongest projects overall. In addition to the success of the hackathon, The Hashgraph Association also formed an Investment Committee, which will make multi-million-dollar commitments in strategic partnerships, expanding the ecosystem’s global footprint and emphasis on emerging markets. This committee positions Hedera as one of the few ecosystems directly supporting builders with capital, mentorship, and enterprise pathways. 2025 Hedera Hackathon winners used Hedera DLT across four tracks Hackathon developers created scalable, real-world solutions tailored to the continent’s most urgent challenges using Hedera’s DLT across four tracks: On-Chain Finance & Real-World Assets, Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) for Operations, Immersive Experiences, and AI & DePIN. The hackathon also included partnerships with Orange Digital Center and was operated by Dar Blockchain. Commenting on the win, the team behind Carboni Renewable Energy Certificate Platform said, “We’re honored that the judges endorsed our vision for rebuilding renewable energy reporting and financing, and excited to turn this win into a real service on Hedera that supports the 1.5-degree goal.” The Cross-Track Champions were selected for exceptional innovation, execution, and real-world impact across all categories: 1st Place ($100,000): GreenAfrica (Nigeria) – Environmental verification platform enabling transparent tracking of sustainability initiatives. 2nd Place ($70,000): Carboni Renewable Energy Certificate Platform (Egypt) – Infrastructure for proving and trading verified renewable energy credentials. 3rd Place ($60,000): Effisend X Africa (Mexico) – AI-powered payment routing layer connecting incompatible African payment rails. 4th Place ($40,000): Silsilat Finance (Malaysia) – Cross-border settlement infrastructure for emerging markets. 5th Place ($30,000): Beyond Service (Nigeria) – Mobile game with persistent digital identity and asset ownership. The winners by track are: On-Chain Finance & Real-World Assets: Silsilat Finance (Malaysia). Direla (South Africa). Upesa (Nigeria). Tedera (Romania). Nia (Madagascar). DLT for Operations: Carboni Renewable Energy Certificate Platform (Egypt). Building a Chain of Trust in the Green Power-to-X Market (USA). RDZ Health (Zimbabwe). Afiya (Nigeria). W.A.T.A (Brazil). Immersive Experiences: Beyond Service Game (Nigeria). Cryptonia CITY (Nigeria). KeyRing (USA). CryptoMage (India). AI & DePIN: Effisend X Africa (Mexico). GreenAfrica (Nigeria). Hedron (Morocco). APIx: Intelligent Web3 Deployment Layer (Ivory Coast). Speaking on the success of the hackathon, Kamal Youssefi, President of the Hashgraph Association, noted that the Hedera Africa Hackathon reached historic heights, scaling the depths of talent and ambition across the continent and beyond with the online participants. He added that Hedera has a longstanding commitment to enabling global innovation and powering real utility, proven by the applications built this year spanning finance, sustainability, AI and DePIN verticals. On the investment committee, he explained that it would nurture these developers long after the hackathon ends, empowering the next generation of builders. The hackathon will return in 2026, with additional details on location, tracks, and partners to be released at a later date. Dr. Paolo Tasca, Chairman at Exponential Science, explained that any strong, innovative, and responsible technical ecosystem begins with education, and that through this initiative, people have seen that approach materialize at scale, with participants advancing from learning to the development of meaningful infrastructure. The Hedera Africa Hackathon included partners such as Sygnum Bank, Orange Digital Centers, and the Nairobi Securities Exchange, as well as Shamba Records, Hashgraph Online, and Swisscoast, alongside ecosystem and institutional partners Taylor Wessing, Rearden Digital Assets, and Object Computing, Inc. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

29 Apr 2026, 06:10

Here’s How Litecoin (LTC) Contained a Massive MWEB Exploit

Litecoin experienced a significant disruption tied to its MimbleWimble Extension Block (MWEB) privacy layer after a critical validation flaw was discovered and exploited across two separate incidents in March and April 2026, according to a post-mortem shared by developer David Burkett. The issue originated from a bug in how MWEB inputs were validated during block connection, which allowed a miner to include malformed metadata that did not match the actual unspent transaction output being referenced. This enabled an attacker to construct a block where a relatively small input appeared to justify a much larger withdrawal, known as a pegout, from the MWEB system. Timeline of MWEB Crisis Interestingly, a chain scan revealed that the vulnerability had already been exploited in March at block height 3,073,882, where an attacker generated an inflated pegout of over 85,000 LTC. The funds were initially moved to a transparent address and split across three outputs, which were quickly temporarily frozen by miner-enforced consensus rules. Developers privately worked with major mining pools to prevent further exploitation and released a series of emergency updates to enforce stricter validation rules while preserving network stability. The attacker later cooperated after being contacted and signed a recovery transaction that returned the majority of the funds, while retaining 850 LTC as a negotiated bounty. That shortfall was covered separately by Litecoin creator Charlie Lee, and the full recovered amount was pegged back into MWEB . The resulting output was permanently frozen to restore internal balance. No confirmed user funds were lost in the March incident, though the response relied heavily on rapid miner coordination and controlled software rollouts. A second incident in April exposed additional complications when another actor attempted to reuse the same exploit path. Although updated nodes correctly rejected the malformed block, the handling of mutated MWEB block data caused certain upgraded mining nodes to stall or become unable to continue normal operations. This particularly affected block submission processes. As a result, unupgraded miners continued extending an invalid chain, which grew to 13 blocks before upgraded participants coordinated to restore the valid chain, which ended up triggering a deep reorganization. This reorg removed the invalid blocks, but not before some third-party systems processed transactions from the bad chain. External services were impacted, including swaps conducted through NEAR-related infrastructure and THORChain, where assets exchanged on the invalid chain no longer existed after the reorg. Losses tied to these transactions are still being assessed. Litecoin Core v0.21.5.4 The root cause of the April issue was linked to how nodes handled mutated MWEB data tied to identical block hashes, which could interfere with later valid block processing. This behavior has since been addressed in Litecoin Core version 0.21.5.4, which makes sure that corrupted block data is discarded to allow proper validation of subsequent blocks. Developers also introduced several fixes to strengthen MWEB accounting, enforce correct validation at all stages, and prevent similar denial-of-service or chain-splitting scenarios in the future. The post Here’s How Litecoin (LTC) Contained a Massive MWEB Exploit appeared first on CryptoPotato .

29 Apr 2026, 01:20

Elon Musk OpenAI Trial: Testimony Reveals Shattered Friendship with Larry Page Over AI Safety Fears

BitcoinWorld Elon Musk OpenAI Trial: Testimony Reveals Shattered Friendship with Larry Page Over AI Safety Fears Elon Musk took the stand Tuesday in his ongoing lawsuit against OpenAI. His testimony revealed a deeply personal motivation behind co-founding the company. It was not just about charity or control. It was about a broken friendship with Google co-founder Larry Page. Musk testified that a falling out over AI safety directly led him to create OpenAI. This testimony offers a rare, sworn account of a pivotal moment in tech history. The trial is taking place in San Francisco, California, as of April 28, 2026. The Core Disagreement Over AI Safety Musk recounted a specific conversation with Page. He raised the prospect of artificial intelligence wiping out humanity. Page reportedly dismissed this concern. He said it would be ‘fine’ as long as AI itself survived. Page then called Musk a ‘speciest’ for being ‘pro human.’ Musk described this attitude as ‘insane.’ This fundamental disagreement on AI safety became a driving force for Musk. He believed a non-profit was needed to develop AI responsibly. This belief directly contradicted Page’s apparent indifference to human survival. From Close Friends to Legal Adversaries The two men were once extremely close. Fortune magazine included them on its 2016 list of secretly best-friend business leaders. Musk was so comfortable with Page that he regularly crashed at his Palo Alto home. Page once told Charlie Rose he would rather give his money to Musk than to charity. Their friendship did not survive the founding of OpenAI. When Musk recruited Google AI star Ilya Sutskever in 2015, Page felt personally betrayed. He subsequently cut off all contact with Musk. This personal rift is now central to a major legal battle. Musk’s Testimony Under Oath This is not the first time Musk has told this story. He previously shared it with author Walter Isaacson for his bestselling biography. However, Tuesday was the first time he said it under oath. This legal context adds significant weight to his claims. Page has not commented on the testimony. It is important to remember that everything Musk said serves his lawsuit. He is painting a picture of his original intentions for OpenAI. He wants to prove the company has strayed from its non-profit, safety-focused mission. The Lawsuit’s Core Arguments Musk’s lawsuit alleges that OpenAI abandoned its original charter. He claims the company now prioritizes profit over safety. He argues that its partnership with Microsoft violates its non-profit status. The charity he claims was stolen from him is a key part of this argument. He wants the court to force OpenAI to return to its open-source, safety-first roots. The testimony about Page serves to establish Musk’s original, pure intentions. It frames OpenAI’s current trajectory as a betrayal of that founding vision. Background on the Musk-Page Friendship The relationship between Musk and Page was once legendary in Silicon Valley. They shared a vision for the future of technology. Both were obsessed with grand, world-changing ideas. Their friendship was built on mutual respect and late-night conversations. They discussed everything from space travel to artificial intelligence. The breakdown over AI safety was a direct clash of these worldviews. Page saw AI as the next step in evolution. Musk saw it as an existential threat to humanity. This philosophical divide proved unbridgeable. Timeline of a Fractured Relationship Early 2000s: Musk and Page become friends through Silicon Valley networks. 2014-2015: Musk grows increasingly concerned about AI risks. He discusses them with Page. 2015: Musk co-founds OpenAI as a non-profit. He recruits Ilya Sutskever from Google. Post-2015: Page ends their friendship. The two men rarely speak again. 2023: Musk tells Lex Fridman he wants to patch things up. He says, ‘We were friends for a very long time.’ 2026: Musk testifies under oath about the falling out during his OpenAI trial. Expert Analysis and Implications Legal experts note that personal testimony can be powerful in court. It humanizes a complex corporate dispute. However, it does not prove the legal claims of the lawsuit. The court must still decide if OpenAI violated its contract or fiduciary duties. The testimony does highlight the deep divisions within the AI community. The debate over AI safety versus rapid development remains unresolved. This trial is forcing these private disagreements into the public record. It provides a unique window into the minds of tech leaders. Impact on the AI Industry The outcome of this trial could have major implications. It might set a precedent for how AI companies are governed. It could force OpenAI to restructure its relationship with Microsoft. It may also influence public trust in AI development. The story of the Musk-Page friendship adds a human element to these high-stakes issues. It shows that personal relationships can shape the direction of entire industries. The trial is a reminder that the future of AI is not just about technology. It is also about the people who build it. Conclusion Elon Musk’s testimony in the OpenAI trial has revealed a deeply personal motivation. His falling out with Larry Page over AI safety was a core reason for founding the company. The testimony provides a sworn account of a pivotal moment in tech history. It highlights the philosophical divide between two of the world’s most influential figures. The trial continues to unfold in San Francisco. Its outcome will likely shape the future of artificial intelligence development. The story of a broken friendship now sits at the center of a landmark legal case. FAQs Q1: What is the main reason Elon Musk testified about his friendship with Larry Page? Musk testified to explain his core motivation for co-founding OpenAI. He wanted to show the court that his primary concern was AI safety, not profit. The story about Page establishes his original, safety-focused intentions for the company. Q2: What was the specific disagreement between Musk and Page over AI? Musk testified that he raised the concern that AI could wipe out humanity. Page reportedly said that would be ‘fine’ as long as AI itself survived. Page then called Musk a ‘speciest’ for being ‘pro human.’ Q3: Has Larry Page commented on Musk’s testimony? No. Larry Page has not commented on the testimony. It is important to note that Musk’s account is presented in service of his lawsuit against OpenAI. The court will weigh the evidence presented. Q4: How did the friendship between Musk and Page end? The friendship ended after Musk recruited Google AI star Ilya Sutskever to help launch OpenAI in 2015. Page felt personally betrayed by this move and subsequently cut off all contact with Musk. Q5: What is the broader significance of this testimony for the AI industry? The testimony highlights the deep divisions within the AI community over safety versus rapid development. It brings private disagreements into the public record. The trial’s outcome could set a precedent for how AI companies are governed. This post Elon Musk OpenAI Trial: Testimony Reveals Shattered Friendship with Larry Page Over AI Safety Fears first appeared on BitcoinWorld .