hodler

4 May 2026, 16:02

Ex-Ripple CTO: Why Is XRP Not Already $20 If There’s Even a 1% Chance of $10K?

Crypto analyst Steph Is Crypto (@Steph_iscrypto) has drawn attention to recent comments from Ripple’s former Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, about XRP’s price potential and Ripple’s strategy. The comments have put Schwartz at the center of a heated debate about the $10,000 XRP price . A user asked Schwartz to weigh in on the theory based on Chris Burniske’s crypto valuation formula, and many in the community did not appreciate Schwartz’s answer. Schwartz applied basic expected value logic to the $10,000 thesis. He explained that if wealthy investors genuinely believed there was even a 1% chance of XRP reaching $10,000 within a decade, market forces would have already pushed the price to at least $20 . As XRP trades well below that level, Schwartz used the gap to challenge the theory’s credibility. CRAZY: David Schwartz says “If there’s even a 1% chance of $10K XRP… why isn’t it already $20?” pic.twitter.com/xtMN5SvdxU — STEPH IS CRYPTO (@Steph_iscrypto) May 1, 2026 Ripple Is Not Sitting on a Price Switch A follow-up comment pushed further, suggesting Ripple could use its own products, Ripple Prime and Ripple Treasury, to drive XRP above $100. Schwartz rejected the premise. He acknowledged that there may have been a time when it was plausible to argue Ripple was holding back some mechanism to dramatically increase XRP’s price , waiting for the right moment. He said that the argument is very difficult to make today. Schwartz stated that Ripple has been open about what it is doing and why. He added that while the company is not transparent about everything, it is not concealing any grand conspiracy. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 The Bigger Picture on Regulatory Clarity In a clip shared by Steph, Schwartz outlined Ripple’s position on crypto legislation. He expressed support for securing regulatory clarity now through the CLARITY Act , even if the resulting bill is imperfect. He described Ripple’s strategy as enterprise adoption first, with retail expansion to follow. He sees that path mirroring how the internet developed, starting with government and corporate users before reaching everyday consumers. Schwartz acknowledged that some in the industry, including Coinbase and Charles Hoskinson, have threatened to oppose legislation that does not meet their standards. He gave them the benefit of the doubt, suggesting this may be a negotiating posture rather than a firm position. The goal, in his view, is to secure the best possible bill without closing the door on new entrants to the space. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ex-Ripple CTO: Why Is XRP Not Already $20 If There’s Even a 1% Chance of $10K? appeared first on Times Tabloid .

4 May 2026, 15:58

China’s Alibaba AI Predicts the Price of XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum by the End of May 2026

We prompted China’s Alibaba Qwen AI to predict near-term price predictions for XRP, Bitcoin, and Ethereum, and the result is a tightly structured outlook. It leans on macro easing, ETF momentum, and asset-specific catalysts to justify another leg higher. As per Qwen AI, Bitcoin is expected to push toward $95,000–$100,000 on sustained ETF inflows, potential Fed rate cuts, and continued institutional accumulation. Which is interesting because Bitcoin just reclaimed $80,000 making the prediction realistic and possible. Source: Qwen AI Alibaba AI frame Ethereum for a move into the $3,000–$4,000 range, driven by staking ETF approval narratives, Layer-2 expansion, and deflationary supply mechanics. XRP, meanwhile, is positioned around a technical breakout scenario, with a cup-and-handle structure and regulatory clarity acting as the core drivers behind a move toward $1.70. Xrp (XRP) 24h 7d 30d 1y All time What makes this set of predictions stand out is the balance between catalysts and structure. Qwen is not just projecting targets, it is tying each move to a specific trigger. Bitcoin depends on liquidity and macro conditions. Ethereum relies on institutional product expansion and on-chain growth. XRP is driven by technical breakout confirmation and sentiment shifts tied to regulation and ETF speculation. The question now is whether price action is actually confirming those triggers, or if the market is still lagging behind the narrative. Price Prediction: Can Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP Validate These Alibaba Qwen AI Breakout Predicts? Bitcoin is now trading around $78,996, still holding comfortably above the $75K pivot that Qwen’s entire bullish case depends on. As long as this level holds, the structure supports continuation toward $95K–$100K, driven by ETF inflows and improving macro conditions. The key shift here is stability. BTC is not just hovering at support anymore, it is maintaining strength above it. That said, momentum is still not fully expanding. If the price slips back below $75K, the market is likely to rotate into the more conservative $75K–$85K range, delaying the breakout scenario. Ethereum price is sitting near $2,339, still below the critical reclaim zone. The $2,400–$2,600 range remains the barrier that must be overcome for the $3,000–$4,000 projection to align with reality. Right now, ETH is close, but not there yet. Holding above $2,300 keeps the structure intact, but without a push higher, it remains in a reactive phase. Lose this level, and the downside toward $2,100–$2,200 comes back into focus. The narrative is strong, but price still needs to confirm it. XRP is trading around $1.39, just below the key $1.50 resistance that defines the breakout scenario. This keeps the setup very tight. If XRP can push through $1.50 and hold above it, the move toward $1.70 becomes a direct continuation play, aligning with the cup-and-handle breakout thesis. Momentum can build quickly from there, especially with regulatory clarity and ETF speculation still in the background. On the downside, rejection at $1.50 keeps XRP within its current range and brings the $1.17–$1.30 support zone back into play. That range now acts as the key defense level. Losing it would weaken the structure and shift the tone back toward consolidation rather than expansion. Across all three, the structure remains intact and slightly stronger than before, but the breakout is still not confirmed. Prices are holding in the right zones, but the market still needs that next push to turn positioning into momentum. Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with AI Predicts That Bitcoin Hyper Could Outperform Them All Early-stage infrastructure plays offer a different risk/reward profile entirely, and some traders rotating between cycles are already looking there. Bitcoin Hyper is positioning itself as infrastructure for the next leg: the first Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, claiming sub-Solana latency while inheriting Bitcoin’s security layer. The project has raised $32M in its presale at a current token price of $0.013679, with staking available at high APY for early participants. The core thesis, bringing fast, low-cost smart contracts to Bitcoin without abandoning its trust model, targets a gap that neither Ethereum nor Solana fills directly. Visit Bitcoin Hyper Here. The post China’s Alibaba AI Predicts the Price of XRP, Bitcoin, Ethereum by the End of May 2026 appeared first on Cryptonews .

4 May 2026, 15:57

Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Despite Crypto Market Weakness

As of April 2026, tokenized real-world assets had a distributed on-chain value of approximately 27.65 billion distributed across some 710,000 wallet addresses. The New York Stock Exchange proposed a rule change to the SEC to allow the exchange to trade tokenized securities on its exchange platform. A rising channel pattern drives a short-term recovery momentum in Ethereum price Over the past seven months, the crypto market has been in a correction trend which saw Bitcoin falling from $126,272 to $59,930 and Ethereum price fell from $4,955 to $1,741. While several crypto sectors mimicked this drawdown, the Tokenized Real-World Assets (RWAs) showed notable resilience and continued to attract money. Tokenized real-world assets is the process of creating a digital representation of tangible and non-tangible assets like government bonds, real estate, and private credit onto the blockchain. The segment was once viewed as an experiment for an experimental bridge between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi), has now evolved from a niche trend to a core financial infrastructure. At the heart of this sector, the layer-1 blockchain, Ethereum, stands as the primary settlement layer for institutional-grade finance. Tokenized Real-World Assets Maintain Momentum in Challenging Markets By April 2026 on-chain tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) had reached $30.92 billion in distributed value , supported by $437.19 billion in represented underlying assets and held by an approximate of 740,667 addresses. This growth was amidst wider cryptocurrency prices dropping sharply over the last six months, emphasizing selective capital flows to yield-bearing, real-world exposures in risk-off periods. The sector is dominated by US Treasuries debt with about $15.2 billion tokenized. The amount of private credit is about $6 billion dollars, commodities about $7 billion, and tokenized equities in excess of 1 billion dollars. At approximately 56 percent, Ethereum handles the highest number of settlements. Retail-focused platforms show even heavier concentration, with US Treasury debt often representing over 50% of holdings, followed by private credit and institutional funds. Long-Term Projections Industry forecasts point to significant scaling. The total market of tokenized real-world assets, according to estimates by the Boston Consulting Group, could grow to 16 trillion in value by 2030. Visual data of 2024-2030 depicts the steady yearly growth: beginning with $0.31 billion in 2024, it rises to $0.6 billion in 2025, to $1.5 billion in 2026, and then sharply accelerates upward, through stratified contributions across asset classes. Institutional Activity Trends Large financial institutions have established significant presence. BlackRock’s USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund and products of Franklin Templeton, Ondo, WisdomTree, and so forth contributed to overlaying growth in total value between the beginning of 2023 and the middle of 2025. The stacked graphical illustrations show that the cumulative inflows are accelerating, at least after late 2024, despite the volatility in the market. Operational Shifts and Challenges in Operations. Tokensization transforms traditional assets into blockchain formats, enabling faster settlement, enhanced collateral mobility, and increased distribution. This is not a substitute but an efficiency layer on existing financial products, and attracts participants who focus on yield, the quality of collateral, and optimization of a balance sheet rather than pure price speculation or levearage. Several constraints persist. Depending on location, individual regions have different regulatory rules, risks unique to custody and counterparty must be carefully managed, and there may be a mismatch of liquidity between tokens and underlying assets. Performance is still susceptible to the changes in interest rates. Growth will not necessarily follow a linear path, and need a sustained higher rates and sustained institutional inflows over any general restoration to high-risk appetite assets. According to analyst eyezenhour , RWA is a maturing segment in which portions of the crypto infrastructure are becoming more and more supportive of yield generation and collateral roles in addition to traditional markets. NYSE Advances Tokenized Securities Trading on Traditional Exchange The New York Stock Exchange has filed a proposed rule change with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to allow trading of tokenized Real-World Assets on its platform. The filing, according to reports on May 3, 2026, aligns with the three-year tokenization pilot program launched by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) under a no-action letter by the SEC in December 2025. In the proposal, tokenized versions of qualified shares and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) would be traded alongside conventional shares. These digital assets should have the same CUSIP identifiers, and ticker symbols with rights and economic benefits as their traditional counterparts. They would be subject to the same order book and subject to the same priority and execution rules. The clearing and settlement would remain on a typical T+1 basis through the DTC. This is an important advancement in the adoption of blockchain technology into regulated equity markets in the United States, following similar actions by Nasdaq. It indicates an increasing institutional acceptance of tokenization in the existing financial infrastructure without altering current investor protection features and settlement mechanisms. Ethereum Price Aims to Breakout From Slow-Momentum Channel Over the past three months, the Ethereum price has projected a slow yet steady recovery within a rising channel pattern above $1,800. Amid the geopolitical tension in the middle east, the ETH price continues to resonate within two parallel channel trendlines which act as dynamic resistance and support. As the recovery trend gained momentum along with Bitcoin, the Ethereum price reached $2,375, registering its intraday of 2.25%. Consequently, the asset’s market cap is $286.33B, while the 24-hours trading is up 194% to reach $23.19. Amid steady growth in tokenized real-world assets sector, the Ethereum ETH 1.04% price could continue its recovery and surge 7.5% and challenge the channel resistance at $2,550-$2,600. With a 200-day exponential moving average wavering near the same level, a potential breakout from this level significantly boosts buying pressure on ETH , chasing a potential target of $3,000, followed by $3,400. ETH/USDT -1d Chart On the contrary, if sellers continue to defend the channel resistance, the coin price could prolong its slow-momentum recovery. Conclusion The fast expansion of tokenized real-world assets underscores a significant change in how blockchain technology is being absorbed into international finance. Institutional demand to yield-bearing and/or collateral-backed digital assets continues to grow despite general crypto market weaknesses, with Ethereum remaining at the core of the transformation. The shift of the NYSE to trading tokenized securities is further confirmation of the long-term growth potential of the sector. Although regulatory uncertainty and liquidity issues persist, RWAs are increasingly becoming more than experiments and more of a foundation layer to modern financial infrastructure, to bridge traditional markets to decentralized systems and to broaden the practical use of blockchain.

4 May 2026, 15:40

Oil Supply Risks Shape a Volatile Price Path: BNY Warns of Two-Sided Market Pressure

BitcoinWorld Oil Supply Risks Shape a Volatile Price Path: BNY Warns of Two-Sided Market Pressure Oil markets face a turbulent 2025 as two-sided supply risks dominate the price path, according to a new analysis from BNY. The bank’s strategists highlight that geopolitical tensions and OPEC+ production decisions create a uniquely balanced risk profile for crude oil. This dual threat pushes traders to reassess their positions. The oil supply risks remain the central focus for investors. BNY Analysis: Two-Sided Oil Supply Risks Drive Market Uncertainty BNY’s latest report examines the complex forces shaping the oil price path. On one side, supply disruptions from conflicts in the Middle East threaten to tighten markets. On the other, potential OPEC+ output increases could flood the market with crude. This creates a volatile trading environment. The bank’s experts note that these opposing pressures rarely align with such intensity. They argue that the current setup demands careful risk management. The oil supply risks are not one-dimensional. Analysts point to recent data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) showing global oil demand growth slowing. However, supply constraints from sanctions on Russia and Iran counterbalance this trend. BNY emphasizes that the oil price path will likely see sharp swings. Traders must watch both supply and demand signals closely. The analysis uses a balanced approach to avoid speculation. It relies on verifiable facts from multiple sources. Geopolitical Tensions Amplify Oil Supply Risks Geopolitical instability remains a key driver of oil supply risks. Conflicts in the Middle East, particularly involving major producers, create immediate disruption threats. BNY highlights that any escalation could remove millions of barrels per day from the market. This risk pushes prices higher. However, the bank also notes that diplomatic efforts could ease these tensions. The oil price path depends heavily on these unpredictable events. Recent attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes demonstrate the fragility of supply chains. These incidents force tankers to take longer routes, increasing costs and delays. BNY’s report includes a timeline of key geopolitical events from the past year. It shows a clear pattern of increasing volatility. The bank advises investors to hedge against these risks. The oil supply risks are not just theoretical; they have real-world consequences. OPEC+ Decisions Create Counterbalancing Pressure OPEC+ plays a crucial role in shaping the oil price path. The group’s production quotas directly influence global supply. BNY notes that OPEC+ members have shown discipline in cutting output. However, internal disagreements could lead to a sudden increase in production. This creates a downside risk for prices. The bank’s analysis examines historical OPEC+ decisions. It finds that the group often acts to defend market share. The oil supply risks from OPEC+ are significant. Key producers like Saudi Arabia and Russia face competing pressures. They want higher prices to fund budgets. Yet they also risk losing market share to non-OPEC producers like the United States. BNY’s experts argue that this tension will define the oil price path in 2025. They recommend watching for signals from the next OPEC+ meeting. The outcome will set the tone for the entire year. The oil supply risks are inherently two-sided. Market Impact: How Oil Supply Risks Affect Prices The dual nature of oil supply risks creates a unique market dynamic. When geopolitical tensions spike, prices surge. When OPEC+ signals potential increases, prices drop. This whipsaw effect challenges traders. BNY’s report includes a table showing price volatility over the past six months. It reveals that daily swings of 2-3% have become common. The oil price path is anything but stable. Geopolitical spikes: Prices rise 5-10% on supply disruption fears OPEC+ signals: Prices fall 3-5% on production increase hints Demand data: Weak economic reports add further pressure Inventory changes: U.S. crude stockpiles influence short-term moves These factors combine to create a complex trading environment. BNY emphasizes that investors must stay nimble. The oil supply risks require constant monitoring. The bank’s analysis uses a neutral tone. It avoids making definitive price predictions. Instead, it provides a framework for understanding the forces at play. The oil price path will depend on how these risks evolve. Expert Perspectives on the Oil Price Path Industry experts echo BNY’s concerns about oil supply risks. Analysts from major investment banks have issued similar warnings. Goldman Sachs recently noted that the market is “finely balanced.” Morgan Stanley highlighted the potential for “sharp price moves.” These views align with BNY’s assessment. The consensus points to a volatile year ahead. The oil price path remains uncertain. BNY’s report also references historical parallels. It compares the current situation to 2014, when OPEC+ abandoned production cuts. That decision led to a prolonged price collapse. The bank warns that a repeat scenario is possible. However, it also notes that today’s market is different. The oil supply risks are more diverse. This makes the outlook harder to predict. The analysis adds valuable context for readers. Real-World Impacts of Oil Supply Risks The oil supply risks have tangible effects beyond financial markets. Higher oil prices increase costs for consumers and businesses. This can slow economic growth. BNY’s report examines the impact on inflation. It finds that energy costs remain a key driver of consumer price indices. Central banks watch oil prices closely. The oil price path influences monetary policy decisions. For importing nations, high oil prices strain budgets. Countries like India and Japan face increased import bills. This can weaken their currencies. Exporting nations, on the other hand, benefit from higher revenues. BNY’s analysis highlights this asymmetry. The oil supply risks create winners and losers. The bank advises policymakers to prepare for both scenarios. The oil price path has broad implications. Conclusion BNY’s analysis of oil supply risks provides a clear framework for understanding the oil price path. The two-sided nature of these risks demands careful attention from investors, policymakers, and consumers. Geopolitical tensions and OPEC+ decisions will continue to drive volatility. The market faces a uniquely balanced risk profile. Staying informed is essential. The oil supply risks are not going away anytime soon. FAQs Q1: What are the main oil supply risks identified by BNY? BNY highlights geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and potential OPEC+ production increases as the two main oil supply risks shaping the price path. Q2: How do geopolitical events affect the oil price path? Geopolitical events, such as conflicts or sanctions, can disrupt supply, causing prices to spike. BNY notes that these events create immediate upside risks for the oil price path. Q3: What role does OPEC+ play in oil supply risks? OPEC+ controls production quotas that directly influence global supply. The group’s decisions to cut or increase output create downside or upside risks for the oil price path. Q4: How can investors manage oil supply risks? Investors can hedge against oil supply risks by diversifying portfolios, using futures contracts, and monitoring geopolitical and OPEC+ developments closely. Q5: What is the outlook for the oil price path in 2025? BNY’s analysis suggests a volatile oil price path in 2025, driven by two-sided supply risks. No definitive price prediction is made, but sharp swings are expected. This post Oil Supply Risks Shape a Volatile Price Path: BNY Warns of Two-Sided Market Pressure first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

4 May 2026, 15:34

Binance Launches Withdrawal Lock Feature to Block Forced Fund Transfers

Binance added Withdraw Protection to block on-chain withdrawals for one to seven days, targeting forced crypto transfers during in-person coercion. The feature keeps trading and account access available while delaying outgoing transfers by default. Key Takeaways: Binance introduced Withdraw Protection to block on-chain withdrawals during user-selected lockdown windows. Coercion risks can bypass passwords, 2FA, and

4 May 2026, 15:25

Bitcoin jumps past $80K as Hormuz tensions catch traders off guard

Bitcoin has climbed past $80,000, triggering a wave of short liquidations as geopolitical developments and institutional demand continue to support the rally. According to data from Coingecko, BTC rose nearly 3% to reach $80,529 on Monday, pushing through a level that had capped price action for weeks while extending its monthly gains beyond 20%. Momentum picked up after Donald Trump outlined “Project Freedom” on May 3 via Truth Social, describing a US-led effort to guide stranded cargo ships through the Strait of Hormuz following disruptions tied to the US-Iran conflict. US officials framed the plan as a measure to assist foreign vessels, although Iranian authorities warned that any such intervention could violate the ceasefire and prompt a response. As prices moved higher, liquidation data from CoinGlass showed more than $160 million in Bitcoin short positions were wiped out, contributing to over $300 million in liquidations across the wider crypto market. Separate figures cited by market data indicate total short liquidations reached $452 million over a 24-hour period, pointing to aggressive positioning being forced out as price cleared resistance. Supply squeeze and institutional demand In the meantime, institutional activity has continued to tighten available supply. Commenting on the matter, Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards said institutions are absorbing more than 500% of Bitcoin’s daily mined supply, with around 450 BTC produced per day following the April 2024 halving. Edwards noted that demand growth has outpaced supply expansion, citing a rate of change near 0.0139% for institutional buying compared to roughly 0.0022% for new issuance. He added that similar conditions in the past have led to average gains of about 24% over the following month, which would place Bitcoin near $96,000 by June if the pattern holds. Data tied to ETF inflows and corporate accumulation supports that trend, with roughly 70,000 BTC acquired in April compared to about 13,500 BTC mined in the same period. Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US have recorded a fifth consecutive week of net inflows, with $153 million added last week, reinforcing demand from institutional channels. Further, on-chain data from Glassnode shows accumulation extending beyond large buyers, with wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC adding over 61,000 BTC in the past 30 days. Smaller cohorts, including holders of 1 to 100 BTC, have also increased their balances during that period. Breakout levels draw trader focus According to well-followed crypto analyst Michaël van de Poppe, a move above $79,000 “opens the opportunities” for Bitcoin to target the $86,000 to $88,000 range, with a possible extension toward $90,000. Meanwhile, analyst Matthew Hyland called the latest price action a “disbelief rally,” adding that traders expecting a drop toward $60,000 may turn bullish closer to $90,000. Data from CryptoQuant added further context, with analyst Amr Taha noting two hourly buy volume spikes on Binance of roughly $1.19 billion and $792 million. “When this type of volume appears near a major breakout level, it often shows that traders are not waiting for a pullback; instead, they are chasing confirmation as the price moves higher,” Taha wrote. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $80,328, up 2% on the day. The post Bitcoin jumps past $80K as Hormuz tensions catch traders off guard appeared first on Invezz