News
27 May 2026, 14:00
A Single XRP Ledger Proposal Just Put The Entire DeFi World On Notice — Here’s Why

A new amendment proposal submitted to the XRP Ledger Foundation’s repository on May 26 would fundamentally redesign how liquidity pools function on the XRP Ledger — introducing multiple curve types, concentrated liquidity, and a future fully programmable AMM architecture that mirrors the most advanced decentralized exchange infrastructure currently operating on Ethereum. The proposal, titled AMM Swappable Curves and designated XLS Discussion #547, was submitted by Denis Angell (@dangell7) and Roman Thpt (@RomThpt) — both active contributors to the XRPL codebase — and is currently in draft status awaiting community review, per the GitHub discussion thread. It builds directly on XLS-30, the amendment that introduced XRPL’s original automated market maker in 2024. The Problem The Proposal Solves The current XRP Ledger AMM operates on a single invariant: the constant product formula — the same model used by Uniswap v2, where liquidity is spread uniformly across all price ranges. The proposal identifies three structural gaps that limit the current system’s competitiveness. The first is capital inefficiency. Spreading liquidity uniformly means that only a small fraction is ever active near the current market price — making it less attractive for liquidity providers than concentrated alternatives. The second is curve inflexibility. Volatile trading pairs benefit from constant product pools. Stablecoin pairs benefit from StableSwap curves, which minimize slippage between closely correlated assets. Long-tail or asymmetrically weighted pairs benefit from Balancer-style weighting. Forcing all pairs into one model is a structural disadvantage, per the proposal. The third is composability. The XRPL payment engine already routes across AMM pools and its native order book — adding curve diversity multiplies available liquidity sources without requiring changes to existing pathfinding logic. What The Amendment Would Introduce The proposal introduces a pluggable curve architecture — pool creators select their preferred curve type at creation time from an initial set of three. Curve 0 is the existing constant product model, preserving full backward compatibility with all existing XLS-30 pools. Curve 1 is Concentrated Liquidity — equivalent to Uniswap v3 — allowing liquidity providers to target specific price ranges for dramatically greater capital efficiency. Curve 2 is StableSwap — equivalent to Curve Finance v1 — optimized for stablecoin and correlated asset pairs where minimal slippage matters most, per the proposal’s specification. A fourth curve type — Smart AMM — is reserved for a forthcoming companion specification. It would allow pool creators to deploy WebAssembly binaries providing fully custom swap mathematics, dynamic fees, and lifecycle hooks including before and after swap, deposit, and withdrawal events. The architecture intentionally mirrors the host ABI and sandbox model already being developed for XLS-100 Smart Escrows — meaning the WASM runtime infrastructure is being built once and reused across multiple XRPL features, per the proposal. Why It Matters For XRP Multiple pools per token pair — one for each curve type — would operate simultaneously without affecting existing pools. The XRPL’s payment engine would route across all of them automatically, selecting the optimal liquidity source for each transaction without any changes required from end users or existing integrations, per the technical specification. This development marks a pivotal moment for the XRP Ledger’s DeFi infrastructure. A protocol that already hosts over $2 billion in tokenized real-world assets and processes $1.93 billion in monthly stablecoin transfers gaining Uniswap v3-grade concentrated liquidity and Curve Finance-style stable pools would represent a meaningful step toward institutional-grade on-chain liquidity — exactly the infrastructure that the asset managers, banks, and stablecoin issuers currently building on XRPL will eventually require. Cover image from Grok, XRPUSD chart from Tradingview
27 May 2026, 13:43
Robinhood Opens Platform to AI Agents for Stock Trading and Credit Card Spending

Retail brokerage Robinhood now lets users delegate stock purchases and credit card transactions to third-party AI systems.
27 May 2026, 13:30
'Price Is King': Peter Brandt Says Markets Are Never Wrong in Bitcoin Take

Legendary Trader Peter Brandt reiterates long held principle in technical analysis in relation to Bitcoin price as crypto community anticipates next move.
27 May 2026, 13:30
XRP MVRV Hits Lowest Level Since 2020 As Traders Sell Into Fear

XRP traders are sitting on deep short-term losses, with Santiment Intelligence saying the token’s 30-day MVRV has fallen to its lowest level since December 2020. The on-chain analytics firm framed the move as an “extreme undervalued zone” after months of selling pressure pushed recent buyers heavily underwater. The chart shared by Santiment tracks XRP Ledger’s price alongside its 30-day and 365-day MVRV ratios on Sanbase. It shows XRP’s 30-day MVRV at roughly minus 47%, while the 365-day reading also sits deeply negative at around minus 36%. Santiment’s visual marks the current area as an “opportunity” zone, contrasting it with prior elevated MVRV phases labeled as sell-risk territory. XRP Is In Extreme Undervalued Zone Santiment said the data suggests the average XRP trader active over the past month is now down sharply, a level that historically has coincided with periods of intense capitulation. Related Reading: XRP Crowd Fear Deepens As Santiment Points To Possible Rebound “The average XRP trader that has been active in the past 30 days is down a whopping -47% with many selling at the bottom,” Santiment wrote. “Historically, MVRV’s average trading returns will always average out to 0%, making this current time an extreme undervalued zone for XRP. The chart shows that XRP’s 30-day MVRV has now fallen to its lowest level since December, 2020, suggesting that fear and frustration among traders have reached rare extremes that have historically preceded strong rebounds.” MVRV, or market value to realized value, is commonly used by on-chain analysts to estimate whether holders are sitting on unrealized profits or losses. In Santiment’s framing, deeply negative short-term MVRV readings indicate that recent market participants have largely been washed out, reducing the amount of marginal selling pressure from traders who bought near local highs. Related Reading: XRP’s Utility Narrative Extends Beyond Conventional Market Cap Metrics That matters because XRP’s recent drawdown followed a strong rally in late 2024 and early 2025, according to Santiment. The firm said many traders entered near local tops before momentum cooled, leaving short-term holders exposed as repeated selloffs dragged the asset lower. The result is a market structure in which average recent buyers are no longer merely underwater, but deeply so. Santiment also tied the current setup to broader XRP narratives that remain active despite the retracement. The firm pointed to continued optimism among longer-term investors around regulatory progress, ETF speculation and Ripple’s adoption story, while noting that the token has lost more than half its market value since last summer. “Despite the major price retracement that has seen XRP lose over half its market value since last summer, patient investors still have optimism surrounding regulatory progress, ETF speculation, and Ripple’s long-term adoption narrative,” Santiment said. “XRP rallied aggressively in late 2024 and early 2025, which left many traders buying near local tops before momentum cooled off. But since then, repeated selloffs have pushed many short-term holders deeply underwater.” The key question is whether the negative MVRV reading marks exhaustion or simply reflects the severity of the downtrend. Santiment did not present the metric as a standalone timing signal. Instead, it argued that historically depressed MVRV levels tend to appear when retail traders have largely capitulated, creating conditions in which relatively modest positive news can have an outsized effect. “The deeply negative MVRV zone that we’re seeing for XRP now tends to appear when retail traders have largely given up, creating conditions where even small positive catalysts can trigger strong recoveries,” Santiment wrote. “While weak MVRV readings alone do not guarantee a reversal, they often signal that the majority of panic selling has already occurred and downside risk becomes more limited compared to potential upside.” At press time, XRP traded at $1.33. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
27 May 2026, 13:30
Ethereum Risks Drop to $1,800 as Daily Chart Support Weakens

BitcoinWorld Ethereum Risks Drop to $1,800 as Daily Chart Support Weakens Ethereum (ETH) faces a critical test in the coming sessions as the cryptocurrency’s price hovers near the lower boundary of a daily ascending channel that has contained its movements since February. Technical analysts warn that a decisive break below this support level could open the door for a decline toward the $1,800 demand zone, representing a potential drop of over 18% from current levels. Bearish Pressure Builds After May Resistance Rejection The bearish outlook for ETH has been building since mid-May, when the price encountered strong resistance near the $2,400 mark. Since that rejection, Ethereum has been trading in a descending pattern, with each rally attempt meeting selling pressure. The 100-day moving average, currently situated around $2,200, has emerged as the primary resistance level that bulls must overcome to shift the near-term trend. At present, ETH is barely holding onto the lower support line of the ascending channel, a structure that has guided price action for several months. This support line has been tested multiple times since February, but each previous test resulted in a bounce. The current test, however, comes amid broader weakness in the cryptocurrency market and reduced risk appetite among traders. Key Levels to Watch: $1,800 Support and $2,200 Resistance Should the channel support fail to hold, the next major support level is identified as the $1,800 demand zone. This area has historically attracted buying interest and could provide a floor for the price if a breakdown occurs. A move to $1,800 would represent a significant retracement from the year’s highs and would likely trigger increased volatility and trading volume. On the upside, Ethereum must first reclaim the 100-day moving average near $2,200 to signal a potential reversal of the current downtrend. A sustained move above this level would indicate that buying pressure is returning and could pave the way for a retest of the $2,400 resistance zone. However, until such a breakout occurs, the path of least resistance remains to the downside. What This Means for Traders and Investors For short-term traders, the current setup presents a clear risk-reward scenario. A breakdown below the channel support could lead to rapid selling, while a bounce from the support line could offer a quick trading opportunity. Long-term investors, however, may view a potential drop to $1,800 as a buying opportunity, given Ethereum’s fundamental role in the decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible token (NFT) ecosystems. The broader market context is also important. Ethereum’s price action is influenced by macroeconomic factors, including interest rate expectations and regulatory developments. Any negative news on these fronts could accelerate the decline, while positive catalysts could help the price stabilize. Conclusion Ethereum is at a pivotal juncture, with the daily ascending channel support acting as the last line of defense against a deeper correction. A break below this level would likely target the $1,800 demand zone, while a successful hold could lead to a recovery toward the 100-day moving average. Traders should monitor these key levels closely in the coming days for confirmation of the next directional move. FAQs Q1: What is the ascending channel pattern in Ethereum’s daily chart? The ascending channel is a technical pattern formed by two parallel upward-sloping trend lines. The upper line represents resistance, and the lower line represents support. Ethereum has been trading within this channel since February, and a break below the lower support line would signal a bearish reversal. Q2: Why is the $1,800 level important for Ethereum? The $1,800 level is a key demand zone where buyers have historically stepped in to support the price. It also represents a significant psychological round number and a potential area of technical support based on previous price action. Q3: What could trigger a reversal in Ethereum’s price? A reversal would require Ethereum to reclaim the 100-day moving average near $2,200 with strong volume. Positive catalysts such as favorable regulatory news, increased institutional adoption, or a broader market rally could also help shift momentum in favor of the bulls. This post Ethereum Risks Drop to $1,800 as Daily Chart Support Weakens first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
27 May 2026, 13:30
Bitcoin: How $1.29B in BlackRock IBIT trades sparked BTC ETF outflows

IBIT sales drove 4.32K BTC outflows worth $324M, with daily trading volume hitting $6.07 billion.










































