hodler

26 May 2026, 08:37

Polkadot price outlook: how Referendum 1890 could move DOT

Polkadot (DOT) has been trading in a narrow and uncertain range, with recent price action showing DOT hovering around $1.24 to $1.25, after a 1% decline over the past 24 hours. At the centre of attention is Referendum 1890 , a governance proposal under Polkadot’s OpenGov system that is set to reshape validator economics. Validator rules take centre stage ahead of May 31 upgrade Referendum 1890 introduces a mandatory requirement for validators to hold a minimum self-stake of 10,000 DOT. At the current price of about $1.24 per DOT, this translates to roughly $12,400 per validator in locked capital. The rule is designed to ensure that validators carry meaningful financial exposure to their own performance. This change forms part of a wider staking redesign that aims to improve network security and simplify staking mechanics. One of the planned downstream effects is the introduction of “unslashing” protections for nominators, reducing the direct risk that smaller stakers face when validators misbehave. Another expected shift is a reduction in unbonding time, moving from the current extended waiting period of roughly 28 days to a much shorter window of around 24-48 hours. Market focus shifts to validator behaviour ahead of enforcement The coming weeks place Polkadot in a transition phase where governance decisions and market liquidity conditions are moving in opposite directions. In the short term, the main driver of Polkadot’s price movement is expected to remain the validator transition process tied to Referendum 1890. Some operators who do not meet the new threshold may need to acquire DOT or rebalance positions quickly before the enforcement deadline set around May 31, 2026, creating the possibility of temporary selling pressure. The key uncertainty is how many validators will need to adjust positions before the deadline and whether those adjustments will require open-market selling of DOT. A successful and orderly transition could shift attention back toward the longer-term benefits of the staking redesign, including improved staking efficiency and faster capital mobility. However, if there are more operators who will need to buy DOT coins or rebalance positions, then the price could fall below $1.24 as short-term supply pressure is outweighing governance-driven optimism. If that happens, then traders can set their eyes on the next support level at $1.18, where prior accumulation was observed. Polkadot price chart But if a majority of the operators meet the new threshold, then the transition may not impact the market as much, and DOT could hold above the $1.24 support zone and continue to consolidate as participants wait for clarity on validator compliance. The post Polkadot price outlook: how Referendum 1890 could move DOT appeared first on Invezz

26 May 2026, 08:26

Ferrari shares slide as $640,000 EV raises doubts about brand’s future

Ferrari (RACE) got hit in the market on Tuesday after showing its first fully electric car, the Luce, a $640,000 model that has already turned into a fight about what the brand should even be in the EV age. The launch was held in Rome by the Italian luxury sports car maker based out of Maranello, Italy. “Luce,” meaning “light” in Italian, has been named for the message of clarity and direction. However, the trading community hasn’t quite approved of the decision as Ferrari stocks listed on the Milan exchange dropped 6.1% in morning trade after narrowing some losses. Within the year, its stocks have lost close to 27%. Ferrari tests loyal buyers with an electric car that looks nothing like its old supercars The Luce is not a traditional Ferrari with its sharp corners, rumbling engines, and chaotic beauty associated with the brand. This is an entirely new car, with a novel design – something that made its debut quite challenging for Ferrari. In the past, the manufacturer had announced that it would never make an all-electric vehicle but instead opt for petrol-powered hybrid vehicles. Benedetto Vigna, the CEO of Ferrari, revealed in Rome that the Luce required a development period of five years to come to life. Following its presentation, he referred to it as a serious technology project rather than just another experiment with the company’s first electric car. The car uses its own Ferrari-built electric motors on each wheel, enabling it to accelerate to 60 mph in 2.5 seconds, allegedly. The company also said it built the car’s parts in-house, wanting to keep control of repairs for years and help protect the car’s resale value. That matters at this price point, because nobody paying $640,000 wants a future museum piece that becomes impossible to service. At the moment, it is difficult for large automobile companies to operate in the electric car sector. Such prestigious names as Porsche and Lamborghini had to tone down their electric car production due to declining interest. It is becoming even harder for them since Chinese electric brands started creating pressure through more affordable, fast, and aggressive competition. Ford and Volkswagen are going back to gasoline-powered vehicles. This is due to poor sales of electric vehicles in America during the time of Donald Trump’s presidency. Ferrari executives answer backlash as social media splits over the Luce design The internet reacted like the car had personally insulted someone’s grandfather. One X account wrote: “Ferrari just killed their brand just like Jaguar did. This is straight to the junkyard trash.” Another account posted: “What is going on with European Luxury car manufacturers? First Jaguar and now Ferrari.” (Jaguar had faced backlash after changing its look and brand message.) A third X post said: “Absolute masterclass in design. Ferrari just unveiled the breathtaking LUCE concept, and it is a total game changer.” Flavio Manzoni, Ferrari’s chief design officer, spoke about the criticism in an interview with YouTuber Cleo Abram. After that first mention, Flavio said critics are part of building something new. He also admitted that an electric Ferrari with a very different shape is “polarising,” but said he thinks people may warm to it in the coming months. Benedetto also defended the design when CNBC asked whether Ferrari could satisfy both new buyers and its traditional customers. He said : “Look, when you do a new technology, you need always to keep in mind a word that is called respect.” He added: “Respect of the technology, because when you have a new technology, you need to make sure that that technology is properly represented in the design, so the design must be different.” According to Benedetto, the company will not leave behind its petrol and hybrid vehicles. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

26 May 2026, 08:20

Indian Rupee Corrects as Oil Price Rebound Revives Mideast Risk Premium

BitcoinWorld Indian Rupee Corrects as Oil Price Rebound Revives Mideast Risk Premium The Indian rupee retreated against the US dollar on Tuesday, snapping a brief period of stability, as a sharp rebound in global crude oil prices reintroduced risk aversion into emerging market currencies. The reversal was triggered by renewed geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East, raising concerns about supply disruptions and inflationary pressures for oil-importing nations like India. Oil Prices and the Rupee’s Vulnerability Brent crude futures climbed more than 3% in early Asian trading after reports of heightened military activity near key shipping lanes in the Persian Gulf. For India, which imports over 80% of its crude oil requirements, every sustained rise in oil prices directly widens the current account deficit and fuels imported inflation. This dynamic historically places downward pressure on the rupee, as importers rush to buy dollars to cover higher energy costs. The rupee had been trading in a narrow range in recent sessions, supported by expectations of foreign portfolio inflows and a relatively stable dollar index. However, the sudden oil price spike overwhelmed those factors, pushing the USD/INR pair back toward the 84.50 handle, levels not seen since late last month. Traders reported increased demand for dollars from oil marketing companies and state-run banks acting on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Geopolitical Uncertainty Returns to Focus The latest flare-up in Middle East tensions comes just as markets had begun pricing in a potential de-escalation. Analysts note that the region remains a tinderbox, with any disruption to Strait of Hormuz traffic capable of sending oil prices sharply higher. The renewed risk premium has also weighed on other Asian currencies, including the Indonesian rupiah and the Thai baht, but India’s heavy reliance on imported energy makes the rupee particularly sensitive. Market participants are now watching for any verbal intervention from the RBI, which has occasionally stepped in to smooth excessive volatility. The central bank’s foreign exchange reserves, which stood at over $650 billion as of the last reporting week, provide ample firepower to defend the currency. However, the RBI typically avoids defending a specific level and instead focuses on preventing disorderly moves. What This Means for Importers and Consumers A weaker rupee combined with higher oil prices creates a double blow for Indian households and businesses. Fuel prices at the pump, which had remained stable for months, could face upward pressure if crude sustains levels above $85 per barrel. Industries reliant on imported raw materials, such as chemicals, plastics, and edible oils, may also see margin compression. For investors, the currency move adds another layer of uncertainty to an already volatile global macro environment. Conclusion The Indian rupee’s correction reflects the enduring vulnerability of oil-importing economies to geopolitical shocks in the Middle East. While the RBI’s reserve cushion offers a buffer against extreme moves, the near-term trajectory of the rupee will hinge on whether oil prices retreat or extend gains. Traders and policymakers alike are now watching for diplomatic signals that could de-escalate tensions and restore some calm to currency markets. FAQs Q1: Why does a rise in oil prices weaken the Indian rupee? India imports most of its crude oil, so higher prices increase the demand for US dollars to pay for those imports. This added dollar demand puts downward pressure on the rupee’s exchange rate. Q2: Can the Reserve Bank of India prevent the rupee from falling further? The RBI can intervene by selling US dollars from its foreign exchange reserves to support the rupee. However, it typically intervenes to curb excessive volatility rather than defend a specific level. Q3: How does a weaker rupee affect the average Indian consumer? A weaker rupee makes imported goods more expensive, which can lead to higher prices for fuel, cooking oil, electronics, and other imported items. It can also contribute to overall inflationary pressures. This post Indian Rupee Corrects as Oil Price Rebound Revives Mideast Risk Premium first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

26 May 2026, 08:16

Cramer warns Nvidia shareholders are being overlooked

Jim Cramer said on Monday night episode of Mad Money that Nvidia (NVDA) investors are being asked to accept too little from a company that has already become one of the biggest names in the stock market. Jim said the company still makes him happy, but the latest earnings reaction was a problem because even though the report beat earnings, the NVDA stock crashed and Wall Street seemed uninterested. Jim opened with a small breakfast story. He said he bought an egg, ham, and cheese sandwich over the weekend. He joked that it was not Taylor Ham, which already sounds like a very Jim thing to say. Then he said noticed the cook had written Nvidia on the order slip instead of his name. Jim said, “I wish, during the transaction, I could have explained what must happen to get this stock to hunt again. It is undeniable that with this quarter, Nvidia has, indeed, lost its luster.” Jim says Nvidia must give shareholders more after strong earnings failed to lift the stock In the past, a big earnings beat from Nvidia could light a fire under the stock. This time, Wall Street looked at the numbers and basically said, “Nice. What else?” However, Jim observed that the stock doesn’t seem to have the same kind of automatic affection with traders as in the past. NVDA shares rose from around $180 to close at a record high of nearly $236 within five trading days ahead of the quarterly report on May 14. Jim understood that people could say the rise wouldn’t continue at that pace, but then he mentioned that the market is like the playoffs, where every team is assessed based on their latest performance. As per that logic, some stocks had done better than NVDA. He also questioned whether Nvidia still deserves the old “own, don’t trade” tag. Jim did not fully throw it away, but he said the company needs a new plan, like for instance capital allocation, which is just the way a company uses its cash. Jim used AAPL stock as an example. He mentioned Luca Maestri, who was the previous financial chief at Apple, saying that he realized the power of having a lot of cash as long as the company used it wisely. Nvidia raises its dividend while investors watch Apple and Microsoft for comparison The Nvidia dividend payments have increased. This growth took place after increasing the payment to shareholders from $0.01 to $0.25, meaning a growth of 2,400%. The dividend for the entire year will be equal to $1 per share. This leads to the current yield being at 0.47%. While it is not a high yield compared to the current average yield in the S&P 500 of 1.1%, it is higher than Apple , which yields 0.35%. The new dividend yield is closer to Microsoft’s (MSFT) yield of 0.87%. Nvidia’s dividend story already looked strange in 2024 because its payout technically rose 900% after the company’s 10-for-1 stock split. Now the newer increase makes the number look much bigger on paper. The company can afford the payout. Nvidia reported diluted earnings per share of $2.39 in its latest quarter. That easily covers a full year of dividends at the current rate. The payout ratio is still tiny, so Nvidia has room to raise the dividend again if management wants to do that. But that does not mean it will happen. Big tech companies usually prefer share buybacks over large dividends. Apple and Microsoft both make heavy profits, yet they have not turned themselves into high-yield stocks. The reason is simple. Once a company starts giving investors bigger dividends, investors expect more. Every year becomes another test. That can get awkward for a company like Nvidia because its main story is still growth. Investors are buying Nvidia because of AI chips, data centers, and demand for computing power. They are not buying it because they want a tiny dividend check every quarter. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

26 May 2026, 08:03

Lido EarnUSD: Why Stablecoin Yield Products Are Moving Beyond Staking

You open your portfolio app and a new tile flashes to the top: “EarnUSD.” It promises a dollar-denominated yield, composable across DeFi, without the rollercoaster of ETH price exposure. Is this just staking in disguise? Not quite. The newest generation of stablecoin yield products is moving past simple staking APRs and into a mix of on-chain and off-chain engines: treasuries, market-neutral strategies, and liquidity design that aims to keep dollars stable while still earning. This feature unpacks the idea often dubbed “Lido EarnUSD” by commentators—shorthand for a hypothetical USD yield wrapper associated with Lido’s liquid staking footprint—and explains why the market is broadening beyond staking alone. Note: there is no official Lido product by this name at the time of writing; think of “EarnUSD” here as a design pattern the industry is moving toward. The Big Picture: Stablecoin Yield Is Unbundling from Staking ETH staking transformed DeFi’s base yield. Liquid staking tokens (LSTs) like stETH brought staking rewards into every corner of crypto. But stablecoin holders want something different: dollar stability with a dependable, transparent yield that does not require taking directional ETH risk. That demand is pushing builders to pull apart the yield stack. Instead of only relying on staking, projects route returns from multiple engines: tokenized T-bills, on-chain credit, delta-neutral hedging, liquidity fees, or even specialized basis trades. Each has its own risk surface and operational complexity. The stablecoin yield race is no longer about who stakes best; it’s about who can package reliable, auditable, and liquid dollars with a risk-adjusted return users actually understand. Institutions, DeFi natives, and retail savers all have different constraints. That’s why we’re seeing a spectrum of designs—from overcollateralized crypto-backed dollars to tokens that pass through off-chain treasury income under a regulated wrapper. What “EarnUSD” Signals About Design Priorities Even as a concept, “Lido EarnUSD” points to a direction of travel. Lido’s brand is intertwined with stETH, the largest LST by many measures. If the market imagines a Lido-flavored USD yield product, it’s because a few core priorities are crystallizing across DeFi: Native composability: A dollar that earns while plugging into lending, DEXs, and collateral frameworks. Simplicity at the surface: Users see a single asset with a yield number. The complex machinery stays under the hood. Clear sourcing of returns: Whether staking-derived, market-neutral, or treasuries—investors need to know what actually generates yield. Liquidity by design: Deep primary and secondary markets to minimize slippage and protect the peg during stress. Operational and oracle discipline: Transparent rebalancing, robust oracles, and predictable issuance/redemption. Crucially, a hypothetical EarnUSD associated with Lido would need to be explicit about whether it leans on stETH yield, off-chain treasuries, or a blend—and how it neutralizes any non-USD exposure. That clarity is where today’s leading products differentiate themselves. From stETH to Dollars: How a Yield-Bearing USD Token Could Work There are several viable architectures for a USD-denominated yield token. Each tries to deliver a steady dollar peg while capturing a return source and managing risk. Below are three common blueprints relevant to any “EarnUSD”-style product. LST-backed, overcollateralized model In this design, users deposit stETH (or other LSTs) as collateral to mint a USD-stable asset. The system may direct staking yield toward interest for the stablecoin holders. Protocols like Lybra and Prisma explored variations of this concept using LSTs and overcollateralized debt positions. The challenge is pegging to USD while the underlying asset and its yield are linked to ETH economics; robust risk parameters, liquidations, and collateral haircuts are essential. RWA/Treasury-backed pass-through model Here, user funds are transformed—often via a regulated issuer—into short-duration U.S. Treasuries or similar cash equivalents. Yield is then passed through to token holders under a specific legal framework. This is closer to tokenized money-market exposure. It can be more predictable but introduces off-chain custody, regulatory scope, and settlement risks. Market-neutral or basis-trade model Another route is to collect funding basis or staking rewards while hedging out the underlying price risk with perpetual swaps or futures. The goal is to isolate a USD yield from crypto market direction. Ethena’s USDe popularized a version of this by pairing spot assets with short perps to synthesize a dollar-like exposure while harvesting funding and staking flows. It’s operationally complex and sensitive to exchange liquidity, basis regimes, and hedging costs. Putting it together: a possible flow Whether LST-centric or treasury-centric, a coherent USD yield wrapper tends to follow a disciplined loop: Source selection: Choose the underlying engine(s)—LST yield, T-bills, market-neutral basis, or a blend. Hedging/neutralization: If the source has non-USD risk (e.g., ETH price), implement hedges or overcollateralization. Tokenization: Mint a USD-denominated asset with clear redemption mechanics and fee schedule. Liquidity seeding: Establish primary issuance/redemption and secondary DEX/AMM pools for tight spreads. Oracle and disclosure: Publish NAV, yield drivers, and collateral composition; use resilient price feeds. Risk governance: Define limits, stress tests, circuit breakers, and transparent policy updates. No matter the route, credibility depends on predictable mint/redeem, visible collateral or hedges, and conservative assumptions. Any “EarnUSD”-style product claiming to be simple on the surface must be even more rigorous under the hood. Comparing Yield Engines Competing for Your Stablecoin Stablecoin yield products now span multiple categories. The table below distills the main approaches, typical exposures, and who they might fit. Examples are illustrative and not endorsements. CategorySource of ReturnPrimary ExposurePeg ConsiderationsIllustrative ExamplesBest ForLST-backed, overcollateralizedStaking yield on ETH via LSTsETH collateral value and staking mechanicsRequires robust liquidations and collateral buffers Lybra , Prisma Users comfortable with crypto-native collateral riskRWA/Treasury pass-throughShort-term Treasuries or cash equivalentsOff-chain custody, issuer and banking relationshipsRedemption windows and KYC can affect liquidity MakerDAO DSR , Frax sFRAX , Ondo USDY Users seeking treasury-like exposure via tokensMarket-neutral/basisPerp funding, basis, and/or staking with hedgesExchange liquidity, counterparty, hedging costsSensitive to funding regime shifts and oracle design Ethena USDe Users who understand derivatives and basis cyclesOn-chain credit/lendingBorrowing demand from DeFi participantsSmart-contract and borrower default riskUtilization swings can hit yields and peg depth Aave , Compound Liquidity providers familiar with DeFi creditLiquidity AMMs/feesSwap fees and incentives in stable poolsImpermanent loss in non-stable pairs; pool healthRequires deep pools and robust routing Curve , Uniswap Active LPs optimizing fee tiers and ranges If “EarnUSD” existed, it would have to pick one lane or carefully blend them with explicit risk limits. The more engines mixed, the more a product depends on risk governance and clear communication. Liquidity, Peg Defense, and Composability Are Make-or-Break Delivering sustainable yield is only half of the equation. The other half is making sure the token behaves like a dollar when markets stress. Liquidity engineering Stable swaps and primary issuance/redemption set the tone. Deep Curve-style pools, active market makers, and mint/redeem at or near NAV help pin price to $1. If a product uses off-chain assets, operational windows and settlement lags should be public so traders can price liquidity correctly. Peg management and oracles Even treasury-backed wrappers can deviate intraday. Transparent NAV updates, resilient oracles, and automated arbitrage pathways matter. For crypto-collateralized designs, liquidation incentives and collateral haircuts are crucial to prevent cascading depegs during volatility. Composability and collateral status Getting accepted as collateral on major lending markets or DEX routing can amplify utility and deepen liquidity. However, composability increases blast radius: a depeg can ripple through money markets and structured products. Prudent caps and isolation modes are safety valves. Why Regulation Is Quietly Steering Design Choices Yield-bearing dollars intersect with securities, payments, and banking rules. In the U.S., regulators have scrutinized interest-bearing crypto accounts; notable actions against centralized yield programs signaled that certain offerings could be securities if not properly registered or exempt. For example, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has pursued cases involving yield products, as seen in its public actions against interest accounts ( SEC press release ). Each design must consider disclosure, distribution, and who can buy the token. In the EU, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) introduces a framework for asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, with restrictions on remuneration and requirements for issuers and reserve management. The full implications for interest-bearing stablecoins depend on specific structures and authorizations. Readers can reference the official text for high-level guidance ( MiCA regulation ). Real-world asset (RWA) wrappers typically introduce KYC/AML and transfer restrictions; crypto-native, overcollateralized designs may avoid off-chain custody but face different prudential challenges. Any “EarnUSD”-type product would need to navigate these boundaries deliberately and communicate its legal posture clearly. This article is not legal advice. A Practical Checklist for Evaluating a USD Yield Token Use this field guide to cut through marketing and understand what you are buying: Identify the yield engine: Is it staking-based, treasury-backed, market-neutral, or a blend? What are the exact drivers of return? Map the risk stack: Smart-contract risk, oracle dependencies, liquidation mechanics, off-chain custody, exchange counterparty risk. Redemption clarity: Who can mint/redeem? At what frequency? Are there gates, fees, or KYC requirements? NAV and disclosure cadence: How often are NAV, holdings, and performance published? Are audits or attestations available? Liquidity depth: Check pool sizes, order books, and historical spreads. Can you exit near $1 in stress? Governance and limits: Is there a risk committee, parameter caps, or circuit breakers? How are changes approved? Incentive dependence: Would yields collapse without token incentives or “points”? Is there organic demand? Tax and jurisdiction: Could pass-through yield create tax complexity? Are you eligible to hold or redeem the token? Risks & What Could Go Wrong Depeg events: Shallow liquidity, sudden collateral drawdowns, or redemption delays can push price below $1. Hedging breakdowns: For market-neutral designs, funding flips or exchange outages can impair the strategy. Regulatory actions: Enforcement or rule changes may restrict distribution, affect rewards, or force design overhauls. Oracle and smart-contract failures: Bugs or manipulations can cause bad accounting, liquidations, or theft. Concentration risk: Heavy reliance on a single asset (e.g., stETH) or venue (a specific CEX or custodian). Incentive cliff: If yields rely on emissions or points, they may drop when programs end. Operational frictions: Settlement lags, KYC queues, or banking rails can impair redemptions in RWA models. Stablecoin yield is not a free lunch. Understand exactly how a dollar earns, who holds the risk, and how the peg is defended when the music stops. For ongoing coverage of liquid staking, RWA tokenization, and stablecoin market structure, Crypto Daily tracks protocol updates and risk events across major ecosystems. Stay informed at Crypto Daily . Frequently Asked Questions Is “Lido EarnUSD” an official product? No. In this article, “EarnUSD” refers to a conceptual USD yield wrapper associated with common market discussions around Lido’s ecosystem. If any official product launches, rely on Lido’s site ( lido.fi ) and documentation for accurate details. How is a yield-bearing stablecoin different from just holding USDC or USDT? Traditional stablecoins aim to track $1 without passing through yield. A yield-bearing stablecoin or wrapper seeks to deliver a return via staking, treasuries, lending, or market-neutral strategies. That added return comes with additional risks and mechanics you should evaluate. Could an ETH staking-based USD token keep its peg in a crash? It depends on collateral buffers, liquidation design, and market liquidity. Overcollateralized models can withstand large moves if parameters are conservative and liquidations work as intended. However, extreme volatility or oracle failures can still cause depegs. Are RWA/treasury-backed tokens “safer” than crypto-native designs? They may offer more predictable returns but introduce different risks: off-chain custody, regulatory constraints, banking rails, and redemption windows. “Safer” is context-dependent. Compare disclosures, legal structure, and your ability to redeem at NAV. What drives returns in market-neutral designs like USDe? Typically, a mix of perpetual funding basis, potential staking yield on collateral, and careful hedging. Returns are sensitive to market regimes, exchange liquidity, and risk limits. Transparent reporting and conservative parameters are vital. How do I assess liquidity before buying a yield-bearing dollar? Check primary mint/redeem rules, on-chain pool depth (e.g., Curve, Uniswap), historical slippage, and any market-maker support. In stress, deep secondary liquidity and predictable redemption are what hold the peg together. Is this financial advice? No. Stablecoin yield products carry meaningful risks: volatility, smart-contract bugs, regulatory changes, custody exposure, and liquidity constraints. Do your own research and consider independent advice before allocating capital. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

26 May 2026, 08:02

XRPL Foundation Stuns XRP Army With Bullish Message: Something Big Coming Tomorrow?

The XRP Ledger Foundation (@XRPLF) posted six words on May 25, 2026: “Tomorrow’s going to be a great day.” The post had no context or link to an announcement, but featured an image that immediately registered with longtime XRP holders. It was a modified version of the cover photo used by bearableguy123, an anonymous figure known for cryptic posts and strong support for XRP. The bearableguy123 persona originated in 2018 and has consistently pushed for an XRP price target of $589 . Tomorrow’s going to be a great day. pic.twitter.com/xBHwkfxdNY — XRP Ledger Foundation (@XRPLF) May 25, 2026 Community members counted the dots in the image and found that three clusters featured 5, 8, and 9 dots. These make up $589, the long-standing price target tied to bearableguy123’s lore. Then came a second interpretation: 5 × 8 × 9 = 360, making a full circle. Some took that as a deliberate signal pointing to Circle, the issuer of USDC, which Ripple has tried to acquire. Ripple’s History With Circle In 2025, Ripple proposed a Circle acquisition for $4 billion to $5 billion , a bid that was rejected as too low. While Ripple remained interested in Circle, it had not decided whether to make another offer, with Circle focused on following through on an IPO. Ripple later reportedly raised its offer to $20 billion . The persistence of that interest set the stage for what the community now believes could be a fresh move. Rumors are now circulating that Ripple has successfully acquired Circle , and the announcement may come as early as today. This move would place USDC, the $61 billion stablecoin, under Ripple’s control. Neither company has publicly confirmed active acquisition talks, but the speculation has not faded. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 What a Deal Would Mean for XRP and RLUSD Ripple already operates its own dollar-pegged stablecoin. RLUSD’s market cap now exceeds $1 billion , and it is used in partnership with Mastercard, WebBank, and Gemini. But USDC operates at a different scale entirely. USDC commands a market cap of approximately $61.7 billion, making it the second-largest stablecoin behind Tether’s USDT. Acquiring Circle would give Ripple immediate scale, leveraging USDC’s established network and institutional partnerships with firms like BlackRock and BNY, which manage its reserves. For XRP holders, control over USDC combined with RLUSD would position Ripple as the dominant force in dollar-pegged digital assets globally. While the announcement has not been confirmed, a major acquisition like this brings XRP one step closer to that $589 price target. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post XRPL Foundation Stuns XRP Army With Bullish Message: Something Big Coming Tomorrow? appeared first on Times Tabloid .