Invest ideasNews
2 May 2026, 01:00
All about Bitcoin’s bullish market shift and a ‘dangerous’ divergence
Rallies driven by a lack of sellers instead of the presence of sustained, aggressive buyers are structurally weaker.
2 May 2026, 01:00
Bitcoin Slips Below Key Holder Cost Basis Ahead Of $1.74B Options Expiry
Bitcoin is trading below a key cost threshold that short-term holders paid to acquire it — a sign that many recent buyers are sitting on losses heading into one of the largest options expiry events of the month. Related Reading: 23 Billion+ XRP Already Quantum Safe, According To New Wallet Analysis Bitcoin: Bears Hold The Edge Going Into Expiry Glassnode data shows Bitcoin is currently priced under the Short-Term Holder Cost Basis of $78,900, and also below the True Market Mean of $78,000. Support is seen further down, in the $65,000–$70,000 range. That backdrop sets a cautious tone as roughly 23,000 Bitcoin options contracts — worth $1.74 billion — are set to expire today on derivatives exchange Deribit. The put-call ratio for those contracts sits at 1.10, meaning more traders are betting on price declines than on gains. Bitcoin’s max pain price — the level where the greatest number of options expire worthless — is $76,000, slightly below where it was trading at press time around $77,200. Deribit has flagged the settlement as one to watch closely, with data showing a 95% probability that Bitcoin options expire above that $76,000 mark. Heavy volume is concentrated at the $75,500 and $77,000 strike prices. 🚨 May 1st Options Expiry Alert. At 08:00 UTC today, ~$2.14B in crypto options are set to expire on Deribit.$BTC: ~$1.74B notional | Put/Call: 1.10 | Max Pain: $76,000$ETH: ~$394M notional | Put/Call: 0.95 | Max Pain: $2,325 BTC spot pinned right at max pain. ETH trading… pic.twitter.com/UC2GkTnBMb — Deribit (@DeribitOfficial) May 1, 2026 In the past 24 hours, the put-call ratio for Bitcoin trading activity climbed to 0.73, while overall volume dropped. The Federal Reserve’s decision to hold interest rates unchanged contributed to the slowdown. Ethereum Sits Below Its Own Pain Point Ethereum is facing similar pressure. More than 175,000 ETH options worth $400 million are expiring on Deribit today, with a put-call ratio of 0.95. In the last 24 hours alone, put volume rose sharply past call volume, pushing that ratio to 1.17 — a sign traders are adjusting for potential downside. What makes Ethereum’s situation slightly different is where it’s trading relative to max pain. The ETH max pain price is $2,325, but the token was changing hands around $2,284 at the time of writing — already below that level. Its 24-hour range ran from $2,232 to $2,293. Trading volume fell 45% over the past day. Broader Pressures Weigh On Crypto Markets The options expiry is not happening in a vacuum. US PCE inflation came in at a three-year high of 3.5%, rattling broader markets and prompting profit-taking across crypto. Oil prices rose to $106 a barrel as the US maintained a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Reports indicate US President Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s offer to end the standoff, with reports of a possible escalation adding to market unease. Related Reading: Bitcoin Bull Run Brewing: ATH In Sight By Late 2026: Analyst Together, those factors have kept buyers cautious. Crypto markets saw widespread selling after the inflation data dropped, and uncertainty around the geopolitical situation has not eased. Whether today’s options expiry adds to that pressure — or passes without incident — may depend on whether Bitcoin can hold above the $76,000 mark when contracts settle. Featured image from Gemini, chart from TradingView
2 May 2026, 00:57
TAO Technical Analysis May 2, 2026: Support and Resistance Levels
TAO is above the primary support at $270.60 and $259.59, testing resistances at $272.73 and $288.04. While BTC's sideways trend affects TAO, MTF confluence points to upside at $351.
2 May 2026, 00:51
Bitcoin faces quantum threat as PACTs method proposed
🚨 Dan Robinson at Paradigm unveiled PACTs to shield Bitcoin from future quantum threats. The PACTs method lets holders protect their BTC without moving funds. Continue Reading: Bitcoin faces quantum threat as PACTs method proposed The post Bitcoin faces quantum threat as PACTs method proposed appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
2 May 2026, 00:30
Everything On Cardano Depends On This, IOG Warns
Input Output Group has put Cardano’s maintenance layer at the center of its latest governance pitch, arguing that the network’s future upgrades, applications and daily operations all depend on sustained funding for core infrastructure work. In a post on X, IOG said the effort is led by Michael Karg and covers “Rigorous Testing/QA and Performance tuning,” “Bug fixes & security patches,” and “Node, network and community support.” The message was deliberately blunt: “Everything on Cardano depends on this.” Everything on Cardano depends on this.Led by Michael Karg: → Rigorous Testing/QA and Performance tuning→ Bug fixes & security patches→ Node, network and community support The foundation that keeps billions in value running.Watch the video below and read the full… pic.twitter.com/343oG64EPB — Input Output Group (@IOGroup) April 30, 2026 Why This Proposal Is Crucial For Cardano The proposal, published on the Momentum Cardano site, frames maintenance as the baseline condition for the rest of the ecosystem. It describes the initiative as “core platform maintenance, support, and operational infrastructure for the Cardano network,” with a scope that runs from Q3 2026 through Q1 2027. The proposal’s treasury ask is ₳62,134,630. The central argument is not that maintenance is a new feature, but that it is the layer that makes feature delivery possible. The proposal states: “Every proposal in this portfolio depends on one thing: a stable, reliable, operational Cardano network. Maintenance is the foundation everything else is built on.” It adds that Cardano “powers billions of dollars in value and thousands of applications across a global user base,” making continued codebase upkeep, security work and predictable releases a matter of operational stewardship rather than optional spending. The proposal says the programme covers disaster recovery, knowledge sharing through the Cardano Blueprint, security reviews, monitoring data and performance metrics, all of which are to be published transparently. The underlying message is clear: new capabilities can only ship safely if the base layer remains stable. The funded work is broad. According to the proposal, the maintenance envelope includes node bugfixing and architecture, DevOps and infrastructure, monitoring, documentation, open-source support, performance, quality assurance, release support and security, and component maintenance. That translates into work on CI/CD systems, compiler and platform compatibility, testnets, mainnet monitoring, global mempool data, GitHub issue triage, ledger performance, benchmarking, incident management, Plutus Core updates, DB-Sync consistency and Cardano API/CLI upkeep. IOG also emphasizes that these deliverables are not staged as a conventional roadmap . The proposal says all deliverables are continuous and “run for the full duration of the funded period,” with no sequential phasing or quarterly gating. In other words, the request is structured around parallel operational coverage rather than discrete milestone releases. The proposal includes a direct defense of the size of the line item. “People ask why Maintenance is the biggest line item. The answer is simple: everything else depends on it. Every stake pool operator, every DApp, every transaction on Cardano runs on the work this team does every day.” A second quote from Christos Palaskas, the operator of the Skepsis Pool, makes the same point from a stake-pool perspective. “I’ve been running my stake pool Skepsis for 5+ years now. There have been numerous occasions where improvements to the node were welcomed with relief. There have been memory footprint improvements, security fixes, new features.” He warned that Cardano must keep maintaining the node “or we will not survive the next storm.” At press time, ADA traded at $0.2476.
2 May 2026, 00:25
Trump Iran Policy: No Premature Withdrawal, Warning of Resurgent Problems
BitcoinWorld Trump Iran Policy: No Premature Withdrawal, Warning of Resurgent Problems President Donald Trump has firmly stated that the United States will not pursue a premature withdrawal from its current stance regarding Iran. He warned that such a move would only allow underlying problems to resurface. This declaration reinforces a core tenet of his administration’s foreign policy approach toward the Middle East. Trump Confirms No Premature Withdrawal from Iran Policy Speaking from the White House, Trump emphasized that any hasty exit from the current strategy would be a critical mistake. He argued that it would undo the progress made and give Iran an opportunity to resume activities that threaten regional stability. This statement aligns with his long-standing position that the US must maintain leverage in negotiations. The president’s comments come amid ongoing discussions about the future of US-Iran relations. Many analysts view this as a signal that the administration intends to keep maximum pressure on Tehran. The focus remains on preventing Iran from developing nuclear capabilities and supporting proxy forces. Background of US-Iran Tensions Under Trump The relationship between the United States and Iran has been fraught with tension since the 1979 hostage crisis. However, Trump’s tenure marked a sharp departure from the Obama-era nuclear deal. In 2018, the US withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This decision reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran. Since then, Iran has accelerated its nuclear program. It has enriched uranium to levels far beyond the deal’s limits. The Trump administration has responded with a strategy of “maximum pressure.” This includes economic sanctions and military deterrence. The goal is to force Iran back to the negotiating table for a more comprehensive agreement. Key elements of this strategy include: Economic sanctions targeting Iran’s oil exports and banking sector. Military presence in the Persian Gulf to deter aggression. Diplomatic isolation of Iran at international forums. Support for anti-Iranian groups in the region. Implications of a Premature Withdrawal from Iran Trump’s warning about a premature withdrawal carries significant implications. Experts argue that leaving the current pressure campaign too early would allow Iran to rebuild its nuclear infrastructure. It would also embolden its support for militant groups in Lebanon, Yemen, and Syria. A premature exit could also damage US credibility with allies. Many European nations have urged a return to diplomacy. However, Trump insists that only a strong stance will produce a lasting deal. He believes that any sign of weakness would be exploited by Tehran. The president’s statement directly addresses concerns from critics who argue that the current policy is too aggressive. He counters that a soft approach would lead to a repeat of past failures. The JCPOA, he claims, did not address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its destabilizing regional activities. Expert Analysis on US Iran Strategy 2025 Foreign policy experts have weighed in on Trump’s declaration. Dr. James Miller, a Middle East scholar at the Institute for Strategic Studies, notes that the administration is committed to a long-term approach. “The president is signaling that he will not be rushed into a deal that leaves key issues unresolved,” Miller says. Other analysts point to the domestic political context. Trump’s base supports a tough line on Iran. Any perception of retreat could alienate voters. This makes the “no premature withdrawal” stance both a policy and a political imperative. Timeline of key events: Date Event 2015 JCPOA signed between Iran and P5+1 2018 US withdraws from JCPOA, reimposes sanctions 2020 US kills Iranian General Qasem Soleimani 2021 Iran enriches uranium to 60% purity 2025 Trump reiterates no premature withdrawal Regional and Global Reactions to Trump’s Iran Warning The announcement has drawn mixed reactions globally. Israel welcomed the statement, viewing it as a commitment to countering Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates also expressed support. They see a strong US stance as vital for their security. European allies, however, have expressed caution. France, Germany, and the UK have continued to push for a diplomatic solution. They worry that prolonged pressure could lead to a military confrontation. Russia and China have criticized the US approach, calling for a return to the JCPOA. Iran’s response has been defiant. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has stated that Iran will not negotiate under pressure. The Iranian government continues to expand its nuclear program. It also maintains its support for regional proxies. Economic and Security Impacts of the Iran Policy The no premature withdrawal policy has direct economic consequences. Sanctions have severely impacted Iran’s economy. Inflation is high, and the rial has lost significant value. However, Iran has adapted by increasing trade with China and Russia. Security-wise, the region remains volatile. The US maintains a military presence in the Gulf. Incidents of harassment by Iranian speedboats have occurred. There is a constant risk of escalation. Analysts warn that a miscalculation could trigger a broader conflict. Key impacts include: Oil markets face uncertainty due to supply disruptions. Shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz remain vulnerable. Proxy forces continue to attack US allies. Nuclear proliferation risks increase in the Middle East. Conclusion President Trump’s firm stance on no premature withdrawal from Iran underscores his administration’s commitment to a hardline policy. The warning that problems would resurface highlights the perceived risks of any early retreat. As the situation evolves, the world watches closely. The outcome will shape Middle East security for years to come. The US Iran strategy remains a central pillar of Trump’s foreign policy legacy. FAQs Q1: What did President Trump say about a premature withdrawal from Iran? A: Trump stated that the US will not make a premature withdrawal from its current Iran policy. He warned that doing so would allow the problems to resurface. Q2: Why does Trump oppose a premature withdrawal from Iran? A: He believes that leaving too early would undo progress and give Iran an opportunity to resume activities that threaten regional stability. Q3: What is the current US Iran strategy in 2025? A: The strategy involves maintaining maximum economic pressure through sanctions, a military deterrent presence, and diplomatic isolation of Iran until a comprehensive deal is reached. Q4: How has Iran responded to Trump’s policy? A: Iran has been defiant, expanding its nuclear program and refusing to negotiate under pressure. It has also increased trade with China and Russia to bypass sanctions. Q5: What are the risks of a premature withdrawal from Iran? A: Risks include Iran rebuilding its nuclear infrastructure, emboldening its support for militant groups, damaging US credibility with allies, and potentially leading to a military conflict. This post Trump Iran Policy: No Premature Withdrawal, Warning of Resurgent Problems first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
