hodler

3 Apr 2026, 14:31

Shiba Inu Price Forms New Support as SHIB Netflow Jumps 76%

Shiba Inu price has recorded a recent breakout as netflow flips positive.

3 Apr 2026, 14:30

AI Content Moderation Breakthrough: Moonbounce Secures $12M to Build Real-Time Safety Guardrails

BitcoinWorld AI Content Moderation Breakthrough: Moonbounce Secures $12M to Build Real-Time Safety Guardrails In a significant move to address the escalating crisis of online safety, Moonbounce, a startup pioneering real-time AI content moderation, has exclusively revealed to Bitcoin World a $12 million funding round. This investment, co-led by Amplify Partners and StepStone Group, fuels the company’s mission to transform static policy documents into executable code, creating an immediate safety layer for user-generated and AI-created content. Consequently, the funding arrives as platforms face mounting legal and reputational pressure from high-profile moderation failures. Moonbounce’s AI Content Moderation Solution Moonbounce’s core innovation is its “policy as code” approach. The company trains a proprietary large language model (LLM) to ingest a customer’s written safety policies. Subsequently, this system evaluates content at the precise moment of generation—whether from a human user or an AI chatbot. It delivers an enforcement decision in under 300 milliseconds. Therefore, this shift from reactive, delayed human review to proactive, instant machine enforcement represents a fundamental change in digital trust and safety infrastructure. The system offers flexible enforcement actions based on customer needs. For instance, it can: Block high-risk content instantly before any user sees it. Slow distribution of borderline content, queuing it for later human review. Provide detailed reasoning for its decisions, aiding transparency. Currently, Moonbounce serves three primary sectors: social and dating apps with user-generated content, AI companion and character platforms, and AI image generation services. The company already processes over 40 million daily reviews for more than 100 million daily active users across its client base. The Foundational Problem in Modern Moderation Moonbounce CEO Brett Levenson conceived the idea after experiencing the profound flaws in legacy systems during his tenure leading business integrity at Facebook. He discovered human reviewers worked with poorly translated, lengthy policy documents. They then had mere seconds to make complex decisions on flagged content, achieving accuracy rates only “slightly better than 50%.” “It was kind of like flipping a coin,” Levenson told Bitcoin World. “This was many days after the harm had already occurred anyway.” This reactive model is critically inadequate against today’s well-resourced, agile adversarial actors. Moreover, the explosive adoption of generative AI has exponentially increased the volume and sophistication of harmful content, making manual review entirely unsustainable. Investor Confidence in a Critical Need The funding underscores a growing consensus that external, specialized safety infrastructure is essential. “Content moderation has always been a problem that plagued large online platforms, but now with LLMs at the heart of every application, this challenge is even more daunting,” said Lenny Pruss, General Partner at Amplify Partners. “We invested in Moonbounce because we envision a world where objective, real-time guardrails become the enabling backbone of every AI-mediated application.” This external approach offers a key advantage. Moonbounce’s system operates as a neutral third party between the user and the AI. Unlike the chatbot itself, which must manage vast conversational context, Moonbounce’s model focuses solely on rule enforcement at runtime. This separation of concerns leads to faster, more consistent, and less biased safety decisions. Turning Safety into a Product Advantage Traditionally, content moderation has been a costly, backend compliance function. However, Levenson argues Moonbounce enables safety to become a core product feature and differentiator. “Safety can actually be a product benefit,” he explained. “It just never has been because it’s always a thing that happens later, not a thing you can actually build into your product.” Early customers are validating this thesis. For example, Tinder’s head of trust and safety reported a 10x improvement in detection accuracy using similar LLM-powered services. Moonbounce’s clients include AI companion startup Channel AI, image generation platform Civitai, and character roleplay services Dippy AI and Moescape. The Road Ahead: From Blocking to Steering Moonbounce’s next development phase focuses on “iterative steering.” This advanced capability, inspired by tragic incidents like the 2024 case of a teen obsessed with a Character AI chatbot, moves beyond simple content blocking. Instead, the system would intercept a potentially harmful conversation in real-time and intelligently redirect it. The technology would modify user prompts to steer the chatbot toward a more supportive and helpful response. “We hope to… take the user’s prompt and modify it to force the chatbot to be not just an empathetic listener, but a helpful listener in those situations,” Levenson said. This represents a more nuanced, interventionist model of AI safety. Conclusion Moonbounce’s $12 million funding round signals a pivotal shift in how the tech industry approaches AI content moderation. By translating vague policies into executable code and acting at the speed of generation, the startup offers a scalable path forward for platform safety. As generative AI becomes ubiquitous, the demand for robust, real-time guardrails will only intensify. Moonbounce’s technology, built from firsthand experience with systemic failures, positions it as a critical player in building a safer, more trustworthy digital ecosystem where safety is integral to the user experience. FAQs Q1: What is “policy as code” in AI content moderation? “Policy as code” is Moonbounce’s methodology for converting written platform safety rules into machine-executable logic. This allows an AI system to automatically and instantly evaluate content against those rules at the moment it is generated, rather than relying on slow, inconsistent human review of policy documents. Q2: How fast is Moonbounce’s AI moderation system? The system is designed to evaluate content and provide an enforcement response in 300 milliseconds or less. This real-time speed is crucial for preventing the spread of harmful content on fast-moving social platforms and interactive AI chats. Q3: What types of companies use Moonbounce’s services? Moonbounce primarily serves three verticals: platforms with user-generated content (like dating apps), AI companies building chatbots or companions, and AI image and video generation services. Its customers include Channel AI, Civitai, Dippy AI, and Moescape. Q4: What is “iterative steering”? Iterative steering is an advanced capability Moonbounce is developing. Instead of just blocking harmful content, the system would intercept a risky conversation with an AI chatbot and dynamically modify the user’s prompts in real-time. The goal is to steer the interaction toward a more positive, supportive, and helpful outcome. Q5: Why is external AI content moderation important? An external, third-party moderation system operates independently from the core AI model. It isn’t burdened by the chatbot’s need to remember long conversation histories, allowing it to focus solely on safety rule enforcement. This separation can reduce bias, increase consistency, and provide a specialized layer of protection that internal teams may struggle to build at scale. This post AI Content Moderation Breakthrough: Moonbounce Secures $12M to Build Real-Time Safety Guardrails first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

3 Apr 2026, 14:29

Ripple Joins SWIFT Messaging Network and Banking Tools: Key Details

Ripple has moved further into corporate treasury software through GTreasury, the treasury platform it agreed to buy for $1 billion in October 2025. Ripple launched Digital Asset Accounts and Unified Treasury inside Ripple Treasury, giving finance teams one system for fiat balances and digital assets such as XRP and RLUSD. Ripple Treasury’s partner materials also list the SWIFT Certified Partner Program, Alliance Lite2 hosting, and SWIFTRef tools for IBAN and ABA lookups. At the same time, Ripple Treasury supports SWIFT messaging, bank connectivity, and digital asset accounts for XRP and RLUSD after the GTreasury acquisition. Ripple Expands Treasury Software After the GTreasury Deal Ripple announced its $1 billion acquisition of GTreasury on October 16, 2025, positioning the move as a push into the corporate treasury market. The company described GTreasury as a long-established treasury management provider with more than four decades of experience, more than 1,000 customers, and operations across 160 countries. Ripple also framed the acquisition around real-time liquidity management, cross-border payments, and broader access to digital-asset infrastructure for finance teams. That expansion moved forward on April 1, 2026, when Ripple introduced Digital Asset Accounts and Unified Treasury within Ripple Treasury. The launch allows CFOs and treasury teams to view, hold, receive, and manage fiat and digital liquidity in one system instead of splitting those tasks across separate platforms. Ripple also stated that the same framework supports XRP and RLUSD balances, real-time valuation, and consolidated reporting across bank and custody relationships. SWIFT Connectivity in Messaging, Hosting, and Reference Data Ripple Treasury’s partner page lists SWIFT as a connectivity partner and states that the platform is part of the SWIFT Certified Partner Program. Ripple Treasury offers global bank connectivity and hosting options for SWIFT’s Alliance Lite2 platform. Also, treasury users can access SWIFTRef data for IBAN and ABA lookups directly within the workflow. Other connectivity options on the platform include SWIFT, EBICS, SFTP, APIs, and alternative networks through Fides. SWIFT’s own partner directory adds an important detail to that arrangement. The directory explains that companies in the Lite2 for Business Applications Programme offer their own business applications integrated with SWIFT’s cloud-based Alliance Lite2 service. Therefore, end users can obtain indirect connectivity to the SWIFT messaging network through that provider. Banking Tools Broaden the Platform Ripple Treasury is building around multiple channels. J.P. Morgan appears as a bank partner for intraday and historical balance data through an Account Balances API integration, while Goldman Sachs Asset Management appears through the Mosaic investment platform for treasury and liquidity workflows. Those links show that Ripple Treasury is positioning itself as a treasury operating layer that can connect banks, payment channels, market data, and treasury software functions in one place. Ripple’s April 1 product launch adds the digital-asset side to that structure. Unified Treasury provides users with a single dashboard for cash and digital assets across multiple providers, while Digital Asset Accounts enable finance teams to create and manage Ripple-native digital asset accounts directly within the platform. The framework will expand toward cross-border and intercompany settlement and yield products tied to stablecoins and digital assets. Ripple Treasury handled $13 trillion in payment volume in 2025, giving the platform a large existing base for any future digital-asset rollout.

3 Apr 2026, 14:25

Binance Delists Six Perpetual Futures Pairs Including OL/USDT: Critical Trading Update

BitcoinWorld Binance Delists Six Perpetual Futures Pairs Including OL/USDT: Critical Trading Update In a significant move affecting cryptocurrency derivatives traders, Binance, the world’s largest digital asset exchange, has announced the impending delisting of six perpetual futures contracts, including the OL/USDT pair. This critical update, scheduled for early April 2025, follows the exchange’s established protocols for maintaining a healthy and compliant trading ecosystem. Consequently, traders must prepare for the removal of specific leveraged instruments from the platform’s extensive offerings. Binance Announces Delisting of Key Perpetual Futures Pairs Binance formally communicated the delisting schedule to its global user base on March 25, 2025. The exchange will execute the removal in two distinct phases. Firstly, on April 8, 2025, at precisely 8:30 a.m. UTC, the platform will delist four USDT-margined perpetual contracts. These contracts include OL/USDT , HIPPO/USDT , RLS/USDT , and PUFFER/USDT . Subsequently, on April 9, 2025, at the same time, Binance will remove two USDⓈ-Margined perpetual futures: WIF/USD and WLD/USD . The exchange provided a clear timeline for user actions. Specifically, all open positions for these pairs must be closed before the delisting times. Moreover, Binance will automatically settle any remaining positions at the official delisting time. The exchange will use the fair mark price for this settlement to protect users from unnecessary volatility. Following this, the exchange will cancel all pending orders for the affected pairs. Finally, Binance will remove the trading pairs from the Futures interface entirely. Understanding the Context of Exchange Delistings Delistings represent a standard operational procedure for major cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance. These actions are not arbitrary; they typically follow a rigorous, periodic review process. Exchanges evaluate trading pairs against a multifaceted set of criteria to ensure market quality and user protection. Key factors in this review often include: Liquidity and Trading Volume: Consistently low volume can lead to poor price discovery and increased slippage. Project Development and Commitment: The ongoing health and activity of the underlying blockchain project. Network Stability and Security: Incidents like frequent network halts or security vulnerabilities. Responsiveness to Due Diligence Requests: The project team’s cooperation with the exchange’s compliance checks. Evidence of Fraudulent or Manipulative Conduct: Any signs of wash trading or market manipulation. Regulatory Compliance: Adherence to evolving global regulatory standards. Historically, Binance and other top-tier exchanges have conducted similar reviews quarterly or semi-annually. This process helps maintain a robust marketplace by removing underperforming or non-compliant assets. Therefore, while impactful for specific traders, these delistings generally aim to uphold the integrity of the broader trading environment. Expert Analysis on Market Impact and Trader Strategy Market analysts note that the delisting of perpetual futures contracts typically has a more contained impact than the removal of spot trading pairs. Perpetual futures are derivative instruments, meaning their delisting does not directly affect the ability to hold the underlying asset on the spot market. However, the action can influence market sentiment and liquidity for those specific derivatives. Data from previous delisting cycles shows a common pattern. Trading volume for the affected pairs often declines in the days leading up to the removal. Furthermore, funding rates may become volatile as traders adjust their positions. Experts consistently advise users to proactively manage their risk. The primary recommendation is to close positions well before the deadline to avoid automatic settlement at a potentially unfavorable price. Traders seeking continued exposure might explore alternative venues where the pairs remain listed or consider using different derivative products, such as quarterly futures, if available. Comparative Overview of Affected Trading Pairs The following table provides a snapshot of the affected pairs and their delisting schedule, based on Binance’s official announcement. Trading Pair Contract Type Delisting Date & Time (UTC) OL/USDT USDT-Margined Perpetual April 8, 2025, 08:30 HIPPO/USDT USDT-Margined Perpetual April 8, 2025, 08:30 RLS/USDT USDT-Margined Perpetual April 8, 2025, 08:30 PUFFER/USDT USDT-Margined Perpetual April 8, 2025, 08:30 WIF/USD USDⓈ-Margined Perpetual April 9, 2025, 08:30 WLD/USD USDⓈ-Margined Perpetual April 9, 2025, 08:30 This structured removal allows the exchange’s systems to handle the technical process efficiently. It also gives traders clear, separate deadlines for two groups of assets. Importantly, the delisting of these perpetual futures contracts does not imply any change to the availability of these tokens on Binance Spot, unless a separate announcement is made. Users should always consult the official Binance Announcements page for the most current and authoritative information. Conclusion Binance’s decision to delist six perpetual futures pairs, including OL/USDT, underscores the exchange’s ongoing commitment to market quality and regulatory adherence. This procedural update requires immediate attention from active derivatives traders holding positions in the affected contracts. By providing advance notice and a clear settlement process, Binance aims to ensure a smooth transition. Ultimately, such periodic reviews are a hallmark of mature financial ecosystems, designed to prune low-quality offerings and protect users from illiquid or problematic markets. Traders must always stay informed about exchange announcements and manage their portfolios accordingly to navigate the dynamic cryptocurrency landscape effectively. FAQs Q1: What should I do if I have an open position in OL/USDT perpetual futures? A1: You must actively close your OL/USDT perpetual futures position before 8:30 a.m. UTC on April 8, 2025. If you do not, Binance will automatically settle your position at the fair mark price at the delisting time. Q2: Will the delisting of these perpetual futures affect the spot trading of these tokens? A2: No, this announcement specifically concerns perpetual futures contracts. The availability of OL, HIPPO, RLS, PUFFER, WIF, and WLD on Binance Spot remains unchanged unless a separate spot delisting notice is published. Q3: Why is Binance delisting these particular pairs? A3: While Binance has not disclosed specific reasons for each pair, such decisions typically follow a periodic review based on factors like low liquidity, poor trading volume, concerns about the underlying project’s health, or compliance with regulatory standards. Q4: Can I still trade these perpetual futures pairs on other exchanges? A4: Possibly. The availability of specific perpetual futures contracts varies by exchange. Traders would need to check other derivative trading platforms to see if these exact pairs are listed elsewhere. Q5: What happens to my pending orders for these pairs? A5: All pending orders (e.g., limit orders, stop-loss orders) for the six affected perpetual futures pairs will be automatically canceled by Binance at the respective delisting times on April 8 and April 9, 2025. This post Binance Delists Six Perpetual Futures Pairs Including OL/USDT: Critical Trading Update first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

3 Apr 2026, 14:22

What Is Glamsterdam? Ethereum’s 2026 Upgrade to On-Chain Block Building Explained

Ethereum’s last two major upgrades were focused squarely on Layer 2s. Glamsterdam, targeted to ship in H1 2026, is about improving Layer 1 — not just in terms of speed and efficiency but also the entire block production process. With execution increasingly migrating to L2s and Ethereum itself taking shape as the ecosystem’s underlying settlement and coordination layer, the question of who controls block production and under what rules is more important now than ever. Ethereum’s latest upgrade, Glamsterdam , is targeted to go live in H1 2026, the third hard fork in a year. The two previous upgrades — Pectra and Fusaka , which deployed in May and December 2025 respectively — were primarily oriented toward Layer 2 scaling. Glamsterdam uniquely targets the base layer itself, addressing how blocks are built, who builds them and how the network orders and processes transactions. At first glance, Glamsterdam could be mistaken for a straightforward performance upgrade, centred mainly on higher throughput, larger gas limits and lower fees. At a deeper level, however, it gets right to the heart of how Ethereum wants its base layer to function: not simply as a place for settling transactions, but as a predictable and coherent system whose most important market functions — today handled off-chain — are increasingly integrated within the protocol. Developers call this “enshrinement,” and for institutions evaluating Ethereum as settlement infrastructure, it arguably represents the most significant set of changes since The Merge . The Off-Chain Market Behind Ethereum’s Block Production Ethereum’s block production today looks quite different from the protocol’s original design. After The Merge in 2022, Ethereum moved to proof-of-stake , with validators assigned the right to propose blocks while the task of building them, selecting and ordering transactions, became a separate, specialised activity. Since then, proposer-builder separation (PBS) has come to account for the vast majority of Ethereum’s block production , with validators using third-party relay infrastructure to source blocks from specialised builders. Builders compete to assemble the most profitable blocks, with relays acting as intermediaries that pass block contents to validators without advance disclosure. Over time, that builder market has become highly concentrated, with studies estimating the top three builders control more than 80% of all PBS blocks . The result is a transaction ordering process that has itself become profitable, driven by maximal extractable value (MEV). A growing ecosystem of bots and specialised builders now compete for that value, often through arbitrage, liquidations and other ordering-based opportunities, turning block production into an off-chain market with its own economic logic and trade-offs. Glamsterdam’s Two Core Changes Glamsterdam’s two key proposals replace market functions that evolved informally outside Ethereum’s protocol with more explicit, rule-bound equivalents on-chain. The first, Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (EIP-7732) , moves the builder market into the protocol itself. Currently, validators trust relays not to manipulate or reveal block contents, a trust assumption sitting entirely outside protocol rules. Under ePBS, builders cryptographically seal their blocks and commit to a bid. Validators select the highest bid without seeing transaction contents, and the block is only revealed after the commitment is locked in. The result is a block-building market subject to the same consensus rules as the rest of the network, auditable and rule-bound rather than operating on the goodwill of intermediaries. Block-Level Access Lists (EIP-7928) address execution throughput. Ethereum currently processes transactions sequentially because it cannot predict in advance which storage slots each will touch. BALs make that information explicit at the block level, allowing transactions that do not interfere with one another to be processed in parallel. Former Ethereum Foundation co-executive director Tomasz Stańczak has indicated the resulting gas limit increase will be phased, reaching 100 million per block initially and 200 million once ePBS is fully operational, putting Ethereum on a path toward a throughput of 10,000 transactions per second (TPS) — many times faster than current levels. Glamsterdam also bundles a package of gas repricing EIPs projected to lead to a roughly 78% reduction in fees. What Glamsterdam Doesn’t Solve ePBS makes MEV more transparent and moves it on-chain, a real improvement which doesn’t, however, remove the underlying incentive. Under the current relay-based system, block construction depends heavily on off-chain coordination and trust. ePBS largely eliminates that but it does not remove the economic incentive to extract value from transaction ordering — it simply shifts where and how builders compete for it. A January 2026 academic paper modelling ePBS in the presence of MEV shows exactly how that shift plays out: while it reduces validator-side concentration, it “significantly amplifies profit and content centralisation” among builders, because access to private order flow still confers a structural bidding edge that compounds over time. The sophistication required to build blocks under ePBS with BALs may itself become a centralisation vector, favouring large-scale builders with low-latency infrastructure. Another concern is the free option problem. A builder can withhold their block payload after committing to a bid if late-arriving MEV makes abandoning it more profitable. Academic modelling estimates this affects roughly 0.82% of blocks on average , rising to around 6% during volatile periods. The changes also carry implementation risk. ePBS and BALs together represent a substantial increase in consensus-layer complexity, moving more block-building and execution logic into the protocol itself. That may make the system more legible, but it also creates a broader surface for bugs, edge cases and consensus failures, especially given that neither feature has yet been proven at mainnet scale. Vitalik Buterin’s post-Glamsterdam roadmap , which includes FOCIL (confirmed as the headliner for the Hegota upgrade later in 2026) and encrypted mempools as subsequent steps, is the clearest sign that ePBS is a foundation, not an end in itself. Why Institutions Are Watching For institutions, Glamsterdam’s significance is less about the fee reduction and more about what auditable block production means in practice. By mid-2025, over 50% of high-value Ethereum transactions were being routed through private channels specifically to avoid MEV extraction, a workaround that suggests the current system does not always offer the level of predictability some participants require. Protocol-enforced block ordering gives compliance and risk teams a legible, rule-bound system they can model and audit. Combined with Ethereum’s twice-annual upgrade cadence and Hegota already planned for late 2026, it signals an infrastructure trajectory institutions can plan around. The wider significance is structural. If L2s in the future handle most execution while L1 serves as the settlement base, then the quality of L1 block production matters more, not less. The concern is not retail throughput on rollups but whether the coordination layer beneath them is predictable enough to anchor compliant, auditable activity at scale. Glamsterdam does not displace Layer 2 networks. Even at 200 million gas per block, L2s remain cheaper for cost-sensitive activity and offer sub-second finality that L1 cannot match. The more likely outcome is a cleaner division of labour, with L2s handling execution and L1 serving as the settlement anchor. Glamsterdam will not resolve every remaining tension in Ethereum’s architecture. The competitive dynamics created by MEV-driven block production migrate more than they disappear, and the added complexity carries genuine implementation risk. But market functions that developed informally outside the protocol are being integrated, made legible, and placed under the same rules as everything else. For an infrastructure layer that institutions are looking towards to anchor compliant financial activity, that is a significant step forward. The post What Is Glamsterdam? Ethereum’s 2026 Upgrade to On-Chain Block Building Explained appeared first on Bitfinex blog .

3 Apr 2026, 14:22

Binance to remove multiple altcoin futures pairs after new listing decisions

Binance will delist several altcoin futures pairs and expand stock-tied futures contracts. Support for token-margined positions in WIF and WLD will end on April 9. Continue Reading: Binance to remove multiple altcoin futures pairs after new listing decisions The post Binance to remove multiple altcoin futures pairs after new listing decisions appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .