hodler

15 Apr 2026, 06:25

Quantum Resistance Upgrade: Justin Sun’s Critical Security Move for TRX Network Protection

BitcoinWorld Quantum Resistance Upgrade: Justin Sun’s Critical Security Move for TRX Network Protection In a significant cybersecurity announcement from Singapore on March 15, 2025, Tron founder Justin Sun revealed plans for a groundbreaking quantum resistance upgrade for the TRX network, marking a proactive defense against emerging quantum computing threats that could potentially undermine current blockchain security models. Quantum Resistance Upgrade: Tron’s Proactive Security Strategy Justin Sun announced via social media platform X that the Tron network will implement a comprehensive quantum resistance upgrade. This strategic move involves deploying a post-quantum signature method on the Tron mainnet, specifically following standards established by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The announcement comes amid growing concerns within the cryptographic community about quantum computing’s potential to break current encryption methods. Consequently, blockchain networks worldwide face increasing pressure to future-proof their security infrastructure. Industry analysts recognize this development as particularly timely, especially as quantum computing advances accelerate across both academic and corporate research laboratories. Understanding Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards The planned upgrade centers on NIST-standardized algorithms, which represent the culmination of a six-year selection process involving global cryptographic experts. NIST finalized its initial post-quantum cryptography standards in 2024, establishing CRYSTALS-Kyber for key encapsulation and CRYSTALS-Dilithium for digital signatures as primary recommendations. These lattice-based cryptographic systems demonstrate remarkable resistance to quantum attacks while maintaining efficiency for practical implementation. Furthermore, the standardization process involved extensive public scrutiny and multiple rounds of cryptanalysis, ensuring robust security foundations. Transitioning to these standards requires careful planning, as blockchain networks must maintain backward compatibility while introducing new security layers. The table below illustrates key NIST-standardized algorithms relevant to blockchain applications: Algorithm Primary Function Security Category Implementation Status CRYSTALS-Dilithium Digital Signatures Level 2-5 Standardized CRYSTALS-Kyber Key Encapsulation Level 1-5 Standardized Falcon Digital Signatures Level 1-5 Standardized SPHINCS+ Digital Signatures Level 1-5 Standardized The Quantum Computing Threat Timeline Cryptographic experts generally agree that large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers capable of breaking current public-key cryptography remain years away, with most estimates ranging from 10 to 30 years. However, the cybersecurity principle of “store now, decrypt later” presents immediate concerns. Adversaries can currently intercept and store encrypted blockchain transactions, then decrypt them later when quantum computers become sufficiently powerful. This threat particularly affects blockchain networks because: Public nature: All transactions remain permanently visible on public ledgers Long-term value: Cryptographic assets often maintain value for decades Irreversible transactions: Blockchain transactions cannot be reversed once confirmed Therefore, proactive migration to quantum-resistant cryptography represents essential risk management rather than premature optimization. Technical Implementation Challenges and Solutions Implementing post-quantum cryptography on an active blockchain network like Tron presents multiple technical challenges that require sophisticated engineering solutions. First, signature sizes increase significantly with post-quantum algorithms, potentially affecting network bandwidth and storage requirements. For instance, Dilithium signatures range from 2,420 to 4,596 bytes, compared to approximately 64-72 bytes for current ECDSA signatures. Second, computational overhead for signature generation and verification increases, though modern optimizations keep this within practical limits for most applications. The Tron development team will likely employ several strategies to manage these challenges: Hybrid approaches: Combining classical and post-quantum signatures during transition periods Batch verification: Optimizing verification processes for multiple signatures Compression techniques: Reducing signature sizes through advanced mathematical approaches Gradual deployment: Implementing changes through phased network upgrades Additionally, the upgrade must maintain compatibility with existing smart contracts, decentralized applications, and exchange integrations, requiring extensive testing and community coordination. Industry Context and Competitive Landscape Tron’s quantum resistance initiative places it among forward-thinking blockchain projects addressing quantum threats. Several other major networks have announced similar roadmaps or research efforts. Ethereum researchers have published multiple proposals for post-quantum transitions, while Cardano’s development team has incorporated quantum resistance considerations into its long-term research agenda. However, Tron’s commitment to NIST standards provides particular advantages, including: Regulatory alignment: Compliance with U.S. government cybersecurity standards Interoperability benefits: Easier integration with other NIST-compliant systems Security validation: Leveraging extensively reviewed cryptographic primitives Industry confidence: Building trust through standardized approaches This strategic positioning could enhance Tron’s appeal to institutional investors and enterprise users who prioritize long-term security and regulatory compliance. Economic and Market Implications The quantum resistance upgrade carries significant economic implications for the Tron ecosystem. Enhanced security features typically increase network value by reducing risk premiums associated with potential vulnerabilities. Historically, blockchain networks that proactively address security concerns experience positive market reactions, though these effects often manifest gradually rather than immediately. The upgrade may also influence TRX’s positioning within cryptocurrency portfolios, particularly for long-term holders concerned about decade-scale security. Moreover, enterprise adoption often accelerates when blockchain networks demonstrate forward-looking security postures, potentially increasing transaction volume and developer activity on the Tron network. Community and Development Considerations Successful implementation requires careful coordination with Tron’s diverse stakeholder community. The Tron DAO and broader ecosystem participants must approve major protocol changes through established governance processes. Developer education represents another critical component, as application builders need updated documentation, libraries, and testing frameworks for post-quantum cryptography. The transition timeline will likely include multiple testnet deployments, bug bounty programs, and gradual mainnet activation to ensure smooth migration. Community feedback mechanisms will play essential roles in identifying edge cases and usability concerns before full deployment. Conclusion Justin Sun’s announcement of a quantum resistance upgrade for the TRX network represents a strategic, forward-looking security initiative that addresses one of cryptocurrency’s most significant long-term threats. By adopting NIST-standardized post-quantum cryptography, Tron positions itself at the forefront of blockchain security innovation while aligning with established cybersecurity standards. This quantum resistance upgrade demonstrates the network’s commitment to protecting user assets against emerging technological threats, potentially setting new benchmarks for security preparedness across the blockchain industry. The implementation will require careful technical execution and community coordination, but successful deployment could significantly enhance Tron’s long-term viability and institutional appeal in an increasingly quantum-aware digital landscape. FAQs Q1: What exactly is quantum resistance in blockchain? Quantum resistance refers to cryptographic systems designed to remain secure against attacks from both classical and quantum computers, particularly protecting against algorithms like Shor’s algorithm that could break current public-key cryptography. Q2: Why is Tron adopting NIST standards for this upgrade? NIST standards represent extensively reviewed and validated cryptographic approaches developed through multi-year international processes, ensuring robust security, regulatory alignment, and interoperability with other secure systems. Q3: How soon will quantum computers threaten current blockchain security? Most experts estimate large-scale quantum computers capable of breaking current cryptography remain 10-30 years away, but the “store now, decrypt later” threat makes proactive migration necessary today. Q4: Will this upgrade affect TRX transaction speeds or costs? Post-quantum signatures are larger and computationally more intensive, potentially affecting bandwidth and verification times, but optimization techniques and gradual implementation should minimize practical impacts for users. Q5: Are other major blockchain networks implementing similar upgrades? Yes, multiple blockchain projects including Ethereum, Cardano, and Algorand have quantum resistance initiatives, though implementation timelines and specific approaches vary across different networks. This post Quantum Resistance Upgrade: Justin Sun’s Critical Security Move for TRX Network Protection first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

15 Apr 2026, 06:20

South Korean Crypto Exchange Deposits Plunge 27%: A Stark Signal Amid Bitcoin’s Sluggish 2025 Market

BitcoinWorld South Korean Crypto Exchange Deposits Plunge 27%: A Stark Signal Amid Bitcoin’s Sluggish 2025 Market SEOUL, South Korea – March 2025. Investor deposits at South Korea’s five major cryptocurrency exchanges have plunged by a staggering 26.8% over the past year, according to official financial data. This significant decline in crypto exchange deposits coincides directly with a prolonged period of sluggish performance in the broader digital asset market, most notably led by Bitcoin’s price stagnation. The data, sourced from electronic disclosures by South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), reveals a clear trend of capital outflow and heightened investor caution in one of the world’s most active crypto trading hubs. South Korean Crypto Exchange Deposits Experience Sharp Decline The Financial Supervisory Service data provides a precise and verifiable snapshot of the market shift. Consequently, customer deposits held at the quintet of leading exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax—totaled 8.151 trillion won at the end of the last fiscal year. This figure represents a substantial drop from the 11.1285 trillion won recorded at the close of 2024. The reported 2.9775 trillion won decrease translates to billions of US dollars exiting the exchange ecosystem. This movement of funds away from trading platforms serves as a critical liquidity indicator. Market analysts often interpret such declines as a sign of reduced trading activity or a shift toward cold storage solutions by long-term holders. Furthermore, this trend is not isolated. It mirrors broader global patterns observed during crypto market corrections. For instance, exchange net outflows frequently precede or accompany periods of price consolidation. The South Korean market, however, often exhibits amplified volatility due to the famous “Kimchi premium” phenomenon and a retail-dominated investor base. Therefore, the 27% deposit drop provides a magnified view of global sentiment. The data underscores a period of risk aversion and portfolio rebalancing among Korean investors. Analyzing the Impact of the Broader Bitcoin Slump The deposit decline occurred against a backdrop of a tepid cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin, the flagship digital asset, failed to sustain momentum throughout much of the reporting period. Its price action remained range-bound, lacking the decisive bullish catalysts seen in previous cycles. This Bitcoin slump created a ripple effect across the entire altcoin market. Many alternative cryptocurrencies, which often see heightened trading volume on Korean exchanges, experienced even steeper declines. Consequently, the reduced opportunity for profitable trades likely contributed to the deposit withdrawals. Several interconnected factors typically drive such market behavior. First, diminishing price volatility can reduce the appeal of short-term trading. Second, macroeconomic pressures, such as interest rate environments, influence asset allocation. Third, regulatory developments within South Korea itself may have prompted a cautious stance. The FSS has progressively enhanced its oversight of the crypto sector, implementing stricter anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) protocols. While these measures bolster security, they can also temporarily impact user behavior and fund flows. Expert Perspectives on Market Dynamics and Liquidity Financial analysts specializing in Asian digital asset markets point to the deposit data as a key liquidity metric. “Exchange deposits are the lifeblood of daily trading volume,” explains a market strategist from a Seoul-based fintech research firm. “A sustained outflow suggests investors are either moving to self-custody, awaiting clearer market direction, or reallocating to traditional assets. The correlation with Bitcoin’s performance is evident, but the scale of the drop in Korea is particularly noteworthy.” This expert view highlights the data’s significance beyond a simple balance sheet change. The timeline of this decline is also crucial. The year-over-year comparison captures a full market cycle phase. It begins from a period of relative optimism in late 2024 and extends through a subsequent correction and consolidation phase. The table below summarizes the year-end deposit figures for the two periods, illustrating the scale of the change. Exchange Deposits (End of 2024) Deposits (End of Last Year) Change Upbit ~5.2 Trillion Won ~3.8 Trillion Won -27% Bithumb ~3.1 Trillion Won ~2.3 Trillion Won -26% Coinone, Korbit, Gopax ~2.8 Trillion Won ~2.05 Trillion Won -27% Total 11.1285 Trillion Won 8.151 Trillion Won -26.8% This consolidated drop affected all major platforms proportionally. It indicates a market-wide phenomenon rather than issues specific to a single exchange. The uniformity of the decline reinforces the conclusion that external, systemic factors—primarily asset price performance and investor sentiment—are the primary drivers. Regulatory Environment and Future Market Signals The South Korean government continues to refine its regulatory framework for virtual assets. The implementation of the Travel Rule and enhanced reporting requirements for large transactions adds layers of compliance for exchanges and users. Some analysts suggest this evolving landscape may influence deposit trends. However, the dominant consensus links the current outflow directly to market performance. The deposit data serves as a lagging indicator, confirming the cautious behavior that price charts had already suggested. Looking forward, market participants will monitor several signals for a potential reversal. These include: Sustained Bitcoin price recovery: A decisive break above key resistance levels. Renewed institutional interest: Evidence of capital inflows into regulated crypto products. Stabilization of global macro conditions: Particularly regarding inflation and monetary policy. Clarity on South Korean crypto taxation: The scheduled implementation of specific tax rules. Historically, exchange deposit balances have proven to be a cyclical metric. Periods of accumulation on exchanges often precede increased trading activity and volatility. Therefore, while the current 27% decline highlights a phase of contraction, it also sets a new baseline from which future growth can be measured. The health of the South Korean crypto ecosystem remains tied to global trends, but its unique characteristics ensure it will remain a critical market to watch for analysts worldwide. Conclusion The 27% drop in South Korean crypto exchange deposits provides a clear, quantitative measure of the market’s response to the extended Bitcoin slump. This significant capital outflow from major platforms like Upbit and Bithumb underscores a period of risk-off sentiment and reduced speculative trading activity among Korean investors. The data, verified by the Financial Supervisory Service, acts as a stark barometer of local market liquidity and confidence. While influenced by global cryptocurrency trends and domestic regulatory developments, this deposit decline ultimately signals a cautious pause in one of the world’s most vibrant crypto economies. Monitoring the reversal of this trend will be essential for gauging the next phase of market recovery and investor engagement in South Korea’s digital asset space. FAQs Q1: Which South Korean crypto exchanges reported a drop in deposits? The data from the Financial Supervisory Service covered the five largest exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax. All platforms experienced a proportional decline in customer deposit balances. Q2: How much did deposits at South Korean crypto exchanges fall? Total customer deposits across the five major exchanges fell by 26.8%, from 11.1285 trillion won at the end of 2024 to 8.151 trillion won at the end of the last fiscal year. Q3: What is the main reason for the decline in crypto exchange deposits? The primary driver is the broader slump in the cryptocurrency market, particularly Bitcoin’s sluggish price performance, which reduced trading incentives and led investors to withdraw funds or move them to private wallets. Q4: Does this deposit drop only reflect selling and cashing out? Not necessarily. A decrease in exchange deposits can also indicate a move to self-custody (hardware or software wallets) for long-term holding, known as “HODLing,” rather than an outright exit from the crypto market. Q5: How does South Korea’s regulatory environment affect crypto deposits? Stricter regulations, including enhanced KYC/AML checks and the upcoming implementation of crypto taxation, can influence user behavior. However, analysts view the current deposit decline as more directly correlated with market performance than regulatory changes alone. Q6: Is this trend unique to South Korea, or is it a global phenomenon? While the scale is pronounced in South Korea’s retail-driven market, outflows from exchanges during bearish or consolidating market phases are a global trend. The Korean data often provides an amplified signal of broader retail investor sentiment. This post South Korean Crypto Exchange Deposits Plunge 27%: A Stark Signal Amid Bitcoin’s Sluggish 2025 Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

15 Apr 2026, 06:17

Ethereum treasury firm Bitmine reports $3.8 billion Q1 loss in latest filing

The largest corporate ether holder posted a $3.8 billion quarterly loss as its pivot from mining to ETH accumulation continues.

15 Apr 2026, 06:15

BTC Perpetual Futures Long/Short Ratios Reveal Critical Market Sentiment on Top Exchanges

BitcoinWorld BTC Perpetual Futures Long/Short Ratios Reveal Critical Market Sentiment on Top Exchanges Global cryptocurrency markets exhibit a near-perfect equilibrium in trader positioning for Bitcoin perpetual futures contracts, according to the latest 24-hour data from the world’s three largest futures exchanges by open interest. This precise balance between long and short positions provides a fascinating snapshot of current market psychology and potential price direction. Market analysts closely monitor these ratios as leading indicators of sentiment, especially during periods of consolidation or preceding significant volatility. The data, captured on March 21, 2025, offers a granular view of how professional and retail traders are positioning themselves across different trading platforms. Analyzing the BTC Perpetual Futures Long/Short Landscape Perpetual futures, or ‘perps,’ represent a cornerstone of the crypto derivatives market. Unlike traditional futures with set expiry dates, these contracts trade indefinitely, using a funding rate mechanism to tether their price to the underlying spot asset. Consequently, the aggregate long/short ratio for Bitcoin perpetual futures serves as a powerful, real-time gauge of market bias. A ratio above 50% indicates more traders hold bullish long positions, betting on price increases. Conversely, a ratio below 50% signals a bearish majority expecting price declines. The current aggregate figure of 50.04% long versus 49.96% short represents an exceptionally tight balance, rarely seen in such a volatile asset class. This equilibrium suggests a market at a critical inflection point. Major institutional reports frequently cite such data when assessing the risk of a ‘long squeeze’ or ‘short squeeze.’ A long squeeze occurs when over-leveraged long positions are rapidly liquidated during a price drop, accelerating the decline. A short squeeze happens when rising prices force bearish traders to buy back their positions to cover losses, fueling further rallies. The current data implies neither side holds a decisive advantage, potentially setting the stage for a sharp move once new fundamental information enters the market. Exchange-Specific Breakdown: Binance, OKX, and Bybit While the overall market shows balance, significant nuances emerge when examining individual exchange data. Each platform attracts a distinct user demographic, which influences its collective trading behavior. The following table summarizes the key 24-hour ratios: Exchange Long Ratio Short Ratio Net Sentiment Binance 51.68% 48.32% Mildly Bullish OKX 49.51% 50.49% Mildly Bearish Bybit 50.25% 49.75% Neutral to Bullish Aggregate 50.04% 49.96% Neutral Binance , as the global leader by volume and open interest, shows the most pronounced bullish tilt among the trio. Its 51.68% long ratio may reflect the sentiment of its vast retail user base or specific institutional activity on its platform. Historically, Binance’s ratio often leads minor trends due to its market dominance. OKX presents the only net bearish stance at 50.49% short. This divergence is critical for analysts. OKX has a strong user base in Asia, and its sentiment can sometimes presage regional market movements. The slight bearishness could indicate profit-taking after recent gains or concerns about local regulatory developments. Bybit , popular with advanced retail traders, maintains an almost perfect equilibrium, mirroring the overall market. Its user base is often considered highly responsive to technical signals, suggesting the current price level presents no clear technical edge for bulls or bears. The Impact of Funding Rates and Open Interest Experienced traders never view long/short ratios in isolation. They combine this data with two other vital metrics: funding rates and total open interest . The funding rate is the periodic payment exchanged between long and short positions to maintain the contract’s peg to the spot price. Typically, a positive funding rate (paid by longs to shorts) coincides with a high long ratio, indicating traders are paying a premium to maintain bullish bets. Conversely, a negative rate suggests shorts are paying longs. Currently, aggregate funding rates across major exchanges remain relatively neutral, aligning with the balanced long/short data. Meanwhile, total open interest—the sum of all active contracts—remains near yearly highs. This combination of high open interest and neutral sentiment often precedes periods of elevated volatility. When many positions are open but sentiment is split, even a minor catalyst can trigger substantial liquidations on one side of the market. Historical Context and Market Cycle Analysis Comparing current ratios to historical extremes provides essential perspective. During the bull market peak in late 2024, aggregate long ratios frequently exceeded 65%, signaling extreme greed and over-leverage. Conversely, during the capitulation phase of early 2024, short ratios soared above 60%, reflecting pervasive fear. The present neutral zone often acts as a reset point within a larger market cycle. Market structure analysts note that prolonged periods of balance, like the current one, usually resolve with a strong directional trend. The key trigger often comes from macro-economic factors such as: Shifts in U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate policy Movements in the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) Significant on-chain Bitcoin metrics (e.g., exchange outflows, whale accumulation) Global regulatory announcements Furthermore, the maturation of the Bitcoin ETF market in 2024 and 2025 has created a new dynamic. Large ETF flows can now directly impact spot prices, which in turn influences futures market sentiment. Traders now must weigh ETF buying/selling pressure against the sentiment shown in derivatives data. Risk Management Implications for Traders For active traders, this data landscape underscores the importance of rigorous risk management. A neutral aggregate sentiment does not imply low risk; it often indicates high uncertainty. Key strategies employed by professional desks in such environments include: Reducing leverage to avoid sudden liquidation from whipsaw price action. Setting tighter stop-loss orders, as breakouts from consolidation can be rapid. Monitoring exchange-specific divergences for arbitrage or early signal opportunities. Balancing futures positions with spot holdings or options for portfolio hedging. Data from analytics firms like Glassnode and CryptoQuant consistently shows that retail traders suffer the highest liquidation rates during transitions from neutral to trending markets. Therefore, understanding the context behind these long/short ratios is not merely academic—it is a practical tool for capital preservation. Conclusion The latest BTC perpetual futures long/short ratios paint a picture of a cryptocurrency market in a state of cautious equilibrium. The near-perfect 50/50 split across Binance, OKX, and Bybit highlights a collective indecision among traders, awaiting the next major catalyst. While exchange-specific nuances exist, the overarching narrative is one of balance. This data, when combined with neutral funding rates and high open interest, suggests that the market is coiling for a significant move. For investors and traders, this period demands heightened attention to both technical levels and fundamental developments, as the prevailing neutral sentiment on Bitcoin perpetual futures is unlikely to persist indefinitely. FAQs Q1: What is a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract? A Bitcoin perpetual futures contract is a derivative instrument that allows traders to speculate on Bitcoin’s future price without an expiry date. It uses a funding rate mechanism to keep its price aligned with the underlying spot market. Q2: Why is the long/short ratio important? The ratio is a key sentiment indicator. It shows the percentage of traders betting on price increases (long) versus decreases (short). Extreme readings can signal overbought or oversold conditions and potential market reversals. Q3: How often does this data update? Most major exchanges and data aggregators update long/short ratios in real-time or at least every 24 hours. The data cited in this analysis represents a 24-hour snapshot for consistency. Q4: Can the ratio predict Bitcoin’s price direction? While not a perfect predictor, it is a valuable contrarian indicator at extremes. A very high long ratio can signal excessive bullishness and a potential top, while a very high short ratio can indicate extreme fear and a potential bottom. Q5: What is the difference between open interest and the long/short ratio? Open interest is the total number of active derivative contracts. The long/short ratio describes the positioning of the traders within those contracts—whether they are net long or net short. Q6: Does a 50/50 ratio mean the price won’t move? No. A neutral ratio indicates balanced sentiment, not price stability. It often precedes high volatility because the market lacks a clear consensus, making it vulnerable to a decisive move when new information arrives. This post BTC Perpetual Futures Long/Short Ratios Reveal Critical Market Sentiment on Top Exchanges first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

15 Apr 2026, 06:14

Cardano slumps below $0.24 as on-chain signals flash sell-off risk

The crypto market has been bullish over the past few days but Cardano remains one of the most bearish coins in the top 20. The coin lost its place in the top 10 earlier this month and has been underperforming since then. Cardano (ADA) is trading below $0.240 on Wednesday, down by more than 2% in the last 24 hours. On-chain metrics point to a bearish outlook, as a surge in dormant wallet activity and a negative spike in the Network Realized Profit/Loss (NPL) indicator suggest early investors may be offloading tokens, increasing the likelihood of a deeper correction in the near term. ADA stays below $0.2400: On-chain data shows selling pressure Data obtained from Santiment suggests selling pressure for Cardano. Santiment's Network Realized Profit/Loss (NPL) indicator calculates a daily network-level Return On Investment (ROI) based on the coin's on-chain transaction volume, which measures market pain. A surge in a coin’s NPL suggests that the holders are selling their bags at a significant profit. However, strong dips imply that the coin's holders are, on average, realizing losses, suggesting panic sell-offs and investor capitulation. The NPL for Cardano showed a massive dip on Tuesday, indicating that holders, on average, were realizing losses. Furthermore, Santiment’s Age Consumed index also showed an upward spike, suggesting dormant ADA tokens are now being moved (most likely to exchanges). Usually, a surge in dormant wallet activity combined with a negative dip in the NPL indicator leads to massive sell-offs in Cardano. The derivatives data also suggest that the bears are currently in control. CoinGlass' long-to-short ratio for ADA reads 0.95 on Wednesday. This metric has been mostly negative over the past four weeks. A ratio below one indicates bearish sentiment in the market, as traders are betting that the asset price will fall. Cardano price forecast The ADA/USD 4-hour chart is extremely bearish as Cardano is down 8% in the last seven days. ADA is currently trading at $0.239, holding well below the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs). The $0.2450 resistance level continues to cap further upward movement, with the 50-day EMA at $0.262 and the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the latest downswing at $0.271 layering additional overhead supply. A subdued Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the 4-hour chart is around 43, and a slightly negative Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) reading suggests that upside momentum is weak. This implies that rallies are likely to face selling pressure at these resistance levels. If the bulls regain control and the daily candle closes above the $0.2450 resistance level, it would allow ADA to extend its rally towards the 50-day EMA at $0.262 and the 23.6% retracements at $0.271. Further resistance levels lie around $0.299 and the $0.303 area, where the 38.2% Fibonacci retracements clusters with the 100-day EMA. The 200-day EMA at $0.4000 is less likely to play out in the near term as the market conditions remain fragile. However, if the bears remain in control, they would encounter immediate support at the $0.2200 level, where buyers would be expected to defend the latest cycle low if the decline extends. The post Cardano slumps below $0.24 as on-chain signals flash sell-off risk appeared first on Invezz

15 Apr 2026, 06:11

Bitcoin Developers Propose Freezing Quantum Vulnerable BTC

BIP-361 proposes transitioning the network to quantum-resistant addresses and eventually freezing funds held in vulnerable legacy wallets. The proposal builds on BIP-360 and includes a recovery mechanism using zero-knowledge proofs for users who fail to migrate in time. While it caused debate in the community over its implications, Bitcoin’s price remained relatively stable near $74,000. Bitcoin BIP 361 Could Freeze Old BTC A new proposal from cypherpunk Jameson Lopp and a group of Bitcoin researchers caused intense debate in the crypto industry. It attempts to address one of the network’s most existential long-term risks: quantum computing. The draft proposal is known as BIP-361, and it outlines a plan to freeze Bitcoin held in quantum-vulnerable addresses, including an estimated 1.7 million BTC tied to early pay-to-public-key (P2PK) outputs. This includes Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched holdings, which is currently valued at roughly $74 billion. The proposal is of a three-phase roadmap that is designed to transition Bitcoin toward quantum-resistant security. It builds on an earlier proposal, BIP-360, which introduced a new address format intended to eliminate vulnerabilities associated with legacy cryptographic methods. While BIP-360 focuses on protecting newly created coins, BIP-361 addresses the big portion of Bitcoin’s supply that is still exposed unless users actively migrate their funds. Under the plan, the first phase would restrict the creation of new transactions to only quantum-resistant address types after a set activation period. The second phase, which is a bit more controversial, would invalidate legacy signatures entirely after several years, effectively freezing any Bitcoin that remains in vulnerable addresses. A final phase introduces a recovery mechanism using zero-knowledge proofs. This allows users who missed the migration deadline to potentially reclaim their funds if they can prove ownership. BIP-361 (Source: GitHub) Supporters of the proposal argue that it introduces a necessary economic incentive for users to upgrade their holdings. However, critics see it as a fundamental violation of Bitcoin’s core principles, particularly the idea that users should always retain full control over their funds. Some people in the community described the proposal as overly authoritarian. They argue that forcibly freezing coins could set a dangerous precedent. Despite the debate, Bitcoin’s market performance stayed relatively stable but subdued. Over the past 24 hours, Bitcoin traded around the $74,000 level , and saw a slight decline of approximately 0.40%. BTC’s price action over the past 24 hours (Source: CoinCodex) While the immediate impact of quantum computing on Bitcoin is still mostly theoretical, proposals like BIP-361 certainly prove that there is a growing urgency in the developer community to future-proof the network. At the same time, the strong pushback also means that there is still a deeper philosophical divide over how Bitcoin should be handled.