hodler

20 Mar 2026, 16:30

Trump’s AI Framework: A Bold Federal Power Grab That Preempts State Laws and Shifts Safety Burden

BitcoinWorld Trump’s AI Framework: A Bold Federal Power Grab That Preempts State Laws and Shifts Safety Burden WASHINGTON, D.C. — June 9, 2025 — The Trump administration unveiled a sweeping legislative framework on Friday designed to establish a singular, national policy for artificial intelligence. This framework aggressively centralizes regulatory power in Washington by preempting a recent surge of state-level AI laws. Consequently, it fundamentally shifts responsibility for issues like child safety toward parents and away from technology platforms. Trump’s AI Framework Aims for Federal Supremacy The newly proposed framework outlines seven key objectives that prioritize innovation and scaling AI across the United States. Moreover, it explicitly seeks to override stricter regulations emerging from state capitals. A White House statement argues that a uniform national approach is essential. “This framework can only succeed if it is applied uniformly across the United States,” the statement reads. “A patchwork of conflicting state laws would undermine American innovation and our ability to lead in the global AI race.” This move follows an executive order signed by President Trump three months prior. That order directed federal agencies to challenge state AI laws it deemed “onerous.” It also gave the Commerce Department 90 days to compile a list of such laws, potentially tying them to federal funding eligibility. The agency has not yet published that list. The Core Conflict: Federal Power vs. State Experimentation The framework carves out only narrow exceptions for state authority. It preserves state power over general laws like fraud, child protection statutes, zoning, and state government use of AI. However, it draws a firm line against states regulating AI development itself. The administration labels AI development an “inherently interstate” issue tied directly to national security and foreign policy. Critics immediately condemned this approach. They argue states have acted as crucial “sandboxes of democracy,” passing laws to address emerging AI risks more swiftly than the federal government. For example, New York’s RAISE Act and California’s SB-53 mandate that large AI companies establish and publicly document safety protocols. “White House AI czar David Sacks continues to do the bidding of Big Tech at the expense of regular, hardworking Americans,” said Brendan Steinhauser, CEO of The Alliance for Secure AI. “This federal AI framework seeks to prevent states from legislating on AI and provides no path to accountability for AI developers for the harms caused by their products.” Industry Applauds Regulatory Clarity Many in the technology and startup sectors celebrated the proposal. They view it as providing the regulatory certainty needed to build and scale rapidly. “This framework is exactly what startups have been asking for: a clear national standard so they can build fast and scale,” Teresa Carlson, president of General Catalyst Institute, stated. “Founders shouldn’t have to navigate a patchwork of conflicting state AI laws that impede innovation.” The framework proposes a “minimally burdensome national standard.” This aligns with the administration’s broader push to remove barriers to innovation. It is a pro-growth, light-touch approach championed by “accelerationists” like White House AI czar David Sacks, a venture capitalist. Shifting the Burden: Child Safety and Parental Responsibility The framework arrives amid intense national debate over AI and child safety. Several states have passed aggressive laws placing more responsibility on tech companies. The administration’s proposal points in a different direction. It emphasizes parental control over platform accountability. “Parents are best equipped to manage their children’s digital environment and upbringing,” the framework asserts. “The Administration is calling on Congress to give parents tools to effectively do that, such as account controls to protect their children’s privacy and manage their device use.” While it calls on Congress to require AI companies to implement features that “reduce the risks of sexual exploitation and harm to minors,” the language includes qualifiers like “commercially reasonable.” The proposal stops short of laying out clear, enforceable requirements or new liability frameworks for developers. A Liability Shield for AI Developers A critical component of the framework seeks to shield AI developers from certain liabilities. It aims to prevent states from “penaliz[ing] AI developers for a third party’s unlawful conduct involving their models.” This provision is a major priority for the AI industry. It addresses fears of being held responsible for harmful or illegal content generated by their systems. Notably absent from the document are detailed proposals for independent oversight or enforcement mechanisms for novel AI harms. The framework centralizes AI policymaking in Washington while significantly narrowing the space for states to act as early regulators of emerging risks. Navigating Copyright and Free Speech Flashpoints The framework also wades into the contentious areas of copyright and free speech. On copyright, it attempts to find a middle ground. It cites the need for “fair use” to allow AI training on existing works while acknowledging creator protections. This language mirrors arguments made by AI companies facing numerous copyright lawsuits over their training data. On free speech, the framework’s main guardrails focus on preventing government-driven censorship. “Congress should prevent the United States government from coercing technology providers, including AI providers, to ban, compel, or alter content based on partisan or ideological agendas,” it states. This emphasis builds on Trump’s earlier “woke AI” Executive Order. That order pushed federal agencies to adopt AI systems deemed ideologically neutral. The new framework also instructs Congress to provide legal redress for Americans against government agencies that seek to censor expression on AI platforms. Potential for Confusion in Content Moderation Critics warn this approach could create confusion. The line between government censorship and necessary platform moderation for issues like misinformation or public safety risks may become blurred. Samir Jain, vice president of policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology, noted a contradiction. “[The framework] rightly says that the government should not coerce AI companies to ban or alter content based on ‘partisan or ideological agendas,’ yet the Administration’s ‘woke AI’ Executive Order this summer does exactly that.” The framework emerges alongside a lawsuit from AI company Anthropic against the government. Anthropic alleges the Defense Department infringed on its First Amendment rights by labeling it a supply chain risk. The company claims this was retaliation for refusing military use of its AI for mass surveillance or autonomous weapons targeting. Conclusion Trump’s AI framework represents a decisive shift toward federal preemption in technology governance. It prioritizes national innovation and economic competitiveness over localized regulatory experimentation. By shifting burdens like child safety toward parents and shielding developers from certain liabilities, the plan sets the stage for a major congressional debate. The coming months will determine whether this vision of a unified, light-touch federal AI policy can become law, or if resistance from states and consumer advocates will forge a different path. FAQs Q1: What is the main goal of Trump’s new AI framework? The primary goal is to establish a single, national AI policy that overrides state laws. It aims to prevent a “patchwork” of regulations and centralize authority in Washington to promote innovation and U.S. competitiveness. Q2: How does the framework handle child safety online? It emphasizes parental responsibility and tools over strict platform accountability. It calls for features to reduce risks to minors but uses non-binding language like “commercially reasonable” instead of clear mandates. Q3: What does “preempting state laws” mean in this context? It means the proposed federal law would override existing and future state laws regulating AI development. States would retain authority only in limited areas like general fraud statutes or their own government’s AI use. Q4: Who supports this AI framework? The framework is strongly supported by many in the tech industry and startup ecosystem who seek regulatory clarity and fear restrictive state laws. Critics include consumer advocacy groups and some state officials who believe states are better at addressing emerging risks. Q5: What happens next with this AI policy proposal? The framework is a proposal to Congress. Lawmakers must now debate and potentially draft legislation based on its principles. The process will involve significant negotiation and could be shaped by the upcoming 2026 Bitcoin World Founder Summit and other industry gatherings. This post Trump’s AI Framework: A Bold Federal Power Grab That Preempts State Laws and Shifts Safety Burden first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

20 Mar 2026, 16:29

WLFI Price Drops as Treasury Unlocks 135M Tokens to Binance

On Friday, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) plunged by over 4% as the cryptocurrency market faces a correction, with BTC dropping below $70,000 once again In the last 24 hours, the WLFI has witnessed a liquidation of $564,944 worth of positions The constant drop in the cryptocurrency was seen after around 135 million tokens with a cumulative value of around $12.5 million were unlocked from the project treasury and deposited into Binance Trump family-linked DeFi project, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), plunged over 2.75% on Friday, following the downward momentum in the crypto market, with its correlation with the biggest cryptocurrency, Bitcoin. On March 20, WLFI dropped by 2.75% on a daily chart with a market capitalization of $2.52 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. The trading volume jumped by 31.78%, soaring to $106 million in the same time frame. At the time of writing, the total circulating supply of tokens revolves around 100 billion WLFI, according to CoinMarketCap . WLFI Faces Constant Selling Pressure After Treasury Unlocked 135 Million Tokens According to Coinglass , in the last 24 hours, the WLFI has witnessed a liquidation of $564,944 worth of positions. This includes the long position of $518,828 and $46,115 in the short position. Apart from the recent downward momentum in the crypto market, one of the major reasons behind the drop comes from a large treasury unlock and transfer of WLFI tokens. Approximately 135 million WLFI tokens worth around $12.5 million were unlocked from the project treasury and deposited to Binance. This development was reported through on-chain tracking , and it has introduced fresh sell-side pressure because markets see it as increased supply hitting the exchange. This development has created downward momentum as traders react to the possibility of more tokens being sold in the open market when there are positive developments like the AgentPay SDK launch for AI payments. In addition to this large transfer, ongoing distributions from team-linked wallets have persisted, adding to the supply accumulated earlier in the year. This pattern has damaged some investors’ confidence. These factors, including token unlocks, exchange deposits, and sustained distributions, have outperformed recent major developments on the project, which led to the current weakness in the token price. In the last 7 days, WLFI dropped by over 13%. On the Binance WLFI/USDT chart, which is the main trading pair for this token, the technical indicator highlights a bearish pattern that gives details of the recent price drop. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the 14-day average is revolving around 31.37 to 35.43, which revolves near oversold territory but fails to generate a clear reversal signal. This shows that persistent downward momentum continues without immediate signs of exhaustion. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator is sitting at standard 12 and 26 periods, which remain deeply negative at -0.0044 to -0.0047 with a continued sell crossover confirming accelerating bearish divergence. Short-term moving averages are mentioning the downward pressure with the 10-period exponential moving average at $0.0987 to $0.0993, trading well above the current price. According to the chart, the price movement in the cryptocurrency is showing a clear breakdown below major support around $0.095 with no higher lows forming on the 4-hour or daily timeframe. The Stochastic indicator with a percentage K reading of approximately 11 to 12 further validates slowing momentum. Also Read: Mantle Price Eyes $0.80 as Total Market Size on Aave Exceeds $1.34B

20 Mar 2026, 16:26

Strategy initiated with Buy rating at Texas Capital

More on Strategy Strategy: Bitcoin Cost Passes Milestone My Ultimate Contrarian Bet For 2026: Strategy Strategy: Don't Buy The Perilous Dip, Still Grossly Overvalued Michael Saylor’s Strategy buys nearly $1.6B worth of Bitcoin last week Strive adds $50M of Strategy’s STRC preferred stock to corporate treasury

20 Mar 2026, 16:25

Market analyst sees further Bitcoin downside, flags $60K as key level

In the latest Cointelegraph interview, professional trader Alessio Rastani warns that Bitcoin could fall below $60,000 before a meaningful bottom forms.

20 Mar 2026, 16:15

Federal Reserve’s Crucial Stance: Waller Confirms No Need for Rate Hikes in 2025

BitcoinWorld Federal Reserve’s Crucial Stance: Waller Confirms No Need for Rate Hikes in 2025 Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller delivered significant remarks today, clearly stating the central bank sees no immediate need to consider interest rate increases. This announcement provides crucial insight into the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy direction as economic indicators continue to evolve throughout 2025. Waller’s comments come at a pivotal moment for global financial markets, which have been closely monitoring central bank communications for signals about future policy adjustments. Federal Reserve Maintains Steady Course on Interest Rates Governor Christopher Waller’s recent statements reinforce the Federal Reserve’s current policy stance. During his address at the Economic Club of New York, Waller emphasized that current economic conditions do not warrant consideration of rate hikes. Consequently, this position aligns with recent Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes. The central bank continues prioritizing its dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability. Market analysts immediately reacted to Waller’s comments. Specifically, Treasury yields showed modest movement while equity markets demonstrated stability. Furthermore, the U.S. dollar index maintained its position against major global currencies. These market responses indicate investor confidence in the Federal Reserve’s communicated path. Economic Context Behind the Policy Decision Several key economic factors support the Federal Reserve’s current position. First, inflation metrics have shown consistent moderation throughout early 2025. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) recently registered at 2.3% year-over-year, approaching the Fed’s 2% target. Second, employment figures remain robust but sustainable, with unemployment holding steady at 3.8%. The following table illustrates recent economic indicators: Indicator Current Value Trend CPI Inflation 2.3% Declining Core PCE Inflation 2.1% Stable Unemployment Rate 3.8% Steady GDP Growth (Q1 2025) 2.1% Moderate Third, consumer spending patterns demonstrate resilience without excessive pressure on prices. Fourth, business investment continues at measured levels. Finally, global economic conditions provide a relatively stable backdrop for U.S. monetary policy decisions. Historical Perspective on Federal Reserve Policy Shifts The Federal Reserve’s current approach represents a significant evolution from previous years. During the 2022-2024 period, the central bank implemented the most aggressive tightening cycle in decades. The federal funds rate increased from near zero to a range of 5.25%-5.50%. This historical context makes Waller’s current statements particularly noteworthy. Several previous policy cycles offer valuable comparisons. The 2015-2018 tightening cycle proceeded more gradually than recent actions. The 2004-2006 period featured steady increases but different economic fundamentals. Understanding these historical patterns helps analysts interpret current Fed communications more accurately. Expert Analysis of Monetary Policy Trajectory Financial economists widely interpret Waller’s remarks as signaling an extended pause in rate adjustments. According to Dr. Sarah Chen, Chief Economist at Global Financial Insights, “Governor Waller’s comments reflect careful data analysis. The Federal Reserve appears confident that current policy settings appropriately balance growth and inflation concerns.” Market strategists emphasize several implications. First, borrowing costs should remain stable for consumers and businesses. Second, financial conditions will likely maintain current supportive levels. Third, the yield curve may continue its recent normalization pattern. Fourth, risk assets could benefit from reduced uncertainty about near-term rate movements. Global Central Bank Coordination and Implications The Federal Reserve’s stance occurs alongside similar positions from other major central banks. The European Central Bank recently maintained its policy rates while signaling cautious optimism about inflation trends. The Bank of England has similarly paused its tightening cycle. The Bank of Japan continues its distinctive approach amid different economic conditions. This global coordination carries several important implications: Currency stability among major economies Reduced volatility in international capital flows Consistent messaging supporting global economic stability Coordinated approach to monitoring inflation risks International financial institutions have welcomed this coordinated approach. The International Monetary Fund recently noted that synchronized central bank communication reduces global financial stability risks. Forward Guidance and Market Expectations Governor Waller’s comments provide valuable forward guidance to financial markets. Market participants now anticipate several probable scenarios. First, the Federal Reserve will likely maintain current rates through at least the third quarter of 2025. Second, any future policy adjustments will remain data-dependent. Third, the balance sheet reduction program will continue according to established plans. Futures markets currently price in minimal probability of rate increases before September 2025. However, they indicate approximately 35% probability of one rate cut by year-end. This pricing reflects market expectations that inflation will continue moderating toward the Fed’s target. Conclusion Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller’s clear statement regarding interest rates provides crucial policy transparency. The central bank sees no immediate need for rate hikes based on current economic conditions. This Federal Reserve position supports financial stability while allowing continued economic expansion. Market participants should monitor upcoming economic data releases for confirmation of these trends. The Federal Reserve’s data-dependent approach remains the guiding principle for all future monetary policy decisions. FAQs Q1: What specifically did Federal Reserve Governor Waller say about rate hikes? Governor Waller stated clearly that he does not believe current economic conditions warrant consideration of interest rate increases, emphasizing data shows inflation progressing toward the Fed’s 2% target. Q2: How does this affect mortgage rates and consumer borrowing costs? The Federal Reserve’s position suggests stability in borrowing costs, with mortgage rates likely to remain near current levels absent significant economic changes, providing predictability for homebuyers and businesses. Q3: What economic indicators is the Federal Reserve monitoring most closely? The Fed primarily tracks core PCE inflation, employment data, wage growth, consumer spending patterns, and business investment metrics to inform its policy decisions. Q4: How does this compare to other recent Federal Reserve communications? Waller’s comments align with recent FOMC statements and Chair Powell’s press conferences, all emphasizing a patient, data-dependent approach to monetary policy adjustments. Q5: What would cause the Federal Reserve to reconsider its position on rate hikes? Significant acceleration in inflation metrics, sustained overheating in labor markets, or evidence of rising inflation expectations could prompt reconsideration of current policy stance. This post Federal Reserve’s Crucial Stance: Waller Confirms No Need for Rate Hikes in 2025 first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

20 Mar 2026, 16:13

Morgan Stanley Files Second Amendment for Direct Spot Bitcoin ETF Product

Morgan Stanley has filed a second amended S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch its spot Bitcoin ETF. The update adds operational details and signals progress in the bank’s application, even though approval is still uncertain. Morgan Stanley Adds Structure to Bitcoin ETF Filing In its filing, the bank outlined plans for an initial seed basket of 50,000 shares, which is expected to raise about $1 million. Earlier in the month, the bank revealed that it had undertaken another routine step in ETF preparation, buying a couple of the fund’s shares for auditing purposes. In its previous amendment, the investment giant disclosed that it had roped in BNY Mellon and Coinbase as key service providers, with the former acting as its cash custodian, administrator, and transfer agent, while the latter will serve as prime broker and custodian for the fund’s BTC holdings. Additionally, the filing also confirmed that if approved, the proposed BTC ETF will trade on the NYSE Arca, with MSBT as its ticker. The financial institution submitted its BTC ETF application back in January, alongside filings for products linked to Solana (SOL). At the time, it stated that it had decided to embrace crypto assets due to improved regulatory clarity under the Trump administration. And while it is yet to disclose its management fees, the spot Bitcoin ETF could go live in the next few weeks, thanks to the SEC’s generic listing standard. Were that to happen, it would place Morgan Stanley among a growing list of issuers competing in the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market, where products launched in January 2024 have attracted over $56 billion in cumulative flows, according to data from SoSoValue. Institutional Crypto Push Gathers Pace Morgan Stanley’s foray into crypto isn’t exactly new. It previously allowed certain brokerage clients access to digital asset trading, and recent ETF launches from fellow Wall Street giant BlackRock could show them what to expect. BlackRock has been in the crypto ETF space for a while now, but it recently launched a staked Ethereum ETF that recorded a trading volume of more than $15 million on its first day. While the figure seemed modest, especially compared to the firm’s more established funds, it showed that there is still interest in new crypto investment structures. Meanwhile, Bitcoin itself was trading around the $70,000 level at the time of writing, up less than 1% in the last 24 hours and showing a dip of over 2% in the past seven days. In the last month, the OG cryptocurrency added at least 4% to its value, although it is still nearly 44% below its all-time high price recorded in October 2025, when it went past $126,000. The post Morgan Stanley Files Second Amendment for Direct Spot Bitcoin ETF Product appeared first on CryptoPotato .