hodler

13 Apr 2026, 11:00

Can Solana defend $80 after FTX/Alameda’s $16.2mln unstake?

Staking demand is still strong, with a large portion of supply locked, limiting aggressive sell pressure.

13 Apr 2026, 10:58

Nigel Farage buys $2.7 million worth of Bitcoin

Stack, a United Kingdom Bitcoin ( BTC ) treasury, announced on Monday, April 13, that Nigel Farage, a U.K. Member of Parliament (MP), has bought £2 million (~$2.7 million) worth of the flagship cryptocurrency. With the hefty purchase, Farage has become the first sitting MP and the first U.K. political party leader to publicly buy Bitcoin. “Stack cannot be a Bitcoin treasure unless we buy Bitcoin, which is exactly what we’ve done today. The company’s really starting to get moving, and what great partners we’ve got in Blockchain.com,” Farage said in a promotional video released on X. In the same announcement, Stack also hinted at more future purchases, stating that the latest acquisition is “only the beginning of a great journey.” BREAKING: Nigel Farage has purchased £2m of Bitcoin for Stack BTC – becoming the first sitting MP and the first UK political party leader in history to publicly buy Bitcoin. A landmark moment for Bitcoin in British politics. $STAK @Nigel_Farage @blockchain @kwasi_stackbtc … pic.twitter.com/O614kKe5TN — Stack BTC (@stackbtc_) April 13, 2026 Nigel Farage-backed Stack BTC now holds nearly $5 million in Bitcoin In another social media post published on the same day, Stack reported that it now holds 68 BTC. At the price of around $70,750 at the time of writing, Stack’s total Bitcoin holdings sit at approximately $4.81 million. Farage, a vocal Bitcoin supporter, invested in Stack in early March, participating in a £260,000 ($346,814) equity raise alongside Blockchain.com, giving him a 6% stake in the business. The firm is part of a growing wave of so-called digital asset treasury companies (DATs), publicly traded entities that accumulate cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets in order to benefit from rising prices. This model gained a lot of traction in the mainstream in the United States last year, supported in many ways by the pro-crypto stance of President Donald Trump. Farage, one of Trump’s allies, stated that his investment reflected a broader ambition to position London as a leading global crypto hub. Featured image via Shutterstock The post Nigel Farage buys $2.7 million worth of Bitcoin appeared first on Finbold .

13 Apr 2026, 10:58

Circle CEO: Unlikely for USDC to be used for Iran Strait transit, defends freeze policy after $285M hack

💥 Circle CEO: USDC is “highly unlikely” to be used for Iran’s Strait of Hormuz tolls due to strict compliance and freezing risks. Jeremy Allaire stressed Circle cooperates closely with authorities and sanctioned parties usually avoid USDC for high-risk transfers. 🛡️ After the $285M Drift Protocol hack, Circle defended not freezing funds immediately, citing legal constraints and moral concerns. Continue Reading: Circle CEO: Unlikely for USDC to be used for Iran Strait transit, defends freeze policy after $285M hack The post Circle CEO: Unlikely for USDC to be used for Iran Strait transit, defends freeze policy after $285M hack appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

13 Apr 2026, 10:58

Dogecoin Spot Flows Shift -252.97% to Start Week: Key Price Levels to Watch

Dogecoin begins crucial week with spot flows drop, traders now watch key price levels.

13 Apr 2026, 10:54

Hacker mints 1B fake DOT in Hyperbridge exploit: what it means

A major security incident has shaken confidence around Polkadot’s cross-chain ecosystem after attackers managed to exploit a vulnerability in the Hyperbridge system on Ethereum. The exploit, which has been acknowledged by the Polkadot team , allowed the creation of 1 billion fake DOT tokens, triggering panic across the market and dragging Polkadot’s price lower in the short term. How the Hyperbridge exploit unfolded The attack targeted a cross-chain bridge system that connects Polkadot-based assets to Ethereum. In simple terms, these bridges are meant to lock tokens on one chain and mint equivalent “wrapped” versions on another chain so they can be used across different ecosystems. In this case, the attacker found a weakness in the message verification process. By forging a valid-looking cross-chain message, they were able to trick the system into believing a legitimate request had been made. This gave them unauthorized administrative control over the Ethereum-side contract responsible for issuing bridged DOT. Once inside, the attacker minted roughly 1 billion unbacked DOT tokens on Ethereum in a single sequence of transactions. These tokens did not represent real assets on the Polkadot network, but they were still treated as valid within Ethereum-based liquidity pools. The attacker quickly sold the newly created tokens on decentralised exchanges. However, the liquidity in those markets was extremely thin, which meant the price collapsed almost immediately as selling pressure overwhelmed buyers. Despite the enormous nominal value of the minted tokens, the attacker only managed to extract around $237,000 before the market became unusable for further profit-taking. Polkadot’s DOT price reacted sharply to the hack Polkadot’s native token dropped around 6% following the news, with price hovering near the $1.17 region at press time. Notably, the move was not driven by any change in the underlying supply or protocol mechanics, but rather by fear and uncertainty spreading through the market. Traders reacted quickly to the idea that “1 billion DOT tokens” had been minted, even though the event only affected a bridged representation of the asset on Ethereum. The distinction between native DOT and wrapped tokens was largely ignored in the immediate reaction, which amplified selling pressure. At the same time, the broader cryptocurrency market was already showing mild weakness, which added further downside pressure. Bitcoin’s slight decline during the same period reduced overall risk appetite, making altcoins more vulnerable to sharper moves. As a result, DOT underperformed compared to the wider market, not because of a fundamental failure in its core blockchain, but due to a combination of panic sentiment and technical breakdowns on the charts. Polkadot price outlook From a technical perspective, Polkadot’s price structure was already leaning bearish before the exploit occurred. The token had been trending downward for an extended period, and the recent price drop only shows repeated failures to build strong upward momentum. The drop has pushed DOT below a key support area around the $1.17 level, briefly testing lower levels near $1.16. This zone now becomes important for traders watching short-term stability. If buyers manage to defend the $1.15 area, the market could enter a consolidation phase, where price stabilises and attempts a recovery bounce. In that scenario, the $1.19 to $1.20 range becomes the first meaningful resistance zone to watch, as it aligns with recent intraday pivot levels. However, if selling pressure continues and the $1.15 support fails, the structure suggests there may be room for further downside, especially seeing that momentum indicators like RSI show the altcoin is almost oversold. Polkadot (DOT) price analysis | Source: Tradingview In that case, the market could extend its broader downtrend, especially if sentiment around bridge security remains weak or if no clear resolution is communicated by developers. The post Hacker mints 1B fake DOT in Hyperbridge exploit: what it means appeared first on Invezz

13 Apr 2026, 10:54

Hyperbridge hack rocks Polkadot after 1B Fake DOT tokens minted

A major security incident has shaken confidence around Polkadot’s cross-chain ecosystem after attackers managed to exploit a vulnerability in the Hyperbridge system on Ethereum. The exploit, which has been acknowledged by the Polkadot team , allowed the creation of 1 billion fake DOT tokens, triggering panic across the market and dragging Polkadot’s price lower in the short term. How the Hyperbridge exploit unfolded The attack targeted a cross-chain bridge system that connects Polkadot-based assets to Ethereum. In simple terms, these bridges are meant to lock tokens on one chain and mint equivalent “wrapped” versions on another chain so they can be used across different ecosystems. In this case, the attacker found a weakness in the message verification process. By forging a valid-looking cross-chain message, they were able to trick the system into believing a legitimate request had been made. This gave them unauthorized administrative control over the Ethereum-side contract responsible for issuing bridged DOT. Once inside, the attacker minted roughly 1 billion unbacked DOT tokens on Ethereum in a single sequence of transactions. These tokens did not represent real assets on the Polkadot network, but they were still treated as valid within Ethereum-based liquidity pools. The attacker quickly sold the newly created tokens on decentralised exchanges. However, the liquidity in those markets was extremely thin, which meant the price collapsed almost immediately as selling pressure overwhelmed buyers. Despite the enormous nominal value of the minted tokens, the attacker only managed to extract around $237,000 before the market became unusable for further profit-taking. Polkadot’s DOT price reacted sharply to the hack Polkadot’s native token dropped around 6% following the news, with price hovering near the $1.17 region at press time. Notably, the move was not driven by any change in the underlying supply or protocol mechanics, but rather by fear and uncertainty spreading through the market. Traders reacted quickly to the idea that “1 billion DOT tokens” had been minted, even though the event only affected a bridged representation of the asset on Ethereum. The distinction between native DOT and wrapped tokens was largely ignored in the immediate reaction, which amplified selling pressure. At the same time, the broader cryptocurrency market was already showing mild weakness, which added further downside pressure. Bitcoin’s slight decline during the same period reduced overall risk appetite, making altcoins more vulnerable to sharper moves. As a result, DOT underperformed compared to the wider market, not because of a fundamental failure in its core blockchain, but due to a combination of panic sentiment and technical breakdowns on the charts. Polkadot price outlook From a technical perspective, Polkadot’s price structure was already leaning bearish before the exploit occurred. The token had been trending downward for an extended period, and the recent price drop only shows repeated failures to build strong upward momentum. The drop has pushed DOT below a key support area around the $1.17 level, briefly testing lower levels near $1.16. This zone now becomes important for traders watching short-term stability. If buyers manage to defend the $1.15 area, the market could enter a consolidation phase, where price stabilises and attempts a recovery bounce. In that scenario, the $1.19 to $1.20 range becomes the first meaningful resistance zone to watch, as it aligns with recent intraday pivot levels. However, if selling pressure continues and the $1.15 support fails, the structure suggests there may be room for further downside, especially seeing that momentum indicators like RSI show the altcoin is almost oversold. Polkadot (DOT) price analysis | Source: Tradingview In that case, the market could extend its broader downtrend, especially if sentiment around bridge security remains weak or if no clear resolution is communicated by developers. The post Hyperbridge hack rocks Polkadot after 1B Fake DOT tokens minted appeared first on Invezz