News
31 May 2026, 19:31
Cardano Summit Canceled After Treasury Funding Fails

The Cardano Foundation has canceled its flagship 2026 summit in Singapore after a revised 7.8 million ADA treasury funding proposal failed to clear the network's decentralized governance hurdle.
31 May 2026, 19:30
Axie Infinity (AXS) Price Prediction 2026-2030: Technical Analysis and Key Market Drivers

BitcoinWorld Axie Infinity (AXS) Price Prediction 2026-2030: Technical Analysis and Key Market Drivers Axie Infinity (AXS) remains one of the most recognized names in the blockchain gaming sector, having pioneered the play-to-earn model during the 2021 bull run. As the market evolves, investors and gamers alike are looking ahead to understand where AXS prices could head between 2026 and 2030. This analysis examines technical indicators, market trends, and fundamental factors that could shape the token’s trajectory. Current Market Position and Technical Overview Axie Infinity’s native token, AXS, serves as both a governance and utility token within the Axie ecosystem. After reaching an all-time high of $164.90 in November 2021, AXS experienced a significant correction, mirroring the broader crypto market downturn. As of early 2025, AXS trades in a range that reflects both the maturation of the gaming sector and ongoing development within the Ronin network. Key technical levels to watch include support around the $5-$6 zone, which has historically acted as a accumulation area. Resistance levels near $12-$15 represent critical breakout points. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has shown signs of recovery from oversold conditions, while moving average convergence divergence (MACD) indicators suggest potential bullish crossovers in the medium term. Fundamental Drivers for 2026-2030 Several factors will influence AXS price action in the coming years. The expansion of the Ronin ecosystem, including new game releases and DeFi integrations, could drive demand for AXS. Additionally, the broader adoption of blockchain gaming, particularly in emerging markets, may expand the user base. Tokenomics also play a role. AXS has a capped supply of 270 million tokens, with a vesting schedule that gradually reduces inflation. Staking mechanisms, which lock tokens and reduce circulating supply, could provide price support during periods of high network activity. Market Sentiment and Institutional Interest Institutional involvement in blockchain gaming has increased, with venture capital firms and gaming studios exploring Web3 integrations. Axie Infinity’s established brand and large player base position it to benefit from this trend. However, regulatory developments around gaming tokens and in-game assets remain a risk factor that could impact price trajectories. Technical Analysis and Price Targets Based on historical price patterns and Fibonacci retracement levels, analysts have outlined potential scenarios for AXS: Bullish scenario: If the broader crypto market enters a new cycle and gaming adoption accelerates, AXS could retest previous highs in the $80-$120 range by 2028-2030, driven by ecosystem growth and increased token utility. Base case scenario: Gradual growth to $20-$40 by 2027, supported by steady development and user acquisition, with periodic corrections tied to market cycles. Bearish scenario: If competition from other gaming chains intensifies or regulatory hurdles emerge, AXS may trade in the $3-$8 range, reflecting a more conservative valuation. It is important to note that cryptocurrency price predictions are inherently speculative and subject to high volatility. Technical analysis provides a framework but cannot guarantee future performance. Why This Matters to Investors For those tracking the blockchain gaming sector, AXS serves as a bellwether for the industry’s health. Price movements in AXS often correlate with broader sentiment toward play-to-earn models and Web3 gaming. Understanding the technical and fundamental landscape can help investors make informed decisions, though caution is warranted given the asset class’s volatility. Conclusion Axie Infinity’s AXS token faces a mixed outlook through 2030, with significant upside potential if the blockchain gaming sector matures as expected, balanced by risks from competition and regulation. Technical indicators suggest accumulation phases may present opportunities, but long-term price targets remain highly uncertain. Investors should focus on ecosystem developments and market trends rather than short-term price movements. FAQs Q1: Is Axie Infinity a good long-term investment? Axie Infinity has a strong brand and active development team, but like all cryptocurrencies, it carries high risk. Long-term potential depends on ecosystem adoption and market conditions. Diversification and thorough research are recommended. Q2: What is the maximum supply of AXS? The maximum supply of AXS is capped at 270 million tokens. As of early 2025, a significant portion has been unlocked, with remaining tokens subject to a vesting schedule that reduces inflation over time. Q3: How does staking affect AXS price? Staking reduces the circulating supply of AXS, which can create upward price pressure if demand remains steady. However, staking rewards also introduce selling pressure when tokens are unstaked and sold. The net effect depends on overall market sentiment. This post Axie Infinity (AXS) Price Prediction 2026-2030: Technical Analysis and Key Market Drivers first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
31 May 2026, 19:30
‘Now Or Never’ For Crypto Clarity, CEO Warns Ahead Of Key June Push

Four working weeks. That’s all the time left in June for the US Senate to move on the CLARITY Act before lawmakers head into recess — and the crypto industry is watching the clock. A Crowded Legislative Calendar Senate Majority Leader John Thune confirmed that the chamber’s reconciliation package would not be completed this month, forcing senators to return in June with a packed agenda. The CLARITY Act, a market structure bill that cleared the Senate Banking Committee with a 15-9 bipartisan vote, now has to compete for floor time against reconciliation talks, FISA matters, and a housing package already passed by the House. Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz put the situation plainly. “June is ‘Clarity’ month,” he wrote on X. “It’s literally now or never.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also pushed both the Senate and House to move on the bill. His call to action was followed by a jump in approval odds on prediction market Polymarket, which placed the bill’s chances of becoming law in 2026 at around 60% as of the latest reports. June is “Clarity” month. It’s literally now or never. — Mike Novogratz (@novogratz) May 30, 2026 The Stakes Behind The Deadline Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, one of the bill’s strongest backers, has been direct about what happens if Congress misses this window. Reports indicate she told lawmakers that the next realistic opening for crypto asset legislation is likely 2030. Until then, she said, developers have no legal protections and law enforcement lacks the tools to go after bad actors. Lummis also framed the stakes in geopolitical terms. “If the United States doesn’t establish the global standard for digital asset regulation, someone else will,” she wrote. “China is not waiting.” She has tied the bill to US President Donald Trump’s broader posture on crypto , urging colleagues to deliver it to his desk. Trump has publicly expressed support for policies that favor the digital asset industry. Why Time Is Running Out Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett noted that with only three working weeks in July before the August recess, the June window is effectively the last clear runway. The bill, she wrote, is now competing directly for floor time. “Clarity Act passage before August recess just got more challenging ,” she said. Lummis echoed the warning, saying delays could push the issue off the table for years. The bill, she argued, would solve two problems at once — giving developers legal certainty and giving regulators clear authority over the market. Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
31 May 2026, 19:23
Stellar achieves multi-year trend breakout with 113 percent returns! What do investors need to watch now?

🚀 Stellar Lumens smashed its multi-year downtrend and delivered a 113 percent return in days. Technical momentum is building fast as $XLM holds above key support levels. 📉 Volatility is high and traders are tracking the next move after this explosive rally. Continue Reading: Stellar achieves multi-year trend breakout with 113 percent returns! What do investors need to watch now? The post Stellar achieves multi-year trend breakout with 113 percent returns! What do investors need to watch now? appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
31 May 2026, 19:10
The ‘AI Psychosis’ Debate: Are Tech CEOs Too Far Removed From the Work?

BitcoinWorld The ‘AI Psychosis’ Debate: Are Tech CEOs Too Far Removed From the Work? A growing debate over what Box founder Aaron Levie has termed “AI psychosis” among tech CEOs has reignited questions about how closely corporate leaders understand the tools they are aggressively deploying. The discussion, which played out on a recent episode of Bitcoin World’s Equity podcast, highlights a widening gap between executive enthusiasm for artificial intelligence and the skepticism felt by many users and workers. What is ‘AI Psychosis’? Levie’s phrase, shared on social media, describes a condition where CEOs become “uniquely prone” to overestimating AI’s immediate impact because they are “sufficiently distant from the last mile of work that still has to happen to generate most value with AI.” In essence, leaders who are not directly using the tools day-to-day may be making strategic decisions based on abstract promises rather than practical realities. Levie is not anti-AI; he argues that executives must actually use the technology to understand its limitations and real-world applications. Signs of a Broader Backlash The debate arrives amid tangible signs of consumer and workforce pushback. DuckDuckGo, the privacy-focused search engine, reported a 30% surge in installs following Google’s announcement that it is integrating more AI features into its core search experience. This suggests a significant audience is actively seeking alternatives to what they perceive as being “force-fed” AI. Other indicators include graduating college students booing mentions of AI at ceremonies, a growing unease around tech industry layoffs tied to automation, and a general sense that the technology is being pushed faster than many users are comfortable with. Kirsten Korosec, a senior reporter at Bitcoin World, noted on the podcast that Google faces a dilemma: “It’s chasing that thing it feels like it has to do to keep up, but it’s messing with the thing that people attach to the brand the most, and it’s not improving it.” Google’s Search Identity Crisis Google’s struggle to balance AI innovation with its core identity as an information retrieval system was a central theme. Sean O’Kane, another reporter on the podcast, observed that Google’s messaging at its I/O developer conference focused heavily on commercial transactions like booking flights and shopping, rather than improving the core search experience users have relied on for decades. “They go off and sort of shoot themselves in the foot by releasing this stuff and running into the same problems they’ve run into for years,” O’Kane said, referencing incidents where Google’s AI systems made basic errors, such as misspelling the company’s own name. An Opportunity for Startups? Korosec raised a key question: could the anti-AI sentiment create openings for new businesses? Anthony Ha, Bitcoin World’s weekend editor, pointed out that a year ago, even alternative search engines were experimenting with AI features. Now, some are pivoting to an explicitly anti-AI stance, positioning themselves as safe havens for users who want a traditional, unadulterated search experience. This shift suggests a market niche for companies that prioritize user trust over AI hype. The Workforce Impact The discussion also touched on how AI is reshaping the workforce. While many executives and venture capitalists embrace the vision of smaller, more efficient teams, workers are feeling the effects through layoffs and changing job roles. Ha noted that previous technological transformations were often bottom-up, driven by workers adopting tools they found useful. In contrast, the current AI push appears more top-down, driven by executive and investor pressure to achieve productivity gains that may not yet be fully realized. Conclusion The “AI psychosis” debate underscores a critical moment for the tech industry. As CEOs continue to bet heavily on AI, the gap between their vision and the reality of implementation, user sentiment, and workforce impact is becoming increasingly visible. Whether this leads to a more measured approach or a further acceleration of the trend will depend on how many leaders heed Levie’s advice to get closer to the actual work. FAQs Q1: What does ‘AI psychosis’ mean in this context? It refers to a tendency among tech CEOs to overestimate AI’s immediate value because they are not directly involved in the hands-on work required to implement and use the tools effectively. The term was coined by Box founder Aaron Levie. Q2: Why are users moving to DuckDuckGo? DuckDuckGo reported a 30% increase in installs after Google announced deeper AI integration into its search engine. Many users are seeking a search experience without AI-generated summaries or features, valuing privacy and traditional results. Q3: Is the anti-AI sentiment likely to slow down AI adoption in business? It may create pressure for more thoughtful implementation. While the backlash is real, especially among consumers and some workers, corporate investment in AI continues to grow. The key question is whether companies will balance innovation with user trust and practical deployment. This post The ‘AI Psychosis’ Debate: Are Tech CEOs Too Far Removed From the Work? first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
31 May 2026, 19:02
Expert Says If You Sold XRP For XLM, Crypto Is Not Your Future, XRP Army Reacts

Some investors moved swiftly after the DTCC announcement. They started selling their XRP after XLM began a huge rally. Crypto pundit X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) watched it happen and responded with a sharp observation. “If you just traded your XRP for XLM, crypto is not your future.” On May 27, the DTCC and the Stellar Development Foundation announced plans to integrate DTCC’s tokenized securities platform with the Stellar network by the first half of 2027. The partnership covers Russell 1000 stocks, ETFs, and U.S. Treasuries. XLM surged over 14% once the news broke, and reports suggest that some investors treated that price movement as a signal to exit XRP entirely. If you just traded your XRP for XLM, crypto is not your future… — X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) May 29, 2026 The Payment Rail Thesis The replies came quickly, and X Finance Bull engaged with many of them. When one user suggested simply trading XRP for Litecoin, he acknowledged Litecoin’s history, stating his focus stays on “rails with institutional settlement and cross-border utility .” When another user said holding both assets was the move, he agreed, calling it “simple and probably smart.” This explains that XRP serves deeper liquidity while XLM captures the network effect. Responding to a user who saw no need to choose between the two, he stated , “XRP and XLM are different lanes of the same payments thesis. No need to overthink that.” He also described XRP as “the deeper settlement bet,” telling one commenter that timing a single price pump does not equate to understanding the cycle. The DTCC itself pursues a multi-chain strategy. Stellar is not its exclusive blockchain partner. That detail alone challenges the logic of abandoning one payment rail asset for another. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 XRP Army Reacts The community’s response reflected broad agreement with X Finance Bull’s position. Several investors stated they hold both assets with no intention of choosing between them. X Finance Bull also noted that both assets operate in the payments lane with different angles, making exposure to both a straightforward decision. Some responses addressed the idea of rotating profits. X Finance Bull acknowledged that taking profit is reasonable, but argued that abandoning the larger thesis entirely is a mistake. One commenter stated that XLM was the superior asset, but X Finance Bull pointed out that XRP remains the deeper liquidity bet once serious settlement volume arrives. Conviction Over Rotation Other experts have criticized investors for selling XRP to buy XLM because of a headline and a slight increase. X Finance Bull suggests that investors who understand the payment rail thesis hold both assets. Those who rotate based on one announcement reveal they never fully committed to the thesis in the first place. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Expert Says If You Sold XRP For XLM, Crypto Is Not Your Future, XRP Army Reacts appeared first on Times Tabloid .






































