hodler

18 Mar 2026, 10:42

Ethereum targets 13-second deposit times with new fast confirmation rule

Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin has revealed that the network is preparing to slash deposit times to about 13 seconds, down from minutes. The update, known as the Fast Confirmation Rule (FCR), is now being implemented by consensus layer client teams and does not require a hard fork. Currently, when transferring assets from Ethereum to Layer 2 networks or centralized exchanges, users have to wait for several minutes for confirmations. During that time, funds are locked, which leads to trading and bridge friction. According to a blog post by an Ethereum developer, “FCR is set to be the new industry standard for L2s and exchanges.” Once deployed, deposit times are expected to reduce from a range of 2 to 13 minutes to about 1 slot, or about 13 seconds. This translates into an estimated reduction of 80% to 98%, depending on the destination and use case. Exchanges and layer 2 network s ga in faster transaction flow The update is expected to transform the way multiple participants interact with Ethereum. Centralized exchanges stand to benefit immediately, as they can credit user deposits after a single slot instead of waiting for multiple confirmations. At the same time, Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Base will experience faster deposit processing. Reduced delays mean less capital is tied up in bridging contracts, which, in turn, supports liquidity flows across scaling solutions. In addition, tighter risk controls and lower operational costs are available to cross-chain solvers and bridge operators. Buterin further noted, “So one step below economic finality, but very strong for many use cases.” Attestation mode l to strengthen confirmation logic FCR replaces traditional methods of verifying depth of knowledge with an attestation-driven system. Previously, transactions were deemed safe once they reached a certain number of blocks, which was often called the “k-deep” method. Additionally, the update is incorporated into the existing infrastructure of Ethereum. The system reuses the “safe” block tag in the context of the JSON-RPC, making it possible for RPC providers and exchanges to implement the improvement without making any significant technical changes. The Fast Confirmation Rule is expected to be rolled out in the next few months. The developers are also liaising with exchanges, Layer 2 platforms, and infrastructure providers to facilitate an easy transition. Notably, Buterin recently laid out a multi-year roadmap with several protocol upgrades to enhance speed, scalability, and security. Among the proposed changes is a step-by-step reduction in slot times from 12 seconds to a long-term goal of 2 seconds. That roadmap also includes improvements like native privacy features and post-quantum cryptographic protections. In addition, Buterin emphasized that Ethereum’s design aims to have the best of both worlds. This news comes as Ethereum (ETH) has recovered to the $2,300 level for the first time since early February, gaining more than 12% in the past week. Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank .

11 Mar 2026, 19:04

Pump.fun enables cross-chain deposits through Moonpay to expand meme token liquidity

Pump.fun will accept tokens from other chains, adding extra liquidity to accounts in the trenches. The new deposits will be made through a partnership with Moonpay. Pump.fun traders will be able to fund their wallets with tokens from nine different chains. Deposits will be available through Moonpay, which has partnered with the meme token launchpad since November 2025. Moonpay will handle payments from Bitcoin and ETH, as well as L2 chains Base, Arbitrum, and Polygon. Deposits will be available from Hyperliquid, BNB Chain, and other networks. BREAKING: @Pumpfun traders can easily fund their account with tokens from 9 chains via @MoonPay : 🔵 Arbitrum 🟦 Base 🟠 Bitcoin 🟡 BSC 🔷 Ethereum 🟩 Hyperliquid 🟢 Plasma 🟪 Polygon 🟣 Solana Tap "Deposit" then “Cross Chain Deposit” in the @Pumpfun app to try it! pic.twitter.com/BCnNyzMKds — MoonPay 🟣 (@moonpay) March 11, 2026 With this move, Pump.fun grabs liquidity from other meme ecosystems, allowing holders to move seamlessly into Solana without trading or acquiring SOL. Until the addition of more crypto chains, Moonpay supported deposit methods like cards, bank transfers, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and other fiat fintech apps. Pump.fun expects to expand meme activity Pump.fun may expand its activity, while meme trading on other chains slows down or disappears. With this move, Pump.fun will become an even stronger competition to Four.meme, by directly tapping BNB tokens. The cross-chain deposits will be embedded into the Pump.fun app. The platform can harness both highly valuable assets like BTC and niche or less active tokens from other networks. The move comes as the altcoin market is still near all-time lows, seeking ways to be used productively. Pump.fun has tried to boost both token creation and graduations by optimizing its fee structure and returning some of the fees to the community. More tokens are graduating from Pump.fun Pump.fun gradiations climbed to an eight-month peak again. A total of over 400 tokens are graduating daily, or over 1.29% of all new launches, breaking a recent local high of 1.15% of all launches. Pump.fun had a peak level of graduating tokens, 1.29% out of around 28,000 new daily tokens. | Source: Dune Analytics For the first time in months, Pump.fun has produced tokens with a larger market cap. WAR now stands at over $30M, though still failing to break previous runs to over $100M. Pump.fun produces between 28K and 30K new tokens daily, with a graduation rate of 280 and up to 400 on peak days. The new fee structure encourages more graduations to Pump.swap, instead of leaving tokens in their bonding curve without liquidity. Pump.fun carries over $192M in locked liquidity, with over $1B in annualized fees and around $472M in net earnings. The Pump.fun team has already bought over 28.6% of the PUMP supply, increasing the pace of purchases since the start of 2026. Despite this, PUMP stayed in its usual range of $0.0019. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

11 Mar 2026, 17:00

Solana Overtakes Ethereum In Trillion-Dollar Sector, Is There A New King In Town?

Solana has overtaken Ethereum in terms of total real-world asset (RWA) holders, providing a positive sign for the network. However, Ethereum remains ahead in total tokenized value on these networks. Solana Ranks Ahead Of Ethereum In RWA Holders In an X post , Solana pointed to data from RWA.xyz showing that the network had, for the first time, surpassed Ethereum in total RWA holders. SOL currently has 157,112 RWA holders while Ethereum has 153,592 holders. However, it is worth noting that the Plume network has the most RWA holders (263,132) among all networks despite boasting a lower total RWA value than Ethereum and Solana. However, the Plume network has seen an almost 3% drop in its RWA holders over the last 30 days, while Ethereum and SOL have seen an increase of 8% and 7%, respectively. Despite SOL surpassing Ethereum in total RWA holders, Ethereum still leads in terms of total RWA value with $15.4 billion on the network, excluding stablecoins. Meanwhile, the Solana network has a total RWA value of $1.8 billion, also behind networks such as the BNB chain and the XRP Ledger (XRPL) . Furthermore, Ethereum leads SOL in the number of tokenization projects on the network, with 675 and 345, respectively. The largest projects on Ethereum are Tether Gold, Paxos Gold, Syrup USDC, and BlackRock’s BUIDL funds. Meanwhile, the largest projects on Solana are BlackRock’s BUIDL fund , PRIME, Ondo tokenized funds, and OnRe tokenized Reinsurance. However, it is worth noting that Ethereum and SOL are still behind Arbitrum in the number of tokenized projects on their networks. Arbitrum currently has an RWA count of 1,763, although it is still behind Ethereum and SOL in total RWA value and holders. SOL Gaining Ground On Stablecoins Data shared by Visa showed that the Solana network gained ground over Ethereum in stablecoin transaction volume last month. SOL recorded a stablecoin transaction volume of $660.64 billion, while Ethereum saw a stablecoin transaction volume of $548.82 billion in February. Solana has achieved this feat despite being behind Ethereum in stablecoin asset count, with Ethereum at 86 and Solana at 33. Ethereum also has a larger stablecoin market cap of $$166.7 billion, while SOL has a stablecoin market cap of $15.8 billion. Ethereum also has more stablecoin holders (21.18 million) than Solana (9.7 million). Ethereum’s stablecoin market cap has grown over 4% in the last 30 days, but its stablecoin transfer volume has dropped 100% to 48,850. SOL, on the other hand, has seen its stablecoin holders climb over 9% in the last 30 days, and its transfer volume has surged 85% to $1.85 trillion.

10 Mar 2026, 14:55

Trust Wallet Deploys Vital Real-Time Scam Address Screening to Thwart $500M Crypto Threat

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet Deploys Vital Real-Time Scam Address Screening to Thwart $500M Crypto Threat Trust Wallet, a leading self-custody cryptocurrency wallet, has launched a vital new security feature designed to combat one of the fastest-growing threats in digital finance: address poisoning. This real-time scam address screening function aims to prevent users from inadvertently sending funds to fraudulent wallets, addressing a threat responsible for over $500 million in damages globally. The announcement, reported by Cointelegraph, marks a significant escalation in the ongoing battle for user protection within the decentralized ecosystem. Trust Wallet’s Real-Time Scam Address Screening Explained The newly deployed screening technology operates by analyzing transaction details in real-time before a user confirms a send operation. When a recipient address matches known patterns or is associated with previous poisoning attacks, the system triggers an immediate warning. This proactive defense mechanism is integrated directly into the wallet’s user interface, providing a critical safety net. Initially, the feature will provide coverage across 32 Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible blockchains. This comprehensive list includes major networks like Ethereum , BNB Smart Chain , Polygon , Optimism , Arbitrum , Avalanche , and Base . The broad chain support is crucial because attackers frequently exploit cross-chain interoperability. Address poisoning, also known as “address spoofing,” has evolved into a sophisticated phishing technique. The attack vector exploits a common user behavior: copying addresses from transaction history. An attacker first sends a minuscule, often negligible amount of cryptocurrency—sometimes just dust—from a fraudulent wallet to a victim’s address. Consequently, this malicious address appears in the victim’s transaction history. Later, when the user intends to send a legitimate transaction, they may accidentally copy the attacker’s address from their history instead of the correct one. The wallet then sends the full amount to the scammer’s controlled address, resulting in irreversible loss. The Escalating Threat of Address Poisoning Attacks Trust Wallet’s security team has identified address poisoning as a critical and expanding threat. To date, blockchain analysts have tracked over 225 million such attacks, leading to cumulative damages exceeding $500 million . This staggering figure likely represents only reported or detected incidents, with many more going unrecorded. The attacks target both novice and experienced users, as the scheme relies on human error rather than technical exploits. Furthermore, the rise of token airdrops and frequent DeFi interactions has increased the volume of transactions in user histories, creating more opportunities for malicious addresses to hide in plain sight. Industry-Wide Security Implications and Responses The introduction of real-time screening by a major wallet provider sets a new precedent for security standards. Other wallet services and blockchain analytics firms have been developing similar heuristic and database-driven solutions. For instance, some platforms maintain shared threat intelligence lists of known fraudulent addresses. However, Trust Wallet’s implementation is notable for its scale and real-time nature, acting as an integrated layer rather than a separate tool. This move reflects a broader industry shift from reactive security—relying on post-hoc analysis and blacklists—to proactive, preventative measures that intervene at the point of transaction. Security experts emphasize that while technological solutions are essential, user education remains paramount. The classic advice of “always double-check every character of a recipient address” is still valid. Additionally, using address book features, QR codes, or ENS (Ethereum Name Service) domains can significantly reduce risk. The new screening feature acts as a powerful secondary defense, catching mistakes that even vigilant users might make. This layered security approach—combining technology, design, and education—is becoming the gold standard for protecting digital assets. Technical Implementation and Future Roadmap The screening function leverages a combination of on-chain analytics and reported incident data to identify potentially poisoned addresses. The system checks for patterns such as address similarity (where a scam address is generated to look visually similar to a legitimate one), association with known phishing campaigns, and anomalous transaction histories. The real-time aspect is computationally challenging, requiring efficient data processing to avoid delaying user transactions. Trust Wallet has optimized this process to provide near-instantaneous warnings without impacting the user experience. Looking ahead, the wallet’s development team has indicated plans to expand the feature’s capabilities. Potential future enhancements could include machine learning models that predict new poisoning techniques, integration with decentralized identity solutions, and expanded support for non-EVM chains like Solana and Bitcoin. The ongoing arms race between security developers and attackers ensures that such features will require constant updates and refinement. The table below summarizes the core aspects of the threat and the new solution: Aspect Address Poisoning Threat Trust Wallet’s Screening Solution Primary Method Sending dust to pollute transaction history Real-time address validation before sending User Impact Irreversible loss of sent funds Visual warning and transaction interruption Initial Coverage All EVM and non-EVM chains 32 EVM-compatible blockchains at launch Industry Losses > $500 million identified Aims to reduce future losses significantly Prevention Type Relies on user vigilance Provides automated, integrated protection Conclusion Trust Wallet’s deployment of real-time scam address screening represents a vital and timely advancement in cryptocurrency security. By directly tackling the pervasive threat of address poisoning, the feature provides a necessary safety layer for millions of users. The integration across 32 major blockchains demonstrates a commitment to ecosystem-wide protection. As the digital asset space continues to grow, the importance of such proactive, user-centric security measures cannot be overstated. This development not only protects individual assets but also strengthens overall trust in the self-custody model, which is fundamental to the decentralized vision. The fight against crypto fraud requires constant innovation, and this new screening function is a significant step forward in securing the future of decentralized finance. FAQs Q1: What exactly is address poisoning in cryptocurrency? Address poisoning is a phishing technique where a scammer sends a tiny amount of crypto from a fraudulent wallet to a victim’s address. The scam address then appears in the victim’s transaction history. The attacker hopes the victim will later accidentally copy that scam address when making a real payment, sending funds directly to the attacker. Q2: How does Trust Wallet’s new screening feature work? The feature works in real-time as a user prepares to send cryptocurrency. It checks the recipient address against known threat databases and analyzes it for suspicious patterns. If the system identifies a high risk of address poisoning or other fraud, it displays a clear warning to the user, allowing them to cancel the transaction. Q3: Which blockchains are supported by this security feature? At launch, the screening covers 32 EVM-compatible networks. Major supported chains include Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum, Avalanche, and Base. Support for additional EVM and non-EVM chains is expected in future updates. Q4: Can this feature completely prevent me from losing funds to scams? While it is a powerful preventative tool, no single feature can guarantee complete safety. The screening is designed to catch address poisoning and known fraudulent addresses. Users must still practice fundamental security: double-checking addresses, using address books, and being wary of unsolicited requests. Q5: Does the real-time screening slow down my transactions? Trust Wallet has optimized the process to minimize latency. The security check happens almost instantaneously in the background, so it should not create a noticeable delay for users when confirming transactions. The goal is to provide protection without compromising user experience. This post Trust Wallet Deploys Vital Real-Time Scam Address Screening to Thwart $500M Crypto Threat first appeared on BitcoinWorld .