Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%

PRICE
+7.65%
$0.01138

PRICE
+7.57%
$0.00001001

PRICE
+6.15%
$0.2859

PRICE
+5.38%
$289.58

PRICE
+3.65%
$0.6796

PRICE
+3.06%
$0.7447

PRICE
+2.98%
$0.2086

PRICE
+2.84%
$0.09740

PRICE
+2.77%
$1.8

PRICE
+2.69%
$0.2438

PRICE
+2.36%
$41.42
PRICE
+2.14%
$0.03329

PRICE
+2.06%
$2.37

PRICE
+1.92%
$383.96

PRICE
+1.57%
$3.01

PRICE
+1.48%
$0.1114

PRICE
+1.43%
$3.26

PRICE
+1.37%
$0.3314

PRICE
+1.37%
$0.9373

PRICE
+1.35%
$1.23

PRICE
+1.32%
$0.001834

PRICE
+1.17%
$8.57

PRICE
+1.05%
$2,307.71

PRICE
+1.02%
$93

PRICE
+0.98%
$2,836.5

VOL24
+128.93%
$1.14

VOL24
+96.53%
$0.1484

VOL24
+40.01%
$0.2859

VOL24
+25.08%
$0.3314

VOL24
+19.27%
$0.1114
VOL24
+17.16%
$0.007548

VOL24
+10.57%
$0.05522

VOL24
+6.23%
$0.08484

VOL24
+5.96%
$8.35

VOL24
+3.69%
$2.37

VOL24
+2.52%
$384.61
VOL24
+1.74%
$1.97

VOL24
+0.42%
$9.17

VOL24
+0%
$11.07

VOL24
+0%
$1.23

VOL24
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+0%
$1.11

VOL24
+0%
$115.1
PRICE
+7.65%
$0.01138

PRICE
+7.57%
$0.00001001

PRICE
+6.15%
$0.2859

PRICE
+5.38%
$289.58

PRICE
+3.65%
$0.6796

PRICE
+3.06%
$0.7447

PRICE
+2.98%
$0.2086

PRICE
+2.84%
$0.09740

PRICE
+2.77%
$1.8

PRICE
+2.69%
$0.2438

PRICE
+2.36%
$41.42
PRICE
+2.14%
$0.03329

PRICE
+2.06%
$2.37

PRICE
+1.92%
$383.96

PRICE
+1.57%
$3.01

PRICE
+1.48%
$0.1114

PRICE
+1.43%
$3.26

PRICE
+1.37%
$0.3314

PRICE
+1.37%
$0.9373

PRICE
+1.35%
$1.23

PRICE
+1.32%
$0.001834

PRICE
+1.17%
$8.57

PRICE
+1.05%
$2,307.71

PRICE
+1.02%
$93

PRICE
+0.98%
$2,836.5

VOL24
+128.93%
$1.14

VOL24
+96.53%
$0.1484

VOL24
+40.01%
$0.2859

VOL24
+25.08%
$0.3314

VOL24
+19.27%
$0.1114
VOL24
+17.16%
$0.007548

VOL24
+10.57%
$0.05522

VOL24
+6.23%
$0.08484

VOL24
+5.96%
$8.35

VOL24
+3.69%
$2.37

VOL24
+2.52%
$384.61
VOL24
+1.74%
$1.97

VOL24
+0.42%
$9.17

VOL24
+0%
$11.07

VOL24
+0%
$1.23

VOL24
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+0%
$1.11

VOL24
+0%
$115.1
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$0.1340
#146
$285,458,802
$164,584,591
2,117,847,344
4,294,967,296

Rank #2
$2,293.31
+1.59%

Rank #7
$83.74
+1.06%

Rank #25
$9.16
+0.55%

Rank #45
$1.29
-0.41%

Rank #70
$1.92
+0.95%

Rank #88
$0.1257
+0.61%

Rank #113
$0.3675
+0.98%

Rank #484
$0.09012
+1.13%

Rank #572
$0.004882
-0.76%

Rank #30898
$0.5618
+19.94%

Rank #30944
$0.4006
+0.52%
1 May 2026, 02:56

OP market structure is in horizontal consolidation; $0.1227 resistance and $0.1189 support are critical as BOS levels. Bearish bias is dominant, be careful with BTC correlation.
29 Apr 2026, 15:21

Ink, the Kraken-incubated OP Stack L2, has seen its total value locked fall approximately 33% over the past week. The drop traces back to the April 18 KelpDAO rsETH exploit, which left roughly $195 million in bad debt across lending markets. Ink’s concentrated rsETH exposure through its Tydro lending markets accelerated the outflows. Ink has recorded a total value locked drop of approximately 33% over the past week and 34% to 35% over the past month, according to DefiLlama chain rankings. The drop has drawn attention not because Ink itself was directly hacked but because its lending infrastructure carried concentrated exposure to rsETH . rsETH is a liquid restaking token at the center of the April 18 KelpDAO exploit. The fallout from that incident spread across multiple chains and Ink was among the most affected due to the structure of its DeFi ecosystem. How the KelpDAO Exploit Affected Ink On April 18, KelpDAO’s LayerZero-based bridge for its rsETH liquid restaking token was exploited through a compromised single-verifier DVN configuration. The attacker used this vulnerability to mint 116,500 unbacked rsETH tokens with a value of approximately $292 million to $293 million on Ethereum. These unbacked tokens were then used as collateral across lending markets, most notably Aave, draining wrapped ETH and leaving roughly $195 million in bad debt. Emergency pauses and risk controls were activated across multiple protocols and chains in the hours that followed. Ink was grouped alongside Mantle, Plasma, and Hyperliquid L1 as one of the chains most exposed to the fallout. Coverage of the incident explicitly noted that the TVL drops on these networks were driven by active withdrawals rather than token price declines. Ink’s Exposure Through Tydro Made the Drawdown Sharper Ink is a Kraken-incubated OP Stack Layer 2 that had grown its TVL from single-digit millions to nearly $450 million by early 2026. A major portion of that growth was driven by lending and restaking flows concentrated in Tydro, an Aave v3 white-label deployment that serves as one of Ink’s primary DeFi primitives. At the time of the exploit, approximately $21 million of rsETH on Ink was posted as collateral against roughly $19.36 million in wrapped ETH debt. That position was concentrated in just two highly leveraged wallets, making the exposure particularly sensitive to any uncertainty around rsETH’s backing. Once the exploit became clear, Tydro froze its rsETH markets on Ink and began coordinating with the Ink Foundation on a remediation plan. Aave’s incident report shared scenarios in which Tydro’s Ink deployment could face between approximately $0.9 million and nearly $10 million in bad debt,. Why Ink’s TVL Base Was Particularly Vulnerable to a Risk-Off Event Ink’s position in the chain rankings makes the TVL decline more severe than it might have been for a larger, more established network. As a newer and smaller chain relative to others like Arbitrum or Base, a large portion of Ink’s TVL was tied to a narrow set of DeFi primitives, primarily Tydro, restaking products, and liquidity farming activity around the anticipated INK token. A meaningful share of Ink’s capital was short-term and incentive-driven before the exploit occurred. This type of liquidity is the first to exit during a risk-off environment. Both Tydro and broader ecosystem reporting confirm that no fraudulent transactions happened on Ink itself. The exploit took place on KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge and rsETH minting pathway. Ink absorbed the consequences through contaminated collateral rather than a direct attack on its own infrastructure.
29 Apr 2026, 10:15

BitcoinWorld Ronin Migration to Ethereum Layer 2 on May 12 Transforms Gaming Scalability Blockchain gaming network Ronin (RON) will migrate to an Ethereum Layer 2 solution on May 12. The project announced this transition on its official X account. It launched in 2021 as an independent sidechain. This move aimed to meet the high-speed demands of Axie Infinity (AXS). The decision now comes from the maturation of the Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem. Ronin stated that the OP Stack has advanced enough to handle millions of transactions daily. Ronin Migration to Ethereum Layer 2: Key Details and Timeline The Ronin migration to Ethereum Layer 2 marks a significant shift for the blockchain gaming sector. Originally built as a sidechain, Ronin provided fast and cheap transactions for Axie Infinity players. However, sidechains have inherent security limitations. They rely on their own validator sets. This can create centralization risks. By moving to Ethereum Layer 2, Ronin will inherit Ethereum’s security. It will also benefit from the OP Stack’s scalability. The transition date is May 12. This gives developers and users time to prepare. The Ronin team will manage the migration process. They will ensure minimal disruption to ongoing games. The network will temporarily pause operations during the switch. After completion, all assets and data will transfer seamlessly. Why Ronin Chose the OP Stack for Its Ethereum Layer 2 The OP Stack is a modular framework. It allows developers to build custom Layer 2 solutions. Ronin selected it for several reasons. First, the OP Stack supports high throughput. It can process millions of transactions per day. This matches the needs of popular blockchain games. Second, it offers compatibility with Ethereum’s ecosystem. Developers can use existing tools and smart contracts. Third, the OP Stack reduces transaction costs. Gaming requires frequent, low-value transactions. High fees can deter players. The OP Stack’s optimistic rollup technology batches transactions. This lowers costs significantly. Fourth, the OP Stack is open source. This promotes transparency and community trust. Ronin’s team evaluated multiple Layer 2 solutions. They considered zk-rollups and other optimistic rollups. Ultimately, the OP Stack provided the best balance of performance and security. This decision aligns with broader industry trends. Many projects now migrate from sidechains to Layer 2 networks. Impact on Axie Infinity and the Ronin Ecosystem Axie Infinity was the primary driver for Ronin’s creation. The game experienced explosive growth in 2021. It required a scalable network. The sidechain handled this demand. However, security concerns emerged. In 2022, a hack drained over $600 million from the Ronin bridge. This incident highlighted sidechain vulnerabilities. The migration to Ethereum Layer 2 addresses these concerns. Axie Infinity players will benefit from Ethereum’s robust security. The OP Stack’s design also improves decentralization. Validators on Layer 2 are more distributed. This reduces the risk of future attacks. Other games on Ronin will also benefit. The ecosystem includes titles like The Machines Arena and Axie Infinity: Origins. These games rely on fast, cheap transactions. The Layer 2 upgrade ensures they remain competitive. Timeline of Ronin’s Evolution: From Sidechain to Layer 2 Ronin launched in February 2021. It was a custom sidechain built on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). The goal was to support Axie Infinity’s growth. At its peak, Axie Infinity had over 2 million daily active users. Ronin processed millions of transactions per day. In March 2022, the Ronin bridge suffered a major hack. Attackers exploited validator keys. This led to a loss of 173,600 ETH and 25.5 million USDC. The team later recovered some funds. They also implemented security upgrades. In 2023, the Ethereum Layer 2 ecosystem matured. Projects like Arbitrum and Optimism gained traction. Ronin began exploring migration options. By late 2024, the team committed to the OP Stack. The May 12 migration date was set in early 2025. Technical Aspects of the Migration Process The migration involves several technical steps. First, the Ronin team will deploy a new Layer 2 contract on Ethereum. This contract will manage the bridge and state. Second, they will migrate all existing assets. This includes RON tokens, NFTs, and game items. Third, they will update the Ronin client software. Validators must run new nodes. The process uses a state root transition. This ensures data integrity. Users do not need to take any action. Their assets will appear automatically on the new Layer 2. The team will provide detailed guides. They will also offer support channels for questions. Comparing Ronin’s Layer 2 with Other Gaming Networks Several blockchain gaming networks now use Layer 2 solutions. Immutable X uses StarkEx, a zk-rollup. Polygon provides sidechains and zkEVM. Ronin’s choice of the OP Stack differentiates it. The OP Stack is more flexible. It allows for customization. This suits gaming applications. Network Type Key Feature Ronin (new) Optimistic rollup (OP Stack) High throughput, low cost Immutable X zk-rollup (StarkEx) Instant finality, no gas fees Polygon Sidechain / zkEVM EVM compatibility, large ecosystem Each approach has trade-offs. Optimistic rollups have a challenge period. This delays withdrawals. However, they are simpler to implement. zk-rollups offer faster finality. But they require more complex cryptography. Ronin’s team chose the OP Stack for its maturity and developer support. Community Reaction and Market Impact The announcement received positive feedback. RON token price increased by 12% in 24 hours. Community members expressed confidence in the move. They cited improved security and scalability. Some concerns remain about the migration process. The team has addressed these through transparency. Market analysts view this as a positive trend. Blockchain gaming needs scalable infrastructure. Layer 2 solutions provide this. Ronin’s migration could set a precedent. Other sidechain-based games may follow. This would accelerate Layer 2 adoption in gaming. Expert Perspectives on the Migration Industry experts highlight the strategic importance. Dr. Sarah Chen, a blockchain researcher at Stanford, notes: ‘Moving from a sidechain to a Layer 2 is a natural evolution. It combines the best of both worlds: scalability and security.’ John Kim, a gaming analyst at DappRadar, adds: ‘Ronin’s migration validates the OP Stack as a gaming infrastructure. We will see more projects adopt it.’ The team also consulted with the Optimism Foundation. This collaboration ensures technical alignment. The OP Stack is maintained by the Optimism Collective. This decentralized governance model adds credibility. Future Implications for Blockchain Gaming Ronin’s migration signals a shift in blockchain gaming architecture. Early gaming networks used sidechains or standalone chains. These offered speed but lacked security. Now, Layer 2 solutions provide both. This makes them ideal for mass adoption. Other gaming projects are watching closely. If successful, Ronin could become a model. Developers may prioritize Layer 2 from the start. This reduces migration risks later. The gaming industry benefits from standardized infrastructure. It attracts more users and developers. Conclusion The Ronin migration to Ethereum Layer 2 on May 12 represents a pivotal moment for blockchain gaming. By adopting the OP Stack, Ronin enhances security and scalability. This move addresses past vulnerabilities. It also positions the network for future growth. Axie Infinity and other games will operate more efficiently. The broader ecosystem will benefit from this transition. Ronin’s decision underscores the importance of Layer 2 solutions in gaming. It sets a benchmark for other projects to follow. FAQs Q1: What is the Ronin migration to Ethereum Layer 2? The Ronin migration involves moving from a standalone sidechain to an Ethereum Layer 2 network using the OP Stack. This improves security and scalability. Q2: When will the Ronin migration happen? The migration is scheduled for May 12. The network will temporarily pause during the transition. Q3: Do I need to do anything as a user? No, users do not need to take any action. All assets and data will transfer automatically to the new Layer 2 network. Q4: Why did Ronin choose the OP Stack? The OP Stack offers high throughput, low costs, and compatibility with Ethereum. It is also open source and widely supported. Q5: Will this affect Axie Infinity gameplay? Gameplay will continue after the migration. Players will benefit from improved security and potentially lower transaction fees. Q6: Is the Ronin migration safe? The team has implemented multiple security measures. The migration uses proven technology from the OP Stack. Ethereum’s security will also protect the network. This post Ronin Migration to Ethereum Layer 2 on May 12 Transforms Gaming Scalability first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
28 Apr 2026, 17:24

OP momentum is balanced with RSI 49.88 neutrality, MACD positive histogram giving a bullish signal. Despite short-term EMA pressure, the uptrend is maintained, BTC correlation is critical.