News
20 May 2026, 06:00
XRP ‘Under Heavy Resistance’ After Key $1.50 Rejection – Is A Drop To $1 Next?

While XRP attempts to hold a crucial area, some analysts have pointed to key indicators that could dictate whether the recent pullback is temporary or marks the start of a deeper correction. Related Reading: Bitcoin Rally On The Line: Analyst Explains Why This Weekly Close Is Critical XRP Rally Faces Critical Resistance On Tuesday, XRP continued its recent decline, falling to the $1.35 area, its lowest level since late April. The cryptocurrency has been trading between $1.36 and $1.50 over the past month, attempting to break out of the upper boundary on multiple occasions. Last Thursday, the altcoin rallied above this key resistance on the CLARITY Act progress, reaching a two-month high of $1.54. However, the price was quickly rejected from this level, tracing roughly 12% over the past five days. As the altcoin retested the $1.35 area, market observer ChartNerd stated that XRP risks another price correction toward new lows, affirming that “the data speaks for itself.” The analyst highlighted some concerning signals for the altcoin’s rally, including a major resistance area above and the confirmation of a death cross in the weekly Stoch RSI. He pointed out that the weekly 20 and 50 EMAs, sitting at $1.50 and $1.80, are two crucial resistance levels that had not been retested since their January 2026 crossover, which led to XRP’s drop to its February low of $1.11. He also noted that the weekly Stoch RSI crossover has previously marked a local top for XRP, with the last two crosses producing deeper corrections and the latest one coinciding with the relief rally that led to the weekly EMA death cross four months ago. After the recent rally to $1.54, the price has now retested the weekly 20 EMA for the first time since the January crossover. A failure to successfully break above this level and turn it into sustained support “will likely open the next leg down later this year,” the analyst said. ‘Next Big Move’ Targets $1? ChartNerd emphasized XRP must reclaim both EMAs and turn them into support to invalidate the bearish scenario, but added that “it just doesn’t feel like the right time yet.” Even if the altcoin breaks toward $1.80, the analyst considers that the price will likely fail to hold it long-term and “at least come back to, at a minimum, fill in most of this wick back down towards the lower dollar levels.” He has explained that a rejection from these EMAs could potentially send the altcoin toward a cycle bottom of $0.70, as it is a previous level of macro resistance that hasn’t been retested yet. Meanwhile, analyst Ali Martinez affirmed that XRP is ready for a big price move. He highlighted that the altcoin has been developing the “tightest Bollinger Band squeeze” on the three-day chart in over a year, calling the current compression zone a “definitive ‘no-trade zone.’” Related Reading: Solana Fails Channel Breakout—$78 Support The Next Destination? He noted that when volatility compresses this tightly, “it’s a signal that a violent price expansion is approaching.” Therefore, the market observer advised investors to wait for a clean three-day candlestick close out of XRP’s current range, between $1.29 and $1.50, to confirm the next major trend direction. A close above the upper boundary would signal an expansion toward the $1.80 is likely. On the contrary, a breakdown from the lower boundary would invalidate the immediate bullish structure and open the door for a deeper correction toward the $1.00 psychological support. Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
20 May 2026, 05:58
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP outlook as US Senate targets Trump’s Iran war powers

Crypto traders are closely monitoring the US Senate’s procedural push to limit military action against Iran, weighing how a reduction in geopolitical risk premiums might impact liquidity flow into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP. According to recent reporting, Senate lawmakers have approved a war powers resolution aimed at limiting President Donald Trump’s ability to continue military operations against Iran without congressional approval by a 50 to 47 margin, with four Republican senators joining Democrats in support of the measure. The legislation, introduced by Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, invokes the War Powers Act of 1973 and seeks to restrict unauthorised military action by requiring congressional authorisation for continued hostilities. Rising fuel and shipping costs linked to instability around the Strait of Hormuz have already weighed on global markets, while investors continue monitoring the risk of prolonged disruptions to energy supplies. For crypto traders, the Senate vote introduced a fresh macroeconomic narrative. Markets have spent months reacting to geopolitical uncertainty, particularly after repeated military escalations in the Middle East triggered spikes in oil prices and pushed investors toward defensive positioning. Bitcoin has struggled to reclaim higher levels during this period, while Ethereum and XRP have also traded within narrow ranges amid a visible lack of risk appetite. Signs of de-escalation could support risk sentiment Energy traders had previously priced in the possibility of wider supply disruptions if military activity intensified near critical shipping routes. According to the uploaded report, the Senate’s move has been interpreted by some market participants as an early de-escalation signal because it increases political pressure on the White House to justify continued military engagement. Market analysts have argued that any reduction in geopolitical tensions could improve sentiment across speculative markets, including cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin, which often reacts sharply to macroeconomic headlines, has historically posted relief rallies following signs of diplomatic progress or reduced conflict risks. As previously covered on Invezz , any form of de-escalation headlines over the past months had triggered immediate 3% to 5% gains in Bitcoin prices as traders rotated back into higher-risk assets. At the same time, Ethereum’s outlook has also become tied to the return of liquidity into decentralised finance markets. Periods of military uncertainty have historically reduced activity across decentralized applications as investors focused on preserving capital rather than deploying funds into yield-generating protocols. Reduced geopolitical stress, the report added, has typically encouraged higher on-chain activity and stronger Ethereum demand. Attention has also turned toward XRP because of its role in cross-border payment infrastructure. Escalating geopolitical conflicts often increase compliance risks and banking uncertainty, factors that can slow institutional engagement with blockchain-based payment networks. If tensions cool and financial conditions stabilize, XRP could benefit from renewed confidence among firms exploring digital asset integrations for international settlements. Will the resolution pass? Despite the procedural victory in advancing this war powers resolution, the realistic odds of it becoming a binding law remain exceptionally low due to the steep constitutional steeplechase it faces. While the 50 to 47 vote demonstrates a crack in party unity, with four Republicans crossing the aisle to vote with the majority of Democrats, this margin is nowhere near the numbers required to survive the next legislative phases. To successfully pass the full Senate, the resolution must survive intense floor debates and a final vote, which will require keeping a fragile coalition together while navigating a chamber where several members are frequently absent due to ongoing campaign obligations. Even if the resolution successfully clears the Senate floor, its journey faces a massive roadblock in the House of Representatives, where leadership has historically maintained a deeply protective stance over executive military discretion. House leadership has explicitly criticised similar war powers measures, likening legislative constraints during ongoing operations to a strategic misstep that compromises national security interests. Because the legislative body remains structurally aligned with the administration's broader foreign policy objectives, organising the necessary majority to pass an identical resolution in the lower chamber presents an almost insurmountable challenge for anti-war lawmakers. Even if both chambers approve the bill, Trump could still veto the resolution. Overriding a presidential veto would require a two-thirds majority vote in both the Senate and House, a threshold the current coalition supporting the measure appears far from reaching. At the time of publication, Bitcoin and the broader crypto market have yet to react to the latest development. Bitcoin was hovering around $77,000 with less than 1% gains on the day, while Ethereum and XRP were navigating losses between 1-3%. The post Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP outlook as US Senate targets Trump’s Iran war powers appeared first on Invezz
20 May 2026, 05:40
Silver Price Steady Above $73.50 as Inflationary Pressures Support Safe-Haven Demand

BitcoinWorld Silver Price Steady Above $73.50 as Inflationary Pressures Support Safe-Haven Demand Silver prices held steady above the $73.50 mark during Tuesday’s trading session, as rising inflationary expectations continued to underpin demand for precious metals as a store of value. The XAG/USD pair traded in a narrow range, reflecting a cautious market awaiting further economic data and central bank policy signals. Inflationary Risks Bolster Precious Metals Appeal Persistent inflationary pressures, driven by rising energy costs and supply chain constraints, have reinforced silver’s traditional role as a hedge against currency debasement. Market participants are closely monitoring consumer price index (CPI) data and producer price index (PPI) releases, which are expected to show further upward momentum. The Federal Reserve’s cautious stance on interest rate cuts has also contributed to a favorable environment for non-yielding assets like silver, as real yields remain suppressed. Technical Outlook for XAG/USD From a technical perspective, silver has found solid support near the $73.00 level, with the 50-day moving average acting as a key floor. Resistance is seen around $75.50, a level that has capped gains in recent weeks. A break above this resistance could open the door toward the $77.00 region, while a drop below $73.00 might trigger a test of the $71.50 support zone. The relative strength index (RSI) remains neutral, suggesting room for further upside momentum without entering overbought territory. Market Drivers to Watch Beyond inflation data, industrial demand for silver continues to provide underlying support. The metal’s extensive use in solar panels, electronics, and medical devices means that global manufacturing trends directly influence its price trajectory. Recent economic data from China, the world’s largest industrial consumer, has shown signs of stabilization, which could boost silver demand in the coming months. Additionally, geopolitical uncertainties, including trade tensions and regional conflicts, have kept safe-haven flows intact. Conclusion Silver’s current consolidation above $73.50 reflects a market balancing inflationary tailwinds against a cautious macroeconomic outlook. While the near-term path remains dependent on incoming economic data and Fed policy signals, the broader backdrop of elevated inflation and steady industrial demand supports a constructive view for precious metals. Investors should monitor key support and resistance levels as the market digests upcoming reports. FAQs Q1: Why is silver price staying above $73.50? Silver is supported by rising inflationary expectations, which increase demand for precious metals as a hedge against currency depreciation. Technical support near $73.00 and steady industrial demand also contribute to price stability. Q2: What factors could push silver above $75.50? A break above $75.50 resistance would likely require stronger-than-expected inflation data, a weaker U.S. dollar, or a renewed surge in safe-haven buying due to geopolitical tensions. Positive industrial demand data from China could also provide the necessary catalyst. Q3: How does inflation directly affect silver prices? Rising inflation erodes the purchasing power of fiat currencies, prompting investors to seek assets that retain value over time, such as silver and gold. Higher inflation also reduces real interest rates, making non-yielding precious metals more attractive compared to bonds or cash. This post Silver Price Steady Above $73.50 as Inflationary Pressures Support Safe-Haven Demand first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
20 May 2026, 05:37
Truth Social Crypto ETFs Withdrawn After Strategy Shift

The firm said it is shifting from Securities Act of 1933 products to structures under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to pursue more flexible investment strategies with stronger investor protections. The withdrawals also come as US crypto ETF demand weakens in 2026 and competition in the Bitcoin ETF market intensifies. Truth Social Pulls Multiple Crypto ETF Plans Asset manager Yorkville America withdrew several crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) applications that were filed on behalf of Trump Media & Technology Group, the company behind the social media platform Truth Social. Among the withdrawn applications were the proposed Truth Social Bitcoin ETF, the Truth Social Bitcoin & Ethereum ETF, and the Truth Social Crypto Blue Chip ETF. According to Yorkville America, the move is part of a transition away from products registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and toward investment structures governed by the Investment Company Act of 1940. The company explained that the newer framework will provide more flexibility for creating innovative, rules-based investment strategies while also offering stronger investor protections and potential tax advantages. Yorkville America stated that the decision was made after concluding that the “40 Act” structure was better suited for the firm’s long-term goals and expanding investor base. However, the company did not indicate whether it plans to refile any crypto-related ETF applications under the new framework in the future. The withdrawals came during a period of heightened political scrutiny surrounding Donald Trump’s involvement in the crypto sector. Since Trump returned to office, Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly questioned whether his financial connections to crypto businesses could create conflicts of interest with his presidential duties. A lot of attention has been directed toward World Liberty Financial, a crypto platform tied to Trump and several of his business associates. At the same time, the crypto ETF market has experienced a slowdown in 2026. Demand for spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States weakened quite a bit compared to the explosive inflows seen in 2025. Recent Bitcoin ETF flows (Source: Farside Investors) Current net inflows for US spot Bitcoin ETFs stand at roughly $790 million this year, which is a sharp decline from the approximately $25 billion that flowed into these products last year. Much of the remaining demand has been concentrated in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF. Spot Ethereum ETFs have also struggled, and recorded big net outflows during the year. Newly launched altcoin ETFs also failed to generate the same enthusiasm that earlier crypto investment products enjoyed. X post from James Seyffart Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart suggested that Yorkville America’s decision may also have been influenced by the very competitive Bitcoin ETF market, especially as firms compete on fees and investor incentives. One example is the recently launched Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust ETF, which reportedly introduced one of the lowest management fees in the sector at just 0.14%. The now-withdrawn ETF products were originally expected to form part of Trump Media’s expansion into digital finance through its Truth.fi platform.
20 May 2026, 05:35
BTC/USDT Spot CVD Chart Analysis: May 20, 5:00 a.m. UTC

BitcoinWorld BTC/USDT Spot CVD Chart Analysis: May 20, 5:00 a.m. UTC The Spot Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) chart for the BTC/USDT trading pair offers traders a granular view of order book dynamics. As of 5:00 a.m. UTC on May 20, the chart presents two key layers of data: the Volume Heatmap and the CVD indicator, which together can help identify potential price levels of interest. Understanding the Volume Heatmap The upper portion of the chart displays the Volume Heatmap, which tracks trading activity at various price levels. The background color intensifies when the price lingers in a specific range or undergoes significant movement. These brighter zones often act as markers for potential support and resistance areas, as they represent price levels where substantial trading volume has occurred. Interpreting the Cumulative Volume Delta Below the heatmap, the Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) indicator provides a running tally of buy and sell orders, categorized by trade size. As buy orders accumulate, the corresponding colored line rises. For instance, the yellow line tracks orders ranging from $100 to $1,000, while the brown line monitors large institutional-sized orders between $1 million and $10 million. Divergences between these lines can offer clues about shifting market sentiment. Why This Matters for Traders For active traders, the CVD chart provides a real-time snapshot of order flow, helping to distinguish between retail and large-scale activity. A rising brown line, for example, may signal accumulation by institutional players, while a flattening yellow line could indicate reduced retail participation. This information can be used to confirm breakouts or identify potential reversals. Conclusion The Spot CVD chart for BTC/USDT at 5:00 a.m. UTC on May 20 offers a data-driven perspective on market structure. By combining the Volume Heatmap with the CVD indicator, traders can gain a deeper understanding of price levels where buying or selling pressure is concentrated, aiding in more informed decision-making. FAQs Q1: What is the Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD)? A: CVD is a technical indicator that tracks the net difference between buying and selling volume over time, categorized by trade size. It helps traders identify whether buyers or sellers are in control at specific price levels. Q2: How does the Volume Heatmap differ from CVD? A: The Volume Heatmap shows the total trading volume at each price level, highlighting areas of high activity. CVD, on the other hand, shows the cumulative delta between buy and sell orders, indicating directional pressure. Q3: Can the CVD chart predict price movements? A: No single indicator can predict price movements with certainty. The CVD chart is a tool for analyzing order flow and market sentiment, which can be used in conjunction with other forms of analysis to inform trading decisions. This post BTC/USDT Spot CVD Chart Analysis: May 20, 5:00 a.m. UTC first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
20 May 2026, 05:31
JPMorgan: Bitcoin Races Ahead of Ethereum

Ether and the broader altcoin market are caught in a multi-year trend of underperformance against Bitcoin.



































