hodler

26 Mar 2026, 12:15

Global economy gets downgrade as Middle East conflict disrupts energy supply, trade routes

The global economy just got downgraded, and the reason is clear. The OECD said on Thursday that the war tied to the U.S. and Israel attacking Iran is now hitting growth and pushing prices higher across the economy. Before this conflict, the global economy was actually doing better than expected, with the OECD saying that Trump’s tariffs last year did not break growth. The OECD added that it was preparing to raise its forecast to 3.2% from 2.9%. That improvement came from strong AI investment and lower interest rates. Then late February changed everything, as major headlines became dominated by America and Israel’s war on Iran, where key energy and transport sites were damaged. The Strait of Hormuz became restricted and has now been “officially halted for all enemies of Iran,” according to their Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi. War disrupts energy supply and drags global growth projections down The OECD said the economy is now being pulled in two directions. Asa Johansson, the policy studies director, said, “The forecast is shaped by two counteracting forces.” Asa said the economy was stronger than expected at first, then the war started dragging it down. She also said the situation is uncertain because no one knows how long the energy shock will last or how wide it will spread. The OECD kept its 2026 global growth outlook unchanged under a base case where energy prices fall later this year. But it also gave a worse scenario. If energy stays expensive, the economy grows just 2.6% this year. That is more than half a percentage point below what was expected before the war. The hit in 2027 would be bigger. Country forecasts show a split inside the economy. The U.S. outlook was raised to 2% from 1.7%, supported by AI spending. Europe moved the other way. The eurozone is now seen at 0.8% instead of 1.2%. China stayed at 4.4%. The U.K. saw the biggest cut. Growth is now 0.7%, down from 1.2%. Asa said the U.K. was already weak before the war began. Inflation rises across major economies as G7 warns about damage Inflation is now rising across the economy, even if growth damage stays limited. The OECD said inflation across G20 countries will average 4% this year. That was previously seen at 2.8%. The U.S. is now expected at 4.2% instead of 3%. The U.K. is at 4% instead of 2.5%. The eurozone is now 2.6% instead of 1.9%. Japan is at 2.4%, slightly higher than before. The OECD said inflation could cool again in 2027 if energy prices fall back to levels seen before the war. Because of that, central banks may not need to raise rates if the increase in prices does not last long. Outside the OECD, pressure is building. European members of the G7 warned the war is already damaging the economy before a key summit in France. Foreign ministers from the U.S., U.K., Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan are meeting for two days. Iran and Ukraine are the main topics. European officials want the U.S. to find a way to reduce tensions with Iran. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is expected to arrive on Friday. Talks are stuck, and there is still no ceasefire. There is also concern about further escalation, including possible ground operations. Boris Pistorius, Germany’s defense minister, said, “To make it crystal clear, this war is a catastrophe for the world’s economies.” Boris also said Germany and its partners were not consulted before the conflict. He said, “Nobody asked us before. It’s not our war.” If you want a calmer entry point into DeFi crypto without the usual hype, start with this free video.

26 Mar 2026, 12:10

USD War-Driven Bid and Funding Stress Risks: Critical Analysis of 2025 Currency Pressures

BitcoinWorld USD War-Driven Bid and Funding Stress Risks: Critical Analysis of 2025 Currency Pressures Global currency markets face unprecedented pressure in 2025 as geopolitical conflicts drive a war-driven bid for the US dollar while exposing critical funding stress risks. According to analysis from Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), these dual forces create complex challenges for policymakers and investors worldwide. The dollar’s traditional safe-haven status now confronts structural vulnerabilities in global funding markets. Understanding the USD War-Driven Bid Phenomenon Geopolitical tensions consistently trigger capital flows toward perceived safe assets. Consequently, the US dollar typically strengthens during periods of international conflict. Historical data shows the dollar index rising approximately 8-12% during major geopolitical crises over the past two decades. However, current conditions differ significantly from previous episodes. Multiple simultaneous conflicts create sustained pressure rather than temporary spikes. Regional tensions in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region maintain constant market anxiety. Furthermore, these conflicts disrupt global supply chains and commodity markets. Energy price volatility particularly affects currency valuations and trade balances. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy stance interacts with these geopolitical factors. Higher interest rates traditionally support currency strength, but they also increase global borrowing costs. Emerging market economies face particular challenges servicing dollar-denominated debt during such periods. This dynamic creates feedback loops that amplify market stress. Funding Stress Risks in Global Markets Global dollar funding markets show increasing signs of strain as geopolitical tensions persist. The US dollar serves as the world’s primary reserve currency and international trade medium. Therefore, dollar scarcity during crises creates systemic risks across financial markets. Several indicators currently signal growing funding pressures. Key Indicators of Funding Stress Cross-currency basis swaps reveal the premium non-US entities pay for dollar funding. Recent widening suggests increasing scarcity. Additionally, Treasury market liquidity metrics show deterioration during periods of heightened geopolitical news. Foreign central bank holdings of US Treasuries also demonstrate changing patterns as nations manage currency reserves. The following table illustrates recent funding stress indicators: Indicator Current Level Historical Average Stress Signal EUR/USD 3M Basis Swap -35 bps -15 bps Elevated Treasury Market Depth $120M $250M Reduced Fed Swap Line Usage $12B $5B Increasing Market participants monitor several critical developments. First, reduced dealer balance sheet capacity limits market-making in dollar assets. Second, regulatory changes affect banks’ willingness to intermediate dollar flows. Third, geopolitical sanctions restrict certain nations’ access to dollar clearing systems. These factors collectively increase funding friction. Federal Reserve Policy and Global Implications The Federal Reserve faces complex policy trade-offs between domestic objectives and global dollar stability. Historically, the Fed served as global lender of last resort during dollar shortages. Current conditions test this role amid persistent inflation concerns. The central bank’s dual mandate conflicts with international responsibilities during geopolitical crises. Recent Federal Open Market Committee statements acknowledge global financial stability considerations. However, primary focus remains on domestic price stability and maximum employment. This creates tension when international dollar funding markets experience stress. Foreign central banks increasingly utilize Fed swap lines to access dollar liquidity. Several structural factors amplify current challenges: De-globalization trends reduce natural dollar flows through trade Reserve diversification by some nations reduces dollar holdings Digital currency development creates potential long-term alternatives Fiscal constraints limit policy response options in many economies Market analysts closely watch Treasury Department actions alongside Fed policy. The Exchange Stabilization Fund provides another tool for addressing currency market disruptions. Coordination between monetary and fiscal authorities becomes crucial during periods of simultaneous geopolitical and financial stress. Historical Context and Current Divergences Previous geopolitical crises offer important lessons but imperfect parallels. The 2008 financial crisis demonstrated how dollar funding stress can trigger global contagion. The 2020 pandemic response showed central banks’ capacity for coordinated action. Current conditions combine elements of both precedents while introducing new complexities. Several factors distinguish the current environment. First, higher baseline interest rates reduce policy space for stimulus. Second, elevated government debt levels constrain fiscal responses. Third, fragmented international relations complicate coordinated policy actions. Fourth, technological changes accelerate market reactions to geopolitical developments. BBH analysts identify three critical monitoring areas: Dollar funding costs for emerging market corporations and governments Functioning of critical dollar payment and settlement infrastructure Behavior of non-bank financial institutions during stress episodes Historical analysis suggests markets typically underestimate tail risks during geopolitical events. The 1998 Russian default and 2011 European debt crisis both demonstrated how localized events can trigger global funding stress. Current multiple simultaneous conflicts increase systemic interconnectedness risks. Market Structure Vulnerabilities and Resilience Modern financial market structure contains both vulnerabilities and resilience mechanisms. The growth of non-bank financial intermediation changes traditional stress transmission channels. Hedge funds, money market funds, and other institutional investors now play larger roles in dollar funding markets. Their behavior during crises differs from traditional banking sector responses. Regulatory reforms since 2008 improved banking sector resilience but may have shifted risks elsewhere. The Volcker Rule and Basel III requirements changed banks’ market-making activities. Consequently, Treasury market liquidity now depends more heavily on non-bank participants. These entities face different constraints during stress periods. Several structural vulnerabilities require monitoring: Leveraged positions in relative value and basis trades Concentration risks among major dollar clearing banks Operational dependencies on critical financial infrastructure Behavioral factors driving herding during uncertainty Market infrastructure has evolved to address some vulnerabilities. The Fed’s Standing Repo Facility provides backstop liquidity to primary dealers. Foreign and International Monetary Authorities repo program supports official institutions. Continuous linked settlement systems reduce settlement risk in currency markets. However, these mechanisms remain untested during simultaneous geopolitical and funding stress. Geopolitical Scenarios and Currency Implications Different geopolitical developments would produce distinct currency market outcomes. Analysts typically consider three primary scenarios with varying probabilities and impacts. Each scenario carries different implications for dollar strength and funding conditions. Scenario 1: Contained Regional Conflicts Limited escalation maintains current pressure levels. The dollar retains safe-haven status with moderate appreciation. Funding stress remains manageable through existing facilities. This baseline scenario assumes no major new conflict zones emerge through 2025. Scenario 2: Expanded Multilateral Conflict Additional regions experience significant escalation. The dollar strengthens dramatically as capital seeks safety. Funding markets experience severe stress requiring extraordinary policy responses. Traditional safe-haven assets might decouple in unexpected ways. Scenario 3: Diplomatic Resolution Progress Negotiations produce meaningful de-escalation in key regions. The dollar retreats from elevated levels as risk appetite improves. Funding conditions normalize relatively quickly. However, structural vulnerabilities exposed during the crisis period remain. Each scenario requires different portfolio adjustments and risk management approaches. Currency hedges that work in one scenario might fail in another. Diversification across currencies and assets becomes particularly challenging during geopolitical uncertainty. Conclusion The USD war-driven bid and funding stress risks present complex challenges for global markets in 2025. Geopolitical conflicts drive traditional safe-haven flows while exposing structural vulnerabilities in dollar funding mechanisms. Federal Reserve policy must balance domestic objectives with international financial stability concerns. Market participants should monitor cross-currency basis swaps, Treasury market liquidity, and Fed facility usage as key stress indicators. Historical precedents provide guidance but current multiple simultaneous conflicts create unique conditions. Ultimately, the dollar’s role as global reserve currency faces its most significant test in decades amid these war-driven bid and funding stress risks. FAQs Q1: What causes a war-driven bid for the US dollar? Investors typically seek safe-haven assets during geopolitical uncertainty. The US dollar benefits from America’s economic size, deep financial markets, and historical stability. Consequently, capital flows toward dollar-denominated assets during international conflicts. Q2: How does funding stress affect currency markets? Funding stress increases the cost and reduces the availability of dollars in global markets. This can trigger asset sales, reduce liquidity, and amplify price movements. Severe stress may require central bank intervention to maintain market functioning. Q3: What tools does the Federal Reserve have to address dollar funding stress? The Fed maintains several facilities including swap lines with foreign central banks, the Standing Repo Facility, and the FIMA repo program. These tools provide dollar liquidity to eligible institutions during stress periods. Q4: How do geopolitical events typically affect the dollar’s value? Historical analysis shows the dollar appreciates during most geopolitical crises. However, the magnitude and duration depend on the conflict’s scale, location, and implications for US interests. Some events affecting America directly may produce different patterns. Q5: What indicators should investors watch for funding stress? Key indicators include cross-currency basis swaps, Treasury market liquidity metrics, commercial paper spreads, and usage of Federal Reserve liquidity facilities. Widening spreads and reduced liquidity typically signal increasing stress. This post USD War-Driven Bid and Funding Stress Risks: Critical Analysis of 2025 Currency Pressures first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

26 Mar 2026, 12:08

Coinbase, Fannie Mae to Enable Crypto-Backed Mortgages

The government-sponsored mortgage giant will accept Bitcoin and USDC as collateral through a new program with Better Home and Coinbase.

26 Mar 2026, 12:06

Is XRP Witnessing the Calm Before the Storm as Over-Leveraged Traders Get Wiped Out?

XRP Deleveraging Signals Healthier Market, Potential Breakout Ahead Market analyst Crypto Patel reports that XRP’s estimated leverage ratio on Binance has plummeted to 0.134, the lowest since 2024, while the price holds at $1.37 , per CoinCodex. This is a stark contrast to early 2025, when the ratio topped 0.50 during peak speculation, signaling a complete deleveraging and the clearing of over-leveraged positions. Why does this matter? Well, in highly leveraged markets, oversized positions can spark liquidation cascades, intensifying volatility. With XRP leverage now at multi-year lows, the risk of sudden shocks has eased, creating a more stable market. Binance data shows XRP volatility at 2026 lows, a potential signal that the market is positioning for a measured, sustainable move rather than chaotic swings. Notably, deleveraging often sets the stage for strong price rallies. Clearing excess leverage reduces systemic risk and allows fresh liquidity to enter. Across crypto cycles, once speculative pressure fades, genuine demand, typically from spot accumulation, drives the market, laying the groundwork for sustained upward moves. XRP Deleveraging Signals Healthier Market and Potential for Sustainable Upswing XRP should be given a keen eye since with leverage at multi-year lows, any price stabilization or uptick points to genuine accumulation rather than speculative trading. This environment often sets the stage for sustainable breakouts. XRP’s current pullback appears measured, not a reversal, and the $1.40 mark remains key, holding above it could signal a shift toward market stability and renewed upward momentum. Therefore, XRP’s deleveraging signals more than a number, it marks a cleanup of speculative excess and a shift toward a healthier market structure. With leverage at multi-year lows, risk for traders diminishes while conditions favor sustainable growth. If price action holds, XRP may be setting the stage for a significant, enduring rally, offering optimism for both retail and institutional investors. Conclusion XRP’s sharp deleveraging and record-low volatility indicate the market is resetting for sustainable growth. With speculative excess cleared and systemic risk reduced, genuine spot accumulation could fuel the next major move. Furthermore, the $1.40 level is key because if XRP holds or climbs above it and leverage stays low, the stage is set for a significant breakout and a structurally stronger uptrend.

26 Mar 2026, 12:05

Rumor: BlackRock Preparing to File for XRP ETF With Regulators

Institutional momentum continues to redefine the cryptocurrency market, as asset managers race to bridge traditional finance with digital assets. Exchange-traded funds have become a key vehicle in that transition, offering regulated exposure while unlocking new pools of capital. As this trend accelerates, XRP has re-entered the spotlight amid fresh speculation tied to one of the world’s most influential financial firms. Crypto-focused account RippleXity brought the discussion to the forefront, reporting that rumors suggest BlackRock may be preparing to file for an XRP ETF with regulators. The claim has gained traction despite lacking official confirmation, likely due to BlackRock’s history of influencing institutional involvement in crypto markets. BlackRock’s Growing Influence in Crypto Markets BlackRock has steadily expanded its presence in the digital asset sector. The firm played a pivotal role in advancing Bitcoin ETFs into mainstream finance, a development that significantly increased institutional participation. It has also explored Ethereum-based products, reinforcing its strategy to diversify exposure across leading blockchain networks. JUST IN: Rumors Emerge of BlackRock Preparing to File for $XRP ETF with Regulators. — RippleXity (@RippleXity) March 25, 2026 If BlackRock moves toward an XRP ETF , it would mark a strategic expansion beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. Such a step would signal confidence in XRP’s liquidity, infrastructure, and relevance within cross-border payment systems. XRP’s Regulatory Standing and ETF Viability Regulatory clarity remains a critical factor in any ETF approval process. XRP has experienced a complex legal journey in the United States, but recent developments have improved its standing and reduced uncertainty around its classification. This progress has reopened conversations about its suitability for institutional-grade financial products. Regulators typically evaluate market integrity, liquidity depth, and investor protection before approving ETFs. XRP would need to meet these standards convincingly. While its global trading volume and established use case strengthen its position, regulators will still apply strict scrutiny to any potential filing. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Potential Market Impact of an XRP ETF A BlackRock XRP ETF could reshape market dynamics. Many participants prefer ETFs because they eliminate the need to manage private keys or interact directly with crypto exchanges. This accessibility often drives capital inflows and enhances overall market liquidity. Past ETF approvals in the crypto sector have triggered strong bullish reactions. Even speculation involving a firm like BlackRock can influence sentiment, as traders anticipate the potential for increased demand and broader adoption. Speculation Versus Confirmed Developments Despite the growing excitement, no verified filing or official statement supports the current rumor. The narrative remains speculative, and investors must distinguish between market chatter and confirmed developments. However, the emergence of such rumors highlights XRP’s continued relevance in institutional conversations. Whether BlackRock proceeds with an ETF filing or not , the discussion signals a broader shift. Traditional finance continues to integrate digital assets, and XRP remains firmly within that evolving landscape. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Rumor: BlackRock Preparing to File for XRP ETF With Regulators appeared first on Times Tabloid .

26 Mar 2026, 12:05

Russia to obligate export firms to convert crypto proceeds into rubles.

The finance ministry in Moscow has made it clear it may soon obligate Russian companies to convert their cryptocurrency revenues into local fiat. The department also announced that the long-awaited legislation to regulate the country’s crypto market will be filed with the parliament next week. The bill must be passed by the summer, with Russia’s first legal cryptocurrency transactions expected to take place as early as this year. Minfin eyes return of Russian crypto earnings from abroad The Russian Ministry of Finance is considering ways to repatriate cryptocurrency received by firms engaged in foreign economic activities. It has just supported proposals to expand the rules requiring companies to sell their foreign currency earnings for Russian rubles to cover crypto revenues. A regulation mandating the repatriation and sale of foreign fiat expires in May, and the Minfin wants it renewed, Deputy Finance Minister Ivan Chebeskov told Russian media. Speaking to reporters at the State Duma, the lower house of parliament, the high-ranking government official confirmed this week: “Our position has always been that it makes sense to extend this decree, and to keep it in effect.” Quoted by the Interfax news agency, he also stressed that the mechanism allows Russia’s financial intelligence body, Rosfinmonitoring, to keep a close eye on such flows. Asked whether it’s also reasonable to widen its scope and include cryptocurrency transactions, the role of which has been growing in cross-border settlements under sanctions, Chebeskov remarked: “It’s quite possible … there’s definitely some logic to it.” The decree was issued in October 2023 to ensure stable exchange rates for the Russian ruble and sustain the country’s financial market. It was mainly focused on companies exporting products from the fuel and energy sector, metallurgy, the chemical and forestry industries, as well as grain farming. They were initially required to deposit no less than 40% of the foreign currency received into accounts with authorized banks and sell at least 90% of it on the domestic market. In mid-August 2025, the Russian government lowered these thresholds, but the head of the Minfin’s Financial Policy Department, Alexey Yakovlev, stated in September these could be revised, if needed. The finance ministry has been a strong proponent of the decree, repeatedly highlighting its positive impact on the forex market. “We observed a stabilization of the ruble exchange rate, meaning the mechanism demonstrated its effectiveness,” Yakovlev said at the time. Russia to regulate its crypto market this spring Meanwhile, the Ministry of Finance also announced that a draft law designed to regulate Russia’s crypto market will be filed within days. Speaking at Crypto Summit , Russia’s main cryptocurrency event held March 25 – 26, Alexey Yakovlev revealed: “A government meeting is expected, and the bill will be submitted to the State Duma next week.” The legislation has been developed in collaboration with the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) and is based on its regulatory concept released in December 2025. The monetary authority wants to see it adopted during the spring session of the house, said Ekaterina Lozgacheva, director of the bank’s Financial Market Strategy Department. That means Russia should have a comprehensive framework for digital assets in place by July 1, 2026, at the latest, as indicated in earlier statements by its representatives. Quoted by Interfax, Lozgacheva also emphasized: “By the end of the year, the first legal [crypto] transactions will be possible.” She added that the CBR is prepared to issue all necessary additional regulations in the second half of 2026 to give market participants the clear rules they need. The law will introduce a “relatively simple” licensing regime for crypto exchanges, Lozgacheva unveiled, and these will be required to comply with anti-money laundering regulations. Crypto transactions will be processed by traditional financial market players, too, such as stock exchanges, brokers, and trustees under their existing licenses. Crypto depositories will have to obtain a separate license as their activity is associated with specific management requirements due to cybersecurity and information risks. Bank of Russia’s policy document envisages recognizing cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as “monetary assets” that can be bought and sold, but may not be used for payments. Besides qualified investors, ordinary Russians will be granted access to major digital currencies like Bitcoin, although their purchases will be limited to 300,000 rubles a year (less than $4,000). If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .