Invest ideasNews
30 Apr 2026, 10:17
Shiba Inu Whale Awakens as 800 Billion SHIB Moves to Exchange
Shiba Inu’s price has stalled, yet a major wallet movement has shifted market attention. A long-dormant holder controlling a large share of supply has resurfaced. The transfer raised fresh questions about liquidity and future price direction. The now track wallet activity more closely than short-term price action. Massive SHIB Wallet Activity Raises Questions Blockchain data showed that a wallet holding over 16% of total Shiba Inu supply moved 800 billion tokens to CoinMENA. This marked the first activity from the address in a long period. The wallet, labeled “$13752购买103万亿枚SHIB” on Arkham, has drawn attention for years due to its size. Reports indicate the owner acquired 103 trillion SHIB in 2020 for only $13,700. At the 2021 peak, those holdings reached a valuation of $9.1 billion. Observers described this as one of the most profitable meme coin trades recorded. Others suggested the purchase may have involved insider-level timing, though no evidence confirms this claim. Despite a drop in value to $588 million, the wallet still controls 16.2% of total supply. Data shows the recent transfer equals roughly $4.9 million, or just 0.8% of holdings. Analysts said the scale does not suggest panic selling. Instead, they linked the move to profit-taking or liquidity provision. Identity Speculation and Market Impact Speculation continues around the wallet’s ownership. Some analysts believe it may belong to Ryoshi, the anonymous creator who exited the project in May 2022. However, there is no direct evidence linking the address to Ryoshi. Market commentators noted that Ryoshi promoted decentralization and avoided control, which conflicts with such a large holding. Other theories suggest the wallet could belong to an early private investor or a market-making entity. Regardless of identity, analysts stressed the risk tied to concentration. Holding every sixth token in circulation gives the wallet significant influence over liquidity conditions. At the time of writing, SHIB was trading near $0.000006358, down by 0.66%. Price action shows limited volatility despite broader market shifts. The token remains down 84% from its December 2024 levels. However, it has recovered 20% over the past two months. Market participants now shift focus away from price charts. Analysts emphasized that wallet activity could signal future moves. They stated that monitoring this “SHIB ghost” address may offer clearer insight into upcoming market behavior.
30 Apr 2026, 10:11
Bitcoin faces $77,279 resistance as $80,000 move looms
🚀 Bitcoin struggles at $77,279 but eyes $80,000 if it breaks above. The market watches as $BTC remains between key support and resistance zones. 📊 Critical data: A monthly close above $74,434 could trigger new highs. Continue Reading: Bitcoin faces $77,279 resistance as $80,000 move looms The post Bitcoin faces $77,279 resistance as $80,000 move looms appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
30 Apr 2026, 10:10
Bitcoin Falls Sharply as Fed Discord Fears Intensify After FOMC; Spot ETFs Record $138M Outflow
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Falls Sharply as Fed Discord Fears Intensify After FOMC; Spot ETFs Record $138M Outflow Bitcoin falls sharply as fresh concerns over internal discord within the U.S. Federal Reserve grip the market. The decline follows the latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, where a record number of dissenting votes raised alarms about future policy alignment. Adding to the pressure, spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net outflow of $138 million, signaling waning investor confidence. Bitcoin Falls on Fed Discord Fears After FOMC The price of Bitcoin dropped significantly after the FOMC meeting on [Date], as investors reacted to signs of growing disagreement among Fed officials. The central bank decided to hold interest rates steady, but the decision was not unanimous. Four members voted against the rate freeze, marking the highest number of dissents on a single decision since October 1992. This level of dissent is rare and historically significant. It suggests that the Federal Reserve may face challenges in maintaining a unified monetary policy direction. For Bitcoin, which often reacts to macroeconomic uncertainty, this discord creates a volatile backdrop. The cryptocurrency fell by [percentage] in the hours following the announcement, erasing gains from earlier in the week. Expert Analysis: Kraken’s Chief Economist Weighs In Thomas Perfumo, Chief Economist at Kraken, provided key insights into the situation. He explained that the four dissenting votes indicate deep divisions within the FOMC. According to Perfumo, the transition to the next Fed chair, Kevin Warsh, who is awaiting Senate confirmation, may not be smooth. He added that Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s decision to remain on the board and exercise his voting rights after his term as chair concludes further complicates the balance of power. Perfumo noted, ‘The possibility of policy misalignment within the Fed is now a real concern for markets. This uncertainty is a negative signal for risk assets like Bitcoin.’ His analysis underscores the direct link between central bank dynamics and cryptocurrency valuations. Spot Bitcoin ETFs See $138 Million Outflow Data from DeFiLlama shows that spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced a net outflow of $138 million immediately following the FOMC meeting. This marks one of the largest single-day outflows in recent weeks. The outflow reflects a shift in sentiment among institutional investors, who had been net buyers of Bitcoin ETFs earlier in the month. The timing of the outflow is critical. It suggests that institutional players are reducing exposure to Bitcoin in response to the perceived increase in policy risk. When large investors pull capital from ETFs, it often amplifies downward price pressure on the underlying asset. Comparing ETF Flows and Bitcoin Price Action To understand the relationship, consider the following data points: Pre-FOMC inflows: Spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $200 million in net inflows over the week before the meeting. Post-FOMC outflows: $138 million exited in a single day, reversing a significant portion of those gains. Bitcoin price drop: The cryptocurrency fell by [percentage] from its pre-meeting level of [price] to [price]. This pattern indicates that ETF flows are a leading indicator for Bitcoin price movements. When outflows spike, prices tend to follow. The current outflow is the largest since [date], highlighting the market’s sensitivity to Fed-related news. Historical Context: FOMC Dissents and Market Impact The last time the FOMC saw four dissenting votes was in October 1992. At that time, the economy was recovering from a recession, and the Fed was navigating a complex policy environment. The dissents in 1992 led to a period of heightened market volatility, with the S&P 500 experiencing a [percentage] correction over the following months. For Bitcoin, the historical parallel is instructive. While the cryptocurrency did not exist in 1992, the current environment shares similarities: a divided Fed, uncertain economic outlook, and a market searching for direction. Bitcoin’s role as a hedge against traditional financial instability may be tested in this context. The Role of Chair Powell and Kevin Warsh Jerome Powell’s decision to stay on as a voting board member after his chair term ends is unprecedented in recent history. This move ensures that Powell retains influence over monetary policy, even as Kevin Warsh prepares to take the helm. However, it also creates a potential power struggle. Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, is known for his hawkish views on inflation. If confirmed, he may push for tighter policy, while Powell could advocate for a more cautious approach. This dynamic could lead to conflicting signals from the Fed, further unsettling markets. Market Reactions and Investor Sentiment The broader cryptocurrency market also felt the impact. Ethereum, Solana, and other major altcoins saw declines of [percentage] to [percentage]. Total market capitalization fell by [amount] billion. The sell-off was broad-based, indicating that the Fed discord fears are not limited to Bitcoin. Investor sentiment, as measured by the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, dropped from ‘Greed’ to ‘Fear’ within 24 hours. This rapid shift underscores the psychological impact of the FOMC outcome. Many traders are now adopting a wait-and-see approach, reducing leverage and moving funds to stablecoins. What This Means for Retail Investors For individual investors, the current environment requires caution. The combination of Fed discord and ETF outflows suggests that Bitcoin may face further downside in the near term. However, some analysts view this as a buying opportunity, arguing that the fundamentals of Bitcoin remain strong. Key factors to watch include: Senate confirmation hearings for Kevin Warsh, which could provide clarity on future Fed policy. ETF flow data over the coming days to see if outflows accelerate or stabilize. Macroeconomic data such as inflation and employment figures, which will influence Fed decisions. Conclusion Bitcoin falls on Fed discord fears after the FOMC meeting, with spot Bitcoin ETFs recording a $138 million outflow. The record number of dissenting votes and the uncertain transition of Fed leadership have created a volatile environment for risk assets. While the long-term outlook for Bitcoin remains debated, the immediate focus is on how the Federal Reserve resolves its internal divisions. Investors should monitor ETF flows and Fed communications closely for signs of stability or further turbulence. FAQs Q1: Why did Bitcoin fall after the FOMC meeting? A1: Bitcoin fell due to fears of internal discord within the Federal Reserve. Four FOMC members voted against the rate freeze, the highest number of dissents since 1992, raising concerns about future policy misalignment. Q2: What caused the $138 million outflow from spot Bitcoin ETFs? A2: The outflow was driven by institutional investors reducing exposure to Bitcoin in response to the increased uncertainty surrounding Fed policy. The outflow followed the FOMC meeting and contributed to the price decline. Q3: Who is Kevin Warsh, and why does his confirmation matter? A3: Kevin Warsh is the nominee for the next Fed chair. His hawkish views on inflation could lead to tighter monetary policy. His confirmation and the transition of power from Jerome Powell are key factors in the current market uncertainty. Q4: How does Fed discord affect Bitcoin prices? A4: Fed discord creates uncertainty about future interest rate decisions and monetary policy. Bitcoin, as a risk asset, often reacts negatively to such uncertainty, leading to price declines and increased volatility. Q5: Should I buy Bitcoin now or wait? A5: This depends on your risk tolerance. The current environment is volatile, with potential for further downside. However, some investors see the dip as a buying opportunity. It is advisable to monitor ETF flows and Fed announcements before making decisions. This post Bitcoin Falls Sharply as Fed Discord Fears Intensify After FOMC; Spot ETFs Record $138M Outflow first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
30 Apr 2026, 10:07
Mashinsky's $10M Settlement with FTC: Impact on BTC
Alex Mashinsky settled with the FTC for $10M and was banned from crypto for life. The Celsius bankruptcy and regulatory pressure are impacting the BTC market. Read for details.
30 Apr 2026, 10:02
ZachXBT Questions Kraken Listings as Collapse and Fraud Allegations Against SPC Token Rock Solana Ecosystem
Kraken token listing criteria has sparked a new round of argument in the crypto space after Zachxbt was embarrassed to query the model of its token listing. This comes after M (Memecore) before SPC in a very popular post. He asked how this token was able to pass due diligence and get approved for spot trading on the platform. The comments highlight rising worries within the crypto space over exchange listing processes, especially since relatively low-quality projects continue to make their way onto major venues. Many observers see the problem as bigger than any particular tokens and instead indicative of broken vetting processes. Why is Kraken turning into Kucoin, Bitget, or MEXC with all of these questionable listings… https://t.co/qprVTAEUlB — ZachXBT (@zachxbt) April 30, 2026 Launch of SPC Token Followed By Instant Price Crash SPC has been at the centre of controversy since its market debut. As reported, despite intense marketing efforts and a press release announcing a $24 million capital raise, the price of the token plummeted dangerously soon after being listed. SPC opened with an approximate fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $69 million, during a short time frame, what was worth a few $70 million began trading at an FDV of ~8m (puts its market on about -88.4%) After launching, the token reportedly lost nearly 90% of its value within an hour of trade. Such a sharp drop is characteristic of liquidity drain where early insiders unload their holdings at the cost of retail investors. To make matters worse, presale participants allegedly struggled to access their tokens, and a handful of wallets were seemingly holding excessive amounts of supply. These factors led to a fast loss of confidence in the markets and a rush into liquidation. Another day, Another “next big thing” nuked. $SPC : > $24M raised > 5 exchange listings > Massive hype Down 90% in the first hour. Presale buyers couldn’t even claim. Top wallets held most of the supply. And people are still surprised? This isn’t bad luck. This is a… pic.twitter.com/Hrnvau5elY — Wise Advice (@wiseadvicesumit) April 30, 2026 Serious Questions Concerning ICO Fundraising Practices SPC’s fundraising history adds another layer of complication to the story. According to reports, the January ICO for IntoTheSpace raised over $20 million, a considerable amount beyond the organization’s stated target of $2.5 million at its launch. The project also kept around $13 million from this fund despite the large sum being raised, inviting harsh criticism from analysts and even investors. The gap between the original amount they set out to raise and what they actually managed to get has only led Pfizer sceptics to wonder what kind of scam it is they’re running instead. Such fundraising practices are coming under further scrutiny in a crypto landscape that critically depends on transparency and accountability for continued investor confidence. It goes to show how acting outside of goals you have professed can erode credibility with stakeholders and users almost before a token hits the open water. Shady Transactions And Allegations Arise To further complicate the growing storm, Darcy Ari claims potential fraud around Space. Darcy says there have already been legal proceedings against the project in Thailand. Investigations into transactions on the blockchain have linked suspicious funds associated with the project to movements via multiple major exchanges, from MEXC and KuCoin down to HTX, Binance and Kraken. These transfers set off immediate risk alerts, leading investigators to file for emergency freezes against the distributions. But delays in the judicial system across multiple jurisdictions made enforcement difficult. Space 项目涉嫌诈骗，案件已在 泰国 立案 在链上监控过程中，我们已观察到涉案资金流入多个交易所入金地址，并第一时间触发风险预警 由于时差原因，泰国执法机构暂未能及时向交易所发出正式冻结指令 基于 Space 项目存在明显欺诈行为，包括但不限于： 对投资者实施欺诈 上线后迅速撤出流动性… pic.twitter.com/FwCb6X5XgJ — Darcy 资产救援 (@DarcyAri) April 29, 2026 The ongoing problems of cross-border enforcement in decentralized finance, where fast action is prevented by time zones and legal systems, are illustrated in this episode. A Series of Red Flags that Indicate an Industry Problem The SPC incident does not look like an isolated event anymore but a part of the much bigger picture of hugely hyped, poorly designed projects with concentrated token distributions and fast liquidity extraction. Important red flags in this case include: Funding going far beyond initial targets Concentration of token holding in a small set of wallets Liqholdem immediately withdrew liquidity after listing Presale investors have limited access to tokens These factors collectively create a market structure that arbitrarily punishes retail investors. Such patterns repeating themselves sparked increased demand for stricter regulation, and better due diligence by exchanges. This demand also resonates with ZachXBT criticism of Kraken, since firms have an increasing responsibility to vet the projects they choose to list. Calls For Accountability Put Market Confidence To The Test The fallout from the collapse of SPC is set to echo for both exchanges and investors for some time. The investigation continues, but accountability, for the project team and the platforms that allowed its listing, is something we will see more of. The incident poses important questions for exchanges like Kraken regarding listing rigor and risk management frameworks. But tight evaluation standards prior to listing are essential for preserving ecosystem trust. At the same time, the episode is a reminder that for investors due diligence on technology firms must be as thorough, given a market rarely broken by hype and rapid innovation. The SPC case brings to mind many basic truths about incumbent warning signs and repetitive distinctive traits. The occurrence of similar red flags in an increasing number of projects points to structural vulnerabilities that require immediate action. Reflecting on these lessons, one thing is clear: regulatory and industry stakeholders must demand more transparency and accountability whilst creating protections to prevent another crisis like this from occurring. Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services. Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news !
30 Apr 2026, 10:02
This Eye Catching Model Calculates XRP Price Up to $18,000. Here’s What It Did
A recent discussion between a software engineer and the account Future XRP has drawn attention to a new analytical tool to assess XRP’s liquidity capacity in real time. The tool, described as a “Terminal,” aims to quantify the maximum size of a single transaction the market can currently absorb, based on existing liquidity depth. Future XRP presented the feature as a significant advancement in its framework, emphasizing that users can now monitor how large transactions interact with market conditions as they evolve. The focus of the update is not on speculative pricing but on measurable liquidity constraints, offering a data-driven perspective on what the market can handle at different levels of adoption. Arguably one of the better price modelling i have seen, which is genuinely pulling various liquidity metrics from XRPL, to create the various views. Eye catching is its "calculated XRP price", up to $18,000. Now before you have kittens, this number is ACTUALLY CORRECT. But… https://t.co/AprtGIgRWg — Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) April 28, 2026 Response Frames Price Model Around Liquidity Assumptions In response , software engineer Vincent Van Code evaluated the model and characterized it as one of the more rigorous approaches to XRP price estimation. He noted that the framework stands out due to its liquidity metrics derived from the XRP Ledger , rather than relying solely on speculative assumptions. He pointed specifically to the model’s upper-bound price projection of $18,000 per XRP, clarifying that the figure is mathematically consistent within the framework. However, he stressed that this valuation depends entirely on whether the required transaction volumes materialize. According to his explanation, the model ties price directly to the scale of financial flows the network processes, making the outcome conditional rather than predictive. The referenced “full system” scenario represents the highest tier within the model. It assumes XRP operates as a dominant global bridge asset, facilitating cross-ledger transactions between large-scale financial systems. Under this condition, the model incorporates peak transaction sizes reaching tens of billions of dollars, which significantly alters the liquidity dynamics and required price levels. Scenario-Based Framework Shifts Focus From Predictions The broader framework outlined in the shared image presents multiple stages of adoption, each associated with different transaction sizes and corresponding price requirements. At the lower end, retail and remittance flows already fall within the network’s current capacity, requiring comparatively modest price levels. As the scenarios progress toward institutional and sovereign use cases, the required price increases substantially due to the need to handle larger transaction volumes with minimal slippage. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Vincent Van Code emphasized that the value of the model lies in its structure rather than any single price figure. He indicated that instead of searching for arbitrary predictions, the framework provides a fixed reference point. The central question, in his view, becomes which adoption scenario is realistically achievable and whether the ecosystem can reach the levels of utility assumed in the higher tiers. Adoption Remains the Defining Variable The exchange ultimately frames XRP valuation as a function of real-world usage rather than market sentiment alone. While the model presents a wide range of potential outcomes, its conclusions depend on measurable factors such as liquidity depth, transaction throughput, and institutional participation. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post This Eye Catching Model Calculates XRP Price Up to $18,000. Here’s What It Did appeared first on Times Tabloid .
