Invest ideasNews
11 Mar 2026, 19:05
Across Protocol Unveils Pivotal ACX Token-for-Equity Swap in Major US Corporate Conversion
BitcoinWorld Across Protocol Unveils Pivotal ACX Token-for-Equity Swap in Major US Corporate Conversion In a landmark move for decentralized governance, the blockchain interoperability protocol Across Protocol is contemplating a significant structural shift. The protocol is actively considering a plan to allow ACX token holders to swap their digital assets for traditional equity shares. This potential transition forms the core of a broader strategy to convert its Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) into a formal U.S. corporation named AcrossCo. Consequently, this proposal represents one of the most substantial DAO-to-corporation conversions in recent blockchain history, directly impacting token holder rights and the project’s future trajectory. Across Protocol’s Corporate Conversion Plan The reported plan, as detailed by The Block, outlines a clear two-path future for ACX token holders. Firstly, participants can elect to exchange their ACX tokens for direct shares in the newly formed U.S. corporation, AcrossCo. Alternatively, holders may opt for immediate liquidity by selling their tokens for USDC stablecoin through a structured buyout program. Importantly, the underlying Across Protocol’s operations are expected to continue without disruption throughout this potential transition. The new corporate entity, AcrossCo, would assume critical roles, including holding the project’s intellectual property (IP) and spearheading all future development, partnership initiatives, and commercialization efforts. This strategic pivot follows a substantial fundraising history. To date, Across has successfully secured a total of $51 million in venture funding. This capital underscores significant investor confidence and provides a financial foundation for the proposed corporate structure. The move from a DAO to a corporation reflects an evolving maturity within the blockchain sector, where projects increasingly seek hybrid models that blend decentralized principles with traditional corporate agility and legal clarity. The DAO to Corporation Transition Trend The contemplation by Across Protocol is not an isolated event. Instead, it fits within a broader, emerging trend where prominent DAOs explore more formalized legal structures. For instance, other blockchain entities have previously navigated similar paths to establish clearer regulatory standing, enhance operational efficiency, and facilitate institutional partnerships. The primary driver for this trend often involves navigating complex and uncertain regulatory environments, particularly in the United States. A corporate wrapper can provide several distinct advantages: Legal Clarity: Defines liability and establishes a clear legal person for contracts and disputes. Institutional Engagement: Creates a familiar entity for traditional businesses and investors to partner with or fund. Operational Focus: Can streamline decision-making processes for day-to-day development and business operations. However, this shift also raises fundamental questions about the preservation of decentralized ideals. The core promise of a DAO is community-led governance, where token holders vote on key decisions. A corporate structure, by its nature, centralizes certain authorities with a board of directors and executive team. Therefore, the Across proposal attempts to bridge this gap by offering equity, thereby maintaining a form of stakeholder ownership, albeit under a different legal framework. Analyzing the Token Holder’s Dilemma For an ACX token holder, the decision between equity and a buyout carries significant weight. Choosing equity converts a purely digital, utility, and governance asset into a traditional security, potentially offering different rights, such as dividends or different voting powers on corporate matters. Conversely, the USDC buyout provides immediate, certain value but forfeits any future upside tied to the success of AcrossCo. This choice fundamentally depends on each holder’s belief in the long-term value of the project under its new corporate leadership versus their desire for liquidity or aversion to traditional equity instruments. The valuation mechanism for this swap will be critically important. The plan must establish a fair exchange ratio between ACX tokens and shares in AcrossCo. This valuation will likely reference the project’s treasury, its $51 million funding history, current token market capitalization, and projected future earnings. A transparent and community-vetted valuation methodology will be essential for the proposal’s acceptance. Implications for Blockchain Interoperability Across Protocol operates in the vital sector of blockchain interoperability, enabling asset and data transfer between different networks like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Optimism. A corporate-driven development model could accelerate partnership formations with other enterprises and Layer 1 blockchains. Potentially, this could lead to more robust, commercially-focused development roadmaps. However, some community members may express concern that corporate priorities could diverge from the open-source, public-good ethos common in interoperability development. The success or failure of this conversion could set a precedent. Other interoperability projects and DAOs observing this process will gain valuable insights. They will learn about: Regulatory reception to such a conversion. Community response and participation rates in the swap. Operational performance of the new corporate entity. The blockchain industry continues to experiment with optimal organizational structures. The Across Protocol proposal represents a bold experiment in synthesizing decentralized community ownership with the formalized structure of a U.S. corporation. Conclusion The potential ACX token-for-equity swap by Across Protocol marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of decentralized organizations. This corporate conversion plan seeks to navigate the complex intersection of innovative blockchain governance and established corporate law. While the protocol’s technical operations aim to remain unchanged, the shift to AcrossCo would fundamentally alter its legal identity and stakeholder dynamics. The industry will closely watch this development, as its execution and outcome will provide critical data points on the future of DAO governance, token holder rights, and the maturation of the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. The final decision, resting with the ACX token holders, will determine the path forward for this major blockchain interoperability project. FAQs Q1: What is Across Protocol proposing? Across Protocol is considering a plan to convert its DAO structure into a U.S. corporation called AcrossCo. As part of this, ACX token holders would have the option to swap their tokens for shares in the new company or sell them for USDC stablecoin. Q2: Will the Across Protocol bridge service stop working? No. Reports indicate the protocol’s technical operations and bridge service are expected to continue without interruption throughout any potential transition. Q3: What happens to the ACX token if the plan proceeds? The ACX token would likely be phased out for holders who choose the swap or buyout. The new representation of value and governance would be shares in AcrossCo for those who elect that option. Q4: Why would a DAO want to become a corporation? Reasons can include seeking clearer legal and regulatory standing, enabling easier partnerships with traditional companies, streamlining decision-making for development, and potentially attracting a different class of investors. Q5: How much funding has Across Protocol raised? Across Protocol has raised a total of $51 million in venture funding to date, which provides a financial foundation for its operations and the proposed corporate entity. Q6: Who reported this news initially? The plan was first reported by the cryptocurrency news outlet The Block, based on information from sources familiar with the matter. This post Across Protocol Unveils Pivotal ACX Token-for-Equity Swap in Major US Corporate Conversion first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
11 Mar 2026, 19:04
Pump.fun enables cross-chain deposits through Moonpay to expand meme token liquidity
Pump.fun will accept tokens from other chains, adding extra liquidity to accounts in the trenches. The new deposits will be made through a partnership with Moonpay. Pump.fun traders will be able to fund their wallets with tokens from nine different chains. Deposits will be available through Moonpay, which has partnered with the meme token launchpad since November 2025. Moonpay will handle payments from Bitcoin and ETH, as well as L2 chains Base, Arbitrum, and Polygon. Deposits will be available from Hyperliquid, BNB Chain, and other networks. BREAKING: @Pumpfun traders can easily fund their account with tokens from 9 chains via @MoonPay : 🔵 Arbitrum 🟦 Base 🟠 Bitcoin 🟡 BSC 🔷 Ethereum 🟩 Hyperliquid 🟢 Plasma 🟪 Polygon 🟣 Solana Tap "Deposit" then “Cross Chain Deposit” in the @Pumpfun app to try it! pic.twitter.com/BCnNyzMKds — MoonPay 🟣 (@moonpay) March 11, 2026 With this move, Pump.fun grabs liquidity from other meme ecosystems, allowing holders to move seamlessly into Solana without trading or acquiring SOL. Until the addition of more crypto chains, Moonpay supported deposit methods like cards, bank transfers, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and other fiat fintech apps. Pump.fun expects to expand meme activity Pump.fun may expand its activity, while meme trading on other chains slows down or disappears. With this move, Pump.fun will become an even stronger competition to Four.meme, by directly tapping BNB tokens. The cross-chain deposits will be embedded into the Pump.fun app. The platform can harness both highly valuable assets like BTC and niche or less active tokens from other networks. The move comes as the altcoin market is still near all-time lows, seeking ways to be used productively. Pump.fun has tried to boost both token creation and graduations by optimizing its fee structure and returning some of the fees to the community. More tokens are graduating from Pump.fun Pump.fun gradiations climbed to an eight-month peak again. A total of over 400 tokens are graduating daily, or over 1.29% of all new launches, breaking a recent local high of 1.15% of all launches. Pump.fun had a peak level of graduating tokens, 1.29% out of around 28,000 new daily tokens. | Source: Dune Analytics For the first time in months, Pump.fun has produced tokens with a larger market cap. WAR now stands at over $30M, though still failing to break previous runs to over $100M. Pump.fun produces between 28K and 30K new tokens daily, with a graduation rate of 280 and up to 400 on peak days. The new fee structure encourages more graduations to Pump.swap, instead of leaving tokens in their bonding curve without liquidity. Pump.fun carries over $192M in locked liquidity, with over $1B in annualized fees and around $472M in net earnings. The Pump.fun team has already bought over 28.6% of the PUMP supply, increasing the pace of purchases since the start of 2026. Despite this, PUMP stayed in its usual range of $0.0019. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .
11 Mar 2026, 19:02
Stablecoins Aren’t Leaving Crypto — They’re Choosing Their Winners
The latest liquidity picture suggests digital dollars are still building inside crypto, but they are concentrating on the chains with the deepest trust, clearest utility, and strongest settlement gravity. For much of the last cycle, stablecoin growth was treated as a simple bullish cue. More digital dollars meant more buying power, more risk appetite, and, eventually, more upside for Bitcoin and the broader market. That reading still matters, but it is no longer enough. In 2026, the real signal is not just whether stablecoin liquidity is growing. It is where that liquidity is choosing to sit before it gets deployed. The current USD stablecoin category is roughly a $306 billion market, large enough that internal capital rotation now says as much about market structure as headline expansion does. The Real Signal Is Not Supply Alone A recent BitBullNews Stablecoin Flow Monitor made that distinction especially clear. Its core finding was not that capital left crypto. It did not. The more useful takeaway was that liquidity kept expanding overall while becoming more selective in distribution. Ethereum posted the largest absolute weekly gain in tracked stablecoin supply, Tron continued reinforcing its role as the market’s dominant USDT corridor, Base stood out as one of the strongest relative gainers, Solana held broadly steady, and Arbitrum recorded the clearest decline among the major chains covered in the report. That is not a market-wide retreat. It is a market choosing where it feels safest warehousing dollars. That distinction matters because stablecoins are not passive background assets anymore. They are the market’s dry powder, settlement layer, and increasingly its confidence gauge. When fresh supply builds broadly, that can be read as available fuel. But when it clusters unevenly, the more revealing question becomes what kind of risk the market is willing to take next. Concentrated flows usually say more than aggregate numbers do. Ethereum, Tron, And Base Are Telling Different Stories Ethereum’s latest growth reinforces its role as the balance-sheet layer of crypto. It remains the network most closely associated with deep collateral markets, large DeFi positions, institutional familiarity, and high-value settlement. When fresh stablecoin balances keep moving there, the message is usually less speculative than structural. Capital is not necessarily chasing the hottest beta first. It is often parking where liquidity depth and composability are strongest. Tron, by contrast, is winning a very different contest. It is not the chain institutions cite most often in polished tokenization presentations, but it remains one of the most important rails for moving digital dollars at scale. The BitBullNews monitor notes that Tron stayed firmly in second place in tracked stablecoin supply and continued to function as the market’s dominant USDT transport corridor. That matters because efficiency, distribution, and transactional utility still beat narrative elegance when real capital needs to move. Base is perhaps the most interesting middle case. Its growth looks less like an ideological shift and more like targeted migration into a cheaper, faster extension of the Ethereum orbit. In the March 2–8 snapshot, Base added more than $140 million in tracked stablecoin supply and remained overwhelmingly USDC-led. That suggests it is increasingly being used as a practical expansion zone for dollar liquidity that wants Ethereum adjacency without full Ethereum cost. Why This Matters For Bitcoin Before It Matters For Altcoins This is where many market participants still overread stablecoin growth. More on-chain dollars do not automatically mean altseason is around the corner. Sometimes they mean caution with optionality. Sometimes they mean liquidity is preparing for deployment but has not yet chosen risk. Sometimes they mean the market prefers rails over exposure. For Bitcoin, that distinction is important. BTC is usually the first major beneficiary when on-chain dollar capacity remains healthy because it is still the cleanest, deepest, most institutionally legible expression of crypto risk. If stablecoin liquidity is building while concentrating in the most trusted environments, that can support Bitcoin before it supports lower-quality or narrative-driven parts of the market. In that sense, chain-level stablecoin flow can act as a lead indicator for how selectively the next wave of capital may move. This is an inference, but it is the one the latest market structure most strongly supports. Issuer Quality Still Sets The Ceiling There is also a second layer to this story: not all digital dollars carry the same trust profile. Circle says USDC is always redeemable 1:1 for dollars, backed by highly liquid cash and cash-equivalent assets, with reserve composition disclosed publicly. On March 6, 2026, Circle showed USDC reserves composition on its transparency page and described the majority of reserves as being held in the Circle Reserve Fund , an SEC-registered government money market fund. That does not reduce the centrality of Tether, which remains the largest stablecoin and one of the deepest pools of crypto-native dollar liquidity. But it does explain why the market often uses USDT and USDC differently. In a stablecoin system still overwhelmingly dominated by those two issuers, disclosure quality, redemption confidence, and distribution power are not side issues. They are market-structure variables. Final Take The key question now is no longer whether stablecoins are growing. They are. The more important question is where that growth is settling, and what kind of behavior that usually precedes. Right now, the answer looks selective rather than euphoric. Digital dollars are staying inside crypto, but they are becoming more deliberate about which chains deserve them first. That is a constructive signal for the market, but not an indiscriminate one. And for Bitcoin, that may be exactly the kind of setup that matters most: liquidity is present, trust is concentrated, and capital still appears to prefer quality before it prefers chaos.
11 Mar 2026, 19:01
Bitcoin Rallies Past $71,000 as Crypto Markets Eye Geopolitical and Inflation Drivers
Bitcoin rallied above $71,000 but stalled below the important $75,000 resistance mark. HYPE Coin nears breakout levels while showing relative strength amid tepid altcoin action. Continue Reading: Bitcoin Rallies Past $71,000 as Crypto Markets Eye Geopolitical and Inflation Drivers The post Bitcoin Rallies Past $71,000 as Crypto Markets Eye Geopolitical and Inflation Drivers appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
11 Mar 2026, 19:00
Flow Network surges 38% after relisting – Move to $0.31 possible IF…
FLOW rallies for two consecutive days as major exchanges relist the token.
11 Mar 2026, 19:00
ICYMI: Ethereum Co-Founder Has Been Moving ETH To Exchanges, Here’s How Much
On-chain data has identified a massive ETH transfer linked to Ethereum co-founder Jeffrey Wilcke, raising immediate concerns about potential insider selling pressure on the already fragile market. Blockchain analytics platform Arkham Intelligence flagged the large-scale transaction, drawing widespread attention across the crypto community. Ethereum Co-Founder Moves $158 Million In ETH To Kraken On March 7, roughly 79,358 ETH, valued at $158.9 million at the time, was moved from a cluster of wallets linked to Wilcke to Kraken, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges. The transaction was routed through three separate source wallets, 0x16Cb7E, 0xe9c8, and 0xC90C8, before consolidating into a single intermediary address, 0x38a2C. After which, the intermediary wallet transferred the total amount to Kraken within a few hours. What makes this movement even more compelling is that these same wallet addresses had deposited 105,736 ETH, valued at approximately $262.07 million, to Kraken about 10 months ago, when the cryptocurrency was trading around $2,600. The multiple deposit transfers have fueled speculation that Wilcke may be repositioning or preparing to sell a significant portion of his holdings. Typically, large-scale deposits of this magnitude at exchanges are widely interpreted by market participants as a signal of possible selling activity ahead. Moreover, this pattern of deposit suggests a deliberate approach to offloading ETH holdings to prevent market volatility. Rather than making one large deposit, Wilcke appears to be spreading his transactions across multiple time periods. This strategy is common among whales looking to sell, as it helps reduce market impact and prevent sudden price drops . Despite the large transfer, the Ethereum price remains above $2,000 , down more than 6% in the past week. The transaction has also reduced Wilcke’s considerable holdings to 15,737 ETH, valued at approximately $31,832,190, according to Arkham Intelligence. ETH Insider Moves Compound Amid Fragile Market Wilcke’s latest ETH deposit lands against a backdrop of other high-profile Ethereum figures trimming their positions. Most notably, Vitalik Buterin, the founder of Ethereum , had earmarked and later sold over 16,384 ETH, worth more than $45 million at the time in February. Buterin had publicly stated that the proceeds from the sales would fund open-source software and hardware development focused on sectors such as finance, governance, and biotech. His transparency stands in stark contrast to the ambiguity surrounding Wilcke’s recent ETH transfers. Regardless of the underlying purpose behind each transaction, the combined weight of these high-profile insider sell-offs could place significant downward pressure on Ethereum’s price. ETH is currently struggling to hold the $2,000 psychological level, and such strong volatility from sell-offs could trigger further declines and shake investor confidence. Analysts have also projected more downside ahead for the cryptocurrency, especially if it breaks the $2,000 level.
