hodler

16 Apr 2026, 13:54

Charles Schwab Brings Spot Crypto Trading to Millions of US Brokerage Clients

Charles Schwab is rolling out direct bitcoin and ethereum trading to retail clients through a new offering called Schwab Crypto, priced at 75 basis points per trade. Key Takeaways: Charles Schwab launches Schwab Crypto with bitcoin and ethereum trading at 75 basis points per trade. Paxos, an OCC-regulated provider, handles sub-custody and execution for Schwab’s

16 Apr 2026, 13:52

SOL Battles Key $85 Zone While $150 Emerges as Major Bullish Trigger

Solana is approaching a decisive moment as price action tightens around a critical resistance zone. The asset now trades near $85, where short-term momentum and broader structure converge. Analysts highlight this level as a turning point that could define the next directional move. Micro Resistance Test Gains Attention According to moretradingonl, Solana is pressing into a well-defined micro resistance cluster between $85.0 and $86.5. This zone overlaps with a key pivot that often determines short-term trend direction. Price recently rebounded from around $81.65, forming a potential corrective structure. Hence, this move resembles a B-wave retracement pushing into resistance. If buyers reclaim this band, upside targets quickly emerge near $87.0 and $88.7. Additionally, a stronger continuation could drive price toward the $90 level. However, failure to break higher may lead to renewed selling pressure. In that case, support levels at $81.6 and $80.4 become immediate downside targets. A deeper retracement could extend toward the $78 to $75 range. Larger Structure Points to $150 Trigger DonWedge highlights a broader formation that strengthens the bullish outlook. Solana appears to build a macro base after a prolonged downtrend. Price continues to hold the $80 to $90 demand zone, reinforcing its importance. Moreover, an inverse head-and-shoulders pattern is gradually taking shape. The neckline sits near $150, which serves as a critical breakout level. If price breaks and holds above this level, momentum could accelerate rapidly. Source: X Consequently, the next major target stands near $239. However, losing the current support zone would invalidate this setup. Therefore, the $150 level remains the key trigger for long-term continuation. Long-Term Cycle Suggests Higher Targets Crypto Patel points to a repeating cycle structure that supports a bullish long-term outlook. Solana has moved through phases of decline, accumulation, and early expansion. Price reclaimed the $80 to $90 range, now acting as a strong pivot. Additionally, resistance levels appear near $110 and $170. A confirmed breakout above $270 could open the path toward much higher valuations. Significantly, previous corrections showed similar patterns before massive rallies. Patel suggests that hesitation at lower levels may lead to regret later. As momentum builds, long-term projections toward $500 or higher gain attention. As of press time, Solana trades at $85.40, with steady gains in both daily and weekly performance . This steady climb keeps the spotlight on whether bulls can deliver the next breakout.

16 Apr 2026, 13:45

Inflation Forecast: Fed’s Williams Warns of 2.75%-3% Target Surge Fueled by Energy Price Pressures

BitcoinWorld Inflation Forecast: Fed’s Williams Warns of 2.75%-3% Target Surge Fueled by Energy Price Pressures Federal Reserve Bank of New York President John Williams delivered a significant inflation projection this week, indicating consumer prices could reach 2.75% to 3% this year primarily due to persistent energy market pressures. This forecast, presented during a monetary policy conference in Washington D.C. on March 15, 2025, represents a notable upward revision from previous estimates and signals continued challenges for the central bank’s 2% inflation target. Williams’ analysis draws particular attention to global energy dynamics and their direct transmission into broader price indices. Analyzing the Federal Reserve’s Inflation Forecast Revision John Williams’ projection marks a substantial shift from earlier Federal Reserve communications. The central bank’s preferred inflation gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, has shown persistent elevation above target levels for several consecutive quarters. Williams specifically cited energy price volatility as the primary driver behind this revised outlook. Global crude oil markets have experienced sustained pressure throughout early 2025, with Brent crude maintaining an average above $85 per barrel. Furthermore, natural gas prices in European and Asian markets have remained elevated due to geopolitical tensions and supply constraints. Energy costs directly influence multiple sectors of the economy through transportation, production, and heating expenses. Consequently, these increases create secondary inflationary effects across consumer goods and services. The Federal Reserve monitors these developments closely because energy-driven inflation often proves more persistent than temporary supply shocks. Williams emphasized that while some price pressures may moderate, the current energy market fundamentals suggest sustained elevation through year-end. Energy Market Dynamics and Price Transmission Mechanisms Global energy markets face complex challenges that directly impact inflation trajectories. Several interconnected factors contribute to current price pressures. First, geopolitical tensions in key production regions have created supply uncertainties. Second, post-pandemic recovery patterns have increased industrial energy demand. Third, transitional energy policies have affected traditional fuel investments while renewable alternatives continue scaling. Fourth, weather-related disruptions have impacted both production and distribution networks. The transmission of energy prices into broader inflation occurs through multiple channels: Direct impact: Higher fuel costs immediately affect transportation and utility bills Production costs: Manufacturing and agricultural sectors face increased input expenses Transportation surcharges: Shipping and logistics companies pass fuel costs to consumers Expectations channel: Businesses and consumers adjust behavior based on anticipated price trends Recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows energy components contributing approximately 0.8 percentage points to overall inflation in the past quarter. This represents the highest energy contribution since the 2022 price spike period. Williams noted that while some moderation might occur, the baseline energy price level appears structurally higher than pre-pandemic averages. Monetary Policy Implications and Historical Context The Federal Reserve faces delicate policy decisions amid these inflationary pressures. Historical analysis reveals important context for current challenges. During the 1970s energy crises, the Fed initially underestimated persistent inflation, leading to more aggressive tightening later. Conversely, the 2014-2016 oil price collapse demonstrated how energy deflation could temporarily suppress broader price measures. Williams referenced both episodes while emphasizing that current circumstances differ significantly. Modern monetary policy operates within a more transparent framework with better-anchored inflation expectations. However, energy-driven inflation presents particular complications because monetary tools primarily address demand-side pressures, while energy shocks often originate from supply constraints. The Fed must therefore balance multiple objectives: controlling inflation, maintaining employment gains, and ensuring financial stability. Williams suggested the current policy path would remain data-dependent, with particular attention to whether energy inflation spreads to core services categories. Comparative Inflation Projections and Economic Impacts Williams’ forecast aligns with several private sector analyses while exceeding some official projections. The following table compares recent inflation estimates: Source 2025 Inflation Forecast Primary Driver Cited Federal Reserve (Williams) 2.75%-3.0% Energy Prices International Monetary Fund 2.6%-2.9% Commodity Markets Congressional Budget Office 2.4%-2.7% Service Sector Inflation Major Bank Consensus 2.5%-2.8% Wage-Price Dynamics These elevated projections carry significant economic implications. First, household purchasing power faces continued erosion, particularly affecting lower-income groups who spend higher proportions on energy and essentials. Second, business investment decisions may become more cautious amid uncertain cost environments. Third, financial markets must price in potentially higher interest rate paths. Fourth, government fiscal positions could deteriorate if inflation reduces real tax revenues while increasing indexed expenditures. Williams emphasized that the Fed’s response would remain measured and proportionate. He noted that premature policy easing could risk unanchoring inflation expectations, while excessive tightening might unnecessarily damage economic growth. The central bank continues monitoring multiple indicators beyond headline inflation, including employment trends, wage growth, and inflation expectations surveys. Global Energy Outlook and Alternative Scenarios International energy developments significantly influence domestic inflation trajectories. The International Energy Agency’s latest report highlights several critical factors. OPEC+ production decisions continue affecting global crude supplies. Additionally, renewable energy adoption progresses but faces infrastructure limitations. Meanwhile, geopolitical developments create ongoing uncertainty in key producing regions. These global dynamics create imported inflation that domestic policy cannot directly control. Williams outlined several potential scenarios for energy markets through 2025. In a baseline scenario, moderate price declines occur during the second half as seasonal demand eases and production adjusts. However, alternative scenarios include both upside and downside risks. Geopolitical escalation could drive prices significantly higher, while global economic slowdown might reduce demand pressures. The Fed must prepare for multiple possibilities while maintaining policy flexibility. Energy transition investments may eventually reduce price volatility, but near-term effects remain limited. Williams noted that while renewable capacity expands, traditional energy infrastructure still dominates global systems. Consequently, fossil fuel prices continue influencing overall energy costs during this transitional period. This reality underscores why energy markets remain central to inflation discussions despite long-term decarbonization trends. Conclusion Federal Reserve Bank of New York President John Williams’ inflation forecast of 2.75% to 3% for 2025 highlights persistent challenges in returning to the central bank’s 2% target. Energy price pressures represent the primary driver behind this elevated projection, with global market dynamics transmitting costs throughout the economy. The Federal Reserve faces complex policy decisions as it balances inflation control against other economic objectives. While some moderation may occur, current fundamentals suggest sustained price pressures through year-end. Continued monitoring of energy markets, inflation expectations, and broader economic indicators will guide monetary policy adjustments in coming months. FAQs Q1: What specific energy factors does John Williams cite for the inflation forecast? Williams points to global crude oil prices maintaining above $85 per barrel, elevated natural gas prices in international markets, geopolitical supply uncertainties, increased post-pandemic industrial demand, and weather-related distribution disruptions as key energy factors driving inflation. Q2: How does energy price inflation differ from other types of inflation? Energy-driven inflation often originates from supply constraints rather than demand pressures, making it less responsive to traditional monetary policy tools. It also transmits quickly through transportation and production costs, creating secondary effects across multiple economic sectors. Q3: What historical periods provide context for current energy inflation challenges? The 1970s energy crises demonstrated risks of underestimating persistent inflation, while the 2014-2016 oil collapse showed how energy deflation could temporarily suppress broader prices. Current circumstances differ due to better-anchored expectations but share some supply constraint characteristics. Q4: How might this inflation forecast affect Federal Reserve interest rate decisions? The forecast suggests the Fed may maintain higher rates for longer than previously anticipated. Policy will remain data-dependent, with particular attention to whether energy inflation spreads to core services categories that are more responsive to monetary policy. Q5: What are the main economic impacts of elevated inflation at 2.75%-3%? Key impacts include reduced household purchasing power (especially for lower-income groups), more cautious business investment decisions, financial market repricing of interest rate expectations, and potential deterioration in government fiscal positions due to reduced real tax revenues. This post Inflation Forecast: Fed’s Williams Warns of 2.75%-3% Target Surge Fueled by Energy Price Pressures first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

16 Apr 2026, 13:45

‘He Lost His Mind’—Trump, Musk And The $1.8M Polymarket Bet

Polymarket bettors have wagered $1.8 million across markets tracking the political fallout from the Trump-Musk split. Here is what the odds say about 2026.

16 Apr 2026, 13:42

XRP climbs above $1.41 after 200-day EMA breakout

🚀 XRP soared past $1.41 after breaking the 200-day EMA. This surge ended months of sideways action and low volatility. Continue Reading: XRP climbs above $1.41 after 200-day EMA breakout The post XRP climbs above $1.41 after 200-day EMA breakout appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

16 Apr 2026, 13:42

Ethereum Crypto Open Interest Just Hit $34 Billion in 24 Hours: Is a Breakout or a Liquidation Cascade Coming?

Ethereum (ETH) Crypto is trading above $2,300, and its futures market is heating up fast. Open interest across derivatives venues has surged 26%, with total ETH OI climbing to $ 34.165 billion after an 11.59% single-day jump, the kind of move that historically precedes either a decisive breakout or a sharp liquidation cascade. The question isn’t whether institutional money is back in ETH. It’s whether the on-chain fundamentals can keep pace with the leverage being piled on. Ethereum (ETH) 24h 7d 30d 1y All time Ethereum (ETH) Crypto Derivatives OI Hits $34B – Who’s Holding the Risk? Binance leads all venues with $7.416 billion in ETH open interest, followed by Gate at $4.36 billion, Bybit at $2.331 billion, and OKX at $1.943 billion. Those four exchanges concentrate the majority of leveraged exposure, and Binance plus OKX alone control 53.3% of the global derivatives market share, a venue concentration that amplifies cascade risk if either platform experiences a squeeze or outage. Source: Coinglass This isn’t the first time ETH OI has ballooned into the $30 billion range. An earlier buildup pushed totals to $30.451 billion, with Binance at $6.593 billion and Gate at $3.875 billion, a near-identical distribution to today’s setup. Analysts tracking prior episodes note that mid- to high-$20 billion OI levels consistently preceded 24-48 hour liquidation spikes when funding rates flipped. At $34 billion, the setup is more pronounced. The OI buildup creates what traders describe as a reflexive structure: rising prices pull in more leverage, which amplifies the move higher, but also primes sharper drawdowns if momentum stalls. Funding rates and liquidation cluster data above the $2,300 handle are the metrics to watch in real time. A 4-6% OI drop, consistent with prior deleveraging episodes, would represent roughly $1.4-2 billion in forced unwinds. Ethereum Price Prediction: Can ETH Clear $2,400 and Target $2,940? ETH price is forming a rounded bottom on the 12-hour chart after bouncing from a local low of $1,940 on March 29, with a 20% rebound to $2,330 fueled by improving macro conditions. The key technical level is $2,400, the neckline of the base structure. If bulls can close above it on meaningful volume, the measured move targets $2,940, representing roughly 32% upside from current levels. For a deeper look at the recent ETH rally and price structure , the setup has been building since the March flush. Support is anchored at $2,140, near the 20-day EMA, which acted as a retest zone during the recovery. Bears need a close back below that level to invalidate the rounded bottom thesis, if that breaks, $1,940 comes back into play. CryptoQuant data shows whale profitability has returned post-rebound, with large-holder optimism pointing toward a $3,000 psychological target. However, OI at $34 billion without a corresponding increase in network activity means leverage is outpacing fundamentals. If Ethereum’s on-chain transaction volume and fee generation don’t expand alongside the price recovery, the rally lacks structural support and becomes purely a derivatives-driven phenomenon, fragile by definition. Institutional ETF inflows into ETH remain a secondary catalyst worth monitoring as a confirmation signal. The post Ethereum Crypto Open Interest Just Hit $34 Billion in 24 Hours: Is a Breakout or a Liquidation Cascade Coming? appeared first on Cryptonews .