Invest ideasNews
16 Apr 2026, 12:20
Cryptocurrency Market Cap Plummets 20.4% to $2.4 Trillion in Q1 2026 – A Stark Reversal
BitcoinWorld Cryptocurrency Market Cap Plummets 20.4% to $2.4 Trillion in Q1 2026 – A Stark Reversal The global cryptocurrency market experienced a significant contraction during the first quarter of 2026, with total market capitalization falling by 20.4% to settle at $2.4 trillion according to comprehensive data from CoinGecko. This substantial decline represents one of the most pronounced quarterly pullbacks in recent years, reflecting broader financial market turbulence and shifting investor sentiment. The downturn coincided with notable weakness in traditional equity markets and a dramatic surge in crude oil prices, creating a complex macroeconomic backdrop for digital assets. Market analysts immediately began examining the underlying causes and potential implications of this sharp reversal. Cryptocurrency Market Cap Analysis: Q1 2026 Performance CoinGecko’s quarterly report, released in early April 2026, provides detailed insights into the cryptocurrency sector’s performance. The 20.4% decline in total market value followed a period of relative stability in late 2025. Consequently, this drop erased approximately $615 billion from the digital asset ecosystem within just three months. Market observers noted the correlation with traditional financial markets, particularly as the S&P 500 index experienced similar downward pressure during the same period. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve’s continued monetary policy adjustments contributed to risk-off sentiment across multiple asset classes. The report highlights several key factors influencing the market contraction. First, regulatory developments in major economies created uncertainty for institutional investors. Second, technological advancements in competing financial systems diverted some capital flows. Third, geopolitical tensions affected global risk appetite significantly. Market participants responded by reducing exposure to volatile assets, including cryptocurrencies. This behavior followed established patterns observed during previous market corrections. Bitcoin’s Performance and Market Correlation Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, declined by 22.0% during Q1 2026. This performance nearly matched the broader market’s downward trajectory. Historically, Bitcoin has demonstrated correlation with technology stocks, particularly during periods of macroeconomic stress. The simultaneous weakness in both cryptocurrency and equity markets during early 2026 reinforced this relationship. However, Bitcoin’s decline slightly exceeded the NASDAQ Composite’s drop of 18.7% during the same quarter. Several technical factors contributed to Bitcoin’s underperformance. The network’s hash rate experienced minor fluctuations, though security remained robust throughout the quarter. Additionally, on-chain metrics showed reduced activity from long-term holders, suggesting profit-taking behavior. Meanwhile, institutional investment products tracking Bitcoin saw net outflows totaling $4.2 billion according to separate data from digital asset management firms. This institutional movement reflected changing allocation strategies amid evolving market conditions. Stablecoin Dynamics and Exchange Performance The stablecoin sector demonstrated remarkable stability despite market volatility. Total market capitalization for stablecoins remained nearly unchanged at $309.9 billion. However, this apparent stability masked important underlying shifts. Notably, the supply of Tether (USDT) decreased for the first time since Q2 2022. This reduction amounted to approximately 3.2% of USDT’s circulating supply. Market analysts interpreted this contraction as evidence of reduced trading activity and potential capital rotation into traditional safe-haven assets. Centralized exchange (CEX) performance revealed significant challenges during the quarter. Spot trading volume on CEX platforms dropped by 39.1% to $2.7 trillion. March 2026 recorded a monthly low of just $800 billion in spot volume, representing the lowest monthly figure since late 2023. This dramatic reduction in trading activity reflected decreased retail participation and reduced institutional arbitrage opportunities. The volume decline affected revenue models for many exchange operators, potentially impacting their operational sustainability. Exchange Market Share Distribution Market share distribution among centralized exchanges showed consolidation trends. Only two platforms maintained double-digit market shares throughout Q1 2026: Binance: 37.0% market share MEXC: 10.0% market share South Korean exchange Upbit maintained consistent market presence with shares between 5% and 6%. This performance demonstrated regional resilience despite broader market declines. Other major exchanges, including Coinbase and Kraken, saw their combined market shares decline to approximately 42%, down from 48% in Q4 2025. The concentration of trading activity on fewer platforms raised questions about market liquidity distribution and systemic risk management. Decentralized Finance and Derivatives Market Evolution Decentralized exchange (DEX) activity followed different patterns than centralized platforms. Solana-based DEXs continued to lead with 30.6% of total spot trading volume. This dominance represented a significant increase from 24.8% in Q4 2025. Ethereum-based DEXs maintained approximately 28.3% market share, while Arbitrum-based platforms accounted for 15.7%. The resilience of DEX activity suggested continued developer and user commitment to decentralized trading infrastructure despite market conditions. The derivatives market exhibited unique characteristics during Q1 2026. Commodity perpetual futures accounted for approximately 30% of open interest on the Hyperliquid derivatives platform. This substantial allocation reflected increased demand for 24-hour crude oil trading amid escalating Middle East tensions. The war-driven volatility in energy markets created arbitrage opportunities that cryptocurrency derivatives platforms efficiently captured. Consequently, traditional commodity traders increasingly utilized crypto-native derivatives products for exposure management. Regulatory and Institutional Context Regulatory developments during early 2026 created additional market headwinds. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations entered their final implementation phase. Meanwhile, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission continued its enforcement actions against several cryptocurrency projects. These regulatory actions contributed to market uncertainty, particularly for altcoins with ambiguous regulatory status. Institutional investors responded by increasing due diligence requirements before allocating capital to digital assets. Traditional financial institutions maintained cautious but continued engagement with cryptocurrency markets. Several major banks expanded their blockchain-based settlement services despite market volatility. Additionally, asset managers continued developing cryptocurrency exchange-traded fund (ETF) products for international markets. These developments suggested long-term institutional commitment to digital asset infrastructure regardless of short-term price movements. The institutional perspective focused on technology adoption rather than speculative trading opportunities. Historical Context and Market Cycle Analysis The Q1 2026 decline represents the third-largest quarterly percentage drop since the 2022 cryptocurrency market downturn. Historical analysis reveals similar patterns following periods of excessive leverage and speculative activity. The current correction follows a 14-month period of generally upward price movement from late 2024 through 2025. Market cycle theorists note that such corrections typically last between 3-6 months before establishing new baselines for subsequent growth. Previous market cycles provide context for understanding current conditions. The 2018 bear market saw total cryptocurrency market capitalization decline approximately 80% from peak to trough. Similarly, the 2022 correction resulted in a 75% drawdown. By comparison, the Q1 2026 decline appears more moderate, suggesting potentially different underlying dynamics. However, direct comparisons require caution due to the market’s increased maturity and institutional participation since previous cycles. Technological and Fundamental Developments Despite price declines, fundamental blockchain development continued advancing throughout Q1 2026. Ethereum completed its next major protocol upgrade, improving transaction efficiency by approximately 18%. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s Lightning Network capacity increased by 34% despite market conditions. These technological improvements demonstrate the separation between short-term price action and long-term protocol development. Developer activity metrics remained strong across major blockchain ecosystems, suggesting continued innovation regardless of market sentiment. Network security metrics showed mixed results during the quarter. Bitcoin’s hash rate experienced minor declines but remained near all-time highs. Ethereum’s validator participation rate maintained consistency above 99%. However, several smaller proof-of-work networks saw security reductions as miners reallocated resources. These security dynamics reflect the economic realities of blockchain operation during market contractions. Network effects generally protected larger, more established protocols from significant security degradation. Conclusion The cryptocurrency market cap decline of 20.4% to $2.4 trillion in Q1 2026 represents a significant market correction within a broader context of financial market volatility. Bitcoin’s 22.0% decline mirrored traditional equity market weakness, while stablecoins demonstrated remarkable resilience. Exchange trading volumes contracted substantially, with only Binance and MEXC maintaining double-digit market shares. Meanwhile, decentralized exchanges on Solana continued gaining traction, and derivatives markets adapted to geopolitical events through commodity perpetual futures. This cryptocurrency market cap adjustment reflects complex interactions between macroeconomic factors, regulatory developments, and technological evolution. Market participants now watch for signs of stabilization and the potential emergence of new growth catalysts as the digital asset ecosystem continues maturing amid challenging conditions. FAQs Q1: What caused the 20.4% decline in cryptocurrency market cap during Q1 2026? The decline resulted from multiple factors including weakness in traditional stock markets, regulatory uncertainty in major economies, reduced retail trading activity, and broader risk-off sentiment among institutional investors amid geopolitical tensions and monetary policy adjustments. Q2: How did Bitcoin perform compared to the overall cryptocurrency market? Bitcoin declined by 22.0%, slightly underperforming the broader market’s 20.4% drop. This performance reflected Bitcoin’s continued correlation with technology stocks and its role as a benchmark for the entire digital asset sector. Q3: Why did stablecoin market cap remain nearly unchanged despite the market decline? Stablecoins maintained their value because they are pegged to traditional assets like the US dollar. Their stability during market volatility demonstrates their function as safe havens within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, though USDT supply decreased for the first time since 2022. Q4: Which cryptocurrency exchanges maintained market share during the trading volume decline? Only Binance (37.0%) and MEXC (10.0%) maintained double-digit market shares. South Korean exchange Upbit held between 5-6% market share, while other major exchanges saw combined shares decline to approximately 42%. Q5: What role did geopolitical events play in cryptocurrency derivatives markets? The war in the Middle East drove increased demand for 24-hour crude oil trading, leading commodity perpetual futures to account for approximately 30% of open interest on Hyperliquid. This demonstrated how cryptocurrency derivatives markets can provide exposure to traditional assets during geopolitical volatility. This post Cryptocurrency Market Cap Plummets 20.4% to $2.4 Trillion in Q1 2026 – A Stark Reversal first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
16 Apr 2026, 12:15
South Africa Rate Hikes Loom as Iran Conflict Sparks Critical Inflation Fears
BitcoinWorld South Africa Rate Hikes Loom as Iran Conflict Sparks Critical Inflation Fears JOHANNESBURG, South Africa – March 2025: Global banking giant Citi has issued a stark warning about potential interest rate increases in South Africa as escalating tensions in the Middle East continue to disrupt international energy markets. The bank’s analysis directly connects geopolitical instability with domestic economic pressures that may force the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) to implement tighter monetary policy. This development comes at a particularly challenging time for South African consumers already grappling with persistent inflation and economic uncertainty. South Africa Rate Hikes Become Increasingly Likely Citi’s economic research team has significantly revised its outlook for South African monetary policy following recent developments in the Persian Gulf. The bank now projects that the SARB may implement multiple rate increases throughout 2025, potentially adding 75 to 100 basis points to the current repo rate. This adjustment represents a substantial shift from previous forecasts that anticipated a more gradual approach to monetary tightening. The primary driver behind this revised outlook remains the ongoing conflict involving Iran and its impact on global energy supplies. South Africa imports approximately 60% of its crude oil requirements, making the nation particularly vulnerable to international price fluctuations. Recent disruptions to shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz have already triggered a 15% increase in Brent crude prices over the past month. Consequently, transportation costs and manufacturing expenses have risen correspondingly throughout the South African economy. These developments create significant inflationary pressures that monetary policymakers cannot ignore. Iran Conflict Impact on Global Energy Markets The geopolitical situation in the Middle East has entered a particularly volatile phase with direct implications for international trade. Iran’s recent military activities have disrupted approximately 20% of global oil shipments that typically transit through critical maritime chokepoints. This disruption has created supply chain uncertainties that extend far beyond immediate regional concerns. Energy analysts now project sustained price elevation throughout 2025, with potential spikes during periods of escalated military engagement. Global markets have responded with notable anxiety to these developments. The table below illustrates recent price movements in key commodities: Commodity Price Change (30 Days) Impact on South Africa Brent Crude Oil +15.2% Higher fuel and transport costs Diesel +18.7% Increased logistics expenses Natural Gas +12.4% Higher electricity generation costs Petrochemicals +9.8% Manufacturing input inflation These price increases transmit directly through South Africa’s economy via multiple channels. Transportation companies immediately face higher operational costs, which they typically pass to consumers through increased prices for goods and services. Manufacturing enterprises experience rising input costs that squeeze profit margins and potentially reduce production capacity. Furthermore, electricity generation becomes more expensive as Eskom incorporates higher fuel costs into its tariff structures. Monetary Policy Response Mechanisms The South African Reserve Bank maintains a primary mandate to protect price stability within the national economy. SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago has repeatedly emphasized the institution’s commitment to its inflation-targeting framework, which aims to keep consumer price increases within a 3-6% band. When external shocks threaten this target, the central bank possesses limited tools to counteract inflationary pressures. Interest rate adjustments represent the most direct mechanism available to monetary authorities. Higher interest rates theoretically work through several transmission channels to moderate inflation. First, they increase borrowing costs for consumers and businesses, thereby reducing aggregate demand within the economy. Second, they potentially strengthen the national currency by attracting foreign capital seeking higher returns. A stronger rand makes imported goods, including oil, relatively cheaper in local currency terms. However, this mechanism operates with significant time lags and may prove insufficient against supply-side shocks originating from geopolitical events. Economic Context and Historical Precedents South Africa’s current economic situation presents particular challenges for monetary policymakers. The nation continues to experience: Persistent structural unemployment exceeding 30% Constrained economic growth below population expansion rates Significant fiscal pressures with rising government debt levels Infrastructure deficiencies particularly in energy generation These domestic vulnerabilities amplify the impact of external shocks like oil price increases. Historical analysis reveals that previous episodes of Middle Eastern instability have consistently triggered monetary policy responses in South Africa. During the 2011-2012 period following Arab Spring disruptions, the SARB implemented 125 basis points of rate increases despite sluggish domestic growth. Similarly, tensions in the Persian Gulf during 2019 prompted cautious monetary tightening even as other central banks pursued accommodative policies. The current situation differs somewhat due to South Africa’s more fragile economic position. Government debt has increased substantially since previous episodes, limiting fiscal policy options. Electricity shortages have become more severe, reducing economic resilience. Additionally, global monetary conditions have tightened significantly with major central banks maintaining elevated interest rates to combat their own inflationary pressures. These factors collectively reduce the SARB’s policy flexibility compared to previous geopolitical crises. Global Financial Institution Perspectives Citi represents just one voice within a broader chorus of financial institutions revising their South African outlooks. Several other major banks and research organizations have published similar analyses in recent weeks. The International Monetary Fund’s latest regional assessment specifically highlighted energy price volatility as a primary risk factor for Southern African economies. Meanwhile, credit rating agencies continue to monitor how external shocks might affect already strained public finances. Investment analysts emphasize that monetary policy represents only one component of the required response. Structural reforms addressing energy security, transport efficiency, and industrial competitiveness would provide more durable protection against external shocks. However, these reforms typically require extended implementation timelines and face significant political hurdles. In the immediate term, interest rate adjustments remain the most readily available tool for economic stabilization. Potential Impacts on South African Stakeholders Should Citi’s predictions materialize, various economic actors would experience distinct consequences. Households with variable-rate mortgages would face immediately higher monthly payments, potentially reducing disposable income for other expenditures. Small and medium enterprises relying on credit for operations or expansion would encounter increased financing costs that might constrain growth ambitions. The government’s debt servicing expenses would rise, potentially crowding out other budgetary priorities. Conversely, savers and investors in interest-bearing instruments might benefit from improved returns. Pension funds and insurance companies could experience strengthened balance sheets through higher yields on fixed-income investments. The banking sector might see expanded net interest margins, though this potential benefit could be offset by increased credit risk as borrowers struggle with higher repayment obligations. Conclusion Citi’s prediction of South Africa rate hikes highlights the interconnected nature of modern global economics. Geopolitical events thousands of kilometers away now directly influence monetary policy decisions in Pretoria. The Iran conflict impact on energy markets creates inflationary pressures that the South African Reserve Bank must address through available policy tools. While interest rate increases present challenging trade-offs for domestic economic actors, they represent a necessary response to external shocks that threaten price stability. The coming months will reveal whether these predictions materialize and how effectively monetary policy can mitigate imported inflation while supporting broader economic objectives. FAQs Q1: Why would conflict in Iran affect South African interest rates? The conflict disrupts global oil supplies, increasing prices. South Africa imports most of its oil, so higher prices create inflation. The central bank may raise rates to control this inflation. Q2: How quickly might the South African Reserve Bank implement rate increases? Most analysts expect any changes to occur at scheduled Monetary Policy Committee meetings, which happen every two months. Emergency meetings remain possible if inflation accelerates unexpectedly. Q3: What other factors besides oil prices influence South Africa’s monetary policy? Domestic inflation, currency stability, economic growth rates, employment levels, and global financial conditions all significantly influence SARB decisions alongside energy prices. Q4: How do higher interest rates actually reduce inflation? Higher rates make borrowing more expensive, reducing spending and investment. This decreased demand can slow price increases. Higher rates may also strengthen the currency, making imports cheaper. Q5: What can consumers and businesses do to prepare for potential rate hikes? Review debt structures, consider fixing interest rates on loans where possible, build financial buffers, and assess how higher borrowing costs might affect budgets and business plans. This post South Africa Rate Hikes Loom as Iran Conflict Sparks Critical Inflation Fears first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
16 Apr 2026, 12:12
Dogecoin Price Prediction: Analyst Eyes $2.80 Target as 1.618 Fibonacci Level Comes Into Focus
Dogecoin, the leading meme coin, has been grinding between $0.09 and $0.10 for weeks. Yet at least one analyst argues the bearish surface reading misses a deeper structural story, one told entirely in Fibonacci numbers. Crypto analyst Javon Marks has mapped a Fibonacci-based framework across Dogecoin's full price history. His finding: every major Dogecoin bull cycle has extended to, and often beyond, the 1.618 Fibonacci level before topping out. The current cycle has not done so. That omission, according to Marks, is not a sign of failure. It is an unfinished story. A Pattern Repeated Across Two Cycles Dogecoin's 2017 rally closed slightly above the 1.618 Fibonacci extension. Four years later, the 2021 bull run went further, reaching the 2.272 Fibonacci extension from the 2019 bear market low. That move propelled Dogecoin to its current all-time high of $0.7316. The 2024–2026 cycle has tracked a different script. Dogecoin has yet to break above the 1.618 extension. If it does and the historical pattern holds, the projected target is $2.80, a gain of more than 2,600% from current prices. Marks wrote on X that in every alt season, Dogecoin has pushed to and above the 1.618 Fibonacci level, and with another alt season appearing imminent, the likelihood of repetition is higher. On-chain analytics platform Santiment has noted that social media mentions of altcoin season are at their lowest in at least two years, a signal that has historically preceded altcoin recoveries. The Altcoin Season Problem For any Fibonacci target to materialize, broader market conditions need to shift. Right now, they have not. Altcoin Season Index sits at approximately 32, firmly in Bitcoin season territory. Bitcoin dominance stands at 59.2%, meaning capital continues to concentrate in Bitcoin rather than rotate into altcoins. These are not conditions in which a 2,600% meme coin rally typically begins. At the time of writing, Dogecoin is trading at around $0.09607, up 3.13% in the last 24 hours.
16 Apr 2026, 12:11
BTC whales ramp up accumulation to highest level since 2013
BTC whales were extremely active in the past 30 days, adding 270,000 BTC to reserves. According to Bitfinex, this is the biggest whale buying spree since at least 2013. BTC may be undergoing silent whale accumulation, with 270,000 BTC added to whale wallets according to Bitfinex. Spot buying has remained strong in the past week, as whale accumulation boosted the recent rally. The trend of whale-sized BTC orders is still going strong, switching from retail orders at the end of 2025. In the past quarter, whales dominated the spot market and continued the strategic accumulation as BTC traded in a tight range. BTC whale orders were the main driver of the spot market in the past month. | Source: Cryptoquant Accumulation patterns show retail orders often happen during downward price moves, while whale accumulation waits for periods of sideways trading and relative stability. The recent shift to spot orders happens independently of the still weak futures markets. As a result of the buying, BTC exchange reserves fell to just 2.68M , a multi-year low. Recently, whole-coin BTC transfers to Binance remained even more rare. In the past 24 hours, 6,310 BTC were withdrawn from Binance, and over 13K BTC for the past 30 days. In the past week, the pace of BTC leaving exchanges accelerated near a historical peak, further revealing the accumulation trend. BTC whales and holders are facing diminishing pressure to sell While the BTC market was slower, there was no true capitulation in the past few months. Currently, holders of wallets up to seven years old are, on average, in the green. BTC traded above $75,000 with a continued recovery. At the same time, the average realized price reached $72,300 , translating into lower price pressure. Around 8.75M BTC in various wallets is held at a loss, but the metric is improving. The current BTC cycle also comes with fewer signs of capitulation, as holders seek other sources of liquidity and hold fast to any coins acquired. The current spot buying cycle coincides with a new wave of buying for Strategy , this time supported by STRC digital credit. Strategy has managed to absorb some of the available selling. As a result of recent whale buying, the BTC sell wall rose to $77,980 , with smaller sell walls at $75,500 and $76,000, signaling robust demand. BTC holders await a directional move Despite the ongoing price weakness, BTC holders were in no hurry to capitulate. BTC is more than 40% down from its peak valuation, but it has shown its ability to react to positive market news. The recent BTC exchange flows show whales slowed down their deposits in March and switched to withdrawals during the recent market recovery. Currently, there is still no panic buying or FOMO, but an ongoing strategic accumulation. Whale and shark wallets remain the most influential factors for BTC, and are closely watched for signs of BTC switching to a more bullish sentiment. Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank .
16 Apr 2026, 12:05
Analyst: I Will Take Massive Profit from XRP as I Did at $3.37 Once This Happens
XRP is tightening within a critical technical structure, and market participants are beginning to anticipate a decisive move. After months of corrective price action, the asset now shows signs of compression that often precede significant volatility. Traders are watching closely as momentum indicators and chart patterns begin to align, suggesting that XRP may be approaching a turning point. Crypto analyst JD has drawn attention to this developing setup, pointing to a combination of bullish signals on XRP’s weekly chart. His analysis focuses on structural and momentum-based indicators that could define the asset’s next major move, provided key conditions materialize. Falling Wedge Points to Imminent Breakout Potential JD highlights a long-term falling wedge pattern that has formed over an extended period. This structure typically signals a bullish reversal, as it reflects diminishing selling pressure while price continues to print lower highs and lower lows within converging trendlines. $XRP – Potential Bullish Divergence w/falling wedge leading to a potential BREAKOUT If falling wedge breaks w/volume, I expect "updated" GREEN BOX to hit which I am taking MASSIVE PROFITS like how I did at $3.37! If PINK BOX hits next, I'll load up heavily! RT for update!… pic.twitter.com/S0lRGkB75G — JD (@jaydee_757) April 15, 2026 XRP has respected this formation consistently, reinforcing its validity. As the wedge narrows, the likelihood of a breakout increases, especially as the price approaches the apex. This type of setup often leads to sharp directional moves once the market resolves the compression. Momentum Divergence Signals Weakening Bears In addition to the wedge pattern, JD identifies a potential bullish divergence on momentum indicators such as the MACD and other oscillators. This divergence occurs when price trends lower while momentum begins to rise, indicating that bearish strength is fading. On higher timeframes, this signal carries greater weight. It suggests that sellers may be losing control, creating conditions for a reversal if buyers step in with sufficient strength. Breakout Confirmation Will Depend on Volume JD emphasizes that a breakout alone will not suffice. He expects strong volume to accompany any move above the wedge resistance, as volume confirms market conviction. Without it, price risks produce a false breakout and revert to the prevailing trend. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 If XRP achieves a confirmed breakout, JD targets an “updated green box” zone as a profit-taking region. He references his previous exit near $3.37 to illustrate a disciplined approach rooted in reacting to market structure rather than speculation. Downside Risk Defines Accumulation Strategy JD also outlines a contingency plan in case the bullish scenario fails. If XRP breaks down instead of breaking out, he identifies a “pink box” support area where he intends to accumulate aggressively . This level represents a zone of perceived value, where price could stabilize before attempting another move higher. Market Outlook Remains Conditional XRP now sits at a technically significant inflection point. The convergence of a falling wedge and bullish divergence creates a strong case for a breakout, but confirmation remains essential. Until price decisively breaks the structure with volume, uncertainty will persist. For traders, this environment demands patience and precision, as the next move could set the tone for XRP’s broader market trajectory. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Analyst: I Will Take Massive Profit from XRP as I Did at $3.37 Once This Happens appeared first on Times Tabloid .
16 Apr 2026, 12:04
Morning Minute: Bitcoin Devs Propose New Quantum Solution
BIP-361 would freeze the Bitcoin most at risk of seizure from quantum exploits. But will the community go for it?
