Invest ideasNews
15 Apr 2026, 10:35
Bitcoin Whale’s Stunning $37M Move After 14-Year Dormancy Sparks Market Speculation
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Whale’s Stunning $37M Move After 14-Year Dormancy Sparks Market Speculation In a stunning development that has captured the cryptocurrency community’s attention, a Bitcoin whale address dormant for 14 years has suddenly moved $37 million worth of BTC, marking one of the longest periods of inactivity before significant movement in blockchain history. Bitcoin Whale Emerges From 14-Year Dormancy According to blockchain analytics data from ai_9684xtpa, the whale address transferred exactly 500 BTC to a new wallet on March 15, 2025. This transaction represents approximately $37.04 million at current market prices. Furthermore, the address continues to hold a substantial balance of 2,359 BTC, valued at roughly $174.7 million. The movement follows a four-month pause after previous activity, suggesting deliberate timing rather than random activation. Blockchain records indicate this address received its initial Bitcoin allocation in early 2011, during Bitcoin’s infancy when prices hovered below $1. Consequently, the current value represents an astronomical return on investment exceeding 37,000 times the original value. This timeline places the address holder among Bitcoin’s earliest adopters, potentially including miners, developers, or visionary investors from the cryptocurrency’s formative years. Historical Context of Dormant Bitcoin Movements Dormant Bitcoin movements consistently generate significant market interest for several compelling reasons. Firstly, they represent some of the oldest and most valuable holdings in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Secondly, their activation often precedes or coincides with major market movements. Thirdly, they provide insights into early adopter behavior and long-term holding patterns. Historically, similar movements have occurred with notable frequency: 2023: 1,000 BTC moved after 10.7 years dormancy 2022: 5,000 BTC transferred after 9.3 years 2021: Multiple 1,000+ BTC movements after 7-8 years The current 14-year dormancy period represents one of the longest recorded intervals between acquisition and significant movement. This duration exceeds the typical 7-10 year patterns observed in previous whale movements. Consequently, analysts pay particular attention to such extended dormancy periods. Market Impact and Analysis While 500 BTC represents a substantial sum, its market impact remains relatively contained within Bitcoin’s daily trading volume exceeding $20 billion. However, the psychological impact often outweighs the direct market effect. Large movements from early addresses can signal changing sentiment among long-term holders, potentially indicating profit-taking, estate planning, or portfolio rebalancing activities. Market analysts typically monitor several key indicators following such movements: Indicator Current Status Market Significance Transaction Size 500 BTC ($37M) Large but not market-moving Remaining Balance 2,359 BTC ($174.7M) Substantial continued holding Dormancy Period 14 years Extremely long-term holding Transaction Pattern Single transfer Possible consolidation move The transaction’s timing coincides with Bitcoin’s consolidation phase between $70,000 and $75,000, following its recent all-time high. This correlation suggests the movement might represent strategic positioning rather than emergency liquidation. Additionally, the whale chose to transfer funds rather than sell them on exchanges, indicating possible long-term planning rather than immediate exit. Technical Analysis of the Transaction From a technical perspective, the transaction reveals several interesting characteristics. The transfer utilized standard Bitcoin transaction protocols without advanced privacy features like CoinJoin or Taproot. This transparency allows blockchain analysts to track the movement easily while providing market participants with clear visibility into whale behavior. The transaction fee amounted to approximately 0.0001 BTC ($7.40), representing a minimal cost for transferring $37 million worth of assets. This efficiency demonstrates Bitcoin’s continued functionality as a value transfer network, even for substantial amounts. Moreover, the transaction confirmed within two blocks, highlighting the network’s current capacity and efficiency. Blockchain security experts note that accessing a 14-year-old wallet requires maintaining private key security across technological generations. The successful transaction indicates remarkable key preservation, whether through hardware wallets, paper backups, or sophisticated security protocols. This longevity provides valuable lessons for cryptocurrency storage best practices. Broader Implications for Cryptocurrency Markets The movement carries significance beyond immediate market reactions. Firstly, it demonstrates the viability of long-term cryptocurrency storage across technological cycles. Secondly, it highlights the substantial wealth creation possible through early adoption of transformative technologies. Thirdly, it underscores the importance of proper security practices for long-term asset preservation. Industry observers note several potential motivations for such movements: Estate planning: Transferring assets to heirs or trusts Security upgrades: Moving to more secure storage solutions Portfolio rebalancing: Adjusting cryptocurrency allocations Institutional preparation: Positioning for potential institutional products The cryptocurrency community generally views such movements as healthy market indicators. They demonstrate active management of long-term holdings rather than lost or abandoned assets. Furthermore, they provide transparency into whale behavior patterns that can inform broader market analysis. Conclusion The Bitcoin whale’s movement of $37 million after 14 years of dormancy represents a significant event in cryptocurrency history. It highlights the remarkable returns possible through early adoption while demonstrating the viability of long-term digital asset storage. The transaction’s characteristics suggest strategic planning rather than panic selling, potentially indicating continued confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term prospects. As the cryptocurrency market matures, such movements from early adopters will continue to provide valuable insights into market psychology, security practices, and long-term investment strategies. The Bitcoin whale’s activity serves as a reminder of cryptocurrency’s transformative potential and the importance of secure, long-term asset management in this evolving financial landscape. FAQs Q1: What exactly is a Bitcoin whale? A Bitcoin whale refers to an individual or entity holding substantial amounts of Bitcoin, typically enough to influence market prices through large transactions. While no official threshold exists, most analysts consider addresses holding 1,000 BTC or more as whale addresses. Q2: Why do dormant Bitcoin movements matter? Dormant Bitcoin movements matter because they represent some of the oldest and most valuable holdings. Their activation can signal changing sentiment among long-term holders, provide insights into early adopter behavior, and sometimes precede significant market movements. Q3: How common are 14-year dormant addresses? Extremely uncommon. Most dormant address movements occur after 7-10 years. A 14-year dormancy period places this address among the longest-held Bitcoin wallets ever to become active again, making it particularly noteworthy for historical and analytical purposes. Q4: Could this movement indicate selling pressure? Not necessarily. The whale transferred Bitcoin to another address rather than depositing to an exchange for sale. This pattern often indicates consolidation, security upgrades, or estate planning rather than immediate selling. The remaining 2,359 BTC balance suggests continued holding. Q5: What does this mean for average Bitcoin investors? For average investors, this movement demonstrates the importance of secure long-term storage and the potential returns from patient holding. It also provides transparency into whale behavior, helping inform market analysis without necessarily indicating immediate price impacts. This post Bitcoin Whale’s Stunning $37M Move After 14-Year Dormancy Sparks Market Speculation first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
15 Apr 2026, 10:32
Striking $1.6 billion traded in strc with 11.5% yield
💥 STRC saw $1.6 billion in trading volume in one day. Investors are drawn by the 11.5% annual dividend paired with Bitcoin gains. Continue Reading: Striking $1.6 billion traded in strc with 11.5% yield The post Striking $1.6 billion traded in strc with 11.5% yield appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
15 Apr 2026, 10:30
Altcoin boom finds its epicenter in South Korea
South Korea is still a major market for altcoins, supporting a small selection of assets with resilient liquidity. Despite the lack of a clear altcoin market, some assets remain appealing to South Korean investors. South Korea is the exception to the general outflow from altcoin markets. Recent research shows South Korean exchanges carry around 30% of global crypto trading volumes. According to Kaiko’s research, 85% of that activity is linked to altcoins , while BTC and ETH carry a much smaller weight. Korea accounts for 30% of global crypto trading volume, with altcoins representing 85% of this activity, Bitcoin just 9%, and Ethereum 6%. pic.twitter.com/64ND9lGCH4 — Kaiko (@KaikoData) April 15, 2026 The ratio is skewed from the usual dominance of BTC and blue-chip assets. On Coinbase, which caters to US-based traders, BTC and ETH pairs make up 70% of all volumes. Why is South Korea an altcoin hub? Over 85% of volumes in South Korea come from altcoins. At the same time, the share of altcoin trading on Binance is down to around 30%. South Korean listings are relatively conservative, and the exchanges carry altcoins from previous bull markets. The KRW pairs also mean the available liquidity is localized rather than global. Since the exchanges are not dependent on the inflow of altcoins, some altcoins benefit from local hype and the general high-risk retail investment culture. Weekly trading volumes on local exchanges are at around $2.66B, a relatively low baseline. South Korean exchange trading, including Upbit, Bithumb, and KuCoin, may also affect futures markets for selected assets. Overall, trading in Southeast Asia has shifted to a lower baseline. Japan’s market supplements a steady volume of $20-$30B weekly, while providing significant liquidity for BTC trading. Which altcoins benefit from trading in South Korea? One notable effect of South Korean exchanges is that trending coins also spark acceleration on derivative markets. For instance, Enjin Coin , a relatively old asset, was among the top 5 assets on Bithumb as of April 15. Over 20% of ENJ volumes are against the South Korean won, allowing the asset to achieve a strong trend. Coinciding with the Bithumb rally, where ENJ reached a new high for 2026, open interest also increased to a three-year high. Other altcoins with significant activity on South Korean markets include XRP and the recently trending ZAMA. In the case of ZAMA, open interest also spiked in accordance with the increased Bithumb and Upbit trading. However, for tokens trading on South Korean exchanges, futures still depended on Binance. Those assets may be watched by international traders, making use of strong directional moves to also benefit from the more easily available futures markets. South Korean markets are still isolated due to local banking regulations, and foreign traders have found a workaround through Binance or perpetual futures platforms. However, not all older altcoins are available as perpetual futures. The recent examples of altcoin activity show that not all assets were abandoned, as long as they could attract sufficient liquidity and gain a clearer direction. Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank .
15 Apr 2026, 10:30
Trump’s Calculated Escalation: Analyzing the Strategic Military Deployment Against Iran
BitcoinWorld Trump’s Calculated Escalation: Analyzing the Strategic Military Deployment Against Iran WASHINGTON, D.C., March 15, 2025 – The Trump administration has significantly intensified pressure on Tehran through a substantial new military deployment to the Middle East, marking a decisive escalation in the longstanding geopolitical confrontation between the United States and Iran. This strategic move represents the most substantial reinforcement of American military assets in the region since the height of tensions in 2020, fundamentally altering the security calculus across the Persian Gulf. Trump’s Military Deployment Against Iran: A Strategic Breakdown The Pentagon has confirmed the deployment of additional naval and aerial assets to the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) area of operations. Consequently, this reinforcement includes an aircraft carrier strike group, advanced fighter squadrons, and enhanced missile defense systems. Specifically, the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group has received orders to extend its presence in the Eastern Mediterranean, while B-52 Stratofortress bombers have forward-deployed to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. Military analysts immediately recognized the deployment’s dual nature. Primarily, it serves as a powerful deterrent against potential Iranian aggression toward regional allies. Simultaneously, it provides the operational flexibility to respond rapidly to emerging threats. The Department of Defense released an official statement emphasizing the deployment’s defensive posture, stating it aims to “ensure freedom of navigation and reassure partners.” Historical Context of US-Iran Military Posturing This latest deployment continues a pattern of cyclical escalation between Washington and Tehran. Previously, the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign, initiated after the 2018 withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), established a precedent for using military positioning as diplomatic leverage. Subsequently, the Biden administration pursued renewed negotiations while maintaining a substantial regional presence. Now, the current administration appears to be returning to a more overtly confrontational stance. The regional military balance presents a complex picture, as illustrated below: Military Asset Category US/Allied Presence (Pre-Deployment) Iranian Counter-Capabilities Naval Surface Combatants 15-20 vessels Fast attack craft, anti-ship missiles Land-Based Aircraft ~200 combat aircraft Air defense networks, drones Missile Defense Patriot, THAAD batteries Ballistic & cruise missile arsenal Regional Bases 6 major installations Domestic infrastructure only Geopolitical Implications Across the Middle East The reinforcement carries immediate consequences for regional stability. Neighboring Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, particularly Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, have historically welcomed visible American security guarantees. However, this deployment arrives amid their own diplomatic outreach to Tehran, creating potential policy contradictions. Meanwhile, Israel has consistently advocated for a firm stance against Iran’s nuclear ambitions and regional proxy networks. Conversely, the Iranian government has condemned the move as “provocative adventurism.” Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kanaani stated the deployment “will not enhance security but will instead increase regional instability.” Iranian military officials have correspondingly announced readiness exercises for their own forces, including naval drills in the Strait of Hormuz, through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil passes. Expert Analysis on Strategic Calculus Dr. Anahita Sharma, Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, provides critical context. “This isn’t merely about adding ships to a map,” she explains. “It’s a calibrated signal. The specific assets chosen—enhanced air defense and long-range strike capabilities—directly counter Iran’s primary asymmetric advantages: its missile arsenal and drone swarms. The administration is communicating that it can negate Iran’s preferred tools of escalation.” Furthermore, the timing intersects with stalled nuclear negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recently reported that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium continues to grow, reducing the theoretical “breakout” time needed to produce a nuclear weapon. The military deployment, therefore, may serve as coercive diplomacy, aiming to strengthen the US bargaining position should talks resume. Economic and Security Impacts on Global Energy Markets The Persian Gulf remains the world’s most critical energy corridor. Consequently, any sustained military buildup inherently affects global oil prices and shipping insurance premiums. Market analysts observed an immediate 3% increase in Brent crude futures following the deployment announcement. Major shipping firms are now reassessing risk premiums for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Key security concerns for commercial shipping include: Asymmetric Threats: Iran’s use of fast boats and naval mines against tankers. Missile Risk: The potential for longer-range strikes on offshore infrastructure. Cyber Operations: Disruption of port logistics and shipping databases. The US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, headquartered in Bahrain, has consequently increased combined patrols with regional partners. This coordinated presence aims to deter harassment and ensure the uninterrupted flow of commerce. Domestic and International Political Reactions Domestically, the deployment has received mixed reactions. Congressional leaders from the President’s party have largely endorsed the move as necessary for national security. Conversely, opposition lawmakers have raised concerns about mission creep and the absence of a new congressional authorization for the use of military force. Several have called for a detailed briefing on the deployment’s objectives and exit strategy. Internationally, European allies have expressed cautious concern. While supporting the principle of freedom of navigation, French and German officials have privately urged de-escalation, fearing the deployment could undermine diplomatic efforts. Meanwhile, Russia and China have jointly criticized the action at the United Nations Security Council, framing it as destabilizing unilateralism. The Human Dimension: Regional Perspectives Beyond high-level politics, the deployment affects populations across the region. In Gulf capitals, many citizens express relief at reinforced security guarantees. However, peace activists and civil society groups warn of the psychological impact of perpetual militarization. “Our children grow up seeing warships on the horizon,” notes Kuwaiti academic Dr. Faris Al-Jasim. “This normalization of a siege mentality has profound social costs.” In Iran, state media uses the deployment to bolster nationalist sentiment and justify military spending, despite severe economic challenges from ongoing sanctions. Conclusion The Trump administration’s escalated military deployment against Iran represents a pivotal moment in Middle Eastern security dynamics. This strategic decision reinforces deterrence, recalibrates diplomatic leverage, and directly responds to Iran’s advancing military capabilities. While intended to prevent conflict through demonstrated strength, the buildup inherently carries the risk of miscalculation or accidental escalation. The coming months will test whether this show of force can coerce diplomatic progress or merely solidify a dangerous new status quo of militarized confrontation. Ultimately, the long-term trajectory of US-Iran relations will depend not just on deployed assets, but on the political will for sustainable de-escalation and dialogue. FAQs Q1: What specific military units are involved in this new deployment? The deployment includes the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (CSG), a squadron of F-35A Lightning II fighters, additional Patriot and THAAD missile defense batteries, and enhanced intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets operating from bases in Qatar, the UAE, and Jordan. Q2: How does this deployment differ from previous US military buildups in the region? This deployment is notable for its focus on integrated air and missile defense, specifically tailored to counter Iran’s large arsenal of drones and precision missiles. It also represents a larger permanent increase in rotational forces, rather than a temporary crisis response. Q3: What is Iran’s most likely military response to this deployment? Most analysts expect Iran to avoid direct confrontation with US forces. Instead, Tehran will likely increase support to regional proxies, conduct calibrated naval exercises near US ships to test responses, and potentially accelerate missile and drone tests to demonstrate its own deterrent capabilities. Q4: How does this affect ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran? The deployment complicates diplomacy by introducing new military variables. It may be intended to strengthen the US negotiating position by showing resolve, but it could also harden Iranian opposition and provide hardliners in Tehran with arguments against making concessions. Q5: What are the legal authorities for this deployment? The administration cites the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and the president’s constitutional authority as commander-in-chief to protect US forces and interests. However, some legal scholars argue that a sustained offensive deployment against a specific state may require new congressional authorization. This post Trump’s Calculated Escalation: Analyzing the Strategic Military Deployment Against Iran first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
15 Apr 2026, 10:30
Obsidian Plugin Scam Targets Crypto Users with Malware
The malware is known as PHANTOMPULSE, and it uses blockchain-based infrastructure for resilient command and control. In a separate incident, Apple removed a fake Ledger Live app from its App Store after more than 50 users were scammed out of approximately $9.5 million. The app used a bait-and-switch tactic to trick users into revealing seed phrases. New Crypto Scam Uses Obsidian Crypto users are being urged to be very cautious after researchers uncovered a sophisticated new social engineering campaign that uses the popular note taking app Obsidian to deploy malware. According to a recent report by Elastic Security Labs, attackers are targeting people in the cryptocurrency and financial sectors through carefully orchestrated interactions on professional and messaging platforms. Execution chain diagram (Source: Elastic Security Labs) The campaign begins with scammers reaching out to potential victims on LinkedIn. They pose as representatives of a venture capital firm. These conversations are designed to look legitimate and often revolve around financial services, particularly cryptocurrency liquidity solutions. Once a level of trust is established, targets are directed to continue discussions on Telegram, where the attackers introduce the next phase of the scheme. Victims are then instructed to download and use Obsidian, which the attackers claim is part of their company’s internal system for accessing shared data. They are provided with login credentials to connect to a cloud hosted vault controlled by the attackers. This vault serves as the primary entry point for the attack. When the victim opens the vault in Obsidian, they are prompted to enable community plugin synchronization. This feature then allows third party plugins to be installed and run in the app. Obsidian menu to open a remote vault (Source: Elastic Security Labs) By enabling this feature, users unknowingly activate malicious plugins that execute code in the background. They deploy a previously undocumented remote access trojan known as PHANTOMPULSE. Once installed, the malware gives attackers extensive control over the victim’s device. It allows them to monitor activity, access sensitive data, and compromise cryptocurrency wallets. What makes this campaign especially concerning is its use of blockchain technology to maintain communication with infected devices. Instead of relying on traditional centralized servers, PHANTOMPULSE retrieves instructions through on-chain transaction data linked to specific wallets across multiple blockchain networks. This decentralized command and control approach ensures that the malware stays resilient and difficult to disrupt, even if parts of its infrastructure are taken offline. Because Obsidian’s plugin ecosystem is designed to allow flexibility and customization, attackers are able to exploit this functionality without even triggering common security alerts. Apple Removes Fake Ledger Wallet App Other apps are also being taken advantage of by cyber criminals. Apple recently confirmed that it removed a malicious app that impersonated the popular Ledger Live crypto wallet. This was done after a wave of scams that resulted in millions of dollars in losses for unsuspecting users. The fake app was distributed through the App Store, and managed to deceive more than 50 victims, who collectively lost approximately $9.5 million in digital assets. The fraudulent application was designed to closely mimic the legitimate Ledger Live interface. It managed to trick users into believing they were interacting with the official wallet software. Reviews warning that the Ledger Live app is fake (Source: Archive.ph ) According to Apple, the developer behind the app operates under the name “SAS Software Company,” and has since been removed from the App Store. The company revealed that the attackers employed a bait and switch tactic. This means that they initially presented the app as legitimate before later modifying its content to resemble Ledger’s official platform. Once installed, the fake app prompted users to enter their seed phrases, which are critical private keys used to access cryptocurrency wallets. By obtaining this information, attackers were able to gain full control over victims’ funds and transfer assets without the possibility of reversal. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT pointed out that a big portion of the stolen funds came from a small number of high value victims. One person reportedly lost more than $3 million in stablecoins, while others saw losses in assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Among the victims was American musician Garrett Dutton, who disclosed that he lost $420,000 worth of Bitcoin in the attack. Apple explained that bait and switch scams are not new to its platform, and revealed that it removed or rejected more than 17,000 apps in 2024 for engaging in similar deceptive practices.
15 Apr 2026, 10:22
A Bittensor Developer Dumped 37,000 TAO Crypto and Quit the Network: Is the Governance Crisis Just Getting Started?
Bittensor TAO crypto token is trading near $249 , down over 4.5% in 24 hours and nearly 68% off its all-time high of $767.68, after one of the most damaging governance crises in the project’s history. The question isn’t just whether the price recovers. It’s whether the trust does. Covenant AI’s abrupt exit from the network has exposed a fault line that technical analysis alone can’t price in. On April 11, Covenant AI publicly quit the Bittensor subnet, accusing co-founder Jacob Steeves of holding disproportionate control over governance. The announcement immediately triggered panic selling. Analyst Michaël van de Poppe identified the core accelerant: Covenant’s founder dumped 37,000 TAO into the market, igniting a cascade of liquidations that sent TAO down nearly 25% from $330 to a low of $265. Bittensor is rebuilding Stronger than before https://t.co/7i3h8lQWs0 pic.twitter.com/FqfhxpiCpg — Mars (@infinitetensor) April 14, 2026 The team has since responded with the Teutonic-I update and governance proposal BIT-0011, designed to prevent coordinated subnet exits from triggering similar sell-offs. Whether that’s enough to stabilize sentiment is the only chart that matters right now. Broader crypto market conditions add an additional layer of complexity to TAO’s recovery timeline. Can Bittensor (TAO) Crypto Price Recover Above $281 or Is Another Leg Down Coming? TAO is currently testing one of the most critical support zones in its recent history: the $250–$263 band. Technical structu r e is bearish , the daily MACD has posted a clear bearish crossover, the token has now rejected a multi-month descending trendline twice, and the most recent swing high ($390) printed a lower high after the $475 peak. Social mentions surged 340% and search interest spiked, a pattern that historically precedes sharp two-way moves rather than clean directional trends. TAO crypto right now is all about whether confidence comes back or keeps fading, because if governance stabilizes and that proposal passes, that is where sentiment flips fast, and price can reclaim $281, opening the door toward $330 and restoring the whole AI narrative around it. Source: Tradingview More realistically, though, trust takes time to rebuild, so price likely chops between $250 and $281 while buyers slowly absorb selling pressure and the market waits for clearer signals. The risk is that if things keep deteriorating, because if more subnets leave and governance keeps failing, that $250 level becomes fragile, and once it breaks on a higher timeframe close, the downside opens quickly toward the low $200s or even lower if panic kicks in. At a $2.55 billion market cap and ranked #38, TAO isn’t a project on the margins. But right now, price action is hostage to governance news, not technicals. LiquidChain Targets Early Mover Upside as Bittensor Tests Key Levels TAO’s governance crisis is a reminder that decentralized infrastructure is only as strong as its coordination layer, and that even projects with compelling AI narratives can crater on structural trust failures. For traders watching TAO bleed through support, the risk-reward calculus at current levels is genuinely uncertain. That’s prompting rotation into earlier-stage infrastructure plays where entry price still carries asymmetric upside. LiquidChain (LIQUID) is a Layer 3 infrastructure project currently in presale at $0.01449, having raised $673,819.16 to date. The core proposition: fuse Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment, what the project calls a Unified Liquidity Layer. Developers deploy once and access all three ecosystems simultaneously, with sub-second finality and verifiable settlement built into the architecture (a detail that matters more as cross-chain complexity becomes the dominant DeFi bottleneck). Institutional interest in cross-chain infrastructure is accelerating. Presale assets carry substantial risk, including illiquidity and the possibility of total loss, DYOR before committing capital. Visit LiquidChain Here The post A Bittensor Developer Dumped 37,000 TAO Crypto and Quit the Network: Is the Governance Crisis Just Getting Started? appeared first on Cryptonews .
