hodler

15 Apr 2026, 08:49

Here’s Why This Influencer Suggests XRP Could Surge toward $27,000

Crypto strategist and marketer John Squire has shared a striking claim in a recent post, stating that XRP could rise to $27,000 per token under specific conditions. In the post, he noted an influencer’s projection that ties the potential price surge to institutional adoption, large-scale liquidity flows, and a supply shock. According to the shared commentary, the scenario relies on increased institutional usage and a shift in how XRP is integrated into global financial systems. The post emphasized that such a valuation would place XRP in a significantly different category compared to its current market position. $XRP TO 27K An influencer suggests #XRP could surge toward $27,000, pointing to massive liquidity flows, institutional adoption and a potential supply shock. Big targets on the table. Eyes on XRP pic.twitter.com/uTLPyQcsuG — John Squire (@TheCryptoSquire) April 13, 2026 Fedwire and Federal Reserve Narrative The tweet included a video in which the influencer presented a detailed argument supporting the $27,000 valuation. In the video, she pointed to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s Fedwire payment system as a key factor. She encouraged viewers to search terms such as “Fedwire Payments XRP,” suggesting a possible connection between XRP and this high-value payment infrastructure. She claimed that the system processes transactions on an enormous scale, describing it as a “one quadrillion” dollar network. Based on her interpretation, if XRP is used within this system, the asset’s value could increase significantly. She further explained that her calculation assumes a velocity of 10, indicating how each unit of XRP would circulate within the system. While presenting these figures, she acknowledged that the outcome is not guaranteed and noted that her projection relies on assumptions about future adoption and integration. Calculation and Market Assumptions The influencer stated that her estimate was derived by dividing the total value of the payment system by a daily transactional metric, referencing a figure of $3.65 trillion. This approach formed the basis of her conclusion that XRP could reach a $27,000 valuation under the outlined scenario. She also suggested that institutional developments, including companies applying to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, could influence price movement earlier than expected. According to her remarks, a current price of around $2 would represent a significant discount if the long-term projection materializes. Despite the strong conviction expressed in parts of the video, she reiterated that uncertainty remains, particularly regarding whether the necessary regulatory approvals and system integrations would occur. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Security Warnings and Investor Guidance Beyond the price prediction, the influencer issued several warnings related to personal security and asset protection. She advised viewers not to disclose their XRP holdings publicly and cautioned against interacting with individuals who offer assistance with moving digital assets. She also stated that she operates only one account and does not provide direct support services, emphasizing the importance of avoiding impersonators. Additionally, she encouraged viewers to consider their investment plans in advance, especially if they anticipate significant price changes. Squire’s X post largely presented these claims without modification, drawing attention to the scale of the projection and the assumptions behind it. The discussion reflects ongoing interest in how institutional adoption narratives continue to shape expectations around XRP’s long-term valuation. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Here’s Why This Influencer Suggests XRP Could Surge toward $27,000 appeared first on Times Tabloid .

15 Apr 2026, 08:46

Pump.fun secures $5M funding for Pumpcade rollout

Pump.fun accelerated its Pumpcade arc after completing a $5m funding round. The PUMPCADE token reacted with a record rally, going vertical with a 100% gain in the past week. Pumpcade is Pump.fun’s bid on the prediction market, seeking new potential for liquidity and retail activity. Pumpcade is also reviving small-scale fundraising with its latest oversubscribed round for $5M. This time, the platform added support from Jump Crypto and Foundation Capital to expand its prediction market. We’re proud to announce that we have closed another oversubscribed funding round for $5M We’re bringing on @jump_ for their expertise in revolutionary decentralized technology and are excited to have @foundationcap double down on fast paced instantly resolved markets Pumpcade. pic.twitter.com/4bPWErU8NP — PUMPCADE (@pumpcade) April 14, 2026 As a result, the project is valued at $44M , based on a $1M pre-seed round and the latest seed round, also backed by Pump.fun and angel investor radiosolace. Jump Crypto is the first Tier 2 VC fund to support the new project. For now, Pumpcade has not performed a public presale or IDO, instead relying on the token hype to boost value. Following the latest token expansion, Pumpcade achieved a market cap of over $46M, with the potential to grow more with time. The relatively new token is just building up its mindshare , growing by over 1,000% in the past few days. Pumpcade aims to evolve prediction markets Pumpcade appeared just as other first movers showed peak volumes. The new platform has taken note of the development of prediction markets and aims to avoid the most notable pitfalls of manipulated markets. Pumpcade aims for fast market resolution, removing the friction of complicated predictions. For that reason, the platform will grow the list of markets more slowly, for now not allowing prediction pairs about mentions or other resolutions that may require complex arbitrage. In order for @pumpcade to instantly resolve markets we MUST have guardrails You can’t create a market on anything you want. We offer supported markets (that can grow infinitely over time) that you configure. No markets that are very easily manipulated, such as mentions. — Pop Punk (@PopPunkOnChain) April 11, 2026 The prediction market aims to create a more fun and distinctive app in comparison to the currently available platforms. For now, the actual app is in the testing stage, with open beta coming soon. The main goal for Pump.fun and Pumpcade is to transfer traders from ‘the trenches’ and make them use both platforms. Unlike Polymarket, Pumpcade will push toward fast resolutions, with 1-30 minutes for most prediction pairs. This fast pace mimics the meme token trenches and may prevent the inclusion of insiders or manipulating whales . To achieve those fast outcomes, Pumpcade will only allow pairs with verifiable data, which can resolve without conflict or unreliable oracle services. Pumpcade may also end up providing a reliable resolution engine for provable data, available through API. As a result, the platform may go beyond a prediction market and offer infrastructure to other prediction apps. Is PUMPCADE a reliable token? PUMPCADE is still mostly traded on PumpSwap and LBank, with no major listings or futures markets. The initial price discovery may be dependent on DEX liquidity, with the risk of early whales depressing the price. PUMPCADE started a vertical rally after the recent $5M seed round for the new prediction market. | Source: CoinGecko . Despite the attention for PUMPCADE, the earlier PUMP token remained near its all-time lows, sinking slightly to $0.0018. The new token sparks interest because of its rapid climb. The token is held by early whales, but has over 118K owners, a significant distribution for an asset that launched just months ago. PUMPCADE may get a boost based on the platform’s activity, especially if it does attract traders from the trenches. To date, Pump.fun has attempted retail distribution with appealing apps and easy access, becoming one of the most successful products on Solana. Your keys, your card. Spend without giving up custody and earn 8%+ yield on your balance with Ether.fi Cash.

15 Apr 2026, 08:45

Bitcoin Supply Shock Looms as Bitfinex Reveals Stunning 60% Dormancy Amid Fierce Institutional Accumulation

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Supply Shock Looms as Bitfinex Reveals Stunning 60% Dormancy Amid Fierce Institutional Accumulation New data from cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex reveals a startling trend that could reshape the Bitcoin market, with a full 60% of the total supply lying dormant for over a year as institutional investors aggressively accumulate. This significant reduction in active liquidity, reported in late 2025, points toward a potential supply shock that could have profound implications for price discovery and market stability. The exchange’s analysis identifies a specific cohort of one- to six-month holders, predominantly institutions, as the primary force absorbing available supply. Bitfinex Data Reveals Unprecedented Bitcoin Dormancy According to the official report from Bitfinex, the metric for Bitcoin activated from wallets has shown a steady decline since November 2025. This trend indicates a powerful shift in holder behavior. Historically, analysts track dormancy to gauge long-term conviction versus short-term trading activity. The current 60% figure represents one of the highest levels of long-term holding confidence recorded in Bitcoin’s history. Consequently, this mass inactivity directly reduces the liquid supply available on exchanges and in the open market. For context, blockchain analytics firms like Glassnode and Coin Metrics have historically provided similar metrics, often referred to as ‘HODL waves.’ The data from Bitfinex aligns with a broader, multi-year trend of increasing long-term holding, but the acceleration noted in 2025 is particularly pronounced. This environment creates a scenario where even modest increases in buy-side demand can exert disproportionate upward pressure on price due to the scarcity of readily available coins. Institutional Investors Drive the Current Accumulation Phase Bitfinex pinpointed the most active segment of the market as holders who have possessed their Bitcoin for between one and six months. This cohort now controls 22.1% of the total supply. Market researchers widely associate this specific holding period with strategic accumulation, often by institutional entities like corporate treasuries, hedge funds, and regulated exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Unlike short-term traders, these investors typically demonstrate a lower propensity to sell in response to minor price fluctuations. The Mechanics of a Potential Supply Shock The simultaneous occurrence of high dormancy and focused institutional buying compresses market liquidity. A supply shock occurs when demand rapidly outpaces the immediately sellable supply of an asset. With 60% of coins effectively off the market and a significant portion of the remaining liquid supply being absorbed by long-term-focused institutions, the ‘float’—coins actually available for trading—shrinks dramatically. This structural condition sets the stage for heightened volatility, especially to the upside, if new demand enters the market. The following table illustrates the typical breakdown of Bitcoin supply by holder cohort, with the current anomaly highlighted: Holder Cohort Typical % of Supply Primary Behavior >1 Year (Dormant) ~60% (Current High) Long-term storage, deep conviction 6-12 Months ~10% Transitionary, evaluating position 1-6 Months ~22.1% (Active Accumulation) Strategic buying, institutional entry ~8% Short-term trading, liquidity provision Historical Precedents and Market Cycle Context Analysts often observe similar patterns of rising dormancy and institutional accumulation in the late stages of a bear market or the early phases of a bull market. For instance, prior to the major bull runs of 2017 and 2021, metrics showed increasing amounts of supply moving into long-term holding wallets. The current data suggests a maturation of the market, where sophisticated capital is positioning itself based on long-term theses about Bitcoin’s value as a digital store of value or an inflation hedge, rather than short-term speculation. Furthermore, the regulatory clarity achieved in several major economies by 2025, including established ETF frameworks and clearer custody rules, has lowered the entry barrier for large institutions. This regulatory evolution provides a plausible explanation for the sustained accumulation by the one- to six-month cohort identified by Bitfinex. Their activity is less likely to be speculative and more likely to be strategic asset allocation. Implications for Retail Investors and Market Stability For retail investors, this market structure presents both opportunities and risks. The reduced liquid supply can lead to sharper price increases if demand surges. However, it can also lead to increased volatility and potential for rapid corrections if long-term holders decide to distribute their coins. Monitoring exchange outflow data and the spending behavior of the one- to six-month cohort becomes crucial for gauging market sentiment shifts. Market stability may face new tests. A market with a thin liquid supply can experience ‘illiquidity gaps,’ where the price must move significantly to find enough coins to fill large buy orders. This dynamic can exacerbate both rallies and sell-offs. Therefore, the Bitfinex report serves as a critical data point for all market participants, highlighting the underlying technical strength and potential fragility of the current Bitcoin market structure. Conclusion The report from Bitfinex underscores a critical inflection point for Bitcoin, marked by extreme supply dormancy and vigorous institutional accumulation. This combination is actively compressing market liquidity, making the potential for a significant supply shock more apparent than in previous cycles. While indicating strong long-term holder conviction, this environment also demands heightened awareness of volatility risks. The actions of the key one- to six-month holder cohort will be paramount in determining whether this tightened supply leads to a sustained price revaluation or a volatile redistribution event. FAQs Q1: What does ‘dormant Bitcoin supply’ mean? Dormant supply refers to Bitcoin that has not moved from its wallet address for a specified period, in this case, over one year. It indicates coins held with a long-term perspective, effectively removed from active trading circulation. Q2: Why are institutional investors accumulating Bitcoin now? Institutions are likely accumulating due to factors like increased regulatory clarity, the maturation of custodial services, Bitcoin’s perceived role as a hedge against inflation, and its growing acceptance as a legitimate asset class within diversified portfolios. Q3: What is a ‘supply shock’ in cryptocurrency markets? A supply shock occurs when the available liquid supply of an asset suddenly decreases or fails to meet rising demand, often leading to rapid and significant price increases. The current dormancy and accumulation are creating the preconditions for such an event. Q4: How does this data compare to previous Bitcoin market cycles? High dormancy levels have historically preceded major bull markets (e.g., 2017, 2021). The current 60% level is notably high, and the concurrent institutional accumulation is more pronounced than in earlier cycles, reflecting the market’s maturation. Q5: Should retail investors change their strategy based on this report? Retail investors should consider this data as a sign of strong underlying holder conviction but also as a warning of potential for increased volatility. Strategies should emphasize thorough research, risk management, and a focus on long-term fundamentals rather than short-term price movements. This post Bitcoin Supply Shock Looms as Bitfinex Reveals Stunning 60% Dormancy Amid Fierce Institutional Accumulation first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

15 Apr 2026, 08:35

USD Analysis: Deciphering the Critical Clash Between PPI and Consumer Sentiment Data

BitcoinWorld USD Analysis: Deciphering the Critical Clash Between PPI and Consumer Sentiment Data Financial markets received conflicting signals this week as key economic indicators presented a complex picture for the US Dollar, forcing analysts to weigh opposing data points in their forecasts. According to recent analysis from Danske Bank, the Producer Price Index (PPI) and consumer sentiment reports delivered mixed messages about the underlying strength of the US economy, creating uncertainty in currency markets. This divergence between wholesale inflation pressures and consumer confidence presents significant challenges for Federal Reserve policymakers and forex traders alike as they navigate the 2025 economic landscape. Understanding the PPI Data’s Impact on USD The Producer Price Index serves as a crucial leading indicator for inflationary trends within the US economy. Recent PPI data revealed unexpected movements that caught market participants off guard. Specifically, the index showed moderate increases in certain sectors while displaying stability in others. This mixed performance at the wholesale level suggests that inflationary pressures may be transitioning unevenly through the production pipeline. Manufacturing sectors demonstrated particular strength in the latest report. Conversely, service-oriented components showed more restrained growth patterns. This sectoral divergence creates complications for monetary policy decisions. The Federal Reserve monitors PPI data closely because wholesale price changes typically filter through to consumer prices within several months. Therefore, current PPI trends provide valuable insights into future Consumer Price Index movements. Historical analysis reveals that PPI data has maintained strong predictive power for USD performance. When wholesale prices accelerate significantly, markets typically anticipate more aggressive Federal Reserve action. This expectation generally strengthens the US Dollar against other major currencies. However, the current environment presents a more nuanced picture that requires careful interpretation by currency strategists. Danske Bank’s Technical Perspective Danske Bank’s research team emphasizes the importance of core PPI measurements. These measurements exclude volatile food and energy components to provide clearer inflationary signals. Their analysis indicates that core PPI trends have moderated from previous highs but remain above pre-pandemic averages. This persistence suggests that structural inflationary factors continue to influence production costs across multiple industries. Consumer Sentiment’s Contradictory Signals While PPI data suggested persistent inflationary pressures, recent consumer sentiment surveys told a different story. The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index, a widely watched gauge of American economic confidence, displayed unexpected weakness in its latest reading. This decline occurred despite generally positive labor market conditions and steady wage growth throughout 2025. Consumer sentiment influences USD valuation through multiple channels. Firstly, confident consumers typically drive stronger retail spending, which supports economic growth and currency strength. Secondly, sentiment affects inflation expectations, which directly impact Federal Reserve policy decisions. When consumers anticipate higher future inflation, they often accelerate purchases, creating self-fulfilling inflationary pressures. The current sentiment decline appears connected to several specific concerns. Survey respondents expressed particular anxiety about housing affordability and healthcare costs. Additionally, geopolitical uncertainties and election-year politics contributed to the cautious outlook. These sentiment factors create headwinds for USD appreciation despite otherwise supportive economic fundamentals. Key sentiment drivers identified in recent surveys include: Housing market accessibility and mortgage rates Persistent service sector inflation in healthcare and education Global economic stability concerns Domestic political uncertainty during election cycles The Federal Reserve’s Policy Dilemma Conflicting data between PPI and consumer sentiment creates significant challenges for Federal Reserve policymakers. The central bank must balance its dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment while considering financial market implications. Recent Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statements have acknowledged this data complexity, emphasizing a data-dependent approach to future rate decisions. Historically, the Federal Reserve has prioritized hard data like PPI and CPI over softer sentiment indicators when making policy decisions. However, sustained weakness in consumer confidence can eventually translate into reduced spending and economic slowing. This potential transmission mechanism forces the Fed to monitor sentiment trends alongside traditional inflation metrics. The current policy environment represents a delicate balancing act. Strong PPI data suggests maintaining restrictive monetary policies to combat inflation. Meanwhile, weakening consumer sentiment argues for more accommodative approaches to support economic activity. This tension creates uncertainty about the timing and magnitude of future Federal Reserve actions, directly impacting USD volatility. Comparative Analysis of Economic Indicators Indicator Current Trend USD Impact Federal Reserve Priority Producer Price Index (PPI) Moderately Positive Generally Supportive High Consumer Sentiment Declining Generally Negative Medium Employment Data Steady Growth Supportive High Retail Sales Moderate Growth Supportive Medium Market Implications and Trading Strategies Currency markets have responded to these mixed signals with increased volatility and directional uncertainty. The US Dollar Index (DXY), which measures USD strength against a basket of major currencies, has experienced wider trading ranges as market participants digest conflicting data points. Technical analysts note that key support and resistance levels have been tested more frequently in recent sessions. Danske Bank’s currency strategists recommend several approaches for navigating this environment. Firstly, they emphasize increased attention to relative economic performance between the United States and other major economies. Secondly, they suggest monitoring Federal Reserve communication more closely than usual, as subtle changes in language may signal policy shifts. Finally, they advise implementing more robust risk management protocols given the elevated uncertainty. Historical analysis provides context for current market conditions. Similar periods of data divergence have typically resolved within three to six months as one dataset converges toward the other. During these resolution periods, currency markets often experience heightened volatility but generally establish clearer trends once consensus emerges about economic direction. Global Context and Currency Crosscurrents The USD’s performance cannot be analyzed in isolation from global economic developments. European Central Bank and Bank of Japan policy decisions create important crosscurrents affecting currency valuations. Additionally, emerging market dynamics influence USD demand through trade and investment flows. These global factors interact with domestic US data to create the complete picture for currency markets. Recent developments in European economies have particular relevance for USD valuation. Moderate economic recovery in the Eurozone has supported the Euro against the Dollar, creating additional complexity for USD forecasts. Similarly, Bank of Japan policy normalization efforts have introduced new variables into currency calculations. These international developments must be weighed alongside domestic US data when assessing overall USD prospects. Trade-weighted dollar indices provide valuable perspective on these global interactions. These indices measure USD strength against currencies of major trading partners, offering more comprehensive assessment than traditional currency pairs. Recent movements in trade-weighted indices suggest that global factors may be exerting increasing influence on USD valuation relative to domestic economic data. Conclusion The current USD analysis environment presents significant challenges due to conflicting signals between PPI data and consumer sentiment indicators. While wholesale price measures suggest persistent inflationary pressures that typically support currency strength, weakening consumer confidence creates countervailing forces that may limit USD appreciation. Danske Bank’s research highlights the importance of monitoring both datasets alongside Federal Reserve communications and global economic developments. Market participants should prepare for continued volatility as these conflicting signals gradually resolve into clearer economic trends. Ultimately, the USD’s trajectory will depend on which dataset proves more predictive of actual economic performance in coming months. FAQs Q1: What is the Producer Price Index (PPI) and why does it matter for the USD? The Producer Price Index measures average changes in selling prices received by domestic producers for their output. It matters for the USD because it serves as a leading indicator for consumer inflation, influencing Federal Reserve policy decisions that directly impact currency valuation. Q2: How does consumer sentiment affect currency markets? Consumer sentiment affects currency markets through multiple channels including retail spending patterns, inflation expectations, and economic growth projections. Weak sentiment can signal future economic slowing, potentially leading to more accommodative monetary policies that may weaken a currency. Q3: Why are PPI and consumer sentiment showing different trends? These indicators measure different aspects of the economy at different stages. PPI captures wholesale price changes in the production pipeline, while consumer sentiment reflects household confidence about future economic conditions. They can diverge due to timing differences, sector variations, or distinct influencing factors. Q4: How does Danske Bank analyze conflicting economic data? Danske Bank employs a multi-factor analysis approach that considers data reliability, historical relationships, sector breakdowns, and leading indicator properties. Their analysts weigh conflicting signals based on predictive power for actual economic outcomes rather than reacting to individual data points in isolation. Q5: What should forex traders watch when economic data conflicts? Forex traders should monitor Federal Reserve communications, relative economic performance against other countries, technical support/resistance levels, and resolution patterns from historical data conflicts. Risk management becomes particularly important during periods of conflicting economic signals. This post USD Analysis: Deciphering the Critical Clash Between PPI and Consumer Sentiment Data first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

15 Apr 2026, 08:33

Bitcoin Scarcity Levels Heighten as Saylor and Institutional Players Close Entry Path

Major institutional buyers, led by MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor, appear to be closing off opportunities for new investors to accumulate Bitcoin.

15 Apr 2026, 08:31

See the Actual Code Linking XRP to ISO 20022 and SWIFT

Crypto researcher SMQKE shared a post on X presenting what he described as code-level evidence connecting XRP with SWIFT infrastructure and ISO 20022 messaging standards. The post included screenshots of code imports referencing financial messaging systems, settlement services, and XRP-related components. SMQKE stated in the X post that “the actual code linking XRP to ISO 20022 and SWIFT” is visible, encouraging readers to examine the material directly. The attached image shows multiple import statements from a development environment associated with Corda-based financial applications. Among the references are SWIFT service modules, XRP payment types, and settlement-related classes. The presence of these elements suggests that developers have explored or built frameworks where XRP-based settlement mechanisms could operate alongside traditional financial messaging systems. SMQKE emphasized that any entity seeking to function within the SWIFT network must comply with ISO 20022 standards . He noted that XRP is already aligned with ISO 20022 requirements , which positions it for compatibility with systems that rely on that standard. According to the post, this alignment creates a pathway for Ripple’s technology to connect with SWIFT-enabled institutions and potentially facilitate settlement through the XRP Ledger . The actual code linking XRP to ISO 20022 and SWIFT Any token or company aspiring to operate on the SWIFT network must adhere to ISO 20022 compliance. Since XRP is ISO 20022-ready, and SWIFT relies on these standards, Ripple can technically establish direct connections and… https://t.co/2tV3w2LnxY pic.twitter.com/WE6LPmIwme — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) April 13, 2026 Focus on ISO 20022 Compatibility and SWIFT Access The central claim in SMQKE’s post is that ISO 20022 compliance serves as the key requirement for integration with SWIFT systems. By highlighting XRP’s readiness for ISO 20022, the researcher suggested that the asset could technically interact with institutions operating under SWIFT messaging protocols. The code references shown in the image include both SWIFT-related services and XRP settlement types, which SMQKE presented as supporting evidence of this possibility. He further argued that such compatibility enables direct connections between XRP-based systems and traditional financial institutions. The implication is that XRP could function within existing financial infrastructure without requiring fundamental changes to established standards, provided that the integration is implemented. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Skepticism Emerges Over Practical Deployment Despite the technical references shared, not all responses to the post accepted the conclusion. A user identified as J. Anderson responded on X with a more cautious perspective. Anderson stated that “code snippets don’t equal deployment,” stressing that the existence of integration code does not confirm real-world adoption. He added that SWIFT has explored distributed ledger technology solutions for years without committing to full implementation. According to Anderson, financial institutions remain reluctant to transfer settlement control to non-sovereign digital assets. His response underscored the distinction between experimental or test environments and production-level financial systems. This exchange highlights a recurring divide within the digital asset sector. On one side, developers and researchers point to technical compatibility and integration capabilities. On the other hand, critics focus on regulatory, institutional, and operational barriers that may limit adoption. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post See the Actual Code Linking XRP to ISO 20022 and SWIFT appeared first on Times Tabloid .