hodler

13 Apr 2026, 20:30

Scaramucci says SpaceX is a proof companies now view Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset

SpaceX is holding onto 8,285 bitcoins valued at $603 million even as the company reported a nearly $5 billion loss for 2025, new data shows. The aerospace firm keeps its digital currency in Coinbase Prime custody and has not sold any despite the financial hit, according to the data from Arkham Intelligence and The Information report published Friday. The loss is a complete turnaround from the previous year when SpaceX made about $8 billion in profit on sales between $15 billion and $16 billion. The company’s bitcoin balance stayed steady since the middle of 2024 after hitting a peak value above $1.6 billion during October 2025 when bitcoin reached record highs. SpaceX now ranks as the fourth-biggest known corporate bitcoin owner, trailing only Strategy, Marathon Digital, and Riot Platforms. SpaceX filed for an initial public offering last month that will require the company to reveal its bitcoin holdings in public documents for the first time. This could force the company to make accounting choices under new FASB rules that started in late 2025. SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci said the mov e shows how companies will treat bitcoin going forward. “Everyone will soon have Bitcoin on their corporate balance sheet,” he said, calling SpaceX the ultimate example of keeping bitcoin as a company reserve asset. One company drives corporate Bitcoin buying Public and private companies added 47,435 bitcoins to their holdings in March, worth around $3.2 billion at month-end prices. But nearly all those purchases came from one buyer. Michael Saylor’s Strategy bought 44,377 bitcoins in March alone, including 22,337 bitcoins on March 16 funded by $1.57 billion from selling STRC preferred shares and MSTR common stock. The company now controls two-thirds of all bitcoin held by public companies, with total holdings around 762,000 bitcoins. Beyond Strategy, corporate interest in bitcoin appears to be cooling. Public companies bought aggressively last summer, but purchases have fallen and sales have picked up since October. Only 16 companies bought bitcoin in March. Ryan Strauss from the Bitcoin Consulting Group said the numbers show “how structurally dependent headline holdings growth is on Strategy.” He added that removing Strategy from the totals reveals “clear deceleration” and “a broad cooling in corporate conviction.” Kraken gets direct Fed access Kraken received approval for a Federal Reserve master account as reported by Cryptopolitan previously, allowing the crypto exchange to hold balances at the Fed and settle U.S. dollar transactions on Fedwire without using traditional banks. The company’s co-CEO Arjun Sethi told Fortune that Kraken went through Wyoming to get a Special Purpose Depository Institution charter. The Independent Community Bankers of America and 42 state banking associations opposed the decision. Representative Maxine Waters asked the Kansas City Fed to explain its legal authority for approving the account. The approval comes as institutional money flows back into bitcoin. Spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds attracted $789 million last week, the highest weekly amount since February. Morgan Stanley launched its own bitcoin ETF on April 8, charging 0.14% and giving its 16,000 wealth advisors access to bitcoin for $6.2 trillion in client assets. Charles Schwab, serving 39 million brokerage clients, published a framework showing aggressive portfolios could hold up to 8.8% in bitcoin. Wall Street analysts have year-end 2026 price targets ranging from $100,000 to $250,000 for bitcoin. However, TD Cowen cut its Strategy price target by 20.5% to $350, and some traders predict bitcoin could drop below $50,000 by November 2026. Your keys, your card. Spend without giving up custody and earn 8%+ yield on your balance with Ether.fi Cash.

13 Apr 2026, 20:22

Bitcoin rebounds 4% to $73,400 after weekend dip

🚀 Bitcoin bounced back 4% to $73,400 after weekend losses. Top crypto stocks, like Circle and Gemini, soared up to 11%. Continue Reading: Bitcoin rebounds 4% to $73,400 after weekend dip The post Bitcoin rebounds 4% to $73,400 after weekend dip appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

13 Apr 2026, 20:10

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Eyes Gap Fill as Bullish Monthly Signal Builds

Bitcoin traders are watching two chart setups that point to different parts of the market structure but lean in the same direction. One highlights a near term CME gap fill, while the other points to growing strength on the monthly chart. Bitcoin Opens CME Session With Gap Down as Trader Watches $69.5K Fill Bitcoin opened the CME futures session with a gap down into the middle of a rising channel, according to chart analysis shared by Super฿ro on X. The setup places short term focus on the $69,500 area, where the trader said a gap fill and a retest of the 50 day simple moving average could shape the next move. BTC CME Futures Daily Chart. Source: Super฿ro on X The daily chart shows Bitcoin trading near $71,030 while moving inside an upward sloping channel. At the same time, the 50 day simple moving average sits just below recent price action, while the 200 day simple moving average remains far higher and continues to slope downward. That leaves Bitcoin between near term support and overhead resistance. Super฿ro said the preferred move would be a fill of the $69,500 gap, followed by a retest of the 50 SMA. After that, the analyst pointed to higher unfilled gaps above as the next possible target. However, the post added that the lower $67,000 gap may not be filled soon. The chart also marks nearby support around the lower end of the channel and resistance near the recent local high around $73,600. As a result, traders are watching whether Bitcoin can hold the middle of the structure or slip lower before attempting another push upward. Bitcoin Monthly Chart Signals Further Strength After Inverted Hammer, Analyst Says Bitcoin may be setting up for another strong monthly move after printing an inverted hammer candlestick last month, according to chart analysis shared by CW on X. The analyst said the broader structure still points higher and argued that momentum could build further in the next month. Bitcoin Monthly Chart with Inverted Hammer and Sub Indicator Golden Cross. Source: CW on X The chart takes a wider view of Bitcoin’s cycle and focuses on monthly candles rather than short term swings. In that setup, the inverted hammer appears after a pullback, which traders often watch as a possible sign that selling pressure is fading and buyers are starting to regain control. CW also pointed to sub indicators that are moving closer to a golden cross. That signal happens when a shorter term momentum line crosses above a longer term one and is often read as a sign of strengthening trend conditions. In this case, the analyst said that crossover has not fully happened yet, but it is getting closer. At the same time, the chart suggests the latest monthly recovery is part of a broader bullish structure rather than a brief rebound. If that pattern holds, traders may look for confirmation in the next monthly candle and in the behavior of momentum indicators.

13 Apr 2026, 20:05

Expert States 3 Basic Reasons He Holds XRP In His Personal Portfolio

The cryptocurrency market thrives on bold claims and shifting narratives, but only a few digital assets continue to anchor serious, long-term conviction among investors. XRP remains one of those assets. Despite years of regulatory uncertainty and market volatility, it continues to attract attention for its real-world utility and evolving institutional relevance. Crypto commentator Mason Versluis recently outlined why he still holds XRP in his personal portfolio, pointing to a combination of technological efficiency, legal clarity, and shifting market dynamics. His stance reflects a broader sentiment among investors who view XRP as more than just another speculative token. High-Speed Settlement Driving Utility XRP’s core advantage lies in its ability to settle cross-border transactions within seconds . Traditional financial systems, particularly correspondent banking networks, often require several days to complete international transfers. These delays increase costs, tie up liquidity, and introduce unnecessary friction. 3 basic reasons I hold $XRP in my personal portfolio: 1. Settlement speed beats everyone else. XRP settles cross-border payments in 3-5 seconds vs. long ass DAYS. Banks moving $5T daily in foreign exchange may want that gap closed. Ripple already has agreements with Santander,… — MASON VERSLUIS (@MasonVersluis) April 12, 2026 The XRP Ledger eliminates much of that inefficiency by enabling near-instant settlement . Financial institutions that process trillions of dollars in daily foreign exchange flows continue to explore faster alternatives. Ripple has already established partnerships with major global players such as Santander and SBI Holdings, reinforcing XRP’s role in modernizing payment infrastructure. Legal Clarity Strengthens Institutional Confidence Regulation has long stood as a barrier to institutional adoption in the crypto space. That dynamic shifted significantly after the landmark 2023 ruling in the case involving the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The court determined that XRP sales on public exchanges do not qualify as securities transactions. This decision provided much-needed clarity and removed a major source of uncertainty. Institutional investors, who typically avoid regulatory gray areas, can now engage with XRP under clearer guidelines. This shift has improved market confidence and opened the door for broader participation. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Supply Dynamics and Long-Term Accumulation Market behavior also plays a crucial role in XRP’s investment thesis. A growing share of XRP supply appears to be moving into long-term holdings, reducing the amount of liquid tokens available on the market. This trend often signals strong investor conviction and can influence price dynamics over time. At the same time, XRP-related investment products continue to gain traction in select markets. As more capital flows into structured products and custodial solutions, the circulating supply tightens further. In financial markets, reduced supply combined with rising demand often creates conditions for upward price pressure. A Strategic Bet on Financial Infrastructure XRP’s appeal extends beyond price speculation. Its utility in cross-border payments , combined with improved regulatory clarity and evolving market structure, positions it as a strategic asset within the digital economy. For investors like Versluis, XRP represents a calculated bet on the future of global financial infrastructure rather than a short-term trade. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Expert States 3 Basic Reasons He Holds XRP In His Personal Portfolio appeared first on Times Tabloid .

13 Apr 2026, 20:05

Ondo Finance Seeks SEC No-Action to Integrate Blockchain Into Securities Infrastructure

Ondo Finance is seeking SEC no-action relief for a model that integrates Ethereum into regulated securities, aiming to enable tokenized operational processes while preserving existing legal ownership and custody structures. Key Takeaways: Ondo Finance seeks SEC no-action relief for tokenized securities model on Ethereum. Structure improves utility without altering existing legal framework for securities. Bitgo

13 Apr 2026, 20:05

US Dollar Plummets: Failed Talks and Hormuz Shutdown Trigger Unprecedented Risk-Off Wave

BitcoinWorld US Dollar Plummets: Failed Talks and Hormuz Shutdown Trigger Unprecedented Risk-Off Wave Global currency markets experienced significant turbulence on Thursday as the US Dollar registered unexpected declines against major counterparts, despite escalating geopolitical tensions that typically drive demand for safe-haven assets. The simultaneous collapse of critical diplomatic negotiations and the reported shutdown of key shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz created a complex risk environment that defied conventional market expectations. This development represents a notable divergence from historical patterns where geopolitical instability typically strengthens the dollar’s position as the world’s primary reserve currency. US Dollar Decline Defies Conventional Market Logic Currency traders witnessed a counterintuitive movement in early Thursday trading sessions as the Dollar Index (DXY) fell approximately 0.8% to 103.45, marking its steepest single-day decline in three weeks. This downward pressure occurred despite clear risk-off signals across broader financial markets. The euro gained 0.9% to trade at 1.0950 against the dollar, while the Japanese yen appreciated 0.6% to 147.85 per dollar. Market analysts immediately noted the unusual nature of this currency movement, given the simultaneous flight from risk assets in equity and commodity markets. Several interbank trading desks reported unusually high volume during the European session, with particular emphasis on dollar-selling pressure against commodity-linked currencies. The Australian dollar, typically sensitive to risk sentiment, surprisingly held ground against the greenback despite broader market anxiety. This paradoxical behavior suggests that currency markets may be pricing in longer-term structural concerns about dollar dominance rather than reacting to immediate geopolitical headlines. Trading algorithms initially amplified the movement before human intervention established more measured positions. Technical Analysis Reveals Critical Support Levels Chart patterns indicate the dollar breached several key technical levels during the session’s most volatile period. The breakdown occurred despite the currency approaching what many analysts considered strong support around the 104.20 level on the DXY. The 50-day moving average, previously acting as dynamic support, now serves as immediate resistance. Market technicians highlight that sustained trading below the 103.80 level could signal further downside potential toward the 102.50 support zone established in early January. Geopolitical Catalyst: Strait of Hormuz Shipping Disruption The immediate trigger for market anxiety emerged from confirmed reports of complete maritime traffic suspension through the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical oil transit chokepoint. According to shipping data and regional authorities, all vessel movement ceased following unspecified security incidents. This strategic waterway normally facilitates the passage of approximately 21 million barrels of oil daily, representing about 21% of global petroleum consumption. The complete shutdown represents an unprecedented event with immediate implications for global energy markets and, consequently, currency valuations. Historical data illustrates the Strait’s critical importance to global trade flows: Metric Volume Global Share Oil Transit (Daily) 21 million barrels 21% LNG Transit (Daily) 2.5 billion cubic feet 20% Total Trade Value (Annual) $1.2 trillion Not applicable Energy market analysts immediately revised price forecasts upward, with Brent crude futures surging 8.2% to $94.75 per barrel in early European trading. This dramatic increase in energy costs creates inflationary pressures across importing economies while simultaneously generating windfall revenues for petroleum-exporting nations. Currency markets typically respond to such developments through several transmission channels: Petrodollar recycling shifts as oil revenues flow to exporting nations Import cost inflation in major economies like the Eurozone and Japan Terms of trade deterioration for energy-importing countries Central bank policy expectations adjusting to supply-side inflation Diplomatic Breakdown Compounds Market Uncertainty Concurrent with the maritime disruption, diplomatic sources confirmed the complete collapse of multilateral negotiations aimed at de-escalating regional tensions. These talks, involving several Gulf states and international mediators, had continued for months with occasional signs of progress. Their abrupt failure removes what markets had priced as a potential stabilizing mechanism for the region. The diplomatic vacuum increases uncertainty regarding conflict resolution timelines and raises the probability of prolonged disruption to trade flows. Foreign ministry statements from participating nations cited “irreconcilable differences on fundamental security arrangements” as the primary reason for the negotiation breakdown. This development particularly concerns market participants because previous regional crises typically featured ongoing diplomatic channels even during periods of heightened military posturing. The absence of such communication mechanisms increases the potential for miscalculation and escalation, creating what risk analysts term a “diplomatic vacuum premium” in asset pricing. Historical Precedents and Market Reactions Financial historians note that similar geopolitical events have produced varied currency market responses depending on their perceived impact on global growth versus dollar-specific factors. The 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, for instance, produced only temporary dollar weakness as markets focused on global growth implications. Conversely, the initial phases of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022 drove significant dollar strength as investors sought safe-haven assets. The current situation appears unique in combining immediate supply disruption with longer-term questions about regional stability and diplomatic resolution prospects. Broader Market Impact and Cross-Asset Correlations The currency market movements occurred within a broader risk-off environment across global financial markets. Equity indices in Asia and Europe declined between 2-3%, while traditional safe-haven assets experienced mixed performance. Gold prices advanced 1.8% to $2,350 per ounce, reflecting its continued status as a crisis hedge. However, US Treasury yields exhibited surprising behavior, with the 10-year note yield rising 12 basis points despite the risk-off sentiment. This unusual correlation breakdown between bonds and the dollar suggests markets may be pricing in inflationary consequences from the energy supply shock. Several intermarket relationships displayed abnormal behavior during the session: Dollar-gold correlation turned positive temporarily, breaking the typical inverse relationship Equity volatility (VIX) surged 35% while currency volatility measures increased only moderately Commodity currency performance diverged from typical oil price sensitivity patterns Yield curve movements suggested expectations for stagflation rather than pure risk aversion This breakdown in conventional correlations created challenges for systematic trading strategies and risk parity approaches, potentially amplifying price movements as automated systems adjusted positions. Several major hedge funds reportedly experienced significant position liquidations related to broken correlation assumptions. Central Bank Policy Implications and Forward Guidance The geopolitical developments arrive at a particularly sensitive moment for global monetary policy. The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, and Bank of Japan all face complex policy decisions balancing growth concerns against persistent inflationary pressures. Energy-driven supply shocks complicate this calculus by simultaneously threatening economic growth through higher costs while adding to inflationary pressures. Currency markets appear to be adjusting expectations for policy divergence among major central banks in response to these developments. Market-implied probabilities for Federal Reserve rate cuts shifted significantly during the trading session, with September meeting expectations moving from 85% probability of a cut to just 60%. This repricing reflects concerns that energy-driven inflation could delay monetary easing. Conversely, expectations for ECB policy remained relatively unchanged, suggesting markets perceive the Eurozone as more vulnerable to energy supply disruptions. This policy divergence expectation may partially explain the euro’s strength against the dollar despite broader risk aversion. Regional Currency Impacts and Emerging Market Vulnerabilities The Strait of Hormuz disruption creates particularly acute challenges for currencies in energy-importing emerging markets. The Indian rupee, South Korean won, and Turkish lira all experienced pressure during Asian trading hours. These economies maintain substantial petroleum import requirements and limited strategic reserves relative to consumption needs. Central banks in affected regions announced enhanced dollar liquidity provisions and, in some cases, direct intervention to stabilize their currencies. Energy-exporting nations’ currencies presented a more mixed picture. The Russian ruble and Norwegian krone gained modestly against the dollar, reflecting their status as alternative energy suppliers. However, Gulf Cooperation Council currencies, typically closely managed against the dollar, showed minimal movement due to their pegged exchange rate regimes. This stability in GCC currencies despite regional turmoil reflects both substantial foreign exchange reserves and political commitments to existing parity arrangements. Supply Chain and Trade Flow Implications Beyond immediate energy market impacts, the shipping disruption threatens broader global supply chains already strained by recent geopolitical developments. Maritime insurers reportedly suspended coverage for vessels transiting the region, effectively halting container shipping and dry bulk transport through the critical route. This affects not only energy commodities but also manufactured goods, agricultural products, and industrial components moving between Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Shipping analysts identify several immediate consequences: Alternative route activation around the Cape of Good Hope, adding 10-14 days to Asia-Europe transit times Freight rate increases of 150-200% for affected routes based on early indications Inventory depletion acceleration for just-in-time manufacturing systems Trade finance complications due to documentary requirements tied to specific shipping routes These logistical challenges compound existing inflationary pressures and potentially delay the global disinflation process that central banks had anticipated. The currency market implications extend beyond direct energy impacts to encompass broader trade competitiveness and terms-of-trade considerations. Conclusion The US Dollar’s decline amid significant geopolitical turmoil represents a complex market response to intersecting risk factors. The simultaneous Strait of Hormuz shutdown and diplomatic breakdown created conditions where traditional safe-haven flows competed against structural concerns about energy-driven inflation and growth impacts. Currency markets priced not only immediate risk aversion but also longer-term implications for monetary policy divergence and global trade patterns. This development underscores the evolving nature of currency market dynamics in an increasingly multipolar world where geopolitical events transmit through multiple channels with sometimes countervailing effects. Market participants will closely monitor shipping resumption prospects and diplomatic developments for indications of whether this represents a temporary dislocation or a more fundamental reassessment of dollar valuation drivers. FAQs Q1: Why did the US Dollar fall despite increased geopolitical risk? The dollar declined due to competing market forces including expectations that energy price spikes could delay Federal Reserve rate cuts, concerns about US economic exposure to supply chain disruptions, and potential shifts in petrodollar recycling patterns away from dollar assets. Q2: How long might the Strait of Hormuz shutdown affect currency markets? Currency impacts depend entirely on the disruption’s duration. A resolution within days would likely see reversed flows, while prolonged closure could trigger fundamental reassessments of trade patterns and energy dependencies with lasting currency implications. Q3: Which currencies benefit most from this situation? Traditional safe-haven currencies like the Swiss franc and Japanese yen typically benefit, along with currencies of energy-exporting nations not directly involved in the conflict, such as the Norwegian krone and Canadian dollar. Q4: How does this affect Federal Reserve policy decisions? Energy-driven supply shocks complicate the Fed’s mandate by simultaneously threatening growth (suggesting easier policy) while boosting inflation (suggesting tighter policy). Markets have reduced expectations for near-term rate cuts as a result. Q5: What should forex traders monitor in coming sessions? Traders should watch shipping resumption announcements, diplomatic communications, energy inventory data, and technical levels on the Dollar Index (particularly 103.80 support and 104.50 resistance) for directional signals. This post US Dollar Plummets: Failed Talks and Hormuz Shutdown Trigger Unprecedented Risk-Off Wave first appeared on BitcoinWorld .