Invest ideasNews
12 Apr 2026, 10:00
Why North Korea keeps stealing billions in crypto — out in the open
As North Korea's infiltration tactics grow more sophisticated, security experts say the crypto industry needs to understand what sets the regime apart from every other state-backed hacker — and why that difference makes it a dangerous threat to the ecosystem.
12 Apr 2026, 09:50
Bitcoin’s most predictable technical line sets BTC’s next low before rally
A long-term Bitcoin ( BTC ) technical structure is hinting at possible near-term losses ahead of a major rally, as the asset continues to hold above the $70,000 level. In this line, analysis of the weekly chart shows a decade-long ascending trendline, often called a “parabolic guard”, that has consistently underpinned Bitcoin’s biggest bull runs, linking key macro lows and repeatedly acting as a launchpad for strong rallies. Historical data shared by cryptocurrency analyst Ali Martinez in an X post on April 11 indicates that each test of this rising support has been followed by outsized gains. Bitcoin price analysis chart. Source: Ali Martinez In past cycles, rebounds from this level preceded moves of roughly 963% in 2017, about 261% in 2018, over 1,100% in 2020, and around 660% after the 2022 touchpoint. These repeated reactions reinforce the trendline as one of Bitcoin’s most reliable long-term indicators. Notably, the current setup shows price approaching this ascending support, with a projected touch zone between $56,000 and $60,000, as it consolidates and then compresses while maintaining a broader uptrend with higher highs and higher lows. The trendline’s upward slope suggests each cycle is forming at higher valuations. Recent price action shows Bitcoin pulling back from highs near at $126,000 toward this support, in line with past corrections that preceded renewed rallies. While not guaranteed, the consistency of this trendline makes it a key level, with the coming weeks critical in determining whether Bitcoin respects this support and rebounds. Bitcoin price analysis By press time, Bitcoin was trading at $71,580, down about 1.5% over the past 24 hours but still up more than 4% on the week. Bitcoin seven-day price chart. Source: Finbold Technical indicators remain mixed, with short- and long-term momentum diverging. The price is trading above the 50-day SMA at $69,505, suggesting near-term support, but remains well below the 200-day SMA at $89,298, indicating the broader trend is still under pressure. The 14-day RSI stands at 61.58, reflecting neutral-to-moderately bullish momentum without entering overbought territory. This leaves room for further upside, though the lack of stronger momentum points to ongoing uncertainty. Overall, while short-term signals suggest stabilization, the longer-term structure has yet to confirm a sustained bullish reversal. The post Bitcoin’s most predictable technical line sets BTC’s next low before rally appeared first on Finbold .
12 Apr 2026, 09:38
Bitcoin resilient at $71K as Islamabad US-Iran peace talks end in deadlock
12 Apr 2026, 09:11
Bittensor’s Co-Founder Apologizes As 15% TAO Crash And Governance Crisis Follow Covenant AI Exit
Covenant AI sparked the conversation when it announced its departure from Bittensor this week. This, resulting in a massive downward trend for $TAO, falling more than 15% after the announcement, showing a rapid decline in confidence and increased uncertainty. https://t.co/IdB9DPr5u0 — const (@const_reborn) April 11, 2026 Co-Founder Apologizes as Covenant AI Tensions Escalate Following the ongoing crisis, the co-founder of Bittensor has written an apology to the community for what happened. The statement acknowledged the financial losses suffered by investors and the loss of trust in the ecosystem. The co-founder said most of the damage that went down ended up being caused by Samuel Dare himself, saying it was destructive to the protocol and its key stakeholders. And that made it very personal, a betrayal not just to the project but also to the larger vision they had shared that guided their collaboration. On its humanistic level, the statement carried a burden of reflection, an acknowledgment of the physical and financial cost to users who had put their trust in the ecosystem. The apology was aimed at those who had lost both money and faith in the company during the upheaval. In the face of this late-tragedy, however, the co-founder according to his records found it sufficient simply not to respond in-kind, casting doubt over whether to pursue retribution and opening discussion on how best to move past the disaster. The Debate Over Decentralization Takes Center Stage This situation has rekindled an important conversation among the crypto and AI communities: how decentralized are decentralized systems, in reality? The allegations brought forward by Covenant AI imply that governance within the network may be far more centralized than originally intended. The outgoing chief justice admitted this week that he warned the prime minister against “presidential decisions” during his last year in office, when directors and heads of agencies made decisions critical to controlling emissions or managing infrastructure. The co-founder, on the other hand, defended the design of the protocol, reiterating that Bittensor was built to withstand human failings like greed, strife and treachery. He argued that true decentralization does not remove these problems, but creates a system which can withstand and adapt to them. This philosophical split highlights a deeper challenge facing decentralized A. I. networks. Although the underlying technology allows for participation to be open, governance structures are often transient and continue to change as does the ecosystem itself. Locked Stake proposal to rebuild faith In light of this, moving forward, the leadership behind Bittensor is proposing some structural changes to avoid future occurrences like this. At the heart of this initiative is a new model for long-term commitment, known as “locked stake”, that creates an incentive system where only participants willing to commit their stake over long time periods can gain the expected reward. This way, the new system will tie token ownership with time-based constraints essentially begging the question of stake and duration. This introduces a new avenue for accountability to teams, where lockup aligns with both your conviction and even long-term holdings. The mechanism will help the network become more transparent and incentive-aligned. It could make commitment more visible and easier to quantify, allowing investors to better assess the trustworthiness of subnet operators and project teams. This concept was, interestingly, one of the last contributions made before Samuel Dare’s departure from working with David Johnston and Sonya Deen and thus adds a little irony to the situation. If carried out, the locked stake mechanism could be a major breakthrough in trying to solve one of Web3’s biggest ongoing headaches: how to build trust without centralized enforcement for open, permissionless systems. Community Steps In To Revive Important Subnets However, even amidst the chaos, work is already underway to restore the ecosystem. The SN3, SN39 and SN81 subnets previously operated by Covenant AI should continue to operate as they are open-source. Such networks are taking the form of community members, miners and probably ex contributors rallying to keep them alive and revitalise. This decentralized response showcases a core strength of Bittensor: its ability to live beyond any single actor. The co-founder noted that no one entity owns these subnets vision or functionality. Instead, they are compelling pieces of a larger, collaborative framework that empowers participants to jump in and carry development forward. This resilience is being challenged in real time. These recovery efforts will serve as a critical barometer for whether Bittensor’s decentralized model will be able to survive discord and provide ongoing continuity. Covenant AI Crisis Highlights Future Of Decentralized AI Governance The development surrounding the exit of Covenant AI is momentous not only for Bittensor but also for the larger decentralized AI movement. They expose the strengths and vulnerabilities of building open systems at the intersection of blockchain and artificial intelligence. On the one hand, the incident demonstrates the dangers of governance ambiguity and concentrated power. On the other, it speaks to the promise of recovery and innovation driven by communities. The co-founder ended his statement by reiterating Bittensor’s mission: to create a truly decentralized, community-owned AI network where no one person has ultimate control. He argued that despite recent setbacks, the protocol was still one of the most advanced and ambitious efforts in its domain. As the ecosystem matures, focus will turn to re-establishing trust, improving governance and enabling matrixes such as locked stake to solidify the network’s base. In the meantime, given decentralized protocols such as Ethereum continue to attract money and power towards their ecosystems, this crisis is both a warning to those involved about the need for management structures and an opportunity, a sign that decentralization is not something passive or static but rather something dynamic that must continuously adapt to changes in technological landscape. Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services. Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news !
12 Apr 2026, 09:08
Bittensor’s $TAO dives to $265 after Covenant AI quits key subnets, Steeves issues apology
🚨 Bittensor’s $TAO crashes to $265 after Covenant AI leaves top subnets. Bittensor co-founder Jacob Steeves apologizes and rejects centralization claims. Continue Reading: Bittensor’s $TAO dives to $265 after Covenant AI quits key subnets, Steeves issues apology The post Bittensor’s $TAO dives to $265 after Covenant AI quits key subnets, Steeves issues apology appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
12 Apr 2026, 09:02
Here’s How Ripple Could Trigger an Increase In XRP Price
Crypto researcher SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) recently shared documentation that repositions a long-standing assumption about XRP’s price potential. Most retail investors treat demand from individual buyers as the primary price driver, but the documentation tells a different story. According to the material SMQKE shared, institutional adoption moves XRP’s price, and that has been the case from the start. What the Document Reveals Ripple operates at the base layer of the payments stack. It provides settlement functionality to banks, money transmitters, and financial institutions. The protocol does not interact directly with consumers or businesses. Ripple executives have consistently reiterated that the company does not control XRP , and as the documentation states, it “does not govern retail prices.” Ripple gives financial institutions the flexibility to pass cost savings on to their end customers while managing their own profit margins. The network exists to serve institutional infrastructure. It’s important to note: “Ripple does not govern retail prices.” The projected price levels were designed for institutional use, making it clear that institutions, not retail demand, will ultimately drive the price of XRP. “Over time if the Ripple protocol becomes widely… pic.twitter.com/qPSn7u4eaM — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) April 10, 2026 XRP’s Role in the Network XRP works as a bridge asset and provides liquidity on the network. The documentation directly addresses the impact of institutional demand on XRP’s price. “Over time, if the Ripple protocol becomes widely adopted, demand for XRP may increase, leading to an increase in price.” The price thesis connects to institutional adoption The Institutional Price Driver SMQKE highlights a key detail from the documentation. Ripple positions investors as participants in “the value transport layer of the Internet.” The comparison is to foundational protocols like HTTP or SMTP. Those protocols enable infrastructure rather than govern consumer behavior, and XRP operates on the same logic. Projected price levels exist within an institutional context. The documentation points to widespread adoption by financial institutions as the mechanism through which demand, and therefore price, may rise. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 The Significance of this Documentation The price narrative for XRP has a solid basis, and that basis consistently points to institutional adoption. The documentation is also specific about what XRP is designed to do. It works with institutions rather than around them. It does not seek to disintermediate existing financial players the way peer-to-peer networks do. SMQKE’s post brings that architecture back into focus. According to documented sources, the price of XRP rises with institutional adoption. XRP is already receiving notable attention from these institutions , and the community is eager to see how high the asset can climb as more institutions join the network. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Here’s How Ripple Could Trigger an Increase In XRP Price appeared first on Times Tabloid .
