Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%


PRICE
+26.76%
$1.74

PRICE
+7%
$0.06372

PRICE
+6.7%
$0.3210

PRICE
+4.87%
$0.03426
PRICE
+4.38%
$2.09

PRICE
+2.28%
$426.47

PRICE
+1.83%
$0.01057

PRICE
+1.78%
$9.52

PRICE
+1.68%
$0.1804

PRICE
+1.41%
$8.84

PRICE
+1.35%
$402.53

PRICE
+1.28%
$0.09799

PRICE
+1.09%
$0.1172

PRICE
+0.81%
$0.08489

PRICE
+0.80%
$80,848.11

PRICE
+0.71%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.70%
$60.17

PRICE
+0.50%
$2.08

PRICE
+0.43%
$0.3391

PRICE
+0.37%
$0.1491

PRICE
+0.23%
$0.9998

PRICE
+0.08%
$10.33

PRICE
+0.03%
$115.13

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9998

VOL24
+14,309.1%
$0.9999

VOL24
+575.96%
$1.74

VOL24
+404.33%
$2,939.54

VOL24
+306.15%
$0.9991

VOL24
+193.44%
$0.9998

VOL24
+190.8%
$0.3210

VOL24
+128.05%
$9.52

VOL24
+119.29%
$4,533.45

VOL24
+114.35%
$0.1491

VOL24
+110%
$4,518.86

VOL24
+103.28%
$0.1030

VOL24
+102.54%
$0.7566

VOL24
+84.98%
$0.9995

VOL24
+75.46%
$1.01

VOL24
+74.48%
$445.5

VOL24
+72.49%
$1.28

VOL24
+71.11%
$60.17

VOL24
+67.04%
$0.9998

VOL24
+66.35%
$3.32

VOL24
+62.11%
$0.9997

VOL24
+61.73%
$80,848.11
VOL24
+59.37%
$0.01051

VOL24
+59.33%
$8.5
VOL24
+52.91%
$0.02897

VOL24
+50.65%
$8.84

PRICE
+26.76%
$1.74

PRICE
+7%
$0.06372

PRICE
+6.7%
$0.3210

PRICE
+4.87%
$0.03426
PRICE
+4.38%
$2.09

PRICE
+2.28%
$426.47

PRICE
+1.83%
$0.01057

PRICE
+1.78%
$9.52

PRICE
+1.68%
$0.1804

PRICE
+1.41%
$8.84

PRICE
+1.35%
$402.53

PRICE
+1.28%
$0.09799

PRICE
+1.09%
$0.1172

PRICE
+0.81%
$0.08489

PRICE
+0.80%
$80,848.11

PRICE
+0.71%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.70%
$60.17

PRICE
+0.50%
$2.08

PRICE
+0.43%
$0.3391

PRICE
+0.37%
$0.1491

PRICE
+0.23%
$0.9998

PRICE
+0.08%
$10.33

PRICE
+0.03%
$115.13

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9998

VOL24
+14,309.1%
$0.9999

VOL24
+575.96%
$1.74

VOL24
+404.33%
$2,939.54

VOL24
+306.15%
$0.9991

VOL24
+193.44%
$0.9998

VOL24
+190.8%
$0.3210

VOL24
+128.05%
$9.52

VOL24
+119.29%
$4,533.45

VOL24
+114.35%
$0.1491

VOL24
+110%
$4,518.86

VOL24
+103.28%
$0.1030

VOL24
+102.54%
$0.7566

VOL24
+84.98%
$0.9995

VOL24
+75.46%
$1.01

VOL24
+74.48%
$445.5

VOL24
+72.49%
$1.28

VOL24
+71.11%
$60.17

VOL24
+67.04%
$0.9998

VOL24
+66.35%
$3.32

VOL24
+62.11%
$0.9997

VOL24
+61.73%
$80,848.11
VOL24
+59.37%
$0.01051

VOL24
+59.33%
$8.5
VOL24
+52.91%
$0.02897

VOL24
+50.65%
$8.84
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$2,334.11
#14160
$702,342
$0.00
312.1
312.1
5 May 2026, 02:34

Ethereum is trading in a narrow range, but derivatives positioning suggests the market is far from calm underneath. CoinGlass data shows roughly $874 million in long positions face liquidation below $2,206, while $403 million in shorts face liquidation above $2,412. The 24-hour realized liquidation picture skews bullish. Total forced closures reached approximately $33 million, with shorts accounting for $25.93 million and longs only $7 million, per CoinGlass. Ethereum liquidation heatmap showing concentrated leverage clusters around current price | Source: Coinglass Whales bought 140,000 ETH while price held Santiment data shows large holders accumulated more than 140,000 ETH between May 1 and May 3, worth roughly $322 million, shared by Ali Martinez . Whale balances moved from 13.83 million ETH to 13.98 million ETH over the window. Whales have gone on a buying spree, accumulating over 140,000 Ethereum $ETH in the last 96 hours, worth around $322 million. pic.twitter.com/uHZqV3B0W9 — Ali Charts (@alicharts) May 3, 2026 CryptoQuant order-size data adds texture worth paying attention to. Whale buys clustered at $2,005 to $2,100 in early April, then migrated to $2,250 to $2,300 by late April. On May 2, the largest single spot buy was 556 ETH at $2,316. Whales accumulated on the way up, not on weakness, which is the kind of detail that changes how you read the bid. ETF flows turned positive after a rough week Institutional flows turned positive again on May 1 after four straight days of outflows. Spot Ethereum ETFs recorded net inflows of $101.2 million per Farside Investors , with the bulk concentrated in two funds. Ethereum ETF net flows show a May 1 reversal to $101.2M in inflows. | Source: Farside Investors BlackRock’s ETHA pulled in $43.2 million. Fidelity’s FETH added $49.4 million. Other issuers had smaller, mixed flows. $2,400 is the ceiling, but ETH/BTC is the bigger tell Order book data shows dense sell-side liquidity between $2,350 and $2,500, which is why $2,400 has functioned as resistance. Analyst Ted Pillows put it bluntly: “ETH is still going sideways” until $2,400 is reclaimed. The contrarian signal worth watching is the ETH/BTC ratio, currently around 0.0294. Michaël van de Poppe identified 0.032 as the breakout threshold. “If it clearly breaks 0.032 BTC, that’s where the party starts,” he wrote on X. The ratio matters because whale accumulation in dollar terms can coexist with ETH continuing to underperform Bitcoin if cycle dominance hasn’t shifted yet. ETH/BTC ratio at 0.0294 with 0.032 as the breakout threshold. | Source: TradingView The ratio matters because whale accumulation in dollar terms can coexist with ETH continuing to underperform Bitcoin if cycle dominance hasn’t shifted yet. Cryptopolitan reported earlier that ETH built higher lows from $1,840 to $2,450 through March and April before pulling back, with the technical structure described as recovering but fragile. Why the compression matters Open interest sits around $30 billion, with ETH-specific 24-hour futures volume near $18 billion, while spot volume is under $1 billion. That ratio is what makes the setup unstable. Leverage is building faster than spot demand can resolve direction. A clean break above $2,412 or below $2,206 would force liquidations that could amplify the move in whichever direction breaks first. Until one of those levels gives, positioning rather than spot demand is what’s setting price. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .
5 May 2026, 02:00

Ethereum has been struggling to push above local highs as buyers search for the conviction needed to break through resistance above $2,300. The price action is frustrating — a market that keeps approaching a level without clearing it — and the chart alone does not explain why the upward pressure has been building. A CryptoOnchain analysis has just identified something in the network data that may be the answer the price chart is not providing. Related Reading: ‘Ethereum’s Price Should Have Dropped Already’ – Analyst Explains The On-Chain Signal Behind The Warning In late April 2026, Ethereum’s smart contract activity reached an all-time high. The metric tracking transfers generated by external contract calls —a measure of how actively the network’s programmable infrastructure is being used—surged from 142,194 on April 10 to a peak of 309,032 on April 25. That is a 117% increase in fifteen days. Reaching a level of smart contract interaction that the Ethereum network has never recorded before. The timing creates a divergence that demands examination. Ethereum’s most fundamental measure of utility just set a historic record — and the price has been trading sideways, unable to push decisively above $2,300. The network is being used more than at any point in its history. The market has not priced that in. That gap between what the network is doing and what the price is doing is where the story lives — and it is the gap that tends to close eventually rather than persist. The Network Set a Record The CryptoOnchain analysis addresses the most important interpretive question directly: what caused the surge? A single airdrop, a viral protocol launch, or a speculative frenzy can inflate network activity metrics temporarily without reflecting genuine adoption. The investigation found that none of those explanations apply here. The April surge was broad-based and multi-factor. Throughout the month, the Ethereum mainnet recorded an all-time high in total transactions. Stablecoin transfer volumes grew nearly 119% year-to-date — real financial activity moving through the network at a pace nearly double what it was at the beginning of the year. Layer-2 settlement activity remained strong, gaming and social decentralized applications recorded rising engagement, and DeFi platforms contributed additional volume across the ecosystem simultaneously. No single driver explains the record. All of them together do. The price context makes the finding more significant rather than less. During the same period that network activity was setting historic records, Ethereum’s price moved from approximately $2,245 to $2,320 — a modest 3% movement that reflects none of the urgency visible in the on-chain data. The activity explosion and the price stability coexisted for the entirety of April. That combination — record utility driven by organic adoption, with price barely reacting — is the signature of a network whose real-world usage has grown ahead of its market valuation. The history of asset pricing suggests that the gap does not persist permanently. It tends to close in the direction of the fundamentals. Related Reading: Ethereum Is Up 30% But Shorts Refuse to Let Go – The Last Time This Setup Didn’t End Quietly Ethereum Grinds Higher Into Resistance as Structure Tightens Ethereum is trading around $2,340 after extending its recovery from the February low, but the chart shows a market still struggling to convert strength into a breakout. Price has built a clear sequence of higher lows since mid-March, forming a constructive ascending structure that now presses directly into the $2,350–$2,400 resistance zone. This area has capped every recent rally attempt and coincides with the declining 100-day moving average, while the 200-day remains well above, reinforcing the broader bearish context. The result is compression: rising short-term support meeting persistent overhead supply. Related Reading: XRP’s Leverage Has Been Flushed Out, But Price Is Still Holding: Find Out What Follows That Setup The 50-day moving average is now rising beneath price and acting as dynamic support, currently near the $2,200–$2,250 region. As long as Ethereum holds above this zone, the higher-low structure remains intact and continues to build pressure against resistance. Volume trends suggest controlled accumulation rather than aggressive expansion. The recovery lacks the impulsive participation typically seen in confirmed trend reversals, which explains the repeated hesitation at resistance. A decisive break above $2,400 would mark a structural shift and likely open the path toward $2,700. Conversely, losing the $2,200 support would weaken the structure and expose Ethereum to a deeper retracement toward the $2,000 level. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
4 May 2026, 20:45

Aave LLC is asking a U.S. federal court to lift a restraining order that has frozen roughly $73 million in Ether (ETH) recovered after the Kelp DAO exploit. In an emergency motion filed on May 4 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the lending protocol said the funds should go back to users who lost money in the attack, not be held to satisfy unrelated terrorism judgments. From exploit to courtroom The dispute traces back to an April 18 exploit involving Kelp DAO’s rsETH token, a liquid staking derivative representing staked ether. An attacker allegedly abused a flaw in a cross-chain bridge, a system that allows assets to move between blockchains, to borrow around $230 million in ether from Aave users using unbacked collateral. Within days, the Arbitrum Security Council stepped in, identifying wallets tied to the attacker and moving 30,766 ether into a controlled address. The recovery was seen as a rare early win in a sector where stolen funds are often difficult to claw back. But that momentum stalled on May 1. Lawyers representing U.S. nationals with terrorism-related claims against North Korea secured a restraining notice that effectively froze the recovered funds, Cryptopolitan reported. Their argument hinges on the alleged involvement of the Lazarus Group—a hacking collective widely linked by authorities to Pyongyang. In court filings, the plaintiffs said the crypto assets qualify as “property in which a terrorist party has an interest,” opening the door for seizure under U.S. laws designed to compensate victims of state-sponsored terrorism. Aave pushes back Aave argues that reasoning goes too far. While the platform acknowledges the seriousness of the claims, it says the legal theory risks redirecting stolen funds away from the actual victims of the exploit. It also disputes whether the Lazarus Group attribution has been definitively proven. “A thief does not own what he steals,” Stani Kulechov said in a post on X on May 4. “These funds belong to the affected users they were stolen from.” In its filing, Aave described the frozen assets as “traceable proceeds of theft,” and urged the court to either lift the order or require the plaintiffs to post a $300 million bond if the freeze remains in place. Recovery effort in limbo The frozen ether sits at the heart of a broader industry response. Aave Labs and partners, including Kelp DAO, LayerZero, and others, formed a coalition—dubbed “DeFi United”—to stabilize the ecosystem after the attack. So far, the group has raised more than 137,700 ether, worth about $327 million, to help restore backing for rsETH holders. But the recovery plan assumes the release of the seized 30,766 ether now caught in legal limbo. Before the court order, Arbitrum DAO participants had already begun voting to transfer the funds into a multi-signature wallet overseen by ecosystem stakeholders and security firm Certora. The proposal drew overwhelming support—but it is now effectively on hold. Legal observers say the DAO has little room to act independently while the order is in force. “Arbitrum DAO is not allowed to do anything with the KelpDAO funds for now, until a divestiture hearing,” said Gabriel Shapiro in a post on X. A broader legal test for DeFi At its core, the case highlights a growing tension: when decentralized systems take coordinated action, such as freezing funds, do they begin to resemble traditional financial intermediaries in the eyes of the law? A forthcoming divestiture hearing will decide who ultimately controls the assets. Until then, the funds remain frozen, caught between two competing claims: victims of a crypto exploit and creditors seeking compensation for acts of state-sponsored terrorism. The outcome could shape how courts treat DAO-governed assets in future disputes, particularly when those assets are secured or immobilized through collective action. Meanwhile, parts of the stolen ether remain in motion elsewhere, with blockchain analysts tracking funds as they are routed through laundering channels and converted into stablecoins on other networks. For Aave and its users, the priority is speed. The protocol has asked the court to fast-track proceedings, warning that delays could weaken efforts to make victims whole. Your bank is using your money. You’re getting the scraps. Watch our free video on becoming your own bank
4 May 2026, 20:05

Bitmine Immersion Technologies has unveiled a $13.1 billion treasury, with ethereum comprising roughly $12.1 billion of the total. Key Takeaways: Bitmine reached $13.1 billion in holdings on May 3, 2026, including 5.18 million ETH and 200 Bitcoin. Ranking as the #2 global treasury, Bitmine now trades $625 million daily, outpacing firms like DoorDash. Thomas Lee