Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%


PRICE
+24.64%
$0.8959

PRICE
+5.21%
$42.89
PRICE
+3.6%
$0.03836

PRICE
+3.49%
$1.83

PRICE
+2.73%
$0.008940

PRICE
+0.92%
$71.12

PRICE
+0.10%
$1.1

PRICE
+0.09%
$0.9988

PRICE
+0.09%
$1.13

PRICE
+0.03%
$0.9998

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.01%
$114.62

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9999

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.01

PRICE
+0%
$1.03

PRICE
+0%
$1.21

PRICE
+0%
$11.02

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+89,063.1%
$1.13

VOL24
+310.58%
$0.9999

VOL24
+173.96%
$0.9993

VOL24
+139.12%
$0.9988

VOL24
+99.45%
$0.9973

VOL24
+81.43%
$0.04764

VOL24
+68.06%
$0.057

VOL24
+63.08%
$71.12
VOL24
+55.12%
$0.03836

VOL24
+52.02%
$4,866.43

VOL24
+49.06%
$6.97

VOL24
+43.49%
$2,701.14

VOL24
+39.55%
$2.15

VOL24
+36.32%
$0.052

VOL24
+36.26%
$0.9997

VOL24
+34.96%
$0.7701

VOL24
+28.45%
$1.83

VOL24
+17.3%
$0.9997

VOL24
+13.28%
$0.8895

VOL24
+12.6%
$4,863.7
VOL24
+9.65%
$0.008434

VOL24
+9.2%
$452.24

VOL24
+7.54%
$0.056
VOL24
+3.5%
$0.03209

VOL24
+2.7%
$0.3034

PRICE
+24.64%
$0.8959

PRICE
+5.21%
$42.89
PRICE
+3.6%
$0.03836

PRICE
+3.49%
$1.83

PRICE
+2.73%
$0.008940

PRICE
+0.92%
$71.12

PRICE
+0.10%
$1.1

PRICE
+0.09%
$0.9988

PRICE
+0.09%
$1.13

PRICE
+0.03%
$0.9998

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9993

PRICE
+0.01%
$114.62

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.01%
$0.9999

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.01

PRICE
+0%
$1.03

PRICE
+0%
$1.21

PRICE
+0%
$11.02

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

VOL24
+89,063.1%
$1.13

VOL24
+310.58%
$0.9999

VOL24
+173.96%
$0.9993

VOL24
+139.12%
$0.9988

VOL24
+99.45%
$0.9973

VOL24
+81.43%
$0.04764

VOL24
+68.06%
$0.057

VOL24
+63.08%
$71.12
VOL24
+55.12%
$0.03836

VOL24
+52.02%
$4,866.43

VOL24
+49.06%
$6.97

VOL24
+43.49%
$2,701.14

VOL24
+39.55%
$2.15

VOL24
+36.32%
$0.052

VOL24
+36.26%
$0.9997

VOL24
+34.96%
$0.7701

VOL24
+28.45%
$1.83

VOL24
+17.3%
$0.9997

VOL24
+13.28%
$0.8895

VOL24
+12.6%
$4,863.7
VOL24
+9.65%
$0.008434

VOL24
+9.2%
$452.24

VOL24
+7.54%
$0.056
VOL24
+3.5%
$0.03209

VOL24
+2.7%
$0.3034
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


Rank #699
$0.004940
-3.3%

Rank #1221
$0.1414
-3.73%
![Phoenix Global [OLD]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoin-images.coingecko.com%2Fcoins%2Fimages%2F1074%2Flarge%2Fphoenix-logo.png%3F1696502176&w=3840&q=75)
Rank #1399
$0.002277
+0%
Rank #4143
$0.0008690
-2.45%

Rank #4262
$0.004582
-10.97%

Rank #5928
$0.0004930
+0%

Rank #15783
$0.001180
+0%

Rank #18565
$0.0004990
+0%

Rank #19164
$0.09512
+0%

$0.06182
#507
$44,483,192
$39,913,464
709,984,438.92
1,186,707,049
Terra 2.0 which will assume the Terra name is a new blockchain launched by Terraform Labs as part of the passing of governance proposal 1623. The Terra protocol is a decentralized and open-source public blockchain protocol. Luna is the Terra protocol’s native staking token used for governance and mining. Users stake Luna to validators who record and verify transactions on the blockchain in exchange for rewards from transaction fees. The Terra 2.0 chain will not have a stablecoin and holders of the old Terra Classic chain will be airdropped new Luna native coins. In the plan, developers of the Terra ecosystem are to migrate and deploy their dapps on the new blockchain.
18 Mar 2026, 17:30

Bitcoin is once again at the center of attention as a fresh wave of on-chain activity brings one of the most closely watched trading firms back into focus. Recent data shows that Jane Street has resumed moving Bitcoin, drawing renewed attention at a time when scrutiny around its past actions has not fully subsided. On-Chain Bitcoin Data Reveals Coordinated Inflows Recent blockchain tracking data highlights a clear resurgence in activity tied to wallets associated with Jane Street. Within roughly two hours, these wallets received a combined 205.36 BTC, valued at approximately $15.08 million at the time. The inflows originated from two major trading platforms, BitMEX and LMAX Digital . The transaction breakdown shows a coordinated pattern. A 150 BTC transfer worth about $11.01 million moved from a BitMEX hot wallet, followed by 55.33 BTC valued at roughly $4.06 million from LMAX Digital. Additional smaller transfers of 0.02 BTC and 0.01 BTC were also recorded from BitMEX-linked wallets. All funds were directed into a single receiving wallet linked to the firm . The timing and clustering of these transactions point to deliberate execution. Movements from exchange hot wallets into a unified address typically reflect institutional positioning, such as liquidity setup or internal rebalancing . The rapid sequence and scale reinforce the view that this was a coordinated operation, signaling that Jane Street is once again actively engaging with the Bitcoin market. Jane Street And The Terra/LUNA Collapse, Allegations The renewed activity comes as Jane Street remains under scrutiny for its alleged role during the Terra/LUNA collapse in May 2022, one of the most significant failures in crypto market history. The Terra ecosystem, developed by Terraform Labs , revolved around two key tokens: UST, an algorithmic stablecoin designed to maintain a $1 peg, and LUNA, which absorbed volatility to support that peg. In early May 2022, large withdrawals from the Anchor Protocol, where UST deposits were earning high yields, began to destabilize the system. As UST fell below $1, increasing amounts of LUNA were minted to stabilize it, which rapidly diluted LUNA’s value. Within days, UST collapsed far below its peg, and LUNA dropped from over $80 to near zero, wiping out tens of billions in market value. Legal filings allege that Jane Street purchased LUNA at a significant discount—around $0.40 per token—before the collapse, with terms allowing favorable conversion or sale. As the market destabilized, it’s claimed the firm sold parts of its holdings while prices were still above acquisition cost, potentially realizing profits of roughly $1 billion. Jane Street denies wrongdoing, asserting that its actions were standard market-making and trading operations, not insider activity . The controversy continues to influence discussions on institutional behavior in crypto markets. Any renewed activity, such as the recent Bitcoin inflows by Jane Street, draws scrutiny from analysts and investors alike, highlighting the market-moving potential of major players.
9 Mar 2026, 01:00

The price of Bitcoin has struggled to muster a sustained upward climb over the last few weeks, with the latest one failing around the $74,000 mark in the past week. However, the premier cryptocurrency seems to have deeper problems than failed price recovery attempts. According to a crypto market expert, the Bitcoin price is at a stage reminiscent of the bearish period of 2022. Is BTC About To Witness A Repeat Of 2022? In a March 8 post on the X platform, Chartered Market Technician Tony Severino shared an interesting insight into the current situation of the Bitcoin market. The crypto pundit hypothesized that the world’s largest cryptocurrency might have to endure a bearish period associated with the Terra (LUNA) ecosystem crash in 2022. The rationale behind this evaluation is the steady decline in the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator on BTC’s two-week price chart. MACD is a prominent momentum indicator used in technical analysis to identify trend direction, momentum changes, and potential entry and exit positions. Typically, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator has two lines: the MACD line (green) and the signal line (red), and a histogram, which reflects the distance between the two aforementioned lines. The histogram, which is the primary momentum indicator, is currently signaling a strong bearish momentum. This observation is because the histogram bars are expanding, signaling rising momentum in the current direction (which is bearish because the bars are below the neutral or zero line). According to Severino, the MACD indicator is even expanding to levels not seen since 2022, when the Terra (LUNA) ecosystem collapse sent bearish shockwaves through the entire crypto market. 2W Bitcoin LMACD momentum is around the same point before the Luna collapse in 2022 It’s possible something nasty is coming How are you managing your risk? And do you even know how? pic.twitter.com/SFzsYJxiZc — Tony Severino, CMT (@TonySeverinoCMT) March 8, 2026 The crypto market analyst said, “it is possible that something nasty is coming,” suggesting that another crypto winter might be imminent. After Terra’s collapse in May, the premier cryptocurrency would have fallen from above $50,000 to around $30,000 — about a 40% decline — by July 2022. However, it is important to note that the market might have already priced in what is currently being seen in the MACD indicator, which is often considered a lagging indicator. Moreover, Bitcoin has already lost nearly 30% of its value so far in 2026. Bitcoin Price At A Glance At the time of this writing, the price of BTC stands at around $67,520, reflecting no significant movement in the past 24 hours.
7 Mar 2026, 14:03

A former CFO in Washington was sentenced by the US Department of Justice to 2 years in prison for wire fraud after duping his employer out of $35 million to finance his own crypto project. Last November, prosecutors scored a wire fraud conviction against Nevin Shetty, 42. He allegedly diverted the money to his HighTower Treasury platform in 2022, after learning in April that performance issues would lead to the end of his CFO position. Shetty funneled the money without the board’s or executives’ knowledge and used it for high-yield DeFi lending operations, claiming returns of 20% or more. The DOJ said Shetty intended to provide his employer with a limited, fixed return while taking the remaining profits through HighTower. Within the first month, the operation generated roughly $133,000. But the market turmoil that washed over his operation after the collapse of the Terra ecosystem took a heavy toll. The value of his crypto investments tumbled from $35 million to near nothing. The DOJ had asked for a nine-year sentence for Nevin Shetty The DOJ reported that once the $35 million was essentially gone, Shetty confessed to two of his fellow executives what he had done. After which, he was immediately fired. He was then formally charged in May 2023. Judge Tana Lin later found Shetty guilty on four counts of wire fraud in November 2025, noting that his actions deeply impacted the company and upended the lives of its 60 employees. She added, “You almost put the company out of business…. You were playing with money that wasn’t yours.” Prosecutors had sought a nine-year sentence for Shetty, arguing that his deception and fraud inflicted massive losses and led to 60 layoffs, but the court instead imposed a two-year term. Shetty was also fined $35,000,100 and will spend three years on supervised release after prison. Additionally, Judge Lin barred him from serving as an officer or director of any company unless he is cleared by the probation office. Do Kwon was sentenced to prison last year for committing crypto fraud Crypto entrepreneur Do Kwon was similarly sentenced last December to 15 years in prison for fraud. On December 31, 2024, he was extradited, and he later entered a plea of guilty in August 2025, after which US District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer handed down his sentence. According to US Attorney Jay Clayton, the mogul deceived investors while inflating the value of Terraform’s digital assets for his own gain. The mogul claimed that Terraform’s blockchain technology enabled it to build a fully decentralized financial ecosystem, with its own currency, payment platform, stock exchange, and savings bank. In reality, Terraform’s main products didn’t function as Kwon had assured and were manipulated to give the false impression of a working decentralized financial system to attract investors. Clayton had also accused Kwon of trying to conceal his fraudulent schemes, launder the funds he obtained, and attempt to buy political immunity in foreign nations. Although Kwon expressed remorse in court after the victims, in person and by phone, described the devastating impact of his scheme on savings, charitable causes, and everyday lives. Another victim also wrote to the judge that he thought about ending his life after the scheme destroyed his father’s retirement savings. Nonetheless, Judge Engelmayer sentenced him to a 15-year term, noting, “Your offense caused real people to lose $40 billion in real money, not some paper loss.” He even described Kwon’s operation as “a fraud on an epic, generational scale.” Former FTX CEO Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried was also handed a 25-year prison term in 2024, though he filed an appeal. As of Friday, however, the Second Circuit had not issued a decision since arguments were heard in November. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .
6 Mar 2026, 10:10

BitcoinWorld Revealing Move: Jane Street-Linked Address Transfers $19M in Bitcoin to Exchanges Amid Market Scrutiny In a significant on-chain movement that has captured market attention, a cryptocurrency address suspected of belonging to the prominent quantitative trading firm Jane Street deposited 270 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $19 million, to major exchanges Bullish and LMAX Digital. Blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain first reported this substantial transfer, which occurred within a concentrated two-hour window, sparking immediate analysis and placing the firm’s activities under renewed scrutiny. This development arrives against a complex backdrop of ongoing legal challenges and market controversies surrounding the firm’s cryptocurrency operations. Analyzing the $19 Million Jane Street Bitcoin Deposit Lookonchain’s data indicates the transfer involved moving a large Bitcoin holding from a private, custodial wallet to two institutional-grade trading venues. Market participants and analysts routinely monitor such movements from entities like Jane Street, as they can signal impending trading activity or changes in asset allocation strategy. Consequently, the deposit’s timing and scale provide critical context for understanding current market dynamics. Furthermore, blockchain transparency allows for real-time tracking of these flows, offering a window into the strategies of major market participants. Jane Street Group, founded in 2000, operates as a global quantitative trading firm and liquidity provider. The firm engages in high-volume trading across numerous asset classes, including equities, ETFs, options, futures, and cryptocurrencies. Its entry into the digital asset space marked a significant moment of institutional adoption. The firm’s trading strategies typically rely on sophisticated algorithms and data analysis to execute trades at high speeds and volumes. Transaction Volume: 270 BTC, worth ~$19 million at the time of transfer. Destination Exchanges: Bullish (a regulated crypto exchange) and LMAX Digital (an institutional FX and crypto venue). Data Source: On-chain analysis by Lookonchain, a recognized blockchain intelligence platform. Historical Context and Legal Challenges This recent transaction unfolds alongside persistent legal and reputational challenges for Jane Street within the crypto ecosystem. Most notably, Terraform Labs, the developer behind the collapsed TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin and Luna (LUNA) token, previously filed a lawsuit against the firm. Terraform Labs alleged that Jane Street engaged in insider trading activities that contributed to the destabilization and ultimate failure of its algorithmic stablecoin in May 2022. The lawsuit claimed the firm used non-public information to profit from the impending collapse. Jane Street has consistently denied these allegations. The legal battle highlights the increased regulatory and legal scrutiny facing traditional finance firms operating in the less-regulated cryptocurrency markets. Moreover, the collapse of Terra represented a pivotal crisis for the industry, erasing tens of billions in market value and triggering a prolonged “crypto winter.” Algorithmic Selling Controversy Explained Separate from the Terra lawsuit, Jane Street has recently faced market criticism over its trading patterns. Some analysts and commentators have publicly speculated that the firm’s algorithmic trading systems have exerted consistent downward pressure on Bitcoin’s price. Specifically, claims emerged that the firm executed substantial sell orders programmed to trigger daily at 10 a.m. U.S. Eastern Time. Proponents of this theory point to observable patterns of increased selling volume and price dips coinciding with that time window. However, establishing direct causality in complex, global markets remains notoriously difficult. Market makers like Jane Street provide essential liquidity by continuously offering to buy and sell assets, which inherently involves high-frequency trading activity that can influence short-term price movements. The firm has not publicly commented on these specific algorithmic selling claims. Potential Implications for Bitcoin Markets The deposit of $19 million in Bitcoin to exchanges does not automatically equate to an immediate sell order. Institutional players utilize exchanges for various purposes beyond simple liquidation. However, such a move typically precedes trading activity. Analysts consider several potential motivations for this transfer. First, the firm may be preparing to execute a large client order or rebalance a portfolio, requiring immediate access to exchange liquidity. Second, it could represent a risk-management move, shifting assets in anticipation of volatility or to meet collateral requirements. Third, it might signal a strategic decision to reduce direct Bitcoin exposure through over-the-counter (OTC) desks or other means. The choice of Bullish and LMAX Digital is also noteworthy, as both cater to professional and institutional clients, suggesting the planned activity is large-scale and sophisticated. Recent Major Institutional Bitcoin Movements Entity Approximate Value Action Reported Date Suspected Jane Street Address $19 Million Deposit to Bullish & LMAX Recent U.S. Government (Seized Assets) $900 Million+ Periodic Auctions/Transfers Ongoing Major Mining Pool $50 Million Withdrawal from Exchange Previous Month Market sentiment often reacts to large exchange inflows from known entities, as they increase the immediate sell-side pressure available on order books. Therefore, monitoring for subsequent outflows from these exchange wallets becomes crucial for understanding the net impact. If the Bitcoin remains on the exchanges or is sold, it could contribute to localized price pressure. Conversely, if it is moved back to cold storage, it may indicate the completion of a specific, time-bound operation. Expert Analysis on Market Maker Behavior Quantitative trading firms like Jane Street operate with different objectives than long-term “HODL” investors or speculative retail traders. Their primary goals often involve capturing small price discrepancies (arbitrage), providing liquidity for fees, and executing complex, automated strategies. Consequently, their on-chain movements should be interpreted through this lens of high-frequency, volume-driven activity rather than simple bullish or bearish sentiment. Financial regulation experts note that as traditional market makers deepen their involvement in crypto, their actions attract greater scrutiny from both regulators and the public. The opaque nature of some algorithmic strategies can lead to market perceptions of manipulation, even when activities fall within legal market-making practices. This tension underscores the growing pains of an asset class maturing under the watchful eyes of global financial authorities. Conclusion The transfer of $19 million in Bitcoin from a Jane Street-linked address to regulated exchanges represents a significant on-chain event that intertwines with the firm’s complex history in the cryptocurrency sector. While the immediate purpose of the deposit remains undisclosed, it occurs against a backdrop of a resolved lawsuit from Terraform Labs and ongoing market debates about the firm’s algorithmic influence on Bitcoin prices. This activity highlights the critical role of blockchain analytics in providing transparency into the movements of major institutional players. Ultimately, it reinforces the reality that the actions of large, sophisticated firms like Jane Street are a powerful force shaping liquidity and price discovery in the evolving digital asset markets. FAQs Q1: What did the Jane Street-linked address actually do? Blockchain data shows the address transferred 270 Bitcoin (worth about $19 million) from a private wallet to the cryptocurrency exchanges Bullish and LMAX Digital within a two-hour period. Q2: Why is Jane Street controversial in crypto? The firm faced a lawsuit from Terraform Labs alleging insider trading related to the Terra/Luna collapse. More recently, it has faced claims that its algorithmic trading creates consistent selling pressure on Bitcoin at a specific time each day. Q3: Does depositing Bitcoin to an exchange mean they are selling it? Not necessarily. While exchange deposits often precede a sale, institutions also move assets to exchanges to provide liquidity, execute large client orders, or meet collateral requirements for other trades. Q4: What are Bullish and LMAX Digital? Bullish is a regulated cryptocurrency exchange focused on deep liquidity. LMAX Digital is an institutional trading venue for foreign exchange and cryptocurrencies, catering primarily to professional traders and funds. Q5: How do people know an address belongs to Jane Street? Blockchain analytics firms like Lookonchain use clustering techniques, tracing transaction patterns, and correlating off-chain data to associate wallet addresses with known entities. These are often reported as “suspected” or “linked” because firms rarely publicly confirm ownership of specific addresses. This post Revealing Move: Jane Street-Linked Address Transfers $19M in Bitcoin to Exchanges Amid Market Scrutiny first appeared on BitcoinWorld .