hodler

25 Apr 2026, 17:44

Optimism price prediction 2026–2032: Will OP token gain momentum?

Key takeaways: By the end of 2026, OP is expected to have a minimum and maximum price of about $0.08 and $0.45, respectively. Optimism price prediction for 2029 suggests the token could reach a maximum value of $2.80. In 2032, OP tokens will range between $0.55 and $4.50, with an average value of $1.90. Optimism’s (OP) commitment to innovation is highlighted by its support for Layer-3 solutions. These solutions enable the development of decentralized applications (dApps) on top of Layer-2 chains, contributing to the expansive Optimism Superchain. The platform’s initiatives, including introducing custom gas tokens and Plasma mode aimed at reducing onboarding and operational costs, make it more accessible for new users and developers. As the market closely watches the price movements and growth trajectory of the token, can Optimism reach $10 soon? Let’s get into the OP price prediction for 2026 – 2032. Overview Cryptocurrency Optimism Token OP Price $0.1204 Market Cap $256.94M Trading Volume $56.34M Circulating Supply 2.136B OP All-time High $4.85 (Mar 06, 2024) All-time Low $0.2519 (Dec 26, 2025) 24-hour High $0.1203 24-hour Low $0.1104 Optimism price prediction: Technical analysis Metric Value Volatility (30-day Variation) 4.07% (Medium) 50-Day SMA $0.1904 14-Day RSI 52.79 (Neutral) Sentiment Bearish Fear & Greed Index 23 (Extreme Fear) Green Days 15/30 (50%) 200-Day SMA $0.4626 Optimism price analysis TL;DR Breakdown: OP faced rejection at $0.133 and is down ~6–7%. The 4-hour timeframe shows momentum breakdown and loss of trend strength. OP stay bullish if it holds $0.120; otherwise, further downside is likely. Optimism 1-day price chart As of April 25, OP is trading around $0.1242 after rejecting from the recent high near $0.1335, marking a pullback of roughly 6–7%. Despite the broader recovery from the $0.105 area, this rejection signals weakening upside momentum as price struggles to sustain higher levels. OPUSDT 1-day price chart by TradingView OP remains above the 20-day MA at $0.1197, which still acts as support, keeping the overall structure mildly bullish. However, the upper Bollinger Band near $0.1335 has clearly capped the move, and current candles show hesitation with lower highs forming. The MACD indicator remains positive but is flattening, indicating momentum is no longer expanding. A hold above $0.120 keeps the structure intact, but a break below this level would likely trigger a deeper pullback toward $0.115–$0.110. Optimism 4-hour price chart On the 4-hour timeframe, OP has formed a clear local top around $0.129–$0.133 and is now pulling back toward $0.124, reflecting a short-term decline of about 4–5%. The recent sharp red candles indicate sellers stepping in with more conviction. OPUSDT 4-hour price chart by TradingView The coin is slipping back into the Alligator cluster, signaling loss of trend strength and transition into either consolidation or downside continuation. The previous bullish expansion has stalled, and structure now shows lower highs in the short term. MACD is still slightly positive but flattening, suggesting weakening bullish momentum. If price fails to hold $0.124, a move toward $0.120 becomes likely, and a break below that would accelerate downside toward $0.117. Optimism technical indicators: Levels and action Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $0.1228 BUY SMA 5 $0.1230 BUY SMA 10 $0.1247 SELL SMA 21 $0.1185 BUY SMA 50 $0.1173 BUY SMA 100 $0.1637 SELL SMA 200 $0.2644 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $0.1237 BUY EMA 5 $0.1234 BUY EMA 10 $0.1224 BUY EMA 21 $0.1200 BUY EMA 50 $0.1281 SELL EMA 100 $0.1715 SELL EMA 200 $0.2791 SELL What to expect from Optimism? OP is showing signs of short-term weakness after rejection, and unless it quickly reclaims $0.128–$0.130, the probability favors a continued pullback toward lower support levels. Is Optimism a good crypto investment? Optimism (OP) could be a good investment if you believe in Ethereum scaling and the growth of Layer 2 solutions. However, like all crypto, it’s risky, and its value depends on adoption and market trends. Only invest what you’re willing to lose! Will OP recover? A recovery is possible, but we fear the overall bearish sentiment makes a short-term rebound unlikely. However, as the market consolidates, we expect reduced volatility, which may lead to a breakout in either direction, depending on market dynamics. Will OP reach $50? Reaching $50 for Optimism (OP) would be an ambitious target, requiring a significant increase in its price. This level would likely only be achievable in a highly favorable market environment, with substantial advancements in Ethereum adoption, widespread use of Layer 2 solutions, and strong overall market growth. Will OP reach $100? Reaching $100 for Optimism (OP) would be extremely ambitious and require unprecedented growth and adoption. Does Optimism have a good long-term future? Yes, Optimism shows strong potential for growth and sustained interest, indicating a positive long-term outlook. Recent news/opinion on Optimism Privacy Boost is live on OP Mainnet. Privacy Boost ( @PrivacyBoost ) by @sunnyside_io is live on OP Mainnet. The first privacy offering by an Optimism core developer. Drop-in SDK for confidential computing for Sunnyside's customers on any OP Stack chain. ZK + TEE hybrid. Sub-500ms proof generation. High throughput.… https://t.co/QGwaJ1IXcy — Optimism (@Optimism) April 21, 2026 Optimism joins Mastercard crypto program Innovation alone doesn't create scale. Through the Crypto Partner Program, @Mastercard is helping connect digital asset builders to the trusted infrastructure that powers real-world payments. Proud to be part of that network. pic.twitter.com/eJoULzHPCV — Optimism (@Optimism) March 11, 2026 Optimism price prediction April 2026 Optimism’s price prediction for April 2026 suggests a potential low of $0.1053, an average of $0.115, and a high of $0.1302. Optimism price prediction Potential Low Potential Average Potential High Optimism price prediction April 2026 $0.1053 $0.115 $0.1302 Optimism price prediction 2026 The price of Optimism is predicted to reach a maximum value of $0.45 in 2026. Traders can anticipate a minimum price of $0.08 and an average trading price of $0.18. Optimism price prediction Potential Low Potential Average Potential High Optimism price prediction 2026 $0.08 $0.18 $0.45 Optimism price predictions 2027–2032 Year Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2027 $0.12 $0.38 $0.90 2028 $0.22 $0.75 $1.80 2029 $0.30 $1.10 $2.80 2030 $0.25 $0.80 $2.20 2031 $0.35 $1.20 $3.20 2032 $0.55 $1.90 $4.50 Optimism price prediction 2027 In 2027, the Optimism price prediction suggests a maximum price of $0.90, an average trading price of $0.38, and a minimum price of $0.12. Optimism price prediction 2028 Per the Optimism price forecast for 2028, OP could reach a peak price of $1.80. The average price is projected around $0.75, with a minimum expected at $0.22. Optimism price prediction 2029 The Optimism price prediction for 2029 suggests a peak value of $2.80. The minimum trading price is expected to be $0.30, while the average market value is projected to be around $1.10. Optimism price prediction 2030 The Optimism forecast for 2030 suggests a minimum price of $0.25, a maximum price of $2.20, and an average price of $0.80. Optimism price prediction 2031 According to the Optimism price prediction for 2031, OP could potentially reach a maximum price of $3.20, a minimum price of $0.35, and an average value of around $1.20. Optimism price prediction 2032 In 2032, the minimum price of Optimism is forecasted to be around $0.55. OP’s value can reach a maximum of $4.50 with an average trading value of $1.90. Optimism price prediction 2026 – 2032 Optimism market price prediction: Analysts’ OP price forecast Firm 2026 2027 CoinCodex $0.1118 $0.3075 DigitalCoinPrice $0.15 $0.0578 Cryptopolitan’s Optimism (OP) price prediction Cryptopolitan’s overall price prediction for Optimism (OP) suggests a conservative outlook for the cryptocurrency in the near term. For 2026, the maximum forecast price is between $0.7 and $1. Over the next few years, Optimism is projected to appreciate substantially, with prices anticipated to rise from a minimum of $5 to a maximum of $7 by 2032. Optimism historic price sentiment Optimism price history by Coingecko OP launched with an initial value of $4.57 on May 31 but dropped sharply in June due to the UST stablecoin de-pegging and LUNA collapse, closing June at $0.5434. It further declined to $0.4147 by mid-July. In August, OP briefly surged above $1.90, but by mid-October, it dropped to $0.70 following the FTX collapse. In Q1 2023, OP surged past $3.00 during a crypto bull run but lost 66% shortly after. A recovery saw it close the year at $3.90. OP saw an eventful 2024, reaching an all-time high of $4.85 in March before sliding below $2.30 by mid-April. After a brief recovery to over $2.90 in May, it entered a bearish phase, trading at $1.82–$1.96 by July and $1.54–$1.62 by October. November brought a spark of hope with a peak at $2.60. OP closed December within the range of $1.611–$2.773. In January 2025, OP peaked at $2.18 but lost momentum, dropping to as low as $0.84 in February. OP peaked at $0.9346 in March, $0.8523 in May, $0.7478 in June, and in July, $0.86. In August, OP traded between $0.6178 and $0.880, and in September, it maintained an average price of $0.74. In November, OP traded between $0.2888 – $0.4516, and in December, the coin traded between $0.3117 – $0.3264. In January 2026, the coin maintained a trading range of $0.2213 and $0.3731, and in February, it traded between $0.109 – $0.2. In March, OP traded between $0.1001 – $0.1391, and in April, the coin is currently trading at an average price of $0.123 – $0.1328.

24 Apr 2026, 06:55

Jane Street seeks exit from Terra fallout as estate probes trading play

Quant trading giant Jane Street is pushing to dismiss Terraform Labs’ lawsuit accusing it of insider trading, calling the case a “cash grab” by the bankrupt crypto firm’s estate and arguing it is being unfairly blamed for a fraud it did not create. Terraform accuses the firm of insider trading, but Jane Street Capital says Terraform’s founder, Do Kwon, already admitted to and has been convicted of fraud. The legal battle began in February 2026, when Terraform’s bankruptcy administrator sued Jane Street for using inside information to withdraw millions of dollars before the Terra ecosystem collapsed in May 2022. How did a $40 billion crypto project collapse, and what did Jane Street have to do with it? In May 2022, large holders began selling Terraform’s UST stablecoin , and the price broke it’s $1 peg. The algorithm printed more LUNA (Terraform’s crypto coin) to fix it, but this just made the coin worth less. Both tokens wen’t into a free fall and crashed to almost zero within days, wiping out over $40 billion in value. The reason UST crashed in the first place was that Terraform lacked real-dollar reserves backing the stablecoin. This meant that the whole system could collapse if people tried selling UST at once. The SEC later discovered that Terraform lied about a Korean payment app called Chai for years. Apparently, the company told investors that the payment app processed real transactions on the Terraform blockchain and even programmed fake transactions to back their claims. Do Kwon now serves a 15-year prison sentenc e after pleading guilty to conspiracy and wire fraud in December 2024. He said he was, in his own words, “alone responsible for everyone’s pain.” What exactly is Jane Street accused of, and why does it say the lawsuit should be thrown out? As recently reported by Cryptopolitan, the Terraform bankruptcy estate accuses Jane Street of using private information as Terraform’s trading partner to profit during the crash. According to the complaint, Jane Street bet that prices would fall starting May 8, 2022, and sold off other assets on May 7. The ecosystem crashed hours later. Jane Street responded and said the “private information” was already public. According to the quant firm, Terraform had already announced the transition to a new liquidity pool weeks before, quashing any claims of back-channel communication. The defendant wrote in their filing, “This case is an attempt by the estate of Terraform Labs to extract cash from Jane Street to foot the bill for a fraud that Terraform itself perpetrated on the market.” Jane Street also raised two legal defenses: the Wagoner rule and a second one about geography. Under the Wagoner rule, Terraform cannot make Jane Street pay for its own wrongdoing, since it created the fraud that caused the collapse. In the second defense regarding geography, Jane Street argues that Terraform has not proven that the actual trades occurred within the United States. Because U.S. securities law applies to U.S. transactions, American courts may not have jurisdiction to hear the case at all. Jane Street now asks the court to dismiss the entire case “with prejudice.” Did Jane Street really dump Bitcoin every day at 10 AM, and what do analysts say? Claims that Jane Street was intentionally selling Bitcoins every day at exactly 10 AM Eastern Time spread like wildfire across the internet. A popular crypto account called Cark posted on X , accusing Jane Street of “running an algorithm” to dump Bitcoin at market open for months. According to crypto influencer Justin Bechler, Jane Street made good use of its $790 million stake in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) during that time. He says the firm would make a profit by selling real Bitcoin at 10 AM to push the price down, then buy IBIT shares at the now-lower price. “The public just sees accumulation. The actual position could be a massive short that looks like a long because the offsetting half of the trade is invisible under current disclosure rules,” Bechler wrote on X . “The 13F is a photograph of one side of the balance sheet. Nobody outside the firm can see the other side.” However, several analysts pushed back hard on the accusations. Julio Moreno, head of research at the on-chain data platform CryptoQuant, posted on X , saying that buying spot Bitcoin and selling futures at the same time was completely normal, and that hundreds of firms do it. Economist Alex Krüger called the theory a “ flawed conspiracy ,” while Bitcoin analyst Sunny Decree called it “ FAKE NEWS .” Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

24 Apr 2026, 05:29

Jane Street seeks dismissal of Terraform lawsuit tied to Terra crash

Jane Street has moved to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy estate, arguing the claims attempt to shift responsibility for the Terra-Luna collapse. In a filing before the Southern District of New York, the trading firm and several individual defendants said the case lacks merit and should be thrown out with prejudice, which would prevent the claims from being filed again. “This case is an attempt by the estate of Terraform Labs to extract cash from Jane Street to foot the bill for a fraud that Terraform itself perpetrated on the market,” the defendants wrote. Legal fallout tied to Terra collapse Looking back to the origins of the dispute, the case stems from a February complaint filed by bankruptcy administrator Todd Snyder, who accused Jane Street and its employees of using confidential information to trade ahead of the May 2022 collapse. The fallout wiped out roughly $40 billion in value and sent shockwaves across crypto markets. Snyder’s filing alleged that the firm gained access to material non-public information through contacts within Terraform, including a former intern who later joined Jane Street. Communication channels, including a group chat involving Terraform co-founder Do Kwon, were cited as possible conduits for sensitive information during a period when TerraUSD was under pressure. Central to the complaint were events on May 7, 2022, when Terraform withdrew 150 million TerraUSD from a key liquidity pool. According to the lawsuit, a wallet linked to Jane Street withdrew 85 million tokens from the same pool minutes later, a move that allegedly triggered a cascade of selling as the stablecoin lost its dollar peg. Jane Street disputes insider trading claims Addressing those allegations, the firm argued that Terraform has failed to show that any trades relied on undisclosed information. “Plaintiff points to the timing of Terraform’s transition to a new liquidity pool, but admits that the transition was publicly announced weeks earlier, acknowledges there was no market reaction to the announcement, and offers no plausible explanation for why the transition would have any impact on UST’s value,” the filing states. Records cited by the defendants show that some of Jane Street’s largest positions were taken after key details about TerraUSD’s instability had already entered the public domain. Activity around May 7 and May 8, including asset sales and the buildup of a short position, does not in itself demonstrate access to privileged information, the firm argued. Legal arguments focus on prior rulings Framing its defence around earlier enforcement outcomes, Jane Street said the underlying conduct at Terraform has already been addressed through criminal and civil proceedings. “Terraform’s fraud scheme — in which Jane Street had no involvement — has already been prosecuted, adjudicated, and punished,” the filing reads. Do Kwon, Terraform’s founder, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and wire fraud charges and is serving a 15-year sentence, while a jury previously found both Kwon and Terraform liable for securities fraud. The filing notes that Kwon admitted he was “alone responsible for everyone’s pain.” Legal arguments also invoke the “Wagoner rule,” which limits a bankruptcy estate’s ability to sue third parties over losses caused by its own fraud. Alongside that, the defendants contend that Terraform has not established that the disputed trades took place in the United States, raising questions over jurisdiction. Seeking a full dismissal, Jane Street maintains that the claims do not meet the threshold required to proceed, positioning the case as part of the ongoing legal aftermath of one of crypto’s largest failures. The post Jane Street seeks dismissal of Terraform lawsuit tied to Terra crash appeared first on Invezz

24 Apr 2026, 05:10

Jane Street Files Urgent Motion to Dismiss Terraform Labs Insider Trading Lawsuit in US Court

BitcoinWorld Jane Street Files Urgent Motion to Dismiss Terraform Labs Insider Trading Lawsuit in US Court Jane Street has filed a formal motion in a United States federal court to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Terraform Labs. The lawsuit accuses the market maker of insider trading during the catastrophic collapse of the Terra-LUNA ecosystem in 2022. According to court documents reviewed by Cointelegraph, Jane Street seeks a dismissal with prejudice. This legal term means Terraform Labs cannot refile the same claims if the court grants the motion. The case represents a critical test of accountability in the volatile cryptocurrency market. Jane Street Dismissal Motion Challenges Insider Trading Allegations In its legal filing, Jane Street argues that its trading activities in Terra-related tokens were based on publicly available market signals. The firm explicitly denies using any non-public information. This defense directly counters Terraform Labs’ central allegation that Jane Street engaged in insider trading before the ecosystem’s implosion. The motion emphasizes that Jane Street’s trading decisions relied on standard market analysis, not confidential data. The legal battle stems from the dramatic collapse of TerraUSD (UST) and its sister token LUNA in May 2022. The crash erased approximately $40 billion in market value within days. Terraform Labs, the company behind the blockchain, subsequently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2023. The lawsuit against Jane Street is one of several legal actions Terraform Labs has pursued to recover losses. Background of the Terra-LUNA Collapse The Terra ecosystem relied on an algorithmic stablecoin mechanism. UST maintained its peg to the US dollar through a complex arbitrage system involving LUNA. When a massive sell-off triggered a death spiral, the system failed catastrophically. Investors worldwide suffered severe financial losses. Regulatory authorities in multiple countries launched investigations into the collapse. Terraform Labs and its co-founder Do Kwon face civil fraud charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC alleges that the company misled investors about the stability of its stablecoin. Kwon also faces criminal charges in South Korea and the United States. His arrest in Montenegro in March 2023 added another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal saga. Jane Street’s Legal Defense and Previous Allegations Jane Street’s motion argues that Terraform Labs cannot prove the essential elements of an insider trading claim. The firm states that it traded based on observable market trends, not confidential information. It points to its standard operating procedures that prevent the use of material non-public information. Interestingly, Jane Street has previously faced separate allegations regarding its trading behavior. Critics accused the firm of driving down Bitcoin prices through algorithmic selling at 10 a.m. US time each day. However, no regulatory action resulted from those claims. Jane Street has consistently denied manipulating any market. Legal experts note that insider trading cases in cryptocurrency markets face unique challenges. Unlike traditional securities, digital assets often lack clear regulatory classifications. This ambiguity makes it difficult to establish what constitutes inside information. The court’s ruling on Jane Street’s motion could set an important precedent for future crypto-related litigation. Key Arguments in the Dismissal Motion No confidential information: Jane Street asserts it never received or used non-public data about Terraform Labs. Market signals: The firm claims its trading decisions were based on public price movements and volume patterns. Legal standard: Jane Street argues that Terraform Labs failed to meet the pleading requirements for insider trading. Dismissal with prejudice: The firm wants the case permanently closed, not just postponed. Implications for the Cryptocurrency Industry The outcome of this motion could have far-reaching consequences. If the court dismisses the case with prejudice, it may discourage similar lawsuits against market makers. Conversely, a denial could open the door for more litigation against trading firms. The cryptocurrency industry already faces intense regulatory scrutiny following the Terra collapse. Market makers play a crucial role in providing liquidity to cryptocurrency exchanges. They facilitate trading by constantly buying and selling assets. However, their activities sometimes attract suspicion, especially during volatile market events. The Jane Street case highlights the tension between legitimate market-making and potential insider trading. Regulators worldwide are developing new frameworks for digital asset markets. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation came into effect in 2024. The United States continues to debate comprehensive crypto legislation. Court rulings like this one will shape the legal landscape for years to come. Timeline of Key Events Date Event May 2022 Terra-LUNA ecosystem collapses, losing $40 billion in value January 2023 Terraform Labs files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy March 2023 Do Kwon arrested in Montenegro 2024 Terraform Labs files lawsuit against Jane Street 2025 Jane Street files motion to dismiss the lawsuit Expert Perspectives on the Case Legal analysts emphasize the importance of the dismissal motion. Professor Sarah Chen of Georgetown University Law Center notes that insider trading claims in crypto require clear evidence of information asymmetry. She states that Jane Street’s argument about market signals appears strong based on available facts. Industry observers point out that Terraform Labs faces its own legal challenges. The company’s bankruptcy proceedings continue alongside the SEC case. Some experts question whether Terraform Labs has the resources to pursue this lawsuit effectively. The company’s creditors may ultimately decide the direction of litigation. Cryptocurrency market participants watch the case closely. Many trading firms have revised their compliance procedures since the Terra collapse. They now implement stricter controls to prevent any appearance of impropriety. The Jane Street case may accelerate these industry-wide changes. Conclusion Jane Street’s motion to dismiss the Terraform Labs lawsuit represents a pivotal moment in cryptocurrency legal history. The court’s decision will clarify the boundaries of insider trading liability in digital asset markets. Jane Street argues forcefully that it acted on public market signals, not inside information. The case underscores the ongoing legal and regulatory challenges facing the crypto industry. A dismissal with prejudice would mark a significant victory for the market maker and potentially reshape future litigation strategies. FAQs Q1: What is Jane Street asking the US court to do in the Terraform Labs lawsuit? A1: Jane Street asks the US court to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice. This means the case would be permanently closed, preventing Terraform Labs from refiling the same claims. Q2: What are the insider trading allegations against Jane Street? A2: Terraform Labs accuses Jane Street of using non-public information to trade Terra-related tokens before the 2022 ecosystem collapse. Jane Street denies these allegations, stating it traded based on public market signals. Q3: What happened during the Terra-LUNA collapse in 2022? A3: The Terra-LUNA ecosystem collapsed in May 2022 when its algorithmic stablecoin UST lost its peg to the US dollar. This triggered a death spiral that erased approximately $40 billion in market value within days. Q4: Why does Jane Street want a dismissal with prejudice? A4: A dismissal with prejudice would permanently end the lawsuit. It prevents Terraform Labs from bringing the same claims again in the future. This gives Jane Street finality and avoids prolonged legal costs. Q5: How might this case affect the broader cryptocurrency industry? A5: The court’s ruling could set a precedent for insider trading cases in crypto markets. It may influence how regulators and courts treat similar allegations against market makers and trading firms in the future. This post Jane Street Files Urgent Motion to Dismiss Terraform Labs Insider Trading Lawsuit in US Court first appeared on BitcoinWorld .