hodler

19 May 2026, 16:20

Canaan Shares Plunge as CEO Says Middle East Conflict Is Clouding Outlook for Bitcoin Miners

Canaan shares fell after the Bitcoin mining company disclosed an $88.7 million first-quarter net loss, its second straight negative period.

19 May 2026, 16:20

Elon Musk Grok AI Predicts Incredible XRP Price and Bitcoin Price by End of 2026

Nobody asked Elon Musk Grok AI to pick favorites. It predicts both Bitcoin and XRP in the same breath, and the price prediction it landed on for each are not conservative by any measure. Bitcoin at $150,000 to $200,000. XRP at $5 to $8. Both by end-2026. Both driven by the same macro tailwind hitting 2 very different assets at once. Grok’s framework treats this cycle as a convergence event rather than a single-asset story. Bitcoin is solidifying its digital gold narrative with sovereign wealth funds and corporate treasuries stacking aggressively, while XRP is benefiting from Ripple’s expanding real-world payment utility, clearer US regulation, and ETF approvals unlocking institutional capital at scale. Source: Grok AI Bicoin and XRP Price Prediction The AI sees institutional adoption, ETF inflows, regulatory clarity, and rate cuts as 4 forces pulling simultaneously on both assets, which is what makes the dual prediction compelling. These are not correlated bets on the same thesis. BTC is a reserve asset story. XRP is a payment infrastructure story. Grok is saying both win in this environment, just for different reasons. The bear case applies to both equally. Macro shocks, regulatory delays, or prolonged risk-off sentiment could limit BTC to $80,000 to $110,000 and XRP to $2 to $3 in a more muted cycle. Grok closes with its verdict: structural tailwinds strongly favor the bullish scenario into 2026. Discover: The best pre-launch token sales Bitcoin Price Prediction: Grok AI Bitcoin Predicts Is $150,000–$200,000. The Chart Shows Exactly How Far Away That Is Bitcoin price is trading at $76,695 on the daily, sitting at the apex of a rising channel that has been building since the February low of $61,000. The yellow circle on the chart marks the current decision point: price is pressing against the upper trendline of the channel right now and the next few daily closes determine whether this is a breakout or another rejection back into the range. Source: Bitcoin Price / Tradingview The Grok AI bullish target zone is labeled on the chart at $145,000 to $150,000, which represents the lower end of the prediction range and sits well above every resistance level currently visible. Getting there requires clearing 2 major supply zones: $82,000 to $84,000 first, the remnant of the pre-crash consolidation, and then $96,000 to $98,000, the October 2025 highs. The chart projection shows a move from the channel breakout toward $95,000, a brief pullback toward $88,000, then continuation into the Grok target zone. Support at $72,000 to $74,000 is the lower channel boundary that has held every dip since February. Lose it and the recovery thesis resets fast. Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with XRP Price Prediction: Grok AI Sees XRP at $5–$8, For Now, $1.60 Is Still the Gate XRP price is trading at $1.37144 on the daily, and the pullback from the recent $1.50 push has brought price back toward the lower end of the 4-month range. The chart structure has not broken but the momentum has clearly faded, and with support at $1.20 not far below current price the setup demands attention rather than complacency. The chart has the full bull case mapped in sequence: resistance at $1.60, then targets at $2.40, $3.10, and $3.64. Each level is a checkpoint. None of them are accessible until $1.60 breaks first. Grok’s $5 to $8 range sits above all of them, meaning the chart targets are waypoints on the journey rather than the destination itself. The projected path shows a bounce from current levels toward $1.60, a minor pullback, then a sharp move toward $2.40 and continuation higher through the remaining targets. Support at $1.20 is the red zone on the chart and the last meaningful floor before the bull thesis breaks down entirely. At $1.37 current price is sitting uncomfortably close to that level with no strong bounce structure visible yet. RSI on the daily is at 42.87 with the signal line at 53.14, signal line well above RSI in the same pattern seen across multiple assets today. Short-term momentum has turned negative while the average lags behind. RSI approaching the low 40s from above typically either finds a floor and reverses or continues toward oversold territory, and at $1.37 with $1.20 support below, the next 3 to 5 daily closes are the most important price action XRP has seen since the February crash. Grok’s dual prediction needs BTC to lead and XRP to follow. Both charts are at decision points right now. The post Elon Musk Grok AI Predicts Incredible XRP Price and Bitcoin Price by End of 2026 appeared first on Cryptonews .

19 May 2026, 16:15

Weekly ETFs: Six of 11 sectors record outflows; consumer discretionary sector leads inflows

More on SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, SPDR Gold Shares ETF, etc. Bitcoin Options Have Turned Defensive Near $77K Rising Misery Index Signals Mounting Economic Pressure Cracks Forming Within The AI Narrative Powering The Market Rally Stock-yield correlation hits lowest level since 1999 44 out of 79 analyzed US REITs announced guidance increases during Q1: S&P Global Market Intelligence

19 May 2026, 16:15

OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy joins Anthropic to lead pre-training research team

BitcoinWorld OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy joins Anthropic to lead pre-training research team Andrej Karpathy, the prominent AI researcher who co-founded OpenAI and previously led Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self-Driving programs, has joined Anthropic to work on pre-training research. Karpathy announced the move on X Tuesday, calling the next few years at the frontier of large language models especially formative. A strategic hire for Anthropic Karpathy started this week at Anthropic, where he is working under team lead Nick Joseph on pre-training — the computationally intensive phase responsible for giving Claude its core knowledge and capabilities. An Anthropic spokesperson confirmed to Bitcoin World that Karpathy will establish a new team focused on using Claude itself to accelerate pre-training research. This hire signals Anthropic’s belief that AI-assisted research, rather than simply scaling compute, is the key to staying competitive with rivals like OpenAI and Google. Karpathy is one of the few researchers who bridges the gap between theoretical understanding of large language models and the practical realities of large-scale training runs. Karpathy’s career arc Karpathy’s journey through the AI industry has been closely watched. He left OpenAI in 2017 to join Tesla, where he led the company’s Full Self-Driving and Autopilot programs until 2022. He returned to OpenAI for a year before departing again in 2024 to launch Eureka Labs, a startup focused on applying AI assistants to education. Since then, he has shared few updates on Eureka Labs, and it remains unclear whether he will continue that venture alongside his new role at Anthropic. He has also maintained an active presence in AI education through his online course Neural Networks: Zero to Hero and his YouTube channel, where he posts lectures on LLMs and AI. In his announcement, Karpathy said he remains deeply passionate about education and plans to resume that work in time. Anthropic strengthens security team Separately, Anthropic has brought on Chris Rohlf to its frontier red team, which stress-tests advanced AI models against severe threats. Rohlf, a cybersecurity veteran with over 20 years of experience, previously worked at Yahoo’s well-known security team known as The Paranoids and spent six years at Meta. He was also a fellow at Georgetown’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology, where he contributed to the CyberAI project. In a post on X, Rohlf said there is a real opportunity to dramatically improve cybersecurity with AI and that he could not think of a better company or team to join at this critical moment. What this means for the AI landscape Karpathy’s move to Anthropic, combined with the addition of a seasoned cybersecurity expert, suggests the company is investing heavily in both frontier model development and safety research. Pre-training remains one of the most expensive and compute-intensive phases of building advanced AI systems, and Anthropic’s decision to focus on using AI to accelerate that work could give it a unique advantage. For readers following the AI industry, this development underscores a broader trend: leading AI labs are increasingly competing not just on raw compute power, but on the quality of their research teams and their ability to innovate in how models are built and trained. Conclusion Andrej Karpathy’s return to frontier AI research at Anthropic, alongside the company’s parallel investment in cybersecurity expertise, reflects a dual focus on capability and safety. As the race to build more advanced language models intensifies, the composition of research teams and the methods they use to accelerate progress will likely become as important as the scale of the hardware they deploy. FAQs Q1: What will Andrej Karpathy do at Anthropic? He will lead a new team focused on using Claude to accelerate pre-training research, working under team lead Nick Joseph. Pre-training is the phase that gives AI models their core knowledge and capabilities. Q2: Why is this hire significant? Karpathy is one of the few researchers with deep experience in both the theory and large-scale practice of training LLMs. His move signals Anthropic’s strategy of prioritizing AI-assisted research over simply scaling compute. Q3: Will Karpathy continue his education work? He has said he remains deeply passionate about education and plans to resume that work in time, but has not provided specific details. His startup Eureka Labs has not shared recent updates. This post OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy joins Anthropic to lead pre-training research team first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

19 May 2026, 16:14

Sen. Elizabeth Warren questions OCC over granting national trust charters to crypto companies

More on related tickers BitGo: Institutional Crypto Infrastructure At A Discount Bitgo Holdings, Inc. (BTGO) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript Circle Q1: Good, But Not Enough To Buy (Rating Upgrade) SoftBank exits Circle Internet, Uber; cuts stake in T-Mobile among top Q1 moves Trump discloses $220M in trades tied to U.S. companies in Q1

19 May 2026, 16:05

Bitcoin Options Have Turned Defensive Near $77K

Summary BTC options have turned defensive near $77K, with short-dated puts clustered around $75.5K-77K and net delta flat to slightly negative. BTC daily options volume is thin ($0.08-0.39M over May 16-18), well below the May 1 peak of $12.78M. ETH gave the cleanest single-day signal on May 18: PCR 0.42, Dec 25 $2,200 call dominant, net delta +$0.19M - but it sits at the lower end of its range. The shift from May 7 conviction (PCR 0.13, +$0.93M delta) to May 18 defense (PCR 0.86, -$0.02M delta) is the key change versus earlier reports. My base case is stabilization between $75.5K and $79K. A bullish read requires call activity above $78K with positive delta. A break below $75.5K opens the breakdown case. 1) Investment Thesis BTC ( BTC-USD ) options aren't sending the same recovery signal anymore. In the May 16-19 report, BTC is sitting near $77K, volume is thin, net delta is flat to slightly negative, and the active strikes have moved closer to short-dated protection around $75.5-77K. Right now, BTC looks more like stabilization than continuation. ETH ( ETH-USD ) looks a little better, but only for one day. On May 18, ETH printed the cleanest signal in the current window: spot near $2,118, PCR at 0.42, the Dec. 25 $2,200 call as the dominant instrument, and net delta at +$0.19M. That is constructive. It is also fragile, because ETH was already trading near the lower part of its short-term range, and the same report still shows put activity around $2,100-2,125. My read is simple: BTC is defensive; ETH has a rebound attempt. Neither confirms a fresh bullish regime yet. 2) Market Context The current report covers May 16 through May 19, 2026. May 19 is only a partial signal in practice: BTC volume is effectively zero, the average trade size is $8, and the highlighted May 20 $74.5K put is only a $15 print. I exclude May 19 from the main thesis and use May 16-18 as the real window. After filtering out linear options, the current analysis uses only Deribit inverse BTC and ETH options and futures. BTC moved from $78,252 on May 16 to $76,846 on May 18. That move was not met by strong call demand. The report shows daily BTC options volume of only $0.39M, $0.08M, and $0.26M over May 16-18. That is thin participation. More important, the flow leaned toward short-dated puts close to spot. ETH moved from $2,184 on May 16 to $2,118 on May 18. Unlike BTC, ETH did produce one cleaner positive-delta call day on May 18. But the signal came after spot had already moved lower, so I read it as a rebound attempt, not leadership. 3) What Changed Versus The Previous Reports This article is based on the May 16-19 report. The older May 1-9 and May 10-15 reports are used only as historical comparison. Earlier in May, BTC still had a recovery tape. May 7 was the cleanest example: spot was $80,789, PCR was 0.13, the dominant flow sat in Sep. 25 $66K and $68K calls, and net delta was +$0.93M. It was not enough to call a new regime, but it was real upside confirmation compared with the current report. The May 10-15 report already started to weaken. May 11 looked extremely call-heavy on raw PCR at 0.09, but net delta was -$0.18M. May 14 was better, with PCR at 0.53 and net delta at +$0.20M, but the adjusted PCR moved to 1.64 after removing the dominant Jun. 5 $82K call. So even before the latest report, BTC call signals were becoming less clean. Source for this comparison: IVCompass May 10-15 report. Now the tape is different. May 16 shows PCR at 1.60. May 17 is near-neutral at 1.04. May 18 is 0.86, but net delta is still negative at -$0.02M. The shift is not panic. It is a move from recovery positioning into protection and range defense. 4) Options Market Signal BTC: Protection moved closer to spot BTC's May 16-18 options flow is defensive. On May 16, BTC traded near $78,252. PCR was 1.60, the dominant instrument was the Jun. 5 $75K put, and net delta was only +$0.01M. The bucket breakdown matters here: short-dated 0-7 day puts printed $173,383 versus $77,351 in short-dated calls. That is a 2.24x put/call imbalance in the front bucket. On May 17, the report became thinner. BTC spot was $78,059, total options volume was $0.08M, PCR was 1.04, and the dominant instrument was the May 20 $78K put. Net delta was -$0.01M. I do not take a strong directional signal from a day this small, but it did not repair the upside thesis. On May 18, BTC slipped to $76,846. PCR was 0.86, which looks less defensive at first glance, but the instrument mix still leaned toward protection near spot. The dominant instrument was the May 21 $75.5K put, short-dated put volume was $115,988, and net delta was -$0.02M. The persistent activity table confirms the same zone. The May 20 $79K call was active, but the cluster of May 19 $76.5K put, May 20 $76.5K put, May 20 $77K put, and May 21 $75.5K put sits much closer to the current spot reference. That is the area the options tape is watching now. The current report does not provide a separate adjusted-PCR distortion table for May 16-19. So I do not make an adjusted-PCR claim for this window. I read raw PCR through dominant share and net delta. That check is important: BTC's dominant instruments were not overly concentrated on May 16-18, with dominant share at 12.4%, 18.5%, and 14.9%. This is not a one-instrument distortion story. It is a broader move toward short-dated protection. ETH: One cleaner call day, but not enough ETH has the better single-day signal. On May 16, ETH traded near $2,184 with PCR at 0.75. The dominant instrument was the May 20 $2,100 put, and net delta was essentially flat. That is neutral, with a defensive edge. On May 17, ETH had a low PCR at 0.26, but net delta was -$0.02M. That is why I do not read the day as clean upside demand. May 18 is the real ETH signal. ETH traded near $2,118, PCR was 0.42, the dominant instrument was the Dec. 25 $2,200 call, and net delta was +$0.19M. The high-activity table also shows buy-heavy execution in the May 20 and May 19 $2,100 calls. I still cannot know whether those trades were opening, closing, or part of a wider structure, but the execution and delta both looked more constructive than BTC. There is still a catch. ETH also had active short-dated puts: the May 22 $2,125 put and the May 20 $2,100 put remain important. So ETH is not leading with a clean bullish structure. It is trying to rebound from the $2,100 area. 5. Futures And Spot The futures layer supports a cautious read rather than a breakdown call. For BTC, the allowed inverse term-structure rows show slight backwardation in the May 19 and May 20 contracts: -0.0069% and -0.0113% average basis. The May 21 contract moves back into contango at 0.1616%. That tells me the stress is near-term, not yet structural. BTC futures flow on May 16 and May 17 was marked as aggressive sell in the report, with buy ratios of 0.155 and 0.006. The volumes were tiny, though: $0.01M and $0.02M. That is consistent with the defensive options tape, but it is not enough to call a futures-led breakdown. For ETH, the May 20 contract showed extreme contango, while May 21 shifted into slight backwardation. ETH futures on May 18 leaned buy-heavy, but volume was only $0.02M. Again, useful context, not standalone proof. Liquidation data is clean after the universe filter. BTC inverse rows for May 16-17 show no liquidation event. ETH inverse rows on May 18 also show no liquidation event. I do not explain this move through forced liquidations. 6) BTC Scenario Map These are not mechanical support and resistance levels. They come from the options tape: the $75.5-77K put cluster, the $78K put reference, and the $79K call reference. I rank stabilization as the primary setup, recovery as conditional, and breakdown as the risk case. I am not assigning exact probabilities because the current window is too thin. Right now, stabilization is still the cleaner BTC read. To change that, I need to see call activity near $78-79K that actually adds delta. A low PCR alone is not enough. 7) ETH: One Day Of Optimism, Still Fragile ETH deserves a separate read, not a copy of BTC. The current ETH setup is built around $2,100. That is where both the spot reference and the short-dated options activity sit. The May 18 Dec. 25 $2,200 call gives ETH a cleaner upside reference than BTC had in the same window, and the +$0.19M net delta supports that read. But ETH is not free of risk. The May 20 $2,100 put and May 22 $2,125 put keep the lower side active. If ETH holds $2,100 and the $2,100-2,200 call activity keeps positive delta, ETH can become the stronger rebound candidate. If $2,100 fails, the next visible put references are lower, around $2,050 and $1,900 from the report's put activity. So my ETH read is: better than BTC on May 18, but still fragile. One positive-delta day gives a rebound signal. It does not give a confirmed trend. 8) Forward Setup The next update matters because the current window is thin. Thin data can flip quickly. BTC base setup: Stabilize between $75.5K and $79K This is the cleanest read from the report. BTC has protection around $75.5-77K and a visible call reference near $79K. If spot stays inside that zone and net delta stops drifting negative, the market can spend several sessions building a range. What confirms it: PCR stays near neutral, net delta is flat or slightly positive, and volume does not spike on put-heavy days. What weakens it: new short-dated puts appear below $75K, or May 16-style put imbalance returns with higher volume. BTC bullish setup: Reclaim $78K–$79K with delta A bullish read needs more than a spot bounce. BTC needs call activity that adds positive delta. Earlier reports showed why: May 11 had an extreme call PCR but negative net delta; May 14 improved, but adjusted PCR became much less bullish after the dominant call was removed. So the bullish trigger is specific: BTC reclaims $78-79K, calls become dominant above spot, net delta turns positive, and the near-term basis stress fades. Without those pieces, I treat rallies into $78-79K as tests, not confirmation. BTC bearish setup: Lose $75.5K with expanding puts The bearish case starts if BTC loses the May 21 $75.5K put area and the options tape follows spot lower. A break by itself is not enough. I need to see put-heavy PCR, negative net delta, and higher participation. If that happens, the next downside map opens toward lower protection levels rather than the current $75.5-77K cluster. ETH setup: Hold $2,100 or lose the rebound attempt ETH has one clear task: hold $2,100. If ETH holds that area and call activity around $2,100-2,200 keeps adding delta, the May 18 signal can extend into a rebound. If ETH loses $2,100 and put activity expands, the May 18 call signal turns into a failed rebound attempt. 9) Risks To The Thesis The first risk is liquidity. BTC options volume in the current window is very small. A thin tape can look stable until one larger session changes the picture. The second risk is false call strength. BTC already showed call-heavy days in earlier reports that did not carry positive delta. If calls return but net delta stays flat or negative, I will not treat that as upside demand. The third risk is a deeper put migration. Right now, protection is clustered around $75.5-77K. If new dominant puts move below $75K, the market is no longer defending the current zone. The fourth risk is futures stress spreading beyond the nearest maturities. Current BTC backwardation is short-dated. If it spreads further along the curve, the stabilization view weakens. The fifth risk is ETH failing at $2,100. ETH has the cleaner May 18 call signal, but it sits very close to the lower side of the current range. A break below $2,100 would make that signal much less useful. 10) Final Investor Takeaway BTC's recovery tape has faded. The current report shows thin volume, near-zero or negative net delta, and short-dated put activity close to spot. That is not a continuation signal. It is protection and stabilization. ETH gives the better single-day read because May 18 had positive delta behind the Dec. 25 $2,200 call. I still treat it as a rebound attempt, not a confirmed trend. The metrics I am watching next are ranked. Primary watch points: BTC net delta, BTC PCR with dominant instrument share, short-dated put levels around $75.5-77K, and call activity near $78-79K. Secondary confirmation: BTC near-term basis, ETH net delta around $2,100-2,200, and liquidation spike flags. If BTC holds the $75.5-77K area and delta stabilizes, the base setup stays range-bound. If BTC reclaims $78-79K with positive delta, the recovery case reopens. If BTC loses $75.5K with put-heavy flow and higher volume, I step back from the stabilization thesis. Data: Deribit inverse options + futures, May 16-19, 2026. May 19 appears partial. Historical comparison uses IVCompass reports from May 1-9 and May 10-15, 2026. Linear options excluded. Analysis: IVCompass. Disclaimer: This analysis is intended for informational purposes only. It reflects my reading of market structure and options positioning based on available data and should not be treated as financial or investment advice. Past positioning patterns do not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Original Source: Author